Omalizumab can inhibit respiratory reaction during aspirin desensitization.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin desensitization has been associated with benefit in management of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). An intervention that would encourage aspirin desensitization to be performed more frequently has substantial potential for improving outcomes and quality of life in patients with AERD. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether omalizumab administration would be associated with attenuation of aspirin-provoked bronchospasm in patients with AERD undergoing aspirin desensitization. METHODS: We carried out a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which subjects with AERD who fulfilled label criteria for omalizumab received omalizumab or placebo for 16 weeks, and then underwent aspirin desensitization. RESULTS: Eleven subjects completed aspirin desensitization. Of the 7 who were randomized to omalizumab, 5 had no respiratory reaction during aspirin desensitization. Compared with placebo, omalizumab was associated with a significantly greater likelihood for subjects with AERD to have no respiratory reaction during desensitization (P = .04, Fisher exact test). There was an overall difference in urinary leukotriene E4 (LTE4) levels in subjects who received omalizumab and did not have a respiratory reaction during desensitization compared with subjects randomized to placebo (P = .035, mixed model with interaction). Urinary LTE4 levels were significantly higher with respiratory reaction in placebo subjects compared with levels obtained after the 100-mg dose in AERD subjects who had no respiratory reaction (P < .001, mixed model with interaction). CONCLUSION: In atopic AERD subjects, omalizumab administration for 16 weeks was associated with "clinically silent" desensitization. Further studies to investigate the therapeutic utility of omalizumab in patients with AERD who are candidates for aspirin desensitization are warranted based on these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00555971.

Futility of current urine salbutamol doping control.

AIMS: Salbutamol is used in the management of obstructive bronchospasm, including that of some elite athletes. It is claimed that high salbutamol (oral) doses may also have an anabolic effect. Therefore, inhalation of salbutamol is restricted by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) to a maximal daily dose. Urine is tested for violations, but recent cases have resulted in a debate regarding the validity of this approach. It was our aim to determine whether current approaches are sufficiently able to differentiate approved usage from violations. METHODS: We extracted pharmacokinetic parameters from literature for salbutamol and its sulphated metabolite. From these parameters, a semi-physiological pharmacokinetic model of inhaled and orally administered salbutamol was synthesized, validated against literature data, and used to perform clinical trial simulations (n = 1000) of possible urine concentrations over time resulting from WADA-allowed and oral unacceptable dosages. RESULTS: The synthesized model was able to predict the literature data well. Simulations showed a very large range of salbutamol concentrations, with a significant portion of virtual subjects (15.4%) exceeding the WADA threshold limit of 1000 ng ml-1 at 1 h post-dose. CONCLUSIONS: The observed large variability in urine concentrations indicates that determining the administered dose from a single untimed urine sample is not feasible. The current threshold inadvertently leads to incorrect assumptions of violation, whereas many violations will go unnoticed, especially when samples are taken long after drug administration. These issues, combined with the dubious assertion of its anabolic effect, leads us to conclude that the large effort involved in testing should be reconsidered.

New-onset bronchospasm or recrudescence of asthma associated with cocaine abuse.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the occurrence of new-onset bronchospasm or the recrudescence of asthma is associated with the use of cocaine. METHODS: A consecutive sample of patients presenting to an inner-city adult ED with new-onset bronchospasm or recrudescence of bronchospasm after > 5 years were prospectively enrolled in a case-control prevalence study. The bronchospasm patients were queried as to their exposure to illicit drugs, and urine was obtained to screen for cocaine and its metabolite, benzoylecgonine. An age- and sex-matched control group was composed of randomly chosen subjects without respiratory complaints or a history of asthma. The control group was also screened by urine toxicology for cocaine and its metabolite, benzoylecgonine. RESULTS: In the asthma group, 21/59 (36%) had a urine toxicologic screen positive for cocaine metabolite (benzoylecgonine). Of the 21 with a positive screen for cocaine, 8 denied illicit drug abuse. Among the 13 patients reporting drug use, 10 said that they smoked crack and 3 snorted cocaine. In the control group, 8/53 (15%) were positive. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, with adjustment for age and sex, indicated that the use of cocaine was associated with a 3-fold higher prevalence of new-onset bronchospasm or recrudescence of asthma (OR = 3.28, 95% CI: 1.26 to 8.50). CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be an association between cocaine use and new-onset bronchospasm or recrudescence of asthma in this inner-city ED population. Further study is necessary to determine the basis for this association.

[Metabolic changes in arachidonic acid during aspirin desensitization]. / Cambios metabólicos del ácido araquidónico en la desensibilización a la aspirina.

Aspirin sensitivity occurs in 10% of all asthmatics patients. In this subset of asthmatics, nasal congestion and bronchospasm occurs between 30-180 minutes after ingestion of aspirin. Following a respiratory reaction to aspirin, all patients can be desensitized to aspirin by repetitively introducing small and then larger doses of aspirin until the asthmatic subject can ingest 650 mg of aspirin without adverse effect. The mechanism of aspirin sensitivity are incompletely understood. And the reasons why ASA desensitization occurs universally are unknown. In this study, known ASA sensitive and control insensitive asthmatics were challenged with ASA. Urine was collected before, during induced bronchospasm, and after ingestion of 650 mg of ASA when the adverse effect (ie., acute desensitization) had subsided. Excretion levels of cyclo-oxygenase and lipoxygenase products in the urine were determined.