Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 17.624
Filter
1.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(5)2024 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782445

ABSTRACT

A non-diabetic woman in her 80s presented 1 week following uncomplicated left eye cataract surgery complaining of decreased vision, gritty sensation and photophobia in the same eye. Postoperative treatment included G. Acular (Ketorolac Tromethamine 0.5%, NSAID: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) and G. Tobradex (Tobramycin 0.3% and Dexamethasone 0.1%, antibiotic and steroid, respectively) each prescribed four times a day for 2 weeks. On examination, the patient had a corneal epithelial defect which progressed to a full-thickness perforation despite ceasing the NSAID drops. Cyanoacrylate glue application with a plastic drape patch failed to seal the perforation, and a full-thickness tectonic corneal transplant was performed. On investigation, the patient had positive anti-RO and anti-LA antibodies, suggesting a diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome. We advocate for careful preoperative assessment prior to cataract surgery, patient education, close follow-up and cautious medication use postoperatively including avoiding NSAID drops in patients with risk factors for postoperative dry eye disease.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Corneal Perforation , Sjogren's Syndrome , Humans , Female , Sjogren's Syndrome/complications , Sjogren's Syndrome/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Corneal Perforation/chemically induced , Aged, 80 and over , Cataract Extraction/adverse effects , Corneal Transplantation , Postoperative Complications/chemically induced
2.
Korean J Gastroenterol ; 83(5): 197-199, 2024 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783621

ABSTRACT

5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is recommended for managing ulcerative colitis. Common adverse effects associated with 5-ASA include gastrointestinal disorders, headaches, and skin rashes. Perimyocarditis induced by 5-ASA is a rare adverse effect, with only a limited number of cases reported. This paper presents a case of 5-ASA-induced perimyocarditis in a 29-year-old female who had been taking 5-ASA for three weeks. The patient was admitted to the emergency department with dyspnea, chest discomfort, and fever. She subsequently underwent laboratory investigations, including electrocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, chest computed tomographic angiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and heart biopsy. Intravenous steroid was administered, and 5-ASA was discontinued. The patient's signs and symptoms improved significantly within a few days of discontinuing 5-ASA, leading to her subsequent discharge. This case highlights the importance of considering perimyocarditis in patients exhibiting cardiac symptoms during 5-ASA therapy, despite it being a rare adverse effect. Drug withdrawal in such cases may lead to rapid clinical improvement.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Colitis, Ulcerative , Echocardiography , Electrocardiography , Mesalamine , Myocarditis , Humans , Female , Mesalamine/therapeutic use , Mesalamine/adverse effects , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Myocarditis/chemically induced , Myocarditis/drug therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Computed Tomography Angiography
3.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 18(4-5): 203-215, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725175

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of the different pharmacological agents in preventing post-ERCP acute pancreatitis. METHODS: We included clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for prophylaxis of acute post-ERCP pancreatitis. The event evaluated was acute pancreatitis. We conducted a search strategy in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to nowadays. We reported the information in terms of relative risks (RR) with a 95% confidence interval. We assessed the heterogeneity using the I2 test. RESULTS: We included 84 studies for analysis (30,463 patients). The mean age was 59.3 years (SD ± 7.01). Heterogeneity between studies was low (I2 = 34.4%) with no inconsistencies (p = 0.2567). Post ERCP pancreatitis was less in prophylaxis with NSAIDs (RR 0.65 95% CI [0.52 to 0.80]), aggressive hydration with Lactate Ringer (RR 0.32 95% CI [0.12-0.86]), NSAIDs + isosorbide dinitrate (RR 0.28 95% CI [0.11-0.71]) and somatostatin and analogues (RR 0.54 [0.43 to 0.68]) compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs, the Combination of NSAIDs + isosorbide dinitrate, somatostatin and analogues, and aggressive hydration with lactate ringer are pharmacological strategies that can prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis when compared to placebo. More clinical trials are required to determine the effectiveness of these drugs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Pancreatitis , Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , Acute Disease , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/adverse effects , Fluid Therapy/methods , Network Meta-Analysis , Pancreatitis/prevention & control , Pancreatitis/etiology , Ringer's Lactate/therapeutic use , Ringer's Lactate/administration & dosage , Risk Factors , Somatostatin/analogs & derivatives , Somatostatin/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Assoc Physicians India ; 72(1): 14-16, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736068

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been an alarming increase in cases of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) at our center due to drug abuse. So, we conducted this study to know the incidence of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and synthetic opioid abuse in cases of GOO. METHODS: This was an observational study involving consecutive cases of GOO diagnosed from September 2017 to February 2019. A detailed history, including drug addiction history and clinical examination, was done. Investigations included routine biochemical and hematological tests, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE), ultrasonography, rapid urease test (RUT), and histopathology of the diseased area. RESULTS: Among the 102 cases diagnosed with GOO, 62 (60.78%) cases had a history of drug addiction. The drug addiction history was as follows: NSAIDs and opioids in 56, opioids alone in four, and NSAIDs alone in two cases. The most common site of stricture was the second part of the duodenum. The features on histopathology were ulcerations of the mucosa infiltrated by eosinophils, plasma cells, and lymphocytes. CONCLUSION: There is an alarming increase in the incidence of GOO due to NSAIDs and opioid abuse at our center. Efforts should be made to control the indiscriminate use of these over-the-counter drugs to prevent dreaded complications.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Gastric Outlet Obstruction , Humans , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , India/epidemiology , Incidence , Male , Female , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Gastric Outlet Obstruction/chemically induced , Gastric Outlet Obstruction/epidemiology , Gastric Outlet Obstruction/etiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Young Adult , Aged
6.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 18: 1711-1725, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38799798

ABSTRACT

Imrecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), was discovered via the balanced inhibition strategy of COX-1/COX-2. It is indicated for the relief of painful symptoms of osteoarthritis. There have been some pharmacological and therapeutic advances since the approval of imrecoxib in 2011. However, an update review in this aspect is not yet available. Relevant literature until January 2024 was identified by search of PubMed, Web of science, Embase and CNKI. From the perspective of efficacy, imrecoxib provides relief of osteoarthritis symptoms, and potential off-label use for treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, perioperative pain, hand-foot syndrome, axial spondyloarthritis, COVID-19, cartilage injury, and malignancies such as lung and colon cancer. From a safety point of view, imrecoxib showed adverse effects common to NSAIDs; however, it has lower incidence of new-onset hypertension than other types of selective COX-2 inhibitors, less gastrointestinal toxicities than non-selective NSAIDs, weaker risk of drug interaction than celecoxib, and more suitable for elderly patients due to balanced inhibition of COX-1/COX-2. From a pharmacoeconomic perspective, imrecoxib is more cost-effective than celecoxib and diclofenac for osteoarthritis patients. With the deepening of the disease pathophysiology study of osteoarthritis, new therapeutic schemes and pharmacological mechanisms are constantly discovered. In the field of osteoarthritis treatment, mechanisms other than the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of COX-2 inhibitors are also being explored. Taken together, imrecoxib is a moderate selective COX-2 inhibitor with some advantages, and there would be more clinical applications and research opportunities in the future.


Subject(s)
Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors , Osteoarthritis , Humans , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/adverse effects , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/pharmacology , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Cyclooxygenase 2/metabolism , Animals
7.
Rheumatol Int ; 44(6): 1061-1069, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38581450

ABSTRACT

Gout attacks are treated with uric-lowering and anti-inflammatory drugs. In patients with gout, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) could be both cardiovascular beneficial, due to their anti-inflammatory actions, and cardiovascular hazardous, due to their prothrombotic, hypertensive, and proarrhythmic side effects. We, therefore, examined the risk of cardiovascular events associated with NSAID use in patients with gout. We conducted a nationwide, population-based case-crossover study of all Danes ≥ 18 years of age with first-time gout during 1997-2020, who experienced a cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation/flutter, or cardiovascular death) (n = 59,150). The exposure was use of NSAIDs, overall and according to type (ibuprofen, naproxen, or diclofenac). We used the dates 300, 240, 180, and 120 before the outcome date as reference dates. We used the Mantel-Haenszel method to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the association between NSAID use and cardiovascular events. NSAID use was overall associated with 12% decreased odds of a cardiovascular event (OR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.85-0.91). This decreased odds ratio was observed for the use of ibuprofen (OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.88-0.97) and naproxen (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.97), but not for the use of diclofenac (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.90-1.05). Overall, use of NSAIDs was associated with decreased odds of all the individual components of the composite outcome. NSAIDs were not associated with an increased cardiovascular event rate when used in gout patients. Ibuprofen and naproxen appeared to have better cardiovascular risk profiles than diclofenac.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Cardiovascular Diseases , Cross-Over Studies , Gout , Ibuprofen , Naproxen , Humans , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Gout/drug therapy , Gout/epidemiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Denmark/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Naproxen/adverse effects , Naproxen/therapeutic use , Ibuprofen/adverse effects , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Adult , Diclofenac/adverse effects , Diclofenac/therapeutic use
9.
Daru ; 32(1): 449-454, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658483

ABSTRACT

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) manifested as vasculitis are rare. Antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), sulphonamides, diuretics, immunosupressants and anticonvulsants are the most common culprits for drug-induced leukocytoclastic vasculitis (LCV) but there is scarce information about barbiturates. We present a case of 53-year-old female with severe vasculitis after phenobarbital- and NSAIDs-containing medications use. The preliminary diagnosis of drug-induced vasculitis was made based on anamnestic and clinical data. Further examinations confirmed the diagnosis of LCV and excluded other more common causes of vasculitis. The causative significance of used medications was assessed by long-term observation of the patient after the reaction, including the drug challenge series and Naranjo's Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale. It was concluded that phenobarbital is the most probable culprit drug. The patient's data were included in the Armenian Registry of Patients with Severe DHRs. Since then, the patient has avoided only barbiturate-containing drugs and no reactions were noted. Thus, the case indicates that even with limited diagnostic capabilities, the final diagnosis of rare drug-induced LCV and even rarer culprit drug can be established by comparing the available data. Awareness about phenobarbital and proper recording of the case are important in the management and prevention of DHRs manifested as vasculitis.


Subject(s)
Phenobarbital , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous , Humans , Female , Phenobarbital/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous/chemically induced , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis
10.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 180: 111953, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653108

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Ketorolac is a frequently used anesthetic pain agent which is traditionally avoided during tonsillectomy due to concern for postoperative hemorrhage. Our goal was to assess the degree of risk associated with the use of Ketorolac following pediatric tonsillectomy. METHODS: The TriNetX electronic health records research database was queried in January 2024 for patients undergoing tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy under the age of 18 years and without a diagnosed bleeding disorder. Patients were separated into two cohorts either having received or not having received ketorolac the same day as surgery. Propensity score matching was performed for age at the time of surgery, sex, race, ethnicity, and preoperative diagnoses. The outcomes assessed were postoperative hemorrhage requiring operative control within the first day (primary hemorrhage) and within the first month after surgery (secondary hemorrhage). RESULTS: 17,434 patients were identified who had undergone pediatric tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy and had received ketorolac the same day as surgery. 290,373 patients were identified who had undergone pediatric tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy and had not received ketorolac the same day as surgery. 1:1 propensity score matching resulted in 17,434 patients within each cohort. Receipt of ketorolac the same day as surgery resulted in an increased risk of primary hemorrhage OR 2.158 (95 % CI 1.354, 3.437) and secondary hemorrhage OR 1.374 (95 % CI 1.057, 1.787) requiring operative control. CONCLUSION: Ketorolac use during pediatric tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy was associated with an increased risk of postoperative primary and secondary bleeding requiring surgery.


Subject(s)
Adenoidectomy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Ketorolac , Postoperative Hemorrhage , Tonsillectomy , Humans , Tonsillectomy/adverse effects , Ketorolac/therapeutic use , Ketorolac/adverse effects , Female , Male , Postoperative Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adenoidectomy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Propensity Score , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Infant
11.
BMJ Open ; 14(4): e078808, 2024 Apr 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38631836

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Potentially harmful non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) utilisation persists at undesirable rates worldwide. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on interventions to de-implement potentially harmful NSAIDs in healthcare settings and to suggest directions for future research. DESIGN: Scoping review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Central and Google Scholar (1 January 2000 to 31 May 2022). STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting on the effectiveness of interventions to systematically reduce potentially harmful NSAID utilisation in healthcare settings. DATA EXTRACTION: Using Covidence systematic review software, we extracted study and intervention characteristics, including the effectiveness of interventions in reducing NSAID utilisation. RESULTS: From 7818 articles initially identified, 68 were included in the review. Most studies took place in European countries (45.6%) or the USA (35.3%), with randomised controlled trial as the most common design (55.9%). Interventions were largely clinician-facing (76.2%) and delivered in primary care (60.2%) but were rarely (14.9%) guided by an implementation model, framework or theory. Academic detailing, clinical decision support or electronic medical record interventions, performance reports and pharmacist review were frequent approaches employed. NSAID use was most commonly classified as potentially harmful based on patients' age (55.8%), history of gastrointestinal disorders (47.1%), or history of kidney disease (38.2%). Only 7.4% of interventions focused on over-the-counter (OTC) NSAIDs in addition to prescription. The majority of studies (76.2%) reported a reduction in the utilisation of potentially harmful NSAIDs. Few studies (5.9%) evaluated pain or quality of life following NSAIDs discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Many varied interventions to de-implement potentially harmful NSAIDs have been applied in healthcare settings worldwide. Based on these findings and identified knowledge gaps, further efforts to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of interventions and the combination of intervention characteristics associated with effective de-implementation are needed. In addition, future work should be guided by de-implementation theory, focus on OTC NSAIDs and incorporate patient-focused strategies and outcomes, including the evaluation of unintended consequences of the intervention.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Quality of Life , Humans , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Pain/chemically induced , Europe
15.
J Feline Med Surg ; 26(4): 1098612X241241951, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38587872

ABSTRACT

PRACTICAL RELEVANCE: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used and are effective for the management of pain in cats. These Guidelines will support veterinarians in decision-making around prescribing NSAIDs in situations of chronic pain, to minimise adverse effects and optimise pain management. Information is provided on mechanism of action, indications for use, screening prior to prescription, use in the presence of comorbidities, monitoring of efficacy, and avoidance and management of adverse effects. CLINICAL CHALLENGES: The cat's unique metabolism should be considered when prescribing any medications, including NSAIDs. Chronic pain may be challenging to detect in this species and comorbidities, particularly chronic kidney disease, are common in senior cats. Management of chronic pain may be complicated by prescription of other drugs with the potential for interactions with NSAIDs. EVIDENCE BASE: These Guidelines have been created by a panel of experts brought together by the International Society of Feline Medicine (ISFM) and American Association of Feline Practitioners (AAFP). Information is based on the available literature, expert opinion and the panel members' experience.


Subject(s)
Cat Diseases , Chronic Pain , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Veterinarians , Cats , Animals , Humans , Chronic Pain/veterinary , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Pain Management/veterinary , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/veterinary , Cat Diseases/drug therapy
16.
Rheum Dis Clin North Am ; 50(2): 337-357, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38670731

ABSTRACT

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced malignancies often leads to off-target adverse events. Rheumatic immune-related adverse events can often linger beyond the duration of ICI therapy and sometimes requires the use of immunomodulator therapy. A key question, therefore, is if the commonly used therapies affect cancer outcomes. In this review, the authors summarize the state of the data as it currently stands, taking into consideration the limitations of the various source studies. The most information is known about glucocorticoids, which appear to be harmful especially when used early and at high doses.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Antirheumatic Agents , Glucocorticoids , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Neoplasms , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy
17.
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi ; 47(3): 286-291, 2024 Mar 12.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38448184

ABSTRACT

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a clinical syndrome characterized by chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, asthma and the development of significant airway symptoms following the ingestion of aspirin and other nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). At present, aspirin challenge is the gold standard for diagnosis. Aspirin desensitization and aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD) is one of the classical therapies. This paper described the application of aspirin desensitization and ATAD in AERD and provided the reference for the comprehensive treatment of AERD.


Subject(s)
Aspirin , Asthma , Humans , Aspirin/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Syndrome
18.
Heart Lung Circ ; 33(4): 538-542, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38458935

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) in patients undergoing pleurodesis remains controversial. Although many surgeons are comfortable prescribing NSAIDs post-operatively, some oppose this practice due to concerns of suppressing the inflammatory response and quality of pleurodesis. Only a small body of inconsistent publications exists with respect to guiding therapy in this common clinical scenario. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken assessing effect of NSAID exposure on pleurodesis outcomes. An institutional thoracic surgery database was reviewed yielding 147 patients who underwent pleurodesis for pneumothorax between 2010 and 2018. Medical records and imaging were reviewed for patient characteristics, NSAID exposure, recurrent pneumothorax and other adverse events. RESULTS: There was no overall difference between rates of recurrence and procedural failure of pleurodesis (Relative Risk [RR] 1.67 [95% CI 0.74-3.77]). However, NSAID exposure of >48 hours was associated with increased risk of recurrent pneumothorax (RR 2.16 [95% CI 1.05-4.45]). There was no increased rate of other adverse events related to NSAID usage. CONCLUSIONS: NSAID exposure does not increase failure rates or other adverse events following pleurodesis for pneumothorax. However, prolonged NSAID exposure post-pleurodesis may increase procedural failure rates. Further large volume randomised control trials are required.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Pleurodesis , Pneumothorax , Recurrence , Humans , Pleurodesis/methods , Pleurodesis/adverse effects , Pneumothorax/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Time Factors
19.
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol ; 20(4): 235-248, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553411

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory cutaneous disease that causes patients psychosocial distress. Topical therapies are utilized for mild-to-moderate disease and for more severe disease in conjunction with systemic therapies. Topical corticosteroids are a cornerstone of treatment for psoriasis, but long-term use can cause stria and cutaneous atrophy and as well as systemic side effects such as topical steroid withdrawal. Non-steroidal topical therapies tend to be safer than topical corticosteroids for long-term use. AREAS COVERED: We conducted a literature review on the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of topical therapies for psoriasis. We discuss how the PK and PD characteristics of these therapies inform clinicians on efficacy and toxicity when prescribing for patients. EXPERT OPINION: Topical corticosteroids, used intermittently, are very safe and effective. Long-term, continuous use of topical corticosteroids can cause systemic side effects. Several generic and newly approved non-steroidal options are available, but no head-to-head studies compare the effectiveness of the generics (vitamin D analogs, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus) against the newer therapies (roflumilast, tapinarof). Patients often do not respond to topical therapies due to poor adherence to treatment regimens. For patients resistant to topical treatment, phototherapy or systemic therapy may be an option.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Psoriasis , Humans , Administration, Cutaneous , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/pharmacokinetics , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacokinetics , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Dermatologic Agents/adverse effects , Dermatologic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Dermatologic Agents/pharmacology , Glucocorticoids/pharmacokinetics , Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , Medication Adherence , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors
20.
Dig Dis Sci ; 69(5): 1803-1807, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38493274

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The adverse effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) drugs on the gastrointestinal system are well recognized, but the effect of NSAID use on disease activity patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unresolved. Low-dose aspirin (LDA) is recommended for all pregnant patients with risk factors for developing preeclampsia, including autoimmune conditions. As recognition of risk factors for preeclampsia improves, the preventative use of LDA is likely to increase. AIMS: To investigate if LDA use for prevention of preeclampsia increases the risk of disease activity in pregnant women with IBD. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients with IBD who delivered from 2012 to 2020, comparing those with and without LDA use. Primary outcome was odds of clinical IBD activity in patients in remission at time of conception. Secondary outcomes were rate of elevated inflammatory biomarkers, defined as C-reactive protein > 5 ug/mL or fecal calprotectin > 250 ug/g, and rate of preeclampsia. Univariate analyses tested for associations. RESULTS: Patients taking LDA were older (p = 0.003) and more likely to have chronic hypertension (p = 0.002), to have undergone in vitro fertilization (p < 0.001), and to be on biologics (p = 0.03). Among patients in remission at conception, there was no difference in clinical disease activity or biomarker elevation during pregnancy based on LDA use (OR 1.27, 95% CI [0.55-2.94], p = 0.6). Rates of preeclampsia were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: LDA use for preeclampsia prevention did not increase the incidence of disease activity in pregnant patients with IBD.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Aspirin , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Pre-Eclampsia , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Aspirin/adverse effects , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Pre-Eclampsia/prevention & control , Pre-Eclampsia/epidemiology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...