Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Spec Oper Med ; 18(1): 77-80, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29533438

ABSTRACT

In support of Operation Enduring Freedom, American, North American Treaty Organization (NATO) Coalition, and Afghan forces worked together in training exercises and counterinsurgency operations. While serving at the NATO Role 3 Multinational Medical Unit, Kandahar, Afghanistan, numerous patients with explosive blast injuries (Coalition and Afghan security forces, and insurgents) were treated. A disparity was noted between the ocular injury patterns of US and Coalition forces in comparison with their Afghan counterparts, which were overwhelmingly influenced by the use, or lack thereof, of eye protection. Computed tomography imaging coupled, with a correlative clinical examination, demonstrated the spectrum of ocular injuries that can result from an explosive blast. Patient examination was performed by Navy radiologists and an ophthalmologist. A cultural analysis by was performed to understand why eye protection was not used, even if available to Afghan forces, by the injured patients in hope of bridging the gap between Afghan cultural differences and proper operational risk management of combat forces.


Subject(s)
Blast Injuries/ethnology , Eye Injuries/ethnology , Eye Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Afghan Campaign 2001- , Afghanistan/epidemiology , Blast Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Blast Injuries/epidemiology , Blast Injuries/prevention & control , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Eye Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Eye Injuries/epidemiology , Eye Injuries/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice/ethnology , Humans , International Cooperation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , United States/ethnology
2.
Mil Med ; 183(9-10): e644-e648, 2018 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29447407

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) has been gaining use to bridge the recovery from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) refractory to conventional treatment. However, these interventions are often limited to higher echelons of military care. We present a case of lung salvage from severe ARDS in an Afghani soldier with VV-ECMO at a Role-2 (R2) facility in an austere military environment in Afghanistan. CASE: A 25-year-old Afghani soldier presented to an R2 facility with blast lung injury and multiple penetrating injuries following an explosion. The patient underwent immediate damage control laparotomy. The abdomen was left open for subsequent washouts and ongoing resuscitation. Due to his ineligibility for evacuation and worsening ARDS, despite 5 d of conventional ventilation strategies, he was started on VV-ECMO. The patient had immediate improvements in oxygenation, which continued for 10 d. Moreover, he underwent three transportations to the operating room without accidental decannulation or disruption of the VV-ECMO device. Despite significant improvements, the patient expired on postoperative day 15, due to an overwhelming intra-abdominal sepsis. CONCLUSION: As future advancements are sought, VV-ECMO may become a consideration for casualties with severe ARDS at the point of injury and at lower echelons of military care.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Lung Injury/therapy , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Afghanistan/ethnology , Blast Injuries/epidemiology , Blast Injuries/ethnology , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/trends , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Lung Injury/epidemiology , Lung Injury/ethnology , Male
4.
5.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 85(1): 19-28, 2004 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14970963

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in prosthetic provision, use, and effectiveness among unilateral lower-extremity amputees from 3 ethnic groups in Bosnia and Herzegovina. DESIGN: Case series with a consecutive sample of patients seen in field clinics. SETTING: Multiple field clinics in Bosnia and Herzegovina from October 1998 to May 2002. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 671 patients were examined, and information about their prosthetic history was recorded from observation or verbal responses. The majority of the amputations resulted from injuries inflicted by landmines. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported walking distance per day, prosthesis functionality (functional or nonfunctional as assessed by a physician and a prothetist), prosthesis status (broken or nonbroken as assessed by a physician and a prothetist), and employment status. RESULTS: Ethnic groups differed significantly in types of prostheses provided, functional status of the prostheses, and use of the prostheses for community ambulation. CONCLUSION: Prosthetic devices and delivery of rehabilitation services for unilateral lower-extremity amputees differed between ethnic groups. Despite these differences, functional prosthetic devices increased mobility. Persons in all 3 ethnic groups with functional prostheses were more mobile than persons with nonfunctional prostheses. The employment rate was higher for people with functional prostheses.


Subject(s)
Amputees/rehabilitation , Artificial Limbs , Blast Injuries/ethnology , Blast Injuries/rehabilitation , Adult , Amputees/statistics & numerical data , Artificial Limbs/statistics & numerical data , Bosnia and Herzegovina , Employment , Ethnicity , Explosions , Female , Humans , Male , Prosthesis Fitting , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...