Evaluating the cost utility of racecadotril in addition to oral rehydration solution versus oral rehydration solution alone for children with acute watery diarrhea in four low middle-income countries: Egypt, Morocco, Philippines and Vietnam.

AIM: To evaluate the cost utility of adjunct racecadotril and oral rehydration solution (R + ORS) versus oral rehydration solution (ORS) alone for the treatment of diarrhoea in children under five years with acute watery diarrhoea in four low-middle income countries. METHOD: A cost utility model, previously developed and independently validated, has been adapted to Egypt, Morocco, Philippines and Vietnam. The model is a decision tree, cohort model programmed in Microsoft Excel. The model structure represents the country-specific clinical pathways. The target population is children under the age of five years presenting with symptoms of acute watery diarrhea to an outpatient clinic or general physician practice. A healthcare payer perspective has been analysed with the model parameterised with local data, where available. Most recent cost data has been used to inform the drug, outpatient and inpatient costs. Uncertainty has been explored with univariate deterministic sensitivity. RESULTS: According to the base case models, R + ORS is dominant (cost-saving, more effective) versus ORS alone in Egypt, Morocco, Philippines and Vietnam. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in each country fall in the southeast (cost-saving, more effective) quadrant and represent a cost savings of -304,152 EGP per QALY gain in Egypt; -6,561 MAD per QALY gain in Morocco; -428,612 PHP per QALY gain in Philippines and -113,985,734 VND per QALY gain in Vietnam. Univariate deterministic sensitivity analysis shows that the three most influential parameters across all country adaptations are the utility of children without diarrhea; the utility of inpatient children with diarrhea and the cost of one night of inpatient care. CONCLUSION: In keeping with similar findings in upper-middle and high-income countries, the cost utility of R + ORS versus ORS is favourable in low-middle income countries for the treatment of children under five with acute watery diarrhoea.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARYDecision-makers rely on cost utility models to inform decisions about whether to publicly fund treatments as part of Universal Health Care. In low-middle income countries, the capacity to prepare cost utility models may be limited and using existing validated models is a practical solution to assist decision making. This study uses a cost utility model developed and independently validated for the United Kingdom, and adapts it to Philippines, Egypt, Morocco and Vietnam. The model evaluates the clinical benefit and economic impact of using racecadotril in addition to rehydration solution to treat diarrhoea in children. The results show that racecadotril is cost-saving and improves the quality of life for children in Philippines, Egypt, Morocco and Vietnam.

Health monitoring during water scarcity in Mayotte, France, 2017.

BACKGROUND: During the 2016-2017 austral summer, unprecedented water scarcity was observed in the south of Mayotte, French island in the Indian Ocean. Therefore, authorities introduced restrictive measures to save the water of this part of the island. The rationing system affected over 65,000 people, for four months. In order to detect a possible deterioration of the health situation, a strengthened epidemiological surveillance system was set up. METHODS: Surveillance focused on intestinal and skin diseases, which are often associated with a lack of hygiene or poor-quality drinking and bathing water. Three pathologies were monitored: acute diarrhoea, acute gastroenteritis and skin diseases and also, proportion of antidiarrhoeal and rehydration solutions sales in pharmacies. Cases of leptospirosis were also under surveillance. The analyses consisted of comparing the collected data according to the areas that were either affected or not affected by the water restrictions. Comparisons with historical data were also made. RESULTS: Although none of the surveillance systems were able to demonstrate any impact on skin diseases, they revealed a very sharp increase in the proportion of consultations for acute diarrhoea and gastro-enteritis in the southern area. This was corroborated by a high increase in the sales of antidiarrhoeals and oral rehydration solutions via the sentinel pharmacists in the south of the island compared with those of the north. Comparison with historical data highlighted the occurrence of an unusual situation. CONCLUSION: These water restrictions caused a real deterioration in the health status of the inhabitants who were deprived of water.

Budgetary Impact of Telotristat Ethyl, a Novel Treatment for Patients with Carcinoid Syndrome Diarrhea: A US Health Plan Perspective.

PURPOSE: Telotristat ethyl (TE) was recently approved for carcinoid syndrome diarrhea (CSD) in patients not adequately controlled with somatostatin analog long-acting release (SSA LAR) therapy alone. A budget impact model was developed to determine the short-term affordability of reimbursing TE in a US health plan. METHODS: A budget impact model compared health care costs when CSD is managed per current treatment patterns (SSA LAR, reference drug scenario) versus when TE is incorporated in the treatment algorithm (SSA LAR + TE, new drug scenario). Prevalence of CSD, proportion of patients not adequately controlled on SSA LAR, monthly treatment costs (pharmacy and medical), and treatment efficacy were derived from the literature. In the reference drug scenario, an escalated monthly dose of SSA LAR therapy of 40 mg was assumed to treat patients with CSD not adequately controlled on the labeled dose of SSA LAR. In the new drug scenario, TE was added to the maximum labeled monthly dose of SSA LAR therapy of 30 mg. The incremental budget impact was calculated based on an assumed TE market uptake of 28%, 42%, and 55% during Years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses were conducted to test model assumptions. FINDINGS: A hypothetical health plan of 1 million members was estimated to have 42 prevalent CSD patients of whom 17 would be inadequately controlled on SSA LAR therapy. The monthly medical cost per patient not adequately controlled on SSA LAR in addition to pharmacotherapy was estimated to be $3946 based on the literature. Based on the observed treatment response in a clinical trial of 20% and 44% for the base case reference and new drug scenarios, total per patient per month costs were estimated to be $7563 and $11,205, respectively. Total annual costs in the new drug scenario were estimated to be $2.3 to $2.5 million during the first 3 years. The overall incremental annual costs were estimated to be $154,000 in Year 1, $231,000 in Year 2, and $302,000 in Year 3. This translated to an incremental per patient per month cost of $0.013, $0.019, and $0.025 for Years 1, 2, and 3. These results remained robust in 1-way sensitivity analyses. IMPLICATIONS: The availability of TE for patients not adequately controlled on SSA LAR therapy provides a novel treatment option for CSD. This model showed that providing access to this first-in-class oral agent would have a minimal budget impact to a US health plan.

Economic burden of inadequate symptom control among US commercially insured patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea.

AIMS: To assess healthcare resource use and costs among irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with diarrhea (IBS-D) patients with and without evidence of inadequate symptom control on current prescription therapies and estimate incremental all-cause costs associated with inadequate symptom control. METHODS: IBS-D patients aged ≥18 years with ≥1 medical claim for IBS (ICD-9-CM 564.1x) and either ≥2 claims for diarrhea (ICD-9-CM 787.91, 564.5x), ≥1 claim for diarrhea plus ≥1 claim for abdominal pain (ICD-9-CM 789.0x), or ≥1 claim for diarrhea plus ≥1 pharmacy claim for a symptom-related prescription within 1 year of an IBS diagnosis were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan database. Inadequate symptom control, resource use, and costs were assessed up to 1 year following the index date. Inadequate symptom control included any of the following: (1) switch or (2) addition of new symptom-related therapy; (3) IBS-D-related inpatient or emergency room (ER) admission; (4) IBS-D-related medical procedure; (5) diagnosis of condition indicating treatment failure; or (6) use of a more aggressive prescription. Generalized linear models assessed incremental costs of inadequate symptom control. RESULTS: Of 20,624 IBS-D patients (mean age = 48.5 years; 77.8% female), 66.4% had evidence of inadequate symptom control. Compared to those without inadequate symptom control, patients with evidence of inadequate symptom control had significantly more hospitalizations (12.0% vs 6.0%), ER visits (37.1% vs 22.6%), use of outpatient services (73.0% vs 60.7%), physician office visits (mean 11.0 vs 8.1), and prescription fills (mean 40.0 vs 26.7) annually (all p < .01). Incremental costs associated with inadequate symptom control were $3,065 (2013 US dollars), and were driven by medical service costs ($2,391; 78%). LIMITATIONS: Study included US commercially insured patients only and inferred IBS-D status and inadequate symptom control from claims. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate symptom control associated with available IBS-D therapies represents a significant economic burden for both payers and IBS-D patients.

Calcium-sensing receptor: A new target for therapy of diarrhea.

Management of acute diarrhea remains a global challenge, particularly in resource-limiting countries. Oral rehydration solution (ORS), a passive rehydrating therapy developed approximately 40 years ago, remains the mainstay treatment. Although ORS is effective for hydration, since it does not inhibit enterotoxin-mediated excessive secretion, reduced absorption and compromised barrier function - the primary mechanisms of diarrhea, ORS does not offer a rapid relief of diarrhea symptom. There are a few alternative therapies available, yet the use of these drugs is limited by their expense, lack of availability and/or safety concerns. Novel anti-diarrheal therapeutic approaches, particularly those simple affordable therapies, are needed. This article explores intestinal calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR), a newly uncovered target for therapy of diarrhea. Unlike others, targeting this host antidiarrheal receptor system appears "all-inclusive": it is anti-secretory, pro-absorptive, anti-motility, and anti-inflammatory. Thus, activating CaSR reverses changes of both secretory and inflammatory diarrheas. Considering its unique property of using simple nutrients such as calcium, polyamines, and certain amino acids/oligopeptides as activators, it is possible that through targeting of CaSR with a combination of specific nutrients, novel oral rehydrating solutions that are inexpensive and practical to use in all countries may be developed.

A case study in generic drug use: should there be risk adjustment in incentive payments for the use of generic medications?

BACKGROUND: Encouraging generic drug use has reduced health care costs for payers and consumers, but the availability of therapeutically interchangeable medications or generic medications of choice is not equal across disease states. The extent to which systems of care are able to substitute with generics is not well understood.  OBJECTIVES: To (a) define and measure the maximum generic rate (MGR) of currently prescribed drugs within an academic medical group in and (b) illustrate differences across drugs associated with selected underlying diseases.   METHODS: Prescription claims data were examined from an academic medical group in Chicago, Illinois. Based on pharmacologic and therapeutic criteria, drugs were classified into 2 categories-potentially substitutable and not potentially substitutable-based on whether the drugs are branded forms of the same chemical entities that are available as generics or are therapeutically interchangeable with other medications that have different chemical compositions but the same mechanisms of action and potential efficacy. A medication was considered potentially substitutable if it (a) did not have a narrow therapeutic index as defined by the FDA; (b) did not belong to 1 of 6 protected classes of drugs in the Medicare D provisions; (c) was substitutable with a generic medication containing the same chemical entity; or (d) was therapeutically interchangeable with a therapeutically equivalent medication. MGR was defined as the percentage of prescriptions that could potentially be prescribed in generic form. This rate was examined overall and across drugs known to be associated with illustrative diseases including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and obstructive lung diseases.   RESULTS: The MGR ranged from 100% for drugs used in hypertension to 26.7% for drugs used in obstructive lung diseases. The MGR was 83.6%.  CONCLUSIONS: Payers wishing to promote generic substitution should incorporate the potential for substitution of clinically appropriate generic medications as part of incentives for generic utilization to avoid unintended consequences of using a fixed target rate. A practical methodology for determining an MGR is offered.

Bismuth salicylate for diarrhea in children.

QUESTION: Recently, I had a visit from a 5-year-old patient who had been given bismuth subsalicylate for a diarrheal illness by a local family physician during a trip to South America. Is this a practice we should encourage? ANSWER: Research from developing countries has found the use of bismuth subsalicylate to be effective in shortening the duration of diarrheal illness. Despite these findings, its limited effectiveness and concerns about it potentially causing Reye syndrome, compliance, and cost are the key reasons it is not routinely recommended for children.

Prospective evaluation of indirect costs due to acute rotavirus gastroenteritis in Spain: the ROTACOST study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of rotavirus in developed countries is mainly economic. This study aimed to assess the indirect costs induced by rotavirus acute gastroenteritis (RVAGE) in Spain. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted from October 2008 to June 2009. It included 682 children up to 5 years of age with acute gastroenteritis (AGE) who attended primary care (n = 18) and emergency room/hospital settings (n = 10), covering the regions of Galicia and Asturias (North-west Spain). All non-medical expenses incurred throughout the episode were recorded in detail using personal interviews and telephone contact. RESULTS: Among the 682 enrolled children, 207 (30.4%) were rotavirus positive and 170 (25%) had received at least one dose of rotavirus vaccine. The mean (standard deviation) indirect cost caused by an episode of AGE was estimated at 135.17 (182.70) Euros. Costs were 1.74-fold higher when AGE was caused by rotavirus compared with other etiologies: 192.7 (219.8) Euros vs. 111.6 (163.5) Euros (p < .001). The costs for absenteeism were the most substantial with a mean of 91.41 (134.76) Euros per family, resulting in a loss of 2.45 (3.17) days of work. In RVAGE patients, the absenteeism cost was 120.4 (154) Euros compared with 75.8 (123) for the other etiologies (p = .002), because of loss of 3.5 (3.6) vs 1.9 (2.9) days of work (p < .001). Meals costs were 2-fold-higher (48.5 (55) vs 24.3 (46) Euros, p < .001) and travel costs were 2.6-fold-higher (32 (92) vs 12.5 (21.1) Euros, p = .005) in RVAGE patients compared with those with other etiologies. There were no differences between RVAGE and other etiologies groups regarding costs of hiring of caregivers or purchase of material. Patients with RVAGE were admitted to hospital more frequently than those with other etiologies (47.8% vs 14%, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Rotavirus generates a significant indirect economic burden. Our data should be considered in the decision-making process of the eventual inclusion of rotavirus vaccine in the national immunization schedule of well developed countries.

Prospective randomized double-blind trial of racecadotril compared with loperamide in elderly people with gastroenteritis living in nursing homes.

AIM: Our aim was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of loperamide and racecadotril in elderly patients with acute diarrhea. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a randomized, prospective, double-blind, and parallel group design implemented in geriatric nursing homes in Catanzaro, Italy, from February 2008 to March 2009. Patients of both sexes were randomly allocated to receive either one tablet of racecadotril 100 mg every 8 h or two tablets of loperamide 2.0 mg followed by one tablet after each unformed stool, up to four tablets in any 24-h period. Patients were treated until recovery, defined as the production of two consecutive normal stools or no stool production for a period of 12 h. RESULTS: Normal stools were collected 36 +/- 4 h after the beginning of racecadotril and in 63 +/- 6 h from the beginning of loperamide administration (P < 0.01). The median time of abdominal pain in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population was 14 h for racecadotril and 28 h for loperamide. In the per-protocol (PP) population, the median time of abdominal pain was 14 h for racecadotril and 32 h for loperamide (P < 0.01). About the 50% of patients experienced at least one adverse event during the study: 12% in the racecadotril group and 60% in the loperamide group. The most frequently occurring adverse events were nausea and constipation. Genetic analysis did not report the presence of rapid or poor metabolizers. Pharmacoeconomic analysis performed at the end of our study documented an increase in costs in the loperamide group with respect to the racecadotril group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Racecadotril is more effective than loperamide-probably due to drug interaction with loperamide-and it is not related to pharmacogenetic susceptibility. Racecadotril is also more cost effective than loperamide.

Resource utilization and costs of treating severe rotavirus diarrhea in young Mexican children from the health care provider perspective.

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus is the most common cause of severe diarrhea in infants. The economic costs of treating severe rotavirus can be quite significant and are important to include in any evaluation of prevention programs. The aim of this study was to determine utilization of health care resources and costs incurred due to severe diarrhea associated with rotavirus infection in Mexican children < 5 years of age. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The costs of rotavirus infection evaluated in this observational study consisted of hospital, emergency room care and out-patient visit expenses at three hospitals of the Mexican Institute of Social Security throughout 1999-2000. Service costs were estimated from costs of care for rotavirus versus non-rotavirus diarrhea obtained through a follow-up study data of 383 children and administrative records. RESULTS: Diarrhea cases due to rotavirus infection comprised 36% of the sample. Participants with rotavirus diarrhea spent an average of 3.2 days in the hospital, 5.9 hours in the emergency room, and had 1.3 visits to an outpatient physician's office. Some differences in the consumption of health care were found between rotavirus and non-rotavirus diarrhea cases, although the mean costs of rotavirus and nonrotavirus cases were not significantly different. The mean cost per case of severe rotavirus diarrhea was estimated to be US $936. The total cost of treating severe rotavirus diarrhea, including 5,955 rotavirus hospitalizations for 2004, was estimated at US $5.5 million. CONCLUSION: Health care costs due to treatment for severe rotavirus diarrhea are a significant economic burden to the Mexican Social Security system.