The Effect of Different Bone Marrow Stimulation Techniques on Human Talar Subchondral Bone: A Micro-Computed Tomography Evaluation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate morphological alterations, microarchitectural disturbances, and the extent of bone marrow access to the subchondral bone marrow compartment using micro-computed tomography analysis in different bone marrow stimulation (BMS) techniques. METHODS: Nine zones in a 3 × 3 grid pattern were assigned to 5 cadaveric talar dome articular surfaces. A 1.00-mm microfracture awl (s.MFX), a 2.00-mm standard microfracture awl (l.MFX), or a 1.25-mm Kirschner wire (K-wire) drill hole was used to penetrate the subchondral bone in each grid zone. Subchondral bone holes and adjacent tissue areas were assessed by micro-computed tomography to analyze adjacent bone area destruction and communicating channels to the bone marrow. Grades 1 to 3 were assigned, where 1 = minimal compression/sclerosis; 2 = moderate compression/sclerosis; 3 = severe compression/sclerosis. Bone volume/total tissue volume, bone surface area/bone volume, trabecular thickness, and trabecular number were calculated in the region of interest. RESULTS: Visual assessment revealed that the s.MFX had significantly more grade 1 holes (P < .001) and that the l.MFX had significantly more poor/grade 3 holes (P = .002). Bone marrow channel assessment showed a statistically significant increase in the number of channels in the s.MFX when compared with both K-wire and l.MFX holes (P < .001). Bone volume fraction for the s.MFX was significantly less than that of the l.MFX (P = .029). CONCLUSIONS: BMS techniques using instruments with larger diameters resulted in increased trabecular compaction and sclerosis in areas adjacent to the defect. K-wire and l.MFX techniques resulted in less open communicating bone marrow channels, denoting a reduction in bone marrow access. The results of this study indicate that BMS using larger diameter devices results in greater microarchitecture disturbances. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The current study suggests that the choice of a BMS technique should be carefully considered as the results indicate that smaller diameter hole sizes may diminish the amount of microarchitectural disturbances in the subchondral bone.

Osteochondral Fractures of the Knee in Skeletally Immature Patients: Short-Term Results of Operative Fixation using Omnitech Screws.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Retrospective case series looking at the use of Omnitech compression screws for the management of osteochondral fractures in skeletally immature patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Nine patients with a mean age of 14 were included in the study with a mean follow up of 26 months. RESULTS: The average KOOS, IKDC and Tegner Lysholm Scores were 86.7, 90.34 and 96.1 respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of Omnitech screws in the acute setting for skeletally immature patients shows excellent short-term outcomes.

Small-Diameter Awls Improve Articular Cartilage Repair After Microfracture Treatment in a Translational Animal Model.

BACKGROUND: Microfracture is the most commonly applied arthroscopic marrow stimulation procedure. HYPOTHESIS: Articular cartilage repair is improved when the subchondral bone is perforated by small-diameter microfracture awls compared with larger awls. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Standardized rectangular (4 × 8 mm) full-thickness chondral defects (N = 24) were created in the medial femoral condyle of 16 adult sheep and debrided down to the subchondral bone plate. Three treatment groups (n = 8 defects each) were tested: 6 microfracture perforations using small-diameter awls (1.0 mm; group 1), large-diameter awls (1.2 mm; group 2), or without perforations (debridement control; group 3). Osteochondral repair was assessed at 6 months in vivo using established macroscopic, histological, immunohistochemical, biochemical, and micro-computed tomography analyses. RESULTS: Compared with control defects, histological cartilage repair was always improved after both microfracture techniques (P < .023). Application of 1.0-mm microfracture awls led to a significantly improved histological overall repair tissue quality (7.02 ± 0.70 vs 9.03 ± 0.69; P = .008) and surface grading (1.05 ± 0.28 vs 2.10 ± 0.19; P = .001) compared with larger awls. The small-diameter awl decreased relative bone volume of the subarticular spongiosa (bone volume/tissue volume ratio: 23.81% ± 3.37% vs 30.58% ± 2.46%; P = .011). Subchondral bone cysts and intralesional osteophytes were frequently observed after either microfracture treatment. Macroscopic grading, DNA, proteoglycan, and type I and type II collagen contents as well as degenerative changes within the adjacent cartilage remained unaffected by the awl diameter. CONCLUSION: Small-diameter microfracture awls improve articular cartilage repair in the translational sheep model more effectively than do larger awls. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These data support the use of small microfracture instruments for the surgical treatment of cartilage defects and warrant prolonged clinical investigations.

Repair of retropatellar cartilage defects in the knee with microfracture and a cell-free polymer-based implant.

INTRODUCTION: To analyze magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3T and the clinical outcome in a short-term pilot study after treatment of retropatellar cartilage defects with microfracturing and subsequent covering with the cell-free chondrotissue(®) polyglycolic acid-hyaluronan implant. METHODS: Five consecutive patients after microfracturing and defect coverage with the chondrotissue(®) implant immersed with autologous serum were included. After a mean follow-up of 21 months (range 11-31 months), defect fill and repair tissue quality was assessed by 3-T MRI followed by applying established MRI scoring systems. The patients' situation was assessed using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and a patients' satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: Magnetic resonance imaging showed good to excellent defect fill with complete integration. The mean MOCART score was 61 (range 50-75) points. The mean Henderson score was 7 (range 6-9) points. All patients showed subchondral bone alterations. The KOOS showed good values in all sub-categories in 4 out of 5 patients and a mean overall score of 73 (range 40-90) points. Two patients rated the outcome as excellent, two as good and one as fair. All patients would have the procedure again and recommend it. CONCLUSIONS: In this small case series, the coverage of symptomatic retropatellar cartilage defects with the chondrotissue(®) implant after microfracturing was safe and feasible with improvement of the patients' situation at short-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Reviewing subchondral cartilage surgery: considerations for standardised and outcome predictable cartilage remodelling: a technical note.

PURPOSE: The potential of subchondral mesenchymal stem cell stimulation (MSS) for cartilage repair has led to the widespread use of microfracture as a first line treatment for full thickness articular cartilage defects. Recent focus on the effects of subchondral bone during cartilage injury and repair has expanded the understanding of the strengths and limitations in MSS and opened new pathways for potential improvement. Comparative studies have shown that bone marrow access has positive implications for pluripotential cell recruitment, repair quality and quantity, i.e. deeper channels elicited better cartilage fill, more hyaline cartilage character with higher type II collagen content and lower type I collagen content compared to shallow marrow access. METHODS: A subchondral needling procedure using standardised and thin subchondral perforations deep into the subarticular bone marrow making the MSS more consistent with the latest developments in subchondral cartilage remodelling is proposed. RESULTS: As this is a novel method clinical studies have been initiated to evaluate the procedure especially compared to microfracturing. However, the first case studies and follow-ups indicate that specific drills facilitate reaching the subchondral bone marrow while the needle size makes perforation of the subchondral bone easier and more predictable. Clinical results of the first group of patients seem to compare well to microfracturing. CONCLUSION: The authors suggest a new method for a standardised procedure using a new perforating device. Advances in MSS by subchondral bone marrow perforation are discussed. It remains to be determined by clinical studies how this method compares to microfracturing. The subchondral needling offers the surgeon and the investigator a method that facilitates comparison studies because of its defined depth of subchondral penetration and needle size.

A new distraction arthroplasty device using magnetic force; a cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: It is difficult for an articular cartilage injury to repair spontaneously. There are many procedures for treating cartilage injury, however there is no standard procedure for middle-aged patients who have diffuse knee osteoarthritis, especially of the lateral compartment. Therefore, Ochi developed a new distraction device that uses magnetic power to enlarge a joint space and promote cartilage regeneration with microfracture. The purpose of this study is to evaluate this new distraction arthroplasty system by using the cadaveric knee. METHODS: This study used ten knees from six cadavers that were embalmed by Thiel's methods. The medial and lateral joint space was measured by AP radiographic view before and after distraction, and after weight-bearing to evaluate the joint distraction. The contact pressure of the medial and lateral compartments at the knee extension position by using a prescale film system was measured before and after weight-bearing with a 15 or 30-kg weight-bearing load to evaluate the effectiveness of this device. FINDINGS: The lateral joint space significantly increased from the pre-distraction to the post-distraction; however, it did not change significantly between post-distraction and post-weight-bearing. With a 15 or 30-kg weight-bearing load, the contact pressure of the lateral compartment significantly decreased from the pre-distraction to the post-distraction. INTERPRETATION: The most important advantage of this device is that it maintains a continuous distraction tension and enables almost the full range of motion of the knee. We believe that joint distraction by using magnetic force can be a promising option for cartilage injury in middle-aged patients.