Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol ; 119(3-4): 233-42, 2007 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17628699

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate skin immunopathology following gene gun delivery of plasmid-encoding interleukin 3 (pIL-3) and hence explore the possible mechanisms of its adjuvant activity. Using the sheep as the experimental model, expressible pIL-3 was administered to the epidermis and the dermal/epidermal junction and its effects on the skin were assessed by histopathology, immunohistology and quantitative RT-PCR for a range of pro-inflammatory and immune response polarizing cytokines. Delivery of both functional and non-functional plasmids caused an acute inflammatory response with the infiltration of neutrophils and micro-abscess formation; however, the response to pIL-3 was more severe and was also associated with an early (24 h) infiltration of B cells and a later accumulation of CD172a-/CD45RA+ dendritic cells (DC). In terms of cytokine transcript expression, an early TNFalpha response was stimulated by gene gun delivery of plasmid-associated gold beads, which coincided with an immediate infiltration of neutrophils. However, only pIL-3 triggered the short-lived expression of IL-3 (peaking at 6 h) and significant long-term increases in both TNFalpha and IL-1beta. pIL-3 did not affect the expression of the immune response polarizing cytokines, IL-10 and IL-12.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic , Biolistics/veterinary , Cytokines/genetics , Interleukin-3/immunology , Sheep Diseases/immunology , Skin Diseases/veterinary , Skin/pathology , Animals , Cytokines/metabolism , Female , Gene Expression Regulation , Interleukin-3/genetics , Leukocytes, Mononuclear , Plasmids/genetics , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/genetics , Sheep Diseases/pathology , Skin/immunology , Skin/metabolism , Skin Diseases/immunology , Skin Diseases/pathology
2.
Methods Mol Med ; 127: 91-105, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16988449

ABSTRACT

Currently, there are a number of obstacles barring effective immunization of large animal species with DNA-based vaccines. Generally, large concentrations of DNA and multiple doses are required before an effective immune response is detected. To overcome these impediments we have developed approaches to deliver the plasmids via needle-free methods, which have been shown to be more effective than traditional needle and syringe methods. Furthermore, we will describe the delivery of vaccines to mucosal surfaces. The procedures described will use sheep and cattle as model veterinary species.


Subject(s)
Biolistics/veterinary , Cattle , Sheep , Vaccination/veterinary , Vaccines, DNA/administration & dosage , Animals , Biolistics/instrumentation , Biolistics/methods , Cattle/immunology , Mucous Membrane/immunology , Plasmids/administration & dosage , Plasmids/immunology , Sheep/immunology , Vaccination/instrumentation , Vaccination/methods , Vaccines, DNA/immunology
3.
Am J Vet Res ; 63(5): 653-9, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12013464

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of DNA dose, site of vaccination, and coadministration of a cytokine DNA adjuvant on efficacy of H1-subtype swine influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) DNA vaccination of pigs. ANIMALS: 24 eight-week-old mixed-breed pigs. PROCEDURE: 2 doses of DNA were administered 27 days apart by use of a particle-mediated delivery system (gene gun). Different doses of HA DNA and different sites of DNA administration (skin, tongue) were studied, as was coadministration of porcine interleukin-6 (pIL-6) DNA as an adjuvant. Concentrations of virus-specific serum and nasal mucosal antibodies were measured throughout the experiment, and protective immunity was assessed after intranasal challenge with homologous H1N1 swine influenza virus. RESULTS: Increasing the dose of HA DNA, but not coadministration of pIL6 DNA, significantly enhanced virus-specific serum antibody responses. Pigs that received DNA on the ventral surface of the tongue stopped shedding virus 1 day sooner than pigs vaccinated in the skin of the ventral portion of the abdomen, but none of the vaccinated pigs developed detectable virus-specific antibodies in nasal secretions prior to challenge, nor were they protected from challenge exposure. Vaccinated pigs developed high virus-specific antibody concentrations after exposure to the challenge virus. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Co-administration of pIL-6 DNA did not significantly enhance immune responses to HA DNA vaccination or protection from challenge exposure. However, HA DNA vaccination of pigs, with or without coadministration of pIL-6 DNA, induced strong priming of the humoral immune system.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Interleukin-6/immunology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/veterinary , Orthomyxoviridae/immunology , Swine Diseases/immunology , Vaccination/veterinary , Vaccines, DNA/immunology , Adjuvants, Immunologic/metabolism , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/biosynthesis , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Biolistics/veterinary , Cohort Studies , Hemagglutinins, Viral/genetics , Hemagglutinins, Viral/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/standards , Interleukin-6/administration & dosage , Interleukin-6/genetics , Nasal Mucosa/immunology , Orthomyxoviridae/genetics , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/blood , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/immunology , Orthomyxoviridae Infections/virology , Swine , Swine Diseases/virology , Vaccines, DNA/administration & dosage , Vaccines, DNA/standards
4.
Fish Shellfish Immunol ; 10(8): 711-23, 2000 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11185755

ABSTRACT

The DNA vaccine, pIHNVw-G, contains the gene for the glycoprotein (G) of the rhabdovirus infectious hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV), a major pathogen of salmon and trout. The relative efficacy of various routes of immunisation with pIHNVw-G was evaluated using 1.8 g rainbow trout fry vaccinated via intramuscular injection, scarification of the skin, intraperitoneal injection, intrabuccal administration, cutaneous particle bombardment using a gene gun, or immersion in water containing DNA vaccine-coated beads. Twenty-seven days after vaccination neutralising antibody titres were determined, and 2 days later groups of vaccinated and control unvaccinated fish were subjected to an IHNV immersion challenge. Results of the virus challenge showed that the intramuscular injection and the gene gun immunisation induced protective immunity in fry, while intraperitoneal injection provided partial protection. Neutralising antibodies were not detected in sera of vaccinated fish regardless of the route of immunisation used, suggesting that cell mediated immunity may be at least partially responsible for the observed protection.


Subject(s)
Fish Diseases/immunology , Immunization/veterinary , Oncorhynchus mykiss , Rhabdoviridae Infections/veterinary , Rhabdoviridae/immunology , Viral Vaccines/standards , Administration, Buccal , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Biolistics/veterinary , Fish Diseases/prevention & control , Fish Diseases/virology , Immersion , Immunization/methods , Injections, Intramuscular/veterinary , Injections, Intraperitoneal/veterinary , Microspheres , Rhabdoviridae/genetics , Rhabdoviridae/growth & development , Rhabdoviridae Infections/immunology , Rhabdoviridae Infections/prevention & control , Skin/pathology , Survival Analysis , Vaccines, DNA , Viral Vaccines/administration & dosage , Viral Vaccines/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...