Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 9.353
Filter
1.
BMJ ; 385: e074962, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830686

ABSTRACT

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy worldwide, with over 470 000 new cases diagnosed each year. Two distinct histological subtypes predominate, and should be considered biologically separate disease entities.1 These subtypes are esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Outcomes remain poor regardless of subtype, with most patients presenting with late stage disease.2 Novel strategies to improve early detection of the respective precursor lesions, squamous dysplasia, and Barrett's esophagus offer the potential to improve outcomes. The introduction of a limited number of biologic agents, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors, is resulting in improvements in the systemic treatment of locally advanced and metastatic esophageal cancer. These developments, coupled with improvements in minimally invasive surgical and endoscopic treatment approaches, as well as adaptive and precision radiotherapy technologies, offer the potential to improve outcomes still further. This review summarizes the latest advances in the diagnosis and management of esophageal cancer, and the developments in understanding of the biology of this disease.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/diagnosis , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Esophagoscopy/methods , Barrett Esophagus/therapy , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/pathology
2.
Methods Cell Biol ; 186: 25-49, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38705603

ABSTRACT

One of the earliest applications of flow cytometry was the measurement of DNA content in cells. This method is based on the ability to stain DNA in a stoichiometric manner (i.e., the amount of stain is directly proportional to the amount of DNA within the cell). For more than 40years, a number of studies have consistently demonstrated the utility of DNA flow cytometry as a potential diagnostic and/or prognostic tool in patients with most epithelial tumors, including pre-invasive lesions (such as dysplasia) in the gastrointestinal tract. However, its availability as a clinical test has been limited to few medical centers due to the requirement for fresh tissue in earlier studies and perceived technical demands. However, more recent studies have successfully utilized formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue to generate high-quality DNA content histograms, demonstrating the feasibility of this methodology. This review summarizes step-by-step methods on how to perform DNA flow cytometry using FFPE tissue and analyze DNA content histograms based on the published consensus guidelines in order to assist in the diagnosis and/or risk stratification of many different epithelial tumors, with particular emphasis on dysplasia associated with Barrett's esophagus and inflammatory bowel disease.


Subject(s)
Flow Cytometry , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , Genomic Instability , Humans , Flow Cytometry/methods , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/genetics , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Genomic Instability/genetics , Precancerous Conditions/genetics , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Tissue Fixation/methods , Paraffin Embedding/methods , DNA/genetics , DNA/analysis , Gastrointestinal Tract/pathology , Gastrointestinal Tract/metabolism , Barrett Esophagus/genetics , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis
3.
BMC Genomics ; 25(1): 471, 2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745153

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Gut microbiota(GM) have been proven associated with lots of gastrointestinal diseases, but its causal relationship with Gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD) and Barrett's esophagus(BE) hasn't been explored. We aimed to uncover the causal relation between GM and GERD/BE and potential mediators by utilizing Mendelian Randomization(MR) analysis. METHODS: Summary statistics of GM(comprising 301 bacteria taxa and 205 metabolism pathways) were extracted from MiBioGen Consortium(N = 18,340) and Dutch Microbiome Project(N = 7,738), GERD and BE from a multitrait meta-analysis(NGERD=602,604, NBE=56,429). Bidirectional two-sample MR analysis and linkage disequilibrium score regression(LDSC) were used to explore the genetic correlation between GM and GERD/BE. Mediation MR analysis was performed for the risk factors of GERD/BE, including Body mass index(BMI), weight, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder(MDD), smoking initiation, alcohol consumption, and dietary intake(including carbohydrate, sugar, fat, protein intake), to detect the potential mediators between GM and GERD/BE. RESULTS: 11 bacterial taxa and 13 metabolism pathways were found associated with GERD, and 18 taxa and 5 pathways exhibited causal relationship with BE. Mediation MR analysis suggested weight and BMI played a crucial role in these relationships. LDSC identified 1 taxon and 4 metabolism pathways related to GERD, and 1 taxon related to BE. Specie Faecalibacterium prausnitzii had a suggestive impact on both GERD(OR = 1.087, 95%CI = 1.01-1.17) and BE(OR = 1.388, 95%CI = 1.03-1.86) and LDSC had determined their correlation. Reverse MR indicated that BE impacted 10 taxa and 4 pathways. CONCLUSIONS: This study established a causal link between gut microbiota and GERD/BE, and identified the probable mediators. It offers new insights into the role of gut microbiota in the development and progression of GERD and BE in the host.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Mendelian Randomization Analysis , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/genetics , Gastroesophageal Reflux/microbiology , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/microbiology , Barrett Esophagus/genetics , Risk Factors , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
4.
Br J Surg ; 111(5)2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736137

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Barrett's oesophagus surveillance places significant burden on endoscopy services yet is vital to detect early cancerous change. Oesophageal cell collection device (OCCD) testing was introduced across Scotland for Barrett's surveillance in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This national pragmatic retrospective study presents the CytoSCOT programme results and evaluates whether OCCD testing is successfully identifying high-risk Barrett's patients requiring urgent endoscopy. METHODS: All patients undergoing OCCD testing for Barrett's surveillance across 11 Scottish health boards over a 32-month period were identified. Patients who underwent endoscopy within 12 months of OCCD test were included. Individual patient records were interrogated to record clinical information and OCCD test result to categorize patients into risk groups. Endoscopic histopathology results were analysed according to risk group and segment length. Patients were deemed high risk if the OCCD test demonstrated atypia and/or p53 positivity. RESULTS: 4204 OCCD tests were performed in 3745 patients: 608 patients underwent endoscopy within 12 months and were included in this analysis. Patients with longer Barrett's segments were significantly more likely to have an abnormal OCCD test. 50/608 patients (8.2%) had high-grade dysplasia or cancer on endoscopic biopsies: this equates to 1.3% of the total group (50/3745). 46/50 patients (92.0%) were deemed high risk, triggering urgent endoscopy: this rose to 100% with insufficient tests removed. There were no cancers diagnosed within 12 months post-OCCD in the low-risk group. CONCLUSION: OCCD testing is an effective triage tool to identify high-risk patients with Barrett's oesophagus requiring further investigation with endoscopy within the real-world setting.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagoscopy , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Esophagoscopy/methods , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , COVID-19/diagnosis , Scotland/epidemiology , Biomarkers/metabolism , Risk Assessment , Esophagus/pathology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Adult
5.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302204, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709808

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a precancerous condition that has the potential to develop into esophageal cancer (EC). Currently, there is a wide range of management options available for individuals at different pathological stages in Barrett's esophagus (BE). However, there is currently a lack of knowledge regarding their comparative efficacy. To address this gap, we conducted a network meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials to examine the comparative effectiveness of all regimens. METHODS: Data extracted from eligible randomized controlled trials were utilized in a Bayesian network meta-analysis to examine the relative effectiveness of BE's treatment regimens and determine their ranking in terms of efficacy. The ranking probability for each regimen was assessed using the surfaces under cumulative ranking values. The outcomes under investigation were complete ablation of BE, neoplastic progression of BE, and complete eradication of dysplasia. RESULTS: We identified twenty-three RCT studies with a total of 1675 participants, and ten different interventions. Regarding complete ablation of non-dysplastic BE, the comparative effectiveness ranking indicated that argon plasma coagulation (APC) was the most effective regimen, with the highest SUCRA value, while surveillance and PPI/H2RA were found to be the least efficacious regimens. For complete ablation of BE with low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, or esophageal cancer, photodynamic therapy (PDT) had the highest SUCRA value of 94.1%, indicating it as the best regimen. Additionally, for complete eradication of dysplasia, SUCRA plots showed a trend in ranking PDT as the highest with a SUCRA value of 91.2%. Finally, for neoplastic progression, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgery were found to perform significantly better than surveillance. The risk of bias assessment revealed that 6 studies had an overall high risk of bias. However, meta-regression with risk of bias as a covariate did not indicate any influence on the model. In terms of the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis evaluation, a high level of confidence was found for all treatment comparisons. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic surveillance alone or PPI/H2RA alone may not be sufficient for managing BE, even in cases of non-dysplastic BE. However, APC has shown excellent efficacy in treating non-dysplastic BE. For cases of BE with low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, or esophageal cancer, PDT may be the optimal intervention as it can induce regression of BE metaplasia and prevent future progression of BE to dysplasia and EC.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Network Meta-Analysis , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/therapy , Barrett Esophagus/surgery , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Bayes Theorem , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Precancerous Conditions/surgery , Precancerous Conditions/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Argon Plasma Coagulation , Disease Progression
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821668

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we studied the potential genotoxic effects of human plasma from healthy volunteers, as well as patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's oesophagus (BO) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) using the oesophageal adenocarcinoma cell line (OE33) and the lymphoblastoid cell line (TK6). Both TK6 and OE33 cells were treated with plasma (10 % volume, replacing foetal bovine serum (FBS) or horse serum (HS)) at different time points of 4 h (for the micronucleus (Mn) assay and the invasion assay) and 24 h (for the cell cycle studies). Plasma-induced effects on DNA damage levels, cell viability and the cell cycle were studied by the micronucleus assay, cytokinesis block proliferation index (CBPI) and flow cytometry respectively. The expression of IL-8 in supernatants of TK6 cells and IFN-ß in OE33 cells was also analysed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Finally, we carried out an assessment of cellular invasion of OE33 cells following plasma treatment. The results of the micronucleus assay confirmed the genotoxicity of direct plasma treatment from some participants through the increase in DNA damage in TK6 cells. Conversely, some individual patient plasma samples reduced background levels of TK6 cell Mn frequency, in an anti-genotoxic fashion. In TK6 cells, (on average) plasma samples from patients with Barrett's oesophagus induced higher micronucleus levels than healthy volunteers (p= 0.0019). There was little difference in Mn induction when using plasma versus serum to treat the cells in vitro. Cell cycle results showed that direct plasma treatment had a marked impact on OE33 cells at 24 h (p=0.0182 for BO and p=0.0320 for OAC) by decreasing the proportion of cells in the S phase, while plasma exposure was less impactful on the cell cycle of TK6 cells. Invasion of OE33 cells was also seen to be non-significantly affected by plasma treatment of OE33 cells. The addition of N-acetyl cysteine NAC in a dose-dependent matter did not alter the formation of Mn in TK6 cells, suggesting that reactive oxygen species (ROS) are not the root cause of plasma's genotoxicity. The concentration of IL-8 in TK6 cells and IFN-ß in OE33 cells was significantly higher in cells treated with OAC-derived plasma than in the untreated negative control. Collectively, our results demonstrate that plasma-specific effects are detectable which helps us better understand some important aspects of the biology of blood-based biomarkers under development.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , DNA Damage , Esophageal Neoplasms , Micronucleus Tests , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Plasma/metabolism , Interleukin-8/metabolism , Interleukin-8/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Cycle/drug effects , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Cell Survival/drug effects , Female , Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective , Interferon-beta , Aged
7.
Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol ; 48(6): 102371, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719146

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of Barrett's esophagus (BE) in France is unknown. However, the management of dysplastic BE in expert centers is recommended and reduces the risk of developing invasive adenocarcinoma. Our aim was to determine the burden of BE patients in the Paris Region. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using the data from electronic medical records from the data warehouse of the 39 Greater Paris public hospitals (Entrepôt de données de santé de l' Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris) for the year 2018, and used natural language processing to search for occurrences of Barrett's esophagus in endoscopy and pathology reports. RESULTS: we observed a 2.2 % prevalence of Barrett's esophagus. Patients with Barrett's esophagus were older, more frequently males, with a hiatal hernia, proton pump inhibitor users, and less frequently infected by H. Pylori. Gastro-esophageal reflux symptoms were not more frequently encountered in Barrett's patients. Eleven percent of patients with Barrett's esophagus had dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. DISCUSSION: Over 200 000 patients with Barrett's esophagus are expected in the Paris Region, of which 11 % harbor dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. This data should be taken into account to tailor healthcare offer in France.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Barrett Esophagus/epidemiology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Paris/epidemiology , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Prevalence , Hernia, Hiatal/epidemiology , Hernia, Hiatal/complications , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiology , Cost of Illness , Esophageal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult
8.
Gastroenterology ; 166(6): 1020-1055, 2024 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763697

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) can be effective in eradicating BE and related neoplasia and has greater risk of harms and resource use than surveillance endoscopy. This clinical practice guideline aims to inform clinicians and patients by providing evidence-based practice recommendations for the use of EET in BE and related neoplasia. METHODS: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients, conducted an evidence review, and used the Evidence-to-Decision Framework to develop recommendations regarding the use of EET in patients with BE under the following scenarios: presence of (1) high-grade dysplasia, (2) low-grade dysplasia, (3) no dysplasia, and (4) choice of stepwise endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or focal EMR plus ablation, and (5) endoscopic submucosal dissection vs EMR. Clinical recommendations were based on the balance between desirable and undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 5 recommendations for the use of EET in BE and related neoplasia. Based on the available evidence, the panel made a strong recommendation in favor of EET in patients with BE high-grade dysplasia and conditional recommendation against EET in BE without dysplasia. The panel made a conditional recommendation in favor of EET in BE low-grade dysplasia; patients with BE low-grade dysplasia who place a higher value on the potential harms and lower value on the benefits (which are uncertain) regarding reduction of esophageal cancer mortality could reasonably select surveillance endoscopy. In patients with visible lesions, a conditional recommendation was made in favor of focal EMR plus ablation over stepwise EMR. In patients with visible neoplastic lesions undergoing resection, the use of either endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection was suggested based on lesion characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: This document provides a comprehensive outline of the indications for EET in the management of BE and related neoplasia. Guidance is also provided regarding the considerations surrounding implementation of EET. Providers should engage in shared decision making based on patient preferences. Limitations and gaps in the evidence are highlighted to guide future research opportunities.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagoscopy , Barrett Esophagus/surgery , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects , Esophagoscopy/standards , Esophagoscopy/adverse effects , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Gastroenterology/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Treatment Outcome , Clinical Decision-Making , Ablation Techniques/adverse effects , Ablation Techniques/standards
9.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 28(4): 337-342, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583881

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The relationship among obesity, bariatric surgery, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is complex, given that some bariatric procedures are thought to be associated with increased incidence of reflux and Barrett's esophagus. Previous bariatric surgery may complicate the use of the stomach as a conduit for esophagectomy. In this study, we presented our experience with patients who developed EAC after bariatric surgery and described the challenges encountered and the techniques used. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of our institutional database to identify all patients at our institution who were treated for EAC after previously undergoing bariatric surgery. RESULTS: In total, 19 patients underwent resection with curative intent for EAC after bariatric surgery, including 10 patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy. The median age at diagnosis of EAC was 63 years; patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy were younger (median age, 56 years). The median time from bariatric surgery to EAC was 7 years. Most patients had a body mass index (BMI) score of >30 kg/m2 at the time of diagnosis of EAC; approximately 40% had class III obesity (BMI score > 40 kg/m2). Six patients (32%) had known Barrett's esophagus before undergoing a reflux-increasing bariatric procedure. Sleeve gastrectomy patients underwent esophagectomy with gastric conduit, colonic interposition, or esophagojejunostomy. Only 1 patient had an anastomotic leak (after esophagojejunostomy). CONCLUSION: Endoscopy should be required both before (for treatment selection) and after all bariatric surgical procedures. Resection of EAC after bariatric surgery requires a highly individualized approach but is safe and feasible.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Bariatric Surgery , Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Obesity, Morbid , Humans , Middle Aged , Barrett Esophagus/etiology , Barrett Esophagus/surgery , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/etiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/etiology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Bariatric Surgery/adverse effects , Gastroesophageal Reflux/surgery , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Obesity/complications , Obesity/surgery , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Obesity, Morbid/surgery
10.
J Biomed Opt ; 29(4): 046001, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38585417

ABSTRACT

Significance: Endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer (EC) may enable early cancer diagnosis and treatment. While optical microendoscopic technology has shown promise in improving specificity, the limited field of view (<1 mm) significantly reduces the ability to survey large areas efficiently in EC screening. Aim: To improve the efficiency of endoscopic screening, we propose a novel concept of end-expandable endoscopic optical fiber probe for larger field of visualization and for the first time evaluate a deep-learning-based image super-resolution (DL-SR) method to overcome the issue of limited sampling capability. Approach: To demonstrate feasibility of the end-expandable optical fiber probe, DL-SR was applied on simulated low-resolution microendoscopic images to generate super-resolved (SR) ones. Varying the degradation model of image data acquisition, we identified the optimal parameters for optical fiber probe prototyping. The proposed screening method was validated with a human pathology reading study. Results: For various degradation parameters considered, the DL-SR method demonstrated different levels of improvement of traditional measures of image quality. The endoscopists' interpretations of the SR images were comparable to those performed on the high-resolution ones. Conclusions: This work suggests avenues for development of DL-SR-enabled sparse image reconstruction to improve high-yield EC screening and similar clinical applications.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Deep Learning , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Optical Fibers , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
11.
Hum Genomics ; 18(1): 37, 2024 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627859

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The causal associations of circulating lipids with Barrett's Esophagus (BE) and Esophageal Cancer (EC) has been a topic of debate. This study sought to elucidate the causality between circulating lipids and the risk of BE and EC. METHODS: We conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of circulating lipids (n = 94,595 - 431,167 individuals), BE (218,792 individuals), and EC (190,190 individuals) obtained from the publicly available IEU OpenGWAS database. The robustness and reliability of the results were ensured by employing inverse-variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO methods. The presence of horizontal pleiotropy, heterogeneities, and stability of instrumental variables were assessed through MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran's Q test, and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. Additionally, bidirectional MR and multivariable MR (MVMR) were performed to explore reverse causality and adjust for known confounders, respectively. RESULTS: None of the testing methods revealed statistically significant horizontal pleiotropy, directional pleiotropy, or heterogeneity. Univariate MR analyses using IVW indicated a robust causal relationship between increased triglycerides and BE (odds ratio [OR] = 1.79, p-value = 0.009), while no significant association with EC was observed. Inverse MR analysis indicated no evidence of reverse causality in the aforementioned outcomes. In MVMR analyses, elevated triglycerides (TRG) were significantly and positively associated with BE risk (OR = 1.79, p-value = 0.041). CONCLUSION: This MR study suggested that genetically increased triglycerides were closely related to an elevated risk of BE, potentially serving as a biomarker for the diagnosis of BE in the future.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/genetics , Mendelian Randomization Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Triglycerides , Lipids , Genome-Wide Association Study
12.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech ; 34(3): 268-274, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38563118

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the esophageal motility characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and their relationship with symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined 101 patients diagnosed with GERD by endoscopy and divided them into 3 groups as follows: nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), reflux esophagitis, and Barrett esophagus. Esophageal high-resolution manometry and the GERD Questionnaire were used to investigate the characteristics of esophageal dynamics and symptoms. In addition, the reflux symptom index was completed and the patients were divided into 7 groups according to symptoms. We then determined the correlation between dynamic esophageal characteristics and clinical symptoms. RESULTS: Upper (UES) and lower (LES) esophageal sphincter pressures and the 4-second integrated relaxation pressure in the RE group were lower than those in the NERD group. The 4-second integrated relaxation pressure in the Barrett esophagus group was also lower than that in the NERD group. In the analysis of extraesophageal symptoms, high-resolution manometry showed significant differences in UES pressures among all groups. Further subgroup analysis showed that compared with the group without extraesophageal symptoms, the UES pressure of the groups with pharyngeal foreign body sensation, throat clearing, and multiple extraesophageal symptoms was lower. CONCLUSIONS: As GERD severity increases, motor dysfunction of the LES and esophageal body gradually worsens, and the LES plays an important role in GERD development. Decreased UES pressure plays an important role in the occurrence of extraesophageal symptoms, which is more noticeable in patients with pharyngeal foreign body sensation and throat clearing.


Subject(s)
Gastroesophageal Reflux , Manometry , Humans , Gastroesophageal Reflux/physiopathology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Barrett Esophagus/physiopathology , Esophagitis, Peptic/physiopathology , Esophagitis, Peptic/diagnosis , Esophageal Sphincter, Lower/physiopathology , Pressure , Severity of Illness Index
14.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol ; 40(4): 319-327, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626060

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the number one risk factor for developing esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), a deadly cancer with limited treatment options that has been increasing in incidence in the US. In this report, we discuss current studies on the role of mesenchyme and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in BE and EAC, and we highlight translational prospects of targeting these cells. RECENT FINDINGS: New insights through studies using single-cell RNA sequencing (sc-RNA seq) have revealed an important emerging role of the mesenchyme in developmental signaling and cancer initiation. BE and EAC share similar stromal gene expression, as functional classifications of nonepithelial cells in BE show a remarkable similarity to EAC CAFs. Several recent sc-RNA seq studies and novel organoid fibroblast co-culture systems have characterized the subgroups of fibroblasts in BE and EAC, and have shown that these cells can directly influence the epithelium to induce BE development and cancer progression. Targeting the CAFs in EAC with may be a promising novel therapeutic strategy. SUMMARY: The fibroblasts in the surrounding mesenchyme may have a direct role in influencing altered epithelial plasticity during BE development and progression to EAC.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts , Esophageal Neoplasms , Fibroblasts , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts/pathology , Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts/metabolism , Fibroblasts/metabolism , Fibroblasts/pathology , Disease Progression
15.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(11): 1494-1496, 2024 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38617459

ABSTRACT

Artificial intelligence (AI) is making significant strides in revolutionizing the detection of Barrett's esophagus (BE), a precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma. In the research article by Tsai et al, researchers utilized endoscopic images to train an AI model, challenging the traditional distinction between endoscopic and histological BE. This approach yielded remarkable results, with the AI system achieving an accuracy of 94.37%, sensitivity of 94.29%, and specificity of 94.44%. The study's extensive dataset enhances the AI model's practicality, offering valuable support to endoscopists by minimizing unnecessary biopsies. However, questions about the applicability to different endoscopic systems remain. The study underscores the potential of AI in BE detection while highlighting the need for further research to assess its adaptability to diverse clinical settings.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Artificial Intelligence , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Biopsy
16.
Korean J Gastroenterol ; 83(3): 81-86, 2024 Mar 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522850

ABSTRACT

Obesity increases gastroesophageal reflux disease through several factors. As a result, Barrett's esophagus, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and gastroesophageal junctional gastric cancer are increasing. Existing studies usually defined obesity by body mass index and analyzed the correlation. Recently, more studies have shown that central obesity is a more important variable in upper gastrointestinal diseases related to gastroesophageal reflux. Studies have reported that weight loss is effective in reducing gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Obesity also affects functional gastrointestinal diseases. A significant correlation was shown in upper abdominal pain, reflux, vomiting, and diarrhea rather than lower abdominal diseases.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagitis, Peptic , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Obesity/complications
17.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol ; 68: 101882, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522880

ABSTRACT

High-risk T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma (HR-T1 EAC) is defined as T1 cancer, with one or more of the following histological criteria: submucosal invasion, poorly or undifferentiated cancer, and/or presence of lympho-vascular invasion. Esophagectomy has long been the only available treatment for these HR-T1 EACs and was considered necessary because of a presumed high risk of lymph node metastases up to 46%. However, endoscopic submucosal disscection have made it possible to radically remove HR-T1 EAC, irrespective of size, while leaving the esophageal anatomy intact. Parallel to this development, new publications demonstrated that the risk of lymph node metastases for HR-T1 EAC may be even <24%. Therefore, indications for endoscopic treatment of HR-T1 EAC are being reconsidered and current research aims at finding the optimal management strategy for this indication, where watchful waiting may proof to be an acceptable strategy in selected patients. In this review, we will discuss the latest developments in this field.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Esophagoscopy , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Barrett Esophagus/pathology
18.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol ; 68: 101886, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522884

ABSTRACT

The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma has been increasing rapidly in the Western world. A well-known risk factor for developing this type of tumour is reflux disease, which can cause metaplasia from the squamous cell mucosa to columnar epithelium (Barrett's Oesophagus) which can progress to dysplasia and eventually adenocarcinoma. With the rise of the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma, research on the best way to manage this disease is of great importance and has changed treatment modalities over the last decades. The gold standard for superficial adenocarcinoma has shifted from surgical to endoscopic management when certain criteria are met. This review will discuss the different curative criteria for endoscopic treatment of oesophageal adenocarcinoma.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Esophagoscopy
19.
Ann Diagn Pathol ; 70: 152285, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38518703

ABSTRACT

Recent genomic studies suggest that esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is not homogeneous and can be divided into true (tEAC) and probable (pEAC) groups. We compared clinicopathologic and prognostic features between the two groups of EAC. Based on endoscopic, radiologic, surgical, and pathologic reports, tumors with epicenters beyond 2 cm of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) were assigned to the tEAC group (N = 63), while epicenters within 2 cm of, but not crossing the GEJ, were allocated to the pEAC group (N = 83). All 146 consecutive patients were male (age: median 70 years, range: 51-88) and White-predominant (98.6 %). There was no significant difference in gastroesophageal reflux disease, obesity, comorbidity, and the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus, and cases diagnosed during endoscopic surveillance. However, compared to the pEAC group, the tEAC group had significantly more cases with hiatal hernia (P = 0.003); their tumors were significantly smaller in size (P = 0.007), more frequently with tubular/papillary adenocarcinoma (P = 0.001), had fewer cases with poorly cohesive carcinoma (P = 0.018), and demonstrated better prognosis in stage I disease (P = 0.012); 5-year overall survival (34.9 months) was significantly longer (versus 16.8 months in pEACs) (P = 0.043). Compared to the patients without resection, the patients treated with endoscopic or surgical resection showed significantly better outcomes, irrespective of stages. We concluded that EACs were heterogeneous with two distinct tEAC and pEAC groups in clinicopathology and prognosis; resection remained the better option for improved outcomes. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: Esophageal adenocarcinoma can be divided into true or probable groups with distinct clinicopathology and better prognosis in the former than in the latter. we showed that resection remained the better option for improved outcomes.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Aged , Prognosis , Aged, 80 and over , Longitudinal Studies , Female , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/pathology
20.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis ; 33(1): 19-24, 2024 Mar 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38554413

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Previous studies have reported gender differences in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). These studies have also reported differences based on gender in the rates of complications. In this study, we aim to identify gender disparities in the rates of GERD complications in the United States. METHODS: We queried the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample database to identify patients with GERD. Patients with eosinophilic esophagitis or missing demographics were excluded. We compared patient demographics, comorbidities and complications based on gender. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the impact of gender on complications of GERD. RESULTS: 27.2 million patients were included in the analysis. Out of them, 58.4% of the hospitalized patients with GERD were female. Majority of the women were White (75%), aged>65 years (57.5%) and were in the Medicare group (64%). After adjusting for confounders, females were noted to have lower odds of esophagitis (aOR=0.85, 95%CI: 0.84-0.86, p<0.001), esophageal stricture (aOR=0.95, 95%CI: 0.93-0.97, p<0.001), Barrett's esophagus (aOR=0.58, 95%CI: 0.57-0.59, p<0.001) and esophageal cancer (aOR=0.22, 95%CI: 0.21-0.23, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the findings of previous literature that females, despite comprising the majority of the study population, had a lower incidence of GERD related complications. Further studies identifying the underlying reason for these differences are required.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagitis , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Humans , Female , Aged , United States/epidemiology , Male , Medicare , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Gastroesophageal Reflux/epidemiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/epidemiology , Esophageal Neoplasms/complications , Hospitalization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...