Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.953
Filter
1.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(10): e032199, 2024 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742522

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and impact of coronary emboli (CE) in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been specifically studied. The objective was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with AF and CE in a large series of patients with STEMI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated 2292 consecutive patients with STEMI and among them 225 patients with AF: 46 patients with a STEMI related to CE (group A) and 179 patients with a STEMI related to an atherosclerotic cause (group B). Compared with the 2067 patients without AF and CE (group C), patients with AF and CE were older (73 versus 59 years, P<0.05), more likely to be female (43% versus 22%, P<0.05), and presented more frequently with cardiogenic shock at admission (26% versus 9%, P<0.05). The baseline characteristics of patients with AF (group A versus B) did not differ significantly according to STEMI pathogenesis. In the unadjusted analysis, the 45-day mortality was higher in patients with CE and AF (group A versus group C: 20% versus 4%; P<0.05 and group A versus group B: 20% versus 8%, P=not significant); this trend persisted at 2-year follow-up (group A versus group C: 24% versus 6%; P<0.05 and group A versus group B: 24% versus 17%, P=not significant). After stabilized inverse exposure probability weighting adjustment, a higher 45-day mortality rate was confirmed in patients with CE and AF (group A versus group C: 18% versus 5%, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting with STEMI and AF, CE was associated with excess early mortality. REGISTRATION: URL: clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT05679843.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Embolism , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Female , Male , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/mortality , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/complications , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Aged , Embolism/mortality , Embolism/epidemiology , Embolism/diagnosis , Embolism/etiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Time Factors
2.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 470, 2024 May 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38811919

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As the global aging process continues to accelerate, heart failure (HF) has become an important cause of increased morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. Chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk factor for HF. Patients with HF combined with AF are more difficult to treat and have a worse prognosis. The aim of this study was to explore the risk factors for 1-year mortality in patients with HF combined with AF and to develop a risk prediction assessment model. METHODS: We recruited hospitalized patients with HF and AF who received standardized care in the Department of Cardiology at Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University from January 2013 to December 2018. The patients were randomly divided into modeling and internal validation groups using a random number generator at a 1:1 ratio. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for all-cause mortality during a one-year follow-up period. Then, a nomogram was constructed based on the weights of each index and validated. Receiver operating characteristic curve, the area under the curve (AUC), decision curve, and calibration curve analyses for survival were used to evaluate the model's predictive and clinical validities and calibration. RESULTS: We included 3,406 patients who met the eligibility criteria; 1,703 cases each were included in the modeling and internal validation groups. Eight statistically significant predictors were identified: age, sex, New York Heart Association cardiac function class III or IV, a history of myocardial infarction, and the albumin, triglycerides, N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide, and blood urea nitrogen levels. The AUCs were 0.793 (95% confidence interval: 0.763-0.823) and 0.794 (95% confidence interval: 0.763-0.823) in the modeling and validation cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We present a predictive model for all-cause mortality in patients with coexisting HF and AF comprising eight key factors. This model gives clinicians a simple assessment tool that may improve the clinical management of these patients.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Heart Failure , Nomograms , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Male , Female , Heart Failure/mortality , Aged , Risk Assessment/methods , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Chronic Disease , China/epidemiology , Aged, 80 and over , Cause of Death/trends
3.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(11): e032226, 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780172

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Individuals with both atrial fibrillation (AF) and myocardial infarction (MI) have higher mortality compared with individuals with only 1 condition. Whether mortality differs according to the temporal order of AF and MI is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included participants from the FHS (Framingham Heart Study) from 1960 and onwards. We assessed the hazard ratio (HR) of new-onset AF and MI, and mortality according to MI and AF status (prevalent and interim) using multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Interim diseases were modeled as time-varying variables. For the analysis of new-onset AF, 10 923 participants (55% women; mean±SD age, 54±8 years) were included. For new-onset MI, 10 804 participants (55% women; mean±SD age, 54±8 years) were included. Compared with no MI, the hazard of new-onset AF was higher in participants with prevalent (HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.32-1.94]) and interim MI (HR, 3.96 [95% CI, 3.18-4.91]). Both ST-segment-elevation MI and non-ST-segment-elevation MI were associated with new-onset AF. Interim AF, not prevalent AF, was associated with higher hazard rate of new-onset MI (HR, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.67-2.92]). Interim AF was associated with both ST-segment-elevation MI and non-ST-segment-elevation MI. Mortality was significantly greater among participants with AF and MI compared with participants with 1 of the 2, regardless of temporal order. CONCLUSIONS: We report a bidirectional association between AF and MI, which was observed for both non-ST-segment-elevation MI and ST-segment-elevation MI. Participants with both AF and MI had considerably higher mortality compared with participants with only 1 of the 2 conditions, regardless of order.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Aged , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Prevalence , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/mortality , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Massachusetts/epidemiology , Proportional Hazards Models , Prognosis
4.
Vasc Health Risk Manag ; 20: 231-244, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38774425

ABSTRACT

Background: While treatment interruption of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) for elective surgery or procedures among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is becoming more prevalent, there remains insufficient evidence regarding the optimal perioperative management of NOACs, particularly procedures with minor bleeding risks. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a simplified, standardized protocol for perioperative management of direct factor Xa inhibitors in patients, with AF undergoing procedures associated with minor bleeding risk. Methods: This multicenter, prospective single-arm registry study plans to enroll patients undergoing procedures with minor bleeding risk who were prescribed direct factor Xa inhibitors for AF. The procedures with minor bleeding risk will include gastrointestinal endoscopy for diagnostic purposes, selected dental procedures, and ocular surgery for cataracts or glaucoma. For apixaban, patients will withhold the last evening dose and resume either from the evening dose of the procedure day or the following morning, depending on the bleeding risk of the patient. For edoxaban or rivaroxaban, patients will withhold only a single dose on the procedure day. The primary outcome is the occurrence of major bleeding events within 30 days. Secondary outcomes include systemic thromboembolism, all-cause mortality, and a composite of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events. Conclusion: This study has the potential to generate evidence regarding the safety of perioperative management for patients, with AF undergoing procedures associated with minor bleeding risk. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05801068.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Factor Xa Inhibitors , Hemorrhage , Perioperative Care , Pyrazoles , Pyridones , Registries , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Administration, Oral , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Factor Xa Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Perioperative Care/methods , Risk Assessment , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Time Factors , Pyridones/adverse effects , Pyridones/administration & dosage , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Pyridines/adverse effects , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Drug Administration Schedule , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Rivaroxaban/administration & dosage , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Research Design , Thiazoles
5.
Arq Bras Cardiol ; 121(3): e20230470, 2024.
Article in Portuguese, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695466

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with hypercoagulability. It remains uncertain whether ongoing anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients who later contract COVID-19 improves clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To compare chronic oral anticoagulation with no previous anticoagulation in patients with AF who contracted a COVID-19 infection concerning the outcomes of all-cause mortality, COVID-19 mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and hospitalization. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for eligible studies from inception to December 2022. We included studies comparing COVID-19 outcomes in patients with versus without prior chronic anticoagulation for AF. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled with a random-effects model. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Quality assessment and risk of bias were performed according to Cochrane recommendations. RESULTS: Ten studies comprising 1,177,858 patients with COVID-19 and AF were identified, of whom 893,772 (75.9%) were on prior chronic anticoagulation for AF. In patients with COVID-19, being on chronic anticoagulation for AF significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.99; p = 0.048; I2 = 89%) and COVID-19-related mortality (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.79; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%) when compared with no prior anticoagulation. In contrast, there was no difference between groups regarding hospitalization (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.41; p = 0.587; I2 = 95%) or ICU admission (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.09; p = 0.216; I2 = 69%). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis, chronic anticoagulation for patients with AF who contracted COVID-19 was associated with significantly lower rates of all-cause mortality and COVID-19-related mortality as compared with no previous anticoagulation.


FUNDAMENTO: A doença por coronavírus 2019 (COVID-19) está associada à hipercoagulabilidade. Permanece incerto se a anticoagulação contínua para fibrilação atrial (FA) em pacientes que posteriormente contraem COVID-19 melhora os desfechos clínicos. OBJETIVOS: Comparar a anticoagulação oral crônica com ausência de anticoagulação prévia em pacientes com FA que contraíram uma infecção por COVID-19 em relação aos desfechos de mortalidade por todas as causas, mortalidade por COVID-19, admissão em unidade de terapia intensiva (UTI) e hospitalização. MÉTODOS: Buscamos sistematicamente no PubMed, Embase e Cochrane Library estudos elegíveis desde o início até dezembro de 2022. Incluímos estudos que compararam desfechos de COVID-19 em pacientes com e sem anticoagulação crônica prévia para FA. Foram agrupadas razões de risco (RR) com intervalos de confiança (IC) de 95% por meio de um modelo de efeitos aleatórios. O nível de significância foi estabelecido em p < 0,05. As avaliações da qualidade e do risco de viés foram realizadas de acordo com as recomendações da Cochrane. RESULTADOS: Foram identificados 10 estudos abrangendo 1.177.858 pacientes com COVID-19 e FA, dos quais 893.772 (75,9%) estavam em anticoagulação crônica prévia para FA. Em pacientes com COVID-19, a anticoagulação crônica para FA reduziu significativamente a mortalidade por todas as causas (RR 0,75; IC 95% 0,57 a 0,99; p = 0,048; I2 = 89%) e a mortalidade relacionada à COVID-19 (RR 0,76; IC 95% 0,72 a 0,79; p < 0,001; I2 = 0%) quando comparada com a ausência de anticoagulação prévia. Em contrapartida, não houve diferença entre os grupos em relação à hospitalização (RR 1,08; IC 95% 0,82 a 1,41; p = 0,587; I2 = 95%) ou internação em UTI (RR 0,86; IC 95% 0,68 a 1,09; p = 0,216; I2 = 69%). CONCLUSÕES: Nesta metanálise, a anticoagulação crônica para pacientes com FA que contraíram COVID-19 foi associada a taxas significativamente mais baixas de mortalidade por todas as causas e mortalidade relacionada à COVID-19 em comparação com a ausência de anticoagulação anterior.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Atrial Fibrillation , COVID-19 , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/complications , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Intensive Care Units
6.
Open Heart ; 11(1)2024 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719499

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are increasingly used for long-term rhythm monitoring after ischaemic and cryptogenic stroke, with the goal of detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) and subsequent initiation of oral anticoagulation to reduce risk of adverse clinical outcomes. There is a need to determine the effectiveness of different rhythm monitoring strategies in this context. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of individuals with commercial and Medicare Advantage insurance in Optum Labs Data Warehouse who had incident ischaemic or cryptogenic stroke and no prior cardiovascular implantable electronic device from 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2021. Patients were stratified by rhythm monitoring strategy: ILR, long-term continuous external cardiac monitor (>48 hours to 30 days) or Holter monitor (≤48 hours). The primary outcome was risk-adjusted all-cause mortality at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included new diagnosis of AF and oral anticoagulation, bleeding, and costs. RESULTS: Among 48 901 patients with ischaemic or cryptogenic stroke, 9235 received an ILR, 29 103 long-term continuous external monitor and 10 563 Holter monitor only. Mean age was 69.9 (SD 11.9) years and 53.5% were female. During the 12-month follow-up period, patients who received ILRs compared with those who received long-term continuous external monitors had a higher odds of new diagnosis of AF and oral anticoagulant initiation (adjusted OR 2.27, 95% CI 2.09 to 2.48). Compared with patients who received long-term continuous external monitors, those who received ILRs had similar 12-month mortality (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.12), with approximately $13 000 higher costs at baseline (including monitor cost) and $2500 higher costs during 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this large real-world study of patients with ischaemic or cryptogenic stroke, ILR placement resulted in more diagnosis of AF and initiation of oral anticoagulation, but no difference in mortality compared with long-term continuous external monitors.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory , Ischemic Stroke , Humans , Female , Male , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory/instrumentation , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory/economics , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory/methods , Ischemic Stroke/economics , Ischemic Stroke/mortality , Ischemic Stroke/diagnosis , Ischemic Stroke/prevention & control , Ischemic Stroke/etiology , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , United States/epidemiology , Anticoagulants/economics , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Time Factors , Middle Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Aged, 80 and over , Health Care Costs
7.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 12206, 2024 05 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806552

ABSTRACT

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and its incidence increases with sepsis. However, data on new-onset AF during sepsis hospitalization remain limited in China. We aimed to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and associated mortality of new-onset AF in sepsis patients in China. We conducted a retrospective study using the National Data Center for Medical Service system, from 1923 tertiary and 2363 secondary hospitals from 31 provinces in China from 2017 to 2019.In total we included 1,425,055 sepsis patients ≥ 18 years without prior AF. The incidence of new-onset AF was 1.49%. Older age, male sex, hypertension, heart failure, coronary disease, valvular disease, and mechanical ventilation were independent risk factor. New-onset AF was associated with a slight increased risk of mortality (adjusted RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.06). Population attributable fraction suggested AF accounted for 0.2% of sepsis deaths. In this large nationwide cohort, new-onset AF occurred in 1.49% of sepsis admissions and was associated with a small mortality increase. Further research should examine whether optimized AF management can improve sepsis outcomes in China.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Hospital Mortality , Sepsis , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Sepsis/mortality , Sepsis/complications , Sepsis/epidemiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Risk Factors , China/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Incidence , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data
8.
J Comp Eff Res ; 13(6): e240008, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38602503

ABSTRACT

Aim: Patients with ischemic stroke (IS) commonly undergo monitoring to identify atrial fibrillation with mobile cardiac outpatient telemetry (MCOT) or implantable loop recorders (ILRs). The authors compared readmission, healthcare cost and survival in patients monitored post-stroke with either MCOT or ILR. Materials & methods: The authors used claims data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database to identify patients with IS hospitalized from January 2017 to December 2020 who were prescribed ambulatory cardiac monitoring via MCOT or ILR. They compared the costs associated with the initial inpatient visit as well as the rate and causes of readmission, survival and healthcare costs over the following 18 months. Datasets were balanced using patient baseline and hospitalization characteristics. Multivariable generalized linear gamma regression was used for cost comparisons. Cox proportional hazard regression was used for survival and readmission analysis. Sub-cohorts were analyzed based on the severity of the index IS. Results: In 2244 patients, readmissions were significantly lower in the MCOT monitored group (30.2%) compared with the ILR group (35.4%) (hazard ratio [HR] 1.23; 95% CI: 1.04-1.46). Average cost over 18 months starting with the index IS was $27,429 (USD) lower in the MCOT group (95% CI: $22,353-$32,633). Survival difference bordered on statistical significance and trended to lower mortality in MCOT (8.9%) versus ILR (11.3%) (HR 1.30; 95% CI: 1:00-1.69), led by significance in patients with complications or comorbidities with the index event (MCOT 7.5%, ILR 11.5%; HR 1.62; 95% CI: 1.11-2.36). Conclusion: The use of MCOT versus ILR as the primary monitor following IS was associated with significant decreases in readmission, lower costs for the initial IS and total care over the next 18 months, significantly lower mortality for patients with complications and comorbidities at the index stroke, and a trend toward improved survival across all patients.


Subject(s)
Patient Readmission , Telemetry , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Telemetry/economics , Telemetry/methods , Telemetry/instrumentation , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/economics , Middle Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/economics , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Stroke/economics , Stroke/mortality , Stroke/diagnosis , Ischemic Stroke/economics , Ischemic Stroke/diagnosis , Ischemic Stroke/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Aged, 80 and over
9.
Int J Cardiol ; 408: 132098, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38679168

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is increasingly used for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and anticoagulant-related complications. Yet, real-life studies evaluating changes in patient characteristics and indications for LAAO remain scarce. METHODS: To evaluate changes in patient characteristics and indications for LAAO defined as 2-year history of intracerebral bleeding, any ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (SE), any non-intracerebral bleeding, other indication, and 1-year mortality. All patients undergoing percutaneous LAAO in Denmark from 2013 to 2021 were stratified into the following year groups: 2013-2015, 2016-2018, and 2019-2021. RESULTS: In total, 1465 patients underwent LAAO. Age remained stable (2013-2015: 74 years versus 2019-2021: 75 years). Patients' comorbidity burden declined, exemplified by CHA2DS2-VASc ≥4 and HAS-BLED ≥3 decreased from 56.7% and 63.7% in 2013-2015 to 40.3% and 45.8% in 2019-2021. Indications for LAAO changed over time with other indication comprising 44.7% in 2019-2021; up from 26.9% in 2013-2015. Conversely, fewer patients had an indication of any ischemic stroke/SE (2013-2015: 30.8% vs 2019-2021: 20.3%) or any non-intracerebral bleeding (2013-2015: 29.4% vs 2019-2021: 23.4%). 1-year mortality was 11.3% for any non-intracerebral bleeding and 6.2% for other indication. CONCLUSION: The LAAO patient-profile has changed considerably. Age remained stable, while comorbidity burden decreased during the period 2013-2021. LAAO is increasingly used in patients with no clinical event history and mortality differs according to indication. Selection of patients to LAAO should be done carefully, and contemporary real-life studies investigating clinical practice could add important insights.


Subject(s)
Atrial Appendage , Atrial Fibrillation , Humans , Atrial Appendage/surgery , Male , Aged , Female , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Aged, 80 and over , Denmark/epidemiology , Mortality/trends , Stroke/mortality , Stroke/prevention & control , Middle Aged , Cardiac Catheterization/trends , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Registries
10.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(9): e033897, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38686875

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Population-based data on heart failure (HF)-related death in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are lacking. We assessed HF-related death in people with AF in the United States over the past 21 years and examined differences by age, sex, race, ethnicity, urbanization, and census region. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were extracted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research to determine trends in age-adjusted mortality rates per 100 000 people, due to HF-related death among subjects with AF aged ≥15 years. To calculate nationwide annual trends, we assessed the average annual percent change (AAPC) and annual percent change with relative 95% CIs using joinpoint regression. Between 1999 and 2020, 916 685 HF-related deaths (396 205 men and 520 480 women) occurred among US adults having a concomitant AF. The overall age-adjusted mortality rates increased (AAPC: +4.1% [95% CI, 3.8-4.4]; P<0.001), especially after 2011 (annual percent change, +6.8% [95% CI, 6.2-7.4]; P<0.001) in men (AAPC, +4.8% [95% CI, 4.4-5.1]; P<0.001), in White subjects (AAPC: +4.2% [95% CI, 3.9 to 4.6]; P<0.001) and in subjects aged <65 years (AAPC: +7.5% [95% CI, 6.7-8.4]; P<0.001). The higher percentage of deaths were registered in the South (32.8%). During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant excess in HF-related deaths among patients with AF aged >65 years was observed. CONCLUSIONS: A worrying increase in the HF-related mortality rate among patients with AF has been observed in the United States over the past 2 decades.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Heart Failure , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Male , Female , United States/epidemiology , Aged , Middle Aged , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Adolescent , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/epidemiology , Young Adult , Risk Factors , Cause of Death/trends , Age Distribution , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 17(5): e012143, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38646831

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The risk factor (RF) burden, clinical course, and long-term outcome among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) aged <65 years is unclear. METHODS: Adult (n=67 221; mean age, 72.4±12.3 years; and 45% women) patients with AF evaluated at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between January 2010 and December 2019 were studied. Hospital system-wide electronic health records and administrative data were utilized to ascertain RFs, comorbidities, and subsequent hospitalization and cardiac interventions. The association of AF with all-cause mortality among those aged <65 years was analyzed using an internal contemporary cohort of patients without AF (n=918 073). RESULTS: Nearly one-quarter (n=17 335) of the cohort was aged <65 years (32% women) with considerable cardiovascular RFs (current smoker, 16%; mean body mass index, 33.0±8.3; hypertension, 55%; diabetes, 21%; heart failure, 20%; coronary artery disease, 19%; and prior ischemic stroke, 6%) and comorbidity burden (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 11%; obstructive sleep apnea, 18%; and chronic kidney disease, 1.3%). Over mean follow-up of >5 years, 2084 (6.7%, <50 years; 13%, 50-65 years) patients died. The proportion of patients with >1 hospitalization for myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke was 1.3%, 4.8%, and 1.1% for those aged <50 years and 2.2%, 7.4%, and 1.1% for the 50- to 65-year subgroup, respectively. Multiple cardiac and noncardiac RFs were associated with increased mortality in younger patients with AF with heart failure and hypertension demonstrating significant age-related interaction (P=0.007 and P=0.013, respectively). Patients with AF aged <65 years experienced significantly worse survival compared with comorbidity-adjusted patients without AF (men aged <50 years and hazard ratio, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.24-1.79]; 50-65 years and hazard ratio, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.26-1.43]; women aged <50 years and hazard ratio, 2.4 [95% CI, 1.82-3.16]; 50-65 years and hazard ratio, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.6-1.92]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AF aged <65 years have significant comorbidity burden and considerable long-term mortality. They are also at a significantly increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure, stroke, and myocardial infarction. These patients warrant an aggressive focus on RF and comorbidity evaluation and management.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Comorbidity , Hospitalization , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Female , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Risk Assessment , Age Factors , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Cause of Death/trends
12.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 17(5): e013579, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38629273

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of left atrial appendage (LAA) patency, including those with and without visible peri-device leak (PDL), post-LAA closure in patients with atrial fibrillation, remains elusive. METHODS: Patients with atrial fibrillation implanted with the WATCHMAN 2.5 device were prospectively enrolled. The device surveillance by cardiac computed tomography angiography was performed at 3 months post-procedure. Adverse events, including stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), major bleeding, cardiovascular death, all-cause death, and the combined major adverse events (MAEs), were compared between patients with complete closure and LAA patency. RESULTS: Among 519 patients with cardiac computed tomography angiography surveillance at 3 months post-LAA closure, 271 (52.2%) showed complete closure, and LAA patency was detected in 248 (47.8%) patients, including 196 (37.8%) with visible PDL and 52 (10.0%) without visible PDL. During a median of 1193 (787-1543) days follow-up, the presence of LAA patency was associated with increased risks of stroke/TIA (adjusted hazard ratio for baseline differences, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.17-8.83]; P=0.023) and MAEs (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.06-1.17]; P=0.003). Specifically, LAA patency with visible PDL was associated with increased risks of stroke/TIA (hazard ratio, 3.66 [95% CI, 1.29-10.42]; P=0.015) and MAEs (hazard ratio, 3.71 [95% CI, 1.71-8.07]; P=0.001), although LAA patency without visible PDL showed higher risks of MAEs (hazard ratio, 3.59 [95% CI, 1.28-10.09]; P=0.015). Incidences of stroke/TIA (2.8% versus 3.0% versus 6.7% versus 22.2%; P=0.010), cardiovascular death (0.9% versus 0% versus 1.7% versus 11.1%; P=0.005), and MAEs (4.6% versus 9.0% versus 11.7% versus 22.2%; P=0.017) increased with larger PDL (0, >0 to ≤3, >3 to ≤5, or >5 mm). Older age and discontinuing antiplatelet therapy at 6 months were independent predictors of stroke/TIA and MAEs in patients with LAA patency. CONCLUSIONS: LAA patency detected by cardiac computed tomography angiography at 3 months post-LAA closure is associated with unfavorable prognosis in patients with atrial fibrillation implanted with WATCHMAN 2.5 device. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03788941.


Subject(s)
Atrial Appendage , Atrial Fibrillation , Cardiac Catheterization , Computed Tomography Angiography , Ischemic Attack, Transient , Stroke , Humans , Atrial Appendage/physiopathology , Atrial Appendage/diagnostic imaging , Male , Female , Aged , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnostic imaging , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Ischemic Attack, Transient/etiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/mortality , Aged, 80 and over , Middle Aged , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Risk Assessment , Hemorrhage , Prosthesis Design
13.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 17(5): e012697, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38629286

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clinically detected atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a significant increase in mortality and other adverse cardiovascular events. Since the advent of effective methods for AF rhythm control, investigators have attempted to determine how much these adverse prognostic AF effects could be mitigated by the restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) and whether the method used mattered. METHODS: The CABANA trial (Catheter Ablation versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation) randomized 2204 AF patients to ablation versus drug therapy, of which 1240 patients were monitored in follow-up using the CABANA ECG rhythm monitoring system. To assess the prognostic benefits of SR, we performed a prespecified analysis using Cox survival modeling with heart rhythm as a time-dependent variable and randomized treatment group as a stratification factor. RESULTS: In the 1240 patient study cohort, 883 (71.2%) had documented AF at some point during their postblanking follow-up. Among the 883 patients, 671 (76.0%) experienced AF within the first year of postblanking follow-up, and 212 (24.0%) experienced their first AF after ≥1 year of postblanking follow-up. The primary CABANA end point (death, disabling stroke, serious bleeding, or cardiac arrest) occurred in 95 (10.8%) of the 883 patients with documented AF and in 29 (8.1%) of the 357 patients with no AF recorded during follow-up. In multivariable time-dependent analysis, the presence of SR (compared with non-SR) was associated with a significantly reduced risk of the primary end point (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.38-0.85]; P=0.006; independent of treatment strategy [ablation versus drugs]). Corresponding results for all-cause mortality were adjusted hazard ratio of 0.59 [95% CI, 0.35-1.01]; P=0.053). CONCLUSIONS: In patients in the CABANA trial with detailed long-term rhythm follow-up, increased time in SR was associated with a clinically consequential decrease in mortality and other adverse prognostic events. The predictive value of SR was independent of the therapeutic approach responsible for reducing the burden of detectable AF. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT00911508.


Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents , Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Heart Rate , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Male , Female , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Risk Factors , Prognosis , Risk Assessment , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory , Action Potentials
14.
Clin Res Cardiol ; 113(6): 942-950, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38446151

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence showing that systemic autoimmune diseases (SADs) are associated with a high risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the impact of SAD on the clinical course of AF patients is largely unknown. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study within a federated healthcare network (TriNetX). Using ICD codes, AF patients on anticoagulant therapy were categorized according to the presence of SAD (M32: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE); M33: Dermato-polymyositis (DMP); M34: Systemic Sclerosis (SSc); M35: Sjogren syndrome). The primary outcomes were the 5-year risks of (1) all-cause death, (2) thrombotic events (ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism), and (3) bleeding (intracranial (ICH) and gastrointestinal (GI)). Secondary outcomes were each component of the primary outcomes. Cox regression analysis after propensity score matching (PSM) was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI). RESULTS: We identified 16,098 AF patients with SAD (68.2 ± 13.4 years; 71.0% female) and 828,772 AF controls (70.7 ± 12.9 years, 41.1% females). After PSM, AF patients with SAD were associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (HR 1.13, 95%CI 1.09-1.71), thrombotic events (HR 1.37, 95%CI 1.32-1.43), and hemorrhagic events (HR 1.41, 95%CI 1.33-1.50) compared to AF controls without SAD. The highest risk of all-cause death and GI bleeding was associated with SSc, while the highest risk of thrombotic events and ICH was associated with SLE. CONCLUSION: AF patients with SAD are associated with a high risk of all-cause death, thrombotic, and hemorrhagic events. These patients merit careful follow-up and integrated care management to improve their prognosis.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Atrial Fibrillation , Autoimmune Diseases , Hemorrhage , Thrombosis , Humans , Female , Male , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Autoimmune Diseases/complications , Autoimmune Diseases/mortality , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/mortality , Thrombosis/mortality , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Risk Assessment/methods , Cause of Death/trends , Middle Aged , Follow-Up Studies , Survival Rate/trends
15.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 64: 7-14, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38448258

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder embolization is an infrequent but serious complication. OBJECTIVES: We aim to describe timing, management and clinical outcomes of device embolization in a multi-center registry. METHODS: Patient characteristics, imaging findings and procedure and follow-up data were collected retrospectively. Device embolizations were categorized according to 1) timing 2) management and 3) clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-seven centers contributed data. Device embolization occurred in 108 patients. In 70.4 % of cases, it happened within the first 24 h of the procedure. The device was purposefully left in the LA and the aorta in two (1.9 %) patients, an initial percutaneous retrieval was attempted in 81 (75.0 %) and surgery without prior percutaneous retrieval attempt was performed in 23 (21.3 %) patients. Two patients died before a retrieval attempt could be made. In 28/81 (34.6 %) patients with an initial percutaneous retrieval attempt a second, additional attempt was performed, which was associated with a high mortality (death in patients with one attempt: 2.9 % vs. second attempt: 21.4 %, p < 0.001). The primary outcome (bailout surgery, cardiogenic shock, stroke, TIA, and/or death) occurred in 47 (43.5 %) patients. Other major complications related to device embolization occurred in 21 (19.4 %) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of device embolizations after LAA closure occurs early. A percutaneous approach is often the preferred method for a first rescue attempt. Major adverse event rates, including death, are high particularly if the first retrieval attempt was unsuccessful. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: This dedicated multicenter registry examined timing, management, and clinical outcome of device embolization. Early embolization (70.4 %) was most frequent. As a first rescue attempt, percutaneous retrieval was preferred in 75.0 %, followed by surgical removal (21.3 %). In patients with a second retrieval attempt a higher mortality (death first attempt: 2.9 % vs. death second attempt: 24.1 %, p < 0.001) was observed. Mortality (10.2 %) and the major complication rate after device embolization were high.


Subject(s)
Atrial Appendage , Atrial Fibrillation , Cardiac Catheterization , Device Removal , Registries , Humans , Male , Atrial Appendage/diagnostic imaging , Atrial Appendage/physiopathology , Female , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Aged, 80 and over , Risk Factors , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Cardiac Catheterization/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Device Removal/adverse effects , Embolism/etiology , Embolism/mortality , Middle Aged , Septal Occluder Device , Left Atrial Appendage Closure
16.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 63: 23-30, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38267285

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a non-pharmacologic alternative to oral anticoagulation in reducing stroke risk in AF patients. However, patients with mitral valve disease (MVD), who are expected to have a significantly greater risk of left atrium (LA) thrombus formation and embolic stroke were excluded from randomized trials examining percutaneous LAAO. To address this gap, we present a national registry analysis of the use of LAAO among patients with MVD. METHODS: Using the National Readmissions Database, we performed a retrospective review of all hospitalizations for LAAO identified between September 2015 and November 2019. Of these, patients with ICD-10 codes for MVD were identified. Propensity matched (PSM) analysis was used to compare patients with MVD with a matched sample of patients undergoing LAAO with non-valvular AF. Outcomes examined included all-cause mortality, stroke, major bleeding, pericardial effusion (PE), and tamponade. RESULTS: 51,540 patients who underwent LAAO without a history of MVD and 3777 with a history of MVD were identified. Crude analysis demonstrated the odds of mortality, PE, and cardiac tamponade during index hospitalization to be higher in the MVD group. The length of stay and cost of index hospitalization were also slightly greater for the MVD group. A sample of 7649 patients (MVD: 3777 MVD and no MVD: 3872) were selected for PSM analysis with similar comorbidities across the two groups. In the PSM comparison, MVD was associated with higher risk of PE. The MVD group had a slightly higher rate of readmissions the association with PE remained at 30-day readmission (OR: 2.099 [1.360-3.238], p-value: <0.001). CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study examining the use of LAAO among MVD patients. Our findings suggest that patients with MVD who underwent LAAO had a higher risk of post-procedural PE without an increase in mortality, stroke, or major bleeding. These results provide a rationale for considering LAAO as part of the stroke prevention strategy among patients with valvular AF.


Subject(s)
Atrial Appendage , Atrial Fibrillation , Cardiac Catheterization , Databases, Factual , Mitral Valve , Patient Readmission , Registries , Stroke , Humans , Atrial Appendage/physiopathology , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Mitral Valve/physiopathology , Mitral Valve/surgery , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , United States/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Time Factors , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/mortality , Risk Assessment , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/prevention & control , Stroke/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Aged, 80 and over , Heart Valve Diseases/mortality , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Heart Valve Diseases/complications , Heart Valve Diseases/physiopathology , Heart Valve Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Hospital Costs
17.
Am J Med Sci ; 367(1): 41-48, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37979919

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Studies on the association between C-reactive protein (CRP) level and poor outcomes have been yielded controversial results in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This meta-analysis sought to investigate the utility of elevated CRP level in predicting adverse outcomes in AF patients. METHODS: Two authors systematically searched PubMed and Embase databases (until December 10, 2022) for studies evaluating the value of elevated CRP level in predicting all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, stroke, or major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in AF patients. The predictive value of CRP was expressed by pooling adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the highest versus the lowest level or per unit of log-transformed increase. RESULTS: Ten studies including 30,345 AF patients satisfied our inclusion criteria. For the highest versus the lowest CRP level, the pooled adjusted HR was 1.57 (95% CI 1.34-1.85) for all-cause mortality, 1.18 (95% CI 0.92-1.50) for cardiovascular death, and 1.57 (95% CI 1.10-2.24) for stroke, respectively. When analyzed the CRP level as continuous data, per unit of log-transformed increase was associated with a 27% higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.23-1.32) and 16% higher risk of MACEs (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.05-1.28). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated CRP level may be an independent predictor of all-cause mortality, stroke, and MACEs in patients with AF. CRP level at baseline can provide important prognostic information in risk classification of AF patients.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , C-Reactive Protein , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/blood , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Stroke/blood , Stroke/mortality
18.
Gerontology ; 69(12): 1471-1481, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37793355

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a prevalent heart arrhythmia in elderly adults aged 80 years or older. The red cell distribution width (RDW) to albumin ratio has been acknowledged as a reliable prognostic marker for poor outcomes in a variety of disorders. However, there exists limited scientific evidence on the association of RDW to albumin (RAR) with mortality in geriatric individuals with AF. METHODS: From January 2015 to June 2020, a retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary academic institution that diagnosed 1,141 elderly adults with AF. The RAR value was calculated as the ratio of RDW (%) to albumin (g/dL). The potential association between RAR and cardiovascular mortality and the risk of all-cause mortality within 28 days was evaluated by means of multivariable Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The 28-day all-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates were 8.7% and 3.3%, respectively. Increased RAR tertiles were found to be significantly associated with greater all-cause mortality (T1: 1.6%; T2: 6.2%; T3: 18.1%, p < 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (T1: 0.8%; T2: 2.9%; T3: 6.3%, p < 0.001) using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Continuous RAR had a positive association with all-cause mortality (hazard ratios [HR] = 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-1.65) and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.05-1.64), even after accounting for numerous confounding variables. In comparison to the T1 group, individuals with the highest RAR levels displayed a greater risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 2.73, 95% CI: 1.11-6.74) and cardiovascular mortality (HR = 2.59, 95% CI: 0.69-9.78). Increased RAR levels were related to higher rates of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality across almost all subgroups. CONCLUSION: RAR is independently correlated with 28-day all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in AF-affected individuals aged ≥80.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , East Asian People , Erythrocyte Indices , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Serum Albumin, Human , Aged, 80 and over
19.
Heart Rhythm ; 20(6): 833-841, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36813092

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rates of early mortality and complications after catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) vary across health care settings. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the rate and predictors of early mortality (within 30 days) after CA in the inpatient and outpatient settings. METHODS: Using the Medicare Fee for Service database, we analyzed 122,289 patients who underwent CA for treatment of AF between 2016 and 2019 to define 30-day mortality in both inpatients and outpatients. Odds of adjusted mortality were assessed with several methods, including inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: Mean age was 71.9 ± 6.7 years, 44% were women, and mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.2 ± 1.7. Overall, 82% underwent AF ablation as an outpatient. Mortality rate 30 days after CA was 0.6%, with inpatients accounting for 71.5% of deaths (P <.001). Early mortality rates were 0.2% for outpatient procedures and 2.4% for inpatient procedures. The prevalence of comorbidities was significantly higher in patients with early mortality. Patients with early mortality had significantly higher rates of postprocedural complications. After adjustment, inpatient ablation was significantly associated with early mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.87-5.08; P <.001). Hospitals with high overall ablation volume had 31% lower odds of early mortality (highest vs lowest tertile: aOR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56-0.86; P <.001). CONCLUSION: AF ablation conducted in the inpatient setting is associated with a higher rate of early mortality compared with outpatient AF ablation. Comorbidities are associated with enhanced risk of early mortality. High overall ablation volume is associated with a lower risk of early mortality.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Atrial Fibrillation/mortality , Catheter Ablation/methods , Inpatients , Medicare , Outpatients , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...