Blood types and ABO incompatibility.

Using the Punnett square and having an understanding of the relationship between genes and blood types will assist you in explaining blood type inheritance to parents and answering their many questions. Using this tool, nurses can show parents what is happening during the division of genes and how blood type genes are expressed.

Understanding blood groups and transfusion in nursing practice.

A donation of whole blood can be processed into red cells, platelets, fresh frozen plasma and cryoprecipitate. This processing permits individual blood components to be given to several different patients and transfusion of appropriate blood components according to the specific needs of the individual. Although blood transfusion may be perceived as a common practice, it is not without risk and all staff should be aware of their roles and responsibilities within this process. To help reduce the risks associated with transfusion, staff must be aware of local policies and procedures, receive the relevant transfusion training, and be assessed as competent.

Transfusing safely: a 2006 guide for nurses.

Transfusion is a 'vein-to-vein' process. The blood supply in Australia is extremely safe in terms of viral risk, although a 'zero risk' blood transfusion is never possible. Safe transfusion practice continues to rely on highly-trained and experienced staff undertaking procedures correctly, in robust hospital systems within a safety and quality framework that includes an adverse event reporting system. Such a reporting system should work to enhance any hospital system where weaknesses or deficiencies are found. Further information on national guidelines and other aspects of transfusion in Australia can be found at: www.anzsbt.org.au/publications and www.transfusion.com.au. A transfusion administration checklist for nurses can be downloaded from: http://www.transfusion.com.au/Resourc eLibrary/resource_safety_2 .asp

Factors associated with nurses' poor knowledge and practice of transfusion safety procedures in Aquitaine, France.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) describe knowledge, attitudes, and reported practice of blood transfusion of nurses in Aquitaine's hospitals; (2) measure the potential threat for patient safety of poor transfusion-related knowledge and practice; and (3) identify factors associated with poor knowledge and practice. DESIGN: Survey conducted in 14 hospitals in Aquitaine (one university and 13 general hospitals). SETTING: Hospitalized care. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of nurses. MATERIALS: Data were collected anonymously by investigators through structured individual interviews. The questionnaire contained mainly knowledge and practice questions about blood transfusion regulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hazardous knowledge and practice scores have been constructed, reflecting the levels of potential danger in the answers to the questionnaire. Factors associated with these scores have been studied using a random-effect linear regression. RESULTS: In our sample of 1090 nurses, poor knowledge and practice concerned mainly (1) the bedside blood compatibility test [proportion of responses (PR) with potential life threat between 12.7 and 35.5%]; (2) pre-transfusion compatibility check when receiving blood units (PR = 34.5%); (3) delay between screening of red cell antibodies and transfusion (PR = 20.5%); (4) delay in preservation of blood unit in the ward (PR = 33.4%); and (5) recognition of abnormal reactions after transfusion (PR = 47.1%). Frequency of transfusion and training were the factors most strongly associated with hazardous knowledge and practice scores. CONCLUSION: Low training and transfusion activity were key determinants of poor transfusion-related knowledge and practice.

A novel system for providing compatible blood to patients during surgery: "self-service" electronic blood banking by nursing staff.

BACKGROUND: A good blood bank must be able to provide compatible blood units promptly to operating room patients with minimal wastage. A "self-service" by nursing staff blood banking system that is safe, efficient, and well-accepted has been developed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Specific blood units are no longer assigned to surgical patients who have a negative pretransfusion antibody screen, irrespective of the type of surgery. A computer-generated list of the serial numbers of all group-identical blood units currently in the blood bank inventory is provided for each patient. The units themselves are not labeled with a patient's name. The group O list will be provided for group O patients, the group A list for group A patients, and so forth. Should the patient require transfusion during surgery, the operating room nurses go to the refrigerator, remove any group-identical unit, and check the serial number of the unit against the serial numbers on the patient's list. If the serial number is on that list, the blood bank will accept responsibility for compatibility. The system was implemented in 1995. RESULTS: Since implementation, a total of 2154 patients have undergone operations at this hospital. Thirty-two patients received more than 10 units of red cells each. There were no transfusion errors. The crossmatch-to-transfusion ratio was reduced from 1.67 to 1.12. Turnaround time for supplying additional or urgent units to patients in operating room was shortened from 33 to 2.5 minutes. There was no incidence of a blood unit's serial number not being on the list. Work by nurses and technical staff was reduced by nearly 50 percent. CONCLUSION: The "self-service" (by nursing staff) blood banking system described is safe and efficient. It saves staff time and can be easily set up.