Influence of negative pressure wound therapy on peri-prosthetic tissue vascularization and inflammation around porous titanium percutaneous devices.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) has been shown to limit downgrowth around percutaneous devices in a guinea pig model. However, the influence of NPWT on peri-prosthetic tissue characteristics leading to limited downgrowth is still unclear. In order to investigate this, 12 CD hairless rats were assigned into two groups, NPWT and Untreated (n = 6/group). Each animal was implanted with a porous coated titanium percutaneous device and was dressed with a gauze and semi-occlusive base dressing. Post-surgery, animals in the NPWT Group received a regimen of NPWT treatment (-70 to -90 mmHg). After 4 weeks, tissue was collected over the device and stained with CD31 and CD68 to quantify blood vessel density and inflammation, respectively. The device with the surrounding tissue was also collected to quantify downgrowth. NPWT treatment led to a 1.6-fold increase in blood vessel densities compared to untreated tissues (p < 0.05). NPWT treatment also resulted in half the downgrowth as the Untreated Group, although not statistically significant (p = 0.19). Additionally, the results showed a trend toward increased CD68 cell densities in the NPWT Group compared to the Untreated Group (p = 0.09). These findings suggest that NPWT may influence wound healing responses in percutaneous devices by increasing blood vessel densities, limiting downgrowth and potentially increasing inflammation. Overall, NPWT may enhance tissue vascularity around percutaneous devices, especially in patients with impaired wound healing. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 107B: 2091-2101, 2019.

Poly-ε-caprolactone Coated and Functionalized Porous Titanium and Magnesium Implants for Enhancing Angiogenesis in Critically Sized Bone Defects.

For healing of critically sized bone defects, biocompatible and angiogenesis supporting implants are favorable. Murine osteoblasts showed equal proliferation behavior on the polymers poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) and poly-(3-hydroxybutyrate)/poly-(4-hydroxybutyrate) (P(3HB)/P(4HB)). As vitality was significantly better for PCL, it was chosen as a suitable coating material for further experiments. Titanium implants with 600 µm pore size were evaluated and found to be a good implant material for bone, as primary osteoblasts showed a vitality and proliferation onto the implants comparable to well bottom (WB). Pure porous titanium implants and PCL coated porous titanium implants were compared using Live Cell Imaging (LCI) with Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-osteoblasts. Cell count and cell covered area did not differ between the implants after seven days. To improve ingrowth of blood vessels into porous implants, proangiogenic factors like Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1) were incorporated into PCL coated, porous titanium and magnesium implants. An angiogenesis assay was performed to establish an in vitro method for evaluating the impact of metallic implants on angiogenesis to reduce and refine animal experiments in future. Incorporated concentrations of proangiogenic factors were probably too low, as they did not lead to any effect. Magnesium implants did not yield evaluable results, as they led to pH increase and subsequent cell death.