PRESTIGIO RING "a 59-year-old man with multidrug resistant HIV-1 infection failing a regimen including dolutegravir, rilpivirine, atazanavir/cobicistat: successful treatment tailoring based on genotypic and phenotypic resistance tests".

Management of virological failure in heavily treatment-experienced people with multidrug-resistant (MDR) HIV infection is a serious clinical challenge. New drugs with novel mechanisms of action have recently been approved, and their use has improved the outcome of subjects with limited treatment options (LTO). In this setting, the choice of antiretroviral therapy (ART) should be tailored based on the pattern of resistance, treatment history and patients' individual characteristics. While genotypic resistance testing is the reference method for analysing residual drug susceptibility, phenotypic resistance testing can provide additional support when facing LTO. Herein, we present the case of a patient with MDR HIV-1 infection on virological failure enrolled in the PRESTIGIO Registry. The salvage ART regimen, which included drugs with novel mechanisms of action (MoA), was tailored to the patient's clinical characteristics and on the resistance pattern explored with genotypic and phenotypic investigation, allowing the achievement of viro-immunological success. The use of recently approved drugs with novel MoA, combined with an optimized background regimen, may also achieve virological suppression in people with LTO.

A validated method for simultaneous quantification of four antiretrovirals in dried blood spot and plasma using LC-MS/MS: Application to efavirenz therapeutic drug monitoring in pregnant patients.

INTRODUCTION: The specific physiological background induced by pregnancy leads to significant changes in maternal pharmacokinetics, suggesting potential variability in plasma concentrations of antiretrovirals. Pregnant HIV patients exposed to subtherapeutic doses, particularly in the last trimester of the pregnancy, have higher chances to transmit the infection to their children. Therefore, the therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretrovirals in HIV pregnant patients would be of great value. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop and validate a sensitive liquid chromatograph tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for simultaneous quantification of efavirenz, raltegravir, atazanavir, and ritonavir in dried blood spots (DBS) and plasma. DESIGN AND METHODS: The analytes were extracted from the DBS punch and plasma with a mixture of methanol:zinc sulfate 200 mM (50:50, v/v) and 100 % methanol, respectively. For the chromatographic separation a Shim-pack® C18, 4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 µm column was used. Detection was performed in a 3200-QTRAP® mass spectrometer, with a run time of 6 min. RESULTS: The assay was linear in the range of 15-1,000 ng/mL for raltegravir, 50-10,000 ng/mL for both atazanavir and ritonavir, 50-5,000 ng/mL for efavirenz. Precision and accuracy at these concentrations were less than 15 % for all analytes. Raltegravir, atazanavir, and ritonavir were stable for seven days at 23 °C and 40 °C, whereas efavirenz was stable for twenty-four hours at the same conditions. CONCLUSIONS: The method was successfully applied to quantify efavirenz in DBS samples obtained from HIV-1 infected pregnant volunteers under antiretroviral therapy. The concentrations of efavirenz in DBS and plasma were comparable according to Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analysis.

Virologic outcomes on dolutegravir-, atazanavir-, or efavirenz-based ART in urban Zimbabwe: A longitudinal study.

There are few data from sub-Saharan Africa on the virological outcomes associated with second-line ART based on protease inhibitors or dolutegravir (DTG). We compared viral load (VL) suppression among people living with HIV (PLWH) on atazanavir (ATV/r)- or DTG-based second-line ART with PLWH on efavirenz (EFV)-based first-line ART. We analyzed data from the electronic medical records system of Newlands Clinic in Harare, Zimbabwe. We included individuals aged ≥12 years when commencing first-line EFV-based ART or switching to second-line DTG- or ATV/r-based ART with ≥24 weeks follow-up after start or switch. We computed suppression rates (HIV VL <50 copies/mL) at weeks 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 and estimated the probability of VL suppression by treatment regimen, time since start/switch of ART, sex, age, and CD4 cell count (at start/switch) using logistic regression in a Bayesian framework. We included 7013 VL measurements of 1049 PLWH (61% female) initiating first-line ART and 1114 PLWH (58% female) switching to second-line ART. Among those switching, 872 (78.3%) were switched to ATV/r and 242 (21.7%) to DTG. VL suppression was lower in second-line ART than first-line ART, except at week 12, when those on DTG showed higher suppression than those on EFV (aOR 2.10, 95%-credible interval [CrI] 1.48-3.00) and ATV/r-based regimens (aOR 1.87, 95%-CrI 1.32-2.71). For follow-up times exceeding 24 weeks however, first-line participants demonstrated significantly higher VL suppression than second-line, with no evidence for a difference between DTG and ATV/r. Notably, from week 48 onward, VL suppression seemed to stabilize across all regimen groups, with an estimated 89.1% (95% CrI 86.9-90.9%) VL suppression in EFV, 74.5% (95%-CrI 68.0-80.7%) in DTG, and 72.9% (95%-CrI 69.5-76.1%) in ATV/r at week 48, showing little change for longer follow-up times. Virologic monitoring and adherence support remain essential even in the DTG era to prevent second-line treatment failure in settings with limited treatment options.

Preclinical characterization of a non-peptidomimetic HIV protease inhibitor with improved metabolic stability.

Protease inhibitors (PIs) remain an important component of antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV-1 infection due to their high genetic barrier to resistance development. Nevertheless, the two most commonly prescribed HIV PIs, atazanavir and darunavir, still require co-administration with a pharmacokinetic boosting agent to maintain sufficient drug plasma levels which can lead to undesirable drug-drug interactions. Herein, we describe GS-9770, a novel investigational non-peptidomimetic HIV PI with unboosted once-daily oral dosing potential due to improvements in its metabolic stability and its pharmacokinetic properties in preclinical animal species. This compound demonstrates potent inhibitory activity and high on-target selectivity for recombinant HIV-1 protease versus other aspartic proteases tested. In cell culture, GS-9770 inhibits Gag polyprotein cleavage and shows nanomolar anti-HIV-1 potency in primary human cells permissive to HIV-1 infection and against a broad range of HIV subtypes. GS-9770 demonstrates an improved resistance profile against a panel of patient-derived HIV-1 isolates with resistance to atazanavir and darunavir. In resistance selection experiments, GS-9770 prevented the emergence of breakthrough HIV-1 variants at all fixed drug concentrations tested and required multiple protease substitutions to enable outgrowth of virus exposed to escalating concentrations of GS-9770. This compound also remained fully active against viruses resistant to drugs from other antiviral classes and showed no in vitro antagonism when combined pairwise with drugs from other antiretroviral classes. Collectively, these preclinical data identify GS-9770 as a potent, non-peptidomimetic once-daily oral HIV PI with potential to overcome the persistent requirement for pharmacological boosting with this class of antiretroviral agents.

Enhanced antifungal activity of posaconazole against Candida auris by HIV protease inhibitors, atazanavir and saquinavir.

The increasing incidence and dissemination of multidrug-resistant Candida auris represents a serious global threat. The emergence of pan-resistant C. auris exhibiting resistance to all three classes of antifungals magnifies the need for novel therapeutic interventions. We identified that two HIV protease inhibitors, atazanavir and saquinavir, in combination with posaconazole exhibited potent activity against C. auris in vitro and in vivo. Both atazanavir and saquinavir exhibited a remarkable synergistic activity with posaconazole against all tested C. auris isolates and other medically important Candida species. In a time-kill assay, both drugs restored the fungistatic activity of posaconazole, resulting in reduction of 5 and 5.6 log10, respectively. Furthermore, in contrast to the individual drugs, the two combinations effectively inhibited the biofilm formation of C. auris by 66.2 and 81.2%, respectively. Finally, the efficacy of the two combinations were tested in a mouse model of C. auris infection. The atazanavir/posaconazole and saquinavir/posaconazole combinations significantly reduced the C. auris burden in mice kidneys by 2.04- (99.1%) and 1.44-log10 (96.4%) colony forming unit, respectively. Altogether, these results suggest that the combination of posaconazole with the HIV protease inhibitors warrants further investigation as a new therapeutic regimen for the treatment of C. auris infections.

Synthetic and Clinical Perspectives of Evotaz: An Overview.

Viruses cause a variety of diseases in the human body. Antiviral agents are used to prevent the production of disease-causing viruses. These agents obstruct and kill the virus's translation and replication. Because viruses share the metabolic processes of the majority of host cells, finding targeted medicines for the virus is difficult. In the ongoing search for better antiviral agents, the USFDA approved EVOTAZ, a new drug discovered for the treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). It is a once-daily (OD) fixed-dose combination of Cobicistat, a cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme inhibitor, and Atazanavir, a protease inhibitor. The combination drug was created in such a way that it can inhibit both CYP enzymes and proteases at the same time, resulting in the virus's death. The drug is not effective in children under the age of 18; however, it is still being studied for various parameters. This review article focuses on EVOTAZ's preclinical and clinical aspects, as well as its efficacy and safety profiles.

Modern antiretroviral regimens in pregnant women: virologic outcomes and durability.

OBJECTIVES: Data are lacking on the virologic efficacy and durability of modern antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimens during pregnancy. We compared virologic outcomes at delivery among women receiving dolutegravir versus other ART and the rate of change of the initial pregnancy regimen. DESIGN: Single-site retrospective cohort between 2009 and 2019. METHODS: We used univariable and multivariable generalized estimating equations to model the relationship between the maternal ART anchor and the proportion of women with a detectable viral load (greater than or equal to 20 HIV RNA copies/mL of plasma) closest to delivery (suboptimal virologic control) and with a detectable viral load at any time in the third trimester. We also compared changes in ART during pregnancy. RESULTS: We evaluated 230 pregnancies in 173 mothers. Rates of optimal virologic control at delivery did not significantly differ in mothers who received dolutegravir (93.1%), rilpivirine (92.1%), boosted darunavir (82.6%), or efavirenz (76.9%) but were significantly lower among mothers receiving atazanavir (49.0%) or lopinavir (40.9%). The odds of having a detectable viral load at any time in the third trimester was also higher for atazanavir and lopinavir. Raltegravir, elvitegravir, or bictegravir were used in less than 10 mothers at delivery, which precluded statistical analyses. The frequency of change in ART was significantly higher in mothers who initially received elvitegravir (68%) or efavirenz (47%) than dolutegravir (18%). CONCLUSION: Dolutegravir-containing, rilpivirine-containing, and boosted darunavir-containing regimens conferred excellent virologic control in pregnancy. Atazanavir and lopinavir, elvitegravir, and efavirenz were associated with either high rates of virologic failure or regimen change during pregnancy.

Biterapia con atazanavir/ritonavir más raltegravir versus terapia triple en segunda línea: Ensayo ARTE / ATV/r+RAL (DT) after failure with NNRTI

Antecedentes: La terapia dual ha surgido como un nuevo concepto para el tratamiento del VIH. Este estudio tenía como objetivo comparar un régimen dual basado en ATV/r + RAL (TD) frente a estándar de tres drogas con ATV/r + TDF/FTC (TT) luego del fracaso de un primer esquema ba-sado en INNTR.ClinicalTrials.gov, Número: NCT01829802.Método: Estudio piloto abierto, multicéntrico y aleatoriza-do. Resultado primario: proporción de sujetos con ARN del VIH-1 menor a 50 copias/mL en semana 48 (S48). Resulta-dos secundarios: discontinuaciones asociadas a eventos adversos (EA), tiempo transcurrido hasta la supresión viral, desarrollo de mutaciones de resistencia a la integrasa y proteasa, cambio en recuento de CD4. Resultados: De los 57 participantes seleccionados, 34 fue-ron asignados aleatoriamente para recibir: TD (n: 18) o TT (n: 16). En semana 48, 67% (n: 12/18) en TD tuvo respues-ta virológica y 88% (n: 14/16) en rama según el análisis FDA, intención de tratamiento/expuestos (p = NS) y 73% (TD) y 93% (TT) según análisis por protocolo (p = NS). El cambio de CD4 entre basal - S48: +119 y +52 células/µL en DT y TT, respectivamente. Cuatro participantes en TD y uno en TT presentaron fracaso virológico en la semana 48. Un participante desarrolló una mutación de resistencia a integrasa (155H).Conclusión: ATV/r+RAL como terapia dual de segunda línea mostró una tendencia al fracaso virológico más frecuente, en comparación con TT, aunque el estudio piloto no tenía potencia para demostrar esta diferencia. Este estudio está registrado en ClinicalTrials.gov, Número: NCT01829802

Background: Dual therapy has emerged as a novel concept for HIV treatment. This study was aimed at comparing a nucleoside-sparing dual regimen consisting of ATV/r + RAL (DT) vs standard therapy of ATV/r + TDF/FTC (TT) among individuals failing first NNRTI-containing treatment.Methods: Randomized multicenter open-label pilot study. Primary outcome: proportion of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA below the limit of detection (<50 copies/mL) at 48 weeks (W48). Secondary outcomes: proportion of discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs), time until viral suppression, time until loss of virological response, development of integrase resistance mutations, and absolute change in CD4 counts. The primary outcome was analyzed using the FDA snapshot analysis.Results: Out of 57 participants screened, 34 were randomized to receive: DT (n: 18) or TT (n: 16). At W48, virological response was achieved in 67% (n: 12/18) of participants receiving DT and 88% (n: 14/16) receiving TT by FDA snapshot analysis (p = NS) and 73% and 93% by per-protocol analysis (p = NS). CD4 cell count median change from baseline to W48 was +119 and + 52 cell/µL in DT and TT, respectively. Four participants receiving DT and one TT presented virological failure at W48, with low pVL. One participant developed an integrase resistance mutation (155H) and suppressed later on TT.Conclusion: ATV/r+RAL as second-line therapy showed a trend to more frequent virological failure, compared to TT, although the study was unpowered to prove this difference. No major differences were seen in tolerance or toxicity.This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT01829802

First Pharmacokinetic Data of Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate and Tenofovir With Dolutegravir or Boosted Protease Inhibitors in African Children: A Substudy of the CHAPAS-4 Trial.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) and tenofovir in a subset of African children enrolled in the CHAPAS-4 trial. METHODS: Children aged 3-15 years with human immunodeficiency virus infection failing first-line antiretroviral therapy were randomized to emtricitabine/TAF versus standard-of-care nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor combination, plus dolutegravir, atazanavir/ritonavir, darunavir/ritonavir, or lopinavir/ritonavir. Daily emtricitabine/TAF was dosed according to World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended weight bands: 120/15 mg in children weighing 14 to <25 kg and 200/25 mg in those weighing ≥25 kg. At steady state, 8-9 blood samples were taken to construct pharmacokinetic curves. Geometric mean (GM) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) were calculated for TAF and tenofovir and compared to reference exposures in adults. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic results from 104 children taking TAF were analyzed. GM (coefficient of variation [CV%]) TAF AUClast when combined with dolutegravir (n = 18), darunavir/ritonavir (n = 34), or lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 20) were 284.5 (79), 232.0 (61), and 210.2 (98) ng*hour/mL, respectively, and were comparable to adult reference values. When combined with atazanavir/ritonavir (n = 32), TAF AUClast increased to 511.4 (68) ng*hour/mL. For each combination, tenofovir GM (CV%) AUCtau and Cmax remained below reference values in adults taking 25 mg TAF with a boosted protease inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: In children, TAF combined with boosted PIs or dolutegravir and dosed according to WHO-recommended weight bands provides TAF and tenofovir concentrations previously demonstrated to be well tolerated and effective in adults. These data provide the first evidence for use of these combinations in African children. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ISRCTN22964075.

Effects of pitavastatin on atherosclerotic-associated inflammatory biomarkers in people living with HIV with dyslipidemia and receiving ritonavir-boosted atazanavir: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammation has been described in people living with HIV (PLHIV) receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) despite viral suppression. Inflammation associated non-communicable diseases, including atherosclerosis, are becoming recognized complication of HIV infection. We studied the effect of pitavastatin on atherosclerotic-associated inflammatory biomarkers in PLHIV receiving ART. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, crossover study was conducted in HIV-infected persons with dyslipidemia and receiving atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) to evaluate the effect of 2 mg/day pitavastatin treatment versus placebo. High-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP), cytokines, and cellular markers in PLHIV receiving 12 weeks of pitavastatin or placebo were investigated. RESULTS: A total of 24 HIV-infected individuals with a median (interquartile range) age of 46 (41-54) years were recruited, and the median CD4 T cell count was 662 (559-827) cells/mm3. The median duration of ATV/r use was 36 (24-48) months. Significant change in levels of basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF) between pitavastatin treatment and placebo at week 12 from baseline was observed (27.1 vs. 20.5 pg/mL; p=0.023). However, there were no significant changes from baseline of hs-CRP and other plasma cytokine levels at week 12 of pitavastatin or placebo. Regarding cellular markers, percentages of HLA-DR+CD38-CD4+ T cells and PD1+CD4+ T cells significantly decreased from baseline in PLHIV receiving pitavastatin for 12 weeks, as compared to placebo (- 0.27 vs. 0.02%; p=0.049 and - 0.23 vs. 0.23%; p=0.022, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Pitavastatin treatment increases basic FGF levels, and lowers HLA-DR+CD38-CD4+ T cells, and PD1+CD4+ T cells. Further study on the effects of pitavastatin on preventing cardiovascular diseases in PLHIV should be pursued.

Antiretroviral protease inhibitors induce features of cellular senescence that are reversible upon drug removal.

Antiretroviral drugs have dramatically improved the prognosis of HIV-infected patients, with strikingly reduced morbidity and mortality. However, long-term use can be associated with signs of premature aging. Highly active antiretroviral therapy generally comprises two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), with one of three additional antiretroviral drug classes, including protease inhibitors (PIs). One commonality between mitochondrial dysfunction (induced by NRTIs) and defects in lamin A (induced by PIs) is they can cause or accelerate cellular senescence, a state of essentially irreversible growth arrest, and the secretion of many bioactive molecules collectively known as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). We hypothesized that senescent cells increase following treatment with certain HIV therapies. We compared the effects of two distinct HIV PIs: ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) and ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRN/r), used in combination treatments for HIV infection. Upon ATV/r, but not DRN/r, treatment, cells arrested growth, displayed multiple features of senescence, and expressed significantly upregulated levels of many SASP factors. Furthermore, mice receiving sustained ATV/r treatment showed an increase in senescent cells and age-related decline in physiological function. However, removing treatment reversed the features of senescence observed in vivo and cell culture. Given how these features disappeared with drug removal, certain features of senescence may not be prognostic as defined by an irreversible growth arrest. Importantly, for patients that are treated or have been treated with ATV/r, our data suggest that switching to another PI that does not promote premature aging conditions (DRN/r) may improve the associated age-related complications.

Uso de Ivermectina e Atazanavir no tratamento da Covid-19: uma revisão de escopo / Use of Ivermectin and Atazanavir in the treatment of Covid-19: a scoping review / Uso de Ivermectina y Atazanavir en el tratamiento de Covid-19: una revisión de alcance

Objetivo: Examinar e mapear as evidências científicas sobre a eficácia do uso de ivermectina e atazanavir no tratamento de COVID-19. Metodologia: Scoping Review, baseado nos procedimentos recomendados pelo Instituto Joanna Briggs. Estabeleceu-se a pergunta norteadora: "Quais são as evidências científicas sobre o uso de ivermectina e atazanavir no tratamento de pacientes com sintomas leves de COVID-19?". Foram realizadas buscas em seis bases de dados nacionais e internacionais, sobre trabalhos publicados até dezembro de 2022. Dos 357 estudos encontrados, 22 foram selecionados para leitura na íntegra, resultando em uma amostra final de 11 estudos analisados. Resultados: As 11 publicações analisadas foram publicadas de 2020 a 2022 durante período pandêmico, de âmbito nacional e internacional com delineamento de estudos experimentais, do tipo ensaio clínico com randomização. Apenas 03 estudos (25%) testaram o atazanavir como intervenção conjugada a outras drogas, não evidenciando melhorias significativas em relação ao seu uso. Já no tratamento com Ivermectina, dos oito (75%) estudos que a testaram, apenas três (37,5%) recomendaram seu uso e cinco (62,5%) não suportam seu uso para tratamento de COVID-19 leve. O tempo de resolução dos sintomas variou de 8 a 10 dias nos braços tratados com ivermectina e em média 07 dias no tratamento com atazanavir. Não se detectou eventos adversos graves relacionados ao uso das duas drogas. Conclusão: As evidências que recomendavam o uso de ivermectina datam do início do período pandêmico, 2020, mas posteriormente, com a realização de ensaios clínicos robustos e controlados, novas evidências não suportam o uso de ivermectina e atazanavir no tratamento de COVID-19 leve mostrando que não houve diferença no tempo de resolução dos sintomas, na taxa de mortalidade, taxa de internação na UTI e tempo de hospitalização.

Objective: To examine and map the scientific evidence on the effectiveness of using ivermectin and atazanavir in the treatment of COVID-19. Methodology: Scoping Review, based on the procedures recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The guiding question was established, "What is the scientific evidence on the use of ivermectin and atazanavir in the treatment of patients with mild symptoms of COVID-19?" Searches were conducted in six national and international databases on papers published until December 2022. Of the 357 studies found, 22 were selected for reading in full, resulting in a final sample of 11 studies analyzed. Results: The 11 publications analyzed were published from 2020 to 2022 during pandemic period, of national and international scope with experimental study design, of clinical trial type with randomization. Only 03 studies (25%) tested atazanavir as a combined intervention with other drugs, showing no significant improvements in relation to its use. As for the treatment with Ivermectin, of the eight (75%) studies that tested it, only three (37.5%) recommended its use and five (62.5%) did not support its use for treating mild COVID-19. The time to symptom resolution ranged from 8 to 10 days in the ivermectin-treated arms and on average 07 days in the atazanavir treatment. No serious adverse events related to the use of the two drugs were detected. Conclusion: evidence recommending the use of ivermectin dates back to the beginning of the pandemic period, 2020, but subsequently, with robust controlled clinical trials, new evidence does not support the use of ivermectin and atazanavir in the treatment of mild COVID-19 showing that there was no difference in time to symptom resolution, mortality rate, ICU admission rate, and length of hospital stay.

Objetivo: Examinar y mapear la evidencia científica sobre la eficacia del uso de ivermectina y atazanavir en el tratamiento de COVID-19. Metodología: Scoping Review, basada en los procedimientos recomendados por el Instituto Joanna Briggs. La pregunta guía era: "¿Cuál es la evidencia científica sobre el uso de ivermectina y atazanavir en el tratamiento de pacientes con síntomas leves de COVID-19? Se realizaron búsquedas en seis bases de datos nacionales e internacionales, en artículos publicados hasta diciembre de 2022. De los 357 estudios encontrados, se seleccionaron 22 para su lectura completa, lo que dio lugar a una muestra final de 11 estudios analizados. Resultados: Las 11 publicaciones analizadas fueron publicadas entre 2020 y 2022 durante el periodo pandémico, de ámbito nacional e internacional con diseño de estudio experimental, de tipo ensayo clínico con aleatorización. Apenas 03 estudios (25%) probaron el atazanavir como intervención combinada con otras drogas, sin evidenciar mejoras significativas en relación con su uso. En cuanto al tratamiento con Ivermectina, de los ocho (75%) estudios que la probaron, sólo tres (37,5%) recomendaron su uso y cinco (62,5%) no apoyaron su uso para tratar la COVID-19 leve. El tiempo transcurrido hasta la resolución de los síntomas osciló entre 8 y 10 días en los brazos tratados con ivermectina y una media de 07 días en el tratamiento con atazanavir. No se detectaron acontecimientos adversos graves relacionados con el uso de los dos fármacos. Conclusión: las pruebas que recomiendan el uso de ivermectina se remontan al inicio del periodo pandémico, 2020, pero posteriormente, con ensayos clínicos controlados sólidos, las nuevas pruebas no apoyan el uso de ivermectina y atazanavir en el tratamiento de la COVID-19 leve, lo que demuestra que no hubo diferencias en el tiempo hasta la resolución de los síntomas, la tasa de mortalidad, la tasa de ingreso en la UCI y la duración de la estancia hospitalaria.

Dolutegravir in Pregnancy as Compared with Current HIV Regimens in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Data on the effectiveness and safety of dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection in pregnancy as compared with other ART regimens commonly used in the United States and Europe, particularly when initiated before conception, are limited. METHODS: We conducted a study involving pregnancies in persons with HIV-1 infection in the Pediatric HIV/AIDS Cohort Study whose initial ART in pregnancy included dolutegravir, atazanavir-ritonavir, darunavir-ritonavir, oral rilpivirine, raltegravir, or elvitegravir-cobicistat. Viral suppression at delivery and the risks of infants being born preterm, having low birth weight, and being small for gestational age were compared between each non-dolutegravir-based ART regimen and dolutegravir-based ART. Supplementary analyses that included participants in the Swiss Mother and Child HIV Cohort Study were conducted to improve the precision of our results. RESULTS: Of the pregnancies in the study, 120 were in participants who received dolutegravir, 464 in those who received atazanavir-ritonavir, 185 in those who received darunavir-ritonavir, 243 in those who received rilpivirine, 86 in those who received raltegravir, and 159 in those who received elvitegravir-cobicistat. The median age at conception was 29 years; 51% of the pregnancies were in participants who started ART before conception. Viral suppression was present at delivery in 96.7% of the pregnancies in participants who received dolutegravir; corresponding percentages were 84.0% for atazanavir-ritonavir, 89.2% for raltegravir, and 89.8% for elvitegravir-cobicistat (adjusted risk differences vs. dolutegravir, -13.0 percentage points [95% confidence interval {CI}, -17.0 to -6.1], -17.0 percentage points [95% CI, -27.0 to -2.4], and -7.0 percentage points [95% CI, -13.3 to -0.0], respectively). The observed risks of preterm birth were 13.6 to 17.6%. Adjusted risks of infants being born preterm, having low birth weight, or being small for gestational age did not differ substantially between non-dolutegravir-based ART and dolutegravir. Results of supplementary analyses were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Atazanavir-ritonavir and raltegravir were associated with less frequent viral suppression at delivery than dolutegravir. No clear differences in adverse birth outcomes were observed with dolutegravir-based ART as compared with non-dolutegravir-based ART, although samples were small. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and others.).

Atazanavir-Concentrate Loaded Soft Gelatin Capsule for Enhanced Concentration in Plasma, Brain, Spleen, and Lymphatics.

This study investigates the development of atazanavir-concentrate loaded soft gelatin capsule for achieving enhanced atazanavir (ATV) concentration in plasma, brain, spleen, and lymphatics beneficial in the significant reduction of viral load in HIV infection. For this purpose, ATV-concentrate in the presence and absence of Soluplus with corn oil, oleic acid, tween 80, and propylene glycol was developed. The developed ATV-concentrate was found to have enhanced dispersibility with no signs of precipitation after dilution with simulated G.I fluid as evident from particle size (16.49±0.32 nm) and PDI (0.217±0.02) analysis. The rheological and molecular docking studies explainedthe reduction of viscosity of SuATV-C due to the intermolecular H-bond between ATV and Soluplus that helps to retard crystallization. The shell of the soft gelatin capsule retains its integrity when subjected to a folding endurance test on a texture analyzer depicting that the concentrate did not affect the integrity of the soft gelatin capsule shell. An ex vivo and in vivo pharmacokinetic study in rats revealed that the SuATV-C soft gelatin capsule (SuATV-C SGC) indicated 2.9 fold improvement in rate and extent of permeation and absorption than that of ATV-suspension. The tissue distribution study also exhibited higher drug concentration in the brain (2.5 fold), lymph nodes (2.7 fold), and spleen (1.2 fold) administered with SuATV-C SGC, revealing the overwhelming influence of Soluplus and corn oil. In a nutshell, these studies demonstrated that SuATV-C SGC seems to have the potential to deliver an anti-retroviral drug to the viral sanctuaries for the better management of HIV.

Durability of switched therapy after failure of WHO-recommended antiretroviral therapy regimens in a resource-limited setting.

OBJECTIVE: The study investigated the durability of switched therapy and factors associated with the viral rebound among patients on second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Uganda. DESIGN: A retrospective dynamic cohort of adults initiated on second-line ART after virological failure to first-line ART. METHODS: Patients on second-line treatment for at least 6 months between 2007 and 2017 were included. Patients were followed, until they experienced a viral rebound (viral load ≥200 copies/ml). Cumulative probability of viral rebounds and factors associated with viral rebound were determined using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: One thousand, one hundred and one participants were enrolled of which 64% were women, the median age was 37 years [interquartile range (IQR) 31-43]. The preswitch median CD4 + cell count and viral load were 128 cells/µl (IQR 58-244) and 45 978 copies/ml (IQR 13 827-139 583), respectively. During the 4190.37 person-years, the incidence rate of viral rebound was 83.29 [95% confidence interval (CI) 74.99-92.49] per 1000 person-years. The probability of viral rebound at 5 and 10 years was 0.29 (95% CI 0.26-0.32) and 0.62 (95% CI 0.55-0.69), respectively. The median rebound-free survival was 8.7 years. Young adults (18-24 years) [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.49, 95% CI 1.32-4.67], preswitch viral load at least 100 000 copies/ml (aHR 1.53, 95% CI 1.22-1.92), and atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r)-based second-line (aHR 1.73, 95% CI 1.29-2.32) were associated with an increased risk of viral rebound. CONCLUSION: Switched therapies are durable for 8 years after failure of recommended regimens. A high preswitch viral load, ATV/r-based regimens, and young adulthood are risk factors for viral rebound, which underscores the need for more durable regimens and differentiated care services.

Simplification from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus lamivudine or emtricitabine plus ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus lamivudine in virologically suppressed HIV-infected adults with osteopenia: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, particularly when given with a ritonavir-boosted PI, reduces bone mineral density (BMD) and increases bone turnover markers (BTMs). Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus lamivudine is a feasible simplified option. We evaluated whether switching from a triple ritonavir-boosted PI plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to a two-drug regimen of lamivudine plus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir would improve BMD. METHODS: Single-arm pilot study. Virologically suppressed patients on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus lamivudine or emtricitabine plus ritonavir-boosted PI with low BMD, without previous resistance mutations and/or virological failure to study drugs were switched to 100/300 mg of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus 300 mg of lamivudine once daily. The primary endpoint was BMD change by DXA at Week 48. RESULTS: There were 31 patients, 4 (13%) female, and median age was 40 years. Seven participants (22.5%) had osteoporosis. At 48 weeks, mean (SD) changes in spine and hip BMD were +0.01 (0.03) (P = 0.0239) and +0.013 (0.03) g/cm2 (P = 0.0046), respectively. Mean (SD) T-score changes were +0.1 (0.23) (P = 0.0089) and +0.25 (0.76) (P = 0.0197), respectively. N-telopeptide and urine tenofovir disoproxil fumarate toxicity markers showed significant improvements. One participant withdrew from the study and two were lost to follow-up. There were no virological failures, or serious or grade 3-4 adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus ritonavir-boosted PI triple therapy to a lamivudine plus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir two-drug regimen in virologically suppressed HIV-infected adults with low BMD was safe, increased low BMD and reduced plasma markers of bone turnover and urine markers of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate toxicity over 48 weeks.

In silico evaluation of atazanavir as a potential HIV main protease inhibitor and its comparison with new designed analogs.

Starting three decades ago and spreading rapidly around the world, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) is an infectious disease distinct from other contagious diseases by its unique ways of transmission. Over the past few decades, research into new drug compounds has been accompanied by extensive advances, and the design and manufacture of drugs that inhibit virus enzymes is one way to combat the AIDS virus. Since blocking enzyme activity can kill a pathogen or correct a metabolic imbalance, the design and use of enzyme inhibitors is a new approach against viruses. We carried out an in-depth analysis of the efficacy of atazanavir and its newly designed analogs as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors using molecular docking. The best-designed analogs were then compared with atazanavir by the molecular dynamics simulation. The most promising results were ultimately found based on the docking analysis for HIV protease. Several exhibited an estimated free binding energy lower than -9.45 kcal/mol, indicating better prediction results than the atazanavir. ATV7 inhibitor with antiviral action may be more beneficial for infected patients with HIV. Molecular dynamics analysis and binding energy also showed that the ATV7 drug had more inhibitory ability than the atazanavir drug.

Prevalence and predictors of glucose metabolism disorders among People Living with HIV on combination antiretroviral therapy.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated prevalence and predictors of glucose metabolism disorders (GMDs) among People Living with HIV (PLWH) on efavirenz- and atazanavir/ritonavir-based combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved adult PLWH on efavirenz- (n = 240) and atazanavir/ritonavir-based (n = 111) cART. The prevalence of GMDs was determined by fasting serum glucose, insulin, and homeostasis model assessment. A logistic regression model was used to determine predictors. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of GMDs for all regimens was 27.6% (97/351) [95% CI 23.0-32.6%] s, with 31.1% (75/240) [95% CI 25.4-37.5%] for efavirenz-based and 19.8% (22/111) [95% CI 12.9-28.5%)] for atazanavir/ritonavir-based cART group. The prevalence of impaired fasting glycemia was significantly higher (p = 0.026) in the efavirenz- [(15.4%) (37/240); 95%CI (11.1-20.6%)] than atazanavir/ritonavir-based [(7.2%) (8/111), (95%CI (3.2-13.7%)] cART. However, no significant difference was observed in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance between the two regimens. Age ≥46 years old and specific type of ARV contained in cART, such as TDF, were independent predictors of GMD in both groups. Whereas the male gender and BMI category were predictors of GMDs among EFV-based cART group, AZT- and ABC- containing regimens and triglyceride levels were predictors in the ATV/r-based group. CONCLUSIONS: GMDs were highly prevalent among adults on EFV- than ATV/r-based cARTs. Age ≥46 years and TDF-containing cARTs are common predictors in both regimens. Close monitoring for impaired fasting glucose during long-term EFV-based cART is recommended for early diagnosis of type-2 diabetes and management.

Comparing Outcomes of Two Antiviral Therapy Combinations among COVID-19 Patients.

Several therapeutic regimens for COVID-19 have been studied, such as combination antiviral therapies. We aimed to compare outcome of two types of combination therapies atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) or lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) plus hydroxychloroquine among COVID-19 patients. 108 patients with moderate and severe forms of COVID-19 were divided into two groups (each group 54 patients). One group received ATV/r plus hydroxychloroquine, and the other group received hydroxychloroquine plus LPV/r. Then, both groups were evaluated and compared for clinical symptoms, recovery rates, and complications of treatment regimens. Our findings showed a significant increase in bilirubin in ATV/r-receiving group compared to LPV/r receivers. There was also a significant increase in arrhythmias in the LPV/r group compared to the ATV/r group during treatment. Other findings including length of hospital stay, outcome, and treatment complications were not statistically significant. There is no significant difference between protease inhibitor drugs including ATV/r and LPV/r in the treatment of COVID-19 regarding clinical outcomes. However, some side effects such as hyperbilirubinemia and arrhythmia were significantly different by application of atazanavir or lopinavir.