Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
J Med Ethics ; 40(12): 813-6, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24742881

ABSTRACT

Using ethnographic data lifted from an investigation into midwifery talk and practice in the South of England, this paper sets out to interrogate the ethics underpinning current admission policy for Free Standing (midwifery led) Birth Centres in the UK. The aim of this interrogation is to contest the grounds upon which birth centres admissions are managed, particularly the over-reliance on abstract calculations of risk--far removed from the material lived experience of the mother wishing to access these birth centre services.


Subject(s)
Birthing Centers/ethics , Health Policy , Health Services Accessibility/ethics , Patient Admission , Birthing Centers/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Patient Admission/legislation & jurisprudence , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , United Kingdom
2.
SEMERGEN, Soc. Esp. Med. Rural Gen. (Ed. impr.) ; 35(5): 214-220, mayo 2009. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-140849

ABSTRACT

Introducción: Nuestros objetivos son describir el perfil sociodemográfico de las embarazadas seguidas en el centro de salud, estimar la frecuencia de la utilización de los servicios sanitarios y analizar los factores que puedan influir en la diferente utilización. Pacientes y Métodos: Estudio descriptivo transversal con una segunda fase analítica. Centro de salud urbano. Población: embarazadas que hayan parido durante el año 2005. Variables: utilización de los servicios sanitarios, sociodemográficas, psicosociales, obstétricas y de morbilidad. Análisis estadístico: tablas de frecuencia para las variables cualitativas y resúmenes numéricos para las variables cuantitativas; análisis bivariante para relacionar cada variable independiente con cada una de las variables dependientes y creación de un modelo de regresión lineal multivariante para controlar los posibles factores de confusión. Resultados. Cuatrocientos diecinueve partos. El 64% de los embarazos se siguió en el centro, 25% en el segundo nivel y 11% en la medicina privada. La utilización media de los servicios sanitarios fue de 38,6 visitas (IC95% 37,31-39,89). Todas las mujeres acudieron al programa de control de embarazo: 7,37 visitas (IC95%: 7,24-7,50). El 98% acudió a la matrona (7,86 visitas; IC95% 15,03-16,93). El 99,6% utilizó los servicios de apoyo (media de 5,79 visitas; IC 95% 5,60-5,98). El 52% acudió a las urgencias hospitalarias (media de 0,84; IC95% 0,72-0,96). El 61% de las mujeres acudió en alguna ocasión al ginecólogo privado (media de 1,26; IC95% 1,08-1,44). Conclusiones. Se encuentra un elevado porcentaje de embarazos seguidos en Atención Primaria y una alta utilización de los servicios sanitarios durante el embarazo. La experiencia obstétrica previa parece disminuir la utilización (AU)


Introduction: We have aimed to describe the socidemographic profile of pregnant women followed-up in the health care center, estimate frequency of their use of the health care services and analyze the factors that may influence the different use. Patients and methods. Descriptive, cross-sectional study with the second analytic phase. Urban health care center. Population: pregnant women who gave birth in the year 2005. Variables: use of the health care, sociodemographics, psychosocial, obstetrics services and morbidity. Statistical analysis: frequency tables for qualitative variables and numeric summaries for the quantitative variables; bivariant analysis to compare each independent variable with each one of the dependent ones and creation of a multivariant linear regression model to control possible compounding factors. Results: Four-hundred and nineteen deliveries. A total of 64% of them were followed-up in the center, 25% were seen on the second level and 11% in private medicine. Mean use of the health care services was 38.6 visits (CI 95% 37.31-39.89). All the women came to a pregnancy control program: 7.37 visits (CI 95%: 7.24-7.50). A total of 98% came to the midwife (7.86 visits; CI 95% 15.03-16.93) and 99.6% used the support services (mean of 5.79 visits; CI 95% 5.60-5.98). A total of 52% came to the hospital emergency service (mean of 0.84; CI 95% 0.72-0.96). At some time, 61% of the women went to a private gynecologist (mean 1.26; CI 95% 1.08-1.44). Conclusions: A high percentage of pregnant women are followed-up in Primary Care. There is high use of the health care services during pregnancy. Previous obstetrics experience seems to decrease its use (AU)


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , /ethics , /methods , Birthing Centers/economics , Birthing Centers/ethics , /ethics , Cross-Sectional Studies/methods , /organization & administration , Birthing Centers , Birthing Centers , /classification , /economics , Primary Health Care , Primary Health Care/methods , Epidemiology, Descriptive
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL