Extracorporeal removal techniques in toxicology: part 1.

Supporting clearance of a toxic substance by an extracorporeal removal technique is one of the advanced treatment methods applied in poisoned patient management. General indications stem from toxicokinetics of the poison while individual indications are determined by poisoning severity. The first part of this review deals in detail with particular options of extracorporeal treatment in toxicology and also with its specific application when treating lithium and salicylates poisoning or dabigatran overdose. The aim of this review is to facilitate the clinicians and nephrologists decision making whether to indicate this invasive procedure, to communicate and summarize the existing recommendations and to highlight the most important ways of how to treat poisoning by specific toxic substances.

[Successful treatment of severe dabigatran intoxication with idarucizumab in a patient with acute kidney injury].

In the course of an uncomplicated sigmoidostomy a 63-year-old male who had severe comorbidity developed a critical bleeding due to dabigatran intoxication induced by acute kidney injury. Massive blood transfusions, tranexamic acid, Octaplex and haemodialysis were not effective. Administration of idarucizumab induced immediate clinical and paraclinical improvement. Dabigatran should be carefully administrated in patients who have any degree of renal insufficiency. Idarucizumab may be effective in severe bleeding caused by dabigatran.

Idarucizumab for dabigatran overdose.

CONTEXT: An overdose of oral anticoagulants represents a challenging scenario for emergency physicians. Dabigatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, is increasingly used in place of warfarin. The lack of an antidote is a concern in patients who overdose on dabigatran, even though the drug can be eliminated with hemodialysis. Idarucizumab is an antibody fragment that binds dabigatran with high affinity. It reverses the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran within minutes and is approved for the reversal of dabigatran during emergency situations. CASE DETAILS: We describe the use of idarucizumab in the management of a 68-year-old woman who was taking dabigatran 150 mg twice daily and ingested 125 capsules. Despite gastric lavage and administration of activated charcoal within two hours of drug intake, the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT) remained prolonged. The administration of 5 g of intravenous idarucizumab promptly and completely reversed the anticoagulant activity of dabigatran as assessed by routine and specific coagulation assays (aPTT from to 75 to 26 s, PT from 26 to 11 s and diluted thrombin time from 92 to 27 s). The initially planned emergency hemodialysis was canceled. DISCUSSION: This case highlights the potential use of idarucizumab for the management of massive dabigatran overdoses.

Dabigatran overdose: case report of laboratory coagulation parameters and hemodialysis of an 85-year-old man.

Dabigatran is an oral direct inhibitor indicated for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Unlike warfarin, dabigatran's observed therapeutic window and minimal drug-to-drug interaction suggest that laboratory test and dose adjustments are not necessary; nevertheless, circumstances of excessive anticoagulation, decreased kidney function, and instances of significant bleeding and thrombosis require laboratory assessment. In order to gather experience in the management of global [activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and thrombin time (TT) with extended endpoint] and specific [ecarin chromogenic assay (ECA) and diluted thrombin time (dTT)] laboratory coagulation tests in patients receiving dabigatran with untoward effects, we describe a case in which hemodialysis was used in attempt to remove dabigatran in a patient with excessive anticoagulation, rectal bleeding, and severe anemia. Our experience confirmed that APTT is an unreliable method for the assessment of dabigatran in patients with acute complications because it was often normal in spite of the therapeutic drug plasma levels. Both ECA and dTT showed a linear correlation with dabigatran levels over a broad range, and identified therapeutic and supratherapeutic levels. TT assay, which is highly sensitive to dabigatran, correlated well and linearly not only with low drug levels, but also, because of the introduction of the extended endpoint (400 s), with high concentrations of the drug, and demonstrated to be a simple and reliable alternative to ECA and dTT to assess dabigatran in patients with acute complications.

Enhanced elimination of dabigatran through extracorporeal methods.

Several pharmacokinetic studies have suggested that dabigatran possesses a number of ideal properties for expedited removal via extracorporeal methods. However, this practice has not been prospectively evaluated in patients with life-threatening bleeding or requiring emergency surgery secondary to dabigatran-associated coagulopathy. The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate the published evidence surrounding extracorporeal removal of dabigatran in the setting of emergency surgery or life-threatening bleeding. A query of MEDLINE, Web of Science, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and Google Scholar using the terms dabigatran, dabigatran etexilate, hemodialysis, renal replacement therapy, hemorrhage, and atrial fibrillation was used to retrieve relevant literature. Furthermore, a manual search of the references of the identified literature was performed to capture additional data. Current evidence suggests that extracorporeal removal of dabigatran may play a role in the setting of life-threatening bleeding and emergent surgery. Conflicting evidence exists with regard to the potential for redistribution based on serum dabigatran concentrations. In addition, a number of practicalities must be considered before incorporating this technique in the clinical setting. Extracorporeal removal of dabigatran may be a treatment modality in selected patients who require emergency reversal.

[Serious bleeding as a consequence of accumulation of dabigatran caused by renal failure].

A 77-year-old male was hospitalized due to haematuria and developed septicaemia. He received dabigatran due to chronic atrial fibrillation. Doses were reduced because of renal failure according to guidelines. The patient showed extensive changes in his entire coagulation system. Due to renal failure forced diuresis was not possible, and continuous dialysis was performed. Patients with renal failure should be monitored closely - if there are any sign of bleeding it is important to consider change of anticoagulant therapy as long as an antidote does not exist.

[The effects of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and intermittent haemodialysis (IHD) in the treatment of dabigatran overdose. Case report]. / CRRT e HD standard nel sovradosaggio di Dabigatran.

A 85-year-old man, with CKD (e-GFR 35 mL/min), had been given Dabigatran (a direct thrombin inhibitor) at 110 mg daily dose because of atrial fibrillation. Due to intercurrent diarrhea and dehydration, renal function worsened (e-GFR 11 mL/min) and Dabigatran excretion decreased, thereby inducing drug overload. In this case, Dabigatran must be removed by dialysis, but the most appropriate schedule is still undefined. The effects of both continuous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) and intermittent haemodialysis (IHD) on plasma Dabigatran (Echarin Chromogenic Assay) were reported. Dialysis clearance of Dabigatran was reported as ratio to urea clearance (Dab/Urea(Cl)). Coagulation was assessed by both DOA-aPTTratio and Thrombin Time-ratio (TTratio). Dabigatran was elevated at 597 ng/mL predialysis (bleeding threshold being 30 ng/mL), and decreased to 96 ng/mL (-84%) after 20 hours of CVVHDF (Urea(Cl) = 67 mL/min). Dab/Urea(Cl) was 0.49. Three hours after dialysis, Dabigatran rebounded to 208 ng/mL. On IHD (Urea(Cl)=238 mL/min), predialysis Dabigatran was 52 ng/mL and decreased to 8 ng/mL (-85%) after 3.5 hours of treatment. Dab/Urea(Cl) was 0.47. Fourteen hours later, Dabigatran rebounded at 19 ng/mL. There was a positive correlation between Dabigatran and TTratio (r = 0.92; p<0.0001), whereas DOA-aPTT did not increase above 2.5 times the reference values, even in face of the highest values of Dabigatran. Therefore, TTratio is more reliable than DOA-aPTT in detecting Dabigatran overdose. Post-dialysis rebound of Dabigatran occurred also with CVVHDF, thereby suggesting that accurate monitoring of both Dabigatran levels and bleeding risk are mandatory, also after long-lasting dialysis sessions.

Use of continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration therapy in dabigatran overdose.

CONTEXT: Dabigatran etexilate is one of the newer oral anticoagulants and a direct thrombin inhibitor. Concerns regarding dabigatran's use include its lack of validated laboratory markers for measuring its anticoagulation effect, the impact of renal impairment on its clearance, and the lack of effective strategies for reversal of anticoagulation. Hemodialysis has been utilized to reverse the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran in therapeutic doses. However, hemodialysis may not be feasible in hemodynamically unstable patients. There is little data on clearance rates of dabigatran by continuous renal replacement therapies. CASE DETAILS: A 66-year-old male presented following a poly-pharmacy overdose of 9 g of dabigatran in combination with metoprolol, amlodipine, olmesartan, and moxonidine. Eleven hours post overdose extracorporeal elimination was implemented as the patient developed worsening coagulopathy with an elevated international normalized ratio of 11 IU, an activated partial thromboplastin time of 115 s, and had renal impairment with a creatinine of 158 µmol/L. As the patient was hemodynamically unstable, continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration was preferred over intermittent hemodialysis. Renal replacement therapy was performed for 32 h in total and the patient made a full recovery with no hemorrhagic complications or end organ injury. This patient developed a peak serum dabigatran level of 1560 ng/ml, 11 h postoverdose. Clearance of dabigatran via continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration was calculated, using both the recovery and A-V pair methods, with a mean clearance of 58.1 and 31.9 ml/h, respectively, and a calculated mean extraction ratio of 0.2. CONCLUSION: There are few case reports and little experience when dabigatran is taken in overdose. This is a case report of a large dabigatran overdose presenting data on the extraction ratio and clearance of dabigatran using continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration.

Positive outcome after intentional overdose of dabigatran.

INTRODUCTION: Dabigatran (Pradaxa™), an orally active direct thrombin inhibitor, was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation in October 2010. Life-threatening consequences from dabigatran therapy include hemorrhage and bleeding complications, but they typically occur after renal impairment. We describe the first case report of intentional, acute overdose with dabigatran. CASE REPORT: A 57-year-old woman with a medical history of depression and atrial fibrillation presented to the emergency department after ingesting 11.25 g of dabigatran in a suicide attempt. Despite an ecchymosis indicative of prior trauma, there was no evidence of acute bleeding. After receiving gastric lavage and activated charcoal therapy in the emergency department, she was admitted to the ICU. On presentation, dabigatran blood levels measured 970 ng/mL and thrombin clot times measured above the testable limits (>120 s) until 52 h post-arrival. The remainder of her clinical course was uncomplicated, and the patient was transferred to an inpatient psychiatric unit for depression follow-up. DISCUSSION: This case shows the clinical course of a patient with an acute, massive dabigatran overdose with no significant clinical consequences. Currently, there is no ideal method to monitor anticoagulation levels; there is no pharmacologic reversal method, and hemodialysis is an undesirable treatment option.