Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 31.167
Filter
1.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(19): 2505-2511, 2024 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38817656

ABSTRACT

Chronic enteropathy associated with the SLCO2A1 gene (CEAS) is a complex gastroenterological condition characterized by multiple ulcers in the small intestine with chronic bleeding and protein loss. This review explores the potential mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of CEAS, focusing on the role of SLCO2A1-encoded prostaglandin transporter OATP2A1 and its impact on prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels. Studies have suggested that elevated PGE2 levels contribute to mucosal damage, inflammation, and disruption of the intestinal barrier. The effects of PGE2 on macrophage activation and Maxi-Cl channel functionality, as well as its interaction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs play crucial roles in the progression of CEAS. Understanding the balance between its protective and pro-inflammatory effects and the complex interactions within the gastrointestinal tract can shed light on potential therapeutic targets for CEAS and guide the development of novel, targeted therapies.


Subject(s)
Dinoprostone , Intestinal Mucosa , Organic Anion Transporters , Humans , Organic Anion Transporters/genetics , Organic Anion Transporters/metabolism , Intestinal Mucosa/pathology , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Chronic Disease , Dinoprostone/metabolism , Intestine, Small/pathology , Intestine, Small/metabolism , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Intestinal Diseases/genetics , Intestinal Diseases/pathology , Animals , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/genetics , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Ulcer/genetics , Ulcer/pathology
3.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 640, 2024 May 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38760660

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite efforts to enhance the quality of medication prescribing in outpatient settings, potentially inappropriate prescribing remains common, particularly in unscheduled settings where patients can present with infectious and pain-related complaints. Two of the most commonly prescribed medication classes in outpatient settings with frequent rates of potentially inappropriate prescribing include antibiotics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In the setting of persistent inappropriate prescribing, we sought to understand a diverse set of perspectives on the determinants of inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics and NSAIDs in the Veterans Health Administration. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Theory of Planned Behavior. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with clinicians, stakeholders, and Veterans from March 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 within the Veteran Affairs Health System in unscheduled outpatient settings at the Tennessee Valley Healthcare System. Stakeholders included clinical operations leadership and methodological experts. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed and de-identified. Data coding and analysis were conducted by experienced qualitative methodologists adhering to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies guidelines. Analysis was conducted using an iterative inductive/deductive process. RESULTS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 66 participants: clinicians (N = 25), stakeholders (N = 24), and Veterans (N = 17). We identified six themes contributing to potentially inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics and NSAIDs: 1) Perceived versus actual Veterans expectations about prescribing; 2) the influence of a time-pressured clinical environment on prescribing stewardship; 3) Limited clinician knowledge, awareness, and willingness to use evidence-based care; 4) Prescriber uncertainties about the Veteran condition at the time of the clinical encounter; 5) Limited communication; and 6) Technology barriers of the electronic health record and patient portal. CONCLUSIONS: The diverse perspectives on prescribing underscore the need for interventions that recognize the detrimental impact of high workload on prescribing stewardship and the need to design interventions with the end-user in mind. This study revealed actionable themes that could be addressed to improve guideline concordant prescribing to enhance the quality of prescribing and to reduce patient harm.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Inappropriate Prescribing , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Qualitative Research , United States Department of Veterans Affairs , Humans , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , United States , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Inappropriate Prescribing/statistics & numerical data , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Interviews as Topic , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Tennessee
5.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol ; 69: 101906, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749582

ABSTRACT

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a common endoscopic procedure which plays a key role in the management of diseases of the bile ducts and the pancreas. Despite ERCP being performed routinely since more than 4 decades, it is still related to a considerable rate of complications with post-ERCP pancreatitis being the most frequent one. Lately, endoscopic techniques have evolved, and numerous modalities have been developed to prevent or manage ERCP-related complications, especially PEP, such as the use of intra-rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), insertion of prophylactic stents in the pancreatic duct (PD) or intravenous hyperhydration. Knowledge of the various risk factors and applying validated preventive methods are keys in providing a safe procedure and optimizing overall patient care.


Subject(s)
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Pancreatitis , Stents , Humans , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Pancreatitis/prevention & control , Pancreatitis/etiology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use
6.
J Med Case Rep ; 18(1): 242, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724965

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Although viscosupplementation is a commonly used treatment for osteoarthritis and is widely regarded as a safe treatment option, it is associated with the rare complication of pseudoseptic arthritis. Most existing case reports that cite this rare complication employed the use of early broad-spectrum antibiotics. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case report, we present a 61-year-old African American female patient who presented with bilateral knee pseudoseptic arthritis in the setting of viscosupplementation. She presented 3 days after bilateral viscosupplementation injections with bilateral knee swelling, discomfort, and pain with micromotion. Her white blood cell count (WBC) was 12.83 (4.5-11 normal), her C-reactive protein (CRP) level was 159 mg/L (0-10 normal), and her erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 79 mm/hour (0-40 normal). Her left knee aspirate yielded 38,580 WBC with a negative gram stain and negative cultures. Her right knee aspirate yielded 29,670 WBC with a negative gram stain and negative cultures. Through the utilization of careful clinical monitoring, ice therapy, and non-steroidal inflammatory medication, we were able to successfully treat this patient while maintaining proper antibiotic stewardship. CONCLUSION: Pseudoseptic arthritis in the setting of viscosupplementation can be adequately treated and monitored without the use of antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Viscosupplementation , Knee Joint , Treatment Outcome , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy
7.
BMC Biotechnol ; 24(1): 26, 2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724967

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease, and it leads to irreversible inflammation in intra-articular joints. Current treatment approaches for RA include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), corticosteroids, and biological agents. To overcome the drug-associated toxicity of conventional therapy and transdermal tissue barrier, an injectable NSAID-loaded hydrogel system was developed and explored its efficacy. RESULTS: The surface morphology and porosity of the hydrogels indicate that they mimic the natural ECM, which is greatly beneficial for tissue healing. Further, NSAIDs, i.e., diclofenac sodium, were loaded into the hydrogel, and the in vitro drug release pattern was found to be burst release for 24 h and subsequently sustainable release of 50% drug up to 10 days. The DPPH assay revealed that the hydrogels have good radical scavenging activity. The biocompatibility study carried out by MTT assay proved good biocompatibility and anti-inflammatory activity of the hydrogels was carried out by gene expression study in RAW 264.7 cells, which indicate the downregulation of several key inflammatory genes such as COX-2, TNF-α & 18s. CONCLUSION: In summary, the proposed ECM-mimetic, thermo-sensitive in situ hydrogels may be utilized for intra-articular inflammation modulation and can be beneficial by reducing the frequency of medication and providing optimum lubrication at intra-articular joints.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Hydrogels , Hydrogels/chemistry , Animals , Mice , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , RAW 264.7 Cells , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/chemistry , Extracellular Matrix/metabolism , Extracellular Matrix/drug effects , Diclofenac/pharmacology , Diclofenac/therapeutic use , Drug Liberation
8.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 25(1): 344, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693474

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is a significant health problem worldwide, with a lifetime prevalence of 84% in the general adult population. To rationalise the management of LBP, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been issued in various countries around the world. This study aims to identify and compare the recommendations of recent CPGs for the management of LBP across the world. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, and major guideline databases were searched from 2017 to 2022 to identify CPGs. CPGs focusing on information regarding the management and/or treatment of non-specific LBP were considered eligible. The quality of included guidelines was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. RESULTS: Our analysis identified a total of 22 CPGs that met the inclusion criteria, and were of middle and high methodological quality as assessed by the AGREE II tool. The guidelines exhibited heterogeneity in their recommendations, particularly in the approach to different stages of LBP. For acute LBP, the guidelines recommended the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), therapeutic exercise, staying active, and spinal manipulation. For subacute LBP, the guidelines recommended the use of NSAIDs, therapeutic exercise, staying active, and spinal manipulation. For chronic LBP, the guidelines recommended therapeutic exercise, the use of NSAIDs, spinal manipulation, and acupuncture. CONCLUSIONS: Current CPGs provide recommendations for almost all major aspects of the management of LBP, but there is marked heterogeneity between them. Some recommendations lack clarity and overlap with other treatments within the guidelines.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Low Back Pain , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Low Back Pain/therapy , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Exercise Therapy/standards , Manipulation, Spinal/standards , Manipulation, Spinal/methods , Chronic Pain/therapy , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Pain Management/standards , Pain Management/methods
9.
Korean J Gastroenterol ; 83(5): 197-199, 2024 May 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783621

ABSTRACT

5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is recommended for managing ulcerative colitis. Common adverse effects associated with 5-ASA include gastrointestinal disorders, headaches, and skin rashes. Perimyocarditis induced by 5-ASA is a rare adverse effect, with only a limited number of cases reported. This paper presents a case of 5-ASA-induced perimyocarditis in a 29-year-old female who had been taking 5-ASA for three weeks. The patient was admitted to the emergency department with dyspnea, chest discomfort, and fever. She subsequently underwent laboratory investigations, including electrocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, chest computed tomographic angiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and heart biopsy. Intravenous steroid was administered, and 5-ASA was discontinued. The patient's signs and symptoms improved significantly within a few days of discontinuing 5-ASA, leading to her subsequent discharge. This case highlights the importance of considering perimyocarditis in patients exhibiting cardiac symptoms during 5-ASA therapy, despite it being a rare adverse effect. Drug withdrawal in such cases may lead to rapid clinical improvement.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Colitis, Ulcerative , Echocardiography , Electrocardiography , Mesalamine , Myocarditis , Humans , Female , Mesalamine/therapeutic use , Mesalamine/adverse effects , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/diagnosis , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Myocarditis/diagnosis , Myocarditis/chemically induced , Myocarditis/drug therapy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Computed Tomography Angiography
10.
Am Fam Physician ; 109(5): 441-446, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38804758

ABSTRACT

Acute pericarditis is defined as inflammation of the pericardium and occurs in approximately 4.4% of patients who present to the emergency department for nonischemic chest pain, with a higher prevalence in men. Although there are numerous etiologies of pericarditis, most episodes are idiopathic and the cause is presumed to be viral. Diagnosis of pericarditis requires at least two of the following criteria: new or worsening pericardial effusion, characteristic pleuritic chest pain, pericardial friction rub, or electrocardiographic changes, including new, widespread ST elevations or PR depressions. Pericardial friction rubs are highly specific but transient, and they have been reported in 18% to 84% of patients with acute pericarditis. Classic electrocardiographic findings include PR-segment depressions; diffuse, concave, upward ST-segment elevations without reciprocal changes; and T-wave inversions. Transthoracic echocardiography should be performed in all patients with acute pericarditis to characterize the size of effusions and evaluate for complications. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the first-line treatment option. Glucocorticoids should be reserved for patients with contraindications to first-line therapy and those who are pregnant beyond 20 weeks' gestation or have other systemic inflammatory conditions. Colchicine should be used in combination with first- or second-line treatments to reduce the risk of recurrence. Patients with a higher risk of complications should be admitted to the hospital for further workup and treatment.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Electrocardiography , Pericarditis , Humans , Pericarditis/diagnosis , Pericarditis/physiopathology , Pericarditis/therapy , Acute Disease , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Colchicine/therapeutic use , Echocardiography , Female , Pericardial Effusion/diagnosis , Pericardial Effusion/therapy , Pericardial Effusion/etiology , Chest Pain/etiology , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Male , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use
11.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(10)2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791116

ABSTRACT

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by continuous mucosal ulceration of the colon, starting in the rectum. 5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is the main therapy for ulcerative colitis; however, it has side effects. Physical exercise effectively increases the number of anti-inflammatory and anti-immune cells in the body. In the current study, the effects of simultaneous treatment of treadmill exercise and 5-ASA were compared with monotherapy with physical exercise or 5-ASA in UC mice. To induce the UC animal model, the mice consumed 2% dextran sulfate sodium dissolved in drinking water for 7 days. The mice in the exercise groups exercised on a treadmill for 1 h once a day for 14 days after UC induction. The 5-ASA-treated groups received 5-ASA by enema injection using a 200 µL polyethylene catheter once a day for 14 days. Simultaneous treatment improved histological damage and increased body weight, colon weight, and colon length, whereas the disease activity index score and collagen deposition were decreased. Simultaneous treatment with treadmill exercise and 5-ASA suppressed pro-inflammatory cytokines and apoptosis following UC. The benefits of this simultaneous treatment may be due to inhibition on nuclear factor-κB/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling activation. Based on this study, simultaneous treatment of treadmill exercise and 5-ASA can be considered as a new therapy of UC.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Disease Models, Animal , Mesalamine , Physical Conditioning, Animal , Animals , Mesalamine/therapeutic use , Mesalamine/pharmacology , Colitis, Ulcerative/therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/chemically induced , Colitis, Ulcerative/pathology , Mice , Male , Colon/pathology , Colon/drug effects , Colon/metabolism , Dextran Sulfate , NF-kappa B/metabolism , Cytokines/metabolism , Apoptosis/drug effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use
12.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(5)2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38792973

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Stem cell-based regeneration strategies have shown therapeutic efficacy in various fields of regenerative medicine. These include bone healing after bone augmentation, often complicated by pain, which is managed by using nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, information is limited about how NSAIDs affect the therapeutic potential of stem cells. Materials and Methods: We investigated the effects of ibuprofen and diclofenac on the characteristics, morphology, and immunophenotype of human mesenchymal stromal cells isolated from the dental pulp (DPSCs) and cultured in vitro, as well as their effects on the expression of angiogenic growth factors (VEGFA and HGF) and selected genes in apoptosis signalling pathways (BAX, BAK, CASP3, CASP9, and BCL2). Results: Ibuprofen and diclofenac significantly reduced the viability of DPSCs, while the expression of mesenchymal stem cell surface markers was unaffected. Both ibuprofen and diclofenac treatment significantly upregulated the expression of HGF, while the expression of VEGFA remained unchanged. Ibuprofen significantly altered the expression of several apoptosis-related genes, including the upregulation of CASP9 and BCL2, with decreased CASP3 expression. BAK, CASP3, CASP9, and BCL2 expressions were significantly increased in the diclofenac-treated DPSCs, while no difference was demonstrated in BAX expression. Conclusions: Our results suggest that concomitant use of the NSAIDs ibuprofen or diclofenac with stem cell therapy may negatively impact cell viability and alter the expression of apoptosis-related genes, affecting the efficacy of stem cell therapy.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis , Cell Survival , Dental Pulp , Diclofenac , Ibuprofen , Humans , Dental Pulp/drug effects , Dental Pulp/cytology , Diclofenac/pharmacology , Apoptosis/drug effects , Ibuprofen/pharmacology , Cell Survival/drug effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Stem Cells/drug effects , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/drug effects , Cells, Cultured
13.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 18(4-5): 203-215, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725175

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of the different pharmacological agents in preventing post-ERCP acute pancreatitis. METHODS: We included clinical trials of pharmacological interventions for prophylaxis of acute post-ERCP pancreatitis. The event evaluated was acute pancreatitis. We conducted a search strategy in MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to nowadays. We reported the information in terms of relative risks (RR) with a 95% confidence interval. We assessed the heterogeneity using the I2 test. RESULTS: We included 84 studies for analysis (30,463 patients). The mean age was 59.3 years (SD ± 7.01). Heterogeneity between studies was low (I2 = 34.4%) with no inconsistencies (p = 0.2567). Post ERCP pancreatitis was less in prophylaxis with NSAIDs (RR 0.65 95% CI [0.52 to 0.80]), aggressive hydration with Lactate Ringer (RR 0.32 95% CI [0.12-0.86]), NSAIDs + isosorbide dinitrate (RR 0.28 95% CI [0.11-0.71]) and somatostatin and analogues (RR 0.54 [0.43 to 0.68]) compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs, the Combination of NSAIDs + isosorbide dinitrate, somatostatin and analogues, and aggressive hydration with lactate ringer are pharmacological strategies that can prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis when compared to placebo. More clinical trials are required to determine the effectiveness of these drugs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Pancreatitis , Aged , Humans , Middle Aged , Acute Disease , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/adverse effects , Fluid Therapy/methods , Network Meta-Analysis , Pancreatitis/prevention & control , Pancreatitis/etiology , Ringer's Lactate/therapeutic use , Ringer's Lactate/administration & dosage , Risk Factors , Somatostatin/analogs & derivatives , Somatostatin/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
14.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1384365, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715797

ABSTRACT

Importance: Subacute thyroiditis (SAT) is a self-limiting and inflammatory thyroid disease. Although SAT usually improves on its own within weeks, it needs treatment when patients have pain, fever, and symptoms of thyrotoxicosis. Therapeutic drugs mainly include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and glucocorticoids. Currently, there is no systematic review or meta-analysis of the comparison of outcomes between NSAIDs and glucocorticoids for the treatment of SAT. Objectives: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the outcomes in subacute thyroiditis patients treated with glucocorticoids or NSAIDs. Data sources: Using the four electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang database and Web of Science. All publications until 21 June 2023 were searched. The reference lists of all selected articles were independently screened to identify additional studies left out in the initial search. Study selection: The literature comparing outcomes between glucocorticoids and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for patients with subacute thyroiditis will be included. Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent investigators (Anqi Yuan and Jialu Wu) extracted the data following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines (PRISMA) and then evaluated the quality of the eligible studies with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Fixed-effects models for the meta-analyses were applied. Heterogeneity was assessed with the chi-squared (x²) test (Cochran's Q) and inconsistency index (I²). The robustness of the results was tested with the sensitivity analyses. The bias of publication was assessed with the Harbord test. Main outcomes and measures: The incidence of permanent hypothyroidism in SAT patients treated with corticosteroids or NSAIDs. Results: Our study included a total of ten comparative cohort studies with 1337 participants. We found that the incidence of developing permanent hypothyroidism in the SAT patients who received glucocorticoids treatment was significantly lower than those who received NSAIDs treatment. (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.88; P = 0.01). The risk of permanent hypothyroidism in patients who received prednisone at an average initial dose < 40 mg/d was significantly lower than that in patients who received NSAIDs (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14-0.94; P = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of permanent hypothyroidism between SAT patients who received an average initial dose ≥ 40 mg/d of prednisone and those who received only NSAIDs (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.14-3.53; P = 0.67). In addition, the recurrence rate was observably higher in those receiving glucocorticoids than in those receiving NSAIDs (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.12-3.5; p = 0.02). The recurrence rate was significantly higher in patients with an average initial prednisone dose of < 40 mg/d than in the NSAIDs group. There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between patients in the mean initial prednisone dose ≥ 40 mg/d group and those in the NSAIDs group. Conclusions and relevance: In this meta-analysis, we compared the treatment outcomes of SAT patients between glucocorticoids and NSAIDs. Our results indicated that glucocorticoid treatment was associated with a lower incidence of permanent hypothyroidism than NSAID treatment. Patients treated with NSAIDs might have a lower recurrence rate. This finding might help to understand the outcome of the disease when choosing different drugs and help physicians to make appropriate decisions. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023427332.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Glucocorticoids , Thyroiditis, Subacute , Humans , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Thyroiditis, Subacute/drug therapy , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
15.
FP Essent ; 540: 16-23, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767885

ABSTRACT

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) involves ulceration of the mucosa in the stomach and/or proximal duodenum. The main causes are Helicobacter pylori infection and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. PUD occurs in 5% to 10% of people worldwide, but rates have decreased by more than half during the past 20 years. This reduction is thought to be because of H pylori management, more conservative use of NSAIDs, and/or widespread use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Common symptoms include postprandial abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and weight loss. These symptoms have broad overlap with those of other conditions, making clinical diagnosis difficult. Endoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis, especially in older patients and those with alarm symptoms, but a test-and-treat strategy (noninvasive test for H pylori and treat if positive) can be used for younger patients with no alarm symptoms. Numerous treatment regimens are available, all of which include PPIs plus antibiotics. As an alternative to PPIs, a new triple therapy with vonoprazan (which blocks acid production) plus antibiotics has been approved and appears to be superior to conventional therapy with PPIs plus antibiotics. At least 4 weeks after treatment, repeat testing for H pylori should be obtained to confirm cure. When possible, NSAIDs should be discontinued; when not possible, antisecretory cotherapy should be considered.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Peptic Ulcer , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Humans , Peptic Ulcer/diagnosis , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Helicobacter Infections/diagnosis , Helicobacter Infections/drug therapy , Helicobacter Infections/complications , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Pyrroles
16.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 679, 2024 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38812039

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Healthcare regulators in many countries undertake inspections of healthcare providers and publish inspection outcomes with the intention of improving quality of care. Comprehensive inspections of general practices in England by the Care Quality Commission began for the first time in 2014. It is assumed that inspection and rating will raise standards and improve care, but the presence and extent of any improvements is unknown. We aim to determine if practice inspection ratings are associated with past performance on prescribing indicators and if prescribing behaviour changes following inspection. METHODS: Longitudinal study using a dataset of 6771 general practices in England. Practice inspection date and score was linked with monthly practice-level data on prescribing indicators relating to antibiotics, hypnotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The sample covers practices receiving their first inspection between September 2014 and December 2018. Regression analysis and the differential timing of inspections is used to identify the impact on prescribing. RESULTS: Better-rated practices had better prescribing in the period before inspections began. In the six months following inspections, no overall change in prescribing was observed. However, the differences between the best and worse rated practices were reduced but not fully. The same is also true when taking a longer-term view. There is little evidence that practices responded in anticipation of inspection or reacted differently once the ratings were made public. CONCLUSION: While some of the observed historic variation in prescribing behaviour has been lessened by the process of inspection and ratings, we find this change is small and appears to come from both improvements among lower-rated practices and deteriorations among higher-rated practices. While inspection and rating no doubt had other impacts, these prescribing indicators were largely unchanged.


Subject(s)
Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Primary Health Care , Humans , England , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Primary Health Care/standards , Longitudinal Studies , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Quality of Health Care/standards , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , General Practice/standards
17.
Ann Med ; 56(1): 2357235, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38813682

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Tension-type headache is the most common type of primary headache and results in a huge socioeconomic burden. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of simple analgesics for the treatment of episodic tension-type headache (ETTH) in adults. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Chinese BioMedical Literature database and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform databases for eligible randomized clinical trials reporting the efficacy and/or safety of simple analgesics. A Bayesian NMA was performed to compare relative efficacy and safety. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank interventions. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018090554. RESULTS: We highlighted six studies including 3507 patients. For the 2 h pain-free rate, the SUCRA ranking was ibuprofen > diclofenac-K > ketoprofen > acetaminophen > naproxen > placebo. All drugs except naproxen reported a higher 2 h pain-free rate than placebo, with a risk ratio (RR) of 2.86 (95% credible interval, CrI: 1.62-5.42) for ibuprofen and 2.61 (1.53-4.88) for diclofenac-K. For adverse events rate, the SUCRA ranking was: metamizol > diclofenac-K > ibuprofen > lumiracoxib > placebo > aspirin > acetaminophen > naproxen > ketoprofen. The adverse event rates of all analgesics were no higher than those of placebo, except for ketoprofen. Moreover, all drugs were superior to placebo in the global assessment of efficacy. In particular, the RR of lumiracoxib was 2.47 (1.57-4.57). Global heterogeneity I2 between the studies was low. CONCLUSIONS: Simple analgesics are considered more effective and safe as a placebo for ETTH in adults. Our results suggest that ibuprofen and diclofenac-K may be the two best treatment options for patients with ETTH from a comprehensive point of view (both high-quality evidence).


To our knowledge, this is the first network meta-analysis comparing the available data on adult patients with episodic tension-type headache (ETTH) treated with different simple analgesics recommended by the current guidelines.Ibuprofen (400 mg) and diclofenac-K (12.5 mg, 25 mg) are potentially the most effective and safe treatment options, supported by high-quality evidence.


Subject(s)
Analgesics , Ibuprofen , Network Meta-Analysis , Tension-Type Headache , Humans , Tension-Type Headache/drug therapy , Analgesics/adverse effects , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Adult , Ibuprofen/adverse effects , Ibuprofen/administration & dosage , Ibuprofen/therapeutic use , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Acetaminophen/adverse effects , Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Bayes Theorem , Treatment Outcome , Diclofenac/adverse effects , Diclofenac/therapeutic use , Diclofenac/administration & dosage , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Naproxen/therapeutic use , Naproxen/adverse effects , Naproxen/administration & dosage , Ketoprofen/adverse effects , Ketoprofen/therapeutic use , Ketoprofen/administration & dosage , Ketoprofen/analogs & derivatives , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Female , Male
18.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 134: 112255, 2024 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744176

ABSTRACT

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is distinguished by persistent immune-mediated inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract. Previous experimental investigations have shown encouraging outcomes for the use of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based therapy in the treatment of IBD. However, as a primary medication for IBD patients, there is limited information regarding the potential interaction between 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASA) and MSCs. In this present study, we employed the dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced ulcerative colitis (UC) mouse model to examine the influence of a combination of MSCs and 5-ASA on the development of UC. The mice were subjected to weight measurement, DAI scoring, assessment of calprotectin expression, and collection of colons for histological examination. The findings revealed that both 5-ASA and MSCs have demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of UC. However, it is noteworthy that 5-ASA exhibits a quicker onset of action, while MSCs demonstrate more advantageous and enduring therapeutic effects. Additionally, the combination of 5-ASA and MSC treatment shows a less favorable efficacy compared to the MSCs alone group. Moreover, our study conducted in vitro revealed that 5-ASA could promote MSC migration, but it could also inhibit MSC proliferation, induce apoptosis, overexpress inflammatory factors (IL-2, IL-12P70, and TNF-α), and reduce the expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2. Furthermore, a significant decrease in the viability of MSCs within the colon was observed as a result of 5-ASA induction. These findings collectively indicate that the use of 5-ASA has the potential to interfere with the therapeutic efficacy of MSC transplantation for the treatment of IBD.


Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Dextran Sulfate , Disease Models, Animal , Mesalamine , Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Animals , Colitis, Ulcerative/therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/drug therapy , Colitis, Ulcerative/immunology , Colitis, Ulcerative/pathology , Colitis, Ulcerative/chemically induced , Mesalamine/pharmacology , Mesalamine/therapeutic use , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/drug effects , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolism , Mice , Humans , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Colon/pathology , Colon/drug effects , Colon/immunology , Cells, Cultured , Male , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use
19.
Vet Q ; 44(1): 1-11, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711265

ABSTRACT

Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of different treatments for BRD on health and welfare in fattening bulls. A total of 264 bulls were enrolled. Welfare was assessed on day 2 (T0) and day 15 (T1) after arrival. A decrease in the welfare level was observed from T0 to T1. All bulls were inspected clinically at T0 and T1 revealing an increase of skin lesions and lameness in T1. In both periods, a high incidence of respiratory disease was observed. A prevalence of 79.55% and 95.45% of Mycoplasma bovis using RT-PCR and culture at T0 and T1 respectively was observed. Blood samples were collected for haematology at T0 and T1. At T0, 36 animals were individually treated for BRD with an antimicrobial (IT), 54 received a metaphylactic treatment with tulathromycin (M), 150 received a metaphylactic treatment with tulathromycin plus a second antimicrobial (M + IT) whereas 24 were considered healthy and therefore not treated (NT). Additionally, 128 were treated with a non-steroid anti-inflammatory (NSAID). Neutrophils of M + IT were significantly higher than groups NT and M and the lymphocytes of M + IT were significantly lower than that of IT. White blood cells, neutrophils and N/L ratio of animals treated with an NSAID was significantly higher than that not treated. Lung inspection of 172 bulls at the abattoir indicated that 92.43% presented at least one lung lesion. A statistically significant effect of the NSAID treatment on the lung lesions was observed. Our findings indicate that BRD was a major welfare and health concern and evidence the difficulties of antimicrobial treatment of M. bovis.


Subject(s)
Animal Welfare , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Heterocyclic Compounds , Macrolides , Animals , Cattle , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Disaccharides/pharmacology , Disaccharides/therapeutic use , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Mycoplasma bovis/drug effects , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Mycoplasma Infections/veterinary , Mycoplasma Infections/drug therapy
20.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 18: 1711-1725, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38799798

ABSTRACT

Imrecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), was discovered via the balanced inhibition strategy of COX-1/COX-2. It is indicated for the relief of painful symptoms of osteoarthritis. There have been some pharmacological and therapeutic advances since the approval of imrecoxib in 2011. However, an update review in this aspect is not yet available. Relevant literature until January 2024 was identified by search of PubMed, Web of science, Embase and CNKI. From the perspective of efficacy, imrecoxib provides relief of osteoarthritis symptoms, and potential off-label use for treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, perioperative pain, hand-foot syndrome, axial spondyloarthritis, COVID-19, cartilage injury, and malignancies such as lung and colon cancer. From a safety point of view, imrecoxib showed adverse effects common to NSAIDs; however, it has lower incidence of new-onset hypertension than other types of selective COX-2 inhibitors, less gastrointestinal toxicities than non-selective NSAIDs, weaker risk of drug interaction than celecoxib, and more suitable for elderly patients due to balanced inhibition of COX-1/COX-2. From a pharmacoeconomic perspective, imrecoxib is more cost-effective than celecoxib and diclofenac for osteoarthritis patients. With the deepening of the disease pathophysiology study of osteoarthritis, new therapeutic schemes and pharmacological mechanisms are constantly discovered. In the field of osteoarthritis treatment, mechanisms other than the analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of COX-2 inhibitors are also being explored. Taken together, imrecoxib is a moderate selective COX-2 inhibitor with some advantages, and there would be more clinical applications and research opportunities in the future.


Subject(s)
Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors , Osteoarthritis , Humans , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/adverse effects , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/pharmacology , Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Cyclooxygenase 2/metabolism , Animals
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...