Complications of antibiotic cement spacers used for elbow infections.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic cement spacers have been widely used in the treatment of joint infections. There are no commercially available antibiotic spacers for the elbow. Instead, they are typically fashioned by the surgeon at the time of surgery using cement alone or a combination of cement with sutures, Steinmann pins, external fixator components, or elbow arthroplasty components. There is no consensus regarding the ideal elbow antibiotic spacer and no previous studies have examined the complications associated with these handmade implants in relation to their unique structural design. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 55 patients who had 78 static antibiotic cement spacers implanted between January 1998 and February 2021 as part of a 2-stage treatment plan for infection of an elbow arthroplasty, other elbow surgery, or primary elbow infection. Several antibiotic spacer structures were used during the study period. For analysis purposes, the spacers were classified into linked and unlinked spacers based on whether there was a linking mechanism between the humerus and the ulna. Complications related to these spacers that occurred either during the implantation, between implantation and removal, or during removal were recorded and analyzed from chart review and follow-up x rays. Reoperations due to spacer-related complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Among the 55 patients (78 spacers), there were 23 complications, including 17 minor and 6 major complications. The most common complication of unlinked spacers (intramedullary [IM] dowels, beads and cap spacer) was spacer displacement. Other complications included IM dowel fracture and difficulty locating beads during spacer removal. The major complications of linked cement spacers included two periprosthetic humerus fractures after internal external fixator cement spacers and re-operation due to breakage and displacement of one bushing cement spacer. The major complications of unlinked cement spacers included two reoperations due to IM dowel displacement and one reoperation due to displacement of beads. Among patients who had removal of all components and those with native joints, there was no statistically significant difference between internal external fixator cement spacers and unlinked cement spacers in minor complication rates (30% vs. 16%, P = .16), major complication rates (7% vs. 8%, P = .85) and reoperation rates (0% vs. 8%, P = .12). CONCLUSIONS: Static handmade antibiotic elbow spacers have unique complications related to their structural designs. The most common complication of linked and nonlinked cement spacers were failure of the linking mechanism and displacement, respectively. Surgeons should keep in mind the possible complications of different structures of cement spacers when choosing 1 antibiotic spacer structure over another.

High failure rate of 2-stage revision for the infected total elbow arthroplasty: a single institution's experience.

BACKGROUND: Despite 2-stage revision being a common treatment for elbow prosthetic joint infection (PJI), failure rates are high. The purpose of this study was to report on a single institution's experience with 2-stage revisions for elbow PJI and determine risk factors for failed eradication of infection. The secondary purpose was to determine risk factors for needing allograft bone at the second stage of revision in the setting of compromised bone stock. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all 2-stage revision total elbow arthroplasties (TEAs) performed for infection at a single institution between 2006 and 2020. Data collected included demographics and treatment course prior to, during, and after 2-stage revision. Radiographs obtained after explantation and operative reports were reviewed to evaluate for partial component retention and incomplete cement removal. The primary outcome was failed eradication of infection, defined as the need for repeat surgery to treat infection after the second-stage revision. The secondary outcome was the use of allograft for compromised bone stock during the second-stage revision. Risk factors for both outcomes were determined. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included. Seven patients (37%) had either the humeral or ulnar component retained during the first stage, and 10 (53%) had incomplete removal of cement in either the humerus or ulna. Nine patients (47%) had allograft strut used during reimplantation and reconstruction. Nine patients (47%) failed to eradicate the infection after 2-stage revision. Demographic data were similar between the repeat-infection and nonrepeat-infection groups. Six patients (60%) with retained cement failed compared with 3 patients (33%) with full cement removal (P = .370). Two patients (29%) with a retained component failed compared to 7 patients (58%) with full component removal (P = .350). Allograft was used less frequently when a well-fixed component or cement was retained, with no patients with a retained component needing allograft compared to 9 with complete component removal (P = .003). Three patients (30%) with retained cement needed allograft, compared with 6 patients (67%) who had complete cement removal (P = .179). CONCLUSION: Nearly half of the patients failed to eradicate infection after 2-stage revision. The data did not demonstrate a clear association between retained cement or implants and risk of recurrent infection. Allograft was used less frequently when a component and cement were retained, possibly serving as a proxy for decreased bone loss during the first stage of revision. Therefore, the unclear benefit of removing well-fixed components and cement need to be carefully considered as it likely leads to compromised bone stock that complicates the second stage of revision.

Failure of the linkage mechanism in a semi-constrained total elbow arthroplasty is a rare and unpredictable event: a review of seven cases.

PURPOSE: Linked component of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) consisted of bushing and locking pins. Failure of linked components is a rare complication of TEA. This study aims to investigate the mechanism and consequence of failure of the linkage mechanism in TEA surgeries. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2021, five patients received revision operation due to linked component failure. Besides, two patients underwent primary operation at another institute were also analyzed due to failure of the linkage mechanism. RESULTS: All seven patients underwent primary TEA and mean age for primary TEA was 48 (range, 27-62). Two patients had TEA for post-traumatic arthritis, three patients for rheumatoid arthritis, and two patients for comminuted distal humerus fracture. The average time between primary TEA and revision TEA for linked component failure was 13.6 years. Three bushing wear and four locking pin dissociation were diagnosed according to pre-operative radiography. Elbow pain and swelling are the most common clinical symptoms. Severe osteolysis, periprosthetic fracture, and stem loosening were noted in three bushing wear cases. In four dissociation of locking pin cases, breakage of male locking pin phalanges was demonstrated in two patients. For revision procedures, both the locking pins and bushings were replaced. No patients in the study required additional surgery after the revision operation for linked component failure. CONCLUSION: Osteolysis, component loosening, periprosthetic fracture may be expected after linked component failure. Patients should be regularly followed up from short-term to long-term with radiography. Early diagnosis and intervention with linked component exchange can prevent extensive revision surgery.

Long-term outcomes of Kudo type-5 unlinked surface-replacing total elbow arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: a 15-year average follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) has been used for various conditions including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). While the Kudo TEA has been associated with favorable short-term outcomes, there is limited information on the longer term outcomes of this device. The aim of this study was to investigate the average 15-year outcome of Kudo type-5 TEA in patients with RA. METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 29 elbows in 28 patients (Larsen grade III, n = 8; IV, n = 19; V, n = 2) with RA who underwent Kudo type-5 TEA between 1999 and 2010. The patients were followed up for a mean of 15 (range: 10-21) years. We investigated the survival with setting revision/removal as the endpoints. The risk factors for revision/loosening were assessed. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in elbow flexion after Kudo TEA. Preoperative and postoperative Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved significantly from 60.3 to 94.7. Complications included intraoperative medial humeral epicondyle fracture (n = 2), postoperative dislocations (n = 4), deep infections (n = 1), and persistent ulnar nerve neuropathy (n = 1). Aseptic loosening was observed in 7 elbows (24.1%; humerus, n = 3; ulna, n = 3; both sides, n = 1). The causes of the 5 revisions were postoperative dislocation (n = 1), deep infection (n = 1), aseptic loosening of the humerus (n = 2), and aseptic loosening of the ulna (n = 1). All 5 elbows underwent revision of the ulnar component (n = 2) or the linked TEA (n = 3). The survival rate was 81% at 15 years after surgery with setting revision/removal as the endpoints. A deviation of ulnar component insertion angle of over 5° in any plane was associated with more revision compared to those with accurately placed implants. CONCLUSION: The Kudo type-5 elbow showed good results for up to 15 years of follow-up. However, excessive deviation of insertion angle of the ulnar component (over 5°) was associated with more revision. Due to the small sample size, robust statistical analysis of risk factors for postoperative complications or revision could not be performed, and further research is warranted to resolve this limitation.

[Clinical results of total elbow arthroplasty after treatment failure for Monteggia-like injuries]. / Klinische Ergebnisse der Ellenbogentotalendoprothetik nach Therapieversagen bei Monteggia-like-Verletzungen.

BACKGROUND: Monteggia-like fractures (MLF) are complex injuries with high complication rates and frequently unsatisfying clinical results. Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) represents the only option to salvage the functional requirements in some patients with pronounced posttraumatic arthropathy. This case series provides clinical results of TEA following failed treatment of MLF. METHODS: All patients who underwent TEA from 2017 to 2022 for failed treatment of MLF were retrospectively included in this study. Complications and revisions before and after TEA and functional results, measured by the Broberg/Morrey score, were evaluated. RESULTS: In this study 9 patients with a mean age of 68 (±7; 54-79) years were included. The mean follow-up was 12 (±9; 2-27) months. The main reasons leading to posttraumatic arthropathy were chronic infections (44.4%), bony instability due to coronoid deficiency (33.3%) or a combined coronoid and radial head deficiency (22.2%) and non-union of the proximal ulna with radial head necrosis (11.1%). The mean number of surgical revisions between primary fixation and TEA was 2.7 (±1.8; 0-6). The revision rate following TEA was 44%. The mean Broberg/Morrey score at the time of the latest follow-up was 83 (±10; 71-97) points. CONCLUSION: Chronic infection and coronoid deficiency are the main reasons for posttraumatic arthropathy after MLF leading to TEA. While the overall clinical results are satisfying, the indications should be reserved for selected cases due to high revision rates.

Comparison of baseline demographics and risk factors for aseptic loosening following primary total elbow arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening is a feared complication following total elbow arthroplasty (TEA); however, literature regarding factors that may contribute to this complication is limited. The aims of this investigation were to: (1) compare baseline demographics of patients who developed aseptic loosening following primary TEA; and (2) identify patient-specific risk factors for the development of loosening. METHODS: Retrospective analysis using a nationwide claims database was performed to identify patients who underwent primary TEA and developed aseptic loosening within 2 years (study n = 307, control n = 10,741). Multivariate regression analysis generated odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and p-value of risk factors. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Patients who developed aseptic loosening had significant differences in numerous demographics, including age (p = 0.0001), sex (p = 0.0251), and various comorbid conditions such as obesity (15.96% vs. 8.36%, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the risk factors most associated with aseptic loosening were obesity (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.18-2.28, p = 0.002), male sex (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.13-2.00, p = 0.004), and concomitant opioid use disorder (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.14-2.15, p = 0.004). DISCUSSION: This study is the first to identify demographics and patient-related risk factors associated with aseptic loosening following primary TEA. This evidence could be applied to the clinical setting in order to educate at-risk patients of this potential complication as well as inform their post-operative clinical management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III: Prognostic.

Intraoperative modification of total elbow arthroplasty implants.

BACKGROUND: Modification of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) implants may be necessary in selected patients with substantial anatomic bone deformity or those undergoing revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence and consequences of implant modifications during TEA at our institution. We hypothesized that TEA implant modification would be more common in revisions than in primary replacements, and that it would not be associated with worse clinical outcomes or increased rates of radiographic or surgical complications directly related to the implant modification. METHODS: Elbows that had undergone TEA by any of 3 surgeons at our institution with use of intraoperative implant modification between January 1992 and October 2019 were retrospectively reviewed for the type of modification and complications. Complications were classified as definitely related, probably related, possibly related, or nonrelated to the implant's modification according to the consensus review by the 3 senior surgeons. A survey was sent out to surgeons outside of our institution to investigate whether intraoperative modification to TEA implants is a common clinical practice. RESULTS: A total of 106 implant components were modified during 94 of 731 TEA procedures (13%) in 84 of 560 patients. Implant modifications were performed in 60 of 285 revision cases (21%) compared with 34 of 446 (8%) primary cases (P < .0001). These included shortening the stem in 40 (44%), bending the stem in 16 (15%), notching the stem in 16 (15%), tapering the stem in 9 (9%), and a combination of 2 or more of these modifications in 19 implants (17%). Among the 55 index surgeries available for complication analysis, 40 complications occurred in 28 index surgeries (11 primary and 17 revisions; 25 patients), making the overall complication rate 51%. Of these 40 complications, 23 were considered independent of any implant modification. Of the remaining 17 complications, 9 were considered nonrelated to the implant modification, 6 were possibly related, and 2 were probably related to the implant modification. Therefore, the complication rate possibly related or probably related to implant modification was 15% (8 of 55). No complication was classified as definitely related to the implant modification. No implant breakage or malfunction occurred after any modification. A total of 442 survey responses were received representing 29 countries, of which 144 surgeons (39%) performed modification to implants during TEA procedures. DISCUSSION: This study confirmed our hypothesis that modification of TEA implants is not uncommon at our institution, particularly in revision arthroplasty. Surgeons should keep in mind that complications possibly related or probably related to implant modification were at minimum 15% and could have been as high as 30% if the patients lost to follow-up had all had complications. Implant modification may be necessary in some cases but should be exercised with thoughtful consideration and caution.

Comparison of total elbow arthroplasty complications between various surgical indications at 90-day and 1-year follow-up in 1600 elbows.

BACKGROUND: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) was traditionally a mainstay of treatment for patients with severe inflammatory arthritis. Recently, the indications for TEA have expanded, and TEA has grown into a versatile procedure that can be used to treat several pathologies of the elbow. The objective of this study was to compare complication rates between TEAs performed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), fracture (FX), or osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease [DJD]). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the MUExtr data set of the PearlDiver national database was performed. International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes were used to identify patients who underwent TEA from 2010-2020 and to separate them into RA, FX, and DJD cohorts. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and hospital data were identified and compared using analysis of variance. Systemic complications at 90 days and surgical complications at both 90 days and 1 year were compared using multivariable logistic regression. Surgical complications included wound dehiscence, hematoma, deep infection, periprosthetic FX, stiffness, instability, triceps injury, nerve injury, and need for revision. RESULTS: We identified 1600 patients (DJD, 38.9%; FX, 48.8%; and RA, 12.3%). The majority of patients in all 3 cohorts were female patients, with the RA group having a significantly higher percentage of female patients than the FX and DJD groups (87.3% vs. 81.4% and 76.9%, respectively; P = .003). No significant differences in systemic complications and surgical complications were noted between all 3 groups at 90 days postoperatively. After controlling for patient factors, FX patients were more likely to have elbow stiffness (odds ratio, 1.53; P = .006) and less likely to have a triceps injury (odds ratio, 0.26; P < .001) at 1 year than were RA or DJD patients. CONCLUSION: The indications for TEA have expanded over the past 10 years, with nearly half of all cases being performed for FX. At 1 year postoperatively, TEAs performed for FX have a significantly lower rate of triceps injury and higher rate of elbow stiffness than TEAs performed for other indications. This finding is important to consider when preoperatively planning, as well as when discussing expected outcomes with patients prior to surgery, especially with the expanded incidence of TEA for FX being performed over the past decade.

[Radial head arthropolasty in unreconstructable comminuted fractures of the radial head: Long-term results and factors influencing the outcome]. / Langzeitverlauf und Einflussfaktoren auf das Outcome nach endoprothetischem Ersatz des Radiuskopfes bei nichtrekonstruierbaren Frakturen.

BACKGROUND: Radial head arthroplasty is recognized as the gold standard in the treatment of patients with unreconstructable radial head fractures. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the long-term results after prosthetic replacement of the radial head and in a subgroup analysis to identify factors which influence the outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 48 patients with unreconstructable fractures of the radial head and neck were treated by cementless radial head arthroplasty between 05/2008 and 10/2018 (30 bipolar prosthesis type rHead Recon, 18 monopolar prosthesis type MoPyc). After a mean follow-up of 4.6 years 39 patients were assessed clinically and radiologically. RESULTS: The median MEP score was 95 points. Compared to the uninjured side the median range of motion was reduced by 10° for extension/flexion as well as for pronation/supination. In 36 of 39 cases an osseous integration of the prosthesis could be documented. One prosthesis had to be removed after 23 months because of painful loosening. Overlengthening was present in 11 cases (28%), 25 patients (64%) had subcollar bone resorption with a stable osteointegrated stem. Nonbridging heterotopic ossification was observed in 15 patients (38%), 16 patients (41%) showed posttraumatic arthrosis. Patients with sustained elbow dislocation had a significantly worse function in the MEP score and tended to develop an arthrosis more frequently. Ulnohumeral joint degeneration was significantly increased when overlengthening was present. CONCLUSION: Radial head arthroplasty is an effective treatment option for unreconstructable fractures of the radial head and can provide good to excellent mid-term to long-term results. Sustained elbow dislocation as well as overlengthening of the prosthesis had a negative impact on the clinical outcome.

A case of neuropathic arthropathy of the elbow with early loosening after total elbow arthroplasty.

We reported the case of a 65-year-old woman who presented with neuropathic arthropathy of the elbow and had undergone cervical spinal cord tumour resection at 32 years of age. Open synovectomy with free-body resection was performed; however, the instability of the elbow joint rapidly progressed. Therefore, we performed total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) using a linked-type prosthesis. However, the humeral stem became severely loosened 1 year after arthroplasty. Furthermore, a periprosthetic humeral fracture developed due to a minor trauma. A revision TEA using a long-stem prosthesis was performed 4 years after the primary TEA. Radiographs taken 2 years after the revision surgery showed no evidence of implant loosening. In this case, early postoperative loosening occurred despite the use of a linked-type prosthesis and an appropriate cementing technique, suggesting that normal implants may not provide sufficient fixation for neuropathic arthropathy of the elbow. Since surgery for neuropathic arthropathy generally has a poor prognosis, surgical interventions including TEA should be carefully considered.

Comparison of 90-day complication rates and readmissions of primary total elbow arthroplasty in elective and traumatic cases: a single center experience.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to compare the 90 day complication rates of primary Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) performed for arthritis (primary-OA; rheumatoid arthritis-RA) versus those performed for distal humerus fractures (DHF). METHODS: Patients who underwent a TEA from 2015 to 2021 were identified from our institutional database and placed into cohorts based on surgical indications (TEA-OA, TEA-RA and TEA-DHF). Chart review was conducted to analyze the prevalence of complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and secondary procedures in the first 90 day post-operative period. Complications included but were not limited to wound complications, hematoma, infection (superficial or deep), nerve palsy, periprosthetic fracture/failure and others. RESULTS: 49 patients who underwent TEA were included in this study: (DHF = 19, OA = 14, RA = 16). Six complications occurred within the first 90 days of surgery. There were two periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) in the OA group, requiring irrigation and debridement (I & D) within the first 90 days of surgery. There were three post-operative ulnar nerve palsies and one PJI requiring I & D in the TEA-RA group. Compared to the TEA-DHF and TEA-OA groups, the RA group had higher rates of all-cause complications (p = 0.03) and nerve palsy (p = 0.03). There were no significant differences between groups in readmissions (p = 0.27) or secondary interventions (p = 0.27). CONCLUSION: The 90-day complication/readmission rates of TEA preformed for DHFs is lower than those preformed for OA and RA. These differences could be related to the underlying chronic inflammatory etiology and side effect of treatments (intraarticular steroid injection, and biologics) received by patients with arthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study, level IV.

Short-term Effectiveness of a Modified Osteotomy for Total Elbow Joint Replacement in Patients of Hemophilic Elbow Arthritis with Severe Flexion Contracture Deformity: A Three-Cases Series Report.

OBJECTIVE: To report the modified osteotomy and the short-term effectiveness of the total elbow joint replacement in patients of hemophilic elbow arthritis with severe flexion contracture deformity. METHODS: This study introduced the therapeutic approach of the total elbow joint replacement in patients of hemophilic elbow arthritis with severe flexion contracture deformity, and assessed the short-term effectiveness in three cases (three elbows) of end-stage hemophilic elbow arthritis admitted from October 2020 to December 2020. The included patients were all diagnosed with hemophilia A (factor VII deficiency), accompanied by severe bilateral elbow joint flexion contracture, which seriously affects daily life and requires surgical intervention. Clinical data and follow-up results were analyzed before total elbow arthroplasty and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Pre- and postoperative range of motion, pain score, and function score were compared, and intraoperative and postoperative complications are reported. RESULTS: All three patients were male, with an average age of 31 years. The main clinical manifestations were bilateral elbow arthritis with flexion contracture. Two of the patients underwent right elbow replacement, and one patient underwent left elbow replacement. All cases were followed up for 6 months postoperatively. No incision infection or ulnar nerve injury occurred. Postoperative triceps brachii muscle strength was slightly weakened compared with preoperative muscle strength. Average elbow flexion and extension range of motion was 60° (30°-100°) preoperatively and increased to 127° (110°-140°) postoperatively; rotational range of motion of the affected forearm was 47° (10°-85°) preoperatively and increased to 117° postoperatively. The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) was 6 (5-8) preoperatively and decreased to 3 (2-4) postoperatively. The mean MEPS score was 62 (55-75) and increased to 87 (80-95) postoperatively. During the follow-up, anteroposterior and lateral radiographs showed no signs of prosthesis loosening in the elbow. CONCLUSIONS: For severe hemophilic elbow arthritis patients, the short-term treatment effect of total elbow replacement is good, following the strict adherence to the surgical indications and proper preparation for the perioperative period. The modified osteotomy can fully expose the visual field and reduce complications of ulnar nerve injury. The long-term effects need to be study future.

Coonrad-Morrey total elbow arthroplasty implications in young patients with post-traumatic sequelae.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) performed for trauma sequelae in patients <45 years of age. METHODS: This retrospective study included 63 patients aged <45 years who underwent TEA between 2005 and 2017 for previous elbow injuries. The average follow-up period was 5.23 years (range, 2-13 years). The clinical analysis included limb function according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Oxford Elbow Score, and range of motion. The degree of radiolucency was determined using plain radiographic images. RESULTS: The average amplitude of elbow flexion/extension increased from 49.1 ± 36.7 to 98.7 ± 28.2 (P < .01), and the average amplitude of elbow pronation/supination increased from 87.2 ± 52.3 to 118.7 ± 26.3 (P = .02). Functional results improved from 21.4 ± 13.1 to 67.3 ± 14.5 (P < .01) on the Mayo scale, and those measured according to the Oxford scale improved from 15.4% ± 7.0% to 28.0% ± 10.6% (P < .01). Complications were observed in 16 (32.7%) patients. Among them, 10 patients (20.4%) required revision elbow arthroplasty with replacement of implant components. The overall 5-year implant survival rate was 79.4% (95% confidence interval: 63.4-91.2), and the 10-year survival rate was 77.5% (95% confidence interval: 59.3-88.2). CONCLUSION: TEA allows restoration of the full range of motion in the elbow joint and significantly improves limb function in most cases. However, the low survival rate of implants and high incidence of complications do not permit TEA to become a routine intervention for treating post-traumatic consequences in young patients.

A unique salvage operation strategy: implantation of the ulnar total elbow component to the radius to overcome large ulnar bone defect caused by infection after total elbow arthroplasty.

The elbow joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are often destroyed, and total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is one treatment for these patients. However, patients with RA tend to develop surgical site infections due to immunosuppression. Once an implant is infected, reoperation may be difficult because of the risk of reinfection. In such patients, the infected site must be debrided thoroughly, although this might reduce the bone scaffold needed for re-TEA. We used a unique method to manage a large ulnar bone defect and an infected implant. The patient with RA had undergone TEA 15 years earlier. Etanercept was initiated to control disease activity; however, this treatment led to infection of the elbow prosthesis. Several surgical debridements were performed to eradicate the bacteria, which improved the symptoms of infection. However, most of the proximal ulna was lost, and it seemed impossible to fix the prosthesis using the remaining small ulna after debridement. Therefore, we planned to implant the ulnar component into the radius as a salvage technique. With this procedure, we provided the patient with elbow mobility and eradicated the infection. This is an alternative method for restoring function in an elbow with a massive bone defect in the ulna.

Outcomes of radial head implants in total elbow arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the management of the radial head in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA). In 3-part TEA designs, options include radial head retention, excision, or arthroplasty. Biomechanical studies suggest improved varus-valgus stability with radial head implants in unlinked total elbows. Unfortunately, complications with radial head implants have been common with historical designs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of radial head implants in a current 3-part TEA and identify risk factors for mechanical failure. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of radial head implants with a 3-part convertible TEA from 2001 to 2016. Clinical outcomes, functional scores, and radiographic outcomes were recorded. The preoperative radiocapitellar alignment was measured using the radiocapitellar ratio (RCR). Statistics include descriptive statistics, t tests, logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: We identified 44 TEAs in 40 patients, with a mean follow-up period of 7.2 years. The average age at surgery was 58 ± 11 years; 80% of the TEAs were performed in women. The indication for surgery was rheumatoid arthritis in 86%; of the implants, 61% were unlinked. The average preoperative RCR was 10.7 ± 17.9. Postoperatively, 2 radial head implants (5%) were subluxated, 6 (14%) were dissociated, and 2 (5%) were dissociated with implant dislocation on radiographic review. The revision rate for radial head subluxation, dissociation, or dislocation was 7% (n = 3). Univariate logistic regression showed that male sex (P = .002), abnormal preoperative RCR (P = .02), linked implant (P = .03), and older age (P = .04) were risk factors for radial head subluxation, dissociation, or implant dislocation. A multivariate model with all 4 variables did not demonstrate statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The incidence of radial head arthroplasty subluxation, dissociation, or implant dislocation was high (23%). In a univariate logistic regression model, male sex, abnormal preoperative RCR, and linked implants were all statistically significant risk factors for mechanical failure of the radial head implant. Our multivariate model did not show any statistically significant independent risk factors. Polyethylene wear or loosening of the radial head implants was not observed in this study; failure of the bipolar linkage was the principal mode of failure. Although further study is required, caution should be used when considering inserting a radial head implant in male patients with significant preoperative radiocapitellar malalignment. Radial head subluxation or dissociation is not an absolute indication for revision in an asymptomatic patient. Improvements in radial head implant designs in TEA are needed.

Triceps Insufficiency After Total Elbow Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of triceps insufficiency after total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) varies in the literature, and a consensus on treatment strategy is lacking. We review the incidence, the risk factors, the clinical presentation, and the diagnosis and treatment of triceps insufficiency after TEA. Based on this information, we have formulated recommendations for clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature from January 2003 to April 2020 to identify studies that investigated triceps function following TEA by searching the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases. Eligible studies (1) reported on triceps function following primary or revision TEA for every indication, regardless of technique (e.g., bone grafts), (2) included ≥6 adult patients, (3) had the full-text article available, and (4) had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. RESULTS: Eighty studies with a total of 4,825 TEAs were included. The quality was low in 15 studies, moderate in 64 studies, and high in 1 study. The mean incidence of triceps insufficiency was 4.5%. The rates were highest in patients after revision TEA (22%), in those with posttraumatic arthritis as an indication for surgery (10.2%), and after a triceps-reflecting approach (4.9%). Most studies used the Medical Research Council scale to score triceps function, although cutoff points and the definition of triceps insufficiency differed among studies. Surgical treatment showed favorable results with anconeus tendon transfer and Achilles allograft repair when compared with direct repair. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of triceps insufficiency varies greatly, probably due to a lack of consensus on the definition of the term. Therefore, we recommend the guidelines for clinical practice that are presented in this article. These guidelines assist clinicians in providing the best possible treatment strategy for their patients and help researchers optimize their future study designs in order to compare outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Efficacy of 2-stage revision using a prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement spacer with or without cortical strut allograft in infected total elbow arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a self-manufactured prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement (PROSTALAC) spacer with or without cortical strut allograft in infected total elbow arthroplasty. METHODS: Between March 2009 and February 2018, we enrolled 18 patients (mean age, 66.9 years) who underwent 2-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic infection following total elbow arthroplasty. After implant removal in the first stage, we performed débridement and PROSTALAC insertion. During the second stage, we performed reimplantation using a cortical strut allograft for patients with a considerably severe bone defect. The mean follow-up period was 34 months (range, 25-60 months), during which we evaluated the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), range of motion (ROM), and blood markers. RESULTS: In all 18 patients, infection control was ensured using intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks or IV antibiotics for 4 weeks converting to oral antibiotics for 2 weeks following PROSTALAC insertion. The mean visual analog scale score improved from 8 points preoperatively to 2 points postoperatively, and the mean MEPS improved from 32 points preoperatively to 82 points postoperatively (P < .05). The average ROMs at the last follow-up were 9° to 132° from extension to flexion, respectively. Two patients experienced ulnar nerve neuropraxia after surgery, from which they were resolved. Moreover, 2 and 4 patients developed superficial wound infection and triceps insufficiency, respectively, and there was no infection recurrence. CONCLUSION: In the management of elbow prosthetic infection, 2-stage revision arthroplasty using PROSTALAC spacer insertion in the first stage and cortical strut allograft in the second stage for patients with severe bone defect revealed good clinical results and relatively low infection recurrence rates. However, the complication rate is substantial.

Complex fractures of the distal humerus in the elderly: primary total elbow arthroplasty or open reduction and internal fixation? Mid-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the mid-term outcomes in intra-articular distal humerus fracture (AO/OTA type C) treated with either open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) or total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) in patients older than 75 years and with more than five years of follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective study including 24 patients (11 TEA vs. 13 ORIF) with a mean age of 82 years and being all females. Results assessed included (1) radiographic measures; (2) functional results: range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), quick-DASH; and (3) complications. RESULTS: TEA group vs. ORIF group achieved a mean flexion of 117° ± 9.6° vs. 106° ± 14°, extension loss of 38° ± 17° vs. 30.8° ± 16°, pronation 75° ± 5° vs. 85° ± 7° and supination 75° ± 4° vs. 70° ± 5°. Mean MEPS score was 71.6 vs. 83.6 (p = .183) and mean quick-DASH was 44.8 vs. 42.6 (p = .789). All 13 patients in the ORIF group demonstrated radiographic signs of bone union and none underwent conversion to TEA. Sixty-three percent of the patients in the TEA group underwent re-operation at an average of 72 months (62.4-75.2 months), including three  for periprosthetic fracture and four  for implant loosening. Whereas in the ORIF group, 23% of the patients were re-operated upon excluding olecranon osteotomy hardware, two  for stiffness, and one  for an olecranon tension band wire failure. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no differences in mid-term functional outcomes between either treatment, our results suggest that the recent trend towards the use of TEA instead of ORIF in the elderly should be re-examined due to the high rate of complications beyond five  years of follow-up with TEA.

Elbow arthroplasty complicated by Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is an orthopedic procedure that is relatively infrequently performed, but its use has been increasing over time. Infection remains one of the most concerning complications after TEA, although Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) as a microbial etiology, is extremely rare. Here, we present a case of M. tuberculosis infection after TEA. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 45-year-old woman underwent TEA for severe traumatic arthritis of the elbow following failure of conservative treatment. Four months after TEA, the patient experienced progressive elbow pain and swelling, without other external signs of infection such as a sensation of local heating and erythematous alterations. DIAGNOSIS: Pulmonary computed tomography showed stable pulmonary TB in the right upper lobe. The T-SPOT, TB, and purified protein derivative test results were positive, and M. tuberculosis exhibited growth on cultures. The final diagnosis was periprosthetic infection of M. tuberculosis. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with debridement with submission of deep tissue cultures. According to these cultures and suggestions of a bacteriologist, anti-TB treatment was administered for 12 months. OUTCOMES: The symptoms of the infection were controlled, and the prosthesis was retained. At the time of writing this case report, the elbow prosthesis had survived for more than 2 years, and no recurrent infection had been observed. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of TB infection after TEA is difficult to confirm due to its nonspecific signs and symptoms. Despite the extremely low incidence, failure to consider this possibility for diagnosis can lead to delayed treatment. Proper diagnosis allows for antitubercular therapy with retention of a prosthesis.