Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 228
Filter
1.
Fish Shellfish Immunol ; 151: 109713, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38914180

ABSTRACT

As an environmentally friendly alternative to antibiotics, bee venom holds promise for aquaculture due to its diverse health advantages, including immune-amplifying and anti-inflammatory features. This study investigated the effects of dietary bee venom (BV) on the growth and physiological performance of Thinlip mullet (Liza ramada) with an initial body weight of 40.04 ± 0.11 g for 60 days. Fish were distributed to five dietary treatments (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 mg BV/kg diet) with three replicates. Growth traits, gut enzyme ability (lipase, protease, amylase), intestinal and liver histology, blood biochemistry, immune responses [lysozyme activity (LYZ), bactericidal activity (BA), nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT%)], and antioxidant status [superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), malondialdehyde (MDA)] were evaluated. BV supplementation significantly improved growth performance, digestive enzyme activity, histological integrity of organs, immune responses (LYZ, BA), and antioxidant status (SOD, CAT, GPx), while declining MDA levels. Optimal BV levels were identified between 4.2 and 5.8 mg/kg diet for different parameters. Overall, the findings suggest that BV supplementation can enhance growth and physiological performance in Thinlip mullet, highlighting its potential as a beneficial dietary supplement for fish health and aquaculture management.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed , Aquaculture , Bee Venoms , Diet , Dietary Supplements , Smegmamorpha , Animals , Bee Venoms/pharmacology , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Animal Feed/analysis , Diet/veterinary , Dietary Supplements/analysis , Smegmamorpha/immunology , Immunity, Innate/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Random Allocation
2.
Am J Vet Res ; 85(9)2024 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901460

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Salmonella Typhimurium is a significant zoonotic concern for human food poisoning and a substantial economic burden in the swine industry. We previously reported that nasally delivered chitosan-coated poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) encapsulating honeybee venom (CP-HBV) could enhance CD4+ T helper 1 (Th1)-related immune responses in healthy pigs. Building upon these findings, the current study aimed to investigate the protective immune enhancement by nasally delivered CP-HBV in pigs challenged with S Typhimurium. ANIMALS: 36 healthy, 4-week-old, female, Landrace X Yorkshire X Duroc pigs. METHODS: 36 pigs were allocated into 3 groups: CP-HBV (n = 16), control (n = 16), and healthy baseline control (n = 4). CP-HBV and control groups were challenged with S Typhimurium 7 days post-treatment. Pigs from the healthy control group were sacrificed at 0 days postinfection (DPI), and 4 pigs from each of the control and CP-HBV groups were sacrificed at 1, 2, 4, and 7 DPI. Salmonella shedding, immune cell frequencies, cytokines, and transcriptional factor expression levels were measured. RESULTS: The CP-HBV group exhibited lower bacterial shedding and an enhanced Th1-related immune response characterized by an upregulation of CD4+ T cells and CD4+ Interferon-γ+ T cells, accompanied by increased expression of Th1-related cytokines and reduced expression of regulatory T cells and immunosuppressive cytokines compared to the control group. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: CP-HBV is a promising strategy for controlling Salmonella infections in pigs and improving public health.


Subject(s)
Bee Venoms , Chitosan , Salmonella Infections, Animal , Salmonella typhimurium , Swine Diseases , Animals , Chitosan/administration & dosage , Swine Diseases/prevention & control , Swine Diseases/immunology , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/prevention & control , Salmonella Infections, Animal/immunology , Swine , Female , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Bee Venoms/immunology , Administration, Intranasal/veterinary , Th1 Cells/immunology , Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer/chemistry , Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer/administration & dosage , Cytokines/metabolism
3.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 45(3): 195-200, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755779

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Hymenoptera venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the only therapy that protects patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy by preventing systemic reactions after a new sting. Various extracts for VIT are available and used. VIT administration consists of an induction phase and a maintenance phase. Depot preparations of Hymenoptera VIT extracts are typically used for cluster and conventional protocols, and the maintenance phase. Many patients with Hymenoptera allergy need to achieve tolerance quickly because of the high risk of re-sting and possible anaphylaxis. Objective: Our study aimed to show the safety and efficacy of an accelerated regimen with depot preparations on aluminum hydroxide by using relatively high starting doses in a heterogeneous group of patients. Methods: The research focused on a group of patients with a history of severe systemic reactions to Hymenoptera stings, with the necessity of swift immunization due to high occupational risks. Aluminum hydroxide depot extracts either of Vepula species or Apis mellifera extracts were used. Results: The induction protocol was started with the highest concentration of depot venom extract of 100,000 standard quality unit and was well tolerated by 19 of 20 patients. Onne patient presented with a mild systemic reaction during the accelerated induction schedule, which was promptly treated with intravenous steroids and intramuscular H1 antihistamine; when switched to a conventional induction protocol, he had a similar reaction but finally reached maintenance with an H1-antagonist premedication. Conclusion: If validated, the accelerated induction protocol by using depot aluminum adsorbed extracts with the highest concentration of venom from the beginning could offer a streamlined and accessible treatment modality for patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis from bee and wasp venoms in need of rapid desensitization.


Subject(s)
Desensitization, Immunologic , Hymenoptera , Humans , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Animals , Adult , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Hymenoptera/immunology , Aluminum Hydroxide , Insect Bites and Stings/immunology , Insect Bites and Stings/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult , Allergens/immunology , Allergens/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Arthropod Venoms/immunology , Aged , Bee Venoms/immunology , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Bee Venoms/adverse effects
4.
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) ; 108(3): 792-805, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38311831

ABSTRACT

The objectives of the present study were to investigate the potential effects of purified bee venom (BV) on various aspects of growth, carcass, antioxidant, intestinal bacterial count and economic considerations in rabbits. A total of 240 male rabbits, comprising two distinct breeds (V-Line and New Zealand White [NZW]), 5 weeks old, with an average live body weight (BW) of 680 ± 20 g, were randomly divided into six groups, each containing 30 rabbits. Each group had five replicates, with six rabbits in each replicate. The allocation of animals to the groups followed a fully factorial design, incorporating two factors: breed (V-Line and NZW) and four levels of purified BV derived from Apis Mellifera. The control group (G1) received a basal diet without additives. The other three groups (G2, G3 and G4) received the basal diet with BV supplementation in their drinking water at 0.5, 1 and 2 mg/L respectively. The study results indicated that NZW rabbits significantly enhanced feed conversion ratio while maintaining consistent carcass attributes compared to the V-Line breed. Despite variations in growth parameters being less pronounced, the supplementation of BV at levels of 1-2 mg/L demonstrated significant improvements in various other parameters. Notably, the interaction between the BV supplement and the breed factor (p < 0.001) yielded notable distinctions in most production metrics, encompassing BW, weight gain, feed conversion, carcass attributes and blood parameters. Increasing levels of BV supplementation, particularly at 1 mg/L, led to substantial improvements in serum and tissue metabolites. Moreover, the levels of total bacterial count and Escherichia coli in the jejunum and colon were significantly diminished, while the population of Lactobacilli in the colon was augmented (p < 0.001) in rabbits from both breeds receiving BV supplementation (1-2 mg/L) compared to the control group. The results underscore the potential of the BV supplement to enhance final weights, bolster antioxidant status and mitigate the presence of pathogenic bacteria, thereby contributing to enhanced economic efficiency in rabbits. Further inquiries are warranted to comprehensively investigate BV supplementation's potential advantages and limitations across different breeds and dosage levels.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Bee Venoms , Diet , Dietary Supplements , Animals , Male , Rabbits , Animal Feed/analysis , Bee Venoms/pharmacology , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Bee Venoms/chemistry , Diet/veterinary , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Weaning
5.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 2656, 2022 02 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35173181

ABSTRACT

Honeybee products consist of many substances, which have long been known for their medicinal and health-promoting properties. This study set out to appraise the protective potential of Egyptian propolis (EP) and bee venom (BV) separately or combined against total body irradiation (TBI) induced oxidative injury in rats. Besides, we assessed the bioactive components in EP and BV using HPLC and UPLC/ ESI-MS analysis in the positive ion mode. The animals were subjected to a source of gamma ionizing radiation at a dose of 6 Gy. Propolis and BV were administered independently and in combination before 14 days of γ-irradiation. Liver and kidney functions were estimated besides, DNA damage index (8- OHdG) by ELISA. Antioxidants, including glutathione (GSH), catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) were detected. Gene expression technique investigated for BAX, BCL2, and in plasma also miR125b expression in serum of rats. Besides, the histopathological for the brain, liver, kidney, and heart were investigated. In addition, lipid peroxidation was investigated in plasma and in the previous organs. The present results provide opportunities to advance the use of bee products as promising medicinal sources.


Subject(s)
Bee Venoms/pharmacology , Gamma Rays/adverse effects , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Oxidative Stress/radiation effects , Propolis/pharmacology , Radiation-Protective Agents , Animals , Antioxidants/metabolism , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Bee Venoms/chemistry , DNA Damage/drug effects , In Vitro Techniques , Propolis/administration & dosage , Propolis/chemistry , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/blood , Rats , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/blood , bcl-2-Associated X Protein/blood
6.
Toxins (Basel) ; 13(11)2021 11 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34822594

ABSTRACT

Bee venom (BV) is a typical toxin secreted by stingers of honeybee workers. BV and BV therapy have long been attractive to different cultures, with extensive studies during recent decades. Nowadays, BV is applied to combat several skin diseases, such as atopic dermatitis, acne vulgaris, alopecia, vitiligo, and psoriasis. BV is used extensively in topical preparations as cosmetics and used as dressing for wound healing, as well as in facemasks. Nevertheless, the safety of BV as a therapeutic choice has always been a concern due to the immune system reaction in some people due to BV use. The documented unfavorable impact is explained by the fact that the skin reactions to BV might expand to excessive immunological responses, including anaphylaxis, that typically resolve over numerous days. This review aims to address bee venom therapeutic uses in skin cosmetics.


Subject(s)
Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Cosmetics/administration & dosage , Skin Diseases/drug therapy , Administration, Cutaneous , Animals , Bee Venoms/adverse effects , Bees , Cosmetics/adverse effects , Humans , Skin Diseases/pathology , Wound Healing/drug effects
7.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 21141, 2021 10 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34707203

ABSTRACT

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive chronic neurodegenerative condition characterized by the loss of dopaminergic neurons within the substantia nigra. Current PD therapeutic strategies are mainly symptomatic and can lead to motor complications overtime. As a result, alternative medicine may provide an effective adjuvant treatment for PD as an addition to or as a replacement of the conventional therapies. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effects of Bee Venom (BV) and dopamine (DA)-loaded nanoparticles in a reserpine-induced animal model of PD. After inducing PD with reserpine injection, different groups of male rats were treated with L-Dopa, BV, DA-nanoparticles. Our findings showed that BV and DA-nanoparticles administration restored monoamines, balanced glutamate/GABA levels, halted DNA fragmentation, decreased pro-inflammatory mediators (IL-1ß and TNF-α), and elevated anti-inflammatory mediators (PON1) and neurotropic factor (BDNF) levels in comparison with conventional therapy of PD. Furthermore, in a reserpine-induced PD rat model, the ameliorative effects of BV were significantly superior to that of DA-nanoparticles. These findings imply that BV and DA-nanoparticles could be useful as adjuvant treatments for PD.


Subject(s)
Antiparkinson Agents/therapeutic use , Bee Venoms/therapeutic use , Dopamine/therapeutic use , Nanoparticles , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Animals , Antiparkinson Agents/administration & dosage , Antiparkinson Agents/pharmacology , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Bee Venoms/pharmacology , Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/metabolism , DNA Fragmentation , Dopamine/administration & dosage , Dopamine/pharmacology , Dopaminergic Neurons/drug effects , Dopaminergic Neurons/metabolism , Interleukin-1beta/metabolism , Male , Parkinson Disease/etiology , Rats , Reserpine/toxicity , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/metabolism , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid/metabolism
8.
Toxins (Basel) ; 13(5)2021 05 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34067049

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers in men. Despite the development of a variety of therapeutic agents to treat either metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, advanced prostate cancer, or nonmetastatic/metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, the progression or spread of the disease often cannot be avoided. Additionally, the development of resistance of prostate cancer cells to available therapeutic agents is a well-known problem. Despite extensive and cost-intensive research over decades, curative therapy for metastatic prostate cancer is still not available. Therefore, additional therapeutic agents are still needed. The animal kingdom offers a valuable source of natural substances used for the treatment of a variety of diseases. Bee venom of the honeybee is a mixture of many components. It contains proteins acting as enzymes such as phospholipase A2, smaller proteins and peptides such as melittin and apamin, phospholipids, and physiologically active amines such as histamine, dopamine, and noradrenaline. Melittin has been shown to induce apoptosis in different cancer cell lines, including prostate cancer cell lines. It also influences cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and necrosis as well as motility, migration, metastasis, and invasion of tumour cells. Hence, it represents an interesting anticancer agent. In this review article, studies about the effect of bee venom components on prostate cancer cells are discussed. An electronic literature research was performed utilising PubMed in February 2021. All scientific publications, which examine this interesting subject, are discussed. Furthermore, the different types of application of these promising substances are outlined. The studies clearly indicate that bee venom or melittin exhibited anticancer effects in various prostate cancer cell lines and in xenografts. In most of the studies, a combination of bee venom or the modified melittin with another molecule was utilised in order to avoid side effects and, additionally, to target selectively the prostate cancer cells or the surrounding tissue. The studies showed that systemic side effects and unwanted damage to healthy tissue and organs could be minimised when the anticancer drug was not activated until binding to the cancer cells or the surrounding tissue. Different targets were used, such as the matrix metalloproteinase 2, hormone receptors expressed by prostate cancer cells, the extracellular domain of PSMA, and the fibroblast activation protein occurring in the stroma of prostate cancer cells. Another approach used loaded phosphate micelles, which were cleaved by the enzyme secretory phospholipase A2 produced by prostate cancer cells. In a totally different approach, targeted nanoparticles containing the melittin gene were used for prostate cancer gene therapy. By the targeted nonviral gene delivery, the gene encoding melittin was delivered to the prostate cancer cells without systemic side effects. This review of the scientific literature reveals totally different approaches using bee venom, melittin, modified melittin, or protoxin as anticancer agents. The toxic agents acted through several different mechanisms to produce their anti-prostate cancer effects. These mechanisms are not fully understood yet and more experimental studies are necessary to reveal the complete mode of action. Nevertheless, the researchers have conducted pioneering work. Based on these results, further experimental and clinical studies about melittin and modifications of this interesting agent deriving from nature are necessary and could possibly lead to a complementary treatment option for prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Bee Venoms/pharmacology , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Apamin/isolation & purification , Apamin/pharmacology , Apoptosis/drug effects , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Bee Venoms/chemistry , Bees , Humans , Male , Melitten/isolation & purification , Melitten/pharmacology , Phospholipases A2/isolation & purification , Phospholipases A2/pharmacology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology
9.
Open Vet J ; 11(1): 70-79, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33898286

ABSTRACT

Background: Male infertility has been on the rise since the past seven decades. Recently, in Libya, bee venom therapy (BVT) has become a popular method among alternative healthcare practitioners for treating male infertility. However, a literature search did not find any published studies that investigated the use of BVT for infertility treatment. Aim: To investigate the effect of bee venom on the male reproductive status through measurements of semen quality parameters and testicular histological changes in adult male mice. Methods: A total of 48 male mice were randomly divided into three experimental groups (which were subdivided into two subgroups with eight mice each) as follows: control, bee venom sting (BVS), and bee venom injection (BVI). The normal control subgroup mice were not subjected to any treatment, while the vehicle control subgroup mice were injected (i.p.) with 200 µl of 0.9% saline solution. In the BVS-treated subgroups, each mouse was stung by one live bee for five times (BVS-5) or seven times (BVS-7) every third day for 2 or 3 weeks. While each mouse in the BVI-treated subgroups received 23 µg/kg in a dose volume of 200 µl BVIs (i.p.) for five times (BVI-5) or seven times (BVI-7) every third day for 15 or 21 days. Results: The findings of this study showed that repeated bee venom treatment by sting or injection to adult male mice resulted in a significant decline in testosterone levels, sperm count, sperm motility, and a very significant increase in the percentage of abnormal sperm morphology; also, there were harmful testicular histological changes in the structural organization of seminiferous tubules and degenerative changes in the germinal epithelium compared to control group. Conclusion: The results of this study provide evidence for the low semen quality and adverse testicular histological changes in male mice treated with bee venom. Hence, there is a desperate need for educating alternative healthcare practitioners and infertile couples about the harmful effects of BVT on reproductive status.


Subject(s)
Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Fertility Agents, Male/administration & dosage , Mice/physiology , Semen Analysis , Testis/drug effects , Animals , Bee Venoms/adverse effects , Bee Venoms/pharmacology , Fertility Agents, Male/adverse effects , Fertility Agents, Male/pharmacology , Injections, Intraperitoneal/statistics & numerical data , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Male , Random Allocation , Testis/anatomy & histology , Testis/physiology
11.
Toxins (Basel) ; 12(12)2020 12 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33291335

ABSTRACT

Vincristine is a vinca alkaloid anti-mitotic drug with a broad spectrum of effects on solid and hematologic cancers. The major dose-limiting factor of this anti-cancer regimen is painful peripheral neuropathy. However, no gold-standard analgesic option has been used clinically. In this study, we investigated the effects and mechanism of bee venom acupuncture (BVA) to alleviate peripheral neuropathic pain induced by repeated intraperitoneal infusions of vincristine (1 mg/kg/day, days 1-5 and 8-12) in rats. Subcutaneous injection with bee venom (BV, 1.0 mg/kg) at the ST36 acupoint ameliorated cold and mechanical hypersensitivity (i.e., aberrant withdrawal responses in acetone drop and von Frey hair tests, respectively). In vivo extracellular recording demonstrated that BVA inhibited cutaneous cold (acetone) and mechanical (brush, press, and pinch) stimuli-elicited abnormal hyperexcitation of the spinal wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons in vincristine-treated rats. In addition, the microinjection of lidocaine into the ipsilateral locus coeruleus or the antagonism of the spinal α2-adrenergic receptors clearly reversed the effects of BVA on cold and mechanical hypersensitivity, indicating a vital role of the descending noradrenergic modulation in analgesia. These findings suggest that BVA could be a potential therapeutic option for vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Points , Adrenergic Neurons/drug effects , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/drug therapy , Vincristine/toxicity , Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Adrenergic Neurons/metabolism , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/toxicity , Male , Microinjections/methods , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/metabolism , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley
12.
Toxins (Basel) ; 12(10)2020 09 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32998357

ABSTRACT

Paclitaxel, a primary chemotherapeutic agent used to treat numerous solid malignancies, is commonly associated with debilitating peripheral neuropathy. However, a satisfactory gold-standard monotherapy for this neuropathic pain is not currently available. A combination strategy of two or more medications with different properties may achieve more beneficial effects than monotherapy. Thus, we investigated the analgesic efficacies and spinal mechanisms of the combination strategy, including bee venom acupuncture (BVA) and venlafaxine (VLX) against paclitaxel-induced allodynia in mice. Four intraperitoneal infusions of paclitaxel on alternating days (2 mg/kg/day) induced cold and mechanical allodynia for at least 1 week as assessed using acetone and the von Frey hair test, respectively. Co-treatment of BVA (1.0 mg/kg, s.c., ST36) with VLX (40 mg/kg, i.p.) at the medium dose produced a longer-lasting and additive effect than each monotherapy at the highest dose (BVA, 2.5 mg/kg; VLX, 60 mg/kg). Spinal pre-administration of idazoxan (α2-adrenergic receptor antagonist, 10 µg), methysergide (mixed 5-HT1/5-HT2 receptor antagonist, 10 µg), or MDL-72222 (5-HT3 receptor antagonist, 10 µg) abolished this analgesia. These results suggest that the combination therapy with BVA and VLX produces long-lasting and additive analgesic effects on paclitaxel-induced allodynia, via the spinal noradrenergic and serotonergic mechanism, providing a promising clinical strategy.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Analgesics/pharmacology , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Hyperalgesia/therapy , Pain Threshold/drug effects , Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Spinal Cord/drug effects , Venlafaxine Hydrochloride/pharmacology , Animals , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease Models, Animal , Hyperalgesia/chemically induced , Hyperalgesia/metabolism , Hyperalgesia/physiopathology , Male , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Paclitaxel , Spinal Cord/metabolism , Spinal Cord/physiopathology
13.
Toxins (Basel) ; 12(10)2020 09 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32992601

ABSTRACT

Bee venom is a complex natural mixture with various pharmaceutical properties. Among these properties, its peptides and enzymes have potential medical therapy for pain relief and inflammation. In clinical settings, this therapy has been used widely to treat diseases by injecting into acupoints. In this article, we have conducted various research from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Key from inception of July 2020. The results revealed that bee venom therapy has been reported effective in anti-inflammatory, antiapoptosis, and analgesic effects. Moreover, bee venom acupuncture has been commonly used for clinical disorders such as Parkinson disease, neuropathic pain, Alzheimer disease, intervertebral disc disease, spinal cord injury, musculoskeletal pain, arthritis, multiple sclerosis, skin disease and cancer.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Points , Acupuncture Therapy , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Acupuncture Therapy/adverse effects , Animals , Bee Venoms/adverse effects , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Injections , Treatment Outcome
14.
Toxins (Basel) ; 12(9)2020 08 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32872552

ABSTRACT

Bee venom has been used to treat many diseases because of its anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects. However, the secretions of bee venom can also cause life-threatening adverse reactions. The objective of this paper was to review the clinical effectiveness of bee venom and adverse events induced by bee venom, regardless of the disease. Four electronic databases were searched in April 2020. The reference lists of the retrieved articles and previous review articles were also hand-searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using any type of bee venom other than live bee stings for the clinical treatment of any disease other than cancer were included. The studies were selected, the data were extracted, and the quality of the studies was assessed by two authors. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias standards. Twelve RCTs were included in this review-three on Parkinson's disease, four on arthralgia, four on musculoskeletal disorders, and one on polycystic ovary syndrome. The types of bee venom used were acupuncture injections, ultrasound gel, and an ointment. Six studies reported adverse events, and skin reactions such as pruritus and swelling were the most common. The large-scale clinical trials of bee venom therapy are needed to verify the statistical difference, and the reporting system for adverse events is also required to increase the safety of bee venom therapy.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Points , Acupuncture Therapy , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Acupuncture Therapy/adverse effects , Administration, Cutaneous , Adult , Bee Venoms/adverse effects , Female , Gels , Humans , Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Ointments , Phonophoresis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
15.
Pharmacology ; 105(11-12): 692-704, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32640454

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a causative relation between the increased hepatic steatohepatitis prevalence and sweeteners intake, fructose in particular. Despite an increasing understanding of the mechanisms of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) pathogenesis, there are no drugs approved for it. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the effect of bee venom (BV) treatment on the fructose-induced NASH in rats and demonstrate its possible molecular mechanisms. METHODS: NASH was induced in rats by 10% fructose in drinking water for 8 weeks. BV was administered (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) 3 times per week during the last 2 weeks of the experiment. Sera were used for the determination of lipids, cholesterol, glucose, insulin, and liver enzymes. Hepatic gene expressions of farnesoid X receptor (FXR)α and the liver X receptor (LXR) were determined. Hepatic sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP)1/2, oxidative stress, and inflammation parameters were measured. Liver parts were used for histopathological examination. Small intestine was removed for the determination of tight junction proteins. RESULTS: Fructose caused overt histological damage in the liver, and this was associated with parallel changes in all parameters measured. BV effectively prevented these changes, presumably through amelioration of hepatic SREBP1/2, LXR, and FXRα expression as well as intestinal tight junction proteins. CONCLUSION: These findings support the therapeutic usefulness of BV, a remedy with a favorable safety profile, in the prevention of fructose-induced NASH.


Subject(s)
Bee Venoms/pharmacology , Liver/drug effects , Liver/metabolism , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/metabolism , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/prevention & control , Animals , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Disease Models, Animal , Fructose/pharmacology , Glucose/metabolism , Insulin/metabolism , Lipid Metabolism/drug effects , Liver/pathology , Liver Function Tests , Liver X Receptors/biosynthesis , Liver X Receptors/drug effects , Male , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/blood , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/chemically induced , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear/biosynthesis , Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear/drug effects , Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 1/drug effects , Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Protein 2/drug effects , Tight Junction Proteins/drug effects
16.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(18): e19975, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32358370

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bee venom acupuncture has been used in treating patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis, yet the effectiveness and safety remains unclear. Therefore, this systematic review will aim to assess the effectiveness and safety of bee venom acupuncture for shoulder adhesive capsulitis. METHODS: Electronic databases including EMBASE, PUBMED, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, Wanfang Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database will be searched for relevant randomized controlled trials from their inception to the search data without language and publication status. Randomized controlled trials involving bee venom acupuncture for treating shoulder adhesive capsulitis will be included. The primary outcome will be pain visual analogue scale, and secondary outcomes include active and passive range of motions, shoulder pain and disability index. Meta-analysis will be conducted using Review Manager software (V.5.3). The results will be presented as risk ratio for dichotomous data, and standardized or weighted mean difference for continuous data. RESULTS: The results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal publication. CONCLUSION: These systematic review findings will provide an evidence of bee venom acupuncture for shoulder adhesive capsulitis, and help to inform clinical practitioners and policy-makers in the decision-making. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval and patient consent are not required as this study is a systematic review based on published articles.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Bursitis/therapy , Acupuncture Therapy/adverse effects , Bee Venoms/adverse effects , Disability Evaluation , Humans , Pain Measurement , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Range of Motion, Articular , Research Design , Meta-Analysis as Topic
17.
Microsc Microanal ; 25(5): 1234-1245, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31526405

ABSTRACT

In this study, we characterized secretory granules in somatotroph (STCs) and corticotroph (CTCs) cells from the anterior pituitary of rats, in conjunction with different experimental treatments with bee venom (BV). In the rats injected for 30 days with daily BV doses equivalent to one sting, we found significant changes in secretory granules' diameter: reduced by 48.15% in STCs and increased by 5.09% in CTCs, and especially a shift to gray into their intensity profile: increased by 237.04% in STCs and by 212.38% in CTCs. In the rats injected with a single high BV dose, the granules' diameter was reduced in both STCs (by 7.14%) and CTCs (by 4.67%-significant) and their gray intensity profile increased by 200% in STCs and by 51.71% in CTCs (both are significant). The changes in the gray profile reflected a reduced content of granules in the cells, consistent with an increase of the plasma levels of GH and ACTH in all cases. We concluded that the reduced hormone cargo of granules in STCs and CTCs resulted from an accelerated cell secretion. The results obtained for the two types of cells correlated, indicating a similar reaction of these secretory cells to the prolonged and acute presence of BV in the organism.


Subject(s)
Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Bodily Secretions/drug effects , Corticotrophs/drug effects , Hormones/metabolism , Somatotrophs/drug effects , Animals , Rats , Secretory Vesicles/metabolism
18.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 144(2): 504-513.e16, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31300280

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to Hymenoptera insect stings remain a major global clinical problem. Although effective, parenteral desensitization regimens require use of costly venom extracts and require frequent visits over extended periods of time. OBJECTIVE: Adjuvants are commonly used to enhance the efficacy of infectious disease vaccines, and this study asked whether Advax (Vaxine Pty Ltd, Adelaide, Australia), a novel noninflammatory polysaccharide adjuvant, might provide similar benefits for allergy desensitization. METHODS: A randomized, controlled phase 1/2 trial was undertaken in 27 adults with a history of rapid-onset systemic allergic reactions to honeybee stings and positive specific IgE levels to evaluate the safety and efficacy of honeybee venom immunotherapy (HBVIT) combined with Advax adjuvant. Venom immunotherapy (VIT) was administered monthly for 30 months after achievement of maintenance doses. RESULTS: Advax-adjuvanted HBVIT was well tolerated. Around week 14 of VIT, specific IgG4 responses peaked in both groups but increased earlier, peaked higher, and were better maintained through the end of the study in the Advax-adjuvanted arm. Several different patterns of serologic response to VIT were seen; some subjects had a dominant IgG4 response, some had a combined IgG4 and IgG1 response, and some had an exclusively IgG1 response. In some subjects specific IgE levels increased during the induction phase and then decreased, whereas in others specific IgE levels progressively decreased from the start of VIT. CONCLUSION: Advax adjuvant favorably enhanced the immunogenicity of HBVIT, with an early and prolonged switch to specific IgG4 production. The ability of Advax adjuvant to enhance VIT efficacy warrants further study.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Hypersensitivity , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunotherapy , Insect Bites and Stings , Inulin/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Hypersensitivity/pathology , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Insect Bites and Stings/immunology , Insect Bites and Stings/pathology , Insect Bites and Stings/therapy , Inulin/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged
19.
J Altern Complement Med ; 25(8): 845-855, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31274334

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To evaluate purified honey bee (Apis mellifera) venom (HBV) biotherapy for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) knee pain and physical function. Design and Patients: Five hundred and thirty-eight patients with Kellgren/Lawrence grade 1-3 radiographic knee OA and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain score ≥2 were randomized 1:2 to either control ("histamine") or HBV in this double-blind study. Interventions: After a dose escalation period, patients received 12 weekly dermal injections of control ("histamine") or HBV. At each of the 12 weekly visits, a set of 15 dermal injections (each containing 2.75 µg histamine or 100 µg HBV) were administered at prespecified acupuncture points (5 on each knee: knee top, eye-1 medial, eye-2 lateral, ST 34, BL 40 and 5 near the spinous processes: BL 19, 21, 23, 25, and 27). Outcome Measures: Assessments included WOMAC pain and physical function subscales, visual analog scale (VAS), patient global assessment (PGA), and physician global assessment (PhGA). Rescue medication use (acetaminophen) and routine safety parameters were monitored. Results: HBV biotherapy demonstrated a highly significant improvement over control in WOMAC pain score after 12 weeks (1.1 U mean difference; confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.3-2.0; analysis of covariance [ANCOVA] p = 0.0010 with baseline as covariate) that was also sustained 4 weeks post-treatment. Furthermore, WOMAC physical function was significantly improved over control with HBV (3.1 U mean difference; 95% CI: 0.3-5.9; ANCOVA p = 0.0046), and sustained 4 weeks post-treatment. VAS scores were significantly improved with HBV versus control, as well as PGA and PhGA evaluations, which showed that patients responded more favorably ("very good/good") to their overall OA condition (82.0% vs. 62.4% [p = 0.0001] and 82.1% vs. 54.9% [p = 0.0015], respectively). Use of rescue acetaminophen was similar between the groups (77%-78% of patients). HBV was associated with higher incidence of injection site reactions (<5%); however, the overall safety profiles were comparable between the treatment groups. Conclusions: This phase 3 trial demonstrated that HBV biotherapy resulted in significant improvements in knee OA pain and physical function.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Points , Bee Venoms , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Aged , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Arthralgia/therapy , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Bee Venoms/adverse effects , Bee Venoms/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Injections, Intradermal , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Pain Measurement
20.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 180(2): 128-134, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31216540

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is considered to be the gold-standard treatment for patients with Hymenoptera venom allergy. Data regarding VIT in bee venom (BV) allergic patients are scarce. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of VIT in patients with exclusive BV allergy and to try to define risk factors for VIT-induced systemic reactions (VIT-ISR) and VIT failure. METHODS: This is a retrospective study including data from all BV allergic patients that were treated by VIT in the Allergy Unit at the Meir Medical Center in the years 1995-2018. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-seven patients with exclusive BV allergy were included; 206 (83.4%) preferred to undergo rush buildup. Sixty-nine patients (27.9%) had at least 1 reaction during buildup, with the c-kit mutation being the only significant risk factor (100 vs. 28.9%, p = 0.02). Female gender (25.4 vs. 13.3%, p = 0.04), conventional buildup schedule (26.8 vs. 14.1%, p = 0.04), and c-kit mutation (100 vs. 16.8%, p < 0.01) but not tryptase level were found to be significantly more frequent in recurrent reactors. Females (20.3 vs. 9%, p = 0.03), patients with severe systemic reaction to the index sting (24.3 vs. 9.5%, p = 0.004), and c-kit mutation (66 vs. 12%, p = 0.05) but not tryptase level were found to be risk factors for severe systemic reactions. CONCLUSION: Despite the considerably high rate of VIT-ISR in patients with exclusive BV allergy, VIT can be performed safely and efficiently. C-kit mutation, and not basal serum tryptase level, seems to be a preferable biomarker for VIT-ISR in these patients.


Subject(s)
Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Bee Venoms/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/therapy , Insect Bites and Stings/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Animals , Bees , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tryptases/blood , Wasp Venoms/immunology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL