Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
3.
ACS Chem Neurosci ; 9(10): 2307-2330, 2018 10 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29342356

ABSTRACT

Humankind has used and abused psychoactive drugs for millennia. Formally, a psychoactive drug is any agent that alters cognition and mood. The term "psychotropic drug" is neutral and describes the entire class of substrates, licit and illicit, of interest to governmental drug policy. While these drugs are prescribed for issues ranging from pain management to anxiety, they are also used recreationally. In fact, the current opioid epidemic is the deadliest drug crisis in American history. While the topic is highly politicized with racial, gender, and socioeconomic elements, there is no denying the toll drug mis- and overuse is taking on this country. Overdose, fueled by opioids, is the leading cause of death for Americans under 50 years of age, killing ca. 64,000 people in 2016. From a chemistry standpoint, the question is in what ways, if any, did organic chemists contribute to this problem? In this targeted review, we provide brief historical accounts of the main classes of psychoactive drugs and discuss several foundational total syntheses that ultimately provide the groundwork for producing these molecules in academic, industrial, and clandestine settings.


Subject(s)
Central Nervous System Stimulants/chemical synthesis , Hallucinogens/chemical synthesis , Opiate Alkaloids/chemical synthesis , Psychotropic Drugs/chemical synthesis , Amphetamines/chemical synthesis , Amphetamines/chemistry , Amphetamines/history , Benzodiazepines/chemical synthesis , Benzodiazepines/chemistry , Benzodiazepines/history , Central Nervous System Stimulants/chemistry , Central Nervous System Stimulants/history , Cocaine/chemical synthesis , Cocaine/chemistry , Cocaine/history , Crack Cocaine/chemical synthesis , Crack Cocaine/chemistry , Crack Cocaine/history , Drug Industry , Drug Overdose/epidemiology , Drug Tolerance , Epidemics , Hallucinogens/chemistry , Hallucinogens/history , History, 19th Century , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , History, Ancient , Humans , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/chemical synthesis , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/chemistry , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine/history , Opiate Alkaloids/chemistry , Opiate Alkaloids/history , Opium/history , Oxycodone/chemical synthesis , Oxycodone/chemistry , Oxycodone/history , Psychotropic Drugs/chemistry , Psychotropic Drugs/history , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Synthetic Drugs/chemical synthesis , Synthetic Drugs/chemistry , Synthetic Drugs/history , United States/epidemiology
5.
Recenti Prog Med ; 106(6): 243-5, 2015 Jun.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26076412

ABSTRACT

The discovery of benzodiazepines has represented a milestone in the history of pharmacological treatments and in relation to the management of anxiety, sleep and other psychiatric disorders. After several decades, these agents still represent one of the largest and most widely prescribed groups of medications, not only in the psychiatric clinical practice, but also in the whole medical field. Over the last decade, however, multiple concerns have been raised on the risks related to the prescription of benzodiazepines, for their addictive potential and for cognitive side-effects. Therefore, benzodiazepines are today considered as a double-edge sword, which should be carefully handled and preferentially prescribed by specialists (or at least under their supervision), after an adequate training. Unfortunately, this is not the case in many situations, and the need to improve training on benzodiazepines management has been recently emphasized.


Subject(s)
Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Inappropriate Prescribing , Alzheimer Disease/chemically induced , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Benzodiazepines/history , History, 20th Century , Humans , Psychopharmacology/education , Sleep Wake Disorders/drug therapy
7.
Int J Risk Saf Med ; 25(3): 155-68, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24047687

ABSTRACT

AIM: Our objective was to explore communications from drug agencies about benzodiazepine dependence and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) withdrawal reactions over time. METHODS: Documentary study. We searched the web-sites of the European Medicines Agency and the drug agencies in USA, UK, and Denmark for documents mentioning benzodiazepines or SSRIs. We supplemented with other relevant literature that could contribute to our study. The searches were performed in 2009 in PubMed, Google, BMJ and JAMA. RESULTS: It took many years before the drug regulators acknowledged benzodiazepine dependence and SSRI withdrawal reactions and before the prescribers and the public were informed. Drug regulators relied mainly on the definitions of dependence and withdrawal reactions from the diagnostic psychiatric manuals, which contributed to the idea that SSRIs do not cause dependence, although it is difficult for many patients to stop treatment. In the perspective of a precautionary principle, drug agencies have failed to acknowledge that SSRIs can cause dependence and have minimised the problem with regard to its frequency and severity. In the perspective of a risk management principle, the drug agencies have reacted in concordance with the slowly growing knowledge of adverse drug reactions and have sharpened the information to the prescribers and the public over time. However, solely relying on spontaneous reporting of adverse effects leads to underestimation and delayed information about the problems. CONCLUSION: Given the experience with the benzodiazepines, we believe the regulatory bodies should have required studies from the manufacturers that could have elucidated the dependence potential of the SSRIs before marketing authorization was granted.


Subject(s)
Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/etiology , Substance-Related Disorders/etiology , Benzodiazepines/history , European Union , History, 20th Century , Humans , Legislation, Drug , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/history , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/history , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/psychology , United States
8.
Swiss Med Wkly ; 141: w13277, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22012428

ABSTRACT

Benzodiazepines are widely prescribed drugs used to treat anxiety and insomnia, induce muscle relaxation, control epileptic seizures, promote anaesthesia or produce amnesia. Benzodiazepines are also abused for recreational purposes and the number of benzodiazepine abusers is unfortunately increasing. Within weeks of chronic use, tolerance to the pharmacological effects can develop and withdrawal becomes apparent once the drug is no longer available, which are both conditions indicative of benzodiazepine dependence. Diagnosis of addiction (i.e. compulsive use despite negative consequences) may follow in vulnerable individuals. Here, we review the historical and current use of benzodiazepines from their original synthesis, discovery and commercialisation to the recent identification of the molecular mechanism by which benzodiazepines induce addiction. These results have identified the mechanisms underlying the activation of midbrain dopamine neurons by benzodiazepines, and how these drugs can hijack the mesocorticolimbic reward system. Such knowledge calls for future developments of new receptor subtype specific benzodiazepines with a reduced addiction liability.


Subject(s)
Benzodiazepines/pharmacology , Substance-Related Disorders/prevention & control , Benzodiazepines/history , Dopaminergic Neurons/drug effects , History, 20th Century , Humans , Mesencephalon/drug effects , Substance-Related Disorders/genetics
9.
J Anxiety Disord ; 25(4): 554-62, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21315551

ABSTRACT

The clinical introduction of chlordiazepoxide half a century ago was one of the major breakthroughs in the history of psychopharmacology, as it opened the door for the benzodiazepine saga, the pharmacological family par excellence in the treatment of anxiety disorders. This review analyses the discovery of this drug, which was filled with chance events, and numerous chemical and clinical errors of approach. Chlordiazepoxide, initially called methaminodiazepoxide, was patented in 1958 and introduced in clinical treatment in 1960 under the brand name Librium®. The benzodiazepines became the most widely prescribed drugs worldwide, provided truly effective treatment for "minor forms" (neuroses) of mental disorders for the first time, increased the quality of scientific methodology in clinical research, and enabled the development of new etiopathogenic theories for anxiety disorders, especially after the discovery in 1977 of their high-affinity receptor complex.


Subject(s)
Anti-Anxiety Agents/history , Anxiety Disorders/history , Benzodiazepines/history , Chlordiazepoxide/history , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Chlordiazepoxide/therapeutic use , History, 20th Century , Humans
10.
Arch Kriminol ; 228(5-6): 145-50, 2011.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22276365

ABSTRACT

Owing to the rapid progress in the development of synthetic pharmaceuticals, the classical knockout drugs such as chloroform and diethyl ether have been superseded by highly effective sedative and hypnotic drugs (e. g. methyprylone, clozapine and especially benzodiazepines). These are frequently given to the victim unnoticed by adding them to an alcoholic drink. In this way, alcohol still plays an important role as an interaction partner. The article presents relevant case examples together with their criminalistic background.


Subject(s)
Benzodiazepines/history , Drug Overdose/history , Hypnotics and Sedatives/history , Poisoning/history , Substance-Related Disorders/history , Female , Germany , History, 20th Century , Humans , Male
12.
Epilepsia ; 50(9): 2011-8, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19674049

ABSTRACT

The fortuitous discovery of the benzodiazepines and the subsequent application of these agents to the treatment of status epilepticus (SE) heralds in the modern age of treating this neurologic emergency. More than 50 years after their discovery, the benzodiazepines remain the drugs of first choice in the treatment of SE. However, the benzodiazepines can be ineffective, especially in those patients whose seizures are the most prolonged. The benzodiazepines act by increasing the affinity of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) for GABAA receptors. A receptor's subunit composition affects its functional and pharmacologic properties, trafficking, and cellular localization. The GABAA receptors that mediate synaptic inhibition typically contain a gamma2 subunit and are diazepam-sensitive. Among the GABAA receptors that mediate tonic inhibition are the benzodiazepine-insensitive delta subunit-containing receptors. The initial studies investigating the pathogenesis of SE demonstrated that a reduction in GABA-mediated inhibition within the hippocampus was important in maintenance of SE, and this reduction correlated with a rapid modification in the postsynaptic GABAA receptor population expressed on the surface of the hippocampal principal neurons. Subsequent studies found that this rapid modification is, in part, mediated by an activity-dependent, subunit-specific trafficking of the receptors that resulted in the reduction in the surface expression of the benzodiazepine-sensitive gamma2 subunit-containing receptors and the preserved surface expression of the benzodiazepine-insensitive delta subunit-containing receptors. This improved understanding of the changes in the trafficking of GABAA receptors during SE partially accounts for the development of benzodiazepine-pharmacoresistance and has implications for the current and future treatment of benzodiazepine-refractory SE.


Subject(s)
Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Diazepam/therapeutic use , Hippocampus/drug effects , Receptors, GABA-A/physiology , Status Epilepticus/drug therapy , Status Epilepticus/physiopathology , Animals , Benzodiazepines/history , Benzodiazepines/metabolism , Benzodiazepines/pharmacology , Diazepam/history , Drug Resistance , Endocytosis/drug effects , Endocytosis/physiology , Hippocampus/metabolism , Hippocampus/physiology , History, 20th Century , Humans , Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials/drug effects , Models, Neurological , Neural Inhibition/drug effects , Neural Inhibition/physiology , Neurons/drug effects , Neurons/metabolism , Rats , Receptors, GABA/drug effects , Receptors, GABA/metabolism , Receptors, GABA/physiology , Receptors, GABA-A/drug effects , Receptors, GABA-A/metabolism , Status Epilepticus/metabolism , Synaptic Transmission/drug effects
13.
Can Bull Med Hist ; 24(1): 93-112, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17644933

ABSTRACT

This article compares the careers of two families of 20th-century psychotropic drugs, the barbiturates and the benzodiazepines, in five different countries. Both families of drugs were used as so-called hypnotics and sedatives, and later as minor tranquillizers. In addition these drugs were extensively used as self-medication. The careers show a cyclical temporal course and generally encompass three phases: first, an expanding use of the drugs, accompanied by high expectations; then, rising criticism and disappointment; and finally contracting use and limited application. These phases need not have been sequential: they often overlapped. The cycle sometimes ended by the disappearance of the drug from mental health care, only to be replaced by new drugs with a profile of promise and hope. These cycles, which we term Seige cycles, are generally typical for the careers of psychotropic drugs. The analytical concept of the Seige cycle facilitates a comparative perspective on the commonalities as well as the differences between the various drug careers under consideration.


Subject(s)
Barbiturates/history , Benzodiazepines/history , Psychotropic Drugs/history , Europe , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , North America
14.
Yakugaku Zasshi ; 127(1): 217-24, 2007 Jan.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17202803

ABSTRACT

A biography of Leo Sternbach, an inventor of benzodiazepine tranquillizers, is presented. It consists of (1) a societal desire for lifestyle pills, (2) Leo's birth in 1908 and youth, (3) education, (4) in Vienna, (5) in Zurich, (6) at Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, (7) to the New World, (8) at Roche, Nutley NJ, (9) invention of the new drugs, (10) revolution of people's lifestyle, and (11) reward, retirement and obituary in 2005. This paper may be the first comprehensive biography of this remarkable chemist written in Japanese.


Subject(s)
Anti-Anxiety Agents/history , Benzodiazepines/history , Drug Design , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans
15.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 66 Suppl 2: 4-8, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15762813

ABSTRACT

Benzodiazepines have been used extensively for the treatment of anxiety and related disorders since the 1960s. Although they have been proven to be effective as first-line treatment for anxiety disorders, during the 1980s public perception and concern for abuse liability and physical dependence with long-term use gave rise to a great deal of controversy. Negative perceptions toward the use of benzodiazepines for treating anxiety not only caused severely ill patients to go untreated or under-treated but also called into question whether the illness itself was worthy of treatment. Although new pharmacologic and psychological treatments for anxiety are available, psychopharmacologists continue to endorse benzodiazepines as primary or adjunct treatment for anxiety disorders. The intent of this article is to provide a historic overview of these issues and to offer some general clinical principles to help minimize the risk of abuse and dependence with benzodiazepine use.


Subject(s)
Anti-Anxiety Agents/history , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Benzodiazepines/history , Anti-Anxiety Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety Disorders/history , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Attitude of Health Personnel , Attitude to Health , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , History, 20th Century , Humans , Psychopharmacology/history , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/etiology , Substance-Related Disorders/history
17.
Psiquiatr. biol ; 2(3): 31-8, nov. 1994. ilus, tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-194331

ABSTRACT

A Psicofarmacologia ainda busca hipnótico ideal. No entanto, observa-se evoluçäo desde os antigos babitúricos à nova geraçäo de hipnáticos. Entre esses dois tipos de substâncias se encontram as Benzodiazepinas (segunda geraçäo), compostos que servem de modelo farmacológico aos novos hipnóticos. Este artigo mostra algumas diferenças essenciais entre as Benzodiazepinas e hipnóticos de terceira geraçäo (Imidazopiridina e Ciclopirrolona). Os ensaios de laboratórios e clínico demonstram real avanço com os novos hipnóticos.


Subject(s)
Humans , Barbiturates/history , Benzodiazepines/history , Hypnotics and Sedatives/history , Benzodiazepines/pharmacology , gamma-Aminobutyric Acid , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology
18.
Psychopharmacology (Berl) ; 89(2): 138-44, 1986.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2873606

ABSTRACT

The four most frequently used groups of drugs in psychiatric therapy are: neuroleptics, antidepressants, anxiolytics, and lithium salts. Their introduction came largely during the past 3 decades. This review summarizes the history of the research that led to their discovery and to the present concept of their modes of action.


Subject(s)
Psychotropic Drugs/history , Animals , Anti-Anxiety Agents/history , Antidepressive Agents/history , Antipsychotic Agents/history , Benzodiazepines/history , Chlorpromazine/history , History, 20th Century , Humans , Lithium/history , Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors/history , Phenothiazines/history , Psychopharmacology/history
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...