Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 100(1): 567-570, 2015 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26323861

ABSTRACT

This paper reports the impact of oil spills and tar-ball pollution on the coastal ecosystem of Goa. The factors responsible for degrading the marine ecosystem of the Goan coastline are analyzed. Uncontrolled activities were found to degrade the marine and coastal biodiversity, in turn polluting all beaches. This had a direct impact on the Goan economy through a decline in tourism. The government must adopt the necessary control measures to restore Goan beaches and the surrounding coastal areas.


Subject(s)
Bathing Beaches , Ecosystem , Environment , Petroleum Pollution , Animals , Bathing Beaches/economics , Biodiversity , Copepoda , Environmental Pollution , Humans , India , Petroleum , Petroleum Pollution/adverse effects , Petroleum Pollution/analysis , Phytoplankton , Pseudomonas , Temperature , Travel/economics , Zooplankton
2.
J Environ Manage ; 161: 237-242, 2015 Sep 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26188988

ABSTRACT

Understanding and quantifying the trade-off between the requirement for clean safe bathing water and beaches and their wider ecosystem services is central to the aims of the European Union (EU) Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), and vital for the sustainability and economic viability of designated bathing waters. Uncertainty surrounding the impacts of ensuing bathing water policy transitions, e.g. the EU revised Bathing Waters Directive (rBWD), puts new urgency on our need to understand the importance of natural beach assets for human recreation, wildlife habitat and for protection from flooding and erosion. However, managing coastal zones solely in terms of public health could have potentially negative consequences on a range of other social and cultural ecosystem services, e.g. recreation. Improving our knowledge of how bathing waters, surrounding beach environments and local economies might respond to shifts in management decisions is critical in order to inform reliable decision-making, and to evaluate future implications for human health. In this paper we explore the conflicts and trade-offs that emerge at public beach environments, and propose the development of an evaluative framework of viable alternatives in environmental management whereby bathing waters are managed for their greatest utility, driven by identifying the optimal ecosystem service provision at any particular site.


Subject(s)
Bathing Beaches/standards , Ecosystem , Public Health/standards , Water Microbiology/standards , Water Pollution/prevention & control , Bathing Beaches/economics , Bathing Beaches/legislation & jurisprudence , European Union , Fresh Water , Government Regulation , Humans , Public Health/economics , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Recreation , United States , Water Pollution/economics , Water Pollution/legislation & jurisprudence
3.
PLoS One ; 10(6): e0126681, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26053674

ABSTRACT

Jellyfish outbreaks and their consequences appear to be on the increase around the world, and are becoming particularly relevant in the Mediterranean. No previous studies have quantified tourism losses caused by jellyfish outbreaks. We used a stated-choice questionnaire and a Random Utility Model to estimate the amount of time respondents would be willing to add to their journey, in terms of reported extra travel time, in order to reduce the risk of encountering jellyfish blooms in the Catalan coast. The estimation results indicated that the respondents were willing to spend on average an additional 23.8% of their travel time to enjoy beach recreation in areas with a lower risk of jellyfish blooms. Using as a reference the opportunity cost of time, we found that the subsample of individuals who made a trade-off between the disutility generated by travelling longer in order to lower the risk of jellyfish blooms, and the utility gained from reducing this risk, are willing to pay on average €3.20 per beach visit. This estimate, combined with the respondents' mean income, yielded annual economic gains associated with reduction of jellyfish blooms on the Catalan coast around €422.57 million, or about 11.95% of the tourism expenditures in 2012. From a policy-making perspective, this study confirms the importance of the economic impacts of jellyfish blooms and the need for mitigation strategies. In particular, providing daily information using social media applications or other technical devices may reduce these social costs. The current lack of knowledge about jellyfish suggests that providing this information to beach recreationists may be a substantially effective policy instrument for minimising the impact of jellyfish blooms.


Subject(s)
Bathing Beaches/economics , Choice Behavior , Eutrophication , Recreation/economics , Scyphozoa/growth & development , Animals , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
4.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 91(1): 65-72, 2015 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25561004

ABSTRACT

The sinking of the Don Pedro merchant ship in 2007 near the island of Ibiza is a good example of the extreme sensitivity of the tourism sector to oil spills. Despite the limited scale of the spill (only some 20 tonnes), its minimal ecological impact, and the rapid deployment of personnel and equipment to contain it, the accident nonetheless caused significant economic damage to the island's tourism sector. This particular case demonstrates the importance of the beach as a factor of production in the holiday tourism sector, and the capacity of even small amounts of oil to render it unusable and cause heavy losses to holiday firms.


Subject(s)
Bathing Beaches/economics , Petroleum Pollution/economics , Ships , Travel/economics , Bathing Beaches/history , History, 21st Century , Petroleum Pollution/history , Spain
5.
Geogr Rev ; 102(1): 17-34, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22530262

ABSTRACT

Despite the fortification of buildings, streets, and public squares, Rio de Janeiro's beaches remain widely regarded as democratic spaces of social diversity and accessibility. Our study revisits the question of Rio's "democratic" beachfronts, based on local interviews, field observations, official reports, and newspaper accounts. We focus on historical and contemporary perceptions of planning, privatization, and public-order programs on the city's southern seaside. Institutional discourses have justified increasing regulation to combat threats of disorder and insecurity. While residents value the relative openness of beachfronts, they also acknowledge issues of safety, social segmentation, and subtle forms of bias. The public generally applauds recent "Shock of Order" policing and commercial revitalization, although critics lament the loss of traditional freedoms for informal beach vendors and casual sports. These paradoxes highlight enduring tensions between social order and hierarchy on one hand, and democratic rights and equality on the other.


Subject(s)
Bathing Beaches , Cities , Government Regulation , Public Facilities , Public Health , Urbanization , Bathing Beaches/economics , Bathing Beaches/history , Bathing Beaches/legislation & jurisprudence , Brazil/ethnology , Cities/economics , Cities/ethnology , Cities/history , Cities/legislation & jurisprudence , Conservation of Natural Resources/economics , Conservation of Natural Resources/history , Conservation of Natural Resources/legislation & jurisprudence , Government Regulation/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Local Government/history , Population Dynamics/history , Public Facilities/economics , Public Facilities/history , Public Facilities/legislation & jurisprudence , Public Health/economics , Public Health/education , Public Health/history , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Urbanization/history , Urbanization/legislation & jurisprudence
6.
Environ Manage ; 44(1): 185-204, 2009 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19471999

ABSTRACT

An adaptation of the Drivers-Pressure-State-Impact-Response methodology is presented in this work. The differential DPSIR (DeltaDPSIR) was developed to evaluate impacts on the coastal environment and as a tool for integrated ecosystem management. The aim of the DeltaDPSIR is to provide scientifically-based information required by managers and decision-makers to evaluate previously adopted policies, as well as future response scenarios. The innovation of the present approach is to provide an explicit link between ecological and economic information related to the use and management of a coastal ecosystem within a specific timeframe. The application of DeltaDPSIR is illustrated through an analysis of developments in a Southwest European coastal lagoon between 1985 and 1995. The value of economic activities dependent on the lagoon suffered a significant reduction (ca. -60%) over that period, mainly due to a decrease in bivalve production. During that decade the pressures from the catchment area were managed (ca. 176 million Euros), mainly through the building of waste water treatment plants. Notwithstanding this, the ecosystem state worsened with respect to abnormal clam mortalities due to a parasite infection and to benthic eutrophication symptoms in specific problematic areas. The negative economic impacts during the decade were estimated between -565 and -315 million Euros, of which 9-49% represent the cost of environmental externalities. Evaluation of these past events indicates that future management actions should focus on reducing the limitation on local clam seeds, which should result in positive impacts to both the local socio-economy and biodiversity.


Subject(s)
Conservation of Natural Resources/economics , Conservation of Natural Resources/methods , Ecosystem , Agriculture/economics , Agriculture/statistics & numerical data , Animals , Aquaculture/economics , Aquaculture/history , Aquaculture/statistics & numerical data , Bathing Beaches/economics , Bathing Beaches/statistics & numerical data , Bivalvia/metabolism , Bivalvia/pathogenicity , Conservation of Natural Resources/legislation & jurisprudence , Dinoflagellida/microbiology , Eutrophication , Fisheries/economics , Fisheries/statistics & numerical data , Geography/economics , Geologic Sediments/chemistry , History, 20th Century , Industry/economics , Industry/statistics & numerical data , Nitrogen/analysis , Oceans and Seas , Phosphorus/analysis , Recreation/economics , Seawater/chemistry
7.
Environ Res ; 108(2): 131-9, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18949831

ABSTRACT

Synthetic polymers, commonly known as plastics, have been entering the marine environment in quantities paralleling their level of production over the last half century. However, in the last two decades of the 20th Century, the deposition rate accelerated past the rate of production, and plastics are now one of the most common and persistent pollutants in ocean waters and beaches worldwide. Thirty years ago the prevailing attitude of the plastic industry was that "plastic litter is a very small proportion of all litter and causes no harm to the environment except as an eyesore" [Derraik, J.G.B., 2002. The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 44(9), 842-852]. Between 1960 and 2000, the world production of plastic resins increased 25-fold, while recovery of the material remained below 5%. Between 1970 and 2003, plastics became the fastest growing segment of the US municipal waste stream, increasing nine-fold, and marine litter is now 60-80% plastic, reaching 90-95% in some areas. While undoubtedly still an eyesore, plastic debris today is having significant harmful effects on marine biota. Albatross, fulmars, shearwaters and petrels mistake floating plastics for food, and many individuals of these species are affected; in fact, 44% of all seabird species are known to ingest plastic. Sea turtles ingest plastic bags, fishing line and other plastics, as do 26 species of cetaceans. In all, 267 species of marine organisms worldwide are known to have been affected by plastic debris, a number that will increase as smaller organisms are assessed. The number of fish, birds, and mammals that succumb each year to derelict fishing nets and lines in which they become entangled cannot be reliably known; but estimates are in the millions. We divide marine plastic debris into two categories: macro, >5 mm and micro, <5 mm. While macro-debris may sometimes be traced to its origin by object identification or markings, micro-debris, consisting of particles of two main varieties, (1) fragments broken from larger objects, and (2) resin pellets and powders, the basic thermoplastic industry feedstocks, are difficult to trace. Ingestion of plastic micro-debris by filter feeders at the base of the food web is known to occur, but has not been quantified. Ingestion of degraded plastic pellets and fragments raises toxicity concerns, since plastics are known to adsorb hydrophobic pollutants. The potential bioavailability of compounds added to plastics at the time of manufacture, as well as those adsorbed from the environment are complex issues that merit more widespread investigation. The physiological effects of any bioavailable compounds desorbed from plastics by marine biota are being directly investigated, since it was found 20 years ago that the mass of ingested plastic in Great Shearwaters was positively correlated with PCBs in their fat and eggs. Colonization of plastic marine debris by sessile organisms provides a vector for transport of alien species in the ocean environment and may threaten marine biodiversity. There is also potential danger to marine ecosystems from the accumulation of plastic debris on the sea floor. The accumulation of such debris can inhibit gas exchange between the overlying waters and the pore waters of the sediments, and disrupt or smother inhabitants of the benthos. The extent of this problem and its effects have recently begun to be investigated. A little more than half of all thermoplastics will sink in seawater.


Subject(s)
Ecosystem , Environmental Monitoring , Plastics , Water Pollutants, Chemical , Water Pollution/prevention & control , Animals , Bathing Beaches/economics , Bathing Beaches/legislation & jurisprudence , Bathing Beaches/standards , Biodegradation, Environmental , Environmental Monitoring/legislation & jurisprudence , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Environmental Monitoring/standards , Marine Biology , Oceans and Seas , Plastics/chemistry , Plastics/toxicity , Refuse Disposal/economics , Refuse Disposal/legislation & jurisprudence , Refuse Disposal/standards , Water Pollutants, Chemical/chemistry , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity
8.
Ambio ; 35(6): 289-96, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17240761

ABSTRACT

Sea-level rise, as a result of climate change, will likely inflict considerable economic consequences on coastal regions, particularly low-lying island states like Singapore. Although the literature has addressed the vulnerability of developed coastal lands, this is the first economic study to address nonmarket lands, such as beaches, marshes and mangrove estuaries. This travel cost and contingent valuation study reveals that consumers in Singapore attach considerable value to beaches. The contingent valuation study also attached high values to marshes and mangroves but this result was not supported by the travel cost study. Although protecting nonmarket land uses from sea-level rise is expensive, the study shows that at least highly valued resources, such as Singapore's popular beaches, should be protected.


Subject(s)
Economics , Greenhouse Effect , Wetlands , Animals , Bathing Beaches/economics , Child , Community Participation/economics , Conservation of Natural Resources/economics , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Male , Oceans and Seas , Singapore , Surveys and Questionnaires , Travel/economics
9.
Environ Sci Technol ; 38(10): 2737-45, 2004 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15212245

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a framework for analyzing the economic, health, and recreation implications of swim closures related to high fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) levels. The framework utilizes benefit transfer policy analysis to provide a practical procedure for estimating the effectiveness of recreational water quality policies. Evaluation criteria include the rates of intended and unintended management outcomes, whether the chosen protocols generate closures with positive net economic benefits to swimmers, and the number of predicted illnesses the policy is able to prevent. We demonstrate the framework through a case study of a Lake Michigan freshwater beach using existing water quality and visitor data from 1998 to 2001. We find that a typical closure causes a net economic loss among would-be swimmers totaling dollars 1274-37,030/day, depending on the value assumptions used. Unnecessary closures, caused by high indicator variability and a 24-h time delay between when samples are taken and the management decision can be made, occurred on 14 (12%) out of 118 monitored summer days. Days with high FIB levels when the swim area is open are also common but do relatively little economic harm in comparison. Also, even if the closure policy could be implemented daily and perfectly without error, only about 42% of predicted illnesses would be avoided. These conclusions were sensitive to the relative values and risk preferences that swimmers have for recreation access and avoiding health effects, suggesting a need for further study of the impacts of recreational water quality policies on individuals.


Subject(s)
Bathing Beaches/standards , Communicable Disease Control/standards , Escherichia coli , Fresh Water/microbiology , Policy Making , Swimming , Water Microbiology/standards , Bathing Beaches/economics , Communicable Disease Control/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/prevention & control , Guidelines as Topic , Indiana , Markov Chains , Michigan/epidemiology , Risk Assessment , Swimming/economics
10.
Arch Dermatol ; 139(8): 1003-6, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12925386

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the economic impact of sunburn in a beachgoing population during the summer. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: Galveston, Tex, beachfront. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 56 sunburned beachgoers. Intervention None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Days of work lost as a result of sunburn in the previous year. RESULTS: Thirty-eight respondents (68%) reported painful sunburn. Sunscreen use did not prevent painful sunburn (23/38 [60%]). Those consuming alcohol at the beach had more severe sunburns than nondrinkers and had a higher frequency of analgesic use after sunburn (69% vs 26%, P =.007). Five men (5/18 [28%]) and 4 women (4/38 [10%]) missed a total of 9 and 8 days of work, respectively, because of sunburn within the prior year. Based on these findings and attendant assumptions, it is estimated that sunburn may account for as many as 92 720 lost workdays by Galveston beachgoers each year. The annual economic impact for lost work and treatment may exceed $10 million. CONCLUSION: Sunburn is a costly and preventable skin injury.


Subject(s)
Absenteeism , Sunburn/economics , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Bathing Beaches/economics , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sick Leave/economics , Texas , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...