Improving knowledge of doctors and paramedics through effective bone procurement workshop: A cognitive approach.

BACKGROUND: Procurement of bone allograft must be performed by trained personnel. Improper handling and lack of knowledge during bone procurement will lead to contamination hence jeopardizing quality of the procured bones and expose bone recipients to risks of infection in post-operative phase. Bone procurement workshop is the fundamental training programme to enhance skill among personnel who has been or will be involved in bone procurement. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the workshop contents including teaching materials by assessing the knowledge on bone procurement among the participants before and after the workshop. METHODS: Bone procurement workshop was held for 2 days for doctors and paramedics. The knowledge on bone procurement was evaluated in pre- and post-assessments by answering self administration questionnaire before and after the workshop, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 50 participants comprised of doctors and paramedics attended the workshop however only 15 (55.6%) doctors and 12 (44.4%) paramedics completed the assessments. Overall, the mean total score for the post-assessment (61.4%) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of the pre-assessment score (32.2%). The mean values of correct responses for the post-assessment was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of the pre-assessment in all five topics given during the workshop. The correct responses for the pre- and the post- assessments in the respective group of the doctors and paramedics were also statistically significant (p < 0.05). In the pre-assessment, the doctors had the highest score in Surgical Approach & Reconstruction (50%) while the paramedics had the highest score in Donor Screening & Selection Criteria (33.3%). In the post-assessment, the doctors had the highest score in Donor Screening & Selection Criteria (70%) while the paramedics in Packaging & Transportation (65.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The assessment managed to show that the workshop contents and teaching materials were effective in improving the cognitive knowledge of the personnel who would get involved in bone procurement under the National Donation Programme.

Bone surrogates provide authentic onlay graft fixation torques.

Onlay graft bone augmentation is a standard practice to restore the loss of height of the alveolar ridge following loss of a tooth. Cranial grafts, lifted from the parietal bone, are sandwiched and used to bridge the bony defect in the jaw by means of small screws. During the elevation of the covering gum and subsequent screw placement, care has to be taken in order to preserve underlying nerves. Therefore, to avoid harm to the patient, a solid education of surgeons is essential, which requires training and experience. A simulator for cranial graft-lift training was already developed and shall be expanded to train the augmentation of the lifted implants. Therefore, in this study, synthetic bones for onlay block graft screw placement with realistic haptics for the screw application training were evaluated and compared with human specimens. Six different polyurethane based bone surrogate composites, enriched with varying amounts of calcium-based mineral fillers and blowing agents, were developed. The haptical properties of these synthetic bones were validated for screw placement and compared with human parietal bone specimens. For that, bones were pre-drilled, screws were automatically inserted using a customized testbench and the slope of the screw-insertion torques were analyzed. The slope of the screw insertion torques of the human reference bones was 56.5 ±â€¯14.0 * 10-3 Nm/deg, Surrogates with lower amounts of mineral fillers and blowing agents showed lower torques than the human bone. Synthetic bones, validated for drilling, milling and sawing in an earlier study, also achieved significantly lower torques, which were only the half of the human parietal bones. Two intermediate stages of the aforementioned material compositions, consisting of 75% mineral filler with 0.75% blowing agent and 100% mineral filler with 1.00% blowing agent revealed results comparable with human bone (57.4 ±â€¯10.2 *10-3 Nm/deg, p = 0.893 and 54.9 ±â€¯11.1 *10-3 Nm/deg, p = 0.795, respectively). In conclusion, our findings suggest that, two newly developed polyurethane-based materials mimicking the haptical properties of an onlay bone graft screw fixation, have been identified. Thus, these surrogates are capable of mimicking real bone tissue in our simulator for the education of novice surgeons.

Validation of a simulator for cranial graft lift training: Face, content, and construct validity.

PURPOSE: Surgical skills can be improved through practical exercise. The use of specimens, human as well as animal, or live animals for surgical training is limited due to ethical concerns. Drawbacks of simulators are costs, fidelity and creditibility. Thus, simulators must be evaluated objectively to determine their validity before they can be used as teaching modalities. The aim of this study was to verify the face content and construct validity of a novel model-based simulator for lifting tabula externa transplants from the parietal skull. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were invited to perform a tabula externa graft lift during a training session on the simulator. Task performance was analyzed with a standardized assessment tool evaluating realism and appropriateness. Specialist ratings were used to evaluate the performance of the participants. This was an exploratory study using a questionnaire, at Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria, a university hospital. According to their expertise in craniomaxillofacial surgery, 17 participants were subdivided into 3 groups: 8 novices, 7 experts and 2 raters. RESULTS: The face validity (realism) obtained an average score of 4.2 of a maximum of 5 points. Likewise, the content validity (appropriateness as a teaching modality) obtained an average score of 4.8 of maximum 5 points. No differences were found between experts and novices concerning the recorded surgery completion times (p = 0.418) or the sizes of the lifted grafts (p = 0.110). During the evaluation of task performance, the expert surgeons (46.9 ± 3.7) were graded significantly better than the novices (36.4 ± 8.5), which proved the construct validity of the simulator (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: All investigated validities were confirmed and approved the simulator as a valid training tool for parietal graft lift.