Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 48.405
Filter
1.
Hematol Oncol ; 42(4): e3289, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38824453

ABSTRACT

Daratumumab-based regimens are the new standard of care for newly diagnosed patients with AL amyloidosis based on the results of the ANDROMEDA study. However, real-world data on daratumumab efficacy in upfront therapy in unselected patients are scanty. In the framework of a prospective observational study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of daratumumab in 88 newly diagnosed patients, including subjects with IIIb cardiac stage (26%) or myeloma defining events (29%). Daratumumab was administered with bortezomib in 50 (56%) patients, lenalidomide in 31 (35%), and monotherapy in 7 (8%). The rate of serious adverse events was low (16%). The overall hematologic response rate was 75% with 52 (59%) patients attaining at least a very good partial response (VGPR) at six months. Amongst patients evaluable for organ response, the rate of cardiac and renal responses at 6 months was 31% and 21%, respectively. Comparing stage IIIb patients with the remaining ones, the rate of profound hematologic response was not significantly different (≥VGPR 57% vs. 59%, p 0.955) likewise the rate of cardiac (33% vs. 30%, p 0.340) and renal (40% vs. 16%, p 0.908) responses. Daratumumab-based regimens demonstrated to be safe and effective in treatment-naïve AL amyloidosis even in advanced stage disease.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis , Humans , Male , Female , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Aged , Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis/drug therapy , Immunoglobulin Light-chain Amyloidosis/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Prospective Studies , Lenalidomide/administration & dosage , Lenalidomide/therapeutic use , Lenalidomide/adverse effects , Bortezomib/administration & dosage , Bortezomib/therapeutic use , Bortezomib/adverse effects , Adult , Treatment Outcome
3.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 134: 112189, 2024 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38759375

ABSTRACT

Severe asthma is a complex and heterogeneous chronic airway inflammatory disease. Current treatment strategies are increasingly focused on disease classification, facilitating the transition towards personalized medicine by integrating biomarkers and monoclonal antibodies for tailored therapeutic approaches. Several approved biological agents, including anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE), anti-interleukin (IL)-4, anti-IL-5, and anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) monoclonal antibodies, have demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing asthma exacerbations, eosinophil counts, improving lung function, minimizing oral corticosteroid usage, and enhancing patients' quality of life. The utilization of these biological agents has brought about profound transformations in the management of severe asthma. This article provides a comprehensive review on biomarkers and biological agents for severe asthma while emphasizing the increasing importance of further research into its pathogenesis and novel treatment modalities.


Subject(s)
Asthma , Precision Medicine , Humans , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/immunology , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Biomarkers , Animals , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Cytokines/metabolism , Biological Therapy/methods
4.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 35(1): 2358150, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38777338

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The recent introduction of biological drugs specifically targeting the interleukins involved in psoriasis pathogenesis revolutionized the therapeutic scenario of moderate to severe forms of psoriasis. Among these, risankizumab, an anti-IL-23, was shown to be effective both in clinical trials and real-life experiences. However, data on its use on very severe forms of psoriasis, defined by a Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) of at least 30, are scant. In this context, our study aimed to investigate the outcomes of patients with very severe psoriasis, and the involvement of difficult-to-treat areas treated with risankizumab for up to 2 years. METHODS: A retrospective, observational study enrolled patients with very severe plaque psoriasis and the involvement of difficult-to-treat areas undergoing treatment with risankizumab. Clinical and demographic data were collected at baseline. Moreover, at baseline and each dermatological examination (16, 28, 40 and 104 weeks), clinical improvement was measured using the percentage of patients achieving PASI 75/90/100 response, site-specific Psoriasis Global Assessment and Dermatology Life Quality Index. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean PASI was 35.1 ± 5.1. A significant reduction was observed since week 16 and maintained up to week 104. Moreover, the Psoriasis Global Assessment and Dermatology Life Quality Index improved as well. CONCLUSIONS: Risankizumab showed to be effective and safe in patients affected by very severe forms of psoriasis with the involvement of difficult-to-treat areas.


Subject(s)
Psoriasis , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Psoriasis/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use
5.
Br J Nurs ; 33(10): S4-S8, 2024 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780987

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Efforts to increase capacity for oncology treatment in the author's Chemotherapy Day Unit, while allowing staff to treat more patients and offer more flexibility to patients, increased strain on the Aseptic Pharmacy at the author's Trust. Therefore, the possibility of nurse-led drug preparation was explored. AIMS: Nurse-led monoclonal antibody (MAb) preparation was piloted to investigate whether a reduction in reliance on Aseptic Pharmacy could co-exist with maintaining optimal treatment capacity. The effectiveness of a closed system transfer device (CSTD) to protect nurses against drug exposure was also explored. METHODS: A risk assessment for MAbs considered for nurse-led preparation was created, alongside a procedure for the safe handling of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) with the use of a CSTD. FINDINGS: The pilot resulted in an 89% reduction in the time patients had to wait for MAbs to be prepared. Seven oncology drugs were included in the new procedure without increasing the risk of exposure for nurses. CONCLUSION: The pilot successfully reduced demand on Aseptic Pharmacy while enabling efficient capacity use on the Chemotherapy Day Unit. The use of the CSTD minimised the risk of nurse exposure to SACT.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Pilot Projects , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Compounding , Oncology Nursing , Risk Assessment
6.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 35(1): 2351489, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724042

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Genital involvement in atopic dermatitis(AD) can have a significant impact on the patient's quality of life. However, inspection of genital areas is not usually conducted during routine examination and patients may be reluctant to inform the clinician or show this area. OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the efficacy of tralokinumab in AD patients with genital involvement. METHODS: Adult patients with moderate/severe AD and genital involvement receiving tralokinumab have been analyzed. Primary endpoints were EASI, DLQI, PP-NRS, genital-IGA (g-IGA) and genital itching (GI) at week 16. RESULTS: out of 48 patients with moderate/severe AD under treatment with tralokinumab, 12 patients (25%) showed a genital involvement. Seven patients reported itching in the genital area (58%), while none reported a positive history of genital infections. Median scores at T0 were EASI 17.5, PP-NRS 8 and DLQI 14. After 16 weeks of treatment, we observed a median EASI of 3, a median PP-NRS of 1 and a median DLQI of 1. Finally, concerning the genital response, after 16 weeks of treatment, we observed a statistically significant decrease in mean GI and g-IGA scores. CONCLUSION: despite the small size of our sample, tralokinumab can be considered as a valid treatment option for AD with genital involvement.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Dermatitis, Atopic , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/pathology , Male , Female , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome , Pruritus/drug therapy , Pruritus/etiology , Quality of Life , Young Adult , Genital Diseases, Female/drug therapy , Genital Diseases, Male/drug therapy
8.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1447: 139-149, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724791

ABSTRACT

Dupilumab and tralokinumab are currently the only FDA-approved biologic therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Tralokinumab is approved for patients greater than 18 years old, and dupilumab is approved for patients as young as 6 months old. Both medications are effective in clinical trials at improving atopic dermatitis. With a good safety profile and low-risk adverse events, dupilumab and tralokinumab are generally excellent treatment options for patients with severe or refractory atopic dermatitis.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Dermatitis, Atopic , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/immunology , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Biological Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome
9.
Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci ; 100(5): 293-308, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735753

ABSTRACT

Multifunctional molecules involved in tumor progression and metastasis have been identified as valuable targets for immunotherapy. Among these, chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 4 (CSPG4), a significant tumor cell membrane-bound proteoglycan, has emerged as a promising target, especially in light of advances in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. The profound bioactivity of CSPG4 and its role in pivotal processes such as tumor proliferation, migration, and neoangiogenesis underline its therapeutic potential. We reviewed the molecular intricacies of CSPG4, its functional attributes within tumor cells, and the latest clinical-translational advances targeting it. Strategies such as blocking monoclonal antibodies, conjugate therapies, bispecific antibodies, small-molecule inhibitors, CAR T-cell therapies, trispecific killer engagers, and ribonucleic acid vaccines against CSPG4 were assessed. CSPG4 overexpression in diverse tumors and its correlation with adverse prognostic outcomes emphasize its significance in cancer biology. These findings suggest that targeting CSPG4 offers a promising avenue for future cancer therapy, with potential synergistic effects when combined with existing treatments.


Subject(s)
Immunotherapy , Neoplasms , Humans , Immunotherapy/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/immunology , Animals , Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycans/metabolism , Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycans/immunology , Proteoglycans/metabolism , Proteoglycans/chemistry , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antigens , Membrane Proteins
10.
Exp Dermatol ; 33(5): e15067, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757460

ABSTRACT

Patients receiving interleukin (IL)-inhibiting biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) may be treated with escalated doses to optimize outcomes. This study evaluated escalation prevalence in a Japanese claims analysis of patients with PsO diagnosis preceding IL-inhibiting biologic treatment and ≥1 post-induction maintenance claim (index date) with sufficient data availability from January 2014 to May 2022. Patients with non-persistence were excluded. Expected daily dose (EDD) was calculated as the recommended maintenance dose divided by the treatment interval. Dose escalation was defined as ≥2 claims showing a ≥20% increase in the observed average daily dose (ADD) over the EDD (with sensitivities requiring ≥1 claim and ≥30%). Significant differences were tested using multivariable regressions. The study included 982 unique patients treated with brodalumab (BRO; n = 104), guselkumab (GUS; n = 207), ixekizumab (IXE; n = 159), risankizumab (RIS; n = 135), secukinumab (SEC; n = 215) and ustekinumab (UST; n = 196). Within 12 months, dose escalation was observed for all IL-inhibiting biologics other than GUS and RIS: 44.4% for UST, 37.2% for IXE, 3.4% for SEC and 1.4% for BRO. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, odds of dose escalation were significantly lower for all products relative to UST. In sensitivities, escalation was observed for all products except RIS.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Psoriasis , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Humans , Japan , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Biological Products/administration & dosage , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Severity of Illness Index , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Ustekinumab/therapeutic use , Ustekinumab/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Interleukins , Aged
15.
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi ; 63(5): 517-520, 2024 May 01.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715493

ABSTRACT

A 52-year-old woman was admitted with a primary complaint of abdominal distension and increased abdominal circumference for more than half a year. There was no evidence of infection or solid tumor on abdominocentesis or laparoscopic surgery. Concurrently, smoldering multiple myeloma was diagnosed. Due to refractory ascites and portal hypertension, a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was performed, but the efficacy was not satisfactory. As the anemia progressed, she was finally diagnosed with active multiple myeloma after monoclonal plasma cells were detected in the ascites by flow cytometry. Treated with a triplet regimen that included bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (BCD), she achieved a very good partial response and ascites regressed.


Subject(s)
Ascites , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Ascites/etiology , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Bortezomib/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Hypertension, Portal
16.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e249417, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696168

ABSTRACT

Importance: The treatment paradigm for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) has undergone substantial transformation due to the introduction of effective, novel therapeutic agents. However, outcomes remain poor, and little is known about current treatment approaches and attrition rates for patients with aUC. Objectives: To delineate evolving treatment patterns and attrition rates in patients with aUC using a US-based patient-level sample. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used patient-level data from the nationwide deidentified electronic health record database Flatiron Health, originating from approximately 280 oncology clinics across the US. Patients included in the analysis received treatment for metastatic or local aUC at a participating site from January 1, 2011, to January 31, 2023. Patients receiving treatment for 2 or more different types of cancer or participating in clinical trials were excluded from the analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize the (1) treatment received in each line (cisplatin-based regimens, carboplatin-based regimens, programmed cell death 1 and/or programmed cell death ligand 1 [PD-1/PD-L1] inhibitors, single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy, enfortumab vedotin, erdafitinib, sacituzumab govitecan, or others) and (2) attrition of patients with each line of therapy, defined as the percentage of patients not progressing to the next line. Results: Of the 12 157 patients within the dataset, 7260 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis (5364 [73.9%] men; median age at the start of first-line treatment, 73 [IQR, 66-80] years). All patients commenced first-line treatment; of these, only 2714 (37.4%) progressed to receive second-line treatment, and 857 (11.8%) advanced to third-line treatment. The primary regimens used as first-line treatment contained carboplatin (2241 [30.9%]), followed by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (2174 [29.9%]). The PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors emerged as the predominant choice in the second- and third-line (1412 of 2714 [52.0%] and 258 of 857 [30.1%], respectively) treatments. From 2019 onward, novel therapeutic agents were increasingly used in second- and third-line treatments, including enfortumab vedotin (219 of 2714 [8.1%] and 159 of 857 [18.6%], respectively), erdafitinib (39 of 2714 [1.4%] and 28 of 857 [3.3%], respectively), and sacituzumab govitecan (14 of 2714 [0.5%] and 34 of 857 [4.0%], respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that approximately two-thirds of patients with aUC did not receive second-line treatment. Most first-line treatments do not include cisplatin-based regimens and instead incorporate carboplatin- or PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based therapies. These data warrant the provision of more effective and tolerable first-line treatments for patients with aUC.


Subject(s)
Carboplatin , Humans , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Aged , United States , Carboplatin/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urologic Neoplasms/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Cisplatin/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use
17.
Cancer Med ; 13(9): e7232, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698679

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Comparative investigations evaluating the efficacy of pomalidomide-based (Pom-based) versus daratumumab-based (Dara-based) therapies in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) remain scarce, both in randomized controlled trials and real-world studies. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 140 RRMM patients treated with Pom-based or Dara-based or a combination of pomalidomide and daratumumab (DPd) regimens in a Chinese tertiary hospital between December 2018 and July 2023. RESULTS: The overall response rates (ORR) for Pom-based (n = 48), Dara-based (n = 68), and DPd (n = 24) groups were 57.8%, 84.6%, and 75.0%, respectively (p = 0.007). At data cutoff on August 1, 2023, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.7 months (95% CI: 5.0-6.5) for the Pom-based group, 10.5 months (5.2-15.8) for the Dara-based group, and 6.7 months (4.0-9.3) for the DPd group (p = 0.056). Multivariate analysis identified treatment regimens (Dara-based vs. Pom-based, DPd vs. Pom-based) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) as independent prognostic factors for PFS. In the subgroups of patients aged >65 years, with ECOG PS ≥2, lines of therapy ≥2, extramedullary disease or double-refractory disease (refractory to both lenalidomide and proteasome inhibitors), the superiority of Dara-based regimens over Pom-based regimens was not evident. A higher incidence of infections was observed in patients receiving Dara-based and DPd regimens (Pom-based 39.6% vs. Dara-based 64.7% vs. DPd 70.8%, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In real-world settings, Pom-based, Dara-based, and DPd therapies exhibited favorable efficacy in patients with RRMM. Dara-based therapy yielded superior clinical response and PFS compared to Pom-based therapy.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Multiple Myeloma , Thalidomide , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Thalidomide/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , China , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Progression-Free Survival , Aged, 80 and over , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
18.
Skin Therapy Lett ; 29(3): 5-8, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38781953

ABSTRACT

The pathogenesis of psoriasis has been linked to autoimmune and autoinflammatory traits that result in atypical cytokine and keratinocyte activation and proliferation. Many cytokine pathways are involved in the development of inflammation with interleukin-23 (IL-23) playing a significant role in plaque-type psoriasis. Biologic agents that target specific cytokines have shown to be effective therapies in the treatment of plaque-type psoriasis over other conventional treatments such as systemic retinoids. Tildrakizumab is an immunoglobulin G1-kappa monoclonal antibody that inhibits the IL-23/IL-17 pathway and has demonstrated through two three-part randomized Phase 3 clinical trials (reSURFACE 1 and reSURFACE 2) and their extension trials to be an efficacious and safe therapy for the targeted treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Psoriasis , Humans , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Interleukin-23/antagonists & inhibitors , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Interleukin-17/antagonists & inhibitors , Treatment Outcome , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
19.
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao ; 40(5): 1431-1447, 2024 May 25.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783807

ABSTRACT

In recent years, there has been a frequent occurrence of various epidemics worldwide such as COVID-19, monkeypox, influenza, and others additionally, there has been an increase in the number of new patients diagnosed with various types of tumors. Traditional drugs have limited effectiveness against emerging infectious diseases, tumors, and autoimmune diseases. However, with the emergence of hybridoma technology, monoclonal antibodies have achieved extensive applications and antibody drugs are playing an important role in modern medicine. Monoclonal antibodies have undergone various development stages, starting from mouse-derived antibodies to human-mouse chimeric antibodies, humanized antibodies, and ultimately human antibodies. Throughout this process, their immunogenicity has gradually decreased, while their safety for human use steadily increased. Fully human antibodies are currently the safest form of antibody, because their sequences all come from human sources and they do not induce human anti-murine antibody reactions. With the advance of genetic engineering technology, flow cytometry coupled to single B cell gene amplification technology has made it easier to construct and screen for fully human monoclonal antibodies. The development of antibody drugs has provided new opportunities, and the market for monoclonal antibody drugs will further expand. This article reviews the research progress of monoclonal antibodies and presents information on the 163 monoclonal antibody drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as of Oct 1st, 2023. The aim is to offer new insights for the development and production of monoclonal antibodies in China.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antibodies, Monoclonal/biosynthesis , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Humans , Animals , Mice , United States Food and Drug Administration
20.
Dermatol Clin ; 42(3): 365-375, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38796268

ABSTRACT

Significant research advances in our understanding of psoriatic disease have led to the development of several highly selective, effective, and safe topical and systemic treatments. These treatments have led to unprecedented levels of disease clearance and control for most patients with psoriasis with cutaneous disease. However, there remains a need for improved treatments for those patients with recalcitrant disease, psoriatic arthritis, or nonplaque disease variants. Recently approved therapies and investigational products in ongoing clinical development programs that target IL-17A/F, IL-23, TYK2, PDE4, AhR or IL-36 cytokine signaling are improving the clinician's ability to care for a broader range of patients affected by psoriasis.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents , Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors , Psoriasis , Humans , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Interleukin-23/antagonists & inhibitors , Ustekinumab/therapeutic use , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Interleukin-17/antagonists & inhibitors , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , TYK2 Kinase/antagonists & inhibitors , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...