The axillary vein puncture for implantable cardiac defibrillator implantation: 14 years of experience. Analysis of the results.

BACKGROUND: Axillary vein puncture (AVP) is a valid alternative to Subclavan vein puncture for leads insertion in cardiac implantable electronic device implantation, that may reduce acute and delayed complications. Very few data are available about ICD recipients. A simplified AVP technique is described. METHODS: All the patients who consecutively underwent "de novo" ICD implantation, from March 2006 to December 2020 at the University of Verona, were considered. Leads insertion was routinely performed through an AVP, according to a simplified technique. Outcome and complications have been retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 1711 consecutive patients. Out of 1711 patients, 38 (2.2%) were excluded because they were implanted with Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead. Out of 1673 ICD implantations, 963 (57.6%) were ICD plus cardiac resynchronization therapy, 434 (25.9%) were dual-chamber defibrillators, and 276 (16.5%) were single-chamber defibrillators, for a total of 3879 implanted leads. The AVP success rate was 99.4%. Acute complications occurred in 7/1673 (0.42%) patients. Lead failure (LF) occurred in 20/1673 (1.19%) patients. Comparing the group of patients with lead failure with the group without LF, the presence of three leads inside the vein was significantly associated with LF, and the multivariate analysis confirmed three leads in place as an independent predictor of LF. CONCLUSION: AVP, according to our simplified technique, is safe, effective, has a high success rate, and a very low complication rate. The incidence of LF was exceptionally low. The advantages of AVP are maintained over time in a population of ICD recipients.

Case series of peripherally inserted central catheter insertion in young children: A new approach to the axillary vein.

BACKGROUND: We have developed a new approach for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) insertion that we think has several advantages, including ease of insertion, access to a larger vein and patient comfort. METHODS: In this case series report, the first 19 cases were audited. RESULTS: All PICCs were inserted without complications; 17 on the first attempt. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the novel approach to the axillary vein for PICC insertion is feasible and appears to be safe when performed by an experienced operator.

Axillary vein as an alternative venous access site for VV-ECMO cannulation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous axillary vein cannulation can reduce cannulation failure and mechanical complications, is as safe and effective as internal jugular vein cannulation, and is superior to subclavian vein cannulation using landmark technique. As far, reports of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) with percutaneous axillary vein cannulation are rare. CASE PRESENTATION: A 64-year-old man presenting with dyspnea and chest tightness after aspirating sewage was admitted to the emergency department. Computed tomography (CT) showed diffuse exudation of both lungs and arterial blood gas analysis showed an oxygenation index of 86. He was diagnosed with aspiration pneumonia-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and intubated for deteriorated oxygenation. Despite the combination therapy of protective mechanical ventilation and prone position, the patient's oxygenation deteriorated further, accompanied with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, which indicated the requirement of support with VV-ECMO. However, vascular ultrasound detected multiple thrombus within bilateral internal jugular veins. As an alternative, right axillary vein was chosen as the access site of return cannula. Subsequently, femoral-axillary VV-ECMO was successfully implemented under the ultrasound guidance, and the patient's oxygenation was significantly improved. Unfortunately, the patient died of hyperkalemia-induced ventricular fibrillation after 36 h of VV-ECMO running. Despite the poor prognosis, the blood flow during ECMO run was stable, and we observed no bleeding complication, vascular injury, or venous return disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary vein is a feasible alternative access site of return cannula for VV-ECMO if internal jugular vein access were unavailable.

Strategies to Mitigate Bleeding in Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Setting of an Arteriovenous Fistula: A Report of 3 Cases.

CASE: Arteriovenous (AV) fistula in the ipsilateral extremity for hemodialysis presents unique challenges during shoulder arthroplasty. We describe 3 cases of shoulder arthroplasty performed through a deltopectoral approach on the ipsilateral side of an AV fistula. In all cases, the cephalic vein was found to be arterialized with increased diameter and thickness. All procedures were successfully performed without injury to the arterialized cephalic vein. CONCLUSION: This report highlighted strategies to mitigate catastrophic bleeding from an arterialized cephalic vein during shoulder arthroplasty, which includes preoperative cross-matching, expeditious vascular surgery availability, meticulous surgical dissection, and careful retractor placement.

Caudal fluoroscopic guidance for the insertion of transvenous pacing leads.

BACKGROUND: Pneumothorax is a well-recognized complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) insertion. While AP fluoroscopy alone is the most commonly imaging technique for subclavian or axillary access, caudal fluoroscopy (angle 40°) is routinely used at our institution. The caudal view provides additional separation of the first rib and clavicle and may reduce the risk of pneumothorax. We assessed outcomes at our institution of AP and caudal fluoroscopic guided pacing lead insertion. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing transvenous lead insertion for pacemakers, defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices between 2011 and 2023. Both de novo and lead replacement/upgrade procedures were included. Data were extracted from operative, radiology, and discharge reports. All patients underwent postprocedure chest radiography. RESULTS: Three thousand two hundred fifty-two patients underwent insertion of pacing leads between February 2011 and March 2023. Mean age was 71.1 years (range 16-102) and 66.7% were male. Most (n = 2536; 78.0%) procedures used caudal guidance to obtain venous access, while 716 (22.0%) procedures used AP guidance alone. Pneumothoraxes occurred in five (0.2%) patients in the caudal group and five (0.7%) patients in the AP group (p = .03). Subclavian contrast venography was performed less frequently in the caudal group (26.2% vs. 42.7%, p < .01). CONCLUSION: Caudal fluoroscopy for axillary/subclavian access is associated with a lower rate of pneumothorax and contrast venography compared with an AP approach.

Ultrasound-Guided Venous Axillary Access Versus Standard Fluoroscopic Technique for Cardiac Lead Implantation: ZEROFLUOROAXI Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Axillary vein puncture (AVP) and cephalic vein surgical cutdown are recommended in international guidelines because of their low risk of pneumothorax and chronic lead complications. Directly visualizing and puncturing the axillary vein under ultrasound guidance reduces radiation exposure, provides direct needle visualization, and lowers periprocedural complications. Our hypothesis is that ultrasound-guided axillary access is safer and more feasible than the standard fluoroscopic technique. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided axillary venous access during cardiac lead implantation for pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantations. METHODS: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to either axillary venous access under fluoroscopic guidance or ultrasound-guided axillary venous access. The composite outcome, including pneumothorax, hemothorax, inadvertent arterial puncture, pocket hematoma, pocket infection, lead dislodgement, and death, was evaluated 30 days after implantation. RESULTS: We randomized 270 patients into 2 groups: the standard group for fluoroguided AVP (n = 134) and the experimental group for ultrasound-guided AVP (n = 136). No disparities in baseline characteristics were observed between the groups. The median age of the patients was 81 years, with women comprising 41% of the population. The majority of patients received single- and dual-chamber PMs (87% vs 88%; P = 1.00), and slightly over 10% in both groups received ICDs (13% vs 12%; P = 0.85). In total, we placed 357 leads in PMs and 48 leads in ICDs. Among these, 295 leads were inserted via axillary vein access and 110 via cephalic vein access. Notably, the subclavian vein was never used as a vascular access. The composite outcome was lower in the ultrasound group according to intention-to-treat analysis (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.31-0.99; P = 0.034). The main difference within the composite outcome was the lower incidence of inadvertent axillary arterial puncture in the experimental group (17% vs 6%; P = 0.004). The ultrasound group also exhibited lower total procedural x-ray exposure (10,344 µGy × cm2 vs 7,119 µGy × cm2; P = 0.002) while achieving the same rate of success at the first attempt (61% vs 69%; P = 0.375). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided AVP is safer than the fluoroscopy-guided approach because it achieves the same rate of acute success while maintaining low total procedural radiation exposure. Ultrasound AVP should be considered the optimal venous access method for cardiac lead implantation. (Ultrasound Guided Axillary Access vs Standard Fluoroscopic Technique for Cardiac Lead Implantation [ZEROFLUOROAXI]; NCT05101720).

Infraclavicular, Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Approach to the Axillary Artery for Arterial Catheter Placement: A Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether an ultrasound-guided infraclavicular cannulation of the axillary artery is noninferior to an ultrasound-guided cannulation of the common femoral artery for arterial catheter placement in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Prospective, investigator-initiated, noninferiority randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University-affiliated ICU in Poland. PATIENTS: Mechanically ventilated patients with indications for arterial catheter placement. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned into two groups. In the axillary group (A group), an ultrasound-guided infraclavicular, in-plane cannulation of the axillary artery was performed. In the femoral group (F group), an ultrasound-guided, out-of-plane cannulation of the common femoral artery was performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 1,079 mechanically ventilated patients were screened, of whom 110 were randomized. The main outcome was the cannulation success rate. The secondary outcomes included the artery puncture success rate, the first-pass success rate, number of attempts required to puncture, and the rate of early mechanical complications. The cannulation success rate in the A group and F group was 96.4% and 96.3%, respectively. The lower limit of 95% CI for the difference in cannulation success rate was above the prespecified noninferiority margin of-7% demonstrating noninferiority of infraclavicular approach. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of puncture success rate and the rate of early mechanical complications. CONCLUSIONS: An ultrasound-guided infraclavicular cannulation of the axillary artery is noninferior to the cannulation of the common femoral artery in terms of procedure success rate. We found no significant differences in early mechanical complications between the groups.

Prevención quirúrgica del linfedema del miembro superior relacionado con la cirugía axilar en el cáncer de mama / Surgical prevention of upper limb lymphoedema related to axillary surgery in breast cancer

El linfedema (LE) es una de las secuelas más graves e incapacitantes secundarias al tratamiento en el cáncer de mama debido a las limitaciones funcionales, implicaciones estéticas y riesgo de infección que conlleva. Se estima que entre el 29 y 39% de las pacientes que se sujetan a una linfadenectomía axilar desarrollan LE, frente a entre 5 y 7% de los que casos que se realiza una biopsia selectiva de ganglio centinela. Para intentar reducir su incidencia, se ha desarrollado el mapeo axilar inverso. El objetivo de esta técnica es diferenciar las distintas vías de drenaje linfático axilar y del brazo mediante la inyección de un colorante azul en el brazo ipsilateral, para poder respetar los linfáticos que drenan la extremidad superior durante la disección linfática axilar. Otra posibilidad es usar verde de indocianina y así combinar el procedimiento de mapeo axilar inverso con el trazador dual estándar en la biopsia selectiva de ganglio centinela. Gracias a la microcirugía se han desarrollado técnicas como la anastomosis linfático-venosa para la prevención secundaria de LE, de manera que los linfáticos aferentes del brazo se pueden redirigir a ramas colaterales de la vena axilar para restaurar el flujo linfático fisiológico. Este procedimiento es más eficaz en las etapas precoces de LE. En los últimos años se está llevando a cabo la técnica LYMPHA, que consiste en anastomosar los vasos linfáticos del brazo a una rama colateral de la vena axilar en el momento de la disección ganglionar. Esta se ha demostrado útil en la prevención primaria de LE y en la reducción de complicaciones tempranas. (AU)

Lymphoedema (LE) is one of the most serious and disabling sequelae secondary to breast cancer treatment due to the functional limitations, cosmetic implications and risk of infection it entails. Twenty-nine to thirty-nine per cent of patients who undergo axillary lymphadenectomy (AL) are estimated to develop LE, compared to 5-7% in those who undergo selective sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). In an attempt to reduce its incidence, Reverse Axillary Mapping (ARM) has been developed. The aim of this technique is to differentiate the different axillary and arm lymphatic drainage pathways by injecting a blue dye into the ipsilateral arm, in order to respect the lymphatics draining the upper extremity during axillary lymphatic dissection. Another possibility is to use indocyanine green and thus combine the ARM procedure with the standard dual tracer in SLNB. Thanks to microsurgery, techniques such as lymphatic-venous anastomosis (LVA) have been developed for secondary prevention of lymphoedema, so that afferent lymphatics in the arm can be redirected to collateral branches of the axillary vein to restore physiological lymphatic flow. In recent years, the LYMPHA technique, which involves anastomosing the lymphatic vessels of the arm to a collateral branch of the axillary vein at the time of lymph node dissection, has been implemented. This has been shown to be useful in the primary prevention of LE and in the reduction of early complications. (AU)

Can subclavian/infraclavicular axillary vein collapsibility index predict spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in cesarean-section operations?

OBJECTIVE: Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension (SAIH) is relatively common in pregnant women and has serious maternal and fetal side effects. In patients who are hypovolemic during spinal anesthesia, there may be a significant decrease in blood pressure caused by the decrease in preload. Subclavian vein sonography is a useful method for evaluating preoperative intravascular volume status. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the pre-operative subclavian vein or infraclavicular axillary vein (SCV-AV) collapsibility index for predicting SAIH in cesarean-section (C-section). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 82 women undergoing elective C-sections were recruited. Sonographic evaluation of SCV-AV was assessed before spinal anesthesia. After spinal anesthesia, changes in blood pressure were noted. The main outcome was the association between the SCV-AV measurements (diameter and collapsibility index) and SAIH. RESULTS: Hypotension developed in 53 (64%) patients after spinal anesthesia. The collapsibility index of the SCV-AV during spontaneous breathing and deep inspirium was not a significant predictor of a decrease in mean blood pressure (MBP) after spinal anesthesia (p<0.979, p<0.380). CONCLUSIONS: It was found that the SCV-AV collapsibility index is not a predictor of SAIH in pregnant women undergoing elective C-sections.

Association of infraclavicular axillary vein diameter and collapsibility index with general anesthesia-induced hypotension in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: The collapse index of inferior Vena Cava (IVC) and its diameter are important predictive tools for fluid responsiveness in patients, especially critically ones. The collapsibility of infraclavicular axillary vein (AXV) can be used as an alternative to the collapsibility of IVC (IVC-CI) to assess the patient's blood volume. METHODS: A total of 188 elderly patients aged between 65 and 85 years were recruited for gastrointestinal surgery under general anesthesia. Ultrasound measurements AXV and IVC were performed before induction of general anesthesia. Patients were grouped in accordance to the hypotension after induction. ROC curves were used to analyze the predictive value of ultrasound measurements of AXV and IVC for hypotension after induction of anesthesia. Pearson linear correlation was used to assess the correlation of ultrasound measurements and decrease in mean arterial blood pressure (MAP). RESULTS: The maximum diameter of AXV(dAXVmax) and the maximum diameter of IVC (dIVCmax) were not related to the percentage decrease in MAP; the collapsibility of AXV (AXV-CI) and IVC-CI were positively correlated with MAP changes (correlation coefficients:0.475, 0.577, respectively, p < 0.001). The areas under the curve (AUC) was 0.824 (0.759-0.889) for AXV-CI, and 0.874 (0.820-0.928) for IVC-CI. The optimal threshold for AXV-CI was 31.25% (sensitivity 71.7%, specificity 90.1%), while for IVC-CI was 36.60% (sensitivity 85.9%, specificity 79.0%). Hypotension and down-regulation of MAP during induction can be accurately predicted by AXV-Cl after correction for confounding variables. CONCLUSION: Infraclavicular axillary vein diameter has no significant correlation with postanesthesia hypotension, whereas AXV-CI may predict postanesthesia hypotension during gastrointestinal surgery of the elderly. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry of China on 05/06/2022 (ChiCTR2200060596).

Intra-pocket ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture vs. cephalic vein cutdown for cardiac electronic device implantation: the ACCESS trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intra-pocket ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture (IPUS-AVP) for venous access in implantation of transvenous cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is uncommon due to the lack of clinical evidence supporting this technique. This study investigated the efficacy and early complications of IPUS-AVP compared to the standard method using cephalic vein cutdown (CVC) for CIED implantation. METHODS: ACCESS was an investigator-led, interventional, randomized (1:1 ratio), monocentric, controlled superiority trial. A total of 200 patients undergoing CIED implantation were randomized to IPUS-AVP (n = 101) or CVC (n = 99) as a first assigned route. The primary endpoint was the success rate of insertion of all leads using the first assigned venous access technique. The secondary endpoints were time to venous access, total procedure duration, fluoroscopy time, X-ray exposure, and complications. Complications were monitored during a follow-up period of three months after procedure. RESULTS: IPUS-AVP was significantly superior to CVC for the primary endpoint with 100 (99.0%) vs. 86 (86.9%) procedural successes (P = .001). Cephalic vein cutdown followed by subclavian vein puncture was successful in a total of 95 (96.0%) patients, P = .21 vs. IPUS-AVP. All secondary endpoints were also significantly improved in the IPUS-AVP group with reduction in time to venous access [3.4 vs. 10.6 min, geometric mean ratio (GMR) 0.32 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.28-0.36), P < .001], total procedure duration [33.8 vs. 46.9 min, GMR 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.78), P < .001], fluoroscopy time [2.4 vs. 3.3 min, GMR 0.74 (95% CI 0.63-0.86), P < .001], and X-ray exposure [1083 vs. 1423 mGy.cm², GMR 0.76 (95% CI 0.62-0.93), P = .009]. There was no significant difference in complication rates between groups (P = .68). CONCLUSIONS: IPUS-AVP is superior to CVC in terms of success rate, time to venous access, procedure duration, and radiation exposure. Complication rates were similar between the two groups. Intra-pocket ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture should be a recommended venous access technique for CIED implantation.

Exercise-induced deep vein thrombosis in the subclavian vein in an elite female athlete.

An adolescent female presented to the emergency room with pain, swelling and a palpable lump in the right axilla following activity on a rowing ergometer. The differential diagnosis at the time of presentation was deep vein thrombosis, mass compression and cellulitis. An ultrasound scan revealed an occlusive thrombus of the right axillary and subclavian veins, basilic vein and proximal cephalic vein. The patient underwent pharmacomechanical thrombolysis followed by catheter-directed thrombolysis. Dynamic venogram testing revealed venous thoracic outlet syndrome (VTOS) and a transaxillary first rib resection was performed to decompress the costoclavicular space. Genetic testing revealed the patient was heterozygous for factor V Leiden. Two rounds of balloon dilatation plasty were performed to relieve recurring symptoms due to scarring and persisting compression, 1 and 3 years post rib resection. After extensive shared decision-making, the patient returned to sport, reporting only intermittent symptoms of post-thrombotic syndrome. This case sheds light on the importance of early diagnosis of VTOS for successful return to sport.

[Venous access routes for cardiac implantable electronic devices]. / Venöse Zugangswege in der kardialen Devicetherapie.

Various venous access routes in the region of the clavicle are available for cardiac device treatment. After many years of choosing access via the subclavian vein, current data explicitly show that lateral approaches such as preparation of the cephalic vein or puncture of the axillary vein are clearly superior in terms of probe durability and risk of complications. This article describes the preparation and performance of the various access techniques and is intended to provide a practical guide for the work in cardiac pacemaker operations. This work continues a series of articles designed for advanced training in specialized rhythmology.

Axillary vein puncture versus cephalic vein cutdown for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: A meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Cephalic vein cutdown (CVC) and axillary vein puncture (AVP) are both recommended for transvenous implantation of leads for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Nonetheless, it is still debated which of the two techniques has a better safety and efficacy profile. METHODS: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases up to September 5, 2022, for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of AVP and CVC reporting at least one clinical outcome of interest. The primary endpoints were acute procedural success and overall complications. The effect size was estimated using a random-effect model as risk ratio (RR) and relative 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Overall, seven studies were included, which enrolled 1771 and 3067 transvenous leads (65.6% [n = 1162] males, average age 73.4 ± 14.3 years). Compared to CVC, AVP showed a significant increase in the primary endpoint (95.7 % vs. 76.1 %; RR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.09-1.40; p = .001) (Figure 1). Total procedural time (mean difference [MD]: -8.25 min; 95% CI: -10.23 to -6.27; p < .0001; I2  = 0%) and venous access time (MD: -6.24 min; 95% CI: -7.01 to -5.47; p < .0001; I2  = 0%) were significantly shorter with AVP compared to CVC. No differences were found between AVP and CVC for incidence overall complications (RR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.28-1.10; p = .09), pneumothorax (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.13-4.0; p = .71), lead failure (RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.23-1.48; p = .26), pocket hematoma/bleeding (RR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.15-2.23; p = .43), device infection (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.14-6.60; p = .96) and fluoroscopy time (MD: -0.24 min; 95% CI: -0.75 to 0.28; p = .36). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggests that AVP may improve procedural success and reduce total procedural time and venous access time compared to CVC.