Current and Emerging Therapeutics in Hereditary Angioedema.

Angioedema is characterized by transient movement of fluid from the vasculature into the interstitial space leading to subcutaneous or submucosal non-pitting edema. Current evidence suggests that most angioedema conditions can be grouped into 2 categories: mast cell-mediated (previously termed histaminergic) or bradykinin-mediated angioedema. Although effective therapies for mast cell-mediated angioedema have existed for decades, specific therapies for bradykinin-mediated angioedema have more recently been developed. In recent years, rigorous studies of these therapies in treating hereditary angioedema (HAE) have led to regulatory approvals of medication for HAE management thereby greatly expanding HAE treatment options.

Analgesic and Psychotropic Effects of a New Bradykinin Antagonist.

A bradykinin B1 receptors antagonist PAV-0056, an 1,4-benzodiazepin-2-one derivative, intragastrically administrated to mice at doses of 0.1 and 1 mg/kg causes analgesia in the "formalin test" not inferior to that of diclofenac sodium (10 mg/kg) and tramadol (20 mg/kg). PAV-0056 at doses of 0.1 and 10 mg/kg has no anxiolytic and central muscle relaxant effects in mice and does not damage the gastric mucosa in rats. Based on the results of the conditioned place preference test, PAV-0056 also does not induce addiction in mice.

An Overview of Hereditary Angioedema for the Primary Care Physician.

Hereditary angioedema is a rare autosomal dominant condition characterized by episodes of swelling of the upper airway, intestines, and skin. The disorder is characterized by deficiency in C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) or a decrease in functional C1-INH. Treatment options include on demand therapy (treatment of acute attacks), long-term prophylaxis, and short-term prophylaxis. Corticosteroids, epinephrine, and antihistamines are not effective for this form of angioedema. The high mortality in patients undiagnosed underscores a need for broader physician awareness to identify these patients and initiate therapy.

Interaction of Angiotensin-(1-7) with kinins in the kidney circulation: Role of B1 receptors.

Changes in renal hemodynamics impact renal function during physiological and pathological conditions. In this context, renal vascular resistance (RVR) is regulated by components of the Renin-Angiotensin System (RAS) and the Kallikrein-Kinin System (KKS). However, the interaction between these vasoactive peptides on RVR is still poorly understood. Here, we studied the crosstalk between angiotensin-(1-7) and kinins on RVR. The right kidneys of Wistar rats were isolated and perfused in a closed-circuit system. The perfusion pressure and renal perfusate flow were continuously monitored. Ang-(1-7) (1.0-25.0 nM) caused a sustained, dose-dependent reduction of relative RVR (rRVR). This phenomenon was sensitive to 10 nM A-779, a specific Mas receptor (MasR) antagonist. Bradykinin (BK) promoted a sustained and transient reduction in rRVR at 1.25 nM and 125 nM, respectively. The transient effect was abolished by 4 µM des-Arg9-Leu8-bradykinin (DALBK), a specific kinin B1 receptor (B1R) antagonist. Accordingly, des-Arg9-bradykinin (DABK) 1 µM (a B1R agonist) increased rRVR. Interestingly, pre-perfusion of Ang-(1-7) changed the sustained reduction of rRVR triggered by 1.25 nM BK into a transient effect. On the other hand, pre-perfusion of Ang-(1-7) primed and potentiated the DABK response, this mechanism being sensitive to A-779 and DALBK. Binding studies performed with CHO cells stably transfected with MasR, B1R, and kinin B2 receptor (B2R) showed no direct interaction between Ang-(1-7) with B1R or B2R. In conclusion, our findings suggest that Ang-(1-7) differentially modulates kinin's effect on RVR in isolated rat kidneys. These results help to expand the current knowledge regarding the crosstalk between the RAS and KKS complex network in RVR.

The future of therapeutic options for hereditary angioedema.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic condition causing unpredictable and severe episodes of angioedema that are debilitating and life-threatening. Moreover, HAE can be classified into HAE due to C1-esterase inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH) or HAE with normal C1INH. Moreover, HAE-C1INH is subcategorized as types I and II based on deficient or dysfunctional circulating C1INH protein resulting from inherited or spontaneous mutations in the SERPING1 gene leading to uncontrolled factor XII/plasma kallikrein activation and excessive bradykinin production. Bradykinin-2 receptor activation leads to vasodilation, increased vascular permeability, and smooth muscle contractions, resulting in subcutaneous or submucosal fluid extravasation that can affect the face, extremities, airway, and gastrointestinal and genitourinary systems. Furthermore, HAE with normal C1INH is caused by either a known or unknown genetic mutation, and the mechanisms are less well-established but most forms are thought to be related to bradykinin signaling with a similar presentation as HAE-C1INH despite normal levels of C1INH protein and function. Current HAE management strategies include on-demand and prophylactic treatments which replace C1INH, reduce kallikrein activity, or block bradykinin binding to the bradykinin B2 receptor. With the advent of additional small molecule inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, RNA-targeted therapies, gene therapies, and gene modification approaches, preclinical studies and human clinical trials are underway to further expand therapeutic options in HAE. This review article will briefly summarize current HAE treatments and provide an overview of potential future therapies for HAE.

Deucrictibant for angioedema due to acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency: A randomized-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Angioedema due to acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency is a very rare but serious disease, with an estimated prevalence of 1 per 500,000 persons. There are no approved therapies to treat or prevent angioedema swelling in patients with this condition. Deucrictibant is a specific, orally bioavailable, competitive antagonist of the bradykinin B2 receptor currently under investigation for hereditary angioedema. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of deucrictibant as acute and prophylactic treatment for angioedema due to acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency. METHODS: A 2-part, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study was conducted. In Part 1, 4 consecutive angioedema attacks were treated with 3 doses of deucrictibant (10 mg, 20 mg, and 30 mg) or placebo. In Part 2, deucricibant, 20 mg, or placebo was administered twice daily for 2 treatment periods of 8 weeks. RESULTS: Three patients were enrolled; of those 3 patients, 1 completed both study parts and 2 completed only Part 2. In Part 1, a reduction in attack severity was observed in the 3 attacks treated with deucrictibant as opposed to an increase in severity of the attack treated with placebo. In Part 2, the individual mean monthly attack rates were 2.0, 0.6, and 1.0 during the placebo period and 0.0 across all patients during treatment with deucrictibant. There were no severe adverse events and 1 self-limiting treatment-emergent adverse event (abdominal pain). CONCLUSIONS: Deucrictibant has the potential to effectively and safely treat and prevent angioedema attacks due to acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency.

Maximakinin reversed H2O2 induced oxidative damage in rat cardiac H9c2 cells through AMPK/Akt and AMPK/ERK1/2 signaling pathways.

Maximakinin (MK), a homolog of bradykinin (BK), is extracted from skin venom of the Chinese toad Bombina maxima. Although MK has a good antihypertensive effect, its effect on myocardial cells is unclear. This study investigates the protective effect of MK on hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-induced oxidative damage in rat cardiac H9c2 cells and explores its mechanism of action. A 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-2-Thiazolyl)-2,5-Diphenyl Tetrazolium Bromide (MTT) assay was selected to detect the effect of MK on H9c2 cell viability, while flow cytometry was used to investigate the influence of MK and H2O2 on intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. Protein expression changes were detected by western blot. In addition, specific protein inhibitors were applied to confirm the induction of ROS-related signaling pathways by MK. MTT assay results show that MK significantly reversed H2O2-induced cell growth inhibition. Flow cytometry Dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) staining shows that MK significantly reversed H2O2-induced increases in intracellular ROS production in H9c2 cells. Moreover, the addition of specific protein inhibitors suggests that MK reverses H2O2-induced oxidative damage by activating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)/protein kinase B (Akt) and AMPK/extracellular-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) pathways. Finally, an inhibitor of bradykinin B2 receptors (B2Rs), HOE-140, was applied to investigate potential targets of MK in H9c2 cells. HOE-140 significantly blocked induction of AMPK/Akt and AMPK/ERK1/2 pathways by MK, suggesting a potentially important role for B2Rs in MK reversing H2O2-induced oxidative damage. Above all, MK protects against oxidative damage by inhibiting H2O2-induced ROS production in H9c2 cells. The protective mechanism of MK may be achieved by activation of B2Rs to activate downstream AMPK/Akt and AMPK/ERK1/2 pathways.

Icatibant averting mechanical ventilation in acute ischemic stroke patient with alteplase-induced orolingual angioedema.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Orolingual angioedema (OA) represents a rare but life-threatening complication among patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase. Novel agents, including icatibant, are recommended in resistant patients with alteplase-induced OA who have failed to respond to first-line therapies including corticosteroids, antihistamines, and/or adrenaline. METHODS: We present a patient with alteplase-induced OA who showed substantial clinical improvement following the administration of icatibant. RESULTS: We describe a 71-year-old woman with known arterial hypertension under treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, who presented with acute ischemic stroke in the territory of the right middle cerebral artery and received intravenous alteplase. During intravenous thrombolysis, the case was complicated with OA without any response to standard anaphylactic treatment including corticosteroids, dimetindene, and adrenaline. Thirty minutes after symptom onset, icatibant, a synthetic selective bradykinin B2-receptor antagonist, was administered subcutaneously. Substantial symptomatic resolution was observed only following the icatibant administration. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the effectiveness of icatibant in the acute management of alteplase-induced OA. In particular, icatibant administration, following first-line therapies including corticosteroids, antihistamines, and/or adrenaline, may avert tracheostomy and intubation in resistant and refractory cases with OA following intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.

Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of icatibant treatment in Japanese pediatric patients with hereditary angioedema: A phase 3, open-label study.

We evaluated the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous weight-adjusted icatibant for the treatment of acute hereditary angioedema attacks in Japanese pediatric patients. Two patients (aged 10-13 and 6-9 years) received icatibant for a total of four attacks. Each attack was abdominal and/or cutaneous and was treated with a single icatibant injection. Mild or moderate injection-site reactions were the only adverse events reported. Time to onset of symptom relief was 0.9-1.0 h. Icatibant was rapidly absorbed, with a pharmacokinetic profile consistent with previous studies. Simulated exposure levels were consistent with non-Japanese pediatric patients. These results support the safety and efficacy of icatibant in Japanese pediatric patients.

Bradykinin and Neurotensin Analogues as Potential Compounds in Colon Cancer Therapy.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide, so the attempts to find novel therapeutic approaches are necessary. The aim of our study was to analyze how chemical modifications influence physical, chemical, and biological properties of the two peptides, namely, bradykinin (BK) and neurotensin (NT). For this purpose, we used fourteen modified peptides, and their anti-cancers features were analyzed on the HCT116 CRC cell line. Our results confirmed that the spherical mode of a CRC cell line culture better reflects the natural tumour microenvironment. We observed that the size of the colonospheres was markedly reduced following treatment with some BK and NT analogues. The proportion of CD133+ cancer stem cells (CSCs) in colonospheres decreased following incubation with the aforementioned peptides. In our research, we found two groups of these peptides. The first group influenced all the analyzed cellular features, while the second seemed to include the most promising peptides that lowered the count of CD133+ CSCs with parallel substantial reduction in CRC cells viability. These analogues need further analysis to uncover their overall anti-cancer potential.

Effect of ornithokinin on feeding behavior, cloacal temperature, voluntary activity and crop emptying rate in chicks.

Bradykinin is a well-studied bioactive peptide associated with several physiological functions, including vasodilation and inflammation, in mammals. However, its avian homolog, ornithokinin, has received less research attention in birds. Therefore this study aimed to investigate the effect of intraperitoneal (IP) and intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of ornithokinin on feeding behavior, cloacal temperature, voluntary activity, crop emptying rate, and blood constituents in chicks (Gallus gallus). We also investigated the effect of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a cell wall component of gram-negative bacteria, on ornithokinin-associated gene expression was also investigated to determine whether activation of the ornithokinin system is induced by bacterial infection. Both IP and ICV injections of ornithokinin significantly decreased feed intake, cloacal temperature, voluntary activity, and crop emptying rate in chicks, but they did not affect the plasma concentration of corticosterone. Additionally, LPS significantly increased the expression of ornithokinin B2 receptor mRNA in several organs. Hence, ornithokinin is associated with a range of physiological responses in chicks and may be related to their response to bacterial infection.

Is Icatibant Safe for the Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema During Pregnancy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a disorder affecting bradykinin regulation presenting as recurrent cutaneous or mucosal swelling. Treatment options include plasma-derived or human-recombinant C1-inhibitor, icatibant, or ecallantide. Due to the lack of knowledge and experience on the topic, the treatment of choice in pregnancy is plasma-derived C1-inhibitor, and reporting any new experience is recommended. This review presents current guidelines for HAE treatment with a focus on pregnancy and reviews all experience with icatibant use during pregnancy. RECENT FINDINGS: Our experience of treating a pregnant nC1-INH HAE patient with icatibant is presented, with no adverse effects or abnormalities, to add to the growing knowledge of icatibant use during pregnancy. Considering the limited number of attacks that our patient usually experiences, which continued at more or less the same frequency during pregnancy, we feel icatibant to be a safe choice for on-demand HAE treatment during pregnancy for such cases.

The Icatibant Outcome Survey: 10 years of experience with icatibant for patients with hereditary angioedema.

In patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE), bradykinin causes swelling episodes by activating bradykinin B2 receptors. Icatibant, a selective bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist, is approved for on-demand treatment of HAE attacks. The Icatibant Outcome Survey (IOS; NCT01034969) is an ongoing observational registry initiated in 2009 to monitor the effectiveness/safety of icatibant in routine clinical practice. As of March 2019, 549 patients with HAE type 1 or 2 from the IOS registry had been treated of 5995 total attacks. This article reviews data published from IOS over time which have demonstrated that the effectiveness of icatibant in a real-world setting is comparable to efficacy in clinical trials; one dose is effective for the majority of attacks; early treatment (facilitated by self-administration) leads to faster resolution and shorter attack duration; effectiveness/safety of icatibant has been shown across a broad range of patient subgroups, including children/adolescents and patients with HAE with normal C1 inhibitor levels; and tolerability has been demonstrated in patients aged ≥65 years. Additionally, this review highlights how IOS data have provided valuable insights into patients' diagnostic journeys and treatment behaviours across individual countries. Such findings have helped to inform clinical strategies and guidelines to optimise HAE management and limit disease burden. This research was sponsored by Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., provided funding to Excel Medical Affairs for support in writing and editing this manuscript.

Icatibant use in Brazilian patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) type 1 or 2 and HAE with normal C1-INH levels: findings from the Icatibant Outcome Survey Registry Study.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema can be caused by C1-Inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency and/or dysfunction (HAE-1/2) or can occur in patients with normal C1-INH (HAE nC1-INH). METHODS: The Icatibant Outcome Survey (IOS; NCT01034969) registry monitors the safety and effectiveness of icatibant for treating acute angioedema. OBJECTIVE: Present findings from Brazilian patients with HAE-1/2 and HAE nC1-INH participating in IOS. RESULTS: 42 patients were enrolled (HAE-1/2, n = 26; HAE nC1-INH, n = 16). Median age at symptom onset was significantly lower with HAE-1/2 vs. HAE nC1-INH (10.0 vs. 16.5y, respectively; p = 0.0105), whereas median age at diagnosis (31.1 vs. 40.9y; p = 0.1276) and the median time between symptom onset and diagnosis (15.0 vs. 23.8y; p = 0.6680) were numerically lower vs. HAE nC1-INH, respectively. One icatibant dose was used for > 95% of HAE attacks. Median (range) time-to-event outcomes were shorter for patients with HAE nC1-INH vs. HAE-1/2, including time to first administration (0.5 [0-96.0] vs. 1.0 [0-94.0]h, respectively), time from first administration to complete resolution (1.0 [0-88.0] vs. 5.5 [0-96.0]h, respectively), and total attack duration (7.0 [0.3-99.0] vs. 18.5 [0.1-100.0]h, respectively). Mean (SD) time from attack onset to resolution was significantly shorter for patients with HAE nC1-INH vs. HAE-1/2 (9.8 [18.7] vs. 19.6 [24.0]h, respectively; p = 0.0174). 83 adverse events (AEs) in 42 patients were reported; most were mild (66.3%) or moderate (13.3%) and non-serious (75.9%). The most common icatibant-related AE was injection site erythema (HAE-1/2, 34.6%; HAE nC1-INH, 18.8%). STUDY LIMITATIONS: This was an observational study without a treatment comparator and that relied on patient recall. CONCLUSIONS: Findings demonstrate effectiveness and tolerability of icatibant in Brazilian HAE patients.

A multicenter, open-label, randomized, proof-of-concept phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of icatibant in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and admitted to hospital units without invasive mechanical ventilation: study protocol (ICAT-COVID).

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has quickly become a global pandemic with a substantial number of deaths and is a considerable burden for healthcare systems worldwide. Although most cases are paucisymptomatic and limited to the viral infection-related symptoms, some patients evolve to a second phase, with an impaired inflammatory response (cytokine storm) that may lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome and death. This is thought to be caused by increased bradykinin synthesis. METHODS: ICAT-COVID is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, proof-of-concept phase II clinical trial assessing the clinical efficacy and safety of adding icatibant to the standard of care in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 without invasive mechanical ventilation. Patients hospitalized with a confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia diagnosis (RT-PCR or antigen test ≤ 10 days prior to randomization, and radiographic evidence of pulmonary infiltrates), rated "4" or "5" on the WHO's clinical status scale, are eligible. Patients will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to either standard of care-plus-icatibant (experimental group) or to standard of care alone (control group). The experimental group will receive 30 mg of icatibant subcutaneously 3 times a day for 3 days (for a total of 9 doses). The expected sample size is 120 patients (60 per group) from 2 sites in Spain. Primary outcomes are the efficacy and safety of Icatibant. The main efficacy outcome is the number of patients reaching grades "2" or "1" on the WHO scale within 10 days of starting treatment. Secondary outcomes include "long-term efficacy": number of patients discharged who do not present COVID-19-related relapse or comorbidity up until 28 days after discharge, and mortality. DISCUSSION: Icatibant, a bradykinin type 2 receptor antagonist with proven effectiveness and safety against hereditary angioedema attacks, may be beneficial for COVID-19 patients by inhibiting bradykinin's action on endothelial cells and by inhibiting the SARS-CoV-2 M protease. Our working hypothesis is that treatment with standard of care-plus-icatibant is effective and safe to treat patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to hospital for pneumonia without invasive mechanical ventilation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2020-002166-13. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT04978051.

Tratamiento de la neumonía COVID-19 con acetato de icatibant: una vía de tratamiento inusual / Exceptional treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia with icatibant

No disponible

How satisfactory is on-demand icatibant from the patients' perspective in real life?

Background: Patients' satisfaction is important for the success of the management of chronic diseases. Objective: Our aim was to evaluate the satisfaction level of the patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) for icatibant treatment. Methods: Patients with HAE C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) were evaluated by using a questionnaire that included details of their icatibant-treated attacks. Patients' demographic and clinical features were collected from their medical records and personal attack diaries. The visual analog scale was used for determining the attack severity. Results: Of the total 161 patients with HAE C1-INH, 91% had HAE type I and were included in the study. Patients reported a median (interquartile range [IQR]) attacks of 2 (0.5-3) per month and 16 (4.5-36) attacks per year. The median (IQR) frequency of attacks treated with icatibant was 6 (0-20) per year. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) duration of treatment with icatibant was 3 ± 2.3 years. The self-administration rate was 91.3%. The mean ± SD time to administration and time to onset of symptom resolution were 1.6 ± 1.1 hours and 1.7 ± 1.3 hours, respectively. There was a correlation between the time to administration and time to onset of symptom resolution (r = 0.566; p < 0.0001). A total of 125 patients (77%) reported that they were very satisfied or satisfied with icatibant. No correlation was observed between the satisfaction level and the attack sites; however, the patients with more severe attacks were more satisfied with icatibant (p < 0.0001). A total of 52 patients reported 74 mild local reactions. Systemic reactions were not observed. Conclusion: The current real-life study showed that icatibant was safe and effective. Moreover, the patients' satisfaction level with icatibant was high. We believe that the availability of icatibant should be encouraged during HAE attacks because it enables patients to be more involved in their disease management.