ABSTRACT
This study aimed to evaluate protection induced by the vaccine candidate B. ovis ΔabcBA against experimental challenge with wild type B. ovis in rams. Rams were subcutaneously immunized with B. ovis ΔabcBA encapsulated with sterile alginate or with the non encapsulated vaccine strain. Serum, urine, and semen samples were collected during two months after immunization. The rams were then challenged with wild type B. ovis (ATCC25840), and the results were compared to non immunized and experimentally challenged rams. Immunization, particularly with encapsulated B. ovis ΔabcBA, prevented infection, secretion of wild type B. ovis in the semen and urine, shedding of neutrophils in the semen, and the development of clinical changes, gross and microscopic lesions induced by the wild type B. ovis reference strain. Collectively, our data indicates that the B. ovis ΔabcBA strain is an exceptionally good vaccine strain for preventing brucellosis caused by B. ovis infection in rams.
Subject(s)
ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters/deficiency , Brucella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Brucella ovis/immunology , Brucellosis/veterinary , Sheep Diseases/prevention & control , Alginates/chemistry , Animals , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Blood/microbiology , Brucella Vaccine/genetics , Brucella Vaccine/pharmacology , Brucella ovis/genetics , Brucella ovis/metabolism , Brucellosis/immunology , Brucellosis/microbiology , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Capsules/administration & dosage , Capsules/pharmacology , Glucuronic Acid/chemistry , Hexuronic Acids/chemistry , Injections, Subcutaneous , Male , Semen/microbiology , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/immunology , Sheep Diseases/microbiology , Sheep, Domestic , Urine/microbiologyABSTRACT
In the present study, we report an attempt to improve the immunogenicity of the Omp31 antigen by a DNA prime-protein boost immunization regimen. We immunized BALB/c mice with an Omp31 DNA vaccine (pCIOmp31) followed by boosting with recombinant Omp31 (rOmp31) in incomplete Freund's adjuvant and characterized the resulting immune responses and the protective efficacy against Brucella ovis and B. melitensis infection. Immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) and IgG2a titers were higher in sera from pCIOmp31/rOmp31-immunized mice than in sera from mice immunized with pCIOmp31 or rOmp31 alone. Splenocytes from pCIOmp31/rOmp31-immunized mice produced significantly higher levels of gamma interferon than did those from mice given rOmp31 alone. In contrast, interleukin 2 (IL-2) production levels were comparable between the two groups of immunized mice. Cells from all immunized mice produced undetectable levels of IL-4. Notably, rOmp31 stimulated IL-10 production in the pCIOmp31/rOmp31-immunized group but not in the pCIOmp31- or rOmp31-immunized group. Although the prime-boost regimen induced specific cytotoxic responses, these responses could not reach the levels achieved by the pCIOmp31 immunization. In conclusion, pCIOmp31 priming followed by rOmp31 boosting led to moderately improved protection against a challenge with B. ovis or B. melitensis.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins/immunology , Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella ovis/immunology , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Vaccines, DNA/immunology , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Brucella Vaccine/pharmacology , Brucellosis/immunology , Female , Immunization, Secondary , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Interferon-gamma/blood , Interleukin-2/blood , Interleukin-4/blood , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Th1 Cells/immunology , Th1 Cells/microbiology , Vaccines, DNA/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Hace casi 100 años la brucelosis humana fue considerada por Zammit y Horrocks como una zoonosis, sólo 18 años después que Bruce identificó el agente etiológico de la fiebre de Malta. A lo largo de los años, el avance científico se ha visto encaminado primordialmente al control de la brucelosis animal en los aspectos de diagnóstico y vacunación. En cuanto a la enfermedad en el humano, el progreso más importante ha sido la quimioterapia, aunque en la última década el diagnóstico correcto ha sido un asunto de preocupación general. Las estrategias de erradicación de la brucelosis se divide en tres categorías: 1) Erradicación de la brucelosis animal; 2) Mejoramiento de las medidas de higiene individual y saneamiento y 3) Inmunización. Las vacunas contra la brucelosis han sido desarrolladas a lo largo de tres líneas: 1) vacunas vivas preparadas con cepas atenuadas como B. abortus cepa 19 y B. melitensis cepa Rev.1; 2) células completas inactivadas, como B. abortus cepa 45/20 y B. melitensis H-38 que se administran con adyuvante oleoso y 3) vacunas preparadas con fracciones celulares. Todas ellas han sido usadas ampliamente en el control de la brucelosis en animales y sólo en algunos casos muy particulares en humanos