Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34
Filter
1.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) ; 28(2): 2309499020930291, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32529908

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine consensus among Asia-Pacific surgeons regarding nonoperative management for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). METHODS: An online REDCap questionnaire was circulated to surgeons in the Asia-Pacific region during the period of July 2019 to September 2019 to inquire about various components of nonoperative treatment for AIS. Aspects under study included access to screening, when MRIs were obtained, quality-of-life assessments used, role of scoliosis-specific exercises, bracing criteria, type of brace used, maturity parameters used, brace wear regimen, follow-up criteria, and how braces were weaned. Comparisons were made between middle-high income and low-income countries, and experience with nonoperative treatment. RESULTS: A total of 103 responses were collected. About half (52.4%) of the responders had scoliosis screening programs and were particularly situated in middle-high income countries. Up to 34% obtained MRIs for all cases, while most would obtain MRIs for neurological problems. The brace criteria were highly variable and was usually based on menarche status (74.7%), age (59%), and Risser staging (92.8%). Up to 52.4% of surgeons elected to brace patients with large curves before offering surgery. Only 28% of responders utilized CAD-CAM techniques for brace fabrication and most (76.8%) still utilized negative molds. There were no standardized criteria for brace weaning. CONCLUSION: There are highly variable practices related to nonoperative treatment for AIS and may be related to availability of resources in certain countries. Relative consensus was achieved for when MRI should be obtained and an acceptable brace compliance should be more than 16 hours a day.


Subject(s)
Braces , Orthopedic Procedures , Scoliosis/therapy , Adolescent , Asia/epidemiology , Braces/economics , Braces/statistics & numerical data , Child , Consensus , Conservative Treatment/economics , Conservative Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Disease Progression , Female , Focus Groups , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Internet , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Male , Oceania/epidemiology , Orthopedic Procedures/economics , Orthopedic Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Scoliosis/diagnosis , Scoliosis/economics , Scoliosis/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors , Treatment Outcome
2.
Lancet ; 395(10222): 441-448, 2020 02 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32035553

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with Achilles tendon rupture who have non-operative treatment have traditionally been treated with immobilisation of the tendon in plaster casts for several weeks. Functional bracing is an alternative non-operative treatment that allows earlier mobilisation, but evidence on its effectiveness and safety is scarce. The aim of the UKSTAR trial was to compare functional and quality-of-life outcomes and resource use in patients treated non-operatively with plaster cast versus functional brace. METHODS: UKSTAR was a pragmatic, superiority, multicentre, randomised controlled trial done at 39 hospitals in the UK. Patients (aged ≥16 years) who were being treated non-operatively for a primary Achilles tendon rupture at the participating centres were potentially eligible. The exclusion criteria were presenting more than 14 days after injury, previous rupture of the same Achilles tendon, or being unable to complete the questionnaires. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a plaster cast or functional brace using a centralised web-based system. Because the interventions were clearly visible, neither patients nor clinicians could be masked. Participants wore the intervention for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was patient-reported Achilles tendon rupture score (ATRS) at 9 months, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population (all patients in the groups to which they were allocated, excluding participants who withdrew or died before providing any outcome data). The main safety outcome was the incidence of tendon re-rupture. Resource use was recorded from a health and personal social care perspective. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN62639639. FINDINGS: Between Aug 15, 2016, and May 31, 2018, 1451 patients were screened, of whom 540 participants (mean age 48·7 years, 79% male) were randomly allocated to receive plaster cast (n=266) or functional brace (n=274). 527 (98%) of 540 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population, and 13 (2%) were excluded because they withdrew or died before providing any outcome data. There was no difference in ATRS at 9 months post injury (cast group n=244, mean ATRS 74∙4 [SD 19∙8]; functional brace group n=259, ATRS 72∙8 [20∙4]; adjusted mean difference -1∙38 [95% CI -4∙9 to 2∙1], p=0·44). There was no difference in the rate of re-rupture of the tendon (17 [6%] of 266 in the plaster cast group vs 13 [5%] of 274 in the functional brace group, p=0·40). The mean total health and personal social care cost was £1181 for the plaster cast group and £1078 for the functional bract group (mean between-group difference -£103 [95% CI -289 to 84]). INTERPRETATION: Traditional plaster casting was not found to be superior to early weight-bearing in a functional brace, as measured by ATRS, in the management of patients treated non-surgically for Achilles tendon rupture. Clinicians may consider the use of early weight-bearing in a functional brace as a safe and cost-effective alternative to plaster casting. FUNDING: UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.


Subject(s)
Achilles Tendon/injuries , Braces , Casts, Surgical , Adult , Braces/adverse effects , Braces/economics , Casts, Surgical/adverse effects , Casts, Surgical/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Immobilization/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Rupture/therapy , Weight-Bearing
3.
J Pediatr Orthop ; 39(8): e586-e591, 2019 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31393294

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Multiple randomized trials have showed equivalent outcomes and improved patient/family satisfaction using a removable brace to treat pediatric distal radius buckle fractures (DRBF). We tested the hypothesis that we could use quality improvement (QI) methodology to increase the proportion of patients with DRBF treated with removable braces at 2 tertiary care orthopaedic clinics from a baseline of 34.8% to 80%. METHODS: Clinic billing records were reviewed monthly to determine treatment (brace vs. cast) of DRBF and tracked using control charts (p-chart). Balance measures including correct application of the diagnostic criteria and algorithm were monitored. Process measures including the number of follow-up visits, radiographs obtained, and total cost of treatment were collected. Baseline data were obtained over a 3-month period, followed by a 12-month period of interventions using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles targeting both individuals and groups of providers. RESULTS: The proportion of DRBF treated in a brace increased from a combined baseline of 34.8% to a combined 84% at the end of the study period. Following intervention, 83% (15/18) of providers began using braces for a majority of patients (defined as >67%), with only 1 provider continuing to use casts 100% of the time. Patient preference was cited as the most common reason for use of cast treatment. There was a significant decrease in the number of radiographs obtained at 1 of 2 institutions. The charges for brace treatment averaged $630 less per patient than for cast treatment, leading to an estimated medical-cost savings of $205,000 following intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of brace treatment for pediatric DRBF using QI methodology resulted in a shift toward brace treatment in the majority of patients, leading to substantial medical and nonmedical cost savings. Although patient preference was cited as the most common reason for persistent cast treatment, the data show the use of cast treatment to be more dependent upon individual provider preference. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-therapeutic.


Subject(s)
Braces/trends , Casts, Surgical/trends , Quality Improvement , Radius Fractures/therapy , Braces/economics , Casts, Surgical/economics , Child , Cost Savings , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Patient Satisfaction , Radiography , Radius Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Radius Fractures/economics
4.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 19(1): 72, 2018 03 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29499667

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Around 100,000 children are born annually with clubfoot worldwide and 80% live in low and middle-income counties (LMICs). Clubfoot is a condition in which children are born with one or both feet twisted inwards and if untreated it can limit participation in everyday life. Clubfoot can be corrected through staged manipulation of the limbs using the Ponseti method. Despite its efficacy and apparent availability, previous research has identified a number of challenges to service implementation. The aim of this study was to synthesise these findings to explore factors that impact on the implementation of clubfoot services in LMICs and strategies to address them. Understanding these may help practitioners in other settings develop more effective services. METHODS: Five databases were searched and articles screened using six criteria. Articles were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. 11 studies were identified for inclusion. A thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Thematic analysis of the included studies showed that a lack of access to resources was a challenge including a lack of casting materials and abduction braces. Difficulties within the working environment included limited space and a need to share treatment space with other clinics. A shortage of healthcare professionals was a concern and participants thought that there was a lack of time to deliver treatment. This was exacerbated by the competing demands on clinicians. Lack of training was seen to impact on standards, including the nurses and midwives attending to the child at birth that were failing to diagnose the condition. Financial constraints were seen to underlie many of these problems. Some participants identified failures in communication and cooperation within the healthcare system such as a lack of awareness of clinics. Strategies to address these issues included means of increasing resource availability and the delivery of targeted training. The use of non-governmental organisations to provide financial support and methods to disseminate best practice were discussed. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified factors that impact on the implementation of clubfoot services in LMIC settings.Findings may be used to improve service delivery.


Subject(s)
Clubfoot/economics , Clubfoot/therapy , Developing Countries/economics , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Poverty/economics , Qualitative Research , Braces/economics , Braces/trends , Clubfoot/epidemiology , Health Services Accessibility/trends , Humans , Poverty/trends
5.
Spine J ; 18(9): 1513-1525, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29355785

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Bracing is often used after spinal surgery to immobilize the spine, improve fusion, and relieve pain. However, controversy exists regarding the efficacy, necessity, and safety of various bracing techniques in the postsurgical setting. PURPOSE: In this systematic review, we aimed to compare the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of postoperative bracing versus no postoperative bracing after spinal surgery in patients with several common operative spinal pathologies. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A systematic review was carried out to compare postoperative bracing and no postoperative bracing. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted of MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Collaboration Library from 1970 to May 2017, supplemented by manual searching of the reference list of relevant studies and previously published reviews. Studies were included if they compared disability, quality of life, functional impairment, radiographic outcomes, cost-effectiveness, or complications between patients treated with postoperative bracing and patients not receiving any postoperative bracing. Each article was critically appraised independently by two reviewers, and the overall body of evidence was rated using guidelines outlined by the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. RESULTS: Of the 858 retrieved citations, 5 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review, consisting of 4 randomized controlled trials and 1 prospective cohort study. Low to moderate evidence suggests that there are no significant differences in most measures of disability, pain, quality of life, functional impairment, radiographic outcomes, and safety between groups. Isolated studies reported statistically significant and inconsistent differences between groups with respect to Neck Disability Index at 6 weeks postoperatively or Short Form-36 Physical Component Score at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on limited evidence, postoperative bracing does not result in improved outcomes after spinal surgery. Future high-quality randomized trials will be required to confirm these findings.


Subject(s)
Braces/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spine/surgery , Braces/economics , Humans , Quality of Life , Spinal Fusion/methods
6.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 81(5): 897-904, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27602907

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma conditionally recommend cervical collar removal after a negative cervical computed tomography in obtunded adult blunt trauma patients. Although the rates of missed injury are extremely low, the impact of chronic care costs and litigation upon decision making remains unclear. We hypothesize that the cost-effectiveness of strategies that include additional imaging may contradict current guidelines. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed for a base-case 40-year-old, obtunded man with a negative computed tomography. Strategies compared included adjunct imaging with cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), collar maintenance for 6 weeks, or removal. Data on the probability for long-term collar complications, spine injury, imaging costs, complications associated with MRI, acute and chronic care, and litigation were obtained from published and Medicare data. Outcomes were expressed as 2014 US dollars and quality-adjusted life-years. RESULTS: Collar removal was more effective and less costly than collar use or MRI (19.99 vs. 19.35 vs. 18.70 quality-adjusted life-years; $675,359 vs. $685,546 vs. $685,848) in the base-case analysis. When the probability of missed cervical injury was greater than 0.04 adjunct imaging with MRI dominated, however, collar removal remained cost-effective until the probability of missed injury exceeded 0.113 at which point collar removal exceeded the $50,000 threshold. Collar removal remained the most cost-effective approach until the probability of complications from collar use was reduced to less than 0.009, at which point collar maintenance became the most cost-effective strategy. Early collar removal dominates all strategies until the risk of complications from MRI positioning is reduced to 0.03 and remained cost-effective even when the probability of complication was reduced to 0. CONCLUSION: Early collar removal in obtunded adult blunt trauma patients appears to be the most effective and least costly strategy for cervical clearance based on the current literature available. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic evaluation, level III; therapeutic study, level IV.


Subject(s)
Braces/economics , Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Spinal Injuries/therapy , Adult , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Consciousness Disorders , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diagnostic Errors , Hospital Costs , Humans , Long-Term Care/economics , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/adverse effects , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Male , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Neck Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Neck Injuries/therapy , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Spinal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/economics , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/diagnostic imaging , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/economics , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy
7.
J Clin Nurs ; 25(9-10): 1435-43, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27079974

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To examine the cost-effectiveness of semi-rigid ankle brace to facilitate return to work following first-time acute ankle sprains. DESIGN: Economic evaluation based on cost-utility analysis. BACKGROUND: Ankle sprains are a source of morbidity and absenteeism from work, accounting for 15-20% of all sports injuries. Semi-rigid ankle brace and taping are functional treatment interventions used by Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists and Nurses to facilitate return to work following acute ankle sprains. METHODS: A decision model analysis, based on cost-utility analysis from the perspective of National Health Service was used. The primary outcomes measure was incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, based on quality-adjusted life years. Costs and quality of life data were derived from published literature, while model clinical probabilities were sourced from Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists. RESULTS: The cost and quality adjusted life years gained using semi-rigid ankle brace was £184 and 0.72 respectively. However, the cost and quality adjusted life years gained following taping was £155 and 0.61 respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the semi-rigid brace was £263 per quality adjusted life year. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that ankle brace provided the highest net-benefit, hence the preferred option. CONCLUSION: Taping is a cheaper intervention compared with ankle brace to facilitate return to work following first-time ankle sprains. However, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio observed for ankle brace was less than the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence threshold and the intervention had a higher net-benefit, suggesting that it is a cost-effective intervention. Decision-makers may be willing to pay £263 for an additional gain in quality adjusted life year. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings of this economic evaluation provide justification for the use of semi-rigid ankle brace by Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists and Nurses to facilitate return to work in individuals with first-time ankle sprains.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries/rehabilitation , Braces/economics , Ankle Injuries/nursing , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Trees , Humans , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Return to Work , State Medicine , United Kingdom
10.
West J Emerg Med ; 16(1): 114-20, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25671019

ABSTRACT

Traumatic dislocations of the shoulder commonly present to emergency departments (EDs). Immediate closed reduction of both anterior and posterior glenohumeral dislocations is recommended and is frequently performed in the ED. Recurrence of dislocation is common, as anteroinferior labral tears (Bankart lesions) are present in many anterior shoulder dislocations.14,15,18,23 Immobilization of the shoulder following closed reduction is therefore recommended; previous studies support the use of immobilization with the shoulder in a position of external rotation, for both anterior and posterior shoulder dislocations.7-11,19 In this study, we present a technique for assembling a low-cost external rotation shoulder brace using materials found in most hospitals: cotton roll, stockinette, and shoulder immobilizers. This brace is particularly suited for the uninsured patient, who lacks the financial resources to pay for a pre-fabricated brace out of pocket. We also performed a cost analysis for our low-cost external rotation shoulder brace, and a cost comparison with pre-fabricated brand name braces. At our institution, the total materials cost for our brace was $19.15. The cost of a pre-fabricated shoulder brace at our institution is $150 with markup, which is reimbursed on average at $50.40 according to our hospital billing data. The low-cost external rotation shoulder brace is therefore a more affordable option for the uninsured patient presenting with acute shoulder dislocation.


Subject(s)
Braces/economics , Immobilization/instrumentation , Shoulder Dislocation/therapy , Humans , Immobilization/methods , Manipulation, Orthopedic , Michigan , Rotation , Shoulder Dislocation/economics
11.
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil ; 17(5): 463-70, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26751746

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study is to evaluate the ability of a pre- fabricated humeral bracing system in providing sufficient stability to fracture union and carry out a cost analysis comparing bracing versus surgical fixation for these fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A review of humeral shaft fractures treated with a pre-fabricated humeral bracing system was undertaken. RESULTS: 20 humeral fractures (20 patients) were included. Mean patient age was 56.8 years (range 16- 89). There were 14 AO type A, 3 type B and 3 type C fractures. Median time interval from fracture to brace application was 8 days (range 0-41). Clinical and radiological union was achieved in 15 humeri (75%). Median time to clinical and radiological union was 80 days (range 32-434). The cost of treating humeral shaft fractures surgically by plating and by humeral bracing was estimated at £ 2292.99 and £ 1228 per case, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 1. A pre-fabricated bracing system is an efficacious and cost-effective modality for humeral shaft fracture treatment. 2. It may, however, lead to a high non-union rate as well as shoulder and elbow stiffness. 3. A prospective randomized trial comparing bracing with internal fixation of humeral shaft fractures is needed.


Subject(s)
Braces/economics , Fracture Fixation/economics , Fracture Fixation/instrumentation , Fracture Healing/physiology , Humeral Fractures/economics , Humeral Fractures/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Fracture Fixation/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom , Young Adult
12.
World J Surg ; 38(9): 2217-22, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24711155

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clubfoot is disabling, with an incidence of 0.9/1,000 live births to 7/1,000 live births. It affects mobility, productivity, and quality of life. Patients are treated surgically or non-surgically using the Ponseti method. We estimated the cost per patient treated with both methods and the cost-effectiveness of these methods in Pakistan. METHODS: Parents of patients treated, either surgically or with the Ponseti method, at the Indus Hospital's free program for clubfoot were interviewed between February and May 2012. We measured the direct and indirect household expenditures for pre-diagnosis, incomplete treatment, and current treatment until the first brace for Ponseti method and the first corrective surgery for surgically treated patients. Hospital expenditure was measured by existing accounts. RESULTS: Average per-patient cost was $349 for the Ponseti method and $810 for patients treated surgically. Of these, the Indus hospital costs were $170 the for Ponseti method and $452 for surgically treated patients. The direct household expenditure was $154 and $314 for the Ponseti and surgical methods, respectively. The majority of the costs were incurred pre-diagnosis and after inadequate treatment, with the largest proportion spent on transportation, material, and fee for service. The Ponseti method is shown to be the dominant method of treatment, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1,225. CONCLUSIONS: The Ponseti method is clearly the treatment of choice in resource-constrained settings like Pakistan. Household costs for clubfoot treatment are substantial, even in programs offering free diagnostics and treatments and may be a barrier to service utilization for the poorest patients.


Subject(s)
Clubfoot/therapy , Manipulation, Orthopedic/economics , Manipulation, Orthopedic/methods , Orthopedic Procedures/economics , Braces/economics , Casts, Surgical/economics , Child, Preschool , Clubfoot/diagnosis , Clubfoot/surgery , Cost of Illness , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospital Costs , Humans , Infant , Male , Pakistan , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome
13.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 65(8): 870-6, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22609138

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The results of two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) demonstrate the clinical effectiveness of alternatives to casting for certain ankle and wrist fractures. We illustrate the use of value of information (VOI) methods for evaluating the evidence provided by these studies with respect to decision making. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Using cost-effectiveness data from these studies, the expected value of sample information (EVSI) of a future RCT can be determined. If the EVSI exceeds the cost of the future trial for any sample size, then the current evidence is considered insufficient for decision making and a future trial is considered worthwhile. If, on the other hand, there is no sample size for which the EVSI exceeds the cost, then the evidence is considered sufficient, and no future trial is required. RESULTS: We found that the evidence from the ankle study was insufficient to support the adoption of the removable device and determined the optimal sample size for a future trial. Conversely, the evidence from the wrist study was sufficient to support the adoption of the removable device. CONCLUSIONS: VOI methods provide a decision-analytic alternative to the standard hypothesis testing approach for assessing the evidence provided by cost-effectiveness studies and for determining sample sizes for RCTs.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Research Design , Ankle Injuries/economics , Ankle Injuries/therapy , Braces/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/economics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Sample Size , Wrist Injuries/economics , Wrist Injuries/therapy
14.
Iowa Orthop J ; 30: 1-6, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21045964

ABSTRACT

In 2005, a nationwide clubfoot treatment program focused on the Ponseti method -an effective, affordable and minimally-invasive method- was initiated in China. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and identify barriers to the program. A qualitative study (rapid ethnographic study) was conducted using semi-structured interviews of 44 physicians who attended four of the 10 Ponseti training workshops, focus groups with parents of children with clubfoot, and observation. Several barriers to the Ponseti method are quite unique due to China's size, socio-economics, culture, politics, and healthcare systems. The barriers were classified into seven themes: (i) physician education, (ii) caregiver compliance, (iii) culture, (iv) public awareness, (v) poverty, (vi) financial constraints for physicians/hospitals, and (vii) challenges of the treatment process. A number of suggestions that could be helpful in reducing or eliminating the effects of these barriers were also identified: (i) pamphlets explaining clubfoot and treatment for caregivers, (ii) directories of Ponseti providers, (iii) funding/financial support, and (iv) improving public awareness. The information from this study provides healthcare planners with knowledge to assist in meeting the needs of the population and continued implementation of effective and culturally appropriate awareness and treatment programs for clubfoot throughout China.


Subject(s)
Achilles Tendon/surgery , Braces/trends , Clubfoot/ethnology , Clubfoot/therapy , Tenotomy/trends , Awareness , Braces/economics , Braces/statistics & numerical data , Caregivers/psychology , China/epidemiology , Clubfoot/epidemiology , Culture , Data Collection , Education, Medical , Humans , Malawi , Patient Compliance/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors , Tenotomy/economics , Tenotomy/statistics & numerical data , Uganda
15.
Iowa Orthop J ; 30: 7-14, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21045965

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Congenital clubfoot treatment continues to be controversial particularly in a resource-constrained country. Comparative evaluation of clubfoot surgery with Ponseti methods has not been reported in West Africa. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of Ponseti techniques on clubfoot surgery frequency and patterns in Nigeria. METHODS: This was a prospective hospital-based intention-to-treat comparative study of clubfoot managed with Ponseti methods (PCG) and extensive soft tissue surgery (NPCG). The first step was a nonselective double-blind randomization of clubfoot patients into two groups using Excel software in a university teaching hospital setting. The control group was the NPCG patients. The patients' parents gave informed consent, and the medical research and ethics board approved the study protocol. Biodata was gathered, clubfoot patterns were analyzed, Dimeglio-Bensahel scoring was done, the number of casts applied was tallied, and patterns of surgeries were documented. The cost of care, recurrence and outcomes were evaluated. Kruskal-Wallis analysis and Mann-Whitney U technique were used, and an alpha error of < 0.05 at a CI of 95% were taken to be significant. RESULTS: We randomized 153 clubfeet (in 105 clubfoot patients) into two treatment groups. Fifty NPCG patients (36.2%) underwent manipulation and extensive soft tissue surgery and 55 PCG patients (39.9%) were treated with Ponseti methods. Fifty-two patients of the Ponseti group had no form of surgery (94.5% vs. 32%, p<0.000). Extensive soft tissue surgery was indicated in 17 (34.0%) of the NPCG group, representing 8.9% of the total of 191 major orthopaedic surgeries within the study period. Thirty-five patients (70.0%) from the NPCG group required more than six casts compared to thirteen patients (23.6%) of the PCG (p<0.000). The mean care cost was high within the NPCG when compared to the Ponseti group (48% vs. 14.5%, p<0.000). The Ponseti-treated group had fewer treatment complications (p<0.003), a lower recurrence rate (p<0.000) and satisfactory early outcome (p<0.000). CONCLUSION: Major clubfoot surgery was not commonly indicated among patients treated with the Ponseti method. The Ponseti clubfoot technique has reduced total care costs, cast utilization, clubfoot surgery frequency and has also changed the patterns of surgery performed for clubfoot in Nigeria.


Subject(s)
Achilles Tendon/surgery , Braces/trends , Clubfoot/ethnology , Clubfoot/therapy , Tenotomy/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Braces/economics , Braces/statistics & numerical data , Casts, Surgical/economics , Casts, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Casts, Surgical/trends , Child , Child, Preschool , Clubfoot/epidemiology , Double-Blind Method , Health Care Costs/trends , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Nigeria/epidemiology , Orthopedic Procedures/economics , Orthopedic Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Orthopedic Procedures/trends , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Prospective Studies , Tenotomy/economics , Tenotomy/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
16.
Iowa Orthop J ; 30: 15-23, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21045966

ABSTRACT

Bracing is a critical component of the current standard of treatment for clubfoot. Adherence to the bracing protocol is the main factor for the long-term success of the treatment The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of clubfoot braces, best practices in brace design and recommendations for bracing in order to improve adherence with the bracing phase of the clubfoot treatment. There are a number of designs and offerings of braces available in various regions of the world. Although many new brace designs are being proposed and developed, evidence in the literature regarding biomechanical effects, clinical outcomes, functionality and patient adherence is limited. The current research that is available regarding brace design focuses on increasing patient comfort and satisfaction to improve adherence. Although the currently available braces are widely distributed in developed countries, access is limited to many parts of the world. When considering the future of the clubfoot treatment and prevention of relapses, since 80% of the cases are in developing countries with limited resources, brace cost and availability needs to be assessed.


Subject(s)
Braces/trends , Clubfoot/therapy , Biomechanical Phenomena , Braces/economics , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Male , Patient Compliance , Treatment Outcome
17.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 468(7): 1926-32, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20177839

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is controversial evidence regarding whether foot orthoses or knee braces improve pain and function or correct malalignment in selected patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the medial knee compartment. However, insoles are safe and less costly than knee bracing if they relieve pain or improve function. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore asked whether laterally wedged insoles or valgus braces would reduce pain, enhance functional scores, and correct varus malalignment comparable to knee braces. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 91 patients with symptomatic medial compartmental knee OA and randomized to treatment with either a 10-mm laterally wedged insole (index group, n = 45) or a valgus brace (control group, n = 46). All patients were assessed at 6 months. The primary outcome measure was pain severity as measured on a visual analog scale. Secondary outcome measures were knee function score using WOMAC and correction of varus alignment on AP whole-leg radiographs taken with the patient in the standing position. Additionally, we compared the percentage of responders according to the OMERACT-OARSI criteria for both groups. RESULTS: We observed no differences in pain or WOMAC scores between the two groups. Neither device achieved correction of knee varus malalignment in the frontal plane. According to the OMERACT-OARSI criteria, 17% of our patients responded to the allocated intervention. Patients in the insole group complied better with their intervention. Although subgroup analysis results should be translated into practice cautiously, we observed a slightly higher percentage of responders for the insole compared with bracing for patients with mild medial OA. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest a laterally wedged insole may be an alternative to valgus bracing for noninvasively treating symptoms of medial knee OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of level of evidence.


Subject(s)
Bone Malalignment/therapy , Braces , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Pain Management , Bone Malalignment/complications , Bone Malalignment/pathology , Braces/economics , Equipment Design , Female , Health Status , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Knee Joint/pathology , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/complications , Osteoarthritis, Knee/pathology , Pain/etiology , Pain/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Radiography , Recovery of Function , Severity of Illness Index , Shoes , Treatment Outcome
18.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 25(4): 226-30, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19382319

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Fractures in children may not be visible in the result of initial radiography, and undertreatment and overtreatment of such fractures routinely occur. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential cost of implementing limited magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at initial encounter, when radiographs are unrevealing. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 204 emergency department pediatric patients presenting between January 1, 2005 and February 28, 2006 with appendicular trauma, with initially negative radiographic result and follow-up. Emergency department treatment categorization of (1) no treatment, (2) ACE wrap, (3) brace, (4) splint, or (5) casting was evaluated. Final determination of presence or absence of fracture was based on follow-up. Patients with fractures were considered undertreated when they received categories 1 to 3 care; patients without fractures were considered overtreated when they received categories 4 and 5 care. The percentage of patients undertreated or overtreated and direct and total costs were determined and analyzed in conjunction with the cost of a limited MRI at initial encounter. Total costs include direct and indirect costs (lost wages for each day off work for the parent). Cost estimates assume patients determined to be without fractures at follow-up will not return for follow-up clinical care or obtain additional imaging after MRI at initial encounter. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (13.7%) of the 204 patients had fractures at follow-up. Fifty one percent of patients without fractures were overtreated; 29% with fractures were undertreated. Mean direct cost for all patients and cost estimation with limited MRI protocol were $843.81 and $891.79, respectively (P = 0.365). However, mean total cost for all patients and cost estimation with limited MRI protocol was $1059.49 and $929.10, respectively (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Based on clinical grounds and initially negative radiographic results, slightly more than half of patients without fractures can be overtreated, and nearly one third of patients with fractures can be undertreated. Instituting a protocol that includes limited trauma MRI lowers the total cost of care without increasing direct cost, and appropriate care may be instituted at the outset.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Closed/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/economics , Adolescent , Bandages/economics , Braces/economics , Case Management , Casts, Surgical/economics , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost of Illness , Costs and Cost Analysis , Diagnostic Errors , Direct Service Costs , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fractures, Closed/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Closed/economics , Fractures, Closed/therapy , Health Care Costs , Humans , Infant , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Splints/economics , Unnecessary Procedures/economics
19.
Health Technol Assess ; 13(13): iii, ix-x, 1-121, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19232157

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three methods of ankle support compared with double layer tubular compression bandage. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial, designed to reflect practice in UK hospital emergency departments. SETTING: Eight emergency departments in England. PARTICIPANTS: Aged 16 or over with acute severe ankle sprain, unable to weight bear, no fracture. INTERVENTIONS: 584 participants were randomised to one of four treatment arms: tubular bandage, below knee cast, Aircast ankle brace or Bledsoe boot, all applied 2-3 days after presentation to allow swelling to resolve. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response to treatment was assessed using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score and generic measures (Functional Limitations Profile, SF-12 and EQ-5D). RESULTS: When adjusted for age, sex and baseline scores, the below knee cast offered a small but statistically significant benefit at 4 weeks in terms of pain (FAOS pain difference 5.1; 95% CI 0.4-9.8), foot- and ankle-related quality of life (QoL) (FAOS QoL difference 5.9; 95% CI 0.1-11.8) and the physical component of the SF-12 (SF-12 score difference 2.2; 95% CI 0.0-4.4). Neither the Aircast brace nor the Bledsoe boot was statistically or clinically better. At 12 weeks the below knee cast was significantly better than tubular bandage in terms of pain (FAOS pain difference 5.1; 95% CI 0.3-10.0), activities of daily living (FAOS ADL difference 3.5; 95% CI 0.4-6.6), sports (FAOS sports difference 8.7; 95% CI 1.6-15.7) and QoL (FAOS QoL difference 8.7; 95% CI 2.4-15.0), and the Aircast brace was better only in terms of ankle-related QoL and mental health. The Bledsoe boot conferred no significant advantage over tubular bandage. By 9 months there were no significant differences. Based on mean direct health-care costs per participant, the Bledsoe boot was the most expensive (215 pounds) and tubular bandage the least so (1 pound 44 pence). Inclusion of indirect costs (sick leave) raised overall costs substantially and removed any significant differences between the therapies. Cost-utility analysis demonstrated that the Aircast brace [301 pounds per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY)] and below knee cast (339 pounds per QALY) were more cost-effective than the Bledsoe boot (2116 pounds per QALY). However, inclusion of indirect costs produced different rank orders, depending on the assumptions made, and results should be treated with caution. CONCLUSIONS: The below knee cast and the Aircast brace offered cost-effective alternatives to tubular bandage for acute severe ankle sprain, the former having the advantage in terms of overall recovery at 3 months. As there were no differences in long-term outcome, practitioners should consider likely compliance and acceptability to patients when choosing a brace.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries/therapy , Bandages/economics , Braces/economics , Casts, Surgical/economics , Restraint, Physical/instrumentation , Sprains and Strains/therapy , Activities of Daily Living , Adolescent , Adult , Ankle Injuries/economics , Ankle Injuries/physiopathology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Physical Therapy Modalities/economics , Recovery of Function , Restraint, Physical/methods , Sprains and Strains/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Technology Assessment, Biomedical , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
20.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 34(3): 215-20, 2009 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19179915

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Multicentric, randomized, and controlled study of clinical evaluation of medical device in subacute low back pain. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of an elastic lumbar belt on functional capacity, pain intensity in low back pain treatment, and the benefice on medical cost. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is limited evidence of efficiency of lumbar supports for treatment of low back pain. There is also a lack of the methodology in the studies reported on the efficiency of this device. METHODS: This study is randomized, multicentric, and controlled with 2 groups: a patient group treated with a lumbar belt (BWG) and a control group (CG). The main criteria of clinical evaluation were the physical restoration assessed with the EIFEL scale, the pain assessed by a visual analogic scale, the main economical criteria was the overall cost of associated medical treatments. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-seven patients have participated. The results show a higher decrease in EIFEL score in BWG than CG between days 0 and 90 (7.6 +/- 4.4 vs. de 6.1 +/- 4.7;P = 0.023). Respectively significant reduction in visual analogic scale was also noticed (41.5 +/- 21.4 vs. 32.0 +/- 20; P = 0.002). Pharmacologic consumption decreased at D90 (the proportion of patients who did not take any medication in BWG is 60.8% vs. 40% in CG;P = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Lumbar belt wearing is consequent in subacute low back pain to improve significantly the functional status, the pain level, and the pharmacologic consumption. This study may be useful to underline the interest of lumbar support as a complementary and nonpharmacologic treatment beside the classic medication use in low back pain treatment.


Subject(s)
Braces , Low Back Pain/rehabilitation , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology , Lumbosacral Region/physiopathology , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Braces/economics , Braces/standards , Braces/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Low Back Pain/economics , Low Back Pain/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Pain Measurement , Recovery of Function/physiology , Self-Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...