Beyond the lungs: Exploring diverse applications of bromhexine and ambroxol.

The respiratory tract is commonly affected in multisystem disorders. Although many drugs have been developed to target various components of these diseases, there is still a need for effective treatments that can address both respiratory and non-respiratory symptoms. Bromhexine and ambroxol are mucolytic agents with a good safety profile that are widely used to treat respiratory conditions. These compounds seem to present several unresolved questions when carrying out their therapeutic effects, suggesting that they may not merely improve mucociliary clearance. These assumptions have provided the basis for researchers to investigate the specific characteristics of bromhexine and ambroxol. This has led to the emergence of several repositionings for this compound. Accordingly, these compounds have also shown potential benefits in the treatment of various extrapulmonary disorders, including neurological disorders, and inflammatory bowel disease. We gathered findings from relevant studies published in English between 1970 and December 2023 by searching databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Our findings revealed that most of the research on extrapulmonary uses has been conducted at the preclinical level. Accordingly, more clinical studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of bromhexine and ambroxol in these conditions. This article provides an overview of the potential extrapulmonary applications of bromhexine and ambroxol and discusses the potential advantages of using these drugs in multisystem disorders.

Evaluación de la eficacia de la N-acetilcisteína y la bromhexina en comparación con la atención estándar en la prevención de la hospitalización de pacientes ambulatorios con COVID-19: un ensayo clínico aleatorizado doble ciego / Evaluation of the efficacy of N-acetylcysteine and bromhexine compared with standard care in preventing hospitalization of outpatients with COVID-19: a double blind randomized clinical trial

Introducción y objetivo Desde su aparición en diciembre de 2019, la enfermedad por coronavirus causada por el síndrome respiratorio agudo severo coronavirus2 se ha convertido en una emergencia mundial, propagándose rápidamente por todo el mundo. En respuesta a la derivación temprana de estos pacientes a centros de salud ambulatorios, decidimos buscar tratamientos más eficaces en las primeras etapas de su derivación. Este estudio tiene como objetivo prevenir tanto la progresión como el deterioro de las condiciones físicas de los pacientes con COVID-19, reducir la tasa de derivaciones y mitigar los riesgos de hospitalización y de muerte. Material y métodos Realizado en el Centro Terapéutico Dibaj, ciudad de Hamadan, Irán, un ensayo controlado aleatorizado doble ciego abarcó 225 pacientes con COVID-19 de abril a septiembre de 2022. Se obtuvo la aprobación ética de la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Hamadan (Aprobación n.° IR.UMSHA .REC.1400.957), con el protocolo registrado en el Registro Iraní de Ensayos Clínicos (Registro n.° IRCT20220302054167N1). Los pacientes cumplieron con el diagnóstico de COVID-19 a través de la presentación de síntomas y la confirmación por PCR, excluyendo aquellos con antecedentes de vacunas y afectación de órganos. Los pacientes con una saturación de oxígeno superior al 92% se asignaron a tres grupos: el grupoA recibió N-acetilcisteína, el grupoB recibió bromhexina y el grupoC recibió atención estándar. Los seguimientos de los niveles de oxígeno, los síntomas y las necesidades de hospitalización se realizaron los días7 y 14, con pacientes hospitalizados monitorizados durante un mes después de la hospitalización. Resultados El estudio encontró que tanto la N-acetilcisteína como la bromhexina pueden reducir efectivamente las tasas de hospitalización y la mortalidad y acortar la duración de la hospitalización... (AU)

Introduction and aim Since its emergence in December 2019, the coronavirus disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus2 has become a global emergency, spreading rapidly worldwide. In response to the early referral of these patients to outpatient health centers, we decided to seek more effective treatments in the early stages of their referral. This study aims to prevent both the progression and deterioration of the physical conditions of COVID-19 patients, reduce the rate of referrals, and mitigate the risks of hospitalization and death. Material and methods Conducted at Dibaj Therapeutic Center, Hamadan City, Iran, a double-blind randomized controlled trial encompassed 225 COVID-19 patients from April to September 2022. Ethical approval was obtained from Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (Approval No.: IR.UMSHA.REC.1400.957), with the protocol registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (Registration No.: IRCT20220302054167N1). In this study, we included patients who tested positive for COVID-19 PCR and were symptomatic, excluding those who were pregnant or had received a COVID-19 vaccine. Patients with oxygen saturation above 92% were allocated to three groups: GroupA received N-acetylcysteine, GroupB received Bromhexine, and GroupC received standard care. Follow-ups on oxygen levels, symptoms, and hospitalization needs were conducted on days 7 and 14, with hospitalized patients monitored for one month post-hospitalization. Results The study found that both N-acetylcysteine and Bromhexine can effectively reduce hospitalization rates and mortality and shorten the duration of hospitalization. The third visit of patients who received N-acetylcysteine showed an increase of 1.33% in oxygen saturation compared to their first visit, and in patients who received Bromhexine, this increase was 1.19%. The mortality rate was 9.33% in the control group and zero in both groups of patients who received medication... (AU)

Evaluación de la eficacia de la N-acetilcisteína y la bromhexina en comparación con la atención estándar en la prevención de la hospitalización de pacientes ambulatorios con COVID-19: un ensayo clínico aleatorizado doble ciego / Evaluation of the efficacy of N-acetylcysteine and bromhexine compared with standard care in preventing hospitalization of outpatients with COVID-19: a double blind randomized clinical trial

Introducción y objetivo Desde su aparición en diciembre de 2019, la enfermedad por coronavirus causada por el síndrome respiratorio agudo severo coronavirus2 se ha convertido en una emergencia mundial, propagándose rápidamente por todo el mundo. En respuesta a la derivación temprana de estos pacientes a centros de salud ambulatorios, decidimos buscar tratamientos más eficaces en las primeras etapas de su derivación. Este estudio tiene como objetivo prevenir tanto la progresión como el deterioro de las condiciones físicas de los pacientes con COVID-19, reducir la tasa de derivaciones y mitigar los riesgos de hospitalización y de muerte. Material y métodos Realizado en el Centro Terapéutico Dibaj, ciudad de Hamadan, Irán, un ensayo controlado aleatorizado doble ciego abarcó 225 pacientes con COVID-19 de abril a septiembre de 2022. Se obtuvo la aprobación ética de la Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Hamadan (Aprobación n.° IR.UMSHA .REC.1400.957), con el protocolo registrado en el Registro Iraní de Ensayos Clínicos (Registro n.° IRCT20220302054167N1). Los pacientes cumplieron con el diagnóstico de COVID-19 a través de la presentación de síntomas y la confirmación por PCR, excluyendo aquellos con antecedentes de vacunas y afectación de órganos. Los pacientes con una saturación de oxígeno superior al 92% se asignaron a tres grupos: el grupoA recibió N-acetilcisteína, el grupoB recibió bromhexina y el grupoC recibió atención estándar. Los seguimientos de los niveles de oxígeno, los síntomas y las necesidades de hospitalización se realizaron los días7 y 14, con pacientes hospitalizados monitorizados durante un mes después de la hospitalización. Resultados El estudio encontró que tanto la N-acetilcisteína como la bromhexina pueden reducir efectivamente las tasas de hospitalización y la mortalidad y acortar la duración de la hospitalización... (AU)

Introduction and aim Since its emergence in December 2019, the coronavirus disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus2 has become a global emergency, spreading rapidly worldwide. In response to the early referral of these patients to outpatient health centers, we decided to seek more effective treatments in the early stages of their referral. This study aims to prevent both the progression and deterioration of the physical conditions of COVID-19 patients, reduce the rate of referrals, and mitigate the risks of hospitalization and death. Material and methods Conducted at Dibaj Therapeutic Center, Hamadan City, Iran, a double-blind randomized controlled trial encompassed 225 COVID-19 patients from April to September 2022. Ethical approval was obtained from Hamadan University of Medical Sciences (Approval No.: IR.UMSHA.REC.1400.957), with the protocol registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (Registration No.: IRCT20220302054167N1). In this study, we included patients who tested positive for COVID-19 PCR and were symptomatic, excluding those who were pregnant or had received a COVID-19 vaccine. Patients with oxygen saturation above 92% were allocated to three groups: GroupA received N-acetylcysteine, GroupB received Bromhexine, and GroupC received standard care. Follow-ups on oxygen levels, symptoms, and hospitalization needs were conducted on days 7 and 14, with hospitalized patients monitored for one month post-hospitalization. Results The study found that both N-acetylcysteine and Bromhexine can effectively reduce hospitalization rates and mortality and shorten the duration of hospitalization. The third visit of patients who received N-acetylcysteine showed an increase of 1.33% in oxygen saturation compared to their first visit, and in patients who received Bromhexine, this increase was 1.19%. The mortality rate was 9.33% in the control group and zero in both groups of patients who received medication... (AU)

[Bromhexine is a potential drug for COVID-19; From hypothesis to clinical trials].

COVID-19 (novel coronavirus disease 2019), caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has various clinical manifestations and several pathogenic pathways. Although several therapeutic options have been used to control COVID-19, none of these medications have been proven to be a definitive cure. Transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) is a protease that has a key role in the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into host cells. Following the binding of the viral spike (S) protein to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors of the host cells, TMPRSS2 processes and activates the S protein on the epithelial cells. As a result, the membranes of the virus and host cell fuse. Bromhexine is a specific TMPRSS2 inhibitor that potentially inhibits the infectivity cycle of SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, several clinical trials are evaluating the efficacy of bromhexine in COVID-19 patients. The findings of these studies have shown that bromhexine is effective in improving the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 and has prophylactic effects by inhibiting TMPRSS2 and viral penetration into the host cells. Bromhexine alone cannot cure all of the symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, it could be an effective addition to control and prevent the disease progression along with other drugs that are used to treat COVID-19. Further studies are required to investigate the efficacy of bromhexine in COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV Spike-Mediated Cell-Cell Fusion Differ in Their Requirements for Receptor Expression and Proteolytic Activation.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infects cells through interaction of its spike protein (SARS2-S) with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and activation by proteases, in particular transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2). Viruses can also spread through fusion of infected with uninfected cells. We compared the requirements of ACE2 expression, proteolytic activation, and sensitivity to inhibitors for SARS2-S-mediated and SARS-CoV-S (SARS1-S)-mediated cell-cell fusion. SARS2-S-driven fusion was moderately increased by TMPRSS2 and strongly by ACE2, while SARS1-S-driven fusion was strongly increased by TMPRSS2 and less so by ACE2 expression. In contrast to that of SARS1-S, SARS2-S-mediated cell-cell fusion was efficiently activated by batimastat-sensitive metalloproteases. Mutation of the S1/S2 proteolytic cleavage site reduced effector cell-target cell fusion when ACE2 or TMPRSS2 was limiting and rendered SARS2-S-driven cell-cell fusion more dependent on TMPRSS2. When both ACE2 and TMPRSS2 were abundant, initial target cell-effector cell fusion was unaltered compared to that of wild-type (wt) SARS2-S, but syncytia remained smaller. Mutation of the S2 cleavage (S2') site specifically abrogated activation by TMPRSS2 for both cell-cell fusion and SARS2-S-driven pseudoparticle entry but still allowed for activation by metalloproteases for cell-cell fusion and by cathepsins for particle entry. Finally, we found that the TMPRSS2 inhibitor bromhexine, unlike the inhibitor camostat, was unable to reduce TMPRSS2-activated cell-cell fusion by SARS1-S and SARS2-S. Paradoxically, bromhexine enhanced cell-cell fusion in the presence of TMPRSS2, while its metabolite ambroxol exhibited inhibitory activity under some conditions. On Calu-3 lung cells, ambroxol weakly inhibited SARS2-S-driven lentiviral pseudoparticle entry, and both substances exhibited a dose-dependent trend toward weak inhibition of authentic SARS-CoV-2.IMPORTANCE Cell-cell fusion allows viruses to infect neighboring cells without the need to produce free virus and contributes to tissue damage by creating virus-infected syncytia. Our results demonstrate that the S2' cleavage site is essential for activation by TMPRSS2 and unravel important differences between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, among those, greater dependence of SARS-CoV-2 on ACE2 expression and activation by metalloproteases for cell-cell fusion. Bromhexine, reportedly an inhibitor of TMPRSS2, is currently being tested in clinical trials against coronavirus disease 2019. Our results indicate that bromhexine enhances fusion under some conditions. We therefore caution against the use of bromhexine in high dosages until its effects on SARS-CoV-2 spike activation are better understood. The related compound ambroxol, which similarly to bromhexine is clinically used as an expectorant, did not exhibit activating effects on cell-cell fusion. Both compounds exhibited weak inhibitory activity against SARS-CoV-2 infection at high concentrations, which might be clinically attainable for ambroxol.

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of bromhexine hydrochloride tablets in treating pediatric COVID-19: A protocol for meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Bromhexine hydrochloride tablets may be effective in the treatment of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in children. This study will further evaluate the efficacy and safety of bromhexine hydrochloride tablets in the treatment of COVID-19 in children. METHODS: The following electronic databases will be searched, with all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to August 2020 to be included: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the Chongqing VIP China Science and Technology Database (VIP), Wanfang, the Technology Periodical Database, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM). As well as the above, Baidu, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), Google Scholar, and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) will also be searched to obtain more comprehensive data. Besides, the references of the included literature will also be traced to supplement our search results and to obtain all relevant literature. RESULTS: This systematic review will evaluate the current status of bromhexine hydrochloride in the treatment of COVID-19 in children, to evaluate its efficacy and safety. CONCLUSION: This study will provide the latest evidence for evaluating the efficacy and safety of bromhexine hydrochloride in the treatment of COVID-19 in children. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020199805. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The private information of individuals will not be published. This systematic review will also not involve endangering participant rights. Ethical approval is not available. The results may be published in peer-reviewed journals or disseminated at relevant conferences.

Comparison of Bromhexine and its Active Metabolite - Ambroxol as Potential Analgesics Reducing Oxaliplatin-induced Neuropathic Pain - Pharmacodynamic and Molecular Docking Studies.

BACKGROUND: Painful peripheral neuropathy is a dose-limiting adverse effect of the antitumor drug oxaliplatin. The main symptoms of neuropathy: tactile allodynia and cold hyperalgesia, appear in more than 80% of patients on oxaliplatin therapy and are due to the overexpression of neuronal sodium channels (Navs) and neuroinflammation. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed antiallodynic and antihyperalgesic properties of two repurposed drugs with antiinflammatory and Nav-blocking properties (bromhexine and its pharmacologically active metabolite - ambroxol) in a mouse model of neuropathic pain induced by oxaliplatin. Using molecular docking techniques, we predicted targets implicated in the observed in vivo activity of bromhexine. METHODS: Oxaliplatin (a single intraperitoneal dose of 10 mg/kg) induced tactile allodynia and cold hyperalgesia in CD-1 mice and the effectiveness of single-dose or repeated-dose bromhexine and ambroxol to attenuate pain hypersensitivity was assessed in von Frey and cold plate tests. Additionally, Veber analysis and molecular docking experiments of bromhexine on mouse (m) and human (h) Nav1.6-1.9 were carried out. RESULTS: At the corresponding doses, ambroxol was more effective than bromhexine as an antiallodynic agent. However, at the dose of 150 mg/kg, ambroxol induced motor impairments in mice. Repeated-dose bromhexine and ambroxol partially attenuated the development of late-phase tactile allodynia in oxaliplatin-treated mice. Only 7-day administration of bromhexine attenuated the development of late-phase cold hyperalgesia. Bromhexine was predicted to be a strong inhibitor of mNav1.6, mNav1.7, mNav1.9, and hNav1.7-hNav1.9. CONCLUSION: The conversion of bromhexine to other than ambroxol active metabolites should be considered when interpreting some of its in vivo effects. Nav-blocking properties of bromhexine (and previously also predicted for ambroxol) might underlie its ability to attenuate pain caused by oxaliplatin.

Comprehensive analysis of drugs to treat SARS­CoV­2 infection: Mechanistic insights into current COVID­19 therapies (Review).

The major impact produced by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS­CoV­2) focused many researchers attention to find treatments that can suppress transmission or ameliorate the disease. Despite the very fast and large flow of scientific data on possible treatment solutions, none have yet demonstrated unequivocal clinical utility against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID­19). This work represents an exhaustive and critical review of all available data on potential treatments for COVID­19, highlighting their mechanistic characteristics and the strategy development rationale. Drug repurposing, also known as drug repositioning, and target based methods are the most used strategies to advance therapeutic solutions into clinical practice. Current in silico, in vitro and in vivo evidence regarding proposed treatments are summarized providing strong support for future research efforts.

Bromhexine elevates REP2 expression to stimulate secretion from human primary conjunctiva fornix epithelial cells.

Bromhexine was reported to relieve the symptoms of Sjogren Syndrome at an early stage. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we administered bromhexine at low doses in human primary conjunctival fornix epithelial cells, and found it stimulated MUC5AC secretion and lipid droplet production. Expression of the metabolism-related gene CHML was also upregulated by bromhexine treatment, and REP2, the protein produced by the CHML gene, was induced. These results suggest that bromhexine is a potential candidate eye drop drug for the treatment of multiple types of dry eye disease, not only limited to the treatment of dry eyes in Sjogren Syndrome.

Acetilcisteína: Una actualización clínica y farmacológica sobre su efecto mucolítico. Estudio de revisión / Acetylcisteine. A clinical and pharmacological actualization with special. Reference to its mucolytic efect

The authors present a clinical and farmacological evaluation of the effect and safety of N-acetylcysteine in chronic obstructive diseases. The N-actylcysteine (NAC) is a sulphorated amino acid employed as an mucolytic agent. The efficacy and tolerability of oral NAC as compared with other agents was determined, in the mucolytic treatment on mucus hypersecretion and in the management of respiratory tract fluids and sputums from cigarette smokers, and also as a bronchial mucus fluidifying agent. A sistematic review and analysis of the effect of NAC and its effectiveness. In the treatment of acute respiratory disorders in children was determined

Enhancement of lung levels of antibiotics by ambroxol and bromhexine.

INTRODUCTION: Major unmet needs remain for improved antibiotic treatment in lung infections. While development of new antibiotics is needed to overcome resistance, other approaches to optimize therapy using existing agents are also attractive. Ambroxol induces lung autophagy at human-relevant doses and improves lung levels of several approved antibiotics. Areas covered: This review discusses preclinical and clinical studies of the effects of ambroxol (and its prodrug precursor bromhexine) co-treatment upon levels of antibiotics in lung tissue, sputum, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Expert opinion: Ambroxol co-treatment is associated with significant increases in lung tissue and airway surface fluid levels of a range of antibiotics including beta lactams, glycopeptides, macrolides, nitrofurans, and rifamycins. In most cases, the increased levels are only modest and are insufficient to overcome high-level resistance against that same antibiotic class, and so co-treatment with ambroxol is unlikely to alter clinical outcomes. Additionally, for most antibiotics there is no evidence that outcomes in non-resistant disease are improved by higher drug levels, and there is limited efficacy of co-treatment of antibiotics with ambroxol for most pathogens. The two cases where ambroxol may improve therapy are rifampin-sensitive tuberculosis and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection, and vancomycin sensitive methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia.

[Therapeutic modalities for the management of cough associated with acute respiratory viral infection, effective in an otolaryngologist's practice].

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness ascoril therapy in comparison with the treatment using the mucoactive agent lasolvan in the adult patients suffering from productive cough associated with acute viral respiratory infection. Patients and methods. The study included 120 patients suffering from productive cough associated with acute viral respiratory infection. They were divided into two groups. The patients comprising group 1 (n=6.) were treated with ascoril, those in group 2 (n=60) were given lasolvan. Results. The effectiveness of the treatment of cough in group 1 was found to be higher compared with that in group 2 (p<0.05); moreover, it was associated with better dynamics of certain indicators of the quality of life, such as the social activity level, vitality, and general health (p<0.05). The safety of the proposed treatment was confirmed by the absence of the adverse events throughout the entire treatment period.

Differential modulation of IgE-dependent activation of human basophils by ambroxol and related secretolytic analogues.

Ambroxol is a widely used secretolytic agent originally developed from vasicine, a natural alkaloid found in Adhatoda vasica, extracts of which have been used to treat bronchitis, asthma, and rheumatism. We previously reported that ambroxol inhibits IgE-dependent mediator secretion from human mast cells and basophils, key effector cells of allergic inflammation. Here, the mechanisms involved in the inhibitory properties of ambroxol were assessed in comparison to other secretolytic analogues (e.g. vasicine, bromhexine, sputolysin). The results show that, in comparison to ambroxol, which reduced IgE-dependent histamine release from basophils at 10 microM-1 mM, the release of the amine was only moderately reduced by sputolysin and vasicine at 1 mM. In contrast, above 10 microM, bromhexine was found to be toxic to basophils in vitro as evidenced by induction of histamine release and reduced cell viability. In contrast, the inhibitory actions of ambroxol at concentrations below 1 mM were not toxic and entirely reversible. Ambroxol was also more potent than either sputolysin or vasicine in attenuating basophil IL-4 and IL-13 secretions, whereas bromhexine-induced suppression of de novo cytokine synthesis was due to toxic effects. Additionally, ambroxol reduced IgE-dependent p38 MAPK phosphorylation in basophils, unlike bromhexine, sputolysin and vasicine. These results clearly show that ambroxol is both more potent and effective at inhibiting IgE-dependent basophil mediator release and p38 MAPK activity than the other secretolytic analogues employed. The therapeutic potential of ambroxol as an anti-allergic agent is further underlined by these data.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between cefaclor and bromhexine in healthy Chinese volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetic interaction between cefaclor and bromhexine in healthy Chinese volunteers. METHODS: Twelve subjects received a cefaclor (CEF) treatment, a bromhexine (BHX) treatment, and a co-treatment of CEF and BHX with a 3 x 3 Latin square design. The wash-out time between periods was 14 days. The plasma and urine drug concentrations of CEF and BHX were detected by HPLC-UV and LC/MS, respectively. RESULTS: All the 12 volunteers completed the study. There were no significant differences in AUC 0-t and Cmax of CEF in logarithm between the single administration group of CEF and the co-administration group of CEF with BHX. Two one sided t-test showed that CEF was bioequivalent in the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in tmax, MRT, t1/2, and Clr between the 2 groups. Vd/F was significantly lower in the single CEF group than in the co-administration group of CEF and BHX. There were no significant differences of AUC 0-t and Cmax of BHX in logarithm between the single administration group of BHX and the co-administration group of BHX with CEF. Two one sided t-test showed that BHX was bioequivalent in the 2 groups. There were no significant differences in tmax, MRT, t1/2, Vd/F, and Clr between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: There is no significant pharmacokinetic parameter change in the drug absorption, metabolism, and excretion, but Vd/F of CEF significant increases in the co-administration of CEF with BHX. The co-administration of CEF and BHX has no adverse drug interaction. The increase of Vd/F may be a favorable drug interaction, which may be the mechanism of the synergistic effect of the 2 drugs.

Kinetics of bromhexine-mediated down-regulation of focal adhesive molecules of uterus and trophectoderm affecting conception in the rat.

PURPOSE: Quantitative evaluation of properties of bromhexine (B) for expression of uterine proteins in ovariectomized (OVX) and pregnant rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Expression of proteins through SDS-PAGE, along with incorporation of glycosidic moieties, was conducted in pregnant and OVX rats under B influence. These findings were corroborated with other tests such as implantation sites, fetal and litter sizes in pregnant rats. RESULTS: In OVX animals, even under the influence of estradiol dipropionate and progesterone, the B recreated a condition akin to OVX animals. It also induced 50-80% inhibition in the incorporation of glycosidic moieties to polypeptide chain. Distinct reduction in implantation sites, fetal sizes and interference in the conception (16/46) in pregnant rats substantiated the results of the action of B as an antiimplantation agent. CONCLUSION: Bromhexine has shown interference in blastocyst attachment, conception, reduction in number of implantation sites and dwarfing of fetuses; hence, it is a potential candidate for antiimplantation.

Bronquial solución: estudio de la variable tiempo de llenado en la validación del nuevo proceso de fabricación / Bronchial solution: study of the variable time of filling in the validation of the new manufacturing process

Antecedentes y Objetivos: En la validación del nuevo proceso del Bronquial Solución, una de las variables que a priori se observó en la validación como crítica, fue el rango de tiempo durante el cual puede ser necesario llevar a cabo la fase de llenado en el envase final del elaborado. Se estudia el efecto de la variable tiempo de llenado en la elaboración del Bronquial Solución con el objeto de determinar la necesidad de mantener un control de proceso en el producto intermedio. Lugar de Realización: Centro Militar de Farmacia de la Defensa (Madrid) Materiales y Métodos: Se estudian 10 lotes del elaborado, a tres tiempos inicial, medio y final. Las muestras se analizan, por cromatografía líquida de alta presión. De los componentes de la fórmula se cuantifican los principios activos Efedrina, Codeína, Difenhidramina y Bromhexina y de los excipientes, Nipagin, Nipasol y Sacarina. Se realiza el análisis de variancia y la prueba Fisher con la corrección de Bonferroni. Resultados: De los resultados obtenidos en los cromatogramas se verifica el supuesto de normalidad (p>0,05) y de homogeneidad de variancia (p>0,05). El análisis de variancia (p>0,05) y las comparaciones múltiples de los siete parámetros estudiados entre los tiempos inicial, medio y final nos muestran que no existe ninguna diferencia significativa. Conclusiones: El tiempo de llenado no afecta a las especificaciones establecidas para el elaborado Bronquial Solución, por lo que se justifica la ausencia de realización del control intermedio rutinario en proceso

Objectives and precedings: In the validation ofthe Bronchial Solution new process, one ofthe variables previously observed as critical, in such validation, was the time rank in which the filling of the finally prepared bottle may be necessary. We study the effect of the time of filling variable, in the Bonchial Solution preparing, to determine the needing of an intermedial control desing for the product processing. Carryng out place: Centro Militar de Farmacia de la Defensa (Madrid). Methods: 10 product sets are studied, in three moments; inicial intermedial and final. The samples were analysed by high pressure liquid chromatography. From the formula compounds were quantified the active principIes Efedrin, Codein, Diphenhydramin and Bromhexin, as much as the excipients Nipagin, Nipasol and Saccharin. An analysis of the variance was done, and the Fischer test with the Bonferroni 's correction too. Results: the results obtained from chromatograms expressed the supposed normal (p>0.05) and homogeneous (p>0.05) variance. The analysis ofthe variance (p>0.05) and the multiple test comparing of the seven studied parameters, referred to the initial, intermedial and final times, don't show us any significative differenceo Conclusions: time of filling does not make any influence over the stablished norms for the Bronchial Solution product, and it justifies the absence of a routine intermedial control of the process

Assessment of bromhexine as a treatment regimen in Sjögren's syndrome-like disease in the NOD (non-obese diabetic) mouse.

OBJECTIVE: Bromhexine has been reported to alleviate the xerostomia and xerophthalmia associated with secondary Sjögren's syndrome. The aim of this study was to determine if it might prove useful in the treatment of Sjögren's syndrome-like disease of the NOD mouse model for autoimmune sialoadenitis. METHODS: Groups of mice were divided into sets receiving 60 mg/kg bromhexine in drinking water and control pair-fed animals. The efficacy of drug treatment was assessed by weekly measurement of stimulated saliva volumes, protein concentration, and amylase activity. At termination (20 weeks) submandibular and lacrimal glands were removed to assess the levels of lymphocytic infiltration by histological evaluation under light microscopy. RESULTS: Control and bromhexine-treated groups of mice showed no difference in the loss or rate of reduction in stimulated saliva flow over the 12 weeks of treatment. No differences were noted in the protein concentration and amylase loss with increasing age of the animals. Similar temporal changes in total protein profiles and aberrant expression of the 20 kDa parotid secretory protein isoform were observed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel profiles and Western bolt analysis. Histological evaluation of exocrine gland sections failed to detect any reduction in focal lymphocyte infiltration. CONCLUSION: Bromhexine therapy did not alter the development or severity of Sjögren's syndrome-like disease in the NOD mouse model for autoimmune sialoadenitis.

The antioxidative activity of the mucoregulatory agents: ambroxol, bromhexine and N-acetyl-L-cysteine. A pulse radiolysis study.

Ambroxol and bromhexine are shown to be scavengers of both superoxide and hydroxyl radicals as determined by pulse radiolysis experiments. The dismutation of superoxide was accelerated 3-fold by bromhexine and 2.5-fold by ambroxol over the rate of spontaneous dismutation. The reaction constants of hydroxyl radicals with bromhexine and ambroxol were determined by competition kinetics to be 1.58 +/- 0.15 x 10(10) M-1S-1 and 1.04 +/- 0.1 x 10(10) M-1S-1, respectively. N-acetyl-L-cysteine also reacted with hydroxyl radicals (1.28 +/- 0.14 x 10(10) M-1S-1) but not with superoxide radical. These effects may be clinically relevant in the treatment of oxidant-associated lung damage induced by inflammatory agents and/or environmental pollutants.