Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.267
Filter
2.
J Clin Apher ; 39(3): e22119, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708577

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) either as stand-alone or adjunctive treatment in kidney transplantation has increased over the years to become a leading indication. This study shows recent trends in indications for TA related to kidney transplantation, adverse events, and patient outcome in this cohort. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort review of adults who received TA for kidney transplant-related indications from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2022, at the University of Virginia Medical Centre, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Data extracted include basic demographics, indication for apheresis, number of procedures, procedure characteristics, procedure-related adverse events (complications), and serum ionized calcium and serum creatinine. Data were analyzed using statistical package for social sciences (SPSS 2022 IBM Inc). RESULTS: Data from a total of 131 patients who received 860 TA procedures were analyzed. Indications for TA were antibody-mediated rejection (65.5%), recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (15%), thrombotic microangiopathy (5%), desensitization for ABO incompatibility (4.5%) and for HLA-incompatibility (4.5%), and recurrent IgA nephropathy (1%). Some adverse events were encountered in 16.7% of the procedures and include hypocalcemia (7%), vascular access malfunction (0.7%), hypotension (1.2%), arrhythmia (0.6%), and depletion coagulopathy (0.6%). The overall case mortality rate was 8.4% over the 6-year period. There was one death recorded on machine during TA resulting in a procedure-mortality rate of 0.12%. CONCLUSION: Antibody-mediated rejection was the most common indication for TA related to kidney transplantation. Adverse events were minor and patient survival over the time was within usual limits.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Blood Component Removal/methods , Adult , Middle Aged , Female , Male , Graft Rejection
3.
CNS Neurosci Ther ; 30(5): e14780, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38790106

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Plasma exchange (PE) and immunoadsorption (IA) are recognized as effective ways to treat attacks in AQP4 antibody-positive NMOSD, but high-quality evidence was lacking. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PE/IA plus intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) in NMOSD attacks using propensity scores to match IVMP as control. METHODS: Patients were from a prospective observational cohort study. Stratification and interval propensity score matching (PSM) were used to reduce selection bias by matching baseline characteristics (gender, age, time to IVMP, EDSS at attack) between PE/IA + IVMP and IVMP group (in a ratio of 1:2). The primary endpoint of efficacy was EDSS change at 6 months. Adverse events and changes in laboratory tests were recorded. RESULTS: Four hundred and eleven attacks of 336 patients were screened for PSM, and 90 attacks (30 PE/IA + IVMP and 60 IVMP) were included in the analysis. There were significant differences in EDSS [6.25 vs. 6.75; IQR (4.50-8.38 vs. 5.00-8.00), p = 0.671] and visual acuity [median logMAR = 0.35 vs. 1.00; IQR (0.30-0.84 vs. 0.95-1.96), p = 0.002] change between two groups at 6 months. PE/IA + IVMP treatment demonstrated predictive capacity for good recovery as indicated by an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.726. Fibrinogen reduction was found during PE/IA + IVMP treatment [n = 15 (50.00%)], but no severe adverse events led to apheresis treatment discontinuation. DISCUSSION: After PSM analysis, IVMP+PE/IA in acute attack of NMOSD achieved better and continuous improvement in neurological function within 6 months compared with IVMP alone. PE/IA treatment showed a good safety profile.


Subject(s)
Aquaporin 4 , Blood Component Removal , Neuromyelitis Optica , Propensity Score , Humans , Female , Male , Neuromyelitis Optica/therapy , Neuromyelitis Optica/immunology , Middle Aged , Adult , Aquaporin 4/immunology , Cohort Studies , Blood Component Removal/methods , Blood Component Removal/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Plasma Exchange/methods , Plasma Exchange/adverse effects , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Methylprednisolone/administration & dosage , Autoantibodies/blood , Prospective Studies
4.
J Clin Apher ; 39(3): e22127, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38803152

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increasing indications for cellular therapy collections have stressed our healthcare system, with autologous collections having a longer than desired wait time until apheresis collection. This quality improvement initiative was undertaken to accommodate more patients within existing resources. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with multiple myeloma who underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection from October 2022 to April 2023 were included. Demographic, mobilization, laboratory, and apheresis data were retrospectively collected from the medical record. RESULTS: This cohort included 120 patients (49.2% male), with a median age of 60 years. All received G-CSF and 95% received pre-emptive Plerixafor approximately 18 hours pre-collection. Most (79%) had collection goals of at least 8 × 106/kg CD34 cells, with 63% over 70 years old having this high collection goal (despite 20 years of institutional data showing <1% over 70 years old have a second transplant). With collection efficiencies of 55.9%, 44% of patients achieved their collection goal in a single day apheresis collection. A platelet count <150 × 103/µL on the day of collection was a predictor for poor mobilization; among 27 patients with a low baseline platelet count, 17 did not achieve the collection goal and 2 failed to collect a transplantable dose. CONCLUSIONS: With minor collection goal adjustments, 15% of all collection appointments could have been avoided over this 6-month period. Other strategies to accommodate more patients include mobilization modifications (Plerixafor timing or substituting a longer acting drug), utilizing platelet counts to predict mobilization, and modifying apheresis collection volumes or schedule templates.


Subject(s)
Benzylamines , Cyclams , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization , Multiple Myeloma , Transplantation, Autologous , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Cyclams/pharmacology , Cyclams/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/methods , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Blood Component Removal/methods , Heterocyclic Compounds/administration & dosage , Heterocyclic Compounds/therapeutic use , Adult , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Platelet Count
5.
Transfusion ; 64(5): 866-870, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38606842

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Standard flow cytometry protocols for CD34+ cell enumeration designed for fresh samples are not appropriate for cryopreserved products. Special protocols have been developed to remove the cryoprotectant by quickly washing a freshly thawed sample. Exposing cells to a large volume of hypotonic solution and subsequent washing process was hypothesized to cause lab-induced cell death. Moreover, standard gating strategies must be altered to avoid reporting falsely high viabilities. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We developed a novel method whereby thawed samples were diluted step-wise to 1:2 by 3 additions of 1/3 sample volume using 1% Human Albumin in Dextran 40 (10% Low Molecular Weight Dextran in 0.9% NaCl) separated by 5 min between each addition. An additional 1:10 dilution was required to obtain a desired cell concentration for flow cytometry testing resulting in a 1:20 dilution. RESULTS: Twenty samples were tested simultaneously in a method comparison; the new method demonstrated significant increases in mean cell viabilities for white blood cells, hematopoietic progenitor cells, and T cells as well as reduced standard deviations for each parameter. DISCUSSION: Slow, step-wise dilutions of freshly thawed samples of cryopreserved apheresis products to 1:20 yielded higher and more precise viability measurements compared to quickly washing samples to remove DMSO.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , Cell Survival , Cryopreservation , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Cryopreservation/methods , Flow Cytometry/methods , Blood Component Removal/methods , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/cytology , Blood Preservation/methods , Cryoprotective Agents/pharmacology , Antigens, CD34/analysis
6.
J Clin Apher ; 39(3): e22118, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38682445

ABSTRACT

The hypercoagulable state associated with sickle cell disease (SCD) can be challenging for apheresis procedures. Among 62 single-needle red cell exchanges (SN-RCEs) performed over a 15-month period, 4 patients experienced 6 hemolytic events with a discolored plasma layer, elevated plasma/RBC interface in the centrifuge, and accompanying alarms of "Cells were detected in plasma line from centrifuge" or "AIM system detected RBC at top of connector." The hemolysis originated from the apheresis instrument because samples from the apheresis belt but not the patients' peripheral blood were positive for hemolysis. Further analysis showed the alarms occurred more often in SN-RCEs (20.4%) than double-needle RCEs (2.7%), and the hemolysis was probably secondary to clumping. To optimize SN-RCE, we increased the anticoagulant dosage by changing Inlet/AC ratio from 13 to 8 and lowered the inlet rate to the level comparable to double-needle RCE. The adjustments were well-tolerated with no more hemolysis.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , Blood Component Removal , Erythrocyte Transfusion , Hemolysis , Humans , Anemia, Sickle Cell/therapy , Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Erythrocyte Transfusion/methods , Blood Component Removal/methods , Needles , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Erythrocytes/cytology , Adult , Male , Female
7.
Atherosclerosis ; 392: 117525, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38598969

ABSTRACT

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia is a life-threatening genetic condition, which causes extremely elevated LDL-C levels and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease very early in life. It is vital to start effective lipid-lowering treatment from diagnosis onwards. Even with dietary and current multimodal pharmaceutical lipid-lowering therapies, LDL-C treatment goals cannot be achieved in many children. Lipoprotein apheresis is an extracorporeal lipid-lowering treatment, which is used for decades, lowering serum LDL-C levels by more than 70% directly after the treatment. Data on the use of lipoprotein apheresis in children with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia mainly consists of case-reports and case-series, precluding strong evidence-based guidelines. We present a consensus statement on lipoprotein apheresis in children based on the current available evidence and opinions from experts in lipoprotein apheresis from over the world. It comprises practical statements regarding the indication, methods, treatment goals and follow-up of lipoprotein apheresis in children with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia and on the role of lipoprotein(a) and liver transplantation.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , Consensus , Homozygote , Humans , Blood Component Removal/methods , Child , Treatment Outcome , Lipoprotein(a)/blood , Cholesterol, LDL/blood , Adolescent , Liver Transplantation , Biomarkers/blood , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type I/diagnosis , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type I/therapy , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type I/blood , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type I/genetics , Phenotype , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/therapy , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/blood , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/genetics , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/diagnosis , Child, Preschool , Lipoproteins/blood , Genetic Predisposition to Disease
8.
Cells ; 13(7)2024 Mar 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38607025

ABSTRACT

Achieving successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) relies on two fundamental pillars: effective mobilization and efficient collection through apheresis to attain the optimal graft dose. These cornerstones pave the way for enhanced patient outcomes. The primary challenges encountered by the clinical unit and collection facility within a transplant program encompass augmenting mobilization efficiency to optimize the harvest of target cell populations, implementing robust monitoring and predictive strategies for mobilization, streamlining the apheresis procedure to minimize collection duration while ensuring adequate yield, prioritizing patient comfort by reducing the overall collection time, guaranteeing the quality and purity of stem cell products to optimize graft function and transplant success, and facilitating seamless coordination between diverse entities involved in the HSCT process. In this review, we aim to address key questions and provide insights into the critical aspects of mobilizing and collecting hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation purposes.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Adult , Humans , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/methods , Transplantation, Homologous , Blood Component Removal/methods , Hematopoietic Stem Cells
9.
J Clin Apher ; 39(3): e22109, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38634419

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic affected healthcare delivery across all specialties including apheresis. To describe the changes in apheresis service practices that occurred during the pandemic, the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Apheresis Medicine Attending Physician Subcommittee conducted a survey study. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A 32-question survey was designed and distributed to 400 ASFA physician members on September 7, 2022. Attending physicians responded to questions about whether and how apheresis service practices changed during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with the time period prior to the pandemic in terms of: (1) procedure types and volumes, (2) patient consultation workflow, and (3) the use of telemedicine. Descriptive analyses were reported as number and frequency of responses. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 13.8% (55/400). Of these respondents, 96.4% (53/55) were attending physicians. The majority of respondents (42/53, 79.2%) indicated that the types of procedures performed during COVID-19 compared to pre-pandemic did not change. Most frequently for apheresis procedure volume, respondents reported: no change in their monthly inpatient volume (21/47, 44.7%) and a decrease in their monthly outpatient volume (28/46, 60.9%). Prior to COVID-19, 75.0% (30/40) of respondents performed consultations at bedside for inpatients and 67.4% (29/43) performed consultations at bedside for outpatients. Bedside consultations decreased in both settings during the pandemic but were still most frequently performed by attending physicians. At the same time, the use of telemedicine increased for 15.4% of survey respondents during COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Some, but not all, respondents observed or made changes to their apheresis service during the COVID-19 pandemic. A subset of changes, such as increased utilization of telemedicine, may persist.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , COVID-19 , Physicians , Humans , Pandemics , Blood Component Removal/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
J Clin Apher ; 39(3): e22111, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38634439

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to assess the use of midline catheters as venous access for apheresis procedures in pediatric patients. A retrospective analysis of medical records was conducted from September 2019 to June 2022 to evaluate the safety and efficacy of midline catheters for therapeutic pediatric apheresis. During the study period, a total of 121 procedures were inserted in 22 unique patients. The age of the subjects ranged from 2.7 to 21 years. The blood flow rates achieved with midline catheters met or exceeded the recommended rates for apheresis in children (40 mL/min), by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p < 0.0001). There was one episode of catheter-related thrombosis, but no cases of bloodstream infection or catheter dislodgement were reported. In conclusion, this study supports the use of midline catheters as a safe and effective alternative for venous access during therapeutic and donor apheresis procedures in pediatric patients.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Catheterization, Peripheral , Central Venous Catheters , Thrombosis , Humans , Child , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Retrospective Studies , Catheters , Blood Component Removal/methods , Catheterization, Peripheral/methods
11.
Pediatr Transplant ; 28(3): e14751, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38659194

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The published experience concerning autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection in children is very limited. METHODS: The data of pediatric patients who underwent autologous stem cell mobilization and apheresis between January 2011 and April 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: We studied retrospectively 64 mobilization and apheresis procedures in 48 pediatric patients (34 males, 14 females), mean age of 7.31 ± 5.38 (range, 1.5-19.7) years, the underlying disease was mostly neuroblastoma (NBL). The body weight of 21 patients (43.75%) was 15 kg or less. The targeted autologous peripheral stem cell apheresis (APSCA) was successfully achieved in 98% of patients. Neuroblastoma patients were younger than the rest of the patients and underwent apheresis after receiving fewer chemotherapy cycles than others and all of them mobilized within the first session successfully. Plerixafor was added to mobilization in nine heavily pretreated patients (18.7%), median two doses (range, 1-4 doses). 11 patients (22.9%) underwent radiotherapy (RT) before mobilization with doses of median 24 Gy (range, 10.8-54.0 Gy). Patients with RT were older at the time of apheresis and had received more chemotherapy courses than patients without RT. As a result, patients with a history of RT had significantly lower peripheral CD34+ cells and CD34+ yields than those without RT. In 17 patients (35.4%), 22 different complications were noted. The most common complications were catheter-related infections (n:10, 20.8%), followed by catheter-related thrombosis in eight patients (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had far less therapy before apheresis were more likely to mobilize successfully. Our study provides a detailed practice approach including complications during APSCA aiming to increase the success rates of apheresis in transplantation centers.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization , Neoplasms , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Transplantation, Autologous , Humans , Female , Male , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/methods , Child , Retrospective Studies , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Infant , Blood Component Removal/methods , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Young Adult , Peripheral Blood Stem Cells
12.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(5)2024 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38474257

ABSTRACT

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an apheresis procedure that is conventionally used as a first-line treatment for cutaneous and leukemic subtypes of T-cell lymphoma, such as Sezary's syndrome and mycosis fungoides. Over the past three decades, its immunotherapeutic properties have been tested on a variety of autoimmune conditions, including many dermatologic diseases. There is ample evidence of ECP's ability to modify leukocytes and alter cytokine production for certain dermatologic diseases that have been refractory to first-line treatments, such as atopic dermatitis. However, the evidence on the efficacy of ECP for the treatment of these dermatologic diseases is unclear and/or lacks sufficient evidence. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature on the utilization and clinical efficacy of ECP in the treatment of several [autoimmune] dermatologic diseases and discuss its applications, guidelines, recommendations, and future implementation for dermatologic diseases.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , Mycosis Fungoides , Photopheresis , Sezary Syndrome , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Photopheresis/methods , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Mycosis Fungoides/pathology , Blood Component Removal/methods , Sezary Syndrome/therapy
13.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 2762, 2024 02 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38307884

ABSTRACT

Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is a therapeutic option for hyperlipoproteinemia(a) (hyper-Lp(a)) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). LA improves blood rheology, reduces oxidative stress parameters and improves endothelial function. The underlying molecular mechanisms of LA beneficial effects are unknown, but it has been suggested that LA exhibits multiple activities beyond simply removing lipoproteins. We hypothesized that LA removes not only lipoproteins, but also extracellular vesicles (EVs). To test this hypothesis, we performed a prospective study in 22 patients undergoing LA for hyper-Lp(a) and ASCVD. Different EVs subtypes were measured before and directly after LA, and after 7 days. We used calibrated flow cytometry to detect total particle concentration (diameter > ~ 100 nm), total lipoproteins concentration (diameter > 200 nm, RI > 1.51), total EV concentration (diameter > 200 nm, RI < 1.41), concentrations of EVs derived from erythrocytes (CD235a+; diameter > 200 nm, RI < 1.41), leukocytes (CD45+; diameter > 200 nm, RI < 1.41) and platelets (CD61+, PEVs; diameter > 200 nm, RI < 1.41). LA reduced the concentrations of all investigated EVs subtypes and lipoproteins. Lp(a) concentration was lowered by 64.5% [(58% - 71%); p < 0.001]. Plasma concentrations of EVs > 200 nm in diameter derived from platelets (CD61 +), leukocytes (CD45+) and erythrocytes (CD235a+) decreased after single LA procedure by 42.7% [(12.8-54.7); p = 0.005], 42.6% [(29.7-54.1); p = 0.030] and 26.7% [(1.0-62.7); p = 0.018], respectively, compared to baseline. All EV subtypes returned to the baseline concentrations in blood plasma after 7 days. To conclude, LA removes not only Lp(a), but also cell-derived EVs, which may contribute to LA beneficial effects.


Subject(s)
Atherosclerosis , Blood Component Removal , Extracellular Vesicles , Hyperlipoproteinemias , Humans , Prospective Studies , Lipoprotein(a) , Blood Component Removal/methods , Atherosclerosis/therapy
14.
Vox Sang ; 119(5): 476-482, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38357715

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Writing Committee of American Society for Apheresis released the ninth edition of guidelines for therapeutic apheresis in 2023. Categories have been a part of the guidelines since the first edition, and the grading system was introduced in the fifth edition, with updates in every new edition. In this study, we investigated the category and grade change trends through the latest five editions, focusing on therapeutic plasma exchange, to suggest future directions as part of evidence-based medicine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Categories and grades for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) were collected and analysed from the fifth through ninth editions. We aligned classification changes to the ninth edition's clinical context and compared its categories and grades with those introduced in the guideline. RESULTS: Among 166 total indications in the ninth edition, 118 included TPE procedure, either as a sole treatment or as one of the therapeutic apheresis techniques. The total number of indications changed, but Category III remained predominant throughout the editions. Similarly, Grade 2C consistently emerged as the most prevalent grade. Notably, 24 cases had grade changes. Of the 16 cases with evidence quality changes, the quality weakened in six and improved in 10. Evidence levels were not improved throughout the study period for 102 clinical conditions. CONCLUSION: To address gaps in evidence quality, international collaboration is imperative to establish comprehensive large-scale studies or randomized controlled trials. This will refine the use of therapeutic apheresis, including TPE, to foster evidence-based advancements in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , Evidence-Based Medicine , Plasma Exchange , Humans , Plasma Exchange/methods , Blood Component Removal/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Societies, Medical , United States , Female , Male
15.
Transfusion ; 64(4): 674-684, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38419458

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In patients with relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r B-ALL/B-NHL) with low CD3+ cells in the peripheral blood (PB), sufficient CD3+ cell yield in a single day may not be obtained with normal-volume leukapheresis (NVL). Large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) refers to the processing of more than three times the total blood volume (TBV) in a single session for PB apheresis; however, the efficiency and safety of LVL for manufacturing of tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the tolerability of LVL. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on LVL (≥3-fold TBV) and NVL (<3-fold TBV) performed for patients with r/r B-ALL/B-NHL in our institution during November 2019 and September 2023. All procedures were performed using a continuous mononuclear cell collection (cMNC) protocol with the Spectra Optia. RESULTS: Although pre-apheresis CD3+ cells in the PB were significantly lower in LVL procedures (900 vs. 348/µL, p < .01), all patients could obtain sufficient CD3+ cell yield in a single day with a comparably successful rate of final products (including out-of-specification) between the two groups (97.2% vs. 100.0%, p = 1.00). The incidence and severity of citrate toxicity (no patients with grade ≥ 3) during procedures was not significantly different between the two groups (22.2% vs. 26.1%, p = .43) and no patient discontinued leukapheresis due to any complications. CONCLUSION: LVL procedures using Spectra Optia cMNC protocol was well tolerated and did not affect the manufacturing of tisa-cel.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , Leukapheresis , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell , Humans , Leukapheresis/methods , Retrospective Studies , Antigens, CD34 , Blood Component Removal/methods
16.
Transfusion ; 64(2): 367-379, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38174435

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Platelet concentrates (PCs) could be prepared using either whole-blood processes or apheresis instruments. During collection, processing and storage, some biochemical and functional changes occur, which may result in quality reduction. Quality evaluation of PCs may be helpful for the precise control of platelet (PLT) inventory to reduce the risk of refractoriness and adverse effects caused by platelet transfusion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study was aimed to evaluate the quality of PCs which were produced by five processes: apheresis (AP) procedures (using three different cell separators: Amicus, Trima Accel and MCS+ instruments), platelet rich plasma (PRP), and buffy coat (BC). A total of 100 PCs (20 of each group) were assessed in respect of routine quality control, morphology, size distribution, destroyed and activated platelets, and production of platelet-derived microparticles (PMPs). RESULTS: All PCs have satisfied the recommended quality of volume, platelet count, residual WBC count, residual RBC count, pH, and sterility according to the Chinese Technical Manual. There was no difference among the 5 groups in morphology and size of PLT and PMPs. Dynamic light scattering test showed that apheresis PCs showed peaks around 10-20 nm, but not whole blood-derived PCs. PCs prepared by Amicus had the relatively high percentage of destroyed platelet, activated platelets and PMPs than other groups. DISCUSSION: The data suggested high heterogeneity of PMPs, destroyed and activated platelets in PCs produced by different processes, which might be helpful to manage the platelet inventory for targeted use.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , Cell-Derived Microparticles , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Humans , Blood Component Removal/methods , Blood Platelets , Platelet Count , Blood Preservation/methods
17.
Ther Apher Dial ; 28(3): 442-452, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38168492

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A remission induction therapy of granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) was given to patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, establishing an appropriate treatment strategy for GMA in patients with CD remains unclear. METHODS: This study evaluated the clinical efficacy and subsequent clinical progression after GMA in patients with CD who underwent GMA in seven independent institutions in Japan from 2010 to 2023. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled. The overall remission and response rates were 25.0% and 68.8%, respectively. All patients responding to GMA received biologics that were continuously used and 36.4% of patients remained on the same biologics 52 weeks after GMA. Notably, all patients who continued the same biologics had previously experienced a loss of response to biologics. CONCLUSION: GMA may exhibit effectiveness even in cases with refractory CD. Moreover, it represents a potential novel therapeutic option for refractory CD with loss of response to biologics.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , Crohn Disease , Granulocytes , Monocytes , Humans , Crohn Disease/therapy , Male , Female , Pilot Projects , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Blood Component Removal/methods , Japan , Treatment Outcome , Middle Aged , Remission Induction/methods , Adsorption , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Young Adult
18.
Ther Apher Dial ; 28(3): 453-459, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38173128

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A novel LDL (low-density lipoprotein) apheresis therapeutic option, Rheocarna, has garnered attention as an alternative therapy for chronic limb-threating ischemia (CLTI). Bradykinin-mediated vasodilation is involved in the effects of LDL apheresis and a decrease in blood pressure (BP), but the changes in bradykinin concentration during Rheocarna therapy are unknown. METHODS: The study involved patients with CLTI treated with Rheocarna at our hospital, from April 2022 to August 2023. RESULTS: After Rheocarna therapy, skin ulcers improved in 80% of the patients. Circuit coagulation was observed in two patients with high fibrinogen levels. A decrease in BP was observed at approximately the same time when the bradykinin concentration peaked. The peak bradykinin concentration in a patient undergoing hemodialysis at the same time was considerably lower than that in the other patients. CONCLUSION: This is the first report on the changes in bradykinin concentration under Rheocarna therapy.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure , Bradykinin , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Middle Aged , Blood Component Removal/methods , Ischemia , Lipoproteins, LDL/blood
19.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 63(1): 103853, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38049358

ABSTRACT

Apheresis is a modern medical approach in which plasma or cellular components are separated from the whole blood. Apheresis can be either diagnostic or therapeutic. Diagnostic apheresis is typically applied in hematology and cancer research. Therapeutic Apheresis (TA) includes a broad spectrum of extracorporeal treatments applied in various medical specialties, including Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Considering the complexity of the pathophysiologic characteristics of various clinical entities and in particular sepsis, apheresis methods are becoming increasingly applicable. Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE) is the most common used method in ICU. It is considered as first line therapy for Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) and Guillain Barre Syndrome, while the current data for sepsis are scarce. Over the last decades, technologic evolution has led to increasing application of new and more selective methods based on adsorptive techniques. In this review we will describe the current data of characteristics of different techniques, safety and clinical impact of apheresis methods used in ICUs.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic , Sepsis , Humans , Blood Component Removal/methods , Plasma Exchange/methods , Plasmapheresis , Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic/therapy , Intensive Care Units , Sepsis/therapy
20.
Transfus Apher Sci ; 63(1): 103863, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38065773

ABSTRACT

Therapeutic apheresis refers to a group of extracorporeal blood processing procedures used in the treatment of a variety of systemic diseases. These complex procedures are burdened by adverse reactions related to both procedures and underlying medical conditions. Given the importance of centralizing the collection and the analysis of information on therapeutic apheresis, the Italian National Blood Center (NBC), at the request of the Italian Scientific Society of Hemapheresis and Cell Manipulation (SIdEM), implemented the Italian Registry of Therapeutic Apheresis (IRTA) including it in the Information System of Transfusion Services (SISTRA), coordinated by the NBC. In 2022, a total of 34,702 therapeutic apheresis procedures was carried out in 8,781 patients, including paediatric patients, with an average of 3.9 procedures per patient. The 2022 IRTA data indicate that the patient with hematological and/or neurological disorders mainly turns to the apheresis centers. These results confirm the IRTA data from years 2020 and 2021. In the hematological field, the apheresis centers supply hematopoietic stem cells collection for autologous transplantation as well as mononuclear cell collection for extracorporeal photopheresis. With regard to the neurological field, myasthenia, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and Guillain-Barré syndrome along with other neurological pathologies related to immune disorders are the most treated. In conclusion, this manuscript presents 2022 activity data of IRTA providing institutions and scientific societies with a wide range of information including type and number of therapeutic procedures, adverse events and patients' outcome.


Subject(s)
Blood Component Removal , Photopheresis , Humans , Child , Blood Component Removal/methods , Registries , Transplantation, Autologous , Italy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...