Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 14.688
Filter
1.
Can Vet J ; 65(6): 613-615, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38827596
2.
Can Vet J ; 65(6): 574-580, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38827599

ABSTRACT

Background: As a major animal control service provider in the city of Guelph and Wellington County in Ontario, the Guelph Humane Society transports and presents injured or ill raccoons requiring humane euthanasia to the Ontario Veterinary College Health Sciences Centre (OVC-HSC). Issues around handling, transportation, and delays before euthanasia have recently raised some concerns for welfare and the need for means of improving this process. Objective: Investigation of a noncontrolled sedation and analgesia protocol for injured or ill raccoons intended to improve animal welfare by allowing humane handling, transport, and euthanasia following administration by an animal protection officer (APO). Animals and procedure: Twenty-seven injured or ill raccoons requiring transport and euthanasia, as determined by the Guelph Humane Society APOs, were included in the study. Each raccoon was administered acepromazine (0.05 mg/kg), alfaxalone (4 mg/kg), and medetomidine (0.15 mg/kg), intramuscularly, before being transported to the OVC-HSC for humane euthanasia. Results: The combination of acepromazine, alfaxalone, and medetomidine was suitable for administration by APOs and provided the desired sedation depth to allow transport and humane euthanasia. Transit time was the only predictor of sedation depth upon arrival at the OVC-HSC. Two raccoons showed mild physical response to intracardiac injection for euthanasia. Numerical cutoff points of an in-hospital visual analog score of sedation of ≥ 70/100 and duration of sedation of < 62 min showed zero probability of response to euthanasia. Conclusion and clinical relevance: Administration of acepromazine, alfaxalone, and medetomidine at the stated doses provided acceptable sedation and analgesia to improve animal welfare during transport and eventual euthanasia of raccoons.


Évaluation d'un protocole médicamenteux sans groupe témoin de sédation intramusculaire, pré-euthanasie, comprenant de l'alfaxalone 4 %, de la médétomidine et de l'acépromazine pour les ratons laveurs blessés ou malades. Contexte: En tant que fournisseur majeur de services de contrôle des animaux dans la ville de Guelph et dans le comté de Wellington en Ontario, la Guelph Humane Society transporte et présente les ratons laveurs blessés ou malades nécessitant une euthanasie sans cruauté au Ontario Veterinary College Health Sciences Centre (OVC-HSC). Les problèmes liés à la manutention, au transport et aux délais avant l'euthanasie ont récemment soulevé des inquiétudes quant au bien-être et à la nécessité de trouver des moyens d'améliorer ce processus. Objectif: Enquête sur un protocole de sédation et d'analgésie sans groupe témoin pour les ratons laveurs blessés ou malades destiné à améliorer le bien-être des animaux en permettant une manipulation, un transport et une euthanasie sans cruauté après administration par un agent de protection des animaux (APO). Animaux et procédure: Vingt-sept ratons laveurs blessés ou malades nécessitant un transport et une euthanasie, tel que déterminé par les APO de la Guelph Humane Society, ont été inclus dans l'étude. Chaque raton laveur a reçu de l'acépromazine (0,05 mg/kg), de l'alfaxalone (4 mg/kg) et de la médétomidine (0,15 mg/kg), par voie intramusculaire, avant d'être transporté à l'OVC-HSC pour une euthanasie sans cruauté. Résultats: La combinaison d'acépromazine, d'alfaxalone et de médétomidine convenait à l'administration par un APO et fournissait la profondeur de sédation souhaitée pour permettre le transport et l'euthanasie sans cruauté. Le temps de transit était le seul prédicteur de la profondeur de la sédation à l'arrivée à l'OVC-HSC. Deux ratons laveurs ont montré une légère réponse physique à une injection intracardiaque pour l'euthanasie. Les seuils numériques d'un score analogique visuel de sédation à l'hôpital ≥ 70/100 et d'une durée de sédation < 62 min ont montré une probabilité nulle de réponse à l'euthanasie. Conclusion et pertinence clinique: L'administration d'acépromazine, d'alfaxalone et de médétomidine aux doses indiquées a fourni une sédation et une analgésie acceptables pour améliorer le bien-être des animaux pendant le transport et l'euthanasie éventuelle des ratons laveurs.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).


Subject(s)
Acepromazine , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Medetomidine , Pregnanediones , Raccoons , Animals , Medetomidine/administration & dosage , Pregnanediones/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Acepromazine/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Euthanasia, Animal , Injections, Intramuscular/veterinary , Animal Welfare
3.
Can Vet J ; 65(6): 531-532, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38827600
4.
Can Vet J ; 65(5): 421-422, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38694744
5.
Lab Anim (NY) ; 53(5): 108, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702462
6.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0298657, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713725

ABSTRACT

Zebrafish are an established and widely used animal model, yet there is limited understanding of their welfare needs. Despite an increasing number of studies on zebrafish enrichment, in-tank environmental enrichment remains unpopular among researchers. This is due to perceived concerns over health/hygiene when it comes to introducing enrichment into the tank, although actual evidence for this is sparse. To accommodate this belief, regardless of veracity, we tested the potential benefits of enrichments presented outside the tank. Thus, we investigated the preferences and physiological stress of zebrafish with pictures of pebbles placed underneath the tank. We hypothesized that zebrafish would show a preference for enriched environments and have lower stress levels than barren housed zebrafish. In our first experiment, we housed zebrafish in a standard rack system and recorded their preference for visual access to a pebble picture, with two positive controls: visual access to conspecifics, and group housing. Using a crossover repeated-measures factorial design, we tested if the preference for visual access to pebbles was as strong as the preference for social contact. Zebrafish showed a strong preference for visual access to pebbles, equivalent to that for conspecifics. Then, in a second experiment, tank water cortisol was measured to assess chronic stress levels of zebrafish housed with or without a pebble picture under their tank, with group housing as a positive control. Cortisol levels were significantly reduced in zebrafish housed with pebble pictures, as were cortisol levels in group housed zebrafish. In fact, single housed zebrafish with pebble pictures showed the same cortisol levels as group housed zebrafish without pebble pictures. Thus, the use of an under-tank pebble picture was as beneficial as being group housed, effectively compensating for the stress of single housing. Pebble picture enrichment had an additive effect with group housing, where group housed zebrafish with pebble pictures had the lowest cortisol levels of any treatment group.


Subject(s)
Housing, Animal , Hydrocortisone , Zebrafish , Animals , Zebrafish/physiology , Hydrocortisone/metabolism , Stress, Physiological , Male , Behavior, Animal/physiology , Female , Animal Welfare
7.
Vet Q ; 44(1): 1-11, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711265

ABSTRACT

Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of different treatments for BRD on health and welfare in fattening bulls. A total of 264 bulls were enrolled. Welfare was assessed on day 2 (T0) and day 15 (T1) after arrival. A decrease in the welfare level was observed from T0 to T1. All bulls were inspected clinically at T0 and T1 revealing an increase of skin lesions and lameness in T1. In both periods, a high incidence of respiratory disease was observed. A prevalence of 79.55% and 95.45% of Mycoplasma bovis using RT-PCR and culture at T0 and T1 respectively was observed. Blood samples were collected for haematology at T0 and T1. At T0, 36 animals were individually treated for BRD with an antimicrobial (IT), 54 received a metaphylactic treatment with tulathromycin (M), 150 received a metaphylactic treatment with tulathromycin plus a second antimicrobial (M + IT) whereas 24 were considered healthy and therefore not treated (NT). Additionally, 128 were treated with a non-steroid anti-inflammatory (NSAID). Neutrophils of M + IT were significantly higher than groups NT and M and the lymphocytes of M + IT were significantly lower than that of IT. White blood cells, neutrophils and N/L ratio of animals treated with an NSAID was significantly higher than that not treated. Lung inspection of 172 bulls at the abattoir indicated that 92.43% presented at least one lung lesion. A statistically significant effect of the NSAID treatment on the lung lesions was observed. Our findings indicate that BRD was a major welfare and health concern and evidence the difficulties of antimicrobial treatment of M. bovis.


Subject(s)
Animal Welfare , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Heterocyclic Compounds , Macrolides , Animals , Cattle , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Disaccharides/pharmacology , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Mycoplasma bovis/drug effects , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Mycoplasma Infections/veterinary , Mycoplasma Infections/drug therapy
9.
Vet Rec ; 194(10): 397, 2024 May 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757878
10.
Parasit Vectors ; 17(1): 221, 2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745229

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The chicken body louse is an obligate ectoparasite of domestic chickens. Chicken body lice feed on feathers, and infestation with this louse is linked to decreases in egg production, hen weight, and feed conversion efficiency. However, it is unknown how chicken body lice impact egg-laying chickens in cage-free environments. Welfare and behavior metrics were collected from flocks of egg-laying chickens either infested with chicken body lice or left uninfested. METHODS: In two trials, two flocks of cage-free commercial egg-laying chickens were infested with chicken body lice or maintained as uninfested controls. At three timepoints, behavior and welfare of all chickens was measured. On-animal sensors were used to quantify pecking, preening, and dustbathing behavior. Other animal-based welfare metrics included recording comb wounds and skin lesions. RESULTS: Birds infested with chicken body lice exhibited significantly more preening behaviors than uninfested birds, even at low louse levels. Moderate or severe skin lesions were detected on birds that were moderately infested with chicken body lice while skin lesions were never detected on uninfested birds. CONCLUSIONS: The welfare of chickens was impacted by the chicken body louse, a chewing louse that primarily feather feeds. Evidence of skin lesions on infested birds suggests that lice may cause more damage to birds than previously thought, and further evaluation of louse economic damage is necessary.


Subject(s)
Animal Welfare , Chickens , Housing, Animal , Poultry Diseases , Animals , Chickens/parasitology , Poultry Diseases/parasitology , Female , Behavior, Animal , Amblycera/physiology , Feathers/parasitology , Lice Infestations/veterinary , Lice Infestations/parasitology
11.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303498, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38781269

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Research into canine health and welfare is supported by Government, charitable and private UK funding organisations. However, there is no current overall visibility or coordination of these funding activities, potentially compromising optimal distribution of limited resources. This study aimed to survey UK canine health and welfare funding by not-for-profit funders between 2012 and 2022, providing a novel baseline analysis to inform future sector stakeholder priorities. RESULTS: Funding data were collected from 10 wide-scope funders (UK Government funding councils and medical charities), 18 animal-directed funders (organisations specifically concerned with animal health and welfare) and 81 breed community groups. These 109 UK funders together provided traceable canine-relevant funding of £57.8 million during the surveyed period, comprising 684 individual grant awards supporting over 500 separate research projects. Wide-scope funders contributed £41.2 million (71.2% of total funding); animal-directed organisations, £16.3 million (28.1% of total funding); and breed-specific groups, £370K (0.6% of total funding). Individual grants ranged from £2.3 million to £300. Funding patterns varied between sectors. Animal-directed funders provided £14.7 million of canine-relevant research funding that foregrounded the dog, 73% of all such funding; wide-scope funders provided £17.5 million of canine-relevant One Health research funding, 97% of all such funding. Customised metrics developed for this study assessed the 'benefit to the dog' and 'pathway to impact' of individual research projects. Overall, studies supported by animal-directed funders achieved significantly higher 'benefit to the dog' scores (Mann-Whitney U = 45235, p<0.001) and 'pathway to impact' scores (Mann-Whitney U = 43506.5, p<0.001) than those supported by wide-scope funders. CONCLUSION: The landscape of UK not-for-profit funding of canine health and welfare research is complex, with considerable variation between providers. Although wide-scope funders provide the majority of overall canine-relevant research funding, animal-directed funders provide the majority of canine-focused funding and support research with greater direct impact on canine welfare. Visibility of past funding patterns will enable stakeholders in this sector to make more informed decisions about future research. DEFINITIONS: To increase clarity, certain words and phrases are used in specific ways within the context of this paper. Animal-directed funders-Charities and other funding organisations whose remit primarily concerns animals or veterinary work Canine-focused research-Investigations where the primary purpose is to advance understandings of canine health and/or welfare Canine-relevant research-All research that is framed as advancing understandings of canine health and/or welfare as a primary or subsidiary purpose Institution-Refers to universities and other centres where research is carried out Organisation-Refers to funding bodies, including research councils, charities and other groups Research grant-A single funding event originating from one or more funders Research project-A cohesive piece of research concerning a particular topic; may involve multiple researchers and/or multiple research grants, in series or in parallel Wide-scope funders-Large organisations whose remit does not primarily concern animals, i.e. (in this dataset) UKRI councils and the Wellcome Trust.


Subject(s)
Animal Welfare , Dogs , Animals , United Kingdom , Animal Welfare/economics , Organizations, Nonprofit/economics , Research Personnel/economics , Research Support as Topic/economics , Biomedical Research/economics , Charities/economics
12.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11266, 2024 05 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38760454

ABSTRACT

Horse welfare is the product of multiple factors, including behavioral and physiological adjustments to cope with stressful situation regarding environment and housing condition. Collectively, it is supposed that a horse kept in the wild has a lower level of stress than other housing system, and the aim of the present study was to investigate the level of stress in domestic horses reared in the wild and then moved to human controlled housing, through saliva analysis. Twelve clinically healthy Catria (Italian local breed) mares, usually reared in the wild, were moved into collective paddocks for a folkloric event. Saliva samples were obtained before and after the change of housing condition to evaluate stress biomarkers including salivary cortisol, salivary alpha-amylase, and butyrylcholinesterase (BChol). The mares were also scored using the Welfare Aggregation and Guidance (WAG) Tool to highlight the presence of abnormal behaviors. Despite the absence of differences in behavioral scores between wild and paddocks, salivary cortisol and BChol were found to be higher in the wild and lower when mares were moved to paddocks. The highest concentrations in stress biomarkers like salivary cortisol and BChol in the wild was unexpected, but the need for managing hierarchical relationships, and the exposure to feral animals, predators, and weather changes, might explain these findings. The overall results of the present study may provide further knowledge toward stress response in domesticated horses living in the wild moved to human controlled housing system.


Subject(s)
Hydrocortisone , Saliva , Animals , Horses , Saliva/metabolism , Saliva/chemistry , Hydrocortisone/metabolism , Hydrocortisone/analysis , Female , Animals, Wild/physiology , Biomarkers/metabolism , Butyrylcholinesterase/metabolism , Stress, Psychological/metabolism , Stress, Physiological , Animal Welfare , Housing, Animal , Behavior, Animal/physiology , alpha-Amylases/metabolism , Animals, Domestic
13.
Behav Brain Sci ; 47: e70, 2024 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38738354

ABSTRACT

In their target article, John et al. make a convincing case that there is a unified phenomenon behind the common finding that measures become worse targets over time. Here, we will apply their framework to the domain of animal welfare science and present a pragmatic solution to reduce its impact that might also be applicable in other domains.


Subject(s)
Animal Welfare , Animal Welfare/standards , Animals , Humans
14.
J Anim Sci ; 1022024 Jan 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743503

ABSTRACT

Virtual Fencing (VF) can be a helpful technology in managing herds in pasture-based systems. In VF systems, animals wear a VF collar using global positioning, and physical boundaries are replaced by virtual ones. The Nofence (Nofence AS, Batnfjordsøra, Norway) collars used in this study emit an acoustic warning when an animal approaches the virtual boundaries, followed by an aversive electrical pulse if the animal does not return to the defined area. The stimuli sequence is repeated up to three times if the animal continues to walk forward. Although it has been demonstrated that animals successfully learn to adapt to the system, it is unknown if this adaptation changes with animal age and thus has consequences for VF training and animal welfare. This study compared the ability of younger and older dairy cows to adapt to a VF system and whether age affected activity behavior, milk yield, and animal long-term stress under VF management. The study was conducted on four comparable strip-grazing paddocks. Twenty lactating Holstein-Friesian cows, divided into four groups of five animals each, were equipped with VF collars and pedometers. Groups differed in age: two groups of older cows (>4 lactations) and two groups of younger ones (first lactation). After a 7-d training, paddock sizes were increased by successively moving the virtual fence during four consecutive grazing periods. Throughout the study, the pedometers recorded daily step count, time spent standing, and time spent lying. For the determination of long-term stress, hair samples were collected on the first and last day of the trial and the hair cortisol content was assessed. Data were analyzed by generalized mixed-effect models. Overall, age had no significant impact on animal responses to VF, but there were interaction effects of time: the number of acoustic warnings in the last period was higher in younger cows (P < 0.001), and the duration of acoustic warnings at training was shorter for older cows (P < 0.01). Moreover, younger cows walked more per day during the training (P < 0.01). Finally, no effects on milk yield or hair cortisol content were detected. In conclusion, all cows, regardless of age, adapted rapidly to the VF system without compromising their welfare according to the indicators measured.


For dairy farmers, pasture management is a difficult task, including feeding the herd on demand, improving pasture use efficiency, and dealing with high labor costs. Virtual Fencing (VF) is an innovative technology that can help farmers to solve these issues. In a VF system animals wear a tracking collar. Physical boundaries are replaced by virtual ones using a smartphone application. The collars emit an acoustic warning when the animal reaches the virtual boundaries, further accompanied by an aversive electrical pulse if the animal does not return to the predefined area. Previous studies have shown that cattle learned to adapt to the system easily, but it is still unclear if older animals can adapt just as quickly. Thus, this is the first study investigating the effect of dairy cow age on learning VF in a strip-grazing trial. The results showed that older and younger cows adapted to the system equally fast, with no differences in activity behavior or changes in daily milk yield. Moreover, hair cortisol levels did not indicate lasting stress in the cows associated with the VF management during the trial. These results demonstrate the potential of VF in the management of lactating grazing cows of all ages.


Subject(s)
Lactation , Animals , Cattle/physiology , Female , Lactation/physiology , Dairying , Age Factors , Adaptation, Physiological , Animal Husbandry/methods , Aging , Animal Welfare , Behavior, Animal , Milk/chemistry
16.
Animal ; 18(5): 101155, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703757

ABSTRACT

Providing bedding or access to an outdoor run are husbandry aspects intended to improve pig welfare, which is currently financially supported through animal welfare schemes in several European countries. However, they may significantly affect the environment through changes in feed efficiency and manure management. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to compare farms differing in animal welfare relevant husbandry aspects regarding (1) the welfare of growing-finishing pigs and (2) environmental impact categories such as global warming (GW), acidification (AC), and freshwater (FE) and marine eutrophication (ME), by employing an attributional Life Cycle Assessment. We collected data on 50 farms with growing-finishing pigs in seven European countries. Ten animal-based welfare indicators were aggregated into three pig welfare indices using principal component analysis. Cluster analysis of farms based on husbandry aspects resulted in three clusters: NOBED (31 farms without bedding or outdoor run), BED (11 farms with bedding only) and BEDOUT (eight farms with bedding and outdoor run). Pigs on farms with bedding (BED and BEDOUT) manipulated enrichment more often (P < 0.001), pen fixtures less frequently (P = 0.003) and showed fewer oral stereotypies (P < 0.001) than pigs on NOBED farms. There were fewer pigs with a short(er) tail on farms with than without bedding (P < 0.001). Acidification of BEDOUT and BED farms was significantly higher (compared to NOBED farms P = 0.002) due to higher ammonia emissions related to farmyard manure. Also, BEDOUT farms had higher ME than NOBED farms (P = 0.035). There were no significant differences regarding GW and FE between husbandry clusters, due to the large variability within clusters regarding feed composition and conversion. Therefore, both husbandry aspects associated with improved animal welfare have a significant influence on some environmental impacts, such as acidification and marine eutrophication. Nevertheless, the large variation within clusters suggests that trade-offs may be minimised through e.g. AC and ME.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry , Animal Welfare , Housing, Animal , Animals , Animal Husbandry/methods , Swine/physiology , Swine/growth & development , Environment , Europe , Global Warming , Eutrophication , Farms , Bedding and Linens/veterinary
17.
Sci Total Environ ; 934: 173239, 2024 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750742

ABSTRACT

Biofloc technology (BFT) is an eco-friendly aquaculture model that utilizes zero-exchange water. In this study, we investigated the integration of duckweed into BFT in an effort to enhance nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon utilization and to improve animal welfare for cultivating Megalobrama amblycephala. The experiment spanned 75 days, comparing a group of M. amblycephala supplemented with duckweed (DM) to a control group (CG) with no supplementation, where duckweed consumption relied solely on the feeding behavior of the fish. The concentrations of nitrate, total nitrogen, and phosphorus accumulation were lower in the DM than in the CG from day 45 onwards, with differences of 16.19, 26.90, and 1.45 mg/L, respectively, at the end of the experiment. The DM showed simultaneous increases of 5.77, 11.20, and 5.07 % in the absolute utilization of nitrogen, phosphorus, and carbon, respectively. The abundance of TM7a (10.27 %), linked to nitrate absorption, became the dominant genus in the water of the DM. Additionally, the abundance of Cetobacterium, associated with carbohydrate digestion, was significantly higher in gut of the DM (23.83 %) than in the gut of CG (1.24 %, P < 0.05). Supplementing the diet of M. amblycephala with duckweed improved digestion and antioxidant enzyme activity. Transcriptome data showed that duckweed supplementation resulted in an increase in the expression of genes related to protein digestion and absorption and carbohydrate metabolism in M. amblycephala, and analysis of the significantly enriched pathways further supported improved antioxidant capacity. Based on the above results, we concluded that as M. amblycephala consumes more duckweed, the differences in nitrogen and phosphorus levels between the DM and CG would continue to increase, along with a simultaneous increase in fixed carbon. Thus, this study achieved the goal of recycling BFT resources and improving animal welfare by integrating duckweed.


Subject(s)
Aquaculture , Araceae , Nitrogen , Phosphorus , Animals , Nitrogen/metabolism , Phosphorus/analysis , Aquaculture/methods , Animal Welfare , Animal Feed/analysis
18.
Prev Med ; 184: 108007, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38762144

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Excessive meat consumption (MC) is associated with multiple health risks. Additionally, it can undermine environmental sustainability and affect the potential improvement of animal welfare. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of literacy interventions (LIs) in reducing MC. METHODS: Studies assessing the efficacy of LIs addressing health risks, environmental sustainability and/or animal welfare in reducing MC were searched. We used random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the overall efficacy and conducted subgroup analyses to identify the most effective information contents. Additionally, meta-regression analyses investigated participants' age, LI duration, and follow-up length influence on LIs' efficacy. RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving more than ten thousand subjects were meta-analyzed. The pooled estimate showed that LIs had a small (Hedges's g = 0.15; 95%CI: 0.06-0.25) but statistically significant effect in reducing MC. Subgroup analysis showed that the highest efficacy was achieved when subjects were alarmed about health risks (g = 0.29; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.60), compared to informing about the risks for the environment (g = 0.18; 95% CI: -0.15, 0.51) and for animal welfare (g = 0.02; 95%CI: -0.08, 0.11). The meta-regression analysis indicated that LIs had greater efficacy in younger individuals and when the intervention duration was longer. Conversely, it was suggested that efficacy improves as the length of follow-up increases. CONCLUSIONS: Informing about health risks related to MC temporarily decreased its intake, while informing about the impact on environmental sustainability or animal welfare was ineffective. Furthermore, long-lasting LIs achieve long-term dietary change toward MC.


Subject(s)
Meat , Motivation , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Animal Welfare , Animals
19.
Vet Rec ; 194(11): 450, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38819866

ABSTRACT

Around 200 veterinary and animal welfare professionals attended this year's Animal Welfare Foundation (AWF) Discussion Forum on 13 May to debate animal welfare, ethics and rights.


Subject(s)
Animal Welfare , Congresses as Topic , Animal Welfare/standards , Humans , Animals , United Kingdom , Veterinary Medicine , Animal Rights
20.
Open Vet J ; 14(4): 952-961, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38808291

ABSTRACT

Telehealth is a rapidly developing field of veterinary medicine, particularly during and after the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The world and animal owners' expectations are changing to the point where veterinary practice will need to adapt due to information technology advancements. This narrative review describes the status, benefits, technology basics, applications, limitations, and legal aspects of veterinary telemedicine over the globe. Veterinary telemedicine is a service alongside other veterinary services that meets client needs, delivers quality medicine, and improves animal welfare. The most frequently utilized veterinary telemedicine applications include teleradiology, telesonography, teledentistry, telecardiology, telerehabilitation, anesthesia teleconsultation, telehospice and telepalliative care, telecytology, tele-endoscpy, teledermatology, tele-ophthalmology, tele-behavior therapy, and veterinary education and training. Veterinary telemedicine has a bright near future and will impact veterinary medicine and animal welfare due to its numerous advantages. These advantages include its low cost, availability, involvement in veterinary health care, online payment, and effectiveness in many clinical situations such as follow-up after an in-person examination, inspection of surgical sites, or mobility. Nevertheless, veterinary telemedicine should receive more attention from veterinary professional regulatory bodies in all countries. Moreover, it is necessary to conduct more studies to evaluate how telehealth is beginning to improve veterinary care, particularly for underserved regions.


Subject(s)
Animal Welfare , COVID-19 , Telemedicine , Veterinary Medicine , Animals , Humans , Animal Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Veterinary Medicine/trends
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...