Clinical experience with Tolvaptan outpatient use. Cost and effectiveness in 9 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Tolvaptan introduction has constituted the main therapeutic novelty in the management of hyponatremia in recent years. OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience with this drug at Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, Spain. METHOD: Retrospective, observational study of tolvaptan outpatient use in a tertiary care hospital from March 2014 to August 2017. RESULTS: A total of 9 patients were treated with tolvaptan in the outpatient setting. Eunatremia was reached in 24 h by 23.1%. After tolvaptan administration, a reduction in days of hospitalization was recorded (361 vs. 70; p = 0.007), especially in those days of hospitalization that were attributable to hyponatremia (306 vs. 49; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term use of tolvaptan appears to be safe and is associated with a decrease in days of hospitalization.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La introducción de tolvaptan ha supuesto la principal novedad en el tratamiento de la hiponatremia en los últimos años. OBJETIVO: Describir la experiencia con tolvaptan en el Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, España. MÉTODO: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de utilización ambulatoria de tolvaptan en un hospital de tercer nivel, de marzo de 2014 a agosto de 2017. RESULTADOS: Fueron tratados con tolvaptan de forma ambulatoria nueve pacientes, 23.1 % alcanzó eunatremia en 24 horas. Posterior a la administración de tolvaptan se registró reducción en días de hospitalización (361 versus 70, p = 0.007), especialmente por hiponatremia (306 versus 49, p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONES: El uso a largo plazo de tolvaptan parece ser seguro y se relaciona con descenso en los días de hospitalización.

Experiencia clínica con el uso ambulatorio de tolvaptan. Costes y efectividad en nueve casos / Clinical experience with Tolvaptan outpatient use. Cost and effectiveness in 9 cases

Resumen Introducción: La introducción de tolvaptan ha supuesto la principal novedad en el tratamiento de la hiponatremia en los últimos años. Objetivo: Describir la experiencia con tolvaptan en el Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, España. Método: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de utilización ambulatoria de tolvaptan en un hospital de tercer nivel, de marzo de 2014 a agosto de 2017. Resultados: Fueron tratados con tolvaptan de forma ambulatoria nueve pacientes, 23.1 % alcanzó eunatremia en 24 horas. Posterior a la administración de tolvaptan se registró reducción en días de hospitalización (361 versus 70, p = 0.007), especialmente por hiponatremia (306 versus 49, p = 0.009). Conclusiones: El uso a largo plazo de tolvaptan parece ser seguro y se relaciona con descenso en los días de hospitalización.

Abstract Introduction: Tolvaptan introduction has constituted the main therapeutic novelty in the management of hyponatremia in recent years. Objective: To describe the experience with this drug at Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, Spain. Method: Retrospective, observational study of tolvaptan outpatient use in a tertiary care hospital from March 2014 to August 2017. Results: A total of 9 patients were treated with tolvaptan in the outpatient setting. Eunatremia was reached in 24 h by 23.1%. After tolvaptan administration, a reduction in days of hospitalization was recorded (361 vs. 70; p = 0.007), especially in those days of hospitalization that were attributable to hyponatremia (306 vs. 49; p = 0.009). Conclusions: Long-term use of tolvaptan appears to be safe and is associated with a decrease in days of hospitalization.

Economic impact of tolvaptan treatment vs. fluid restriction based on real-world data among hospitalized patients with heart failure and hyponatremia.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost difference associated with tolvaptan treatment vs. fluid restriction (FR) among hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF) and hyponatremia (HN) based on a real-world registry of HN patients. METHODS: An Excel-based economic model was developed to evaluate the cost impact of tolvaptan treatment vs. FR. Model input for hospital length of stay (LOS) was based on published data from the Hyponatremia Registry (HNR). Based on HNR data, tolvaptan-treated patients had a 2-day (median) shorter LOS compared to FR. Real-world effectiveness of tolvaptan treatment from the HNR was applied to a national sample of inpatients visits from the Premier Hospital database to estimate the potential LOS-related cost difference between tolvaptan treatment and FR. A one-way sensitivity and multivariable Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Economic modeling results of the base-case analysis indicated that among hospitalized patients with HF, the hospital cost per admission, not including HN drug cost, was $3453 lower among patients treated with tolvaptan vs. FR, due to the shorter LOS associated with tolvaptan treatment. At wholesale acquisition cost of $362 per day and an average treatment duration of 3.2 days, the pharmacy cost of tolvaptan treatment per admission was estimated at $1157. Thus, after factoring the decrease in hospital medical costs and increase in pharmacy costs associated with tolvaptan treatment, results indicated a cost-offset opportunity of -$2296 per admission for patients treated with tolvaptan versus FR. Results of the sensitivity analyses were consistent with the base-case analysis. LIMITATIONS: The model derives inputs from real-world observational data. No causal relationship can be inferred from this analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this economic analysis, tolvaptan treatment vs. FR among hospitalized patients with HF and HN may be associated with lower hospital-related costs, which offset the increase in pharmacy costs associated with tolvaptan treatment.

Utilization and budget impact of tolvaptan in the inpatient setting among patients with heart failure and hyponatremia.

OBJECTIVE: Assess characteristics of patients with heart failure (HF) and hyponatremia (HN) using tolvaptan, a selective vasopressin V2-receptor antagonist, for sodium correction, and estimate the budget impact of tolvaptan use in a hospital. METHODS: The Premier hospital database was analyzed to assess the utilization of tolvaptan, characteristics of users and non-users, and hospitalization costs among patients with HF and HN. Using these findings, a model was developed to estimate tolvaptan costs in proportion to total medical costs of managing patients with HF and HN, and the budget impact of tolvaptan use. Results were regenerated using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) database, and robustness was assessed in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Tolvaptan was used in 4.96% of inpatient visits among patients with HF and HN, more commonly among sicker patients as reflected in high utilization during intensive care stays (30.46%). Additionally, utilization increased by length of stay, which can serve as a proxy for disease severity. The model estimated that tolvaptan costs accounted for 0.3% of total hospitalization-related costs for patients with HF and HN, and the budget impact was $52.42 per visit. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate that tolvaptan is used infrequently among patients with HF and HN, and is utilized among sicker patients. Tolvaptan accounted for 0.3% of total spending on management of inpatient visits with HF and HN, and had a marginal impact on hospital budget when compared with fluid restriction for HN correction. Availability of tolvaptan can provide an additional therapeutic option for sodium correction.

An economic analysis of tolvaptan compared with fluid restriction among hospitalized patients with hyponatremia.

OBJECTIVE: The vasopressin-receptor antagonist tolvaptan is used for the treatment of hyponatremia (HN) in hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) or syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). The objective of this economic modeling study was to assess the potential cost and health outcomes associated with tolvaptan in comparison with fluid restriction (FR). METHODS: A decision-analytic model was developed to estimate potential cost and health outcomes associated with tolvaptan compared with FR among hospitalized CHF and SIADH patients with severe HN (serum sodium [SS] levels < 125 mEq/L). The model, which was populated with data from the published literature, assumes that response to treatment influences hospital length of stay, probability of an intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and probability of a 30-day all-cause hospital readmission. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) assessed the influence of parameter uncertainty on model results. RESULTS: Model results suggest that, among hospitalized CHF patients with severe HN, the use of tolvaptan compared with FR may lead to reductions of 7.2% and 4.6% in ICU admissions and 30-day readmissions, respectively. Compared with FR, tolvaptan may result in total cost-savings of $156 per hospitalized CHF patient. Among hospitalized SIADH patients with severe HN, the model suggested reductions of 14.6% and 5.1% in ICU admissions and 30-day readmissions, respectively. Compared with FR, tolvaptan may result in total cost-savings of $135 per hospitalized SIADH patient. PSAs found that the probabilities of net cost-savings from the use of tolvaptan compared with FR were 64% and 59% among patients with severe HN with CHF and SIADH, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Decision-analytic modeling based on published data for hospitalized CHF and SIADH patients with severe HN, indicates that tolvaptan compared with FR has the potential to improve health outcomes and produce cost-savings that more than offset the cost of tolvaptan.

Cost-effectiveness of tolvaptan for euvolemic or hypervolemic hyponatremia.

PURPOSE: Tolvaptan is clinically effective in increasing serum sodium concentrations for patients with euvolemic or hypervolemic hyponatremia. Appropriate treatment of hyponatremia may reduce the risk of death, hospital resource utilization, and economic burden. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of tolvaptan treatment in patients who need to be hospitalized for treatment and monitoring of euvolemic or hypervolemic hyponatremia. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was constructed to assess the clinical and economic impact of tolvaptan compared with placebo during a 1-month treatment period. The probabilities, utility weights, resource utilization, and costs in the model were derived from clinical trials, survey research, and the Korean National Health Insurance database. Cost analysis was performed from the perspective of the South Korean health care setting in 2012 Korean won (KRW). The model outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed to identify the cost-effectiveness in case of tolvaptan treatment only for patients with marked hyponatremia. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed on key model parameters and assumptions. FINDINGS: The total cost per patient was KRW 1,826,771 for tolvaptan treatment and KRW 2,281,926 for placebo. The quality-adjusted life-years for treatment with and without tolvaptan were 0.0481 and 0.0446, respectively. The base-case analysis revealed that tolvaptan was a more effective and less expensive strategy compared with placebo. In the subgroup analysis, this trend was more apparent in case of tolvaptan treatment only for patients with marked hyponatremia. The robustness of the results was confirmed by using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. IMPLICATIONS: This cost-effectiveness analysis found that the use of tolvaptan was less expensive and more effective than treatment without tolvaptan in patients with euvolemic or hypervolemic hyponatremia.