Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 43(8): 1508-1515, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30181655

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective for percent body fat standards in the United States Army Body Composition Program (ABCP) is to ensure soldiers maintain optimal well-being and performance under all conditions. However, conducting large-scale experiments within the United States Army to evaluate the efficacy of the thresholds is challenging. METHODS: A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with corresponding area under the curve (AUC) was performed on body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference to determine optimal gender-specific age cohort thresholds that meet ABCP percent body fat standards in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III. A second dataset consisting of a cohort of basic training recruits (N = 20,896 soldiers, 28% female) with BMI and waist circumference measured using a 3D body image scanner was applied to calculate what percent of basic training recruits meet the ABCP percent body fat standards. Regression models to determine the contribution of different circumference sites to the predictions of percent body fat were developed using a database compiled at the New York Obesity Research Center (N = 500). RESULTS: Optimal BMI thresholds ranged from 23.65 kg/m2 (17-21-year-old cohort) to 26.55 kg/m2 (40 and over age cohort) for males and 21.75 to 24.85 kg/m2 for females. The AUC values were between 0.86 and 0.92. The waist circumference thresholds ranged 81.35 to 97.55 cm for males and 77.05 to 89.35 cm for females with AUC values between 0.90 and 0.91. These BMI thresholds were exceeded by 65% of male and 74% of female basic training recruits and waist circumference thresholds were exceeded by 73% of male and 85% of female recruits. The single circumference that contributed most to prediction of body fat was waist circumference in males and mid-thigh circumference in females. CONCLUSIONS: The ABCP percent body fat thresholds yield BMI thresholds that are below the United States Army BMI standards, especially in females which suggests the ABCP percent body fat standards may be too restrictive. The United States Army percent body fat standards could instead be matched to existing national health guidelines.


Subject(s)
Body Fat Distribution/standards , Body Mass Index , Military Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Waist Circumference/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Area Under Curve , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Nutrition Surveys , ROC Curve , Reference Standards , Sex Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
Sci Rep ; 8(1): 16268, 2018 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30389952

ABSTRACT

Ultrasound (US) provides the most accurate technique for thickness measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) layers. This US method was recently standardised using eight sites to capture SAT patterning and allows distinguishing between fat and embedded fibrous structures. These eight sites chosen for fat patterning studies do not represent the mean SAT thickness measured all over the body that is necessary for determining subcutaneous fat mass. This was obtained by SAT measurements at 216 sites distributed randomly all over the body. Ten participants with BMI below 28.5kgm-2 and SAT means (from eight sites) ranging from 3 mm to 10 mm were selected. The means from eight sites overestimated the means obtained from 216 sites (i.e. 2160 US measurements in the ten participants); the calibration factor of 0.65 corrects this; standard deviation (SD) was 0.05, i.e. 8%. The SD of the calibration factor transforms linearly when estimating the error range of the whole body's SAT volume (body surface area times the calibrated mean SAT thickness). The SAT masses ranged from 3.2 to 12.4 kg in this group. The standard deviations resulting from solely the calibration factor uncertainty were ±0.3 and ±1.0 kg, respectively. For these examples, the SAT percentages were 4.9(±0.4)% and 13.3(±1.0)%.


Subject(s)
Anthropometry/methods , Body Fat Distribution/methods , Subcutaneous Fat/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Body Fat Distribution/standards , Body Mass Index , Calibration , Humans , Male , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Ultrasonography/methods , Ultrasonography/standards , Young Adult
3.
Arch. med. deporte ; 32(168): 208-214, jul.-ago. 2015. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-148403

ABSTRACT

Existen múltiples ecuaciones antropométricas descritas en la literatura para estimar el porcentaje de masa grasa corporal. Sin embargo, no existe un consenso acerca de la mejor ecuación para estimar la masa grasa en futbolistas. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar los porcentajes de masa grasa corporal obtenidos a partir de ecuaciones antropométricas habitualmente utilizadas para estimar composición corporal, con la absorciometría dual de rayos X (DEXA), en futbolistas jóvenes de élite. Se evaluaron 43 futbolistas seleccionados nacionales jóvenes (edad: 16,9 ± 1,3 años), a los cuales se les estimó el porcentaje de grasa corporal utilizando nueve ecuaciones, y se comparó con el porcentaje de grasa obtenido con la evaluación de DEXA. El porcentaje grasa corporal estimado por las ecuaciones antropométricas de Faulkner (% grasa: 11,1 ± 1,6%) y Slaughter (11,5 ± 3,2%), además de las ecuaciones para estimar densidad corporal (y luego masa grasa a través de la ecuación de Brozek) de Wilmore & Behnke (11,7 ± 1,7%), Jackson & Pollock (11,8 ± 3,7%), Durnin & Womersley (12,9 ± 2,9%) y Withers (10,4 ± 2,5%) no mostraron diferencias significativas con DEXA (12,9 ± 4,1%). De todas ellas, la ecuación de Durnin & Womersley mostró menor diferencia intermétodo con DEXA (0,06 ± 2,0%), aunque sin diferencias significativas con las diferencias intermétodo de las ecuaciones de Slaughter (-1,3 ± 2,5%), Wilmore & Behnke (-1,2 ± 3,0%) y Jackson & Pollock (-1,1 ± 2,8%). Al correlacionar todas las ecuaciones antropométricas con DEXA se obtuvieron coeficientes de Spearman entre 0,45 y 0,88 (p < 0.05). En conclusión, las ecuaciones de Durnin & Womersley, Slaughter, Wilmore & Behnke y Jackson & Pollock son las más cercanas al método de referencia cuando son utilizadas en futbolistas jóvenes


There are multiple anthropometric equations described in the literature to estimate the body fat mass, but there are some variations between them, with no consensus on which one is the best equation for estimating fat mass for specific populations. The aim of this study was to compare the percentages of body fat mass obtained from anthropometric equations commonly used to estimate body fat, with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as gold standard, in young Chilean elite soccer players. 43 soccer players from young national teams were assessed (age: 16.9 ± 1.3 y). The percentage of body fat using nine equations was estimated and compared with the percentage of fat obtained from DEXA. The percentage of body fat estimated by the anthropometric equations from Faulkner (11.1 ± 1.6%) and Slaughter (11.5 ± 3.2%), plus body density equations (and fat mass estimated through Brozek equation) from Wilmore & Behnke (11.7 ± 1.7%), Jackson & Pollock (11.8 ± 3.7%), Durnin & Womersley (12.9 ± 2.9%) and Withers (10.4 ± 2.5%) showed no significant difference with the measurement performed with DEXA (12.9 ± 4 1%). Of these, the equation of Durnin & Womersley, showed less inter-method difference with DEXA (0.06 ± 2.0%), although no significant differences with inter-method differences from the equations of Slaughter (-1.3 ± 2.5%), Wilmore & Behnke (-1.2 ± 3.0%) and Jackson & Pollock (-3.6 ± 2.8%) were found. The correlations of the equations with DEXA measurement showed that the Spearman coefficient resulted between 0.45 and 0.88, all statistically significant. In conclusion, the equations of Durnin & Womersley, Slaughter, Wilmore & Behnke and Jackson & Pollock are those that come closest to the reference method to be used in young soccer players


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Young Adult , Body Mass Index , Anthropometry/instrumentation , Anthropometry/methods , Absorptiometry, Photon/instrumentation , Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Absorptiometry, Photon , Adiposity/physiology , Skinfold Thickness , Body Composition/physiology , Body Fat Distribution/standards , Soccer/trends
4.
BMC Nephrol ; 12: 52, 2011 Oct 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21970591

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Renal sinus fat may mediate obesity-related vascular disease, although this fat depot has not been assessed in a community-based sample. We sought to develop a protocol to quantify renal sinus fat accumulation using multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). METHODS: Protocol development was performed in participants in the Framingham Offspring cohort who underwent MDCT. Volumetric renal sinus fat was measured separately within the right and left kidneys, and renal sinus fat area within a single MDCT scan slice was measured in the right kidney. Due to the high correlation of volumetric and single-slice renal sinus fat in the right kidney (Pearson correlation [r] = 0.85, p < 0.0001), we optimized a single-slice protocol to capture renal sinus fat in the right kidney alone. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to compare to assess the correlation of volumetric and single-slice renal sinus fat in the right kidney with other measures of adiposity. Inter- and intra-reader reproducibility was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Single-slice measurements were obtained in 92 participants (mean age 60 years, 49% women, median renal sinus fat 0.43 cm2). Intra- and inter-reader intra-class correlation coefficients were 0.93 and 0.86, respectively. Single-slice renal sinus fat was correlated with body mass index (r = 0.35, p = 0.0006), waist circumference (r = 0.31, p = 0.003), and abdominal visceral fat (r = 0.48, p < 0.0001). Similar correlations were observed for volumetric renal sinus fat in the right kidney. CONCLUSIONS: Measuring renal sinus fat is feasible and reproducible using MDCT scans in a community-based sample.


Subject(s)
Body Fat Distribution/methods , Body Fat Distribution/standards , Intra-Abdominal Fat/diagnostic imaging , Obesity/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , Adiposity , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Fat Distribution/statistics & numerical data , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Kidney/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data
6.
Eur J Pediatr ; 169(11): 1329-35, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20505952

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Childhood obesity is a major worldwide health problem. In addition to body mass index (BMI), body fat percentiles may be used to predict future cardiovascular and metabolic health risks. The aim of this study is to define new age- and gender-specific body fat centiles for Turkish children and adolescents. A total of 4,076 (2,276 girls, 1,800 boys) children and adolescents aged 6-18 years were recruited for this study. Total body fat was measured by a bioelectrical impedance noninvasive method. Body fat percentiles were produced by the LMS method. The body fat percentile curves of boys appear to rise from age 6 to 12 years and then slope downwards to age 15 years and then flatten off. The body fat % percentiles of girls increased until 14 years of age through 75th to 97th percentiles and then slope downwards, but through the third to 50th percentiles, they showed a downward slope after 14 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Since BMI may not always reflect body fat content, direct assessment of adiposity by a practical method would be significantly useful for clinical decisions. Therefore, this study provides normative data for body fat percentage in healthy Turkish children and adolescents. To this goal we used a practical and clinically applicable method. These references can be useful for evaluation of overweight and obesity.


Subject(s)
Body Fat Distribution/standards , Obesity/epidemiology , Overweight/epidemiology , Adipose Tissue , Adolescent , Body Mass Index , Child , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Turkey/epidemiology
7.
N Z Med J ; 123(1311): 22-9, 2010 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20360793

ABSTRACT

AIM: To develop ethnic-specific body mass index (BMI) cut-off points for overweight and obesity in girls from New Zealand's five major ethnic groups. METHODS: A total of 1676 girls (41% European, 21% Pacific Island, 15% East Asian, 13% Maori, and 11% South Asian) aged 5-16 years participated in this study. BMI was determined from height and weight, and body fat percentage (%BF) was obtained from hand-to-foot bioelectrical impedance measurements. Using stepwise multiple regression, a series of ethnic-specific BMI cut-off points were developed that corresponded to the equivalent %BF of European girls at the BMI reference values provided by the International Obesity TaskForce (IOTF). RESULTS: The adjusted cut-off points for overweight and obesity ranged from an average of 3.3 and 3.8 kg.m(-2) (respectively) lower than the IOTF standards in South Asian girls to 1.5 and 1.9 kg.m(-2) higher in Pacific Island girls. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the ethnic-specific BMI cut-off points developed in this study are more appropriate than universal definitions of overweight and obesity for predicting excess adiposity in New Zealand girls.


Subject(s)
Adiposity/ethnology , Body Fat Distribution/standards , Body Mass Index , Ethnicity , Obesity/ethnology , Overweight/ethnology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Morbidity/trends , New Zealand/epidemiology , Reference Values
8.
Obesity (Silver Spring) ; 18(6): 1242-6, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20150903

ABSTRACT

It has been widely assumed that for a given BMI, Asians have higher percent body fat (PBF) than whites, and that the BMI threshold for defining obesity in Asians should be lower than the threshold for whites. This study sought to test this assumption by comparing the PBF between US white and Vietnamese women. The study was designed as a comparative cross-sectional investigation. In the first study, 210 Vietnamese women ages between 50 and 85 were randomly selected from various districts in Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam). In the second study, 419 women of the same age range were randomly selected from the Rancho Bernardo Study (San Diego, CA). In both studies, lean mass (LM) and fat mass (FM) were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (QDR 4500; Hologic). PBF was derived as FM over body weight. Compared with Vietnamese women, white women had much more FM (24.8 +/- 8.1 kg vs. 18.8 +/- 4.9 kg; P < 0.0001) and greater PBF (36.4 +/- 6.5% vs. 35.0 +/- 6.2%; P = 0.012). However, there was no significant difference in PBF between the two groups after matching for BMI (35.1 +/- 6.2% vs. 35.0 +/- 5.7%; P = 0.87) or for age and BMI (35.6 +/- 5.1% vs. 35.8 +/- 5.9%; P = 0.79). Using the criteria of BMI >or=30, 19% of US white women and 5% of Vietnamese women were classified as obese. Approximately 54% of US white women and 53% of Vietnamese women had their PBF >35% (P = 0.80). Although white women had greater BMI, body weight, and FM than Vietnamese women, their PBF was virtually identical. Further research is required to derive a more appropriate BMI threshold for defining obesity for Asian women.


Subject(s)
Asian People/statistics & numerical data , Body Fat Distribution/statistics & numerical data , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/ethnology , White People/statistics & numerical data , Adiposity/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Fat Distribution/standards , Body Mass Index , California/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Matched-Pair Analysis , Middle Aged , Obesity/epidemiology , Reference Values , Vietnam/epidemiology , Vietnam/ethnology
9.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 31(2): 430-9, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20099357

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To obtain quantitative measures of human body fat compartments from whole body MR datasets for the risk estimation in subjects prone to metabolic diseases without the need of any user interaction or expert knowledge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sets of axial T1-weighted spin-echo images of the whole body were acquired. The images were segmented using a modified fuzzy c-means algorithm. A separation of the body into anatomic regions along the body axis was performed to define regions with visceral adipose tissue present, and to standardize the results. In abdominal image slices, the adipose tissue compartments were divided into subcutaneous and visceral compartments using an extended snake algorithm. The slice-wise areas of different tissues were plotted along the slice position to obtain topographic fat tissue distributions. RESULTS: Results from automatic segmentation were compared with manual segmentation. Relatively low mean deviations were obtained for the class of total tissue (4.48%) and visceral adipose tissue (3.26%). The deviation of total adipose tissue was slightly higher (8.71%). CONCLUSION: The proposed algorithm enables the reliable and completely automatic creation of adipose tissue distribution profiles of the whole body from multislice MR datasets, reducing whole examination and analysis time to less than half an hour.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/anatomy & histology , Body Fat Distribution/methods , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Pattern Recognition, Automated/methods , Whole Body Imaging/methods , Algorithms , Artificial Intelligence , Body Fat Distribution/standards , Germany , Humans , Image Enhancement/methods , Image Enhancement/standards , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/standards , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/standards , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Whole Body Imaging/standards
10.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 31(12): 1798-805, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17607324

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To present body fat patterning reference standards to identify children with a predominant distribution of body fat in the abdominal or truncal region of the body. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study in a representative sample of Spanish adolescents aged 13-18 years. SUBJECTS: A total of 2160 adolescents with a complete set of anthropometric measurements (1109 males and 1051 females). MEASUREMENTS: Weight, height, body mass index, skinfold thickness (biceps, triceps, subscapular, suprailiac, thigh, calf) and waist and hip circumferences. RESULTS: In the majority of the age groups, subscapular/triceps skinfolds ratio, trunk-to-total skinfolds percent (TTS%)and waist circumference values were significantly higher in males than in females; hip circumference was higher in females than in males, except at 15.5 years. In males, age showed a significant effect for all the body fat distribution indices; however, in females, the effect was only significant for triceps skinfold, waist and hip circumferences and waist-to-hip ratio. Smoothed age- and sex-specific triceps skinfold, subscapular skinfold, subscapular/triceps skinfolds ratio, TTS%, waist circumference and hip circumference, waist-to-hip and waist-to-height ratio percentile values for male and female adolescents have been established. CONCLUSION: These reference data for waist circumference and the other fat patterning indices, together with data from other countries, will help to establish international central obesity criteria for adolescents. The presented percentile values will give the possibility to estimate the proportion of adolescents with high or low regional adiposity amounts.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Fat/anatomy & histology , Body Fat Distribution/standards , Abdominal Fat/physiology , Adolescent , Age Distribution , Body Mass Index , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Obesity/classification , Obesity/etiology , Reference Values , Sex Distribution , Skinfold Thickness , Spain , Statistics as Topic
11.
Med Hypotheses ; 68(6): 1272-5, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17156939

ABSTRACT

Waist circumference (WC) is globally used as a parameter to quantify central obesity, the key culprit in insulin resistance and related disorders. Hitherto globally in various definitions of metabolic syndrome and risk scores, WC is used to quantify central obesity. For defining central obesity, which is a single entity numerous WC cutoffs have been suggested, separately for males and females and various races. We believe that this difference is amenable to differences in their average heights. To quantify proportion of visceral fat in the total body fat, WC alone is not sufficient. We hereby hypothesize that Index of central obesity (ICO) defined by us, as a ratio of WC and height is a better parameter of central obesity. If ICO is used in place of WC we may do away with various WC cutoffs and may have a single cutoff applicable to all races and both genders. Using average heights of various countries and their respective WC cutoffs suggested by IDF consensus definition for defining metabolic syndrome (MS) we derived their ICO cutoffs mathematically. The ICO cutoffs obtained ranged from 0.51 to 0.58 among males and 0.47 to 0.54 among females. The range has narrowed down compared to wide range of cutoffs for WC i.e. 90-102 cm for males and 80-88 cm for females. To test superiority of ICO over WC even among people of same race and same gender we conducted a pilot study in which, we compared two subjects with same WC and body mass index (BMI), though they differed in their stature. Body fat distribution was compared on DEXA and oral glucose tolerance was tested. Percentage of total body fat contributed by truncal fat was 36.11% in taller subject (Dr. P) and 46.31% in the shorter one (Mr. P). On investigation Dr P had normal glucose tolerance while Mr. P was diagnosed to be diabetic. These differences unexplained by identical WC and BMI could be explained by difference in their ICO (0.557 vs 0.645). ICO has a potential to be a better parameter of central obesity. It may obviate the need for numerous WC cutoffs and may even be applicable to children where existing parameters are not useful.


Subject(s)
Body Height , Models, Biological , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/pathology , Absorptiometry, Photon , Adult , Anthropometry , Blood Glucose/analysis , Body Fat Distribution/standards , Body Mass Index , Female , Glucose Tolerance Test , Humans , Male , Obesity/blood , Obesity/ethnology , Pilot Projects
12.
Nutr. hosp ; 17(supl.1): 42-48, 2002.
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-142958

ABSTRACT

La leptina, identificada en el año 1994 como una sustancia sintetizada en el tejido adiposo en cantidades proporcionales a la magnitud de las reservas grasas, se ha descrito como un factor importante en la regulación de la homeostasis energética del organismo, puesto que es capaz de inhibir la ingesta, estimular el gasto energético y regular otros procesos metabólicos periféricos implicados en el control de la expansión de la grasa corporal (secreción de insulina, lipólisis, transporte de glucosa). Sin embargo, la leptina es una sustancia pleiotrópica involucrada también en procesos de fertilidad, inflamación y en la angiogénesis, entre otros. Si bien estas acciones han estado bien delimitadas en algunos modelos animales de obesidad, el papel que desempeña la leptina en el hombre es menos claro, puesto que, al menos a nivel hipotalámico, parece existir una importante resistencia a los efectos de esta hormona. Los estudios administrando leptina recombinante realizados recientemente en humanos no aportan resultados suficientemente esperanzadores, puesto que no consiguen pérdidas de peso mayores a las que podemos obtener con otros fármacos existentes en el mercado actual y su administración subcutánea provoca algunos efectos secundarios indeseables. De todos modos, los resultados obtenidos deben ser considerados con cautela, siendo necesarios más estudios referidos a la actividad bioló- gica de la leptina en humanos que permitan determinar la repercusión clínica de la administración de esta hormona (AU)


Leptin, identified in 1994 as a substance synthesized in adipose tissue in amounts that are proportional to the magnitude of fat reserves, has been described as an important factor in the regulation of the body•s energy homeostasis as it is capable of inhibiting intake, stimulating energy expenditure and regulating other peripheral metabolic processes involved in the control of the spread of body fat (secretion of insulin, lipolysis, glucose transport). Nonetheless, leptin is a pleotropic substance also involved in fertility, inflammation and angiogenesis processes, among others. Although these actions have been well defined in certain animal models of obesity, the role played by leptin in humans is less clear since, at least at the hypothalamic level, there seems to be considerable resistance to the effects of this hormone. The trials which administered recombinant leptin to humans recently have not provided sufficiently hopeful results as the weight reductions obtained have not been greater than those achieved with other drugs currently available on the market and its subcutaneous administration has led to some undesirable side effects. In any case, the results obtained must be treated with caution, with further trials being needed on the biological activity of leptin in humans in order to determine the clinical repercussions of the administration of this hormone (AU)


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Leptin/metabolism , Leptin/therapeutic use , Homeostasis/physiology , Energy Metabolism/physiology , Lipolysis/physiology , Neuropeptides/metabolism , Neuropeptides/therapeutic use , Obesity/diet therapy , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/metabolism , Body Fat Distribution/standards , Angiogenesis Inducing Agents/therapeutic use , Body Weight/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...