Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Sex Transm Infect ; 95(1): 28-35, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30674687

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many economic evaluations of human papillomavirus vaccination should ideally consider multiple disease outcomes, including anogenital warts, respiratory papillomatosis and non-cervical cancers (eg, anal, oropharyngeal, penile, vulvar and vaginal cancers). However, published economic evaluations largely relied on estimates from single studies or informal rapid literature reviews. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of articles up to June 2016 to identify costs and utility estimates admissible for an economic evaluation from a single-payer healthcare provider's perspective. Meta-analyses were performed for studies that used same utility elicitation tools for similar diseases. Costs were adjusted to 2016/2017 US$. RESULTS: Sixty-one papers (35 costs; 24 utilities; 2 costs and utilities) were selected from 10 742 initial records. Cost per case ranges were US$124-US$883 (anogenital warts), US$6912-US$52 579 (head and neck cancers), US$12 936-US$51 571 (anal cancer), US$17 524-34 258 (vaginal cancer), US$14 686-US$28 502 (vulvar cancer) and US$9975-US$27 629 (penile cancer). The total cost for 14 adult patients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis was US$137 601 (one paper).Utility per warts episode ranged from 0.651 to 1 (12 papers, various utility elicitation methods), with pooled mean EQ-5D and EQ-VAS of 0.86 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.87) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.75), respectively. Fifteen papers reported utilities in head and neck cancers with range 0.29 (95% CI 0.0 to 0.76) to 0.94 (95% CI 0.3 to 1.0). Mean utility reported ranged from 0.5 (95% CI 0.4 to 0.61) to 0.65 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.75) (anal cancer), 0.59 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.64) (vaginal cancer), 0.65 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.70) (vulvar cancer) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.84) (penile cancer). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in values reported from each paper reflect variations in cancer site, disease stages, study population, treatment modality/setting and utility elicitation methods used. As patient management changes over time, corresponding effects on both costs and utility need to be considered to ensure health economic assumptions are up-to-date and closely reflect the case mix of patients.


Subject(s)
Anus Neoplasms/economics , Condylomata Acuminata/economics , Head and Neck Neoplasms/economics , Papillomavirus Infections/economics , Papillomavirus Vaccines/economics , Penile Neoplasms/economics , Respiratory Tract Infections/economics , Vaginal Neoplasms/economics , Vulvar Neoplasms/economics , Anus Diseases/economics , Anus Diseases/prevention & control , Anus Neoplasms/prevention & control , Condylomata Acuminata/prevention & control , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Genital Diseases, Female/economics , Genital Diseases, Female/prevention & control , Genital Diseases, Male/economics , Genital Diseases, Male/prevention & control , Head and Neck Neoplasms/prevention & control , Health Care Costs , Humans , Male , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Penile Neoplasms/prevention & control , Quality of Life , Respiratory Tract Infections/prevention & control , United States , Vaginal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Vulvar Neoplasms/prevention & control
2.
Salud pública Méx ; 60(6): 624-632, Nov.-Dec. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1020926

ABSTRACT

Abstract: Objective: To estimate the burden of genital warts (GW) in Mexico. Materials and methods: We estimated the annual incidence of GW based on data reported by specialist physicians. We also assessed GW treatment practices, the average cost of treatment, and the psychosocial burden of GW among patients. Results: The annual incidence of GW in Mexico was estimated to be 547 200 cases. Treatment procedures vary by specialist and patient gender. The estimated annual cost was $195 million USD. The psychosocial impact of GW was slightly greater in males than females. Conclusions: This is the first evaluation of the burden of GW in Mexico. Our data suggest that GW are common, with significant health-related costs and psychosocial impact.


Resumen: Objetivo: Estimar la carga por verrugas genitales (VG) en México. Material y métodos: Estimamos la incidencia anual de VG, con base en información proporcionada por médicos especialistas y el manejo de las VG, así como el costo promedio del tratamiento y la carga psicosocial de las VG. Resultados: La incidencia anual de VG en México fue de 547 200 casos. Los tratamientos variaron según la especialidad y el sexo del paciente. El costo anual por VG fue de $195 millones de dólares estadounidenses. El impacto psicosocial de las VG es ligeramente mayor en hombres que en mujeres. Conclusiones: Esta es la primera evaluación de la carga de VG en México. Los datos sugieren que las VG son frecuentes, tienen costos relacionados con salud e impactos psicosociales significativos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Anus Diseases/epidemiology , Condylomata Acuminata/epidemiology , Genital Diseases, Female/epidemiology , Genital Diseases, Male/epidemiology , Anus Diseases/economics , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Quality of Life , Incidence , Prevalence , Health Surveys , Health Care Costs , Cost of Illness , Combined Modality Therapy , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Genital Diseases, Female/economics , Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Mexico/epidemiology
3.
Salud Publica Mex ; 60(6): 624-632, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30699267

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the burden of genital warts (GW)in Mexico. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We estimated the annual incidence of GW based on data reported by specialist physicians. We also assessed GW treatment practices, the average cost of treatment, and the psychosocial burden of GW among patients. RESULTS: The annual incidence of GW in Mexico was estimated to be 547 200 cases. Treatment procedures vary by specialist and patient gender. The estimated annual cost was $195 million USD. The psychosocial impact of GW was slightly greater in males than females. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first evaluation of the burden of GW in Mexico. Our data suggest that GW are common, with significant health-related costs and psychosocial impact.


OBJETIVO: Estimar la carga por verrugas genitales (VG) en México. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estimamos la incidencia anual de VG, con base en información proporcionada por médicos especialistas y el manejo de las VG, así como el costo promedio del tratamiento y la carga psicosocial de las VG. RESULTADOS: La incidencia anual de VG en México fue de 547 200 casos. Los tratamientos variaron según la especialidad y el sexo del paciente. El costo anual por VG fue de $195 millones de dólares estadounidenses. El impacto psicosocial de las VG es ligeramente mayor en hombres que en mujeres. CONCLUSIONES: Esta es la primera evaluación de la carga de VG en México. Los datos sugieren que las VG son frecuentes, tienen costos relacionados con salud e impactos psicosociales significativos.


Subject(s)
Anus Diseases/epidemiology , Condylomata Acuminata/epidemiology , Genital Diseases, Female/epidemiology , Genital Diseases, Male/epidemiology , Adult , Anus Diseases/economics , Anus Diseases/psychology , Anus Diseases/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Condylomata Acuminata/economics , Condylomata Acuminata/psychology , Condylomata Acuminata/therapy , Cost of Illness , Female , Genital Diseases, Female/economics , Genital Diseases, Female/psychology , Genital Diseases, Female/therapy , Genital Diseases, Male/economics , Genital Diseases, Male/psychology , Genital Diseases, Male/therapy , Health Care Costs , Health Surveys , Humans , Incidence , Male , Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Mexico/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Papillomavirus Vaccines , Prevalence , Quality of Life
4.
ANZ J Surg ; 86(10): 782-784, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27226422

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The detection of gut organisms in perianal abscesses has been postulated to suggest an underlying communication with the anal canal. However, recent studies appear to contradict this observation. The aim of this study is to determine the value of bacteriological studies in perianal abscesses. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients who have had a surgical drainage of their perianal abscesses with concomitant microbiological examination from January 2010 to December 2012 was performed. Patients with known underlying anal fistula, Crohn's disease or previous perianal operations were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients, median age of 42.0 years (range 8-87) comprising of 78.7% males formed the study group. Gut organisms were cultured in 143 (87.2%) samples while 12 (7.3%) demonstrated skin organisms and nine did not yield any bacterial growth (5.5%). Twenty-nine (17.7%) patients developed anal fistula and 34 (20.7%) patients had a recurrence of the perianal abscess. The median follow-up period was 1450 (14-2391) days. There was no significant association between the presence of gut organism and development of fistulas (odds ratio = 0.48; 95% confidence interval = 0.17-1.37) or recurrence of perianal abscess (odds ratio = 1.66; 95% confidence interval = 0.46-6.01). CONCLUSION: Bacteriological culture in perianal abscess is not useful for predicting the development of anal fistula or abscess recurrence. Hence, there is no need to perform this investigation on a routine basis.


Subject(s)
Abscess/microbiology , Anus Diseases/microbiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Abscess/complications , Abscess/economics , Abscess/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anus Diseases/complications , Anus Diseases/economics , Anus Diseases/surgery , Bacterial Infections/complications , Bacterial Infections/economics , Bacterial Infections/surgery , Child , Drainage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rectal Fistula/economics , Rectal Fistula/etiology , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Singapore , Young Adult
5.
Br J Surg ; 103(8): 1063-8, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27061287

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Management of perianal abscesses has remained largely unchanged for over 50 years. The evidence for postoperative wound packing is limited and may expose patients to painful procedures with no clinical benefit and at considerable increased cost. METHODS: Patients were recruited in 15 UK centres between December 2013 and October 2014. Outcome measures included number of dressing (pack) changes, healing, recurrence, return to work/normal function, postoperative fistula in ano and health utility scores (EQ-5D™). Pain was measured before, during and after dressing change on a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Some 141 patients were recruited (median age 39 (range 18-86) years). The mean number of dressing changes in the first 3 weeks was 13 (range 0-21), equating to an annual cost to the National Health Service of €6 453 360 in England alone per annum. Some 43·8 per cent of wounds were healed by 8 weeks after surgery and 86 per cent of patients had returned to normal function. Some 7·6 per cent of abscesses had recurred and 26·7 per cent of patients developed a fistula in ano by 6 months following surgery. Patients reported a twofold to threefold increase in pain scores during and after dressing changes. CONCLUSION: Recurrent abscess is rare and fistula occurs in one-quarter of the patients. Packing is painful and costly.


Subject(s)
Abscess/therapy , Anus Diseases/therapy , Drainage , Abscess/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anus Diseases/economics , Bandages/economics , Bandages/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Nursing/economics , Female , Fissure in Ano/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Recurrence , United Kingdom , Visual Analog Scale , Wound Healing , Young Adult
6.
Yonsei Med J ; 56(6): 1721-30, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26446659

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Aim of this study is to investigate the characteristics and performance of colorectal-anal specialty vs. general hospitals for South Korean inpatients with colorectal-anal diseases, and assesses the short-term designation effect of the government's specialty hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nationwide all colorectal-anal disease inpatient claims (n=292158) for 2010-2012 were used to investigate length of stay and inpatient charges for surgical and medical procedures in specialty vs. general hospitals. The patients' claim data were matched to hospital data, and multi-level linear mixed models to account for clustering of patients within hospitals were performed. RESULTS: Inpatient charges at colorectal-anal specialty hospitals were 27% greater per case and 92% greater per day than those at small general hospitals, but the average length of stay was 49% shorter. Colorectal-anal specialty hospitals had shorter length of stay and a higher inpatient charges per day for both surgical and medical procedures, but per case charges were not significantly different. A "specialty" designation effect also found that the colorectal-anal specialty hospitals may have consciously attempted to reduce their length of stay and inpatient charges. Both hospital and patient level factors had significant roles in determining length of stay and inpatient charges. CONCLUSION: Colorectal-anal specialty hospitals have shorter length of stay and higher inpatient charges per day than small general hospitals. A "specialty" designation by government influence performance and healthcare spending of hospitals as well. In order to maintain prosperous specialty hospital system, investigation into additional factors that affect performance, such as quality of care and patient satisfaction should be carried out.


Subject(s)
Anus Diseases/therapy , Colonic Diseases/therapy , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Rectal Diseases/therapy , Adult , Aged , Anus Diseases/economics , Colonic Diseases/economics , Efficiency, Organizational , Female , Hospitals, General/organization & administration , Hospitals, Special/organization & administration , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/economics , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Rectal Diseases/economics , Republic of Korea
7.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 30(9): 1275-9, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25994782

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Perianal disease is a potentially significant source of morbidity for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We sought to identify the impact of perianal disease on IBD outcomes in children, adolescents, and young adults. METHODS: We studied 12,465 inpatient admissions for patients ≤20 years old with IBD in 2009 using the Kids' Inpatient Database (KID). Patients were stratified by their principal diagnosis of ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD). Perianal disease (perianal abscess, anal fissure, or anal fistula), complex fistulas (rectourethral, rectovaginal, or enterovesical), and growth failure were defined by ICD-9 codes. Logistic regression was performed adjusting for CD or UC, gender, age, need for surgical intervention, fistulas, or growth failure. RESULTS: Of the 511 (4.1%) patients with perianal disease, 480 had CD (94%, p < 0.001). Girls were less likely to suffer perianal disease (OR = 0.63, CI 0.52-0.76, p < 0.001). Those with perianal disease were more likely to suffer complex fistulas (OR = 3.5, CI 1.98-6.20, p < 0.001) but less likely to suffer enteroenteral fistulas (OR = 0.30, CI 0.15-0.63, p = 0.001) than those without perianal disease. Perianal disease did not increase the incidence of growth failure (p = 0.997) but doubled the likelihood of an operation of any type during admission (p < 0.001). Additionally, patients with perianal disease spent on average 1.29 more days in the hospital (7.45 vs. 6.16 days, p < 0.001) and accrued $5838 extra in hospital charges (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Perianal disease in younger patients is associated with a longer length of stay, higher hospital charges, and increased rates of both perineal and abdominal operative procedures. These data support the notion that, similar to adults, the presence of perianal disease in pediatric Crohn's patients is associated with a more severe course.


Subject(s)
Abscess/etiology , Anus Diseases/etiology , Colitis, Ulcerative/complications , Crohn Disease/complications , Cutaneous Fistula/etiology , Rectal Fistula/etiology , Abscess/economics , Abscess/surgery , Adolescent , Anus Diseases/economics , Anus Diseases/surgery , Child , Colitis, Ulcerative/surgery , Crohn Disease/surgery , Cutaneous Fistula/economics , Cutaneous Fistula/surgery , Female , Fissure in Ano/economics , Fissure in Ano/etiology , Fissure in Ano/surgery , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Rectal Fistula/economics , Rectal Fistula/surgery , Sex Factors , Young Adult
8.
Yonsei Medical Journal ; : 1721-1730, 2015.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-70397

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Aim of this study is to investigate the characteristics and performance of colorectal-anal specialty vs. general hospitals for South Korean inpatients with colorectal-anal diseases, and assesses the short-term designation effect of the government's specialty hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nationwide all colorectal-anal disease inpatient claims (n=292158) for 2010-2012 were used to investigate length of stay and inpatient charges for surgical and medical procedures in specialty vs. general hospitals. The patients' claim data were matched to hospital data, and multi-level linear mixed models to account for clustering of patients within hospitals were performed. RESULTS: Inpatient charges at colorectal-anal specialty hospitals were 27% greater per case and 92% greater per day than those at small general hospitals, but the average length of stay was 49% shorter. Colorectal-anal specialty hospitals had shorter length of stay and a higher inpatient charges per day for both surgical and medical procedures, but per case charges were not significantly different. A "specialty" designation effect also found that the colorectal-anal specialty hospitals may have consciously attempted to reduce their length of stay and inpatient charges. Both hospital and patient level factors had significant roles in determining length of stay and inpatient charges. CONCLUSION: Colorectal-anal specialty hospitals have shorter length of stay and higher inpatient charges per day than small general hospitals. A "specialty" designation by government influence performance and healthcare spending of hospitals as well. In order to maintain prosperous specialty hospital system, investigation into additional factors that affect performance, such as quality of care and patient satisfaction should be carried out.


Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Anus Diseases/economics , Colonic Diseases/economics , Efficiency, Organizational , Hospital Charges/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, General/organization & administration , Hospitals, Special/organization & administration , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/economics , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/economics , Rectal Diseases/economics , Republic of Korea
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...