Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 514
Filter
1.
Burns ; 50(5): 1101-1115, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429127

ABSTRACT

Unlike other developed countries that hold national burn registries to monitor burn injury and care, Canada relies on single-centre secondary datasets and administrative databases as surveillance mechanisms. The objective of this study was to determine the knowledge gap faced in Canada for not having a dedicated burn registry. A comprehensive scoping review was conducted to identify the burn literature that has arisen from secondary datasets in Canada. Literature of all study designs was included with the exception of case reports and cases series. Once data extraction was concluded, a thematic framework was constructed based on the information that arose from nations that hold national burn registries. Eighty-eight studies were included. Twelve studies arose from national datasets, and 18 from provincial databases, most of which were from Ontario and British Columbia. Only seven studies were conducted using a combination of Canadian units' single-centre datasets. The majority of included studies (58%) resulted from non-collaborative use of single-centre secondary datasets. Research efforts were predominantly conducted by burn units in Ontario, British Columbia, Manitoba and Alberta. A significant number of the included studies were outdated and several provinces/territories had no published burn data whatsoever. Efforts should be made towards the development of systems to surveil burn injury and care in Canada. This study supports the development of a nation-wide burn registry to bridge this knowledge gap.


Subject(s)
Burns , Registries , Burns/epidemiology , Burns/therapy , Humans , Canada/epidemiology , Databases, Factual , Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Burn Units/organization & administration
2.
Burns ; 50(5): 1083-1090, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38538444

ABSTRACT

AIM: To collect data on self-harm burn patients at a national level in Finland and analyze patient characteristics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: First, we went through The National Care Register for Health Care (Hilmo) records from 2011 to 2015 to find all patients in Finland with both burn and self-harm ICD10 codes. Then we investigated the medical records of all patients treated at the National Burn Centre (NBC) in Helsinki in the period 2011-2020. Patients admitted to the hospital because of self-harm burn injuries were compared to those without self-harm injuries. Patients below 18 years old were excluded. RESULTS: The Hilmo register consisted of a total of 3391 adult burn patients admitted to any healthcare unit during the study period. Compared with non-self-harm patients, self-harm patients (N = 82) had lower mean age (41 years vs 54 years, p < 0.001) and longer hospitalization (18 days vs. 6 days, p < 0.05). Two-thirds of the self-harm patients (N = 38) admitted to the NBC in the period 2011-2020 had a pre-burn history of psychiatric care (66%) and one-third of them had a previous record of self-harm or suicide attempt. Men had more severe burns than women (mean TBSA 46% vs. 14%, p < 0.05), and seven of them died during the first 48 h of care, but this was not the case for any female patient. CONCLUSIONS: Self-harm burn patients were younger and had longer hospitalization at all care levels than other burn patients. Based on medical records of hospitalized self-harm burn patients, we found clear gender differences in the severity of the burn injury and in mortality, with men suffering more severe injuries, in some cases leading to death. Recognizing high-risk patients pre-burn could have a strong preventive impact.


Subject(s)
Burns , Hospitalization , Length of Stay , Registries , Self-Injurious Behavior , Suicide, Attempted , Humans , Burns/epidemiology , Burns/psychology , Male , Adult , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Suicide, Attempted/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Young Adult , Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors
3.
J Tissue Viability ; 33(2): 185-189, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38521680

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pediatric burn patients are an essential part of burn populations. However, there is limited publicly available data on the epidemiological impact of COVID-19 on pediatric burns in China. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, pediatric burn patients admitted to the Department of Burn Surgery of the First Hospital of Jilin University before and during COVID-19 were retrospectively investigated to determine the impact of COVID-19 on pediatric burn inpatients. METHODS: The information of inpatients from July 2017 to December 2019 (pre-COVID-19 group) and from January 2020 to June 2022 (COVID-19 group) in the Department of Burn Surgery at the First Hospital of Jilin University was retrospectively investigated. Demographic information of patients, length of hospital stay, total body surface area (TBSA) of burn injury, post-injury visit time, comorbidity, surgical methods, etc., were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: The COVID-19 group included 154 (10.2%) patients, and the pre-COVID-19 group included 335 (19.4%) patients (P<0.001). There were no differences in gender, age, length of hospital stay, or etiology of burns between the two groups. Compared to the pre-COVID-19 group, patients in the pre-COVID-19 group experienced a significant delay in presentation (P<0.001), had a larger TBSA of burn wound (P < 0.001), were more prone to sustaining major burns (P < 0.001), a higher likelihood of undergoing operations (P = 0.03), higher cost (P<0.001) and more complications (P<0.001). Additionally, upper extremities were the most commonly part involved in both groups (P = 0.004), with the lower extremities showed a significant increase to be involved in burn injury during COVID-19 pandemic (P = 0.007). Furthermore, the majority of guardians did not take first aid measures in both groups following burn injury (P = 0.102). CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic period, scalds remained the main reason for hospitalization. The number of hospitalized patients has decreased dramatically, while the severity of burns has significantly increased, with a notable delay in hospital visits and an increased occurrence of complications.


Subject(s)
Burn Units , Burns , COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Burns/epidemiology , Burns/therapy , China/epidemiology , Male , Female , Child , Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Burn Units/organization & administration , Child, Preschool , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Infant , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Burns ; 50(4): 813-822, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38503574

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Throughout the world, burn injury is a major cause of death and disability. In resource-limited countries, burn injury is one of the leading causes of permanent disability among children who survive traumatic injuries, and burn injury is the fourth leading cause of disability worldwide. This study applied Andersen's model of health care access to evaluate if patient characteristics (predisposing factors), burn care service availability (enabling factors) and injury characteristics (need) are associated with physical impairment at hospital discharge for patients surviving burn injuries globally. Specifically, access to rehabilitation, nutrition, operating theatre, specialized burn unit services, and critical care were investigated as enabling factors. The secondary aim was to determine whether associations between burn care service availability and impairment differed by country income level. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from the World Health Organization, Global Burn Registry. The outcome of interest was physical impairment at discharge. Simple and multivariable logistic regressions were used to test the unadjusted and adjusted associations between the availability of burn care services and impairment at hospital discharge, controlling for patient and injury characteristics. Effect modification was analyzed with service by country income level interaction terms added to the models and, if significant, the models were stratified by income. RESULTS: The sample included 6622 patients from 20 countries, with 11.2% classified with physical impairment at discharge. In the fully adjusted model, patients had 89% lower odds impairment at discharge if the treatment facility provided reliable rehabilitation services compared to providing limited or no rehabilitation services (OR.11, 95%CI.08,.16, p < .01). However, this effect was modified by county income with the strong and significant association only present in high/upper middle-income countries. Sophisticated nutritional services were also significantly associated with less impairment in high/upper middle-income countries (OR=.04, 95% CI 0.203, 0.05, p < .01), but significantly more impairment in lower middle/low-income countries (OR=2.01, 95% CI 1.50, 2.69, p < .01). Patients had 444% greater odds of impairment if treated at a center with specialty burn unit services (OR 5.44, 95%CI 3.71, 7.99, p < .01), possibly due to a selection effect. DISCUSSION: Access to reliable rehabilitation services and sophisticated nutritional services were strongly associated with less physical impairment at discharge, but only in resource-rich countries. Although these findings support the importance of rehabilitation and nutrition after burn injury, they also highlight potential disparities in the quantity or quality of services available to burn survivors in poorer countries.


Subject(s)
Burn Units , Burns , Health Services Accessibility , Patient Discharge , Registries , Humans , Burns/rehabilitation , Burns/therapy , Male , Female , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Young Adult , Infant , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Global Health , Logistic Models , Developing Countries , Income/statistics & numerical data , Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Disabled Persons/rehabilitation
5.
Burns ; 50(4): 874-884, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38245393

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Improvement in burn injury data collections and the quality of databanks has allowed meaningful study of the epidemiologic trends in burn care. The study assessed factors associated with disposition of burn injury patients from emergency department accounting for pre-hospital care and emergency care. METHODS: This prospective observational pilot study of the South Asia Burn Registry project was conducted at selected public sector burn centers in Bangladesh and Pakistan (September 2014 - January 2015). All age groups with an initial presentation to the burn centers were enrolled. Descriptive and regression analysis is presented. RESULTS: A total of 2749 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 21.7 ± 18.0 years, 55.3% were males, and about a quarter were children < 5 years. About 46.9% of the females were housewives. Scald burns were common among children (67.6%) while flame burns were common among adults (44.3%). About 75% of patients were brought in via non-ambulance mode of transport. More than 55% of patients were referrals from other facilities or clinics. The most common first aid given pre-hospital was the use of water or oil. About 25% were admitted for further care. The adjusted odds of being admitted compared to being sent home were highest for children < 5 yrs, those with higher total body surface area burnt, having arrived via ambulance, scald and electrical burn, having an associated injury and inhalational injury. CONCLUSION: The study provides insight into emergency burn care and associated factors that influenced outcomes for patients with burn injuries.


Subject(s)
Burns , Emergency Medical Services , Emergency Service, Hospital , Registries , Humans , Burns/therapy , Burns/epidemiology , Male , Female , Child , Adult , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Young Adult , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Pakistan/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Infant , Middle Aged , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Bangladesh/epidemiology , Pilot Projects , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , First Aid/statistics & numerical data , Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Body Surface Area , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Transportation of Patients/statistics & numerical data , Asia, Southern
6.
J Correct Health Care ; 29(4): 258-261, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37158784

ABSTRACT

We describe the trends and severity of deliberate scald injuries from assaults within prisons presenting to Pinderfields Hospital in the United Kingdom. Data were obtained using local records of the International Burn Injury Database. Between 2003 and 2019, the hospital's Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns treated 22 cases from at least seven prisons, with 20 cases occurring in the last 4 years. Boiling water was used in most cases. Other substances included syrups of boiling water and sugar, and hot fat. Mean total body surface area was 2.8%, most commonly the face, neck, shoulders, and anterior chest. National data identified 267 cases with a similar rising trend. These injuries increase logistical and financial burdens on our burns service due to the need for added security and police escorts during treatment. "Copycat attacks" within same prisons, sometime on the same day, raise concerns that incidence of these injuries is likely to increase. Outreach nursing and telemedicine facilities may minimize the challenges during the management period.


Subject(s)
Burn Units , Burns , Prisons , Humans , Burns/epidemiology , Burns/therapy , Burns/etiology , Incidence , Prisons/statistics & numerical data , Prisons/trends , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Water , Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Burn Units/trends
7.
Arq. ciências saúde UNIPAR ; 26(3): 764-781, set-dez. 2022.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1399464

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: evidenciar os cuidados de enfermagem descritos na literatura nacional e internacional que são aplicados em pacientes queimados em terapia intensiva. Método: revisão integrativa, realizada no período de fevereiro a dezembro de 2020, nas bases de dados eletrônicas US National Library of Medicine, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online e Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde. Resultados: foram selecionados oito artigos, os quais foram categorizados em Cuidados de Enfermagem com a pele em pacientes queimados, Cuidados de Enfermagem com a mobilidade em pacientes queimados e Cuidados de Enfermagem em pacientes queimados em relação à dor, dispositivos e prevenção de complicações. Conclusão: os cuidados de enfermagem para pacientes queimados em terapia intensiva estão intensamente atrelados aos cuidados com as lesões de pele e seus desdobramentos, assim como a prevenção de infecções.


Objective: to highlight the nursing care described in the National and International Literature that is applied to burned patients in intensive care. Methods: integrative review, carried out from February to December, 2020, using the following electronic bases: US National Library of Medicine, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online and Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde. Results: it was selected eight articles, which were categorized into Nursing Care for skin in burned patients, Nursing Care for mobility in burned patients and Nursing Care for burned patients in relation to pain, devices and prevention of complications. Conclusion: nursing care for burned patients in intensive care is associated to the care of skin lesions and their consequences, as well as the prevention of infections.


Objetivo: destacar los cuidados de enfermería descritos en la literatura nacional e internacional que se aplican en pacientes quemados en cuidados intensivos. Método: revisión integradora, realizada de febrero a diciembre de 2020, en las bases de datos electrónicas US National Library of Medicine, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online y Virtual Health Library. Resultados: se seleccionaron ocho artículos, los cuales se clasificaron en Cuidados de Enfermería con la Pelea en Pacientes Enfermos, Cuidados de Enfermería con la Movilidad en Pacientes Enfermos y Cuidados de Enfermería en Pacientes Enfermos en relación con el dolor, los dispositivos y la prevención de complicaciones. Conclusión: los cuidados de enfermería a los pacientes quemados en cuidados intensivos están intensamente ligados al cuidado de las lesiones cutáneas y sus desdoblamientos, así como a la prevención de infecciones.


Subject(s)
Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Burns/diagnosis , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Care/methods , Pain/diagnosis , Infection Control/methods , Critical Care , Libraries, Digital , Degloving Injuries/diagnosis
8.
Med. infant ; 29(3): 190-193, Septiembre 2022. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, UNISALUD, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1399567

ABSTRACT

Introducción: a partir de la pandemia por Covid19 se reportó variabilidad en la incidencia de las infecciones asociadas al cuidado de la salud (IACS). Con el objetivo de describir y comparar las tasas de IACS en la Unidad de Quemados de un hospital pediátrico de tercer nivel, antes y después del inicio de la pandemia se llevó a cabo este estudio. Material y métodos: estudio de cohorte, retrospectivo, descriptivo, de vigilancia epidemiológica. Se registraron todos los eventos de IACS en la Unidad de Quemados desde el 01/07/2018 hasta el 31/06/2021. Se compararon las tasas de las IACS entre el período I (PI) previo a la pandemia (07/2018-12/2019) y el período II (PII) posterior al inicio de la misma (01/2020- 06/2021). Resultados: se registraron 74 episodios de IACS, en un total de 8232 pacientes-día. Se registró una tasa global de IACS similar en ambos períodos, 10,08 ‰ pacientes-día (PI) vs 7,34 ‰ pacientes-día (PII), sin encontrarse diferencias estadísticamente significativas en las tasas de bacteriemia asociada a catéter venoso central (BSI-CVC) 3,32 ‰ días uso de CVC (PI) vs 3,20 ‰ (PII), neumonía asociada a ARM 1.43 ‰ días de uso de ARM (PI) vs un 2.02 ‰ (PII), ni infección urinaria asociada a sonda vesical (SV) 7,36 ‰ días de uso de SV (PI) vs 3,64 ‰ (PII). Conclusiones: no se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en las tasas de IACS entre ambos períodos, lo cual podría justificarse con el estricto protocolo en control de infecciones implementado previo al inicio de la pandemia (AU)


Introduction: since the start of the Covid19 pandemic, variability in the incidence of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) has been reported. This study was conducted to describe and compare the rates of HAIs in the burn unit of a tertiary pediatric hospital before and after the onset of the pandemic. Material and methods: a retrospective, descriptive, epidemiological surveillance cohort study was conducted. All HAI events in the burn unit from 01/07/2018 to 31/06/2021 were recorded. HAI rates between the pre-pandemic period I (PI) (07/2018- 12/2019) and post-pandemic period II (PII) (01/2020-06/2021) were compared. Results: 74 episodes of HAI were recorded in a total of 8232 patient-days. There was a similar overall rate of HAIs in both periods, 10.08 ‰ patient-days (PI) vs 7.34 ‰ patient-days (PII), with no statistically significant differences found in the rates of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections (CVC-BSI) 3.32 ‰ days CVC use (PI) vs 3.20 ‰ (PII), ventilator-associated pneumonia 1. 43 ‰ days MV use (PI) vs a 2.02 ‰ (PII), or catheter-associated urinary tract infection 7.36 ‰ days catheter use (PI) vs 3.64 ‰ (PII). Conclusions: no statistically significant differences were observed in the rates of HAIs between both periods, which may be explained by the strict infection control protocol implemented prior to the onset of the pandemic (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Burns/complications , Burns/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Infection Control , Epidemiological Monitoring , COVID-19/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies
9.
Am J Surg ; 223(1): 157-163, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34330521

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe the gender-based disparities in burn injury patterns, care received, and mortality across national income levels. METHODS: In the WHO Global Burn Registry (GBR), we compared patient demographics, injury characteristics, care and outcomes by sex using Chi-square statistics. Logistic regression was used to identify the associations of patient sex with surgical treatment and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among 6431 burn patients (38 % female; 62 % male), females less frequently received surgical treatment during index hospitalization (49 % vs 56 %, p < 0.001), and more frequently died in-hospital (26 % vs 16 %, p < 0.001) than males. Odds of in in-hospital death was 2.16 (95 % CI: 1.73-2.71) times higher among females compared to males in middle-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: Across national income levels, there appears to be important gender-based disparities among burn injury epidemiology, treatment received and outcomes that require redress. Multinational registries can be utilized to track and to evaluate initiatives to reduce gender disparities at national, regional and global levels.


Subject(s)
Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Burns/epidemiology , Global Health/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Burns/diagnosis , Burns/surgery , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Global Burden of Disease , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , World Health Organization , Young Adult
10.
Am J Surg ; 223(1): 151-156, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34330520

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Psychological consequences of burn injury can be profound. Acute stress disorder (ASD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are known sequelae, but routine identification is challenging. This study aims to identify patient characteristics associated with outpatient positive screens. METHODS: The Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder questionnaire (PC-PTSD-4) was administered at initial outpatient Burn Center visits between 5/2018-12/2018. Demographics, injury mechanism, and total body surface area (TBSA) were recorded. Those with ≥3 affirmative answers were considered positive. Patients with positive and negative screens were compared. RESULTS: Of 307 surveys collected, 292 (median TBSA 1.5 %, IQR 0.5-4.0 %) remained for analysis after exclusions. Of those, 24.0 % screened positive. Positive screens were associated with presence of a deep component of the injury, injury mechanism, upper extremity involvement, ICU admission, and prolonged hospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous factors distinguish burn injury from other traumatic mechanisms and contribute to disproportionate rates of traumatic stress disorders. Optimization of burn-oriented ASD and PTSD screening protocols can enable earlier intervention.


Subject(s)
Burns/complications , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute/epidemiology , Adult , Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Burns/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatient Clinics, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Acute/psychology
12.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 148(4): 548e-557e, 2021 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34550938

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A model that predicts a patient's risk of developing chronic, burn-related nerve pain may guide medical and/or surgical management. This study determined anatomy-specific variables and constructed a mathematical model to predict a patient's risk of developing burn-related nerve pain. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted from 1862 adults admitted to a burn center from 2014 to 2019. One hundred thirteen patients developed burn-related nerve pain. Comparisons were made using 11 anatomy-specific locations between patients with and without burn-related nerve pain. The modified Delphi technique was used to select 14 potential risk variables. Multivariate regression techniques, Brier scores, area under the curve, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit, and stratified K-fold cross-validation was used for model development. Chronic pain was defined as pain lasting 6 or more months after release from the Burn Center. RESULTS: Prevalence rates of burn-related nerve pain were similar in the development (6.1 percent) and validation (5.4 percent) cohorts [Brier score = 0.15; stratified K-fold cross-validation (K = 10): area under the curve, 0.75; 95 percent CI, 0.68 to 0.81; Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit, p = 0.73; n = 10 groups]. Eight variables were included in the final equation. Burn-related nerve pain risk score = -6.3 + 0.02 (age) + 1.77 (tobacco use) + 1.04 (substance abuse) + 0.67 (alcohol abuse) + 0.84 (upper arm burn) + 1.28 (thigh burn) + 0.21 (number of burn operations) + 0.01 (hospital length-of-stay). Burn-related nerve pain predicted probability = 1 - 1/[1 + exp(burn-related nerve pain risk score)] for 6-month burn-related nerve pain risk score. As the number of risk factors increased, the probability of pain increased. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors were identified for developing burn-related nerve pain at 11 anatomical locations. This model accurately predicts a patient's risk of developing burn-related nerve pain at 6 months. Age, tobacco use, substance abuse, alcohol abuse, upper arm burns, thigh burns, the number of burn operations, and hospital length of stay represented the strongest predictors. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.


Subject(s)
Burns/complications , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Neuralgia/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Chronic Pain/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Statistical , Neuralgia/diagnosis , Neuralgia/etiology , Pain Measurement , Prevalence , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Young Adult
13.
Burns ; 47(7): 1478-1485, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34465508

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The optimal distribution of burn centers remains unclear. We aimed to determine the appropriate number of burn centers per population (density) and examined a nationwide registry with the hypothesis that low-density burn centers would be associated with unfavorable outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using the Japanese Society of Burn Injury registry (2011-2021). Burn center density was defined as the number of burn centers per one million population in each prefecture, and centers were trisected on the basis of density. Hospital-free days until day 30 were compared between patients at high-, middle-, and low-density centers. Inverse probability weighting was conducted to adjust baseline characteristics, including age, burn mechanism, and burn severity. RESULTS: We included 6764, 6209, and 2200 patients at high-, middle-, and low-density burn centers, respectively. After adjusting for patient demographics and burn severity, patients at high- and middle-density centers (≥0.4 centers per one million population) had longer hospital-free days compared with those at low-density centers (11 [0-23] vs 11 [0-23] vs 8 [0-22] days; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Low burn center density (<0.4 centers per one million population) was associated with longer hospital stay, whereas no higher limit was determined.


Subject(s)
Burn Units , Burns , Length of Stay , Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Burns/epidemiology , Burns/therapy , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Registries , Retrospective Studies
14.
Burns ; 47(3): 569-575, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33858714

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the impact of the implementation of a best practice infection prevention and control bundle on healthcare associated burn wound infections in a paediatric burns unit. BACKGROUND: Burn patients are vulnerable to infection. For this patient population, infection is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, thereby representing a significant challenge for burns clinicians who care for them. METHODS: An interrupted time series was used to compare healthcare associated burn wound infections in paediatric burn patients before and after implementation of an infection prevention and control bundle. Prospective surveillance of healthcare associated burn wound infections was conducted from 2012 to 2014. Other potential healthcare associated infection rates were also reviewed over the study period, including urinary tract infections, pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infections and sepsis. An infection prevention and control bundle developed in collaboration between the paediatric burn unit and infection control clinicians was implemented in 2013 in addition to previous standard practice. RESULTS: During the study period a total of 626 patients were admitted to the paediatric burns unit. Healthcare associated burn wound infections reduced from 34 in 2012 to 0 in 2014 following the implementation of the infection prevention and control bundle. Pneumonia and sepsis also reduced to 0 in 2013 and 2014, however one upper respiratory tract infection occurred in 2013 and urinary tract infections persisted in 2013. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an infection prevention and control bundle was effective in reducing healthcare associated burn wound infections, pneumonia and sepsis within our paediatric burns unit. Urinary tract infections remain a challenge for future improvement.


Subject(s)
Burns/complications , Infection Control/instrumentation , Adolescent , Burn Units/organization & administration , Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Burns/epidemiology , Burns/therapy , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/statistics & numerical data , Interrupted Time Series Analysis/methods , Male , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Western Australia/epidemiology , Wound Infection/epidemiology , Wound Infection/etiology , Wound Infection/physiopathology
15.
Burns ; 47(3): 545-550, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33707085

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Accurate resuscitation of pediatric patients with large thermal injury is critical to achieving optimal outcomes. The goal of this project was to describe the degree of variability in resuscitation guidelines among pediatric burn centers and the impact on fluid estimates. METHODS: Five pediatric burn centers in the Pediatric Injury Quality Improvement Collaborative (PIQIC) contributed data from patients with ≥15% total body surface area (TBSA) burns treated from 2014 to 2018. Each center's resuscitation guidelines and guidelines from the American Burn Association were used to calculate estimated 24-h fluid requirements and compare these values to the actual fluid received. RESULTS: Differences in the TBSA burn at which fluid resuscitation was initiated, coefficients related to the Parkland formula, criteria to initiate dextrose containing fluids, and urine output goals were observed. Three of the five centers' resuscitation guidelines produced statistically significant lower mean fluid estimates when compared with the actual mean fluid received for all patients across centers (4.53 versus 6.35ml/kg/% TBSA, p<0.001), (4.90 versus 6.35ml/kg/TBSA, p=0.002) and (3.38 versus 6.35ml/kg/TBSA, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This variation in practice patterns led to statistically significant differences in fluid estimates. One center chose to modify its resuscitation guidelines at the conclusion of this study.


Subject(s)
Fluid Therapy/methods , Resuscitation/trends , Body Surface Area , Burn Units/organization & administration , Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Fluid Therapy/standards , Fluid Therapy/trends , Humans , Infant , Male , Pediatrics/methods , Pediatrics/trends , Resuscitation/methods , Resuscitation/standards , Retrospective Studies
16.
Burns ; 47(7): 1556-1562, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33551265

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically impacted healthcare provision in the UK and burns services have had to adapt to ensure the continuity of a safe care. As we return to "normality" we reflect on lessons learnt from our response to this pandemic. A service evaluation was performed from patient notes between March 23rd and May 8th 2020 and an anonymous survey given to patients attending outpatient appointments. 258 patients were referred to our burns service and 148 patients completed the survey. Eleven burns were caused by treatment or prevention of COVID-19. Patients delayed seeking medical attention due to concern of catching COVID-19 (36% adults, 8% children). There was a delay in referral of 17 patients despite them fulfilling the referral criteria. Infection rates were higher following delayed presentation (21% vs 6%). The majority of burns were managed conservatively (237/258). Dressing changes were performed at home by 32% of patients. The outreach team treated 22 patients. During the pandemic telemedicine has improved the efficiency of outpatient burn care and outreach nurses have enabled treatment of vulnerable patients. More must be done to raise public awareness of preventable causes of burn injury and to reassure them to seek help when burns occur.


Subject(s)
Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Burns , COVID-19/psychology , Infection Control , Adult , Burns/epidemiology , Burns/therapy , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Child , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , United Kingdom/epidemiology
17.
Int Wound J ; 18(3): 367-374, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33350594

ABSTRACT

In this study, it was aimed to investigate the effects of lockdown measures implemented due to COVID-19 on aetiology, sociodemographic characteristics, and clinical status of burn cases. This study was carried out retrospectively at the Burn Unit of Dicle University Medical Faculty Hospital. The burn cases during the COVID-19 outbreak were compared with those of the previous 2 years. Statistical analyses were carried out using the IBM SPSS (Statistics Package for Social Sciences) Statistics 25. Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and Shapiro-Wilk test were used for data evaluation. Results were evaluated at 95% confidence interval and P < .05 significance level. It was determined that burn cases were reduced by half during the COVID-19 compared to the previous 2 years. Despite the increase in the number of third-degree burns and surgeries, it was determined that the length of hospital stay decreased by an average of two thirds. Hot liquids have been identified as the most important cause of burns in all years. New studies should be conducted in order to examine the social dimension of COVID-19 pandemic in burn cases and to prevent these cases completely. The short hospital stay preferred by clinicians after COVID-19 and possible problems that may arise should be investigated.


Subject(s)
Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Burns/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Pandemics , Quarantine/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Turkey/epidemiology , Young Adult
20.
Burns ; 47(3): 721-727, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32943275

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Steam inhalation is common practice in UK households for coryzal symptoms in adults and children. Steam inhalation has the potential to and has caused significant scald injuries, predominantly due to unintentional contact with the hot water used. METHODS: The authors used electronic health records to retrospectively identify all patients admitted with scald injuries secondary to steam inhalation over a 2-year period from January 2018-December 2019 at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, a regional burns centre. Data collected included patient demographics, mechanism of burn, as well as burn size, depth, treatment and any associated complications. An International Burns Injury Database enquiry assessed the national prevalence steam inhalation scalds over the same time period. RESULTS: 19 adult and paediatric patients were identified in our centre over a 2-year period, with an age range of 2 weeks to 91 years old. The majority (16/19, 84%) of patients received burns to their lower body, with three patients receiving burns to their chest and/or upper limbs. Six patients underwent surgery, 98 clinic appointments were utilised and the total length of hospital stay was 83 days. The estimated total cost of treating these 19 patients was over £31,872. Nationally, 201 cases were identified between Jan 2018-Dec 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Scald injuries secondary to steam inhalation have a significant impact both in terms of hospital stay and cost. Since this study captured only patients admitted to hospital, the true negative impact of steam inhalation is likely to be much higher than calculated. Better public awareness on the risks of steam inhalation and primary prevention policies could reduce the frequency of such injuries.


Subject(s)
Burns, Inhalation/etiology , Steam/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Burn Units/organization & administration , Burn Units/statistics & numerical data , Burns, Inhalation/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...