Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 99
Filter
2.
Int J Legal Med ; 135(5): 2073-2079, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33709210

ABSTRACT

Working with the dead is a very specific kind of work. Although a dignified handling of the corpses is demanded by the legislator and by the general public, neither the legal status of the corpse is undisputed nor is it obvious what a dignified handling of the deceased should consist of. In our hypothesis generating pilot study, we asked which concrete considerations are involved in daily practice of forensic specialists. We used an online questionnaire (invitations via e-mail) consisting of questions with single choice, multiple choice, and free text entries. The answers to single or multiple choice questions were displayed in pivot tables. The data was thus summarized, viewed, descriptively analyzed, and displayed together with the free text answers. 84.54% of the physicians and 100% of the autopsy assistants stated that considerations concerning the dignity of the deceased should play a role in daily autopsy practice. 45.87% stated that the conditions surrounding the autopsy need improvement to be ethically suitable. The analysis of the survey's results was based on Robert Audi's ethics, according to which three aspects need to be lightened in order to evaluate the conduct of a person morally: the actions, the motivation, and the way in which the actions are carried out. This systematization helps to identify the need for improvement and to make the vague demands for a dignified handling of corpses more concrete.


Subject(s)
Autopsy/ethics , Cadaver , Forensic Medicine/ethics , Respect , Ethicists , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
PLoS One ; 15(12): e0242574, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33315918

ABSTRACT

Establishing the cause of death (CoD) is critical to better understanding health and prioritizing health investments, however the use of full post-mortem examination is rare in most low and middle-income counties for multiple reasons. The use of minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) approaches, such as needle biopsies, presents an alternate means to assess CoD. In order to understand the feasibility and acceptability of MIA among communities in western Kenya, we conducted focus groups and in-depth interviews with next-of-kin of recently deceased persons, community leaders and health care workers in Siaya and Kisumu counties. Results suggest two conceptual framework can be drawn, one with facilitating factors for acceptance of MIA due to the ability to satisfy immediate needs related to interest in learning CoD or protecting social status and honoring the deceased), and one framework covering barriers to acceptance of MIA, for reasons relating to the failure to serve an existing need, and/or the exacerbation of an already difficult time.


Subject(s)
Autopsy/ethics , Biopsy, Needle/psychology , Cause of Death , Adult , Autopsy/methods , Biopsy, Needle/ethics , Feasibility Studies , Female , Focus Groups , Health Personnel/psychology , Humans , Kenya , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Pediatrics ; 146(3)2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32817267

ABSTRACT

In rare circumstances, children who have suffered traumatic brain injury from child abuse are declared dead by neurologic criteria and are eligible to donate organs. When the parents are the suspected abusers, there can be confusion about who has the legal right to authorize organ donation. Furthermore, organ donation may interfere with the collection of forensic evidence that is necessary to evaluate the abuse. Under those circumstances, particularly in the context of a child homicide investigation, the goals of organ donation and collection and preservation of critical forensic evidence may seem mutually exclusive. In this Ethics Rounds, we discuss such a case and suggest ways to resolve the apparent conflicts between the desire to procure organs for donation and the need to thoroughly evaluate the evidence of abuse.


Subject(s)
Child Abuse/ethics , Forensic Medicine/ethics , Homicide/ethics , Parental Consent/ethics , Tissue Donors/ethics , Tissue and Organ Procurement/ethics , Autopsy/ethics , Bioethical Issues , Child Abuse/legislation & jurisprudence , Child, Preschool , Family , Forensic Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , Homicide/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Male , Parental Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Parents , Shaken Baby Syndrome/etiology , Tissue Donors/legislation & jurisprudence , Tissue and Organ Procurement/legislation & jurisprudence
5.
Hum. pathol ; 85: 184-193, Mar. 2019. tab
Article in English | RSDM | ID: biblio-1530872

ABSTRACT

Embora o diagnóstico de autópsia inclua rotineiramente uma avaliação completa de todos os resultados patológicos disponíveis e também de qualquer dado clínico disponível, a contribuição dessas informações clínicas para o rendimento diagnóstico da autópsia não foi analisada. Nosso objetivo foi determinar em que medida o uso de dados clínicos melhora a acurácia diagnóstica da autópsia diagnóstica completa (ACD) e da autópsia minimamente invasiva (MIA), um procedimento patológico simplificado post-mortem projetado para locais de baixa renda. Um total de 264 procedimentos acoplados MIA e CDA (112 adultos, 57 mortes maternas, 54 crianças e 41 neonatos) foram realizados no Hospital de Maputo, Moçambique. Comparamos os diagnósticos obtidos pelo MIA cego para dados clínicos (MIAb), o MIA adicionando a informação clínica (MIAc) e o CDA cego para informação clínica (CDAb), com os resultados do padrão-ouro, o CDA com dados clínicos, comparando a Classificação Internacional de Doenças, códigos da Décima Revisão e as principais classes diagnósticas obtidas com cada estratégia de avaliação (MIAb, MIAc, CDAb, CDAc). Os dados clínicos aumentaram a coincidência diagnóstica com o MIAb com o padrão-ouro em 30 (11%) de 264 casos e modificaram o diagnóstico CDAb em 20 (8%) de 264 casos. O aumento da concordância entre MIAb e MIAc com o padrão-ouro foi significativo nos óbitos neonatais (κ aumentando de 0,404 para 0,618, P = .0271), adultos (κ aumentando de 0,732 para 0,813, P = .0221) e maternos (κ aumentando de 0,485 para 0,836, 0.; P < .0001). Em conclusão, o uso de informações clínicas aumenta a precisão do MIA e do CDA e pode fortalecer o desempenho do MIA em ambientes com recursos limitados.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Young Adult , Autopsy/methods , Death , Autopsy/statistics & numerical data , Autopsy/ethics , Maternal Death , Dimensional Measurement Accuracy , Perinatal Death , Mozambique
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 69(6): 1063-1067, 2019 08 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30715211

ABSTRACT

The inability to sample deep-tissue reservoirs in individuals living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has greatly hindered accurate estimates of viral reservoir size and distribution. Animal models and collection of tissues during autopsies of HIV-positive individuals are 2 proposed solutions to this problem. Each, however, has its limitations. In this Viewpoint, we argue that tissue donation following medical assistance in death (MAiD) will form an invaluable resource for the characterization of the viral reservoir in the context of current HIV cure research. In support, we discuss a recent instance in which an individual living with HIV chose to donate their body/tissues to HIV research prior to undergoing MAiD at our institution. Going forward, we hope this will help provide support to individuals in their decisions around tissue donation following MAiD, while highlighting how healthcare providers, by complying with such wishes, can affect patient satisfaction in the last days of life.


Subject(s)
Autopsy , Biomedical Research , HIV Infections/virology , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Autopsy/ethics , Biomedical Research/ethics , Disease Reservoirs , HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/transmission , Humans , Organ Specificity , Tissue and Organ Procurement/ethics , Viral Load
7.
BMC Med Ethics ; 19(1): 83, 2018 10 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30342507

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The U.S. National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) have a new research priority: inclusion of terminally ill persons living with HIV (PLWHIV) in HIV cure-related research. For example, the Last Gift is a clinical research study at the University of California San Diego (UCSD) for PLWHIV who have a terminal illness, with a prognosis of less than 6 months. DISCUSSION: As end-of-life (EOL) HIV cure research is relatively new, the scientific community has a timely opportunity to examine the related ethical challenges. Following an extensive review of the EOL and HIV cure research ethics literature, combined with deliberation from various stakeholders (biomedical researchers, PLWHIV, bioethicists, and socio-behavioral scientists) and our experience with the Last Gift study to date, we outline considerations to ensure that such research with terminally ill PLWHIV remains ethical, focusing on five topics: 1) protecting autonomy through informed consent, 2) avoiding exploitation and fostering altruism, 3) maintaining a favorable benefits/risks balance, 4) safeguarding against vulnerability through patient-participant centeredness, and 5) ensuring the acceptance of next-of-kin/loved ones and community stakeholders. CONCLUSION: EOL HIV cure-related research can be performed ethically and effectively by anticipating key issues that may arise. While not unique to the fields of EOL or HIV cure-related research, the considerations highlighted can help us support a new research approach. We must honor the lives of PLWHIV whose involvement in research can provide the knowledge needed to achieve the dream of making HIV infection curable.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/ethics , HIV Infections/therapy , Terminal Care/ethics , Altruism , Autopsy/ethics , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics , Personal Autonomy
8.
Pathologe ; 38(5): 402-406, 2017 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28776144

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ethics consultations in a clinical setting can be challenging, specifically with respect to limiting therapeutic interventions in terminally ill patients. Some decisions will even be controversial. OBJECTIVE: Can a clinical autopsy be used to confirm the recommendations given by the ethics committee, i. e. limitation of therapy to palliative care? MATERIAL AND METHODS: We report an exemplary case of a patient with endocarditis and subsequent septic cerebral infarction. During treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) two ethics consultations were held. Both times the patient' s clinical condition and prognosis were controversially discussed. The patient died after a recommendation had been given for supportive care. The subsequent autopsy, which is described in detail, confirmed a fatal set of symptoms with extensive destruction of the heart and disseminated brain infarcts. CONCLUSION: Clinical autopsies are crucial for an objective description of diseases and can corroborate the decision to limit therapeutic intervention in end of life care. It is a valuable tool in evaluating the quality of decision making in ethics counseling.


Subject(s)
Autopsy/ethics , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Ethics, Medical , Abscess/pathology , Brain/pathology , Cause of Death , Cerebral Infarction/pathology , Endocarditis, Bacterial/pathology , Ethics Committees, Clinical , Germany , Heart Failure/pathology , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intersectoral Collaboration , Intracranial Embolism/pathology , Male , Mitral Valve/pathology , Myocardium/pathology , Sepsis/pathology , Staphylococcal Infections/pathology , Withholding Treatment/ethics
9.
Pathologe ; 38(5): 396-401, 2017 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28779216

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Autopsy quotas in Germany are persistently low. By way of providing an explanation, the (ethical) reservations of the general population against autopsies are presented. OBJECTIVE: Normative assessment of clinical autopsies, elaboration of ethically relevant arguments for and against autopsies and review of the suspected reservations of the general population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Reanalysis of the literature, review of qualitative and quantitative studies on the subject field and discussion of the verified ethical argumentation figures. RESULTS: Historical prejudices (e.g. recruitment practice, popular belief and religious reservations) have long been inhibiting the acceptance of clinical autopsies. The current discussion on clinical autopsy is often focused on normative arguments and while autopsy critics primarily argue from an individual ethical perspective, autopsy advocates primarily argue from a social ethics viewpoint. Quantitative studies, however, prove that the majority of the population today has no (ethical) reservations against autopsies. CONCLUSION: Although most reasons for the persistently low autopsy rate are primarily structural and motivational, some normative implications relating to these aspects remain.


Subject(s)
Autopsy/ethics , Ethics, Medical , Autopsy/statistics & numerical data , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Germany , Humans , Prejudice/ethics , Public Opinion , Qualitative Research , Religion and Medicine
11.
Sci Eng Ethics ; 23(1): 321-322, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26869283

ABSTRACT

Consented autopsy is almost non-existent in the Middle-East where established social and cultural beliefs regarding the procedure might discourage family members from requesting a consented autopsy. Evidence suggests that new information is obtained from consented autopsies. It would not be in the best interest of medicine if social and cultural misconceptions succeed in erasing the existence of consented autopsies entirely.


Subject(s)
Autopsy/ethics , Autopsy/statistics & numerical data , Culture , Humans , Middle East
12.
AMA J Ethics ; 18(8): 771-8, 2016 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27550560

ABSTRACT

When a hospitalization ends in death, a request for an autopsy can lead to an emotionally charged encounter between a physician and the deceased patient's family. A case is presented in which a cardiac surgeon, believing he might have made a mistake, requests an autopsy, but members of the deceased patient's family believe that she would not have wanted an autopsy performed. A central question discussed in this commentary is whether and when consent for autopsy is necessary. We discuss two theoretical frameworks that support differing views on this question. Beyond engaging this philosophical discussion, we also highlight a practical approach to discussing an autopsy with a grieving family by using the case presented.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Death , Autopsy/ethics , Death , Ethics, Medical , Family , Informed Consent/ethics , Adult , Female , Humans
13.
AMA J Ethics ; 18(8): 833-8, 2016 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27550568

ABSTRACT

Understanding the decline in the autopsy rate can be furthered through analysis of Foucault's idea of the medical gaze and the ancient Greek idea of theoria. The medical gaze has shifted over time from the surface of the body to the inner organs to the cellular and subcellular levels. Physicians and loved ones of the deceased person are not likely to "gaze" at the same levels. Patients' loved ones might not theorize as physicians do; they have different interests, which suggest the need for more attention to informed consent for autopsies. Responding to this need should take priority over efforts to increase the autopsy rate, and it can also be seen as an opportunity to improve autopsy and autopsy consent practices.


Subject(s)
Attitude , Autopsy , Informed Consent , Professional-Family Relations , Autopsy/ethics , Ethics, Medical , Humans , Informed Consent/ethics
15.
Soc Sci Med ; 163: 1-9, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27376593

ABSTRACT

Verbal autopsy (VA) methods usually involve an interview with a recently bereaved individual to ascertain the most probable cause of death when a person dies outside of a hospital and/or did not receive a reliable death certificate. A number of concerns have arisen around the ethical and social implications of the use of these methods. In this paper we examine these concerns, looking specifically at the cultural factors surrounding death and mourning in Papua New Guinea, and the potential for VA interviews to cause emotional distress in both the bereaved respondent and the VA fieldworker. Thirty one semi-structured interviews with VA respondents, the VA team and community relations officers as well as observations in the field and team discussions were conducted between June 2013 and August 2014. While our findings reveal that VA participants were often moved to cry and feel sad, they also expressed a number of ways they benefited from the process, and indeed welcomed longer transactions with the VA interviewers. Significantly, this paper highlights the ways in which VA interviewers, who have hitherto been largely neglected in the literature, navigate transactions with the participants and make everyday decisions about their relationships with them in order to ensure that they and VA interviews are accepted by the community. The role of the VA fieldworker should be more carefully considered, as should the implications for training and institutional support that follow.


Subject(s)
Autopsy/ethics , Cause of Death , Health Personnel/psychology , Interpersonal Relations , Autopsy/methods , Bereavement , Catharsis , Family/psychology , Humans , Papua New Guinea , Qualitative Research
16.
Soc Sci Med ; 161: 100-8, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27261534

ABSTRACT

Dissection has held a privileged position in medical education although the professional values it inculcates have been subject to intense debate. Claims vary from it generating a dehumanising level of emotional detachment, to promotion of rational and dispassionate decision-making, even to being a positive vehicle for ethical education. Social scientists have positioned dissection as a critical experience in the emotional socialisation of medical students. However, curricular revision has provoked debate about the style and quantity of anatomy teaching thus threatening this 'rite of passage' of medical students. Consequently, some UK medical schools do not employ dissection at all. In its place, observation of post-mortem examinations - a long established, if underutilised, practice - has re-emerged in an attempt to recoup aspects of anatomical knowledge that are arguably lost when dissection is omitted. Bodies for post-mortem examinations and bodies for dissection, however, have striking differences, meaning that post-mortem examinations and dissection cannot be considered comparable opportunities to learn anatomy. In this article, we explore the distinctions between dissection and post-mortem examinations. In particular, we focus on the absence of a discourse of consent, concerns about bodily integrity, how the body's shifting ontology, between object and person, disrupts students' attempts to distance themselves, and how the observation of post-mortem examinations features in the emotional socialisation of medical students.


Subject(s)
Autopsy/ethics , Socialization , Students, Medical/psychology , Teaching/psychology , Adult , Cadaver , Curriculum/standards , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Learning , Male , United Kingdom
17.
J Law Med Ethics ; 44(2): 309-18, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27338606

ABSTRACT

There is a national movement supporting the retention and use of bio-specimens from deceased individuals for the purpose of genetic testing. This manuscript discusses the significance of postmortem genetic testing in the context of death determination by medical examiners (i.e., public molecular autopsies). We highlight distinctive concerns that are raised in the areas of consent, confidentiality, and return of results when genetic testing is performed as part of a public molecular autopsy. We believe our manuscript will contribute to the development of a robust ethical and legal framework for genetic testing in this context.


Subject(s)
Autopsy/ethics , Coroners and Medical Examiners , Genetic Testing , Cadaver , Confidentiality , Death , Humans , Informed Consent
18.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol ; 37(1): 29-31, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26505228

ABSTRACT

Religious beliefs and cultures have influenced treatment of dead bodies in different ways by nations throughout history, and attitudes toward the deceased individuals have changed across time and so has the role and mechanism of autopsy. Islam has been a part of Europe for a long time; therefore, we would like to emphasize the important issues for Muslims and their families regarding death, autopsy, and funeral and to describe international perspectives of Muslim autopsies. Muslims have expressed their views on autopsy publically and internationally, and there have been claims of violation of the deceased, delays in burial, and nonconsideration of their religious beliefs. In this article, we aim to increase awareness and understanding of doctors about the religious and ethical issues important to Muslims and their families, so that appropriate considerations may be made where possible with regard to respectful treatment of deceased loved ones to decrease tensions presently being faced. Forensic medicine doctors could assist by undertaking autopsy without delay, in a private room by those of the same sex, and covering parts of the body not being worked on at that time.


Subject(s)
Autopsy/methods , Islam , Autopsy/ethics , Autopsy/standards , Burial/ethics , Burial/legislation & jurisprudence , Burial/methods , Funeral Rites/psychology , Humans , Islam/psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...