Cost analysis and safety comparison of Cisatracurium and Atracurium in patients undergoing general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NMB) differ in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. An anesthesiologist according to these similarities and differences is able to choose the least costly one if the same safety profile and same clinical benefit achieved with the different alternatives. AIM: The main objective of this study is to evaluate the economic and adverse drug reactions prevalence and differences between cisatracurium and atracurium the two non-depolarizing NMB drugs, which are widely used in adult patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia in a teaching Hospital in Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cost analysis and adverse drug reactions (ADR) monitoring were performed. Only direct costs were considered and data were collected through a prospective randomized study. Regardless of the type of surgery, 100 patients were randomly divided into two equal groups to receive either cisatracurium or atracurium by anesthesiologists. ADRs prevalence and cost differences between patients receiving one of the two non-depolarizing NMB agents were evaluated by independent sample t-test and Chi-square test respectively. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed between the two groups of patients in demographic data. There was no statistical difference in the ADR prevalence in both groups. The numbers of ADR within atracurium group was higher than cisatracurium group, but this distinction was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). It was significant difference in cost between the two neuromuscular blocking drugs (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: According to our study it seems that atracurium and cisatracurium had similar safety profile and atracurium had a cost benefit relative to cisatracurium in initial loading doses. In patients with instability in hemodynamic parameters the cisatracurium was the appropriate choice.  

Comparative cost-analysis of a propofol-cisatracurium-based anesthesia with remifentanil or fentanyl for laparoscopic surgery.

To compare the intraoperative costs of intravenous propofol-based anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a total of 42 patients were randomly assigned to receive remifentanil or fentanyl as adjuvant using the bispectral index anesthesia monitoring. The average anesthesia calculated costs per hour (and per minute) were 79.45 (1.32) in the fentanyl group and 65.36 (1.09) in the remifentanil group. The calculated mean cost per patient was 76.56 in the fentanyl group and 58.86 in the remifentanil group. In conclusion, for propofol-cisatracurium-based anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery, when applying the bispectral index to guide the administration of hypnotic anesthetic drugs and ensure an adequate and stable depth of anesthesia, the cost of anesthesia is lower using remifentanil as an adjuvant rather than fentanyl. The clinical relevance is that it could be the intravenous anesthesia technique of choice in laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy from a cost-minimization standpoint.

Drug use inefficiency: a hidden source of wasted health care dollars.

UNLABELLED: A potential area for departmental savings is to minimize inefficient use of pharmaceuticals. We recorded drug waste data for multiple drugs for a fiscal year and surveyed providers' knowledge of departmental drug waste. Six large-cost or large-volume use drugs were chosen for study: thiopental, succinylcholine, rocuronium, atracurium, midazolam, and propofol. Amounts administered to patients were collected for one year by using a computerized anesthesia record keeper. Total drug distributed was the number of vials restocked by pharmacy for the year. An efficiency index, the percent administered to patients, was calculated for each drug. Drug administration to 25,481 patients was analyzed. Drug use efficiency indices were: atracurium 29%; thiopental, 31%; succinylcholine, 33%; propofol, 49%; midazolam, 53%; rocuronium, 61%. The total cost of unadministered study drugs was $165,667, 26% of the expenditure for all drugs. Most dollars wasted were for propofol, $80,863, and thiopental, $32,839. The reason most cited for drug waste was the disposal of full, or partially full, syringes. Drug wastage represents a significant portion of the entire anesthesia drug budget. Waste reduction strategies should allow a portion of the "avoidable" waste to be reduced. IMPLICATIONS: Unadministered drug amounts were measured for six study drugs over one fiscal year and found to be significant; the cost of unadministered drugs totaled $165,667. The reason most cited for waste was disposal of full, or partially full, syringes.

Economic aspects of different muscle relaxant regimens.

OBJECTIVE: At a time of cost reduction in medical care efforts to manage the ever-increasing costs of new pharmaceutical drugs become increasingly important. Costs of four different muscle relaxant regimens including the new intermediate-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBD) cisatracurium and rocuronium will be analyzed. METHODS: Eighty patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were prospectively studied. All patients received standardized general anaesthesia with desflurane/fentanyl. Muscle relaxation was achieved with atracurium, cisatracurium, vecuronium, or rocuronium with 20 patients in each group. Intraoperatively muscle relaxants were added to maintain two twitches of the train-of-four (TOF) assessment. RESULTS: There were no differences among the four groups regarding biometric data, duration of surgery and anesthesia, number of patients with reversal of neuromuscular blockade, and time of extubation. Length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and the incidence of side effects were similar in all groups. Total costs of used drugs were significantly lowest in the atracurium-treated patients (per patient: 18.27 Euro) and significantly highest in the cisatracurium group (26.71 Euro) compared with the other groups (vecuronium: 22.61 Euro; rocuronium: 22.63 Euro). CONCLUSION: It is summarized that the use of cisatracurium was associated with higher costs compared to a standard muscle relaxant regimen using atracurium, whereas patient outcome was the same in all study groups. The routine use of the newer NMBDs can only be justified economically, if considerable improvements to clinical practice can be demonstrated.

A two-center study evaluating the hemodynamic and pharmacodynamic effects of cisatracurium and vecuronium in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the hemodynamic and pharmacodynamic effects of rapid bolus administration of cisatracurium compared with vecuronium. DESIGN: A randomized, prospective, double-blind study. SETTING: Tertiary-care university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-nine adult patients with diagnosed coronary artery disease (CAD). INTERVENTION: Elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were randomly divided into four groups. Patients received a rapid bolus of two or four times the 95% peak depression of twitch (ED95) of either cisatracurium (groups 1 and 2) or vecuronium (groups 3 and 4). Three minutes after a midazolam induction, all patients received a rapid bolus administration of either study drug. Maintenance of anesthesia was with a standardized propofol-sufentanil-oxygen anesthetic. Patients were monitored with radial and pulmonary artery catheters and electromyography. End points of the study were hemodynamic stability at induction, after bolus administration of study drugs, and after intubation; the quality of intubating conditions; drug interventions to correct hemodynamic instability; the onset, duration, and recovery of neuromuscular function; and drug cost. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) decreased in a similar proportion in all four groups after induction while, following study drug administration, MAP and HR did not change significantly. Both cisatracurium groups required more boluses to maintain neuromuscular block, but spontaneous recovery rates were faster. Both agents, but cisatracurium to a lesser degree, showed increased duration with repeated maintenance doses. Both agents afforded good to excellent intubating conditions, but the cost of cisatracurium was significantly less. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude there is no evidence of a hemodynamic difference between the two neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs). There are some clinical and cost advantages in favor of cisatracurium.

The impact of price labeling of muscle relaxants on cost consciousness among anesthesiologists.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether placing price labels on the vial caps of muscle relaxants increases cost consciousness among anesthesiologists. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University hospital departments of anesthesia and pharmacy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We placed price labels on the vial caps of all muscle relaxants for a study period of 1 year. At the beginning of the investigation, we informed the anesthesiologists of the study, discussed the prices for different muscle relaxants, and encouraged utilizing less expensive muscle relaxants whenever possible without compromising patient care. The price labels on the vial caps served as visual reminders of the various costs of muscle relaxants during daily practice. We compared the total amount spent on each muscle relaxant during the period from October 1993 to September 1994 with the period from October 1994 to September 1995. The total number of surgical cases from October 1993 to September 1994 and from October 1994 to September 1995 was unchanged and equaled 20,389 and 20,358 cases, respectively. Expenditures for pancuronium increased 104.1%. Total expenditure decreased by 12.5%, with a net savings of $47,111. CONCLUSION: Expenditures for the less costly pancuronium increased while expenditures for vecuronium and atracurium decreased. Price labeling of muscle relaxants in conjunction with education reduces total pharmacy expenditure on muscle relaxants.

The impact of choice of muscle relaxant on postoperative recovery time: a retrospective study.

UNLABELLED: To test the hypothesis that the use of long-acting muscle relaxants is associated with prolonged postoperative recovery when compared with the use of shorter-acting relaxants, we undertook a retrospective study of 270 patients with induced paralysis recovering from general anesthesia. We calculated the mean recovery time associated with each muscle relaxant used. Regression analyses were performed to control for potential confounding of the results by length and type of surgery, as well as age and sex. Taking these into account, the adjusted difference in mean recovery time between patients receiving short- and intermediate-acting relaxants (mivacurium, atracurium, and vecuronium) versus those receiving long-acting relaxants (d-tubocurarine, pancuronium, and pancuronium and d-tubocurarine combination) was 30 min (95% confidence interval [CI] 8-53). The adjusted difference in mean recovery time between patients receiving vecuronium and those receiving pancuronium (i.e., the single most frequently used drug in each category) was 33 min (95% CI 1-66). Shortened recovery time accounted for an estimated average $37.95 decrease in recovery room charge per patient when vecuronium was used instead of pancuronium, versus a $22.84 increase in drug cost. Our data and analyses support the hypothesis that the use of long-acting muscle relaxants is associated with prolonged recovery after surgery and provide preliminary evidence that restricting the use of the more expensive, shorter-acting muscle relaxants may represent a false economy. IMPLICATIONS: In this retrospective study, the use of old-fashioned, inexpensive, long-acting paralyzing drugs was found to be associated with prolonged postoperative recovery. This has implications when deciding whether, as an economic measure, to restrict the use of the more expensive, shorter-acting paralyzing drugs, because prolonged recovery also has a price.

A pharmacoeconomic analysis of neuromuscular blocking agents in the operating room.

A cost-minimization analysis was performed to compare the direct costs of various neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in procedures of specific durations. Secondary objectives were to review the role of the NMBAs studied with respect to their place on our hospital formulary, and to develop a pharmacoeconomic methodology to be applied to other formulary decisions. Patients were stratified according to estimated length of surgical procedure; group 1 (55 patients) included surgeries estimated to take less than 2 hours, and group 2 (55 patients) included those estimated to be 2-4 hours long. Patients were then randomized to one of three intermediate-acting NMBAs: atracurium, vecuronium, or rocuronium. Anesthesia records were used to obtain all anesthetic agents administered in the operating room, and drug costs were calculated from hospital drug acquisition costs as of December 1994. Postanesthesia care unit (PACU) costs were estimated from patient charges and converted to costs using our hospital's cost-to-charge ratio. Costs that were common to all study treatments or unrelated to the use of NMBAs were excluded from the analysis. Two time-adjusted costs were calculated to determine the cost of neuromuscular blockade/hour and the total anesthesia drug costs/hour. In group 1 there were no statistical differences in NMBA cost/hour, anesthesia cost/hour, or PACU times or costs. In group 2, a significant difference was found in NMBA cost/case between atracurium ($54.23 +/- 41.26, mean +/- SD) and vecuronium ($31.95 +/- 15.33, p = 0.046). Atracurium was also significantly more costly than either vecuronium or recuronium/hour ($21.95 +/- 7.42 vs $14.39 +/- 7.02 and $16.07 +/- 8.15, respectively, p = 0.011) and anesthesia cost/hour ($28.77 +/- 7.43 vs $ 22.82 +/- 7.46 and $23.32 +/- 6.54, respectively, p = 0.03). There were no differences in PACU times or costs. Based on these results, vecuronium or rocuronium is preferred over atracurium in procedures with an estimated duration of 2-4 hours. In the patient population evaluated, there were no significant cost differences among the three NMBAs in surgeries with an estimated duration of less than 2 hours.

Price stickers do not alter drug usage.

Anaesthetists choose daily among wide varieties of neuromuscular blocking drugs and rapidly acting hypnotic agents. This study sought to determine whether definitive, immediate knowledge of drug cost might influence clinician choices, ultimately reducing the cost of anaesthesia care. Faculty anaesthetists, residents in training, and nurse anaesthetists served as subjects in this prospective, sequential, blinded study of prescribing habits. Weekly inventories of selected neuromuscular blocking and rapidly acting hypnotic agents were performed over 24 wk at a tertiary-care hospital. Supermarket style price stickers plainly indicating the hospital cost of each unit of drug appeared continually for 13 wk following an initial 11 wk control period. Both actual usage data in priced units as well as data normalized by total anaesthesia duration underwent comparison between control and priced periods. The usage of pancuronium, vecuronium, atracurium, mivacurium, succinylcholine, thiopentone, etomidate, and propofol did not differ in the control from the priced periods. Pipecuronium decreased after sticker placement (2 vs 1 vials.wk-1 median, P < 0.05), as did methohexitone (39 +/- 9.0 [SD] vs 29 +/- 11 syringes.wk-1, P < 0.05). Ketamine usage normalized by total anaesthesia duration increased (P < 0.05) following sticker placement. The weekly cost of all drugs inventoried normalized for caseload did not differ during the measurement periods. Immediate cost awareness, implemented simply as price stickers on drug units, had minimal impact on clinicians' drug usage in a tertiary care setting.

A retrospective analysis of long-term use of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents in the intensive care unit, and guidelines for drug selection.

Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents (NNMBAs) are frequently administered to patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). We conducted a retrospective study of patients in intensive care who received infusions (> 48 hrs) of commonly used NNMBAs. The goals were to describe NNMBA use in our ICUs, determine patient characteristics, and assess the cost of the individual drugs. We found that atracurium was prescribed for 68% of study patients; 68% of the patients did not have renal, hepatic, or cardiovascular disease; dosages of NNMBAs varied; a statistically significant increase in dosage requirements over time occurred with atracurium; assessment of neuromuscular blockade was 100% subjective; and 41% and 17% of patients receiving atracurium and vecuronium, respectively, experienced prolonged neuromuscular weakness documented subjectively. As a result of this study, guidelines for agent selection were developed to facilitate cost effective use of NNMBA in our ICUs. Using these guidelines would potentially significantly decrease drug expenditures in this setting.