Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 152
Filter
1.
N Engl J Med ; 390(4): 338-345, 2024 Jan 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265645

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hospitals can leverage their position between the ultimate buyers and sellers of drugs to retain a substantial share of insurer pharmaceutical expenditures. METHODS: In this study, we used 2020-2021 national Blue Cross Blue Shield claims data regarding patients in the United States who had drug-infusion visits for oncologic conditions, inflammatory conditions, or blood-cell deficiency disorders. Markups of the reimbursement prices were measured in terms of amounts paid by Blue Cross Blue Shield plans to hospitals and physician practices relative to the amounts paid by these providers to drug manufacturers. Acquisition-price reductions in hospital payments to drug manufacturers were measured in terms of discounts under the federal 340B Drug Pricing Program. We estimated the percentage of Blue Cross Blue Shield drug spending that was received by drug manufacturers and the percentage retained by provider organizations. RESULTS: The study included 404,443 patients in the United States who had 4,727,189 drug-infusion visits. The median price markup (defined as the ratio of the reimbursement price to the acquisition price) for hospitals eligible for 340B discounts was 3.08 (interquartile range, 1.87 to 6.38). After adjustment for drug, patient, and geographic factors, price markups at hospitals eligible for 340B discounts were 6.59 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.02 to 7.16) as high as those in independent physician practices, and price markups at noneligible hospitals were 4.34 times (95% CI, 3.77 to 4.90) as high as those in physician practices. Hospitals eligible for 340B discounts retained 64.3% of insurer drug expenditures, whereas hospitals not eligible for 340B discounts retained 44.8% and independent physician practices retained 19.1%. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that hospitals imposed large price markups and retained a substantial share of total insurer spending on physician-administered drugs for patients with private insurance. The effects were especially large for hospitals eligible for discounts under the federal 340B Drug Pricing Program on acquisition costs paid to manufacturers. (Funded by Arnold Ventures and the National Institute for Health Care Management.).


Subject(s)
Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans , Fees, Pharmaceutical , Hospital Charges , Insurance, Health , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Humans , Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/economics , Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel , Hospitals , Insurance Carriers , Physicians/economics , Insurance, Health/economics , Pharmaceutical Preparations/administration & dosage , Pharmaceutical Preparations/economics , Private Sector , Insurance Claim Review/economics , Insurance Claim Review/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Infusions, Parenteral/economics , Infusions, Parenteral/statistics & numerical data , Economics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Professional Practice/economics , Professional Practice/statistics & numerical data
2.
Am J Cardiol ; 155: 9-15, 2021 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34325106

ABSTRACT

Potent antithrombotic agents are routinely prescribed after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to reduce ischemic complications. However, in patients who are at an increased bleeding risk, this may pose significant risks. We sought to evaluate the association between a history of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and outcomes after PCI. We linked clinical registry data from PCIs performed at 48 Michigan hospitals between 1/2013 and 3/2018 to Medicare claims. We used 1:5 propensity score matching to adjust for patient characteristics. In-hospital outcomes included bleeding, transfusion, stroke or death. Post-discharge outcomes included 90-day all-cause readmission and long-term mortality. Of 30,206 patients, 1.1% had a history of GIB. Patients with a history of GIB were more likely to be older, female, and have more cardiovascular comorbidities. After matching, those with a history of GIB (n = 312) had increased post-procedural transfusions (15.7% vs 8.4%; p < 0.001), bleeding (11.9% vs 5.2%; p < 0.001), and major bleeding (2.8% vs 0.6%; p = 0.004). Ninety-day readmission rates were similar among those with and without a history of GIB (34.3% vs 31.3%; p = 0.318). There was no significant difference in post-discharge survival (1 year: 78% vs 80%; p = 0.217; 5 years: 54% vs 51%; p = 0.189). In conclusion, after adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients with a history of GIB had increased risk of post-PCI in-hospital bleeding complications. However, a history of GIB was not significantly associated with 90-day readmission or long-term survival.


Subject(s)
Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/complications , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Registries , Aged , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Michigan/epidemiology , Patient Discharge/trends , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends
3.
Am J Manag Care ; 26(6): e179-e183, 2020 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32549067

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a program that eliminated pharmacy co-pays, the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana (BCBSLA) Zero Dollar Co-pay (ZDC) program, decreased health care spending. Previous studies have found that value-based insurance designs like the ZDC program have little or no impact on total health care spending. ZDC included an expansive set of medications related to 4 chronic diseases rather than a limited set of medications for 1 or 2 chronic diseases. Additionally, ZDC focused on the most at-risk patients. STUDY DESIGN: ZDC began in 2014 and enrolled patients over time based on (1) when a patient answered a call from a nurse care manager and (2) when a patient or their employer changed the benefit structure to meet the program criteria. During 2015 and 2016, 265 patients with at least 1 chronic condition (asthma, diabetes, hypertension, mental illness) enrolled in ZDC. METHODS: Observational study using within-patient variation and variation in patient enrollment month to identify the impact of the ZDC program on health spending measures. We used 100% BCBSLA claims data from January 2015 to June 2018. Monthly level event studies were used to test for differential spending patterns prior to ZDC enrollment. RESULTS: We found that total spending decreased by $205.9 (P = .049) per member per month, or approximately 18%. We saw a decrease in medical spending ($195.0; P = .023) but did not detect a change in pharmacy spending ($7.59; P = .752). We found no evidence of changes in spending patterns prior to ZDC enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: The ZDC program provides evidence that value-based insurance designs that incorporate a comprehensive set of medications and focus on populations with chronic disease can reduce spending.


Subject(s)
Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/organization & administration , Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Deductibles and Coinsurance/economics , Deductibles and Coinsurance/statistics & numerical data , Drug Costs/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization/economics , Value-Based Health Insurance/organization & administration , Value-Based Health Insurance/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chronic Disease/drug therapy , Chronic Disease/economics , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Louisiana , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
4.
J Med Econ ; 23(6): 557-565, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31990232

ABSTRACT

Aims: Chronic diseases impose a substantial healthcare burden. This study sought to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of new disease management (DM) programs, targeting four major chronic disease groups: diabetes, coronary heart disease (CHD)/hypertension (HTN), asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and congestive heart failure (CHF)/chronic kidney disease (CKD).Materials and methods: Between March 1, 2015, and February 28, 2018, members with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana insurance were contacted and enrolled in a DM program if they were aged 18 years through 64 years, eligible for a DM program, and had not been previously enrolled in a DM program. Active enrollees of a DM program ("IN" group) were compared to members who were not yet enrolled ("OUT" group). Average per member per month (PMPM) costs were aggregated annually to document any descriptive trends. Multivariable model estimates were used to compare PMPM costs for all IN subjects and all OUT subjects. Total medical savings were evaluated for the following time intervals: 1-12 months, 13-24 months, and 25-36 months.Results: For all four DM programs, average costs PMPM trended upward over time for the OUT cohort, while they remained relatively stable for the IN cohort. Some evidence also showed that DM programs improved clinical outcomes, such as hemoglobin A1c values. A difference in difference analysis showed PMPM savings for all four programs combined of $31.61, $50.45, and $53.72 after 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Multivariable modeling results showed total savings after 3 years of $14,460,174 for all DM programs combined.Limitations: Although multivariable models adjusted for several clinical, demographic, and economic characteristics; it is possible that some important confounders were missing due to lack of data.Conclusions: DM programs implemented to control diabetes, CHD/HTN, CHF/CKD, and asthma/COPD are cost-effective and show some evidence of improved clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Chronic Disease/therapy , Disease Management , Adolescent , Adult , Asthma/therapy , Cardiovascular Diseases/therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Female , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Louisiana , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Econometric , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Young Adult
5.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 142(4): 434e-442e, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29979366

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Flap-based breast reconstruction demands greater operative labor and offers superior patient-reported outcomes compared with implants. However, use of implants continues to outpace flaps, with some suggesting inadequate remuneration as one barrier. This study aims to characterize market variation in the ratio of implants to flaps and assess correlation with physician payments. METHODS: Using the Blue Health Intelligence database from 2009 to 2013, patients were identified who underwent tissue expander (i.e., implant) or free-flap breast reconstruction. The implant-to-flap ratio and physician payments were assessed using quadratic modeling. Matched bootstrapped samples from the early and late periods generated probability distributions, approximating the odds of surgeons switching reconstructive method. RESULTS: A total of 21,259 episodes of breast reconstruction occurred in 122 U.S. markets. The distribution of implant-to-flap ratio varied by market, ranging from the fifth percentile at 1.63 to the ninety-fifth percentile at 43.7 (median, 6.19). Modeling the implant-to-flap ratio versus implant payment showed a more elastic quadratic equation compared with the function for flap-to-implant ratio versus flap payment. Probability modeling demonstrated that switching the reconstructive method from implants to flaps with a 0.75 probability required a $1610 payment increase, whereas switching from flaps to implants at the same certainty occurred at a loss of $960. CONCLUSIONS: There was a correlation between the ratio of flaps to implants and physician reimbursement by market. Switching from implants to flaps required large surgeon payment increases. Despite a relative value unit schedule over twice as high for flaps, current flap reimbursements do not appear commensurate with physician effort.


Subject(s)
Breast Implants/statistics & numerical data , Free Tissue Flaps/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/statistics & numerical data , Mammaplasty/economics , Adult , Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Mammaplasty/methods , Mammaplasty/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Tissue Expansion Devices/statistics & numerical data , United States
6.
Health Serv Res ; 53(5): 3770-3789, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29952062

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of assignment to a Medicaid-focused versus mixed managed care plan on continuity of Medicaid coverage. DATA SOURCES: 2011-2016 Medicaid claims from a Northeastern state. STUDY DESIGN: Following the exit of a Medicaid managed care insurer, Medicaid administrators prioritized provider networks in reassigning enrollees, but randomly assigned beneficiaries whose providers were equally represented in the two plans. We leveraged the natural experiment created by random plan assignment and conducted an instrumental variable analysis. DATA COLLECTION: We analyzed Medicaid claims for 12,083 beneficiaries who were members of the exiting Blue Cross Blue Shield plan prior to January 1, 2011. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Managed care plan type did not significantly impact continuous enrollment in the Medicaid program. Greater outpatient utilization and the presence of a special need among children were associated with longer enrollment in Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: Managed care plans did not differ in their capacity to keep Medicaid beneficiaries continuously enrolled in coverage, despite differences in plan features.


Subject(s)
Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Managed Care Programs/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , State Health Plans/statistics & numerical data , Humans , United States
7.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 30(1): 35-42, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29289948

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical features and outcomes of patients with anemia undergoing percutaneous peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) in a contemporary registry. METHODS: We evaluated the differences in the clinical features and outcomes of patients with and without anemia undergoing PVI in the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2 VIC) registry. Anemia was defined using World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: Baseline anemia was present in 42.3% of 15,683 patients undergoing PVI. Compared to patients without anemia, those with anemia were older (mean age, 67 years vs 71 years), were more often black (16% vs 29%), and had higher comorbidities. Anemic patients were twice as likely to present with acute limb ischemia (5% vs 11%) and undergo urgent PVI (6% vs 15%) or below-the-knee PVI (18% vs 35%). Many in-hospital adverse events were higher in anemic patients. In a propensity-matched cohort, any adverse outcome (3.4% vs 8.4%; odds ratio [OR], 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.94-3.42) or major cardiovascular event, defined as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or amputation (1.1% vs 3.2%; OR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.83-4.79) was more likely in anemic patients. Of all adverse events, the highest odds were observed for post-PVI transfusions and amputations in anemic patients. Multivariable logistic regression showed that baseline hemoglobin (1 g/dL below the normal value) was associated with greater risk of any adverse event (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.47-1.68). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of anemia was high among PVI patients and was associated with significantly greater likelihood of amputation, any adverse event, and major cardiovascular events. Whether preprocedure correction of anemia has the potential to decrease post-PVI adverse events remains to be studied.


Subject(s)
Anemia , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Aged , Anemia/diagnosis , Anemia/epidemiology , Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Michigan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Peripheral Arterial Disease/epidemiology , Peripheral Arterial Disease/surgery , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Vascular Surgical Procedures/methods , Vascular Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data
8.
Am Heart J ; 195: 99-107, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29224652

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is being increasingly performed nationally at sites without on-site cardiac surgery; however, recent guidelines only provide a Class IIa recommendation for this practice. The state of Michigan has permitted PPCI without on-site surgery under a closely monitored system that mandates auditing of all procedures and quarterly feedback on quality and outcomes. This study sought to compare outcomes of patients undergoing PPCI at centers with and without on-site surgery in the state of Michigan. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent PPCI at 47 hospitals in Michigan from January 2010 to December 2015 were included. From this cohort, 4,091 patients from sites with and without on-site cardiac surgery were propensity matched in a 1:1 fashion to compare baseline characteristics, procedural details, and in-hospital outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 25,886 PPCIs performed at 47 hospitals in Michigan from 2010 to 2015, 21,610 (83.5%) were performed at sites with on-site surgery and 4,276 (16.5%) at sites without on-site surgery. Using propensity score matched cohorts (4,091 patients for each site type), we found no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Overall mortality (5.4% vs 5.8%; P=.442); composite outcome of in-hospital mortality, contrast-induced nephropathy, bleeding, and stroke (13.8% vs 12.8%; P=.152); and individual outcomes within the composite group showed no significant differences. Additionally, there were no clinically meaningful differences in rates of urgent/emergent coronary artery bypass graft or length of stay. Significant differences, however, were found in procedural access site, antiplatelet therapy, contrast volume, and anticoagulant strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Primary PCI performed at centers with and without cardiac surgery have comparable outcomes and complication rates when performed with close monitoring of quality and outcomes.


Subject(s)
Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Risk Assessment , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Female , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Male , Michigan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Propensity Score , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Treatment Outcome
9.
J Health Econ ; 57: 75-88, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29182936

ABSTRACT

In exchange for tax exemptions, Blue Cross and Blue Shield (BCBS) health insurers were expected to provide health insurance to the "bad risks," those for whom coverage was unavailable from other insurers. I present evidence that five years after a BCBS plan converted to for-profit status, the probability of having insurance was 1.4 percentage points higher, a 9% reduction in the uninsured. The increase in coverage does not mask reductions among populations often targeted by public policies. However, there is evidence of increased risk selection which suggests that the bad risks might have been worse off after a conversion.


Subject(s)
Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/economics , For-Profit Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/economics , Medically Uninsured/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/organization & administration , Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Female , For-Profit Insurance Plans/economics , For-Profit Insurance Plans/organization & administration , Humans , Insurance Coverage/economics , Insurance Coverage/organization & administration , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/organization & administration , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Male , United States
10.
J Interv Cardiol ; 30(3): 274-280, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28370487

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after Percutaneous Vascular Intervention (PVI) in contemporary medical practice are largely unknown. METHODS: A total of 13 126 patients undergoing PVI were included in the analysis. CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine from pre-PVI baseline to post-PVI peak Cr of ≥0.5 mg/dL. RESULTS: CIN occurred in 3% (400 patients) of the cohort, and 26 patients (6.5%) required dialysis. Independent predictors of CIN were high and low body weight, diabetes, heart failure, anemia, baseline renal dysfunction, critical limb ischemia, and a higher acuity of the PVI procedure and a contrast dose that was greater than three times the calculated creatinine clearance (CCC) (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.8, P = 0.003). CIN was strongly associated with adverse outcome including in-hospital death (adjusted OR 18.1, CI 10.7-30.6, P < 0.001), myocardial infarction (adjusted OR 16.2, CI 8.9-29.5, P < 0.001), transient ischemic attack/stroke (adjusted OR 5.5, CI 3.2-14.9, P = 0.001), vascular access complications (adjusted OR 3.4, CI 2.3-5, P < 0.001), and transfusion (adjusted OR 7, CI 5.4-9, P < 0.001). Hospital stay was longer in patients who developed CIN versus those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: CIN is not an uncommon complication associated with PVI, can be reliably predicted from pre-procedural variables, including a contrast dose of greater than three times the CCC and is strongly associated with the risk of in-hospital death, MI, stroke, transfusion, and increased hospital length of stay.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Peripheral , Contrast Media , Kidney Diseases , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Aged , Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/methods , Catheterization, Peripheral/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Contrast Media/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Incidence , Kidney Diseases/chemically induced , Kidney Diseases/epidemiology , Male , Michigan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/surgery , Prognosis , Quality Improvement , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
11.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 29(10): 340-351, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28420804

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe trends in the use of preprocedural P2Y12 inhibitors and their clinical impact in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Oral P2Y12 inhibitors are ubiquitously used medications; however, the specific timing of initial P2Y12 inhibitor administration remains intensely debated. METHODS: Our study population comprised 74,053 consecutive patients undergoing PCI at 47 hospitals in Michigan from January 2013 through June 2015. In-hospital outcomes included stent thrombosis, bleeding, need for transfusion, and death. Hierarchical logistic regression, propensity matching, and targeted maximum likelihood estimation were used to adjust for baseline patient differences and clustering, and to minimize bias. RESULTS: Of 24,733 patients who received a preprocedural P2Y12 inhibitor, 82% received clopidogrel, 8% prasugrel, and 10% ticagrelor. Preprocedural administration of P2Y12 inhibitors declined during the study (49.3% to 24.8%; P<.001), and varied greatly across hospitals (14.5%-95.9%). No significant differences in outcomes were observed between patients receiving preprocedural clopidogrel and a matched cohort of those not receiving any preprocedural P2Y12 inhibitor (stent thrombosis: adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-7.84; bleeding: OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.63-1.46; transfusion: OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.69-1.55; and death: OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.38-2.37). Similar findings were demonstrated for preprocedural ticagrelor and prasugrel. Results from a subgroup analysis of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (n = 28,072) were consistent with the overall findings. CONCLUSIONS: There was a substantial decline in the rate of preprocedural P2Y12 inhibitor administration during the study. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in outcomes between patients treated with preprocedural P2Y12 inhibitors and those who were not.


Subject(s)
Adenosine/analogs & derivatives , Hemorrhage , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Prasugrel Hydrochloride , Ticlopidine/analogs & derivatives , Adenosine/administration & dosage , Adenosine/adverse effects , Aged , Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Clopidogrel , Drug Utilization Review/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Female , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/epidemiology , Graft Occlusion, Vascular/etiology , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/ethnology , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Michigan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/administration & dosage , Prasugrel Hydrochloride/adverse effects , Preoperative Period , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists/adverse effects , Stents/adverse effects , Ticagrelor , Ticlopidine/administration & dosage , Ticlopidine/adverse effects , Time Factors
12.
J Palliat Med ; 20(1): 42-47, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27626711

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A majority of patients with poor-prognosis cancer express a preference for in-home death; however, in-hospital deaths are common. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify characteristics associated with in-hospital death. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING/SUBJECTS: Commercially insured patients with cancer who died between July 2010 and December 2013 and who had at least two outpatient visits at a tertiary cancer center during the last six months of life. MEASUREMENTS: Patient characteristics, healthcare utilization, and in-hospital death (primary outcome) were ascertained from institutional records and healthcare claims. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate the association of in-hospital death with patient characteristics and end-of-life outcome measures. RESULTS: We identified 904 decedents, with a median age of 59 years at death. In-hospital death was observed in 254 patients (28%), including 110 (12%) who died in an intensive care unit. Hematologic malignancy was associated with a 2.57 times increased risk of in-hospital death (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.91-3.45, p < 0.001), and nonenrollment in hospice was associated with a 14.5 times increased risk of in-hospital death (95% CI 9.81-21.4, p < 0.001). Time from cancer diagnosis to death was also associated with in-hospital death (p = 0.003), with the greatest risk among patients dying within six months of cancer diagnosis. All significant associations persisted in multivariable analyses that were adjusted for baseline characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital deaths are common among commercially insured cancer patients. Patients with hematologic malignancy and patients who die without receiving hospice services have a substantially higher incidence of in-hospital death.


Subject(s)
Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United States , Young Adult
14.
Am J Manag Care ; 21(5): e303-11, 2015 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26167778

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the roles of prices, poverty, and health in divergences between Medicare and private spending in Texas. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational design using 2011 Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas claims data and publicly available Medicare data. METHODS: We measured market-level spending per enrollee among the privately insured. Variation in Medicare and private spending per person are decomposed into prices and quantities, and their associations with poverty are measured. Markets are divided into 4 groups and are compared based on the ratio of Medicare to private spending: "high-private," "proportional," "high-Medicare," and "extremely high-Medicare." RESULTS: Among the privately insured, poverty appears to have large spillover effects; it is strongly associated with lower prices, quantities, and spending. Among Medicare beneficiaries, health status is a key driver of spending variation. The 2 markets with extremely high Medicare-to-private spending ratios (Harlingen and McAllen) are predominantly Hispanic communities with markedly higher rates of poverty and lack of insurance and also extremely low physician supply. The markets with relatively high private spending stand out for having good health-system performance and health outcomes, and higher than average hospital prices. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in private spending appears to reflect the ability of the local population to pay for healthcare, whereas variation in Medicare is more heavily driven by health status, and presumably, by clinical need. These findings highlight the inadvisability of using Medicare spending as a proxy for systemwide spending, and the need for comprehensive market-level spending data that allow comparisons among populations with different sources of insurance coverage.


Subject(s)
Commerce/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Status , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Poverty/statistics & numerical data , Private Sector/statistics & numerical data , Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Insurance Claim Review/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Texas , United States
15.
Med Care Res Rev ; 72(1): 96-112, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25550272

ABSTRACT

The recent relatively slow growth in health care spending masks significant differences among payers, clinical settings, and geographic areas. To better understand the spending slowdown, we focus on 2008-2012 trends in Texas among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries and enrollees in Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas (BCBSTX). Spending per person for Medicare grew only 1.5% per year on average, compared with 5.2% for BCBSTX. In Medicare, utilization rates were relatively flat, while prices grew more slowly than input prices. In BCBSTX, spending growth was driven by increases in negotiated prices, in particular hospital prices. We find that geographic variation declined sharply in Medicare, due to drops in spending on post-acute care in two notoriously high-spending regions but rose slightly in BCBSTX. The aggregate spending trends mask two divergent stories: spending growth in Medicare is very slow, but price increases continue to drive unsustainable spending growth among the privately insured.


Subject(s)
Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/economics , Fee-for-Service Plans/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/economics , Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Fee-for-Service Plans/statistics & numerical data , Financing, Personal/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Texas , United States
16.
Am Heart J ; 168(4): 552-9, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25262266

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is more common in women than in men. However, the relationship of sex and bleeding with outcomes is less well studied. METHODS: We examined the sex-related differences in the incidence of bleeding and its association with in-hospital outcomes among 96,637 patients undergoing PCI enrolled in the BMC2 registry (2010-2012). RESULTS: Women had higher bleeding rate than did men (3.9% vs 1.8%) and thus received more blood transfusions (59% vs 41%). Both men (odds ratio [OR] 2.25, 95% CI 1.70-2.97) and women (OR 3.13, 95% CI 2.42-4.07) who bled had higher risk-adjusted death compared with their counterparts without bleeding. Although there was no difference in adjusted mortality between women and men without bleeding (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.99-1.32), among patients who bled, adjusted death was higher in women (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.11-1.47). Among patients with bleeding, transfusion was associated with similar increased risk of death in both men (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.23-3.25) and women (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.31-3.63) compared with their counterparts without transfusion(s). CONCLUSIONS: Post-PCI bleeding was more common and associated with higher-than-expected in-hospital death in women compared with men with bleeding. This trend for higher death in women with bleeding was independent of transfusion. Quality efforts geared toward reducing bleeding in general, with a special focus on women, need to be explored to help reduce post PCI-bleeding and mortality and decrease sex-related disparity in adverse events.


Subject(s)
Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Registries , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Male , Michigan/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Sex Factors
20.
N C Med J ; 75(3): 195-7, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24830494

ABSTRACT

The health care industry is grappling with the challenges of working with and analyzing large, complex, diverse data sets. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina provides several promising examples of how big data can be used to reduce the cost of care, to predict and manage health risks, and to improve clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/organization & administration , Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/statistics & numerical data , Electronic Health Records/organization & administration , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Medical Informatics Applications , Medical Informatics Computing/statistics & numerical data , Medical Informatics/statistics & numerical data , American Recovery and Reinvestment Act , Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/economics , Blue Cross Blue Shield Insurance Plans/legislation & jurisprudence , Cost Control/statistics & numerical data , Data Collection/economics , Data Collection/statistics & numerical data , Electronic Health Records/economics , Electronic Health Records/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Medical Informatics Computing/economics , Medical Informatics Computing/legislation & jurisprudence , North Carolina , Obesity/etiology , Obesity/prevention & control , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/economics , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/organization & administration , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement/economics , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/statistics & numerical data , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...