Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Adv Ther ; 36(9): 2247-2259, 2019 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31385284

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: As continuous exposure to anticholinergics has been associated with adverse outcomes, accurately measuring exposure is important. However, no gold standard measure is available, and the performance of existing measures has not been compared. Our objective was to compare the properties of the Cumulative Anticholinergic Burden (CAB) measure against two existing measures of anticholinergic exposure and to assess their compatibility for use in observational studies based on claims data. METHODS: The average daily dose, cumulative dose and CAB measures were evaluated on: the applicability for use with anticholinergic burden scales, the ability to consider duration and/or accumulation of exposure, and consideration of anticholinergic dose, potency, and residual effect. To calculate each measure empirically, Truven MarketScan claims data from 2012 to 2015 were analyzed. Cumulative anticholinergic exposure over 1-year post-enrollment was calculated for each measure using Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden scale scores. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] and ranges of measure scores, and Spearman's correlation coefficients between measures, were estimated. Due to the differing methods of calculation, the absolute values of each score cannot be compared. RESULTS: The properties of the different measures varied, with only the CAB considering both dose and theoretical potency. The cohort included 99,742 individuals (mean age = 73.1 years; 54.9% female). Among individuals prescribed anticholinergics (n = 55,969), 1-year median (IQR) scores based on average daily dose, cumulative dose and CAB measures were 0.9 (0.3-1.5), 16.9 (7.3-33.9) and 203 (68-500), respectively. Measures were highly inter-correlated (r2 = 0.74-0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Considering both potency and dose, the CAB may prove a more comprehensive measure of anticholinergic burden; however, additional research is necessary to demonstrate whether it has any association with relevant health-related outcomes. FUNDING: Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.


Subject(s)
Anticholinergic Syndrome/etiology , Cholinergic Antagonists/adverse effects , Aged , Anticholinergic Syndrome/prevention & control , Cholinergic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Cognition Disorders/chemically induced , Cohort Studies , Data Analysis , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Retrospective Studies
2.
Geriatr Gerontol Int ; 19(7): 628-634, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31033150

ABSTRACT

AIM: The aim of this study was to develop the Korean Anticholinergic Burden Scale through assessment of previously developed tools, a literature review and a modified Delphi process. METHODS: We carried out a systematic review to identify previously published anticholinergic burden tools. A composite medication list was made by extracting medications and their quantitative grading from the existing tools, after excluding the medications not distributed in Korea and topical agents. We also added medications available in Korea that had not been rated. For medications with conflicting anticholinergic scores or no anticholinergic score, we determined the final score from 0 ("no anticholinergic effect") to 3 ("strong anticholinergic effect") with a literature review and expert consensus through a two-round Delphi process. RESULTS: A composite list of 655 medications with anticholinergic scores was extracted from 10 existing tools. A total of 38 medications available in Korea were added to the list. A total of 494 medications were deemed suitable for a Korean-specific scale. We confirmed the anticholinergic scores of 352 medications from existing scales, and 142 underwent the Delphi process. The final scores graded by experts showed high reliability among experts with an intra-class correlation of 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.97-0.98). Finally, 56 medications were categorized as strong anticholinergics, 23 as moderate, 59 as weak and 356 as having no anticholinergic activity. CONCLUSIONS: This newly created consensus-driven anticholinergic burden scale designed specifically for the Korean healthcare system might be a practical tool for assessing anticholinergic burden in older adults with polypharmacy in routine medication reviews and in research. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 628-634.


Subject(s)
Aging/drug effects , Anticholinergic Syndrome , Cholinergic Antagonists/pharmacology , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Potentially Inappropriate Medication List , Weights and Measures , Aged , Anticholinergic Syndrome/etiology , Anticholinergic Syndrome/prevention & control , Cholinergic Antagonists/classification , Delivery of Health Care/methods , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Delphi Technique , Humans , Polypharmacy , Republic of Korea
5.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 62(10): 1950-3, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25333528

ABSTRACT

The objective of this paper is to review articles published in 2013 examining drug-related problems in the elderly and comment on their potential impact on clinical practice. To identify articles, we did a systematic search of the English-language literature restricted to those aged 65 + from January 2013 to December 2013 using Medline and Google Scholar and a combination of the following search terms: drug-related problems, medication-related problems, medication errors, suboptimal prescribing, inappropriate prescribing, underutilization, polypharmacy, medication monitoring, medication dispensing, medication administration, medication adherence, adverse drug events, and adverse drug withdrawal events. A manual search of major general medicine and clinical pharmacology journals was also conducted to identify additional articles. A total of 51 articles were identified of which 20 were chosen to highlight. Three were annotated and critiqued and the additional 17 articles were summarized in an appendix. One article reported the results of a randomized controlled trial that showed that a pharmacist intervention successfully reduced suboptimal prescribing in older hospital patients. Another paper from this group previously reported data from the same study showing that the intervention also reduced medication related readmissions to the hospital. An observational study compared the use of two thiazide diuretics in older outpatients. They found that chlorthalidone was more likely to cause hypokalemia than hydrochlorothiazide. Finally, in a randomized controlled trial a pharmacist intervention resulted in the reduction of anticholinergic burden but did result in an improvement in cognition. These studies highlight that medication errors and adverse drug events continue to be important issues for health care professionals caring for older adults.


Subject(s)
Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Medication Reconciliation , Aged , Anticholinergic Syndrome/prevention & control , Cholinergic Antagonists/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic , Cognition Disorders/chemically induced , Cognition Disorders/prevention & control , Humans , Pharmacists , Professional Role , Sodium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...