Association between history of cannabis use and outcomes after total hip or knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Cannabis use may be increasing as countries legalize it and it becomes socially acceptable. A history of cannabis use may increase risk of complications after various kinds of surgery and compromise functional recovery. Here we systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed available evidence on how history of cannabis use affects recovery after hip or knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched and studies were selected and analyzed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, while quality of evidence was evaluated according to the "Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation" system. Data on various outcomes were pooled when appropriate and meta-analyzed. Results: The systematic review included 16 cohort studies involving 5.91 million patients. Meta-analysis linked history of cannabis use to higher risk of the following outcomes: revision (RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.31-2.16), mechanical loosening (RR 1.77, 95% CI 1.52-2.07), periprosthetic fracture (RR 1.85, 95% CI 1.38-2.48), dislocation (RR 2.10, 95% CI 1.18-3.73), cardiovascular events (RR 2.49, 95% CI 1.22-5.08), cerebrovascular events (RR 3.15, 95% CI 2.54-3.91), pneumonia (RR 3.97, 95% CI 3.49-4.51), respiratory failure (RR 4.10, 95% CI 3.38-4.97), urinary tract infection (RR 2.46, 95% CI 1.84-3.28), acute kidney injury (RR 3.25, 95% CI 2.94-3.60), venous thromboembolism (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.34-1.63), and deep vein thrombosis (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.19-1.70). In addition, cannabis use was associated with significantly greater risk of postoperative transfusion (RR 2.23, 95% CI 1.83-2.71) as well as higher hospitalization costs. Conclusion: History of cannabis use significantly increases the risk of numerous complications and transfusion after THA or TKA, leading to greater healthcare costs. Clinicians should consider these factors when treating cannabis users, and pre-surgical protocols should give special consideration to patients with history of cannbis use.

Management of periprosthetic hip fractures: current status and prospects; experience of the traumatology and orthopedics department of Mohammed VI University Hospital, Marrakech.

INTRODUCTION: The increase in hip arthroplasties predicts a rise in periprosthetic fractures in Morocco, posing challenges for orthopedic surgeons. Therapeutic strategies vary considerably, highlighting the absence of a universally accepted treatment protocol. AIM: To analyze the management of per-prosthetic hip fractures, while addressing the challenges associated with them. METHODS: This was a retrospective study, conducted in the trauma-orthopedics department between December 2015 and November 2022. Nineteen patients who presented to the hospital with fractures around a hip prosthesis were included. RESULT: Nineteen periprosthetic fractures were observed. The majority of patients (68%) were women, with an average age of 68. The Vancouver classification showed that 52.6% of the fractures were type B1, and 21.1% type C, while the other fracture types were distributed differently. These fractures were mainly associated with diagnoses such as femoral neck fracture (63.2%) and coxarthrosis (31.6%). We observed variations in treatment recommendations and results between the different series analyzed. We noted discrepancies with certain series concerning fracture types and therapeutic choices. However, in our series, we achieved satisfactory results, with successful consolidation and the absence of complications in all patients. CONCLUSION: These results underline the importance of an individualized approach to fracture management, taking into account the specificities of each case.

Do sex, age, and comorbidities modify the association of socioeconomic status and opioid use after total hip arthroplasty?: a population-based study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We aimed to examine the association between socioeconomic status (SES) markers and opioid use after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to osteoarthritis, and whether sex, age, or comorbidities modify any association. METHODS: Using Danish databases, we included 80,038 patients undergoing primary THA (2001-2018). We calculated prevalences and prevalence ratios (PRs with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of immediate post-THA opioid use (≥ 1 prescription within 1 month) and continued opioid use (≥ 1 prescription in 1-12 months) among immediate opioid users. Exposures were individual-based education, cohabitation, and wealth. RESULTS: The prevalence of immediate opioid use was ~45% in preoperative non-users and ~60% in preoperative users (≥ 1 opioid 0-6 months before THA). Among non-users, the prevalences and PRs of continued opioid use were: 28% for low vs. 21% for high education (PR 1.28, CI 1.20-1.37), 27% for living alone vs. 23% for cohabiting (PR 1.09, CI 1.04-1.15), and 30% for low vs. 20% for high wealth (PR 1.43, CI 1.35-1.51). Among users, prevalences were 67% for low vs. 55% for high education (1.22, CI 1.17-1.27), 68% for living alone vs. 60% for cohabiting (PR 1.10, CI 1.07-1.12), and 73% for low wealth vs. 54% for high wealth (PR 1.32, CI 1.28-1.36). Based on testing for interaction, sex, age, and comorbidity did not statistically significant modify the associations. Nevertheless, associations were stronger in younger patients for all SES markers (mainly for non-users). CONCLUSION: Markers of low SES were associated with a higher prevalence of continued post-THA opioid use. Age modified the magnitude of the associations, but it was not statistically significant.

Bilateral simultaneous hip and knee replacement: an epidemiological nationwide study from 2001 to 2016.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have compared the pros and cons of simultaneous bilateral versus staged bilateral hip and knee replacement but the outcomes of these two surgical options remains a matter of controversy. This study aimed to evaluate demographic features, incidence and hospitalization rates of bilateral one stage total hip and knee arthroplasty in Italy. METHODS: The Italian Ministry of Health's National Hospital Discharge Reports (SDO) were used to gather data. This study referred to the adult population (+ 20 years of age) from 2001 to 2015 for hip arthroplasty and from 2001 to 2016 for knee arthroplasty. RESULTS: Overall, 1,544 bilateral simultaneous hip replacement were carried out. The incidence rate was 0.21 cases per 100,000 adult Italian residents. Male/female ratio was 1.1. The average days of hospital stay was 11.7 ± 11.8 days. The main primary codified diagnosis was: osteoarthrosis, localized, primary, pelvic region and thigh (ICD code: 715.15). 2,851 bilateral simultaneous knee replacement were carried out. The incidence rate was 0.37 cases per 100,000 adult Italian residents. Male/female ratio was 0.6. The average days of hospital stay was 7.7 ± 5.8 days. The main primary codified diagnosis was: osteoarthrosis, localized, primary, lower leg (ICD code: 715.16). CONCLUSIONS: The burden of hip and knee osteoarthrosis as a leading cause of bilateral joint replacement is significant in Italy. The national registers' longitudinal analysis may provide data for establishing international guidelines regarding the appropriate indications for one stage bilateral simultaneous hip or knee replacement versus two stage.

Mini-Navigation Utilization in THA Results in Shorter Length of Stay, Increased Home Discharge, and Higher Physical Therapy Mobilization Scores Compared to THA Without Navigation.

BACKGROUND: As volume of total hip arthroplasty (THA) continues to increase, the utilization and availability of in-traoperative advanced technologies to arthroplasty surgeons continues to rise as well. Our primary goal was to determine whether the use of a mini navigation technology extended operative times and secondarily if it affected postoperative outcomes following elective THA. METHODS: A single-institution total joint arthroplasty da-tabase was utilized to identify adult patients who underwent elective THA from 2017 to 2019. Baseline demographic data along with surgical operative time, length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition were collected. The Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) was used to determine physi-cal therapy progress. RESULTS: A total of 1,162 THAs were performed of which 69.1% (803) used navigation while 30.9% (359) did not. Baseline demographics including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), insurance, and smoking status were not statistically different between groups. The operative time was shorter in the navigation group compared to THA without navigation (115.1 vs. 118.9 min, p < 0.0001). Mean LOS was signifi-cantly shorter in the navigation THA group as compared to THA without navigation (2.1 vs. 2.6 days, p < 0.0001). Postoperative AM-PAC scores were higher in the navigation group on postoperative day 1 as compared to patients with-out navigation (18.87 vs. 17.52, p < 0.0001). Additionally, a greater percentage of patients were discharged directly home after THA with navigation as compared to THA without navigation (89.54% vs. 83.57%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that hip navigation technology in the setting of THA is associated with reduced operative times and higher AM-PAC mobilization scores. Hip mini navigation technology shortens operative times while improving early patient outcome scores in association with shorter LOS and greater home-based discharge.

Trends in Incidence of Hip Fracture and Hip Replacement in Denmark, 1996 to 2018.

Importance: The past several decades have witnessed substantial changes in treatments that are particularly relevant for older patients. Objectives: To assess changes in national-level incidence rates of fracture- and musculoskeletal-related (ie, arthritis-related) hip replacement procedures for individuals aged 40 to 104 years over a 23-year period in Denmark. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used national Danish health registers to include the Danish population aged 40 to 104 years from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 2018. Data were analyzed from May 31, 2022, to February 14, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Age- and period-specific incidence rates of hip fracture and hip replacement stratified on fracture-related vs arthritis-related indication. Results: From 1996 to 2018, a total of 3 664 979 individuals were followed up for a mean (SD) of 14.6 (7.7) years, resulting in a follow-up time of 53 517 861 person-years and 158 982 (first) hip fractures, of which 42 825 involved fracture-related hip replacement procedures. A further 104 422 individuals underwent arthritis-related hip replacement. During the first 2 decades of the 21st century, hip fracture rates declined by 35% to 40% for individuals aged 70 to 104 years, and the proportion of the population undergoing fracture-related hip replacement increased by 50% to 70%, with modest variation across those aged 75 to 99 years. Rates of arthritis-related hip replacements peaked for individuals aged 75 to 79 years, but with the largest relative rate increase (75%-100%) occurring for those aged 80 to 94 years, primarily from 2001 to 2015, whereafter it remained nearly unchanged. The decline in rates of arthritis-related hip replacement after 75 to 79 years of age was gradual and did not suggest an upper age limit for access to arthritis-related hip replacement. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that during the past several decades in Denmark, the incidence of hip fractures declined by 35% to 40% among patients aged 80 to 104 years, while the proportion receiving fracture-related hip replacement remained relatively constant after 75 years of age. During the first decades of the 21st century, arthritis-related hip replacement incidence increased by 50% to 100% among older patients and stabilized hereafter, with no apparent cutoff age for this type of procedure. These patterns indicate a positive overall trend with declining hip fracture incidence over the last decades in Denmark, and the observed hip replacement incidence suggests that age is currently not a major determining factor guiding this type of surgery.

[Considerable regional differences in patient injuries after primary hip and knee arthroplasty and between orthopedic departments depending on surgical volume]. / Regional skillnad i incidensen av skador efter ledprotesoperation.

Hip and knee arthroplasties are mostly successful procedures; however, patient injuries may occur and should be reported to Löf, the Swedish patient insurance. This study investigated the incidence of patient injuries after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty in the Swedish regions, differences in incidence depending on annual surgical volume, and types of approved injuries. Approved patient injuries were related to the total number of hip and knee arthroplasties registered in the Swedish Arthroplasty Register 2012-2021. The national incidence was 11.4 and 8.1 per 1,000 hip and knee arthroplasties respectively and varied in the regions from 30.4 to 4.9 and 15.4 to 5.4 per 1,000 hip and knee arthroplasties respectively. Orthopedic departments with higher annual volumes of performed arthroplasties had a lower proportion of patient injuries. Infection was the most common patient injury, followed by nerve lesions and mechanical complications. The differences may be due to underreporting and varying quality of care in the regions. A centralization of hip and knee arthroplasties may be beneficial.

Incidence of knee and hip joint replacement associated with cumulative exposure to physical factors at work.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) has been quite consistently associated with high physical workload and specific physical factors at work, while for hip OA, fewer studies are available, which still indicate possible associations with heavy lifting and physical workload. The objective of the study was to assess the association between exposure to workplace physical factors and incidence of knee and hip arthroplasty, as markers of severe OA in these joints. METHODS: The study population was composed of employees 25-60 years who participated in the Turin 2011 census. For each job held since 1995, exposure to physical factors was assigned to individuals in the cohort through a Job-Exposure Matrix constructed from the Italian O*NET database. Using Poisson regression models, the incidence of knee and hip arthroplasty for OA, identified through hospitalizations from 2012 to 2018, was examined in relation to cumulative exposure to 7 different physical hazards and a composite indicator of physical workload constructed from 17 physical factors (Ergo-Index). RESULTS: The risk of knee OA was significantly increased in the highest cumulative exposure quartile of physical workload (incidence rate ratio = 1.98, 95% confidence interval: 1.24-3.16) and of all single hazards examined, compared to the lowest quartile, with significant trends in risk with increasing exposure. In contrast, no association was found with hip OA, whose relative risks were close to or below one in all higher-exposure quartiles of physical workload and of each single hazard. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that exposure to physical hazards at work increases the likelihood of developing knee OA, but not hip OA.

Factors influencing patient selection of orthopaedic surgeons for total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

INTRODUCTION: The importance of identifying how patients choose their healthcare providers has grown with the prevalence of consumer-centric health insurance plans. There is currently a lack of studies exploring the factors associated with how patients select their hip and knee joint arthroplasty surgeons. The purpose of this study was to determine how patients find their arthroplasty providers and the relative importance of various arthroplasty surgeon characteristics. METHODS: An electronic mail survey was sent to 3522 patients who had visited our institution for an arthroplasty surgeon office visit between August 2022 and January 2023. The survey consisted of multiple-choice questions, which aimed to inquire about the patients' referral sources for their current arthroplasty surgeon. In addition, patients were requested to rate the significance of 22 surgeon-related factors, on a scale of 1 (Not Important At All) to 5 (Very Important), in choosing their arthroplasty surgeon. RESULTS: Of the 3522 patients that received the survey, 538 patients responded (15.3%). The most common referral sources were physician referral (50.2%), family/friend referral (27.7%), and self-guided research (24.5%). Of those that were referred by a physician, 54.4% of respondents were referred by another orthopaedic provider. Patients rated board certification (4.72 ± 0.65), in-network insurance status (4.66 ± 0.71), fellowship training (4.50 ± 0.81), bedside manner/personality (4.32 ± 0.86), and facility appearance (4.26 ± 0.81) as the five most important factors in picking an arthroplasty surgeon. Television (1.42 ± 0.83), print (1.50 ± 0.88), and online (1.58 ± 0.93) advertisements, along with social media presence (1.83 ± 1.08), and practice group size (2.97 ± 1.13) were rated as the five least important factors. CONCLUSION: Patients are most likely to select an arthroplasty surgeon based on referral from other physicians, namely orthopedic surgeons, in addition to board certification status, in-network insurance, and fellowship training. Overall, these findings highlight the importance of physician credentials and reputation within the orthopaedic community in order to attract and retain patients.

The Impact of Obesity on Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes When Performed by High-Volume Surgeons-A Propensity Matched Analysis From a High-Volume Urban Center.

BACKGROUND: Previous data suggest that obesity does not impact surgical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty performed by high-volume (HV) surgeons. However, this effect has yet to be studied in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of patient obesity on THA outcomes when surgery is performed by HV surgeons. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary, elective THA between January 2012 and December 2022 with a HV surgeon (top 25% of surgeons by number of annual primary THA) was performed. Patients were stratified by their body mass index (BMI) into 3 cohorts: BMI ≥ 40 (morbidly obese [MO]), 30 ≤ BMI < 40 (obese), and BMI < 30 (nonobese); and 1:1:1 propensity matched based on baseline characteristics. A total of 13,223 patients were evaluated, of which 669 patients were included in the final matched analysis (223 patients per group). The average number of annual THAs performed for HV surgeons was 171 cases. RESULTS: The MO patients had significantly longer surgical times (P < .001) and hospital lengths of stay (P < .001). Rates of 90-day readmissions (P = .211) and all-cause, septic, and aseptic revisions at the latest follow-up (P = .268, P = .903, and P = .168, respectively) were comparable between groups. In a subanalysis for non-HV surgeons, MO patients had a significantly greater risk of revision (P = .021) and trended toward significantly greater readmissions (P = .056). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes and complication rates after THA performed by a HV surgeon are similar regardless of patient obesity status. Patients who have MO may experience improved outcomes and reduced procedural risks if they are referred to HV surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Site of Service Disparities Exist for Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The rate of outpatient total joint arthroplasty procedures, including those performed at ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) and hospital outpatient departments, is increasing. The purpose of this study was to analyze if type of insurance is associated with site of service (in-patient vs outpatient) for total joint arthroplasty and adverse outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or total hip arthroplasty (THA) using Current Procedural Terminology codes in a national administrative claims database. Eligible patients were stratified by type of insurance (Medicaid, Medicare, private). The primary outcome was site of service. Secondary outcomes included general complications, procedural complications, and revision procedures. We evaluated the associations using adjusted multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: We identified 951,568 patients for analysis; 46,703 (4.9%) patients underwent UKA, 607,221 (63.8%) underwent TKA, and 297,644 (31.3%) underwent THA. Overall, 9.6% of procedures were outpatient. Patients with Medicaid were less likely than privately insured patients to receive outpatient UKA or THA (UKA: odds ratio [OR], 0.729 [95% CI, 0.640-0.829]; THA: OR, 0.625 [95% CI, 0.557-0.702]) but more likely than patients with Medicare to receive outpatient TKA or THA (TKA: OR, 1.391 [95% CI, 1.315-1.472]; THA: OR, 1.327 [95% CI, 1.166-1.506]). Patients with Medicaid were more likely to experience complications and revision procedures. CONCLUSION: Differences in site of service and complication rates following hip and knee arthroplasty exist based on type of insurance, suggesting a disparity in care. Further exploration of drivers of this disparity is warranted and can inform interventions (eg, progressive value-based payments) to support equity in orthopedic services. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(3):179-184.].

Examining racial disparities in utilization rate and perioperative outcomes following knee and hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Previous arthroplasty utilization research predominantly examined Black and White populations within the US. This is the first known study to examine utilization and complications in poorly studied minority racial groups such as Asians and Native Hawaiian/Pacific-Islanders (NHPI) as compared to Whites. RESULTS: Data from 3304 primary total hip and knee arthroplasty patients (2011 to 2019) were retrospectively collected, involving 1789 Asians (52.2%), 1164 Whites (34%) and 320 Native Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders (NHPI) (9.3%). The 2012 arthroplasty utilization rates for Asian, White, and NHPI increased by 32.5%, 11.2%, and 86.5%, respectively, by 2019. Compared to Asians, Whites more often underwent hip arthroplasty compared to knee arthroplasty (odds ratio (OR) 1.755; p < 0.001). Compared to Asians, Whites and NHPI more often received total knee compared to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (White: OR 1.499; NHPI: OR 2.013; p < 0.001). White patients had longer hospitalizations (2.66 days) compared to Asians (2.19 days) (p = 0.005) following bilateral procedures. Medicare was the most common insurance for Asians (66.2%) and Whites (54.2%) while private insurance was most common for NHPI (49.4%). Compared to Asians, economic status was higher for Whites (White OR 0.695; p < 0.001) but lower for NHPI (OR 1.456; p < 0.001). After controlling for bilateral procedures, NHPI had a lower risk of transfusion compared to Asians (OR 0.478; p < 0.001) and Whites had increased risk of wound or systemic complications compared to Asians (OR 2.086; p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Despite NHPI demonstrating a significantly poorer health profile and lower socioeconomic status, contrary to previous literature involving minority racial groups, no significant overall differences in arthroplasty utilization rates or perioperative complications could be demonstrated amongst the racial groups examined.

General anesthesia is not associated with dementia in older adults with osteoarthritis for hip/knee replacements, a national population-based nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Dementia is a prevalent neurological condition, yet the relationship between dementia and general anesthesia remains uncertain. The study aimed to explore the association between general anesthesia and dementia using a nationwide population-based database. METHODS: The study extracted data from Taiwan's national health insurance, which encompassed the records of one million insured residents. A total of 59,817 patients aged 65 years and above, diagnosed with osteoarthritis between 2002 and 2010, were included. Among these patients, 3277 individuals with an initial diagnosis of dementia between 2004 and 2013 were matched with non-dementia patients based on age, gender, and the date of osteoarthritis diagnosis. Following a 1:2 random matching, the case group included 2171 patients with dementia, while the control group consisted of 4342 patients without dementia. The data was analyzed using conditional and unconditional logistic regressions. RESULTS: No significant differences in the odds of dementia were found between individuals exposed to general and regional anesthesia during hip/knee replacement surgeries (OR = 1.11; 95%CI: 0.73-1.70), after adjusting for age, sex, and co-morbidities. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the odds of dementia based on different durations of anesthesia exposure (General: <2 h: OR = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.43-1.92; 2-4 h: OR = 1.21, 95%CI = 0.82-1.79; >4 h: OR = 0.39, 95%CI = 0.15-1.01; compared to no exposure. Regional: <2 h: OR = 1.18, 95%CI = 0.85-1.62; 2-4 h: OR = 0.9, 95%CI = 0.64-1.27; >4 h: OR = 0.55, 95%CI = 0.15-1.96; compared to no exposure). Likewise, no significant differences were observed in the odds of dementia based on the number of replacement surgeries (twice: OR = 0.74, 95%CI = 0.44-1.23, compared to once). CONCLUSION: Neither general anesthesia nor regional anesthesia in hip/knee surgery was associated with dementia. Different numbers and durations of anesthesia exposure showed no significant differences in the odds for dementia.

Urgent versus elective surgical disparities among American Indian and Alaska Native patients.

BACKGROUND: American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) health issues are understudied despite documentation of lower-than-average life expectancy. Urgent surgery is associated with higher rates of postsurgical complications and postoperative death. We assess whether American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) patients in Washington State are at greater risk of requiring urgent rather than elective surgery compared with non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). METHODS: We accessed data for the period 2009-2014 from the Washington State Comprehensive Hospital Abstract Reporting System (CHARS) database, which captures all statewide hospital admissions, to examine three common surgeries that are performed both urgently and electively: hip replacements, aortic valve replacements, and spinal fusions. We extracted patient race, age, insurance status, comorbidity, admission type, and procedures performed. We then constructed multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with use of urgent surgical care. RESULTS: AIAN patients had lower mean age at surgery for all three surgeries compared with NHW patients. AIAN patients were at higher risk for urgent surgery for hip replacements (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.19-1.88), spinal fusions (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.87), and aortic valve replacements (OR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.12-3.80). CONCLUSION: AIAN patients were more likely to undergo urgent hip replacement, spinal fusion, and aortic valve replacement than NHW patients. AIAN patients underwent urgent surgery at younger ages. Medicaid insurance conferred higher risks for urgent surgery across all surgeries studied. Further research is warranted to more clearly identify the factors contributing to disparities among AIAN patients undergoing urgent surgery.

Prevalence of anemia and association with outcome in joint arthroplasty - is there a difference between primary and revision cases?

PURPOSE: Anemia has been shown to be a modifiable pre-operative, patient factor associated with outcome following arthroplasty. The aims of this retrospective study were to (1) ascertain the prevalence of preoperative anemia in patients undergoing primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty at a tertiary referral center and (2) to test the association with outcome and whether it differs between primary and revision cases. METHODS: All hip and knee primary and revision arthroplasties performed at a Canadian academic, tertiary-care, arthroplasty center between 2012 and 2017 were included in this study. The study group consisted of 5944 patients, of which 5251 were primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties or Hip Resurfacings and 693 were revision arthroplasties (65% hip revisions/35% knee revisions). Anemia was classified as per WHO definition (hemoglobin < 130 g/L for men and < 120 g/L for women). All anemic patients were grouped into mild, moderate or severe anemia. Length-of-stay, perioperative transfusion-rate, 90-day readmission, overall complication rate and reoperation rates were recorded. The effect of preoperative anemia and the effect of severity of the anemia was evaluated through multivariable regression analysis controlling for relevant covariates. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 15% (786/5251) of the primary patients and 47% (322/693) of the revision arthroplasty patients were anemic preoperatively. Anemic revision patients were 3.1 times more likely (95% CI: 1.47-6.33) to obtain blood transfusions during the hospital stay, compared to a 4.9 times higher risk in primary patients. The odds ratio to sustain any postoperative complication if anemic was 1.5 times higher (95% CI: 0.73-3.16) in revision patients and 1.7 in primary cases. In addition, the 90-day readmission rate among both groups was 1.6 times higher in anemic patients. Furthermore, anemic revision patients had a 5.3 days longer length of stay (95% CI: 2.63-7.91), compared to only 1 additional day in anemic primary patients (95% CI: 0.69-1.34). CONCLUSION: In this study cohort, the prevalence of anemia in patients awaiting revision arthroplasty was 3 times higher (46.6%) than in primary arthroplasty patients (18.7%). Preoperative anemia was associated with similarly, inferior outcomes in both groups. To reduce postoperative complications and the "burden" associated with anemia, these findings strongly recommend optimizing the preoperative hemoglobin in all arthroplasty patients. However, revision patients are affected more frequently, and particular attention must therefore be taken to this growing group in the future. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty Places a Disproportionate Burden on Surgeons: A Comparison Using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA TLX).

BACKGROUND: Perceived surgeon workload of performing primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is challenging to quantify. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA TLX) survey was developed to quantify experiences following aviation and has been applied to healthcare fields. Our purposes were to 1) quantify the workload endured by surgeons who are performing primary and revision TKA and THA and 2) compare these values to their Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) reimbursement. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 5 fellowship-trained adult reconstruction surgeons completed NASA TLX surveys following primary and revision TKA/THA cases. A total of 122 surveys consisting of 70 TKA (48 primaries and 22 revisions) and 55 THA surveys (38 primaries and 17 revisions) were completed. Patient demographics and surgical variables were recorded. Final NASA TLX workloads were compared to 2021 CMS work relative value units. RESULTS: Compared to primary TKA, revision TKA had 176% increased intraoperative workload (P < .001), 233% increased mental burden (P < .001), and 150% increased physical burden (P < .001). Compared to primary THA, revision THA had 106% increased intraoperative workload (P < .001), 96% increased mental burden (P < .001), and 91% increased physical burden (P < .001). Operative time was higher in revision versus primary TKA (118 versus 84.5 minutes, P = .05) and THA (150 versus 115 minutes, P = .001). Based upon 2021 CMS data, revision TKA and THA would need to be compensated by an additional 36% and 12.3%, respectively, to parallel intraoperative efforts. CONCLUSIONS: Revision hip and knee arthroplasty places a major mental and physical workload upon surgeons and is disproportionately compensated by CMS.

Experiences with and perception of patient-reported outcome measurement in patients undergoing knee and hip replacement in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures - PROMs - have been developed to provide an assessment of patients' physical function, symptoms, and health-related quality of life. With patient-centered care becoming increasingly important, several national strategies have been initiated for PROM measurement. However, Germany is only at the beginning of this process. The objective of this study is to assess patients' experience with and perception of completing PROMs in patients undergoing knee and hip replacement in Germany. METHODS: This study used survey data from patients undergoing hip or knee replacement surgery in a hospital in Germany. Before surgery, patients completed a PROMs survey. After at least 6 months, patients were re-contacted to fill in a questionnaire about their experiences with and perception of the PROMs data collection. RESULTS: Most patients either agreed or totally agreed that the time to fill in the questionnaire was appropriate (89%), that the purpose of the PROMs collection was clear (85%), that the questionnaire's content applied to their appointment (73%), and that this systematic assessment was beneficial (81%). The corresponding proportions were 54% for feeling productive while waiting and 50% for feeling that the information in the questionnaire affected the patient-doctor interaction positively. Only few significant associations were found between patient characteristics and the favorability of patients' ratings. There were no significant differences between hip and knee replacement surgery patients regarding the favorability rating on any survey question. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that PROMs collection in the context of hip and knee replacement surgery is practicable and partly also perceived beneficial by patients. Orthopedic procedures could serve as a starting point for broader use and routine PROMs collection in Germany.

Understanding the 30-day mortality burden after revision total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging procedure that burdens the healthcare system. Despite being associated with worse outcomes relative to its primary counterpart, postoperative mortality after revision THA remains ill-defined. The present study aimed to (1) establish the overall 30-day mortality rate after revision THA and (2) explore the mortality rate stratified by age, comorbidity burden, and aseptic versus septic failure. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent revision THA from 2011 to 2019. A total of 23,501 patients were identified and grouped into mortality (n = 161) and mortality-free (n = 23,340) cohorts. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and aseptic/septic failure were evaluated. RESULTS: The overall 30-day mortality was 0.69%. The mortality rate by age group (normalised per 1000 patients) was 0 (18-39 years [Y]), 0.67 (40-49 Y), 1.10 (50-59 Y), 2.58 (60-69 Y), 6.15 (70-79 Y) 19.32 (80-89 Y), and 58.22 (90+Y) (p < 0.001). The mortality rate by ASA classification (normalised per 1000 patients) was 0 (ASA I), 1.47 (ASA II), 6.94 (ASA III), 45.42 (ASA IV), and 200 (ASA V) (p < 0.001). The 30-day mortality rate for the septic and aseptic cohorts was 1.03% and 0.65%, respectively (p = 0.038). CCI scores (p < 0.001), diabetes (p < 0.001), systematic sepsis (p < 0.001), poor functional status (p < 0.001), BMI < 24.9 kg/m2 (p < 0.001), and dirty/infected wounds (p < 0.001) were all associated with increased mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: 1 in 145 patients will suffer mortality during the 30 days after revision THA. PJI-related revision THA was associated with 1.5-fold increase in 30-day mortality rate compared to its aseptic counterpart. Certain patient determinants and baseline comorbidities, as measured by ASA and CCI scores, were associated with higher 30-day mortality rates. Therefore, it is imperative to identify such risk factors and implement perioperative patient optimisation pathways to mitigate the risk among vulnerable patients.

[Budget impact analysis of the implementation of a bone tissue bank in a Chilean health service]. / Análisis de impacto presupuestario de un banco de tejido óseo en un servicio de salud de Chile.

This research aimed to analyze the costs of bone grafting through a bone tissue bank in a Chilean regional health service. Methods: First, we developed a preliminary epidemiological study to obtain the necessary data for the analysis, specifically on bone graft procedures in a local health service (Servicio Salud Concepción). Next, we performed a budget impact analysis. Results: We analyzed a total of 6,252 cc of bone grafts, with a total cost of USD$156,000 per year. We found a potential recovering capacity of 302 ± 16 femoral heads per year from the total hip replacement procedures. Based on these results, bone tissue banks could save USD$145,000 hospital costs annually. Studying a representative health service from Chile, this analysis revealed a dependency on imported bone substitutes and autografts. These requirements can be supplied sustainably by a bone tissue bank based on donations of femoral heads under the current legislation of the Chilean health authority.

Shape of the association between preoperative hemoglobin level and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing primary arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The shape of the association between preoperative hemoglobin level and outcomes after primary arthroplasty has not been adequately described. This study aimed to characterize the association between preoperative hemoglobin level and important outcomes after primary hip and knee arthroplasty and how this association is influenced by other key confounders. METHODS: Using de-identified, population-based health administrative data for Ontario housed at ICES, we identified all primary hip and knee arthroplasty procedures performed in Ontario between April 2007 and March 2017. Preoperative hemoglobin level, age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, preadmission living status, Hospital-patient One-year Mortality Risk (HOMR) score, and serum sodium and creatinine levels were extracted. All relevant postoperative outcomes that could be measured accurately were identified. We performed multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic splines analyses. RESULTS: A total of 188 176 patients clustered within 532 surgeons were studied. The adjusted likelihood of transfusion increased notably and progressively when the preoperative hemoglobin level was below 135 g/L; duration of surgery, patient age and HOMR score amplified this association. Risk of postoperative admission to critical care showed a linear association with preoperative hemoglobin level. Risks of unplanned 30-day emergency department visit, 30-day readmission and 1-year all-cause mortality showed curvilinear associations with baseline hemoglobin level, with risks being notably greater as the level deviated from 137 g/L to 141 g/L. CONCLUSION: Preoperative hemoglobin levels, both high and low, were independently significantly associated with primary arthroplasty outcomes, and levels at which outcome risks started to increase exceeded threshold values commonly used to define "normal." Preoperative hemoglobin level should be considered in future bundled payment models that aim to account for case-mix when grading postarthroplasty outcomes.