The French Cochlear Implant Registry (EPIIC): Cochlear implant candidacy assessment of off-label indications.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate in France the outcomes of cochlear implantation outside the selection criteria, off-label. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study including adults and children having received a cochlear implant (CI) in an off-label indication, that is outside the criteria established by the "Haute Autorité de santé (HAS)" in 2012. The data was collected from the "EPIIC" registry on recipients who received CIs in France between 2011 and 2014. Speech audiometry was performed at 60dB preimplantation and after one year of CI use, as well as an evaluation of the scores of the quality of life with the APHAB questionnaire, the scores for CAP and the professional/academic status in pre- and post-implantation conditions. Major and minor complications at surgery have been recorded. RESULTS: In total, 590 patients (447 adults and 143 children) with an off-label indication for CIs were included in this study from the EPIIC registry (11.7% of the whole cohort of EPIIC). For adults, the median percentage of comprehension using monosyllabic word lists was 41% in preimplantation condition versus 53% after one year of CI use (P<0.001) and 60% versus 71% in dissyllabic word lists (P<0.001). The CAP scores were 5 versus 6 in pre- and post-implantation conditions respectively (P<0.001) and the APHAB scores were statistically lower after implantation (P<0.001). In the children cohort, the median percentage of comprehension using monosyllabic word lists was 51% in preimplantation condition and 65% after CI (P<0.001), and 48% versus 82% (P<0.001) for dissyllabic word lists. The CAP scores were 5 versus 7 respectively in pre- and post-CI conditions (P<0.001). Thirty-two minor complications (5.4%) and 17 major complications (2.8%) were reported in our panel of off-label indication patients. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a revision of the cochlear implantation candidacy criteria is necessary to allow more patients with severe or asymmetric hearing loss to benefit from a CI when there is an impact on quality of life despite the use of an optimal hearing aid.

Perfil clínico y resultados obtenidos en los pacientes tratados mediante implante auditivo del tronco del encéfalo / Clinical Profile and Results Obtained in Patients Treated by Auditory Brainstem Implants

INTRODUCCIÓN: Los implantes cocleares han paliado algunas hipoacusias, pero las relacionadas con alteraciones del nervio coclear obligaron a buscar nuevas formas de tratamiento, dando lugar a los implantes auditivos del tronco cerebral (IATC). OBJETIVOS: Exponer el perfil clínico de los pacientes tratados mediante un IATC y los resultados entre los años 1997 y 2017. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se seleccionaron por un lado pacientes con tumores del nervio estatoacústico (VIII par craneal) y por otro lado pacientes sin tumores del VIII con malformaciones congénitas del oído interno. Previa y posteriormente a la colocación del IATC se evaluó la audición a través de audiometría tonal liminar, de la que se obtuvo el umbral tonal medio (UTM) y de la escala de rendimiento auditivo Categories Auditory Performance (CAP). RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron un total de 20 pacientes sometidos a una cirugía de IATC. Ocho de los casos fueron de causa tumoral (40%) y 12 no tumorales (60%). En 15 sujetos (75%) se realizó abordaje suboccipital y en 5 (25%) translaberíntico. La media de electrodos activos al inicio en los implantes de la casa comercial Cochlear® (Nucleus ABI24), la cual tiene un total de 21 electrodos, fue de 13 (61,90%) frente a 8,5 (70,83%) de los 12 electrodos que presenta el implante de la casa Med-el® (ABI Med-el). Se comprobó una mejora en el UTM medio de 118,49dB basal frente a 46,55 dB a los 2 años. En la escala CAP se parte en todos los casos de un valor de1, y en la revisión a los 2 años, de 2,57 (1-5). CONCLUSIÓN: Concluimos que el IATC es una opción segura y con buenos resultados auditivos cuando la indicación se hace de manera correcta

INTRODUCTION: Cochlear implants have been able to treat some types of hearing loss, but those related to cochlear nerve impairment made it necessary to find new ways to manage these deficits; leading to auditory brainstem implants (ABI). AIM: Our objective is to present the clinical profile of patients treated through an ABI and the results obtained from 1997 to 2017. MATERIAL AND METHODS: On the one hand, patients with statoacoustic nerve tumours (VIII cranial nerve) were selected, and on the other hand, patients withoutVIII tumours with congenital malformations of the inner ear. Before and after the placement of the ABI, hearing was assessed through tonal audiometry, from which the PTA (Pure Tone Average) and the CAP (Categories of Auditory Performance) scale were obtained. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients undergoing ABI surgery were included. Eight were of tumour cause (40%) and 12 non-tumour (60%). In 15 subjects (75%) a suboccipital approach was performed and in 5 (25%) translabyrinthine. The mean of active electrodes before the implantation of Cochlear® (Nucleus ABI24) was 13/21 (61.90%) versus 8.5/12 (70.83%) of the Med-el® (ABI Med-el). An improvement in the mean PTA of 118.49 dB was found against 46.55dB at 2 years. On the CAP scale, values of1 were obtained in the preimplantation and of 2.57 (1-5) in the 2-year revision. CONCLUSION: The ABI is a safe option, and with good hearing results when the indication is made correctly

Paediatric auditory brainstem implantation: The South Asian experience.

INTRODUCTION: Paediatric Auditory Brainstem Implantation (ABI) is indicated for children with congenital cochlear aplasia, absent/hypoplastic vestibulocochlear nerve, for whom cochlear implantation is not possible. Knowledge of the anatomical landmarks and variants in anatomy of the brainstem is vital for ABI surgery. METHOD: Study was done at Auditory implant centre in Madras ENT research foundation, which includes 24 children who had undergone ABI surgery and are being followed up for 1 year, post operatively. Aims were to study the anatomical variants and the outcomes of ABI implantation. To determine if different anatomical variants effect placement of ABI electrode. To assess the patient outcomes by Categories of auditory Performance (CAP) scores and Speech Intelligibility Ratings (SIR) scores. RESULTS: All the candidates showed gradual improvement in audiological and verbal outcomes after the ABI. The mean CAP and SIR scores after 6 months of AVHT were 2.07 and 1.37 respectively. After 1 year of auditory verbal rehabilitation therapy CAP was 3.42 and SIR was 2.33. Flocculus of the cerebellum can be of different grades. Though, there was difficulty in insertion of the electrode in subjects with anatomical variants, the outcomes were comparable with other subjects. CONCLUSION: ABI surgery involves frequent anatomical variations surrounding the lateral recess which makes the positioning of the auditory prosthesis difficult. Variants during the surgery can make the placement of ABI electrodes difficult, but promising results were seen all the implantees.

The Effect of National Pneumococcal Vaccination Program on Incidence of Postmeningitis Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Current Treatment Modalities.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of the national pneumococcal vaccination program on postmeningitis sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 2751 patients (2615 cochlear implantation and 136 auditory brainstem implantation) who underwent cochlear implantation (CI) and auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) at a tertiary referral hospital otolaryngology clinic were retrospectively analyzed. One hundred sixteen patients with a history of meningitis were included in the study. Patients were evaluated for their age at the time of surgery, gender, computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, implant type, side, and incidence before and after the vaccination program. RESULTS: When patients with cochlear implants or ABI were examined, the incidence of meningitis-induced hearing loss was 6.2% in the pre-vaccination period and 0.6% in the post-vaccination period. There is a significant difference between them when compared by chi-square test (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The most important finding of the present study is the dramatic decrease in the number of CI and ABI surgeries performed in patients with SNHL due to meningitis. This shows the effectivity of pneumococcal vaccination in this special group of patients. If total ossification is detected on CT of patients with postmeningitis, ABI should be preferred to CI.