Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.896
Filter
1.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 679, 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831450

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of concurrent simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) combined with nimotuzumab in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). METHODS: Eligible patients were histologically proven to have locally advanced ESCC, and were unable to tolerate or refuse concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Enrolled patients underwent concurrent SIB-IMRT in combination with nimotuzumab. SIB-IMRT: For the planning target volume of clinical target volume (PTV-C), the prescription dose was 50.4 Gy/28fractions, 1.8 Gy/fraction, 5fractions/week, concurrently, the planning target volume of gross tumor (PTV-G) undergone an integrated boost therapy, with a prescription dose of 63 Gy/28fractions, 2.25 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week. Nimotuzumab was administered concurrently with radiotherapy, 200 mg/time, on D1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36, with a total accumulation of 1200 mg through intravenous infusion. The primary endpoint of the study was the safety and efficacy of the combined treatment regimen, and the secondary endpoints were 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year local control and survival outcomes. RESULTS: (1) From December 2018 to August 2021, 35 patients with stage II-IVA ESCC were enrolled and 34 patients completed the full course of radiotherapy and the intravenous infusion of full-dose nimotuzumab. The overall completion rate of the protocol was 97.1%. (2) No grade 4-5 adverse events occurred in the entire group. The most common treatment-related toxicity was acute radiation esophagitis, with a total incidence of 68.6% (24/35). The incidence of grade 2 and 3 acute esophagitis was 25.7% (9/35) and 17.1% (6/35), respectively. The incidence of acute radiation pneumonitis was 8.6% (3/35), including one case each of Grades 1, 2, and 3 pneumonitis. Adverse events in other systems included decreased blood cells, hypoalbuminemia, electrolyte disturbances, and skin rash. Among these patients, five experienced grade 3 electrolyte disturbances during the treatment period (three with grade 3 hyponatremia and two with grade 3 hypokalemia). (3) Efficacy: The overall CR rate was 22.8%, PR rate was 71.4%, ORR rate was 94.2%, and DCR rate was 97.1%.(4) Local control and survival: The 1-, 2-, and 3-year local control (LC) rate, progression-free survival(PFS) rate, and overall survival(OS) rate for the entire group were 85.5%, 75.4%, and 64.9%; 65.7%, 54.1%, and 49.6%; and 77.1%, 62.9%, and 54.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of SIB-IMRT and nimotuzumab for locally advanced esophageal cancer demonstrated good feasibility, safety and efficacy. It offered potential benefits in local control and survival. Acute radiation esophagitis was the primary treatment-related toxicity, which is clinically manageable. This comprehensive treatment approach is worthy of further clinical exploration (ChiCTR1900027936).


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Chemoradiotherapy , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Humans , Male , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Female , Middle Aged , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/mortality , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Esophageal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
2.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0300171, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701062

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the treatment efficacy of intra-arterial (IA) trastuzumab treatment using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a human breast cancer xenograft model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human breast cancer cells (BT474) were stereotaxically injected into the brains of nude mice to obtain a xenograft model. The mice were divided into four groups and subjected to different treatments (IA treatment [IA-T], intravenous treatment [IV-T], IA saline injection [IA-S], and the sham control group). MRI was performed before and at 7 and 14 d after treatment to assess the efficacy of the treatment. The tumor volume, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI parameters (Ktrans, Kep, Ve, and Vp) were measured. RESULTS: Tumor volumes in the IA-T group at 14 d after treatment were significantly lower than those in the IV-T group (13.1 mm3 [interquartile range 8.48-16.05] vs. 25.69 mm3 [IQR 20.39-30.29], p = 0.005), control group (IA-S, 33.83 mm3 [IQR 32.00-36.30], p<0.01), and sham control (39.71 mm3 [IQR 26.60-48.26], p <0.001). The ADC value in the IA-T group was higher than that in the control groups (IA-T, 7.62 [IQR 7.23-8.20] vs. IA-S, 6.77 [IQR 6.48-6.87], p = 0.044 and vs. sham control, 6.89 [IQR 4.93-7.48], p = 0.004). Ktrans was significantly decreased following the treatment compared to that in the control groups (p = 0.002 and p<0.001 for vs. IA-S and sham control, respectively). Tumor growth was decreased in the IV-T group compared to that in the sham control group (25.69 mm3 [IQR 20.39-30.29] vs. 39.71 mm3 [IQR 26.60-48.26], p = 0.27); there was no significant change in the MRI parameters. CONCLUSION: IA treatment with trastuzumab potentially affects the early response to treatment, including decreased tumor growth and decrease of Ktrans, in a preclinical brain tumor model.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Injections, Intra-Arterial , Mice, Nude , Trastuzumab , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , Trastuzumab/administration & dosage , Trastuzumab/pharmacology , Trastuzumab/therapeutic use , Animals , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Mice , Cell Line, Tumor , Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Tumor Burden/drug effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Mice, Inbred BALB C
3.
Recenti Prog Med ; 115(5): 1e-6e, 2024 May.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708539

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-Hnscc) is a true therapeutical challenge in the modern era and the scientific community is trying to face this challenge with new therapeutical strategies, including combinations of monoclonal antibodies and radiation therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes in LA-Hnscc patients unfit to receive platinum-based chemotherapy, treated with concurrent simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy (Sib-Imrt) + cetuximab (Ctx) in daily clinical practice. METHODS: LA-Hnscc patients not included in other prospective studies treated in 4 Italian radiotherapy units (2 Messina, 1 Rome, and 1 Lecce) using Sib-Imrt and Ctx were included in this study. Acute and late toxicities and overall survival (OS) have been evaluated. RESULTS: Data regarding 27 patients with squamous tumour were collected and reviewed. The primary tumour sites were oropharynx in 14 patients (51.9%), oral cavity in 7 (25.9%), larynx in 3 (11%) and other sites in 3(11%). There were 20 (74%) patients had stage IV (16 IVa and 4 IVb). Complete remission was observed in 18 patients (66.7%), a partial remission in 4 (14.8%) whilst 4 had a progression disease (14.8%). After 3 year of follow-up 7/27 patients were deaths. The OS was 95.5%, 62.5% and 52.9% respectively at 1,2 and 3 years. Acute toxicities were observed in all treated patients (mucositis, dermatitis and dysphagia) while 66.7% of patients developed late toxicities. All observed toxicities were grade 1 to 3 and just 1 patient developed a G4 toxicity. CONCLUSION: The concurrent bio-radiotherapy of Sib-Imrt and cetuximab is feasible in real-life daily clinical practice for LA-Hnscc patients unfit for platinum-based chemoradiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Cetuximab , Chemoradiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Humans , Cetuximab/administration & dosage , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/radiotherapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/drug therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Italy , Survival Rate , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Staging , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies
4.
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst ; 36(1): 14, 2024 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38705953

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab (Nivo) and ipilimumab (Ipi) have revolutionized cancer treatment by targeting different pathways. Their combination shows promising results in various cancers, including melanoma, but not all studies have demonstrated significant benefits. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness and safety of Nivo-Ipi compared to Nivo alone in advanced cancer types (excluding melanoma). METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a meta-analysis up to September 30, 2023, searching databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We focused on advanced solid malignancies (excluding melanoma) with specific Nivo and Ipi dosing. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), grades 3-4 adverse events (AEs), and treatment-related discontinuations. Secondary outcomes included specific adverse events. Statistical analysis in Review Manager included hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio (RR), assessing heterogeneity (Higgins I2). RESULTS: Nine RCTs, involving 2152 patients covering various malignancies, were analyzed. The Nivo plus Ipi group exhibited a median OS of 12.3 months and a median PFS of 3.73 months, compared to monotherapy with 11.67 months and 3.98 months, respectively. OS showed no significant difference between Nivo and Ipi combination and Nivo alone (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.88 to 1.08, p = 0.61). PFS had a slight improvement with combination therapy (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.00, p = 0.04). Treatment-related cumulative grades 3-4 adverse events were higher with Nivo and Ipi (RR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.78, p < 0.00001), as were treatment-related discontinuations (RR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.46 to 2.70, p < 0.0001). Hepatotoxicity (RR = 2.42, 95% CI: 1.39 to 4.24, p = 0.002), GI toxicity (RR = 2.84, 95% CI: 1.44 to 5.59, p = 0.002), pneumonitis (RR = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.24 to 2.23, p = 0.008), dermatitis (RR = 2.96, 95% CI: 1.08 to 8.14, p = 0.04), and endocrine dysfunction (RR = 6.22, 95% CI: 2.31 to 16.71, p = 0.0003) were more frequent with Nivo and Ipi. CONCLUSIONS: Combining nivolumab and ipilimumab did not significantly improve overall survival compared to nivolumab alone in advanced cancers (except melanoma). However, it did show slightly better PFS at the cost of increased toxicity, particularly grades 3-4 adverse events. Specific AEs occurred more frequently in the combination group. Further trials are needed to fully assess this combination in treating advanced cancers.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Ipilimumab , Neoplasms , Nivolumab , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Ipilimumab/administration & dosage , Ipilimumab/adverse effects , Ipilimumab/therapeutic use , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/pathology , Nivolumab/administration & dosage , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Progression-Free Survival , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
5.
N Engl J Med ; 390(19): 1756-1769, 2024 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38749033

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy significantly improves outcomes in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Perioperative treatment (i.e., neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy) with nivolumab may further improve clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial, we assigned adults with resectable stage IIA to IIIB NSCLC to receive neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus placebo every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by surgery and adjuvant nivolumab or placebo every 4 weeks for 1 year. The primary outcome was event-free survival according to blinded independent review. Secondary outcomes were pathological complete response and major pathological response according to blinded independent review, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: At this prespecified interim analysis (median follow-up, 25.4 months), the percentage of patients with 18-month event-free survival was 70.2% in the nivolumab group and 50.0% in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio for disease progression or recurrence, abandoned surgery, or death, 0.58; 97.36% confidence interval [CI], 0.42 to 0.81; P<0.001). A pathological complete response occurred in 25.3% of the patients in the nivolumab group and in 4.7% of those in the chemotherapy group (odds ratio, 6.64; 95% CI, 3.40 to 12.97); a major pathological response occurred in 35.4% and 12.1%, respectively (odds ratio, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.48 to 6.49). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 32.5% of the patients in the nivolumab group and in 25.2% of those in the chemotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative treatment with nivolumab resulted in significantly longer event-free survival than chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. No new safety signals were observed. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; CheckMate 77T ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04025879.).


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Nivolumab , Humans , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Nivolumab/administration & dosage , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/mortality , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Aged , Double-Blind Method , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Progression-Free Survival , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Staging , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Pneumonectomy
6.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 24(5): 613-629, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38738869

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of economic and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, early-stage breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-containing regimens, by focusing on both Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratios (ICERs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases without language or publication year restrictions. Two independent reviewers screened eligible studies, extracted data, and assessed methodology and reporting quality using the Drummond checklist and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022), respectively. Costs were converted to US dollars (US$) for 2023 for cross-study comparison. RESULTS: Twenty-two articles, primarily from high-income countries (HICs), were included, with ICERs ranging from US$13,176/QALY to US$254,510/QALY, falling within country-specific cost-effectiveness thresholds. A notable association was observed between higher QALYs and lower ICERs, indicating a favorable cost-effectiveness and health outcome relationship. EQ-5D was the most utilized instrument for assessing health state utility values, with diverse targeted populations. CONCLUSIONS: Studies reporting higher QALYs tend to have lower ICERs, indicating a positive relationship between cost-effectiveness and health outcomes. However, challenges such as methodological heterogeneity and transparency in utility valuation persist, underscoring the need for standardized guidelines and collaborative efforts among stakeholders. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ID: CRD42021259826.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Breast Neoplasms , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Neoplasm Staging , Quality of Life , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Trastuzumab , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/economics , Trastuzumab/administration & dosage , Trastuzumab/economics , Female , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/economics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Developed Countries
7.
J Med Case Rep ; 18(1): 257, 2024 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778387

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mucosal melanoma, an aggressive type of malignancy different from the cutaneous melanomas commonly seen in the head and neck region, represents < 1% of all malignant melanomas. The pathogenesis of mucosal melanoma is unknown. Targetable mutations commonly seen in cutaneous melanoma, such as in the BRAF and NRAS genes, have a lower incidence in mucosal melanoma. Mucosal melanoma carries a distinct mutational pattern from cutaneous melanoma. Surgery with negative margins is the first-line treatment for mucosal melanoma, and systemic therapy is not well defined. Talimogene laherparepvec, an oncolytic viral immunotherapy, is United States Food and Drug Administration approved for the treatment of advanced malignant cutaneous melanoma, with local therapeutic benefits. Mucosal melanoma was initially excluded from talimogene laherparepvec's initial phase III clinical trial. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a white female patient in her 40s with past medical history of systemic lupus erythematous, scleroderma, and estrogen-receptor-positive invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Following a bilateral mastectomy, the patient was found to have BRAF-negative mucosal melanoma of her hard palate with a soft palate skip lesion. Owing to the presence of a skip mucosal lesion as well as the anticipated defect and need for free-flap reconstructive surgery, nonsurgical management was considered. The patient was referred to medical oncology, where-based on the patient's complicated medical history and the risk of immunotherapy possibly worsening her prior autoimmune diseases-local talimogene laherparepvec injections were chosen as the primary therapy for her mucosal lesions. Though talimogene laherparepvec is approved for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma, there are limited data available on the use of talimogene laherparepvec in mucosal melanomas. CONCLUSION: The patient had a complete local tumor response at both the primary lesion as well as the skip lesion with the local injections. She had no side effects and maintained a high quality of life during treatment.


Subject(s)
Biological Products , Melanoma , Humans , Melanoma/therapy , Female , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Biological Products/administration & dosage , Adult , Herpesvirus 1, Human/genetics , Mouth Mucosa/pathology , Injections, Intralesional , Treatment Outcome , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Oncolytic Virotherapy/methods , Palatal Neoplasms/therapy
9.
Lancet Oncol ; 25(6): 802-810, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821085

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care is a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, leading to climate change and public health harms. Changes are needed to improve the environmental sustainability of health-care practices, but such changes should not sacrifice patient outcomes or financial sustainability. Alternative dosing strategies that reduce the frequency with which specialty drugs are administered, without sacrificing patient outcomes, are an attractive possibility for improving environmental sustainability. We sought to inform environmentally sustainable cancer care by estimating and comparing the environmental and financial effects of alternative, clinically equivalent strategies for pembrolizumab administration. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using a cohort of patients from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in the USA who received one or more pembrolizumab doses between May 1, 2020, and Sept 30, 2022. Using baseline, real-world administration of pembrolizumab, we generated simulated pembrolizumab use data under three near-equivalent counterfactual pembrolizumab administration strategies defined by combinations of weight-based dosing, pharmacy-level vial sharing and dose rounding, and extended-interval dosing (ie, every 6 weeks). For each counterfactual dosing strategy, we estimated greenhouse gas emissions related to pembrolizumab use across the VHA cohort using a deterministic environmental impact model that estimated greenhouse gas emissions due to patient travel, drug manufacture, and medical waste as the primary outcome measure. FINDINGS: We identified 7813 veterans who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab-containing therapy in the VHA during the study period. 59 140 pembrolizumab administrations occurred in the study period, of which 46 255 (78·2%) were dosed at 200 mg every 3 weeks, 12 885 (21·8%) at 400 mg every 6 weeks, and 14 955 (25·3%) were coadministered with infusional chemotherapies. Adoption of weight-based, extended-interval pembrolizumab dosing (4 mg/kg every 6 weeks) and pharmacy-level stewardship strategies (ie, dose rounding and vial sharing) for all pembrolizumab infusions would have resulted in 24·7% fewer administration events than baseline dosing (44 533 events vs 59 140 events) and an estimated 200 metric tons less CO2 emitted per year as a result of pembrolizumab use within the VHA (650 tons vs 850 tons of CO2, a relative reduction of 24%), largely due to reductions in distance travelled by patients to receive treatment. Similar results were observed when weight-based and extended-interval dosing were applied only to pembrolizumab monotherapy and pembrolizumab in combination with oral therapies. INTERPRETATION: Alternative pembrolizumab administration strategies might have environmental advantages over the current dosing and compounding paradigms. Specialty medication dosing can be optimised for health-care spending and environmental sustainability without sacrificing clinical outcomes. FUNDING: None.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , United States , Male , Female , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Public Health , Middle Aged , Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Administration Schedule
10.
Clin Transl Sci ; 17(6): e13825, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38808543

ABSTRACT

Mosunetuzumab (Mosun) is a CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody that redirects T cells to eliminate malignant B cells. The approved step-up dose regimen of 1/2/60/30 mg IV is designed to mitigate cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and maximize efficacy in early cycles. A population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model was developed from 439 patients with relapsed/refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving Mosun IV monotherapy, including fixed dosing (0.05-2.8 mg IV every 3 weeks (q3w)) and Cycle 1 step-up dosing groups (0.4/1/2.8-1/2/60/30 mg IV q3w). Prior to Mosun treatment, ~50% of patients had residual levels of anti-CD20 drugs (e.g., rituximab or obinutuzumab) from prior treatment. CD20 receptor binding dynamics and rituximab/obinutuzumab PK were incorporated into the model to calculate the Mosun CD20 receptor occupancy percentage (RO%) over time. A two-compartment model with time-dependent clearance (CL) best described the data. The typical patient had an initial CL of 1.08 L/day, transitioning to a steady-state CL of 0.584 L/day. Statistically relevant covariates on PK parameters included body weight, albumin, sex, tumor burden, and baseline anti-CD20 drug concentration; no covariate was found to have a clinically relevant impact on exposure at the approved dose. Mosun CD20 RO% was highly variable, attributed to the large variability in residual baseline anti-CD20 drug concentration (median = 10 µg/mL). The 60 mg loading doses increased Mosun CD20 RO% in Cycle 1, providing efficacious exposures in the presence of the competing anti-CD20 drugs. PopPK model simulations, investigating Mosun dose delays, informed treatment resumption protocols to ensure CRS mitigation.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific , Antigens, CD20 , Lymphoma, B-Cell , Humans , Antigens, CD20/immunology , Antigens, CD20/metabolism , Middle Aged , Male , Aged , Lymphoma, B-Cell/drug therapy , Lymphoma, B-Cell/immunology , Female , Adult , Antibodies, Bispecific/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Bispecific/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Bispecific/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Aged, 80 and over , Models, Biological , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Young Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Rituximab/pharmacokinetics , Rituximab/administration & dosage
11.
N Engl J Med ; 390(15): 1359-1371, 2024 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38631003

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant pembrolizumab therapy after surgery for renal-cell carcinoma was approved on the basis of a significant improvement in disease-free survival in the KEYNOTE-564 trial. Whether the results regarding overall survival from the third prespecified interim analysis of the trial would also favor pembrolizumab was uncertain. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) participants with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma who had an increased risk of recurrence after surgery to receive pembrolizumab (at a dose of 200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 17 cycles (approximately 1 year) or until recurrence, the occurrence of unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. A significant improvement in disease-free survival according to investigator assessment (the primary end point) was shown previously. Overall survival was the key secondary end point. Safety was a secondary end point. RESULTS: A total of 496 participants were assigned to receive pembrolizumab and 498 to receive placebo. As of September 15, 2023, the median follow-up was 57.2 months. The disease-free survival benefit was consistent with that in previous analyses (hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.87). A significant improvement in overall survival was observed with pembrolizumab as compared with placebo (hazard ratio for death, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.87; P = 0.005). The estimated overall survival at 48 months was 91.2% in the pembrolizumab group, as compared with 86.0% in the placebo group; the benefit was consistent across key subgroups. Pembrolizumab was associated with a higher incidence of serious adverse events of any cause (20.7%, vs. 11.5% with placebo) and of grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to pembrolizumab or placebo (18.6% vs. 1.2%). No deaths were attributed to pembrolizumab therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant pembrolizumab was associated with a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival, as compared with placebo, among participants with clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma at increased risk for recurrence after surgery. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck; KEYNOTE-564 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03142334.).


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Adjuvants, Immunologic/adverse effects , Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Double-Blind Method , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Disease-Free Survival , Combined Modality Therapy , Survival Analysis
12.
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet ; 49(3): 383-392, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38564097

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: GB221 is a recombinant humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic, safety, and immunogenicity of GB221 in healthy Chinese adults in comparison to trastuzumab (Herceptin®). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group phase I clinical trial, 88 subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive a single intravenous infusion (90-100 min) of GB221 or trastuzumab (6 mg/kg). The primary pharmacokinetic parameters-maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax), area under the serum concentration-time curve from zero to the last quantifiable concentration at time t (AUC0-t), and area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞)-of GB221 and trastuzumab were compared to establish whether the 90% confidence interval (CI) attained the 80-125% bioequivalence standard. Safety and immunogenicity were also evaluated. RESULTS: The GB221 group (n = 43) and the trastuzumab group (n = 44) showed similar pharmacokinetic characteristics. The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ between the two groups were 107.53% (102.25-113.07%), 108.31% (103.57-113.26%), and 108.34% (103.57-113.33%), respectively. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 83.7% (36/43) of the subjects in the GB221 group and 95.5% (42/44) of the subjects in the trastuzumab group. No subjects withdrew from the trial due to TEAEs, and there were no occurrences of serious adverse events. All subjects tested negative for antidrug antibodies (ADA). CONCLUSION: GB221 demonstrated similar pharmacokinetics to trastuzumab and comparable safety and immunogenicity in healthy Chinese adults.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Area Under Curve , Therapeutic Equivalency , Trastuzumab , Humans , Trastuzumab/pharmacokinetics , Trastuzumab/administration & dosage , Trastuzumab/adverse effects , Adult , Male , Double-Blind Method , Female , Young Adult , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Asian People , Infusions, Intravenous , Middle Aged , Healthy Volunteers , Receptor, ErbB-2/immunology , East Asian People
13.
In Vivo ; 38(3): 1338-1350, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38688599

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Over the past several decades, new anti-cancer drugs have been developed for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. The development of drugs has led to changes in improving the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. One of these drugs, bevacizumab, is used for advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer. In this study, we aimed to evaluate survival improvement in patients with platinum-resistant relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer (PR-ROC) after introduction of bevacizumab in real world experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively divided patients with PR-ROC into two groups: bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (BEV-CT group) and chemotherapy alone (CT group). Progression-free survival (PFS), the primary endpoint, between two groups was compared to evaluate whether survival outcomes were improved. In addition, overall survival (OS) was also compared. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were included in the study: 57 and 97 patients in the BEV-CT and CT groups, respectively. OS was significantly longer in the BEV-CT group than in the CT group. The use of bevacizumab was identified as a favorable prognostic factor for OS. In a subgroup analysis confined to second-line chemotherapy, PFS and OS were statistically different between groups. More patients in the CT group suffered hematologic adverse events of grade 3 or above than patients in the BEV-CT group. CONCLUSION: In a real-world clinical setting, introduction of bevacizumab led to improvement of OS in patients with PR-ROC with a tolerable toxicity.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Bevacizumab , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/adverse effects , Female , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Adult , Treatment Outcome , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/mortality , Platinum/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage
14.
Lancet Oncol ; 25(5): 572-587, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561010

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite multimodal therapy, 5-year overall survival for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is about 50%. We assessed the addition of pembrolizumab to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced HNSCC. METHODS: In the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-412 trial, participants with newly diagnosed, high-risk, unresected locally advanced HNSCC from 130 medical centres globally were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab (200 mg) plus chemoradiotherapy or placebo plus chemoradiotherapy. Randomisation was done using an interactive response technology system and was stratified by investigator's choice of radiotherapy regimen, tumour site and p16 status, and disease stage, with participants randomly assigned in blocks of four per stratum. Participants, investigators, and sponsor personnel were masked to treatment assignments. Local pharmacists were aware of assignments to support treatment preparation. Pembrolizumab and placebo were administered intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to 17 doses (one before chemoradiotherapy, two during chemoradiotherapy, 14 as maintenance therapy). Chemoradiotherapy included cisplatin (100 mg/m2) administered intravenously once every 3 weeks for two or three doses and accelerated or standard fractionation radiotherapy (70 Gy delivered in 35 fractions). The primary endpoint was event-free survival analysed in all randomly assigned participants. Safety was analysed in all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03040999, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between April 19, 2017, and May 2, 2019, 804 participants were randomly assigned to the pembrolizumab group (n=402) or the placebo group (n=402). 660 (82%) of 804 participants were male, 144 (18%) were female, and 622 (77%) were White. Median study follow-up was 47·7 months (IQR 42·1-52·3). Median event-free survival was not reached (95% CI 44·7 months-not reached) in the pembrolizumab group and 46·6 months (27·5-not reached) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·83 [95% CI 0·68-1·03]; log-rank p=0·043 [significance threshold, p≤0·024]). 367 (92%) of 398 participants treated in the pembrolizumab group and 352 (88%) of 398 participants treated in the placebo group had grade 3 or worse adverse events. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (108 [27%] of 398 participants in the pembrolizumab group vs 100 [25%] of 398 participants in the placebo group), stomatitis (80 [20%] vs 69 [17%]), anaemia (80 [20%] vs 61 [15%]), dysphagia (76 [19%] vs 62 [16%]), and decreased lymphocyte count (76 [19%] vs 81 [20%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 245 (62%) participants in the pembrolizumab group versus 197 (49%) participants in the placebo group, most commonly pneumonia (43 [11%] vs 25 [6%]), acute kidney injury (33 [8%] vs 30 [8%]), and febrile neutropenia (24 [6%] vs seven [2%]). Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four (1%) participants in the pembrolizumab group (one participant each from aspiration pneumonia, end-stage renal disease, pneumonia, and sclerosing cholangitis) and six (2%) participants in the placebo group (three participants from pharyngeal haemorrhage and one participant each from mouth haemorrhage, post-procedural haemorrhage, and sepsis). INTERPRETATION: Pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy did not significantly improve event-free survival compared with chemoradiotherapy alone in a molecularly unselected, locally advanced HNSCC population. No new safety signals were seen. Locally advanced HNSCC remains a challenging disease that requires better treatment approaches. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Chemoradiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/mortality , Male , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/mortality , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Progression-Free Survival , Adult
15.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther ; 24(5): 253-261, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38594892

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway has changed the landscape in the treatment of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). The ICI pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy now forms a standard of care for the treatment of advanced PD-L1 positive TNBC and as part of neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk early-stage disease. Evidence in this space is rapidly advancing. AREAS COVERED: This review aims to highlight the evolving role of immunotherapy in TNBC management and to discuss current challenges. The studies in this review were searched from PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov. EXPERT OPINION: The KEYNOTE-522 trial demonstrated that the addition of peri-operative pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves patient outcomes in early-stage TNBC. However, critical questions remain including how to select which patients truly gain benefit from the addition of pembrolizumab; the optimal duration of therapy, and the optimal adjuvant therapy depending on pathologic response.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Female , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Staging , Immunotherapy/methods , B7-H1 Antigen/antagonists & inhibitors , Patient Selection , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods
16.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 149: 105616, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561147

ABSTRACT

Pharmacokinetic (PK) models are increasingly submitted to the FDA to support first-in-human (FIH) dose selection of immune-oncology products. To examine whether a simple PK modeling (SPM) using clearance for scaling was acceptable for dose estimation, FIH(SPM) doses were computed and compared to doses that were safely administered to patients. We concluded that the SPM approach is acceptable in FIH dose estimation, but the variables should be carefully selected for CD3 constructs. For CD3 constructs, use of 60 kg BWh, a clearance exponent of 0.75, and a targeted plasma concentration based on relevant and/or sensitive activity assays was an acceptable approach for FIH dose selection; use of 0.85 as the scaling factor is questionable at this time as it resulted in a FIH dose that was too close to the AHD for one product (7%). Immune activating mAbs were not sensitive to changes in the clearance exponent (0.75-0.85) or body weight (60-70 kg). For PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs, using products' in vitro EC50 in the model resulted in suboptimal FIH doses and clinical data of closely related products informed FIH dose selection. PK models submitted by sponsors were diverse in methods, assumptions, and variables, and the resulting FIH doses were not always optimal.


Subject(s)
Models, Biological , Humans , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , B7-H1 Antigen/immunology , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor/immunology , Neoplasms/immunology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , CD3 Complex/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacokinetics , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal/blood
17.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm ; 199: 114295, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636881

ABSTRACT

Postproduction handling of drug products during preparation or clinical use may affect the structure and efficacy of the drug and perhaps remain unnoticed. Since chemical modifications can impact the product's structure, stability, and biological activity, this study investigates the impact of elevated temperature and subtle shift in pH on the drug product post-dilution in saline. The mAb sample diluted in saline for administration was stressed at elevated temperature and slightly acidic pH condition. Extended stability studies were performed and monitored for size and charge heterogeneity. Size heterogeneity shows no significant changes, whereas charge heterogeneity shows an increase in basic variants and a reduction in main species. Further, basic variants were isolated and characterized to identify the type and site of chemical modification. Intact mass analysis and peptide mapping identify that the basic variants were attributed mainly to the isomerization of HC Asp102 into iso-Asp or its succinimide intermediate. Four basic variants were found to exhibit similar structural properties as the main and control samples. However, basic variants showed reduced binding affinity to HER2 receptor, while there was no significant difference in FcRn binding. The results indicate that modification in the HC Asp102, which is present in the CDR, affects antigen binding and thus can influence the potency of the drug product. Hence, with the conventional stability studies required to license the drug product, including in-use or extended stability studies to mimic the postproduction handling would be desirable.


Subject(s)
Drug Stability , Saline Solution , Trastuzumab , Trastuzumab/chemistry , Saline Solution/chemistry , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Humans , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Temperature
18.
Clin Cancer Res ; 30(11): 2433-2443, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38578610

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) may prime adaptive immunity and enhance immunotherapy efficacy. PETAL evaluated safety, preliminary activity of TACE plus pembrolizumab and explored mechanisms of efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were planned to receive up to two rounds of TACE followed by pembrolizumab 200 mg every 21 days commencing 30 days post-TACE until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for up to 1 year. Primary endpoint was safety, with assessment window of 21 days from pembrolizumab initiation. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and evaluation of tumor and host determinants of response. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were included in the safety and efficacy population: 73% had nonviral cirrhosis; median age was 72 years. Child-Pugh class was A in 14 patients. Median tumor size was 4 cm. Ten patients (67%) received pembrolizumab after one TACE; 5 patients after two (33%). Pembrolizumab yielded no synergistic toxicity nor dose-limiting toxicities post-TACE. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 93% of patients, most commonly skin rash (40%), fatigue, and diarrhea (27%). After a median follow-up of 38.5 months, objective response rate 12 weeks post-TACE was 53%. PFS rate at 12 weeks was 93% and median PFS was 8.95 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.30-NE (not estimable)]. Median duration of response was 7.3 months (95% CI: 6.3-8.3). Median overall survival was 33.5 months (95% CI: 11.6-NE). Dynamic changes in peripheral T-cell subsets, circulating tumor DNA, serum metabolites, and in stool bacterial profiles highlight potential mechanisms of action of multimodal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: TACE plus pembrolizumab was tolerable with no evidence of synergistic toxicity, encouraging further clinical development of immunotherapy alongside TACE.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic , Liver Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Male , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Aged , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic/methods , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Treatment Outcome
19.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 23(6): 667-675, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38676380

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains poor and few effective drugs are available. Cisplatin plus 5-FU (CF) has been the standard first-line treatment for advanced ESCC. However, in the KEYNOTE-181 trial, the clinical outcomes were better in patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive advanced ESCC who received pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), than in those who received cytotoxic agents as second-line treatment. Moreover, the KEYNOTE-590 trial demonstrated the superiority of pembrolizumab plus CF over CF alone in terms of overall survival. Based on the results of KEYNOTE-590, pembrolizumab plus CF has become one of the standard treatments for advanced ESCC. However, the safety profile of ICI-containing therapy is different from that of conventional cytotoxic agents. AREAS COVERED: Safety of pembrolizumab-containing therapies in patients with advanced ESCC. EXPERT OPINION: Pembrolizumab-containing therapies are tolerable as first- and second-line treatments in patients with advanced ESCC. Although infrequent, immune-related adverse events may occur in patients on pembrolizumab-containing therapies. These events are potentially fatal and require treatment with steroids or immunosuppressive drugs. Regular physical and laboratory examinations, including measurement of hormone levels, are needed during and after pembrolizumab-containing therapies in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/drug therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prognosis , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Survival Rate , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/adverse effects
20.
Clin Cancer Res ; 30(11): 2424-2432, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38629963

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Accumulating toxicities hinder indefinite chemotherapy for many patients with metastatic/recurrent HER2-negative breast cancer. We conducted a phase II trial of pembrolizumab monotherapy following induction chemotherapy to determine the efficacy of maintenance immunotherapy in patients with metastatic HER2-negative inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and non-IBC triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and a biomarker study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a complete response, partial response, or stable disease (SD) after at least three cycles of chemotherapy for HER2-negative breast cancer received pembrolizumab, regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 expression. Pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered every 3 weeks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or 2 years of pembrolizumab exposure. The endpoints included the 4-month disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and response biomarkers in the blood. RESULTS: Of 43 treated patients, 11 had metastatic IBC and 32 non-IBC TNBC. The 4-month DCR was 58.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 43.4-72.9]. For all patients, the median PFS was 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.0-7.1 months). The toxicity profile was similar to the previous pembrolizumab monotherapy study. Patients with high T-cell clonality at baseline had a longer PFS with pembrolizumab treatment than did those with low T-cell clonality (10.4 vs. 3.6 months, P = 0.04). Patients who achieved SD also demonstrated a significant increase in T-cell clonality during therapy compared with those who did not achieve SD (20% vs. 5.9% mean increase, respectively; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab monotherapy achieved durable treatment responses. Patients with a high baseline T-cell clonality had prolonged disease control with pembrolizumab.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Humans , Female , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Aged , Adult , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Biomarkers, Tumor , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasm Metastasis , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Maintenance Chemotherapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...