Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.381
Filter
1.
BMJ ; 385: e074962, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830686

ABSTRACT

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy worldwide, with over 470 000 new cases diagnosed each year. Two distinct histological subtypes predominate, and should be considered biologically separate disease entities.1 These subtypes are esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Outcomes remain poor regardless of subtype, with most patients presenting with late stage disease.2 Novel strategies to improve early detection of the respective precursor lesions, squamous dysplasia, and Barrett's esophagus offer the potential to improve outcomes. The introduction of a limited number of biologic agents, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors, is resulting in improvements in the systemic treatment of locally advanced and metastatic esophageal cancer. These developments, coupled with improvements in minimally invasive surgical and endoscopic treatment approaches, as well as adaptive and precision radiotherapy technologies, offer the potential to improve outcomes still further. This review summarizes the latest advances in the diagnosis and management of esophageal cancer, and the developments in understanding of the biology of this disease.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/therapy , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/diagnosis , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Esophagoscopy/methods , Barrett Esophagus/therapy , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/pathology
2.
Methods Cell Biol ; 186: 25-49, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38705603

ABSTRACT

One of the earliest applications of flow cytometry was the measurement of DNA content in cells. This method is based on the ability to stain DNA in a stoichiometric manner (i.e., the amount of stain is directly proportional to the amount of DNA within the cell). For more than 40years, a number of studies have consistently demonstrated the utility of DNA flow cytometry as a potential diagnostic and/or prognostic tool in patients with most epithelial tumors, including pre-invasive lesions (such as dysplasia) in the gastrointestinal tract. However, its availability as a clinical test has been limited to few medical centers due to the requirement for fresh tissue in earlier studies and perceived technical demands. However, more recent studies have successfully utilized formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue to generate high-quality DNA content histograms, demonstrating the feasibility of this methodology. This review summarizes step-by-step methods on how to perform DNA flow cytometry using FFPE tissue and analyze DNA content histograms based on the published consensus guidelines in order to assist in the diagnosis and/or risk stratification of many different epithelial tumors, with particular emphasis on dysplasia associated with Barrett's esophagus and inflammatory bowel disease.


Subject(s)
Flow Cytometry , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , Genomic Instability , Humans , Flow Cytometry/methods , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/genetics , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Genomic Instability/genetics , Precancerous Conditions/genetics , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Tissue Fixation/methods , Paraffin Embedding/methods , DNA/genetics , DNA/analysis , Gastrointestinal Tract/pathology , Gastrointestinal Tract/metabolism , Barrett Esophagus/genetics , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis
3.
Br J Surg ; 111(5)2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736137

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Barrett's oesophagus surveillance places significant burden on endoscopy services yet is vital to detect early cancerous change. Oesophageal cell collection device (OCCD) testing was introduced across Scotland for Barrett's surveillance in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This national pragmatic retrospective study presents the CytoSCOT programme results and evaluates whether OCCD testing is successfully identifying high-risk Barrett's patients requiring urgent endoscopy. METHODS: All patients undergoing OCCD testing for Barrett's surveillance across 11 Scottish health boards over a 32-month period were identified. Patients who underwent endoscopy within 12 months of OCCD test were included. Individual patient records were interrogated to record clinical information and OCCD test result to categorize patients into risk groups. Endoscopic histopathology results were analysed according to risk group and segment length. Patients were deemed high risk if the OCCD test demonstrated atypia and/or p53 positivity. RESULTS: 4204 OCCD tests were performed in 3745 patients: 608 patients underwent endoscopy within 12 months and were included in this analysis. Patients with longer Barrett's segments were significantly more likely to have an abnormal OCCD test. 50/608 patients (8.2%) had high-grade dysplasia or cancer on endoscopic biopsies: this equates to 1.3% of the total group (50/3745). 46/50 patients (92.0%) were deemed high risk, triggering urgent endoscopy: this rose to 100% with insufficient tests removed. There were no cancers diagnosed within 12 months post-OCCD in the low-risk group. CONCLUSION: OCCD testing is an effective triage tool to identify high-risk patients with Barrett's oesophagus requiring further investigation with endoscopy within the real-world setting.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagoscopy , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Esophagoscopy/methods , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , COVID-19/diagnosis , Scotland/epidemiology , Biomarkers/metabolism , Risk Assessment , Esophagus/pathology , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Adult
4.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302204, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709808

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a precancerous condition that has the potential to develop into esophageal cancer (EC). Currently, there is a wide range of management options available for individuals at different pathological stages in Barrett's esophagus (BE). However, there is currently a lack of knowledge regarding their comparative efficacy. To address this gap, we conducted a network meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials to examine the comparative effectiveness of all regimens. METHODS: Data extracted from eligible randomized controlled trials were utilized in a Bayesian network meta-analysis to examine the relative effectiveness of BE's treatment regimens and determine their ranking in terms of efficacy. The ranking probability for each regimen was assessed using the surfaces under cumulative ranking values. The outcomes under investigation were complete ablation of BE, neoplastic progression of BE, and complete eradication of dysplasia. RESULTS: We identified twenty-three RCT studies with a total of 1675 participants, and ten different interventions. Regarding complete ablation of non-dysplastic BE, the comparative effectiveness ranking indicated that argon plasma coagulation (APC) was the most effective regimen, with the highest SUCRA value, while surveillance and PPI/H2RA were found to be the least efficacious regimens. For complete ablation of BE with low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, or esophageal cancer, photodynamic therapy (PDT) had the highest SUCRA value of 94.1%, indicating it as the best regimen. Additionally, for complete eradication of dysplasia, SUCRA plots showed a trend in ranking PDT as the highest with a SUCRA value of 91.2%. Finally, for neoplastic progression, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgery were found to perform significantly better than surveillance. The risk of bias assessment revealed that 6 studies had an overall high risk of bias. However, meta-regression with risk of bias as a covariate did not indicate any influence on the model. In terms of the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis evaluation, a high level of confidence was found for all treatment comparisons. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic surveillance alone or PPI/H2RA alone may not be sufficient for managing BE, even in cases of non-dysplastic BE. However, APC has shown excellent efficacy in treating non-dysplastic BE. For cases of BE with low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, or esophageal cancer, PDT may be the optimal intervention as it can induce regression of BE metaplasia and prevent future progression of BE to dysplasia and EC.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Network Meta-Analysis , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/therapy , Barrett Esophagus/surgery , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Bayes Theorem , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Precancerous Conditions/surgery , Precancerous Conditions/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Argon Plasma Coagulation , Disease Progression
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821668

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we studied the potential genotoxic effects of human plasma from healthy volunteers, as well as patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's oesophagus (BO) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) using the oesophageal adenocarcinoma cell line (OE33) and the lymphoblastoid cell line (TK6). Both TK6 and OE33 cells were treated with plasma (10 % volume, replacing foetal bovine serum (FBS) or horse serum (HS)) at different time points of 4 h (for the micronucleus (Mn) assay and the invasion assay) and 24 h (for the cell cycle studies). Plasma-induced effects on DNA damage levels, cell viability and the cell cycle were studied by the micronucleus assay, cytokinesis block proliferation index (CBPI) and flow cytometry respectively. The expression of IL-8 in supernatants of TK6 cells and IFN-ß in OE33 cells was also analysed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Finally, we carried out an assessment of cellular invasion of OE33 cells following plasma treatment. The results of the micronucleus assay confirmed the genotoxicity of direct plasma treatment from some participants through the increase in DNA damage in TK6 cells. Conversely, some individual patient plasma samples reduced background levels of TK6 cell Mn frequency, in an anti-genotoxic fashion. In TK6 cells, (on average) plasma samples from patients with Barrett's oesophagus induced higher micronucleus levels than healthy volunteers (p= 0.0019). There was little difference in Mn induction when using plasma versus serum to treat the cells in vitro. Cell cycle results showed that direct plasma treatment had a marked impact on OE33 cells at 24 h (p=0.0182 for BO and p=0.0320 for OAC) by decreasing the proportion of cells in the S phase, while plasma exposure was less impactful on the cell cycle of TK6 cells. Invasion of OE33 cells was also seen to be non-significantly affected by plasma treatment of OE33 cells. The addition of N-acetyl cysteine NAC in a dose-dependent matter did not alter the formation of Mn in TK6 cells, suggesting that reactive oxygen species (ROS) are not the root cause of plasma's genotoxicity. The concentration of IL-8 in TK6 cells and IFN-ß in OE33 cells was significantly higher in cells treated with OAC-derived plasma than in the untreated negative control. Collectively, our results demonstrate that plasma-specific effects are detectable which helps us better understand some important aspects of the biology of blood-based biomarkers under development.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , DNA Damage , Esophageal Neoplasms , Micronucleus Tests , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Plasma/metabolism , Interleukin-8/metabolism , Interleukin-8/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Cycle/drug effects , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Cell Survival/drug effects , Female , Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective , Interferon-beta , Aged
6.
Gastroenterology ; 166(6): 1020-1055, 2024 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38763697

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) can be effective in eradicating BE and related neoplasia and has greater risk of harms and resource use than surveillance endoscopy. This clinical practice guideline aims to inform clinicians and patients by providing evidence-based practice recommendations for the use of EET in BE and related neoplasia. METHODS: The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework was used to assess evidence and make recommendations. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients, conducted an evidence review, and used the Evidence-to-Decision Framework to develop recommendations regarding the use of EET in patients with BE under the following scenarios: presence of (1) high-grade dysplasia, (2) low-grade dysplasia, (3) no dysplasia, and (4) choice of stepwise endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or focal EMR plus ablation, and (5) endoscopic submucosal dissection vs EMR. Clinical recommendations were based on the balance between desirable and undesirable effects, patient values, costs, and health equity considerations. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 5 recommendations for the use of EET in BE and related neoplasia. Based on the available evidence, the panel made a strong recommendation in favor of EET in patients with BE high-grade dysplasia and conditional recommendation against EET in BE without dysplasia. The panel made a conditional recommendation in favor of EET in BE low-grade dysplasia; patients with BE low-grade dysplasia who place a higher value on the potential harms and lower value on the benefits (which are uncertain) regarding reduction of esophageal cancer mortality could reasonably select surveillance endoscopy. In patients with visible lesions, a conditional recommendation was made in favor of focal EMR plus ablation over stepwise EMR. In patients with visible neoplastic lesions undergoing resection, the use of either endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection was suggested based on lesion characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: This document provides a comprehensive outline of the indications for EET in the management of BE and related neoplasia. Guidance is also provided regarding the considerations surrounding implementation of EET. Providers should engage in shared decision making based on patient preferences. Limitations and gaps in the evidence are highlighted to guide future research opportunities.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagoscopy , Barrett Esophagus/surgery , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects , Esophagoscopy/standards , Esophagoscopy/adverse effects , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Gastroenterology/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Treatment Outcome , Clinical Decision-Making , Ablation Techniques/adverse effects , Ablation Techniques/standards
7.
J Biomed Opt ; 29(4): 046001, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38585417

ABSTRACT

Significance: Endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer (EC) may enable early cancer diagnosis and treatment. While optical microendoscopic technology has shown promise in improving specificity, the limited field of view (<1 mm) significantly reduces the ability to survey large areas efficiently in EC screening. Aim: To improve the efficiency of endoscopic screening, we propose a novel concept of end-expandable endoscopic optical fiber probe for larger field of visualization and for the first time evaluate a deep-learning-based image super-resolution (DL-SR) method to overcome the issue of limited sampling capability. Approach: To demonstrate feasibility of the end-expandable optical fiber probe, DL-SR was applied on simulated low-resolution microendoscopic images to generate super-resolved (SR) ones. Varying the degradation model of image data acquisition, we identified the optimal parameters for optical fiber probe prototyping. The proposed screening method was validated with a human pathology reading study. Results: For various degradation parameters considered, the DL-SR method demonstrated different levels of improvement of traditional measures of image quality. The endoscopists' interpretations of the SR images were comparable to those performed on the high-resolution ones. Conclusions: This work suggests avenues for development of DL-SR-enabled sparse image reconstruction to improve high-yield EC screening and similar clinical applications.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Deep Learning , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Optical Fibers , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
8.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol ; 40(4): 319-327, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626060

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the number one risk factor for developing esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), a deadly cancer with limited treatment options that has been increasing in incidence in the US. In this report, we discuss current studies on the role of mesenchyme and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in BE and EAC, and we highlight translational prospects of targeting these cells. RECENT FINDINGS: New insights through studies using single-cell RNA sequencing (sc-RNA seq) have revealed an important emerging role of the mesenchyme in developmental signaling and cancer initiation. BE and EAC share similar stromal gene expression, as functional classifications of nonepithelial cells in BE show a remarkable similarity to EAC CAFs. Several recent sc-RNA seq studies and novel organoid fibroblast co-culture systems have characterized the subgroups of fibroblasts in BE and EAC, and have shown that these cells can directly influence the epithelium to induce BE development and cancer progression. Targeting the CAFs in EAC with may be a promising novel therapeutic strategy. SUMMARY: The fibroblasts in the surrounding mesenchyme may have a direct role in influencing altered epithelial plasticity during BE development and progression to EAC.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts , Esophageal Neoplasms , Fibroblasts , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts/pathology , Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts/metabolism , Fibroblasts/metabolism , Fibroblasts/pathology , Disease Progression
9.
Korean J Gastroenterol ; 83(3): 81-86, 2024 Mar 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522850

ABSTRACT

Obesity increases gastroesophageal reflux disease through several factors. As a result, Barrett's esophagus, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and gastroesophageal junctional gastric cancer are increasing. Existing studies usually defined obesity by body mass index and analyzed the correlation. Recently, more studies have shown that central obesity is a more important variable in upper gastrointestinal diseases related to gastroesophageal reflux. Studies have reported that weight loss is effective in reducing gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Obesity also affects functional gastrointestinal diseases. A significant correlation was shown in upper abdominal pain, reflux, vomiting, and diarrhea rather than lower abdominal diseases.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagitis, Peptic , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Gastroesophageal Reflux/diagnosis , Obesity/complications
10.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol ; 68: 101882, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522880

ABSTRACT

High-risk T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma (HR-T1 EAC) is defined as T1 cancer, with one or more of the following histological criteria: submucosal invasion, poorly or undifferentiated cancer, and/or presence of lympho-vascular invasion. Esophagectomy has long been the only available treatment for these HR-T1 EACs and was considered necessary because of a presumed high risk of lymph node metastases up to 46%. However, endoscopic submucosal disscection have made it possible to radically remove HR-T1 EAC, irrespective of size, while leaving the esophageal anatomy intact. Parallel to this development, new publications demonstrated that the risk of lymph node metastases for HR-T1 EAC may be even <24%. Therefore, indications for endoscopic treatment of HR-T1 EAC are being reconsidered and current research aims at finding the optimal management strategy for this indication, where watchful waiting may proof to be an acceptable strategy in selected patients. In this review, we will discuss the latest developments in this field.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Esophagoscopy , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Barrett Esophagus/pathology
11.
Ann Diagn Pathol ; 70: 152285, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38518703

ABSTRACT

Recent genomic studies suggest that esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is not homogeneous and can be divided into true (tEAC) and probable (pEAC) groups. We compared clinicopathologic and prognostic features between the two groups of EAC. Based on endoscopic, radiologic, surgical, and pathologic reports, tumors with epicenters beyond 2 cm of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) were assigned to the tEAC group (N = 63), while epicenters within 2 cm of, but not crossing the GEJ, were allocated to the pEAC group (N = 83). All 146 consecutive patients were male (age: median 70 years, range: 51-88) and White-predominant (98.6 %). There was no significant difference in gastroesophageal reflux disease, obesity, comorbidity, and the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus, and cases diagnosed during endoscopic surveillance. However, compared to the pEAC group, the tEAC group had significantly more cases with hiatal hernia (P = 0.003); their tumors were significantly smaller in size (P = 0.007), more frequently with tubular/papillary adenocarcinoma (P = 0.001), had fewer cases with poorly cohesive carcinoma (P = 0.018), and demonstrated better prognosis in stage I disease (P = 0.012); 5-year overall survival (34.9 months) was significantly longer (versus 16.8 months in pEACs) (P = 0.043). Compared to the patients without resection, the patients treated with endoscopic or surgical resection showed significantly better outcomes, irrespective of stages. We concluded that EACs were heterogeneous with two distinct tEAC and pEAC groups in clinicopathology and prognosis; resection remained the better option for improved outcomes. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: Esophageal adenocarcinoma can be divided into true or probable groups with distinct clinicopathology and better prognosis in the former than in the latter. we showed that resection remained the better option for improved outcomes.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Aged , Prognosis , Aged, 80 and over , Longitudinal Studies , Female , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/pathology
12.
J Hum Genet ; 69(6): 245-253, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429412

ABSTRACT

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent chronic ailment, and present therapeutic approaches are not always effective. This study aimed to find new drug targets for GERD and Barrett's esophagus (BE). We obtained genetic instruments for GERD, BE, and 2004 plasma proteins from recently published genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and Mendelian randomization (MR) was employed to explore potential drug targets. We further winnowed down MR-prioritized proteins through replication, reverse causality testing, colocalization analysis, phenotype scanning, and Phenome-wide MR. Furthermore, we constructed a protein-protein interaction network, unveiling potential associations among candidate proteins. Simultaneously, we acquired mRNA expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data from another GWAS encompassing four different tissues to identify additional drug targets. Meanwhile, we searched drug databases to evaluate these targets. Under Bonferroni correction (P < 4.8 × 10-5), we identified 11 plasma proteins significantly associated with GERD. Among these, 7 are protective proteins (MSP, GPX1, ERBB3, BT3A3, ANTR2, CCM2, and DECR2), while 4 are detrimental proteins (TMEM106B, DUSP13, C1-INH, and LINGO1). Ultimately, C1-INH and DECR2 successfully passed the screening process and exhibited similar directional causal effects on BE. Further analysis of eQTLs highlighted 4 potential drug targets, including EDEM3, PBX3, MEIS1-AS3, and NME7. The search of drug databases further supported our conclusions. Our study indicated that the plasma proteins C1-INH and DECR2, along with 4 genes (EDEM3, PBX3, MEIS1-AS3, and NME7), may represent potential drug targets for GERD and BE, warranting further investigation.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Genome-Wide Association Study , Mendelian Randomization Analysis , Quantitative Trait Loci , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/genetics , Barrett Esophagus/drug therapy , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/genetics , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Protein Interaction Maps/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
13.
Gut ; 73(6): 897-909, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553042

ABSTRACT

Barrett's oesophagus is the only known precursor to oesophageal adenocarcinoma, a cancer with very poor prognosis. The main risk factors for Barrett's oesophagus are a history of gastro-oesophageal acid reflux symptoms and obesity. Men, smokers and those with a family history are also at increased risk. Progression from Barrett's oesophagus to cancer occurs via an intermediate stage, known as dysplasia. However, dysplasia and early cancer usually develop without any clinical signs, often in individuals whose symptoms are well controlled by acid suppressant medications; therefore, endoscopic surveillance is recommended to allow for early diagnosis and timely clinical intervention. Individuals with Barrett's oesophagus need to be fully informed about the implications of this diagnosis and the benefits and risks of monitoring strategies. Pharmacological treatments are recommended for control of symptoms, but not for chemoprevention. Dysplasia and stage 1 oesophageal adenocarcinoma have excellent prognoses, since they can be cured with endoscopic or surgical therapies. Endoscopic resection is the most accurate staging technique for early Barrett's-related oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Endoscopic ablation is effective and indicated to eradicate Barrett's oesophagus in patients with dysplasia. Future research should focus on improved accuracy for dysplasia detection via new technologies and providing more robust evidence to support pathways for follow-up and treatment.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Barrett Esophagus/therapy , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/etiology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Esophagoscopy/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Disease Progression , Risk Factors , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Precancerous Conditions/therapy , Precancerous Conditions/diagnosis
14.
Gastroenterology ; 166(6): 1058-1068, 2024 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447738

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Follow-up (FU) strategies after endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) for Barrett's neoplasia do not consider the risk of mortality from causes other than esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). We aimed to evaluate this risk during long-term FU, and to assess whether the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) can predict mortality. METHODS: We included all patients with successful EET from the nationwide Barrett registry in the Netherlands. Data were merged with National Statistics for accurate mortality data. We evaluated annual mortality rates (AMRs, per 1000 person-years) and standardized mortality ratio for other-cause mortality. Performance of the CCI was evaluated by discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: We included 1154 patients with a mean age of 64 years (±9). During median 59 months (p25-p75 37-91; total 6375 person-years), 154 patients (13%) died from other causes than EAC (AMR, 24.1; 95% CI, 20.5-28.2), most commonly non-EAC cancers (n = 58), cardiovascular (n = 31), or pulmonary diseases (n = 26). Four patients died from recurrent EAC (AMR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.1-1.4). Compared with the general Dutch population, mortality was significantly increased for patients in the lowest 3 age quartiles (ie, age <71 years). Validation of CCI in our population showed good discrimination (Concordance statistic, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.84) and fair calibration. CONCLUSION: The other-cause mortality risk after successful EET was more than 40 times higher (48; 95% CI, 15-99) than the risk of EAC-related mortality. Our findings reveal that younger post-EET patients exhibit a significantly reduced life expectancy when compared with the general population. Furthermore, they emphasize the strong predictive ability of CCI for long-term mortality after EET. This straightforward scoring system can inform decisions regarding personalized FU, including appropriate cessation timing. (NL7039).


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Registries , Humans , Middle Aged , Male , Barrett Esophagus/surgery , Barrett Esophagus/mortality , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Female , Netherlands/epidemiology , Aged , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Incidence , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Esophagoscopy/adverse effects , Cause of Death , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Comorbidity
15.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 2026, 2024 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38467600

ABSTRACT

Timely detection of Barrett's esophagus, the pre-malignant condition of esophageal adenocarcinoma, can improve patient survival rates. The Cytosponge-TFF3 test, a non-endoscopic minimally invasive procedure, has been used for diagnosing intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's. However, it depends on pathologist's assessment of two slides stained with H&E and the immunohistochemical biomarker TFF3. This resource-intensive clinical workflow limits large-scale screening in the at-risk population. To improve screening capacity, we propose a deep learning approach for detecting Barrett's from routinely stained H&E slides. The approach solely relies on diagnostic labels, eliminating the need for expensive localized expert annotations. We train and independently validate our approach on two clinical trial datasets, totaling 1866 patients. We achieve 91.4% and 87.3% AUROCs on discovery and external test datasets for the H&E model, comparable to the TFF3 model. Our proposed semi-automated clinical workflow can reduce pathologists' workload to 48% without sacrificing diagnostic performance, enabling pathologists to prioritize high risk cases.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Deep Learning , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Metaplasia
16.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 36(4): e14750, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38297487

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have demonstrated that obesity may be associated with the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and GERD-related complications. However, such association has never been assessed in a global-wide real-world patient population. METHODS: The TriNetX electronic health records network, which involves 92 healthcare organizations in 12 countries, was utilized for this multicenter global health research network study. The cohort with obesity comprised adult patients with body mass index (BMI) of more than 30 kg/m2. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching to decrease confounders effects. The prevalence of GERD and GERD-related complications including erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus (BE), BE with dysplasia, and esophageal adenocarcinoma were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 2,356,548 patients were included in the obesity and non-obesity groups after propensity score matching. In the group with obesity, patients had a significantly higher prevalence of GERD (30% vs. 24%, OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.34-1.36) compared to the group without obesity. Further analysis showed a higher prevalence of GERD-related complications in the group with obesity with statistical significance: Erosive esophagitis (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.08), Barrett's esophagus (1.08, 1.05-1.10), BE with dysplasia (1.11, 1.04-1.18), esophageal cancer (1.32, 1.15-1.51). CONCLUSION: Globally, obesity was associated with a higher prevalence of GERD and GERD-related complications.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus , Esophagitis , Gastroesophageal Reflux , Adult , Humans , Barrett Esophagus/epidemiology , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Prevalence , Gastroesophageal Reflux/complications , Gastroesophageal Reflux/epidemiology , Gastroesophageal Reflux/pathology , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Esophagitis/epidemiology
17.
J Exp Clin Cancer Res ; 43(1): 53, 2024 Feb 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38383387

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer is one of the 10 most common cancers worldwide and its incidence is dramatically increasing. Despite some improvements, the current surveillance protocol with white light endoscopy and random untargeted biopsies collection (Seattle protocol) fails to diagnose dysplastic and cancerous lesions in up to 50% of patients. Therefore, new endoscopic imaging technologies in combination with tumor-specific molecular probes are needed to improve early detection. Herein, we investigated the use of the fluorescent Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase 1 (PARP1)-inhibitor PARPi-FL for early detection of dysplastic lesions in patient-derived organoids and transgenic mouse models, which closely mimic the transformation from non-malignant Barrett's Esophagus (BE) to invasive esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). METHODS: We determined PARP1 expression via immunohistochemistry (IHC) in human biospecimens and mouse tissues. We also assessed PARPi-FL uptake in patient- and mouse-derived organoids. Following intravenous injection of 75 nmol PARPi-FL/mouse in L2-IL1B (n = 4) and L2-IL1B/IL8Tg mice (n = 12), we conducted fluorescence molecular endoscopy (FME) and/or imaged whole excised stomachs to assess PARPi-FL accumulation in dysplastic lesions. L2-IL1B/IL8Tg mice (n = 3) and wild-type (WT) mice (n = 2) without PARPi-FL injection served as controls. The imaging results were validated by confocal microscopy and IHC of excised tissues. RESULTS: IHC on patient and murine tissue revealed similar patterns of increasing PARP1 expression in presence of dysplasia and cancer. In human and murine organoids, PARPi-FL localized to PARP1-expressing epithelial cell nuclei after 10 min of incubation. Injection of PARPi-FL in transgenic mouse models of BE resulted in the successful detection of lesions via FME, with a mean target-to-background ratio > 2 independently from the disease stage. The localization of PARPi-FL in the lesions was confirmed by imaging of the excised stomachs and confocal microscopy. Without PARPi-FL injection, identification of lesions via FME in transgenic mice was not possible. CONCLUSION: PARPi-FL imaging is a promising approach for clinically needed improved detection of dysplastic and malignant EAC lesions in patients with BE. Since PARPi-FL is currently evaluated in a phase 2 clinical trial for oral cancer detection after topical application, clinical translation for early detection of dysplasia and EAC in BE patients via FME screening appears feasible.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Mice , Animals , Early Detection of Cancer , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/genetics , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Mice, Transgenic , Endoscopy , Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1/genetics
18.
Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 17(6): 1025-1038, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38325549

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This review was developed to provide a thorough and effective update on models relevant to esophageal metaplasia, dysplasia, and carcinogenesis, focusing on the advantages and limitations of different models of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). METHODS: This expert review was written on the basis of a thorough review of the literature combined with expert interpretation of the state of the field. We emphasized advances over the years 2012-2023 and provided detailed information related to the characterization of established human esophageal cell lines. RESULTS: New insights have been gained into the pathogenesis of BE and EAC using patient-derived samples and single-cell approaches. Relevant animal models include genetic as well as surgical mouse models and emphasize the development of lesions at the squamocolumnar junction in the mouse stomach. Rat models are generated using surgical approaches that directly connect the small intestine and esophagus. Large animal models have the advantage of including features in human esophagus such as esophageal submucosal glands. Alternatively, cell culture approaches remain important in the field and allow for personalized approaches, and scientific rigor can be ensured by authentication of cell lines. CONCLUSIONS: Research in BE and EAC remains highly relevant given the morbidity and mortality associated with cancers of the tubular esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Careful selection of models and inclusion of human samples whenever possible will ensure relevance to human health and disease.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Disease Models, Animal , Esophageal Neoplasms , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Animals , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Mice , Rats
19.
Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 17(5): 769-784, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38296052

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Barrett's esophagus is the precursor of esophageal dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma. CDKN2A-p16 deletions were reported in 34%-74% of patients with Barrett's esophagus who progressed to dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma, suggesting that p16 loss may drive neoplastic progression. KRAS activation frequently occurs in esophageal adenocarcinoma and precancer lesions. LGR5+ stem cells in the squamocolumnar-junction (SCJ) of mouse stomach contribute as Barrett's esophagus progenitors. We aimed to determine the functional effects of p16 loss and KRAS activation in Barrett's-like metaplasia and dysplasia development. METHODS: We established mouse models with conditional knockout of CDKN2A-p16 (p16KO) and/or activated KRASG12D expression targeting SCJ LGR5+ cells in interleukin 1b transgenic mice and characterized histologic alterations (mucous-gland hyperplasia/metaplasia, inflammation, and dysplasia) in mouse SCJ. Gene expression was determined by microarray, RNA sequencing, and immunohistochemistry of SCJ tissues and cultured 3-dimensional organoids. RESULTS: p16KO mice exhibited increased mucous-gland hyperplasia/metaplasia versus control mice (P = .0051). Combined p16KO+KRASG12D resulted in more frequent dysplasia and higher dysplasia scores (P = .0036), with 82% of p16KO+KRASG12D mice developing high-grade dysplasia. SCJ transcriptome analysis showed several activated pathways in p16KO versus control mice (apoptosis, tumor necrosis factor-α/nuclear factor-kB, proteasome degradation, p53 signaling, MAPK, KRAS, and G1-to-S transition). CONCLUSIONS: p16 deletion in LGR5+ cell precursors triggers increased SCJ mucous-gland hyperplasia/metaplasia. KRASG12D synergizes with p16 deletion resulting in higher grades of SCJ glandular dysplasia, mimicking Barrett's high-grade dysplasia. These genetically modified mouse models establish a functional role of p16 and activated KRAS in the progression of Barrett's-like lesions to dysplasia in mice, representing an in vivo model of esophageal adenocarcinoma precancer. Derived 3-dimensional organoid models further provide in vitro modeling opportunities of esophageal precancer stages.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Barrett Esophagus , Esophageal Neoplasms , Precancerous Conditions , Humans , Mice , Animals , Barrett Esophagus/genetics , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/metabolism , Hyperplasia , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Metaplasia/genetics , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16/genetics , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...