Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 83(1): 1-7, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32243591

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although occupational contact urticaria (CU) and protein contact dermatitis (PCD) are considered frequent among workers with exposure to proteinaceous materials, data on occupations at risk and the main causes of these occupational skin diseases are relatively limited. OBJECTIVES: To report the causative agents and risk occupations for CU and PCD in the Finnish Register of Occupational Diseases (FROD). METHODS: We retrieved from the FROD all recognized cases of CU/PCD in the years 2005-2016. RESULTS: With 570 cases, CU and PCD constituted 11% of all recognized cases of occupational skin diseases in the study period. Occupations with the highest incidence of CU/PCD included bakers, chefs and cooks, farmers and farm workers, veterinarians, gardeners, and hairdressers. The most common causative agents were cow dander and flour and grain, followed by natural rubber latex (NRL) and other food. In food-related occupations, wheat and other flours were by far the most common cause of CU/PCD, with 76 cases, whereas fish and other animal-derived food caused 33 and other plant-derived food caused 23 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from the Finnish peculiarity of cow dander allergy, a striking finding was a large share of CU/PCD caused by flours in food handlers as compared to other food.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Plant Proteins/adverse effects , Urticaria/epidemiology , Agriculture , Animal Feed/adverse effects , Animals , Apium/adverse effects , Barbering , Cattle , Dander/adverse effects , Daucus carota/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Ficus/adverse effects , Finland , Fish Flour/adverse effects , Fishes , Flour/adverse effects , Food Industry , Humans , Latex Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Pastinaca/adverse effects , Plant Roots/adverse effects , Registries , Solanum tuberosum/adverse effects , Urticaria/etiology , Veterinarians
2.
Nutrients ; 10(10)2018 Oct 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30332840

ABSTRACT

In practice, it remains unclear what the best dietary approach is in subjects with pollen-related food allergy (PRFA). Our objective was to evaluate the effect of (1) dietary avoidance advice, (2) oral immunotherapy (OIT), (3) (heat) processing, and (4) consumption of hypoallergenic cultivars on frequency, severity, and eliciting dose of pollen-related food allergic reactions. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. All studies performing an in vivo investigation of one of the four interventions in adults with PRFA were included. Each study was assessed for quality and validity. Available data on frequency, severity, and eliciting dose of allergic reactions were extracted. Ten studies matched the eligibility criteria. No studies were retrieved on dietary avoidance advice. Two studies (N = 92) on apple OIT reported that tolerance was induced in 63% and 81% of subjects. Four studies (total N = 116) focused on heat processing. Heating was found to completely eradicate symptoms in 15⁻71% of hazelnut allergic and 46% of celery allergic individuals. Four studies (N = 60) comparing low to high allergenic apple cultivars revealed that Santana (and possibly Elise) apples seemed to cause milder reactions than Golden Delicious. In the awareness that overall level of evidence was low, we conclude that OIT, heat processing, and hypoallergenic cultivars may diminish or completely prevent allergic reactions in some but not all subjects with PRFA.


Subject(s)
Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Cooking/methods , Food Hypersensitivity/therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/therapy , Adult , Apium/adverse effects , Corylus/adverse effects , Daucus carota/adverse effects , Hot Temperature , Humans , Malus/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
4.
Postgrad Med ; 128(7): 682-3, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27467225

ABSTRACT

Celery root belongs to a group of plants classified as the umbelliferous family, which contains phytoestrogens. Phytoestrogens are structurally similar to estrogen as they share a pair of hydroxyl groups and phenolic ring, which enables them to bind to estrogen receptors directly, making them a herbal remedy for low estrogen states such as menopause. We present a case of a female patient with depression who was stabilized on venlafaxine and St John's Wort, and who developed a manic episode due to elevated serum venlafaxine levels after she started taking celery extracts for menopausal related issues. We proffer a hypothesis for this unusual occurrence.


Subject(s)
Apium/adverse effects , Bipolar Disorder , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Hypericum , Phytotherapy , Venlafaxine Hydrochloride/administration & dosage , Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation/administration & dosage , Bipolar Disorder/chemically induced , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Female , Herb-Drug Interactions , Humans , Menopause/drug effects , Middle Aged , Phytotherapy/adverse effects , Phytotherapy/methods , Plant Preparations/administration & dosage , Plant Preparations/adverse effects , Plant Roots/adverse effects , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment Outcome , Withholding Treatment
5.
Contact Dermatitis ; 70(2): 98-103, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24102077

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to root vegetables of the Umbelliferae plant family (Apiaceae) is well known. Delayed-type hypersensitivity is rarely reported. OBJECTIVE: To report the first case of systemic contact dermatitis caused by root vegetables and some chemical implications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prick and patch testing were performed with fresh vegetables and selected allergens, and this was followed by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (MS)/MS analysis of the falcarinol syringe. RESULTS: The patient was contact-sensitive to celeriac, parsnip, and carrot, but tested negative to falcarinol. Subsequent analysis showed that the syringe contained falcarinol. CONCLUSION: The non-occupational sensitization resulting from both direct and systemic contact with Apiaceae root vegetables was apparently not caused by falcarinol.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , Vegetables/adverse effects , Adult , Apium/adverse effects , Conjunctivitis/etiology , Daucus carota/adverse effects , Diynes/adverse effects , Fatty Alcohols/adverse effects , Female , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Hand Dermatoses/etiology , Humans , Pastinaca/adverse effects , Patch Tests , Rhinitis/etiology , Stomatitis/etiology
6.
Allergy ; 67(1): 107-13, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22092081

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) is the gold standard for diagnosing food allergy. Standardized materials and protocols are essential for comparing DBPCFC results for multicentre studies such as EuroPrevall. This required the development and piloting of a standardized vehicle and low-dose protocol for confirming food allergy and determination of minimum eliciting doses (MEDs). METHODS: A low-dose DBPCFC protocol was developed, with eight titrated protein doses from 3 µg to 1 g. This was delivered using a simple, microbiologically stable food base incorporating allergenic food ingredients manufactured at three sites and centrally distributed to clinical centres. Allergen blinding was assessed by a professional sensory testing panel using a triangle test. Homogeneity and allergen content were confirmed by ELISA and clinical efficacy was assessed in a pilot study, using celeriac and hazelnut as exemplars. RESULTS: Celeriac and hazelnut ingredients were sufficiently blinded in the dessert. The dessert meals were successfully piloted with hazelnut in allergy clinics in Spain, the Netherlands and Italy and with celeriac and hazelnut in Zurich. The challenges elicited a range of subjective and objective reactions ranging in severity from mild itching of the oral mucosa to bronchospasm. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized challenge vehicle proven to sufficiently blind processed, powdered hazelnut and celeriac ingredients and that can be reproducibly manufactured has been developed. This pilot study shows that the vehicle is promising for the confirmation of food allergy and determination of MEDs in adults and children with body weight >28.8 kg (approximately 7-11 years old).


Subject(s)
Allergens/administration & dosage , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Immunologic Tests/standards , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards , Allergens/immunology , Apium/adverse effects , Apium/immunology , Corylus/adverse effects , Corylus/immunology , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Pilot Projects
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18714542

ABSTRACT

We present a case of anaphylactic shock induced by exercise following celery ingestion. The possible mechanism of food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (FDEIA) and the laboratory tests for its diagnosis are discussed. We evaluated spontaneous, celery-allergen-induced, and anti-FcepsilonRI-antibody-induced histamine release from basophils obtained from the patient, 2 celery-allergic controls, and 3 healthy controls. Buffers of increasing osmolarity were used to mimic conditions of vigorous physical exercise. Only the patient's basophils showed an increase in spontaneous, anti-FcepsilonRI antibody-induced and allergen-induced histamine release under physiological conditions and with slightly increased medium osmolarity. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the possible role of increased histamine releasability in the pathogenic mechanism of FDEIA. We suggest that FDEIA results from increased histamine releasability triggered by physical effort after exposure to a sensitizing food allergen.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/immunology , Basophils/immunology , Exercise , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Histamine Release , Adult , Anaphylaxis/metabolism , Apium/adverse effects , Basophils/metabolism , Female , Food Hypersensitivity/metabolism , Humans , Osmolar Concentration
11.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 33(5): 288-90, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16287550

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few previous reports of carrot-induced asthma have been confirmed by objective tests. Hypersensitivity to carrot is frequently associated with allergy to Apiaceae spices and sensitization to birch and mugwort pollens. CLINICAL CASE: A 40-year-old cook woman was seen with sneezing, rhinorrhea, contact urticaria and wheezing within few minutes of handling or cutting raw carrots. She needed to leave out of the kitchen while the other cooks cut raw carrots. METHODS AND RESULTS: Skin tests were positive to carrot, celery, aniseed and fennel. Rubbing test with fresh carrot was positive. Specific IgE to carrot was 4.44 kU/L. Determinations of specific IgE to mugwort, grass and birch pollens were negative. Inhalative provocation test, performed as a handling test, was positive. The IgE-immunoblotting showed two bands in carrot extract: a band with apparent molecular weight of 30 kd and other band of 18 kd. This band of 18 kd was Dau c 1. The band of 30 kd could correspond a phenylcoumaran benzylic ether reductase. Dau c 1 did not appear to be the unique allergen in this case. Additional allergens may induce the sensitization. Primary sensitization due to airborne allergens of foods and the lack of pollen allergy in this patient are notorious events.


Subject(s)
Asthma/etiology , Daucus carota/adverse effects , Food Handling , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Adult , Apium/adverse effects , Cough/etiology , Female , Humans , Pruritus/etiology , Skin Tests , Urticaria/etiology
12.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 33(5): 288-290, sept. 2005. ilus
Article in En | IBECS | ID: ibc-042141

ABSTRACT

Background: Few previous reports of carrot-induced asthma have been confirmed by objective tests. Hypersensitivity to carrot is frequently associated with allergy to Apiaceae spices and sensitization to birch and mugwort pollens. Clinical case: A 40-year-old cook woman was seen with sneezing, rhinorrhea, contact urticaria and wheezing within few minutes of handling or cutting raw carrots. She needed to leave out of the kitchen while the other cooks cut raw carrots. Methods and results: Skin tests were positive to carrot, celery, aniseed and fennel. Rubbing test with fresh carrot was positive. Specific IgE to carrot was 4.44 kU/L. Determinations of specific IgE to mugwort, grass and birch pollens were negative. Inhalative provocation test, performed as a handling test, was positive. The IgE-immunoblotting showed two bands in carrot extract: a band with apparent molecular weight of 30 kd and other band of 18 kd. This band of 18 kd was Dau c 1. The band of 30 kd could correspond a phenylcoumaran benzylic ether reductase. Dau c 1 did not appear to be the unique allergen in this case. Additional allergens may induce the sensitization. Primary sensitization due to airborne allergens of foods and the lack of pollen allergy in this patient are notorious events


No disponible


Subject(s)
Female , Adult , Humans , Asthma/etiology , Daucus carota/adverse effects , Food Handling , Pruritus/etiology , Urticaria/etiology , Apium/adverse effects , Cough/etiology , Skin Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...