Electrical injuries in children-a 6-year retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the clinical epidemiological characteristics of children with electrical injuries and discuss the countermeasures for the prevention of electrical injuries in children. METHODS: The children with electrical injuries were grouped according to whether or not they were admitted to the hospital for treatment into inpatient and outpatient groups. Clinical data such as gender, causes of injury and injury-causing voltage distribution in different age groups were analyzed. The factors affecting hospitalization were subjected to χ2 test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 321 children were included with 37 divided into inpatient group and 284 divided into outpatient group. The incidence of electrical injuries was highest in children ≤6 years old and in the summer. There were significantly different in gender, place of occurrence, cause of injury and injury-causing voltage between the two groups (p < 0.05). Injury-causing voltage is an independent risk factor affecting hospitalization of children with electrical injuries (OR = 0.116, 95 %CI = 0.040-0.334, p = 0.000). In children ≤6 years old, boys suffered electrical injuries more frequently than girls; battery powered vehicle (47.53 %) was primarily the cause of injury; most of the patients (64.64 %) were exposed to low voltage below 100 Vs, mainly in the case of adolescent children. CONCLUSION: Male preschoolers accounted for the majority of electrical injury cases, and these accidents mostly happened in household electrical appliances and household battery cars. Overall, it is necessary to improve family electrical safety education and reinforce protective measures against electric injury to children.

[Mechanism and prevention and treatment strategy of progressive injury in high-voltage electric burns].

High-voltage electric burn is one of burns that can cause severe damages to tissue and organs. Clinically, progressive injury in high-voltage electric burns is a key pathological change that affects the level of amputation and the success rate of treatment. At present, the exact definition and mechanism of progressive injury in high-voltage electric burns have not been elucidated, and the clinical treatment is mainly symptomatic treatment. Relevant research data on the mechanism and treatment of progressive injury in high-voltage electric burns are lacking. This paper analyzes and summarizes the mechanism, diagnosis, treatment, and common outcome of progressive injury in high-voltage electric burns, and provides a reference for the mechanism research, clinical diagnosis and treatment of progressive injury in high-voltage electric burns.

Power, Lesion Size Index and Oesophageal Temperature Alerts During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: Low radiofrequency powers are commonly used on the posterior wall of the left atrium for atrial fibrillation ablation to prevent esophageal damage. Compared with higher powers, they require longer ablation durations to achieve a target lesion size index (LSI). Esophageal heating during ablation is the result of a time-dependent process of conductive heating produced by nearby radiofrequency delivery. This randomized study was conducted to compare risk of esophageal heating and acute procedure success of different LSI-guided ablation protocols combining higher or lower radiofrequency power and different target LSI values. METHODS: Eighty consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled and randomized to one of 4 combinations of radiofrequency power and target LSI for ablation on the left atrium posterior wall (20 W/LSI 4, 20 W/LSI 5, 40 W/LSI 4, and 40 W/LSI 5). The primary end point of the study was the occurrence and number of esophageal temperature alerts per patient during ablation. Acute indicators of procedure success were considered as secondary end points. Long-term follow-up data were also collected for all patients. RESULTS: Esophageal temperature alerts occurred in a similar proportion of patients in all groups. Significantly, shorter radiofrequency durations were required to achieve the target LSI in the 40 W groups. Less than 50% of the radiofrequency lesions reached the target LSI of 5 when using 20 W despite a longer radiofrequency duration. A lower rate of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation and a higher rate of acute pulmonary vein reconnection were recorded in the group 20 W/LSI 5. A lower atrial fibrillation recurrence rate was observed in the 40 W groups compared with the 20 W groups at 29 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: When guided by LSI, posterior wall ablation with 40 W is associated with a similar rate of esophageal temperature alerts and a lower atrial fibrillation recurrence rate at follow-up if compared with 20 W. These data will provide a basis to plan future randomized trials. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02619396.

Esophageal injury associated with catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: Determinants of risk and protective strategies.

Catheter ablation has become an important element in the management of atrial fibrillation. Several technical advances allowed for better safety profiles and lower recurrence rates, leading to an increasing number of ablations worldwide. Despite that, major complications are still reported, and esophageal thermal injury remains a significant concern as atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) is often fatal. Recognition of the mechanisms involved in the process of esophageal lesion formation and the identification of the main determinants of risk have set the grounds for the development and improvement of different esophageal protective strategies. More sensitive esophageal temperature monitoring, safer ablation parameters and catheters, and different energy sources appear to collectively reduce the risk of esophageal thermal injury. Adjunctive measures such as the prophylactic use of proton-pump inhibitors, as well as esophageal cooling or deviation devices, have emerged as complementary methods with variable but promising results. Nevertheless, as a multifactorial problem, no single esophageal protective measure has proven to be sufficiently effective to eliminate the risk, and further investigation is still warranted. Early screening in the patients at risk and prompt intervention in the cases of AEF are important risk modifiers and yield better outcomes.

Use of electrosurgical units in the endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal tumors.

Electrosurgical units (ESUs) are indispensable devices in our endoscopy units. However, many endoscopists are not well-trained on their use and their physical bases are usually not properly studied or understood. In addition, comparative data concerning the settings that may be applied in different circumstances are scarce in the medical literature. Given that it is important to be aware of their strengths and risks, we conducted a review of the available information and research on this topic.

Electrical Burns During Fruit Harvesting.

Electrocutions during tree trimming or fruit harvesting are occasionally reported in the public media, but the actual incidence is unknown. Some fruit trees (eg, mango and avocado) can exceed 30 feet, with dense foliage concealing the fruit and overlying power lines so burns associated with harvesting these fruits are often exacerbated with falls. However, there are limited data on this subject. To fill this gap, we provide some of the first information on this unique injury pattern. All electrocutions from 2013 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed at an ABA-verified burn center. Demographics, injury patterns, and complications were analyzed. Of 97 electrocutions, 22 (23%) were associated with fruit procurement. This population was aged 43 ± 14 years, 95% (n = 21) male, injury severity score of 15 ± 13, and total body surface area burned 4% [1%-9%]. Third-degree burns were present in 36% (n = 8). ICU admission was required in 59% (n = 13) and 39% of the survivors required operative interventions for the burn. Compartment syndrome occurred in 18% (n = 4) and 14% (n = 3) patients required amputations. Falls complicated the care in 50% (n = 11), with associated head, chest, and/or extremity trauma. Mortality was 32% (n = 7), with three patients presenting dead on arrival. All but 3 injuries occurred between June and December, coinciding with mango and avocado season. Electrocution during fruit picking is a seasonal injury often exacerbated by falls. Management is challenging, and favorable outcome depends on recognition of the complexity of the polytrauma.

Low complication rates using high power (45-50 W) for short duration for atrial fibrillation ablations.

BACKGROUND: Many centers use radiofrequency (RF) energy at 25-35 W for 30-60 seconds. There is a safety concern about using higher power, especially on the posterior wall. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine complication rates for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablations performed with high-power, short-duration RF energy. METHODS: We examined the complication rates of 4 experienced centers performing AF ablations at RF powers from 45-50 W for 2-15 seconds per lesion. In total, 13,974 ablations were performed in 10,284 patients. On the posterior wall, 11,436 ablations used 45-50 W for 2-10 seconds, and 2538 ablations used power reduced to 35 W for 20 seconds. Esophageal temperature monitoring was used in 13,858 (99.2%). RESULTS: Demographics were age 64 ± 11 years, male 68%, left atrial size 4.4 ± 0.7 cm, paroxysmal AF 37%, persistent AF 42%, longstanding AF 20%, antiarrhythmic drugs failed 1.4 ± 0.7, hypertension 54%, diabetes 15%, previous cerebrovascular accident/transient ischemic attack 7%, and CHA2DS2-VASc score 2.1 ± 1.4. Procedural time was 116 ± 41 minutes. Complications were death in 2 (0.014%; 1 due to stroke and 1 due to atrioesophageal fistula), pericardial tamponade in 33 (0.24%; 26 tapped, 7 surgical), strokes <48 hours in 6 (0.043%), strokes 48 hours-30 days in 6 (0.043%), pulmonary vein stenosis requiring intervention in 2 (0.014%), phrenic nerve paralysis in 2 (0.014%; both resolved), steam pops 2 (0.014%) without complications, and catheter char 0 (0.00%). There was 1 atrioesophageal fistula in 11,436 ablations using power 45-50 W on the posterior wall and 3 in 2538 ablated with 35 W on the posterior wall (P = .021), although 2 of the 3 had no esophageal monitoring during a fluoroless procedure. CONCLUSION: AF ablations can be performed at 45-50 W for short durations with very low complication rates. High-power, short-duration ablations have the potential to shorten procedural and total RF times and create more localized and durable lesions.

Luminal esophageal temperature monitoring to reduce esophageal thermal injury during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: A review.

Over the past decade, catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation has emerged as an important rhythm control strategy. One of the most dreaded complications of this procedure is atrio-esophageal (AE) fistula formation, which is relatively rare but usually fatal. Esophageal tissue injury during ablation appears to be a precursor to the formation of AE fistulae. Luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring is one of the most commonly utilized strategies to mitigate this risk, despite little evidence that it reduces esophageal injury. The incidence of AE fistulae appears to be on the rise, despite the widespread use of LET monitoring. This may be due to the advent of improved large lesion technology including force-sensing catheters and the use of high power, although AE fistulae have also been observed with the use of low power along the left atrial posterior wall. Currently available discrete sensors probes, whether single or multiple, do not appear to significantly reduce injury rates. The purpose of this manuscript is to systematically review the incidence of esophageal thermal injury with and without LET monitoring and review the factors that may be associated with increased risk of injury.

Epidemiologic shifts for burn injury in Ethiopia from 2001 to 2016: Implications for public health measures.

BACKGROUND: The last generation has seen Ethiopia, a low income country with a population of 100 million people, undergo a marked increase in urbanization and development. The effects of these demographic changes on the epidemiology of burn risk and thermal injury in Ethiopia are unknown. This gap constitutes a major barrier to the creation of effective burn prevention programs. METHODS: Yekatit 12 Hospital in Addis Ababa is the only burn unit in Ethiopia. In this cross sectional retrospective study, we identified and reviewed all admissions due to burn injury at that facility between 1/1/2016 and 12/31/2016. We then compared them to a previously published burn cohort treated at the same facility between 7/1/2001 and 9/31/2002. Chi square was used to compare proportions between the two samples. Continuous covariates are reported as descriptive data due to missing variance data in the 2001-02 publication. RESULTS: There were a total of 121 subjects in the 2001-02 sample and 176 subjects in the 2016 sample. The 2016 sample was found to have a significantly larger proportion of males (57%) as compared to the 2001-02 sample (36%) (p=0.0003) and a significantly higher proportion of electrical injuries (27%) than the previous cohort (5%) (p<0.0001). No significant differences were seen in mortality rates between the 2016 and 2001-02 cohorts (8% vs 12%, respectively, p=0.29) or in the regions of origin (44% outside Addis Ababa vs 54%, p=0.09) For the 2016 sample, the highest surviving Baux score was 76 while the mean Baux score for survivors was 29.6±20.11. CONCLUSION: As Ethiopia has become more industrialized over the last 15 years, the demographic pattern of burn injury has changed accordingly as electrical injuries have increased five-fold with males now constituting a majority of burn cases.

[Prevention and treatment of electrical burn injury: much progresses achieved yet further efforts still needed].

Electrical burn injury is very common, including electrical contact burn, electrical arc burn, and lightning burn, etc. Electrical burn patients account for 0.04 to 5 percent of all burn victims in the developed countries, while it hit up to 27 percent in the developing countries, much more than the global average of 4.5 percent. Historical and recent data have shown that the electrical burn injuries in China, either for the case number, the proportion of burn patients in hospital, or the population incidence per year, are much higher than those of the developed countries and the global average. Before the 1960s, conservative treatment or skin grafts after repeated debridements were used for electrical burns, resulting in high rates of amputation and severe deformity. In the 1960s, transplantation of flaps after debridement in early stage were used for repairing wrist electrical burn wounds, breaking through the traditional conservative methods. In the 1980s, local, distant and island pedicled skin or myocutaneous flaps were widely used for early stage repair of electrical burn wounds. In recent years, along with the increasing experience of evaluating the blood vessel injuries and the development of microsurgical techniques, free flaps have been more and more used to cover the deep wounds of electrical burns in early stage, leading to much better effects and shorter length of hospital stay. With the persistent efforts of the burn specialists in the last decades, great improvements have been made for the treatment of electrical burn injuries in China. Future study on decoding the full mechanism of electrical burn injury, exploring new methods to save the injured but not yet necrotic tissue, are still needed to improve the treatment and reduce amputation and deformity of electrical burn injury.

Hand-to-hand coupling and strategies to minimize unintentional energy transfer during laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Energy-based devices are used in nearly every laparoscopic operation. Radiofrequency energy can transfer to nearby instruments via antenna and capacitive coupling without direct contact. Previous studies have described inadvertent energy transfer through bundled cords and nonelectrically active wires. The purpose of this study was to describe a new mechanism of stray energy transfer from the monopolar instrument through the operating surgeon to the laparoscopic telescope and propose practical measures to decrease the risk of injury. METHODS: Radiofrequency energy was delivered to a laparoscopic L-hook (monopolar "bovie"), an advanced bipolar device, and an ultrasonic device in a laparoscopic simulator. The tip of a 10-mm telescope was placed adjacent but not touching bovine liver in a standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy setup. Temperature increase was measured as tissue temperature from baseline nearest the tip of the telescope which was never in contact with the energy-based device after a 5-s open-air activation. RESULTS: The monopolar L-hook increased tissue temperature adjacent to the camera/telescope tip by 47 ± 8°C from baseline (P < 0.001). By having an assistant surgeon hold the camera/telescope (rather than one surgeon holding both the active electrode and the camera/telescope), temperature change was reduced to 26 ± 7°C (P < 0.001). Alternative energy devices significantly reduced temperature change in comparison to the monopolar instrument (47 ± 8°C) for both the advanced bipolar (1.2 ± 0.5°C; P < 0.001) and ultrasonic (0.6 ± 0.3°C; P < 0.001) devices. CONCLUSIONS: Stray energy transfers from the monopolar "bovie" instrument through the operating surgeon to standard electrically inactive laparoscopic instruments. Hand-to-hand coupling describes a new form of capacitive coupling where the surgeon's body acts as an electrical conductor to transmit energy. Strategies to reduce stray energy transfer include avoiding the same surgeon holding the active electrode and laparoscopic camera or using alternative energy devices.

Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) in humans, encompassing transcranial direct current (tDCS), transcutaneous spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS), transcranial alternating current (tACS), and transcranial random noise (tRNS) stimulation or their combinations, appears to be safe. No serious adverse events (SAEs) have been reported so far in over 18,000 sessions administered to healthy subjects, neurological and psychiatric patients, as summarized here. Moderate adverse events (AEs), as defined by the necessity to intervene, are rare, and include skin burns with tDCS due to suboptimal electrode-skin contact. Very rarely mania or hypomania was induced in patients with depression (11 documented cases), yet a causal relationship is difficult to prove because of the low incidence rate and limited numbers of subjects in controlled trials. Mild AEs (MAEs) include headache and fatigue following stimulation as well as prickling and burning sensations occurring during tDCS at peak-to-baseline intensities of 1-2mA and during tACS at higher peak-to-peak intensities above 2mA. The prevalence of published AEs is different in studies specifically assessing AEs vs. those not assessing them, being higher in the former. AEs are frequently reported by individuals receiving placebo stimulation. The profile of AEs in terms of frequency, magnitude and type is comparable in healthy and clinical populations, and this is also the case for more vulnerable populations, such as children, elderly persons, or pregnant women. Combined interventions (e.g., co-application of drugs, electrophysiological measurements, neuroimaging) were not associated with further safety issues. Safety is established for low-intensity 'conventional' TES defined as <4mA, up to 60min duration per day. Animal studies and modeling evidence indicate that brain injury could occur at predicted current densities in the brain of 6.3-13A/m2 that are over an order of magnitude above those produced by tDCS in humans. Using AC stimulation fewer AEs were reported compared to DC. In specific paradigms with amplitudes of up to 10mA, frequencies in the kHz range appear to be safe. In this paper we provide structured interviews and recommend their use in future controlled studies, in particular when trying to extend the parameters applied. We also discuss recent regulatory issues, reporting practices and ethical issues. These recommendations achieved consensus in a meeting, which took place in Göttingen, Germany, on September 6-7, 2016 and were refined thereafter by email correspondence.

Guideline Implementation: Energy-Generating Devices, Part 1-Electrosurgery.

Energy-generating devices are standard equipment in the surgical suite, with electrosurgical units being the most common type of electrical device used in the OR. Prevention of injuries to patients and personnel related to the use of energy-generating devices is a key component of the perioperative nurse's role. The AORN "Guideline for safe use of energy-generating devices" provides guidance on the use and maintenance of devices that deliver energy in the forms of radiofrequency waves, ultrasound waves, or lasers. This article focuses on key points of the guideline, which address precautions specific to electrosurgical units, patients with implanted electronic devices, and minimally invasive surgery, and documentation of the use of energy-generating devices. Perioperative RNs should review the complete guideline for additional information and for guidance when writing and updating policies and procedures.

The Importance of Arc Flash Mitigation.

De-energizing equipment does not absolve the facility from the responsibility of performing an arc flash analysis or providing the necessary PPE.

Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices: focus on contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging protocols.

AIMS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been reported to be safe in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) provided a specific protocol is followed. The objective of this study was to assess whether this is also true for patients excluded from published protocols. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 160 MRIs were obtained in 142 consecutive patients with CIEDs [106 patients had an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and 36 had a pacemaker implanted] using an adapted, pre-specified protocol. A cardiac MRI was performed in 95 patients, and a spinal/brain MRI was performed in 47 patients. Forty-six patients (32%) had either abandoned leads (n = 10), and/or were pacemaker dependent with an implanted ICD (n = 19), had recently implanted CIEDs (n = 1), and/or had a CIED device with battery depletion (n = 2), and/or a component of the CIED was recalled or on advisory (n = 32). No major complications occurred. Some device parameters changed slightly, but significantly, right after or at 1-week post-MRI without requiring any reprogramming. In one patient with an ICD on advisory, the pacing rate changed inexplicably during one of his two MRIs from 90 to 50 b.p.m. CONCLUSION: Using a pre-specified protocol, cardiac and non-cardiac MRIs were performed in CIED patients with pacemaker dependency, abandoned leads, or depleted batteries without occurrence of major adverse events. Patients with devices on advisory need to be monitored carefully during MRI, especially if they are pacemaker dependent.