Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.712
Filter
1.
Cancer Med ; 13(11): e7304, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38826094

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The surge in omicron variants has caused nationwide breakthrough infections in mainland China since the December 2022. In this study, we report the neutralization profiles of serum samples from the patients with breast cancer and the patients with liver cancer who had contracted subvariant breakthrough infections. METHODS: In this real-world study, we enrolled 143 COVID-19-vaccinated (81 and 62 patients with breast and liver cancers) and 105 unvaccinated patients with cancer (58 and 47 patients with breast and liver cancers) after omicron infection. Anti-spike receptor binding domain (RBD) IgGs and 50% pseudovirus neutralization titer (pVNT50) for the preceding (wild type), circulating omicron (BA.4-BA.5, and BF.7), and new subvariants (XBB.1.5) were comprehensively analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with liver cancer receiving booster doses had higher levels of anti-spike RBD IgG against circulating omicron (BA.4-BA.5, and BF.7) and a novel subvariant (XBB.1.5) compared to patients with breast cancer after breakthrough infection. Additionally, all vaccinated patients produced higher neutralizing antibody titers against circulating omicron (BA.4-BA.5, and BF.7) compared to unvaccinated patients. However, the unvaccinated patients produced higher neutralizing antibody against XBB.1.5 than vaccinated patients after Omicron infection, with this trend being more pronounced in breast cancer than in liver cancer patients. Moreover, we found that there was no correlation between anti-spike RBD IgG against wildtype virus and the neutralizing antibody titer, but a positive correlation between anti-spike RBD IgG and the neutralizing antibody against XBB.1.5 was found in unvaccinated patients. CONCLUSION: Our study found that there may be differences in vaccine response and protective effect against COVID-19 infection in patients with liver and breast cancer. Therefore, we recommend that COVID-19 vaccine strategies should be optimized based on vaccine components and immunology profiles of different patients with cancer.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Liver Neoplasms , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Female , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , Liver Neoplasms/virology , Liver Neoplasms/immunology , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/virology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Middle Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , China/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Adult , Aged , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Male , Disease Outbreaks , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology
2.
BMC Nephrol ; 25(1): 176, 2024 May 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778281

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease on haemodialysis (HD) were given priority COVID-19 vaccination due to increased disease risk. The immune response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients on HD was diminished compared to healthy individuals in 2-dose studies. This study aimed to evaluate seroconversion rate, neutralizing antibody (nAB) levels and longitudinal antibody dynamics to 3-dose heterologous vaccination against COVID-19 in a cohort of HD patients compared to healthy controls and assess patient factors associated with antibody levels. METHODS: This study was a case-control longitudinal evaluation of nAB dynamics in 74 HD patients compared to 37 healthy controls in a low/middle income setting. Corresponding samples were obtained from the two cohorts at time-points (TP) 1-1-month post 2nd dose of AZD1222 vaccine, TP2- 4 months post 2nd dose, TP4- 2 weeks post 3rd dose with BNT162b2 vaccine, TP5-5 months post 3rd dose and TP6-12 months post 3rd dose. Additional data is available at TP0- pre 2nd dose and TP3- 6 months post 2nd dose in HC and HD cohorts respectively. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 nAB were detected using Genscript cPassTM pseudoviral neutralization kit. Demographic and clinical details were obtained using an interviewer administered questionnaire. RESULTS: Cohorts were gender matched while mean age of the HD cohort was 54.1yrs (vs HCs mean age, 42.6yrs, p < 0.05). Percentage seroconverted and mean/median antibody level (MAB) in the HD cohort vs HCs at each sampling point were, TP1-83.7% vs 100% (p < 0.05), MAB-450 IU/ml vs 1940 IU/ml (p < 0.0001); TP2-71.4% vs 100%, (p < 0.001), MAB- 235 IU/ml vs 453 IU/ml, (p < 0.05); TP4-95.2% vs 100% (p > 0.05), MAB-1029 IU/ml vs 1538 IU/ml (p < 0.0001); TP5-100% vs 100%, MAB-1542 IU/ml vs 1741IU/ml (p > 0.05); TP6-100% vs 100%, MAB-1961 IU/ml vs 2911 IU/ml (p > 0.05). At TP2, patients aged < 60 years (p < 0.001) were associated with maintaining seropositivity compared to patients > 60 years. CONCLUSION: Two dose vaccination of haemodialysis patients provided poor nAB levels which improved markedly following 3rd dose vaccination, the effect of which was long- lasting with high nAB levels in both patients and controls detectable at 1 year follow-up.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Renal Dialysis , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Longitudinal Studies , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Case-Control Studies , Adult , Aged , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/immunology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Seroconversion , Vaccination
3.
Ecohealth ; 21(1): 1-8, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748281

ABSTRACT

From July 2020 to June 2021, 248 wild house mice (Mus musculus), deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), brown rats (Rattus norvegicus), and black rats (Rattus rattus) from Texas and Washington, USA, and British Columbia, Canada, were tested for SARS-CoV-2 exposure and infection. Two brown rats and 11 house mice were positive for neutralizing antibodies using a surrogate virus neutralization test, but negative or indeterminate with the Multiplexed Fluorometric ImmunoAssay COVID-Plex, which targets full-length spike and nuclear proteins. Oro-nasopharyngeal swabs and fecal samples tested negative by RT-qPCR, with an indeterminate fecal sample in one house mouse. Continued surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in wild rodents is warranted.


Subject(s)
Animals, Wild , COVID-19 , Cities , Animals , Mice , Rats/virology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Animals, Wild/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Peromyscus/virology , Feces/virology , Rodent Diseases/virology , Rodent Diseases/epidemiology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood
4.
Vaccine ; 42(16): 3536-3546, 2024 Jun 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38705804

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A single dose of Ad26.COV2.S is well-tolerated and effective in preventing moderate-to-severe disease outcomes due to COVID-19. We evaluated the impact of dose level, number of doses, and dose interval on immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of Ad26.COV2.S in adults. Anamnestic responses were also explored. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2a study was conducted in adults aged 18-55 years and ≥ 65 years (NCT04535453). Four dose levels (1.25 × 1010, 2.5 × 1010, 5 × 1010, and 1 × 1011 viral particles [vp], single and 2-dose schedules, and dose intervals of 56 and 84 days, were assessed. Four or 6 months post-primary vaccination, Ad26.COV2.S 1.25 × 1010 vp was given to evaluate anamnestic responses. Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses were measured. Reactogenicity and safety were assessed in all participants. RESULTS: All Ad26.COV2.S schedules induced humoral responses with evidence of a dose response relationship. A single dose of Ad26.COV2.S (5 × 1010 vp) induced antibody and cellular immune responses that persisted for up to at least 6 months. In the 2-dose regimens, antibody responses were higher than 1-dose regimens at comparable dose levels, and the magnitude of the immune response increased when the interval between doses was increased (84 days vs 56 days). Rapid, marked immune responses were observed in all groups after vaccine antigen exposure indicating immune memory. Durable immune responses were observed in all groups for up to at least 6 months post-antigen exposure. Strong and consistent correlations between neutralising and binding antibodies were observed CD4 + and CD8 + T cell responses were similar after all regimens. Reactogenicity within 7 days post-vaccination tended to be dose-related. CONCLUSION: The study supports the primary, single dose schedule with Ad26.COV2.S at 5 × 1010 vp and homologous booster vaccination after a 6 month interval. Rapid and marked responses to vaccine antigen exposure indicate induction of immune memory by 1- and 2-dose primary vaccination.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Young Adult , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Adolescent , Ad26COVS1/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Aged , Immunization Schedule , Vaccination/methods , Immunologic Memory , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Immunity, Humoral , Immunity, Cellular/immunology
5.
J Med Virol ; 96(5): e29640, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38699969

ABSTRACT

After the termination of zero-COVID-19 policy, the populace in China has experienced both Omicron BA.5 and XBB waves. Considering the poor antibody responses and severe outcomes observed among the elderly following infection, we conducted a longitudinal investigation to examine the epidemiological characteristics and antibody kinetics among 107 boosted elderly participants following the Omicron BA.5 and XBB waves. We observed that 96 participants (89.7%) were infected with Omicron BA.5, while 59 (55.1%) participants were infected with Omicron XBB. Notably, 52 participants (48.6%) experienced dual infections of both Omicron BA.5 and XBB. The proportion of symptomatic cases appeared to decrease following the XBB wave (18.6%) compared to that after the BA.5 wave (59.3%). Omicron BA.5 breakthrough infection induced lower neutralizing antibody titers against XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1, while reinfection with Omicron XBB broadened the antibody responses against all measured Omicron subvariants and may alleviate the wild type-vaccination induced immune imprinting. Boosted vaccination type and comorbidities were the significant factors associated with antibody responses. Updated vaccines based on emerging severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variants are needed to control the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic in the elderly.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Breakthrough Infections , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunization, Secondary , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Male , Female , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Aged, 80 and over , Middle Aged , Longitudinal Studies , Vaccination
6.
Lancet HIV ; 11(5): e285-e299, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692824

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An effective HIV vaccine will most likely need to have potent immunogenicity and broad cross-subtype coverage. The aim of the HIV Vaccine Trials Network (HVTN) 124 was to evaluate safety and immunogenicity of a unique polyvalent DNA-protein HIV vaccine with matching envelope (Env) immunogens. METHODS: HVTN 124 was a randomised, phase 1, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, including participants who were HIV seronegative and aged 18-50 years at low risk for infection. The DNA vaccine comprised five plasmids: four copies expressing Env gp120 (clades A, B, C, and AE) and one gag p55 (clade C). The protein vaccine included four DNA vaccine-matched GLA-SE-adjuvanted recombinant gp120 proteins. Participants were enrolled across six clinical sites in the USA and were randomly assigned to placebo or one of two vaccine groups (ie, prime-boost or coadministration) in a 5:1 ratio in part A and a 7:1 ratio in part B. Vaccines were delivered via intramuscular needle injection. The primary outcomes were safety and tolerability, assessed via frequency, severity, and attributability of local and systemic reactogenicity and adverse events, laboratory safety measures, and early discontinuations. Part A evaluated safety. Part B evaluated safety and immunogenicity of two regimens: DNA prime (administered at months 0, 1, and 3) with protein boost (months 6 and 8), and DNA-protein coadministration (months 0, 1, 3, 6, and 8). All randomly assigned participants who received at least one dose were included in the safety analysis. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03409276) and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS: Between April 19, 2018 and Feb 13, 2019, 60 participants (12 in part A [five men and seven women] and 48 in part B [21 men and 27 women]) were enrolled. All 60 participants received at least one dose, and 14 did not complete follow-up (six of 21 in the prime-boost group and eight of 21 in the coadminstration group). 11 clinical adverse events deemed by investigators as study-related occurred in seven of 48 participants in part B (eight of 21 in the prime-boost group and three of 21 in the coadministration group). Local reactogenicity in the vaccine groups was common, but the frequency and severity of reactogenicity signs or symptoms did not differ between the prime-boost and coadministration groups (eg, 20 [95%] of 21 in the prime-boost group vs 21 [100%] of 21 in the coadministration group had either local pain or tenderness of any severity [p=1·00], and seven [33%] vs nine [43%] had either erythema or induration [p=0·97]), nor did laboratory safety measures. There were no delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions or vasculitis or any severe clinical adverse events related to vaccination. The most frequently reported systemic reactogenicity symptoms in the active vaccine groups were malaise or fatigue (five [50%] of ten in part A and 17 [81%] of 21 in the prime-boost group vs 15 [71%] of 21 in the coadministration group in part B), headache (five [50%] and 18 [86%] vs 12 [57%]), and myalgia (four [40%] and 13 [62%] vs ten [48%]), mostly of mild or moderate severity. INTERPRETATION: Both vaccine regimens were safe, warranting evaluation in larger trials. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health and US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.


Subject(s)
AIDS Vaccines , HIV Antibodies , HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Vaccines, DNA , Humans , AIDS Vaccines/administration & dosage , AIDS Vaccines/immunology , AIDS Vaccines/adverse effects , Adult , Male , Female , Double-Blind Method , Vaccines, DNA/administration & dosage , Vaccines, DNA/immunology , Vaccines, DNA/adverse effects , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/immunology , Middle Aged , Young Adult , HIV Antibodies/blood , Adolescent , HIV-1/immunology , United States , Immunization, Secondary , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , HIV Envelope Protein gp120/immunology , HIV Envelope Protein gp120/genetics , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood
7.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 23(1): 498-509, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695310

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaccination remains the cornerstone of defense against COVID-19 globally. This study aims to assess the safety and immunogenicity profile of innovative vaccines LYB001. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled trial, in 100 healthy Chinese adults (21 to 72 years old). Three doses of 30 or 60 µg of SARS-CoV-2 RBD-based VLP vaccine (LYB001), or the SARS-CoV-2 RBD-based protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001, control group) were administered with a 28-day interval. Differences in the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and indicators of humoral and cellular immunity among the different groups were measured. RESULTS: No severe adverse events were confirmed to be vaccine-related, and there was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the LYB001 and control group or the age subgroups (p > 0.05). The LYB001 groups had significantly higher or comparable levels of seroconversion rates, neutralization antibody, S protein-binding antibody, and cellular immunity after whole vaccination than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that LYB001 developed on the VLP platform is safe and well tolerated with favorable immunogenicity for fundamental vaccination in healthy adults. Therefore, further larger-scale clinical studies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05552573).


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Double-Blind Method , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Aged , Young Adult , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Vaccines, Virus-Like Particle/immunology , Vaccines, Virus-Like Particle/adverse effects , Vaccines, Virus-Like Particle/administration & dosage , Immunity, Cellular , China , Immunity, Humoral , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Vaccines, Subunit/immunology , Vaccines, Subunit/adverse effects , Vaccines, Subunit/administration & dosage , East Asian People
8.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1377014, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38694512

ABSTRACT

Background: Acute immune responses to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are influenced by variants, vaccination, and clinical severity. Thus, the outcome of these responses may differ between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients and those with and without COVID-19-related pneumonia. In this study, these differences during infection with the Omicron variant were investigated. Methods: A total of 67 patients (including 47 vaccinated and 20 unvaccinated patients) who were hospitalized within 5 days after COVID-19 symptom onset were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Serum neutralizing activity was evaluated using a pseudotyped virus assay and serum cytokines and chemokines were measured. Circulating follicular helper T cell (cTfh) frequencies were evaluated using flow cytometry. Results: Twenty-five patients developed COVID-19 pneumonia on hospitalization. Although the neutralizing activities against wild-type and Delta variants were higher in the vaccinated group, those against the Omicron variant as well as the frequency of developing pneumonia were comparable between the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. IL-6 and CXCL10 levels were higher in patients with pneumonia than in those without it, regardless of their vaccination status. Neutralizing activity against the Omicron variant were higher in vaccinated patients with pneumonia than in those without it. Moreover, a distinctive correlation between neutralizing activity against Omicron, IL-6 levels, and cTfh proportions was observed only in vaccinated patients. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates the existence of a characteristic relationship between neutralizing activity against Omicron, IL-6 levels, and cTfh proportions in Omicron breakthrough infection.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Interleukin-6 , SARS-CoV-2 , T Follicular Helper Cells , Humans , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/blood , Male , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Female , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Interleukin-6/blood , Interleukin-6/immunology , Middle Aged , Aged , T Follicular Helper Cells/immunology , Prospective Studies , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Adult , Breakthrough Infections
9.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1384417, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38726013

ABSTRACT

Nipah virus (NiV) poses a significant threat to human and livestock populations across South and Southeast Asia. Vaccines are required to reduce the risk and impact of spillover infection events. Pigs can act as an intermediate amplifying host for NiV and, separately, provide a preclinical model for evaluating human vaccine candidate immunogenicity. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the immunogenicity of an mRNA vectored NiV vaccine candidate in pigs. Pigs were immunized twice with 100 µg nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccine encoding soluble G glycoprotein from the Malaysia strain of NiV, formulated in lipid nanoparticles. Potent antigen-binding and virus neutralizing antibodies were detected in serum following the booster immunization. Antibody responses effectively neutralized both the Malaysia and Bangladesh strains of NiV but showed limited neutralization of the related (about 80% amino acid sequence identity for G) Hendra virus. Antibodies were also capable of neutralizing NiV glycoprotein mediated cell-cell fusion. NiV G-specific T cell cytokine responses were also measurable following the booster immunization with evidence for induction of both CD4 and CD8 T cell responses. These data support the further evaluation of mRNA vectored NiV G as a vaccine for both pigs and humans.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Henipavirus Infections , Nipah Virus , Viral Vaccines , Animals , Nipah Virus/immunology , Nipah Virus/genetics , Swine , Henipavirus Infections/prevention & control , Henipavirus Infections/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Swine Diseases/immunology , Swine Diseases/prevention & control , Swine Diseases/virology , RNA, Messenger/genetics , RNA, Messenger/immunology , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Immunization, Secondary , Cytokines/immunology , Vaccines, Synthetic/immunology , Liposomes , Nanoparticles
10.
Med Microbiol Immunol ; 213(1): 6, 2024 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722338

ABSTRACT

To date, there is no licensed vaccine for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Therefore, MERS-CoV is one of the diseases targeted by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) vaccine development programs and has been classified as a priority disease by the World Health Organization (WHO). An important measure of vaccine immunogenicity and antibody functionality is the detection of virus-neutralizing antibodies. We have developed and optimized a microneutralization assay (MNA) using authentic MERS-CoV and standardized automatic counting of virus foci. Compared to our standard virus neutralization assay, the MNA showed improved sensitivity when analyzing 30 human sera with good correlation of results (Spearman's correlation coefficient r = 0.8917, p value < 0.0001). It is important to use standardized materials, such as the WHO international standard (IS) for anti-MERS-CoV immunoglobulin G, to compare the results from clinical trials worldwide. Therefore, in addition to the neutralizing titers (NT50 = 1384, NT80 = 384), we determined the IC50 and IC80 of WHO IS in our MNA to be 0.67 IU/ml and 2.6 IU/ml, respectively. Overall, the established MNA is well suited to reliably quantify vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies with high sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus , Neutralization Tests , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/immunology , Humans , Neutralization Tests/methods , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Animals , Inhibitory Concentration 50 , Sensitivity and Specificity
11.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 18(5): e13309, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725111

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The newly emerged SARS-CoV-2 possesses shared antigenic epitopes with other human coronaviruses. We investigated if COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection may boost cross-reactive antibodies to other human coronaviruses. METHODS: Prevaccination and postvaccination sera from SARS-CoV-2 naïve healthy subjects who received three doses of the mRNA vaccine (BioNTech, BNT) or the inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac, CV) were used to monitor the level of cross-reactive antibodies raised against other human coronaviruses by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In comparison, convalescent sera from COVID-19 patients with or without prior vaccination history were also tested. Pseudoparticle neutralization assay was performed to detect neutralization antibody against MERS-CoV. RESULTS: Among SARS-CoV-2 infection-naïve subjects, BNT or CV significantly increased the anti-S2 antibodies against Betacoronaviruses (OC43 and MERS-CoV) but not Alphacoronaviruses (229E). The prevaccination antibody response to the common cold human coronaviruses did not negatively impact the postvaccination antibody response to SARS-CoV-2. Cross-reactive antibodies that binds to the S2 protein of MERS-CoV were similarly detected from the convalescent sera of COVID-19 patients with or without vaccination history. However, these anti-S2 antibodies do not possess neutralizing activity in MERS-CoV pseudoparticle neutralization tests. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination may potentially modulate population immune landscape against previously exposed or novel human coronaviruses. The findings have implications for future sero-epidemiological studies on MERS-CoV.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Cross Reactions , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Cross Reactions/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Adult , Male , Female , Vaccination , Middle Aged , Vaccines, Inactivated/immunology , Vaccines, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Neutralization Tests , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/immunology , Young Adult , mRNA Vaccines/immunology
12.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11896, 2024 05 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38789475

ABSTRACT

The immune effector mechanisms involved in protecting against severe COVID-19 infection in elderly nursing home residents following vaccination or natural infection are not well understood. Here, we measured SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S)-directed functional antibody responses, including neutralizing antibodies (NtAb) and antibody Fc-mediated NK cell activity (degranulation and IFNγ production), against the Wuhan-Hu-1, BA.4/5 (for NtAb), and Omicron XBB.1.5 variants in elderly nursing home residents (n = 39; median age, 91 years) before and following a third (pre- and post-3D) and a fourth (pre- and post-4D) mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose. Both 3D and 4D boosted NtAb levels against both (sub)variants. Likewise, 3D and 4D increased the ability of sera to trigger both LAMP1- and IFNγ-producing NK cells, in particular against XBB.1.5. In contrast to NtAb titres, the frequencies of LAMP1- and IFNγ-producing NK cells activated by antibodies binding to Wuhan-Hu-1 and Omicron XBB.1.5 S were comparable at all testing times. Stronger functional antibody responses were observed in vaccine-experienced participants compared to vaccine-naïve at some testing times. These findings can contribute to identifying a reliable correlate of protection in elderly nursing home residents against severe COVID-19 and inform future vaccine strategies in this population group.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Nursing Homes , SARS-CoV-2 , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus , Humans , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/genetics , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Female , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Male , Immunization, Secondary , Killer Cells, Natural/immunology , Aged , Vaccination/methods , Antibody Formation/immunology
13.
Viruses ; 16(5)2024 04 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38793554

ABSTRACT

Monitoring the long-term changes in antibody and cellular immunity following Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is crucial for understanding immune mechanisms that prevent reinfection. In March 2023, we recruited 167 participants from the Changning District, Shanghai, China. A subset of 66 participants that were infected between November 2022 and January 2023 was selected for longitudinal follow-up. The study aimed to investigate the dynamics of the immune response, including neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), anti-spike (S)-immunoglobulin G (IgG), anti-S-IgM, and lymphocyte profiles, by analyzing peripheral blood samples collected three to seven months post infection. A gradual decrease in NAbs and IgG levels were observed from three to seven months post infection. No significant differences in NAbs and IgG titers were found across various demographics, including age, sex, occupation, and symptomatic presentation, across five follow-up assessments. Additionally, a strong correlation between NAbs and IgG levels was identified. Lymphocyte profiles showed a slight change at five months but had returned to baseline levels by seven months post infection. Notably, healthcare workers exhibited lower B-cell levels compared to police officers. Our study demonstrated that the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection persisted for at least seven months. Similar patterns in the dynamics of antibody responses and cellular immunity were observed throughout this period.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 , Immunoglobulin G , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Male , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Female , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Adult , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Middle Aged , Longitudinal Studies , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Immunity, Cellular , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Health Personnel
14.
Viruses ; 16(5)2024 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38793563

ABSTRACT

A natural monkeypox virus infection may not induce sufficient neutralizing antibody responses in a subset of healthy individuals. The aim of this study was to evaluate monkeypox virus-neutralizing antibodies six months after infection and to assess the virological factors predictive of a poor immunological response. Antibodies were assessed using a plaque reduction neutralization test at six months from mpox infection; mpox cutaneous, oropharyngeal, and anal swabs, semen, and plasma samples were tested during infection. Overall, 95 people were included in the study; all developed detectable antibodies. People who were positive for the monkeypox virus for more days had higher levels of antibodies when considering all tested samples (p = 0.029) and all swabs (p = 0.005). Mpox cycle threshold values were not predictive of antibody titers. This study found that the overall days of monkeypox virus detection in the body, irrespective of the viral loads, were directly correlated with monkeypox virus neutralizing antibodies at six months after infection.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Monkeypox virus , Mpox (monkeypox) , Neutralization Tests , Viral Load , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Humans , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Monkeypox virus/immunology , Male , Mpox (monkeypox)/immunology , Mpox (monkeypox)/virology , Adult , Female , Middle Aged , Young Adult
15.
Viruses ; 16(5)2024 04 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38793591

ABSTRACT

In recent years, pseudorabies virus (PRV) variants have resulted in an epidemic in swine herds and huge economic losses in China. Therefore, it is essential to develop an efficacious vaccine against the spread of PRV variants. Here, the triple-gene-deletion virus and the triple-gene-deletion plus gC virus were constructed by homologous recombination (HR). And then, their growth capacity, proliferation ability, and immune efficacy were evaluated. The results showed that the growth kinetics of the recombinant viruses were similar to those of the parental strain PRV-AH. Compared with the triple-gene-deletion virus group, the more dominant level of neutralizing antibody (NA) can be induced in the triple-gene-deletion plus gC virus group with the same 106.0 TCID50 dose after 4 and 6 weeks post-initial immunization (PII) (p < 0.0001). In addition, the antibody titers in mice immunized with the triple-gene-deletion plus gC virus were significantly higher than those immunized with triple-gene deletion virus with the same 105.0 TCID50 dose after 6 weeks PII (p < 0.001). More importantly, in the triple-gene-deletion plus gC virus group with 105.0 TCID50, the level of NA was close to that in the triple-gene deletion virus group with 106.0 TCID50 at 6 weeks PII. Meanwhile, the cytokines IL-4 and IFN-γ in sera were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in each group. The highest level of IL-4 or IFN-γ was also elicited in the triple-gene deletion plus gC virus group at a dose of 106.0 TCID50. After challenge with PRV-AH, the survival rates of the triple-gene deletion plus gC virus immunized groups were higher than those of other groups. In immunized groups with 105.0 TCID50, the survival rate shows a significant difference between the triple-gene deletion plus gC virus group (75%, 6/8) and the triple-gene deletion virus group (12.5%, 1/8). In general, the immune efficacy of the PRV TK/gI/gE-deleted virus can be increased with additional gC insertion in mice, which has potential for developing an attenuated vaccine candidate for PRV control.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Gene Deletion , Herpesvirus 1, Suid , Pseudorabies Vaccines , Pseudorabies , Animals , Herpesvirus 1, Suid/genetics , Herpesvirus 1, Suid/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Mice , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Pseudorabies/prevention & control , Pseudorabies/immunology , Pseudorabies/virology , Pseudorabies Vaccines/immunology , Pseudorabies Vaccines/genetics , Pseudorabies Vaccines/administration & dosage , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Swine , Female , Viral Envelope Proteins/genetics , Viral Envelope Proteins/immunology , Homologous Recombination , Cytokines/metabolism , China
16.
Viruses ; 16(5)2024 05 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38793612

ABSTRACT

As dengue expands globally and many vaccines are under trials, there is a growing recognition of the need for assessing T cell immunity in addition to assessing the functions of neutralizing antibodies during these endeavors. While several dengue-specific experimentally validated T cell epitopes are known, less is understood about which of these epitopes are conserved among circulating dengue viruses and also shared by potential vaccine candidates. As India emerges as the epicenter of the dengue disease burden and vaccine trials commence in this region, we have here aligned known dengue specific T cell epitopes, reported from other parts of the world with published polyprotein sequences of 107 dengue virus isolates available from India. Of the 1305 CD4 and 584 CD8 epitopes, we found that 24% and 41%, respectively, were conserved universally, whereas 27% and 13% were absent in any viral isolates. With these data, we catalogued epitopes conserved in circulating dengue viruses from India and matched them with each of the six vaccine candidates under consideration (TV003, TDEN, DPIV, CYD-TDV, DENVax and TVDV). Similar analyses with viruses from Thailand, Brazil and Mexico revealed regional overlaps and variations in these patterns. Thus, our study provides detailed and nuanced insights into regional variation that should be considered for itemization of T cell responses during dengue natural infection and vaccine design, testing and evaluation.


Subject(s)
CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Dengue Vaccines , Dengue Virus , Dengue , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/immunology , Dengue Virus/immunology , Dengue Virus/genetics , Dengue Virus/classification , Humans , Dengue/immunology , Dengue/prevention & control , Dengue/virology , Dengue Vaccines/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , India , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Brazil , Thailand , Mexico , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood
17.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 4488, 2024 May 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802350

ABSTRACT

Understanding of infection dynamics is important for public health measures against monkeypox virus (MPXV) infection. Herein, samples from multiple body sites and environmental fomites of 77 acute MPXV infections (HIV co-infection: N = 42) were collected every two to three days and used for detection of MPXV DNA, surface protein specific antibodies and neutralizing titers. Skin lesions show 100% positivity rate of MPXV DNA, followed by rectum (88.16%), saliva (83.78%) and oropharynx (78.95%). Positivity rate of oropharynx decreases rapidly after 7 days post symptom onset (d.p.o), while the rectum and saliva maintain a positivity rate similar to skin lesions. Viral dynamics are similar among skin lesions, saliva and oropharynx, with a peak at about 6 d.p.o. In contrast, viral levels in the rectum peak at the beginning of symptom onset and decrease rapidly thereafter. 52.66% of environmental fomite swabs are positive for MPXV DNA, with highest positivity rate (69.89%) from air-conditioning air outlets. High seropositivity against A29L (100%) and H3L (94.74%) are detected, while a correlation between IgG endpoint titers and neutralizing titers is only found for A29L. Most indexes are similar between HIV and Non-HIV participants, while HIV and rectitis are associated with higher viral loads in rectum.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , Monkeypox virus , Mpox (monkeypox) , Virus Shedding , Humans , Male , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Prospective Studies , Adult , Monkeypox virus/immunology , Mpox (monkeypox)/immunology , Mpox (monkeypox)/virology , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Saliva/virology , Saliva/immunology , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/virology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Middle Aged , Longitudinal Studies , DNA, Viral , Oropharynx/virology , Oropharynx/immunology , Coinfection/immunology , Coinfection/virology , Coinfection/epidemiology , Viral Load , Fomites/virology
18.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1382911, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807606

ABSTRACT

Introduction: COVID-19 vaccines are highly effective in inducing protective immunity. While the serum antibody response to COVID-19 vaccination has been studied in depth, our knowledge of the underlying plasmablast and memory B cell (Bmem) responses is still incomplete. Here, we determined the antibody and B cell response to COVID-19 vaccination in a naïve population and contrasted it with the response to a single influenza vaccination in a primed cohort. In addition, we analyzed the antibody and B cell responses against the four endemic human coronaviruses (HCoVs). Methods: Measurement of specific plasma IgG antibodies was combined with functional analyses of antibody-secreting plasmablasts and Bmems. SARS-CoV-2- and HCoV-specific IgG antibodies were quantified with an in-house bead-based multiplexed immunoassay. Results: The antibody and B cell responses to COVID-19 vaccination reflected the kinetics of a prime-boost immunization, characterized by a slow and moderate primary response and a faster and stronger secondary response. In contrast, the influenza vaccinees possessed robust immune memory for the vaccine antigens prior to vaccination, and the recall vaccination moderately boosted antibody production and Bmem responses. Antibody levels and Bmem responses waned several months after the 2nd COVID-19 vaccination, but were restored upon the 3rd vaccination. The COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibodies mainly targeted novel, non-cross-reactive S1 epitopes of the viral spike protein, while cross-reactive S2 epitopes were less immunogenic. Booster vaccination not only strongly enhanced neutralizing antibodies against an original SARS-CoV-2 strain, but also induced neutralizing antibodies against the Omicron BA.2 variant. We observed a 100% plasma antibody prevalence against the S1 subunits of HCoVs, which was not affected by vaccination. Discussion: Overall, by complementing classical serology with a functional evaluation of plasmablasts and memory B cells we provide new insights into the specificity of COVID-19 vaccine-induced antibody and B cell responses.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Cross Reactions , Immunity, Humoral , Immunoglobulin G , Memory B Cells , Plasma Cells , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Memory B Cells/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Male , Adult , Cross Reactions/immunology , Female , Plasma Cells/immunology , Middle Aged , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Vaccination , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Immunologic Memory/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte/immunology , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Kinetics
19.
J Med Virol ; 96(6): e29710, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38804187

ABSTRACT

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), like other solid organ transplant recipients display a suboptimal response to mRNA vaccines, with only about half achieving seroconversion after two doses. However, the effectiveness of a booster dose, particularly in generating neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), remains poorly understood, as most studies have mainly focused on non-neutralizing antibodies. Here, we have longitudinally assessed the humoral response to the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in 40 KTRs over a year, examining changes in both anti-spike IgG and NAbs following a booster dose administered about 5 months post-second dose. We found a significant humoral response increase 5 months post-booster, a stark contrast to the attenuated response observed after the second dose. Of note, nearly a quarter of participants did not achieve protective plasma levels even after the booster dose. We also found that the higher estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) correlated with a more robust humoral response postvaccination. Altogether, these findings underscore the effectiveness of the booster dose in enhancing durable humoral immunity in KTRs, as evidenced by the protective level of NAbs found in 65% of the patients 5 months post- booster, especially those with higher eGFR rates.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Immunity, Humoral , Immunization, Secondary , Kidney Transplantation , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplant Recipients , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Female , Middle Aged , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Aged , Adult , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Monitoring, Immunologic/methods , mRNA Vaccines , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Longitudinal Studies
20.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2351664, 2024 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757508

ABSTRACT

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is a lethal beta-coronavirus that emerged in 2012. The virus is part of the WHO blueprint priority list with a concerning fatality rate of 35%. Scientific efforts are ongoing for the development of vaccines, anti-viral and biotherapeutics, which are majorly directed toward the structural spike protein. However, the ongoing effort is challenging due to conformational instability of the spike protein and the evasion strategy posed by the MERS-CoV. In this study, we have expressed and purified the MERS-CoV pre-fusion spike protein in the Expi293F mammalian expression system. The purified protein was extensively characterized for its biochemical and biophysical properties. Thermal stability analysis showed a melting temperature of 58°C and the protein resisted major structural changes at elevated temperature as revealed by fluorescence spectroscopy and circular dichroism. Immunological assessment of the MERS-CoV spike immunogen in BALB/c mice with AddaVaxTM and Imject alum adjuvants showed elicitation of high titer antibody responses but a more balanced Th1/Th2 response with AddaVaxTM squalene like adjuvant. Together, our results suggest the formation of higher-order trimeric pre-fusion MERS-CoV spike proteins, which were able to induce robust immune responses. The comprehensive characterization of MERS-CoV spike protein warrants a better understanding of MERS spike protein and future vaccine development efforts.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus , Viral Vaccines , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus/immunology , Animals , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/genetics , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Mice , Female , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Adjuvants, Vaccine , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...