Effectiveness of Butorphanol in alleviating intra- and post-operative visceral pain following microwave ablation for hepatic tumor: a dual-central, randomized, controlled trial.

Many patients who underwent hepatic percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) reported experiencing pain during the procedure. This study utilized a well-designed multicentral, randomized, and placebo-controlled format to investigate the effects of Butorphanol. Patients who underwent MWA were randomly assigned to either Butorphanol or normal saline group. The primary outcomes of the study were assessed by measuring the patients' intraoperative pain levels using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included measuring postoperative pain levels at the 6-h mark (VAS) and evaluating comprehensive pain assessment outcomes. A total of 300 patients were divided between the control group (n = 100) and the experimental group (n = 200). Butorphanol showed statistically significant reductions in intraoperative pain levels compared to the placebo during surgery (5.00 ± 1.46 vs. 3.54 ± 1.67, P < 0.001). Significant differences were observed in postoperative pain levels at the 6-h mark and in the overall assessment of pain (1.39 + 1.21 vs. 0.65 + 0.81, P < 0.001). Butorphanol had a significant impact on reducing the heart rate of patients. The empirical evidence supports the effectiveness of Butorphanol in reducing the occurrence of visceral postoperative pain in patients undergoing microwave ablation for hepatic tumor. Furthermore, the study found no noticeable impact on circulatory and respiratory dynamics.

Pre-emptive infiltration with betamethasone and ropivacaine for postoperative pain in laminoplasty and laminectomy (PRE-EASE): a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain after laminoplasty and laminectomy occurs partially from local trauma of the paraspinal tissue. Finding a multimodal analgesic cocktail to enhance the duration and effect of local infiltration analgesia is crucial. Because of the rapid onset and long duration of action of betamethasone, the authors hypothesized that, a pre-emptive multimodal infiltration regimen of betamethasone and ropivacaine reduces pain scores and opioid demand, and improves patient satisfaction following laminoplasty and laminectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint study was conducted between 1 September 2021 and 3 June 2022, and included patients between the ages of 18 and 64 scheduled for elective laminoplasty or laminectomy under general anesthesia, with American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I/II. One hundred sixteen patients were randomly assigned to either the BR (Betamethasone-Ropivacaine) group or the R (Ropivacaine) group in a 1:1 ratio. Each group received pre-emptive infiltration of a total of 10 ml study solution into each level. Every 30 ml of study solution composed of 0.5 ml of betamethasone plus 14.5 ml of saline and 15 ml of 1% ropivacaine for the BR group, and 15 ml of 1% ropivacaine added to 15 ml of saline for the R group. Infiltration of epidural space and intrathecal space were avoided and the spinous process, transverse process, facet joints, and lamina were injected, along with paravertebral muscles and subcutaneous tissue. Cumulative 48 h postoperative butorphanol consumption via PCA (Patient-controlled analgesia) was the primary outcome. Intention-to-treat (ITT) principle was used for primary analysis. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were identical in both groups ( P >0.05). The cumulative 48 h postoperative butorphanol consumption via PCA was 3.0±1.4 mg in the BR group ( n =58), and 7.1±1.2 mg in the R group ( n =58) ( P <0.001). Overall cumulative opioid demand was lower at different time intervals in the BR group ( P <0.001), along with the estimated median time of first analgesia demand via PCA (3.3 h in the BR group and 1.6 h in the R group). The visual analog scale (VAS) score at movement and rest were also significantly lower until 3 months and 6 weeks, respectively. No side effects or adverse events associated with the intervention were observed in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-emptive analgesia with betamethasone and ropivacaine provides better postoperative pain management following laminoplasty and laminectomy, compared to ropivacaine alone. This is an effective technique worthy of further evaluation.

Application of Butorphanol versus Sufentanil in Multimode Analgesia via Patient Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Hepatobiliary Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: We investigate the efficacy and safety of butorphanol in multimodal analgesia combined with dexmedetomidine and ketorolac via patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after hepatobiliary surgery, as compared with sufentanil. Patients and Methods: Postoperative follow-up data of hepatobiliary surgery patients in Henan Provincial People's Hospital from March 2018 to June 2021 were collected retrospectively and divided into butorphanol group (group B) or sufentanil group (group S) according to the postoperative intravenous controlled analgesia scheme. The baseline characteristics and surgical information of the two groups were matched through propensity score matching (PSM). Results: A total of 3437 patients were screened, and PSM yielded 1816 patients after matching, including 908 in the butorphanol group and 908 in the sufentanil group. Compared with group S, the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain on the first postoperative day and the second postoperative day was lower in group B during rest (3.2% vs 10.9%, P<0.001; 1.2% vs 4.6%, P<0.001), and during movement (7.0% vs 18.9%, P<0.001; 2.6% vs 8.7%, P<0.001). Patients receiving butorphanol had a lower morphine consumption (50mg vs 120mg, P<0.001). The bolus attempts of an analgesic pump in group B were significantly lower than in group S (1 vs 2, P<0.001). Postoperative hospital length of stay was shortened in group B (11d vs 12d, P=0.017). The occurrence of postoperative vomiting was lower in group B (1.4% vs 3.0%, P=0.025) than in group S. However, more patients in group B experienced dizziness (0.9% vs 0.1%, P=0.019). Conclusion: Compared with sufentanil, the application of butorphanol in multimodal analgesia combined with dexmedetomidine and ketorolac via PCIA ameliorated postoperative pain after hepatobiliary surgery, with reduced opioid consumption and shorter postoperative hospital length of stay.

Standing sedation management of a domesticated reindeer for third eyelid removal.

Background: Reindeer are becoming popular animals within petting farms. Few case reports describe the sedation of domesticated reindeer, but none describe the use of ocular local anesthetic blocks in this species. Case Description: A 9-year-old, female, Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) presenting for removal of a squamous cell carcinoma involving the third eyelid. Standing sedation was performed using initial boluses of medetomidine and butorphanol via intramuscular injection before catheter placement and maintenance with a variable rate infusion of medetomidine. Supraorbital, auriculopalpebral, infratrochlear blocks and local infiltration of the base of the third eyelid were performed using mepivacaine. Following the surgical removal of the third eyelid, atipamazole was administered intramuscularly to antagonize the effects of medetomidine. The patient recovered without complications. Conclusion: Medetomidine-butorphanol in combination with local anesthetic blocks provided a sufficient plane of sedation and analgesia for extra ocular surgery in a domesticated reindeer.

Epidural lidocaine, butorphanol, and butorphanol - lidocaine combination in dromedary camels.

BACKGROUND: The use of general anesthesia in dromedary camels is constrained by risks related to decubitus. Caudal epidural analgesia is an alternative convenient technique providing loco-regional analgesia for numerous invasive and noninvasive painful conditions. Lidocaine is probably the most commonly used local anesthetic in clinical practice, but has a relatively short duration and may not provide significant long term analgesic benefits. Epidural administration of an opioid-local anesthetic mixture would improve the quality and length of analgesia and minimizes the adverse motor effects provoked by local anesthetics. Butorphanol (potent agonist-antagonist opioid) has been used to improve the duration of epidural analgesia in some animal species, but not in camels. Therefore, our purpose was to investigate the onset and duration of analgesia as well as the clinical and hemato-biochemical effects produced by the epidural administration of butorphanol (0.04 mg/kg), lidocaine (0.22 mg/ kg), and butorphanol-lidocaine (0.04 mg/kg-0.22 mg/ kg) mixture in nine adult dromedary camels in a crossover experimental study. RESULTS: The onset of analgesia was not statistically different between lidocaine (6.5 ± 2.3 min) and butorphanol-lidocaine (7.3 ± 1.5 min) combination. Delayed onset of analgesia was reported after butorphanol administration (14.7 ± 3.5 min). Butorphanol-lidocaine combination produced marked longer duration (175 ± 8.7 min) than lidocaine (55 ± 6.8 min) and butorphanol (158 ± 5.3 min). Mild ataxia was observed in the butorphanol-lidocaine and lidocaine treated animals and slight sedation was reported after butorphanol and butorphanol-lidocaine administration. A transient significant increase in the glucose levels was recorded after all treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural administration of butorphanol augments the analgesic effects and duration of lidocaine with minimal adverse effects.

Comparison of the ED50 of prophylactic butorphanol in preventing morphine-induced pruritus with or without palonosetron: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized dose-response trial using an up-down sequential allocation method.

BACKGROUND: Butorphanol has been used to reduce the incidence and severity of neuraxial morphine-induced pruritus. Palonosetron is a commonly used antiemetic for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The aim of our study was to compare the effective dose in 50% of subjects (ED50) of intravenous butorphanol infusion with or without a single intravenous bolus of palonosetron for preventing pruritus induced by epidural administration of morphine. METHODS: A total of 120 parturients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous bolus injection of palonosetron plus continuous infusion of butorphanol (Group P + B) or an intravenous bolus of saline plus continuous infusion of butorphanol (Group B) after epidural administration of morphine. The antipruritic effect was graded as satisfactory (numerical rating scale (NRS) of pruritus ≤3) or unsatisfactory (NRS >3) within 48 h after morphine treatment. The first patient in each group received butorphanol infusion at a rate of 4 µg/kg/h. The infusion dose for each subsequent patient in the corresponding group was increased by 0.2 µg/kg/h after an unsatisfactory response or decreased by 0.2 µg/kg/h after a satisfactory response. The ED50 was calculated for each group and compared using up-down sequential analysis. RESULTS: The ED50 (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)]) of the dose of intravenous butorphanol infusion for preventing moderate to severe pruritus was lower in Group P + B (3.29 µg/kg/min [3.25-3.34 µg/kg/min]) than in Group B (3.57 µg/kg/min [3.47-3.67 µg/kg/min]) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of the present study, a prophylactic use of 0.25 mg palonosetron reduced the ED50 of prophylactic infusion of butorphanol by approximately 8% to achieve a satisfactory antipruritic effect after epidural morphine for post-caesarean analgesia.

Analgesic effect of butorphanol tartrate combined with hydromorphone on patients with cesarean section: A prospective cohort study.

To evaluate the analgesic effect of butorphanol tartrate combined with hydromorphone on the patients with cesarean section, we conducted a prospective cohort study. A total of 90 patients were given patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) with hydromorphone for 24 hours after the cesarean section. After stopping PCIA, they were divided into 2 groups randomly. The cases treated with butorphanol tartrate intravenous drip were evaluated as the butorphanol group (n = 45) and the cases treated with saline were evaluated as the control group (n = 45). We compared the vital signs, analgesic effect, adverse reactions, the bladder and gastrointestinal function recovery, and neonatal jaundice between the 2 groups. The visual analog score in butorphanol group was significantly lower than that of control group at 3 and 4 hours after stopping PCIA (P < .05), but there was no significant difference in visual analog score at 6 and 12 hours after stopping PCIA. The first time of getting out of bed and urination in butorphanol group was significantly later than that in control group while there was no significant difference in the first anal ventilation and the neonatal jaundice index between the 2 groups. We should pay attention to the pain of patients with cesarean section after stopping PCIA. The combination of butorphanol tartrate and hydromorphone play a good effect to relieve the pain while nursing care should be strengthened to urge patients to take early activities to reduce the occurrence of urinary retention.

Analgesic outcomes of tramadol alone and in combination with Butorphanol or Flurbiprofen Axetil after cesarean section: a retrospective study with propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology recommends a multimodal analgesia regimen for cesarean delivery analgesia. This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of tramadol alone and combined with butorphanol or flurbiprofen axetil after a cesarean section. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis based on the electronic medical records of a teaching hospital in China from January 2018 to January 2020. We collected data on demographic characteristics, anesthesia, analgesia strategy, and pain intensity postoperatively during the first 48 hours. Inadequate postoperative analgesia during this period was defined as an NRS score ≥ 4. We also collected data regarding off-bed activity and intestinal function recovery. Participants were classified into three groups according to analgesia regimens. Groups T, TF, and TB received tramadol, a mixture of tramadol and flurbiprofen axetil, and a combination of tramadol and butorphanol, respectively. Analgesic outcomes were compared using propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS: Data from 2323 cases of caesarean section were included in the analysis, and 521 pairs were matched in each group according to their propensity score. Compared with group T, The inadequate analgesia on pain at rest and pain at movement was lower in group TF (RR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.36-0.49, P = 0.001 and RR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.48-0.69, P < 0.001, respectively),and the incidence of inadequate control of pain at movement was higher in group TB (RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.22-1.55, P < 0.001). Additionally, the percentage of off-bed activity at 2 days postoperatively was higher in group TB than in groups TF and T (78.7% vs. 68.5 and 78.7% vs. 64.9%, respectively, P < 0.001). The incidence of intestinal function recovery 2 days after cesarean delivery in group TB was higher than that in group TF (73.3% vs. 66.2%, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Combining tramadol and flurbiprofen axetil could enhance the analgesic effect and be safely used for analgesia after a cesarean section. However, combining tramadol and butorphanol may produce an antagonistic effect.

Analgesic efficacy of butorphanol combined with sufentanil after heart valve surgery: A propensity score-matching analysis.

Pain is common after heart valve surgery and can stimulate the sympathetic nervous system, causing hemodynamic instability and respiratory complications. Current treatments for postoperative pain are insufficient, and postoperative pain is difficult to control effectively with a single analgesic. Therefore, we investigated the analgesic efficacy of butorphanol with sufentanil after heart valve surgery and its hemodynamic effects. The records of 221 patients admitted to the intensive care unit after cardiac valve replacement between January 1, 2018, and May 31, 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were allocated to 2 groups based on the postoperative pain treatment they received: treatment group (administered butorphanol combined with sufentanil), and control group (administered conventional sufentanil analgesia). After propensity score matching for sex, age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, type of valve surgery, and operation duration, 76 patients were included in the study, and analgesic efficacy, hemodynamic changes, and adverse drug reactions were compared between the 2 groups. After propensity score matching, the baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. The histogram and jitter plot of the propensity score distribution indicated good matching. No significant differences were observed in the duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of stay in the intensive care unit, duration of total hospital stay, and hospitalization expenditure between the groups (P > .05). The treatment group had notably higher minimum systolic blood pressure (P = .024) and lower heart rate variability (P = .049) than those in the control group. Moreover, the treatment group exhibited better analgesic efficacy and had lower critical-care pain observation tool scores and consumption of sufentanil 24 hours after surgery than the control group (P < .05). The incidence of vomiting was notably lower in the treatment than in the control group (P = .028). Butorphanol combined with sufentanil can be used in patients after heart valve replacement. This combined treatment has good analgesic efficacy and is associated with reduced adverse drug reactions and, potentially, steady hemodynamics.

Butorphanol as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Adductor Canal Blocks in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Randomized, Double, Blind Study.

Background: The objective of this study was to observe the effects of butorphanol as an adjuvant to ropivacaine for the adductor canal block (ACB) on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: Seventy-four patients undergoing TKA were included and randomly divided into two groups: Group BR received 20 ml of 0.33% ropivacaine plus 1 mg butorphanol and Group R received 20 ml of 0.33% ropivacaine plus 1 ml normal saline for ultrasound-guided adductor canal blocks. The primary outcomes were the duration of the sensory block and the pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and secondary outcomes included the number of PCIA attempts (patient-controlled intravenous analgesia) and the time to first pressing and rescue analgesia. Other outcomes included knee active range of motion (ROM), quadriceps strength, the time to first mobilization, the duration of postoperative hospital stay, Knee Society Score (KSS), and postoperative complications. Results: Since two patients in each group rejected postoperative assessments, 35 patients were included in each group. Compared with Group R, Group BR had longer duration of sensory blocks (18.42 ± 3.46 vs. 15.36 ± 2.29 h, p < 0.01) and lower postoperative pain scores within 24 hours at rest and within 12 hours with activity (p < 0.01). The number of PCIA attempts decreased within 48 hours after surgery (4.5 ± 1.2 vs. 7.8 ± 1.5 times, p < 0.01), and the time to first pressing was later (20.31 ± 2.59 vs. 16.25 ± 2.31 h, p < 0.01). In addition, Group BR had bigger knee ROM at within 24 hours after the operation than Group R (68.37 ± 4.70°vs. 59.21 ± 6.41,85.67 ± 5.17 vs. 74.37 ± 4.68°, 97.62 ± 5.43 vs. 84.18 ± 4.49°, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05) in terms of rescue analgesia, quadriceps strength, the time to first mobilization, the duration of postoperative hospital stay, the KSS function scores, and postoperative complications. Conclusions: Butorphanol plus ropivacaine ultrasound-guided adductor canal block can prolong the duration of sensory block, relieve early postoperative pain, and improve the range of motion of the knee joint, without affecting the occurrence of postoperative complications. Name of the Registry. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. Trial Registration Number. ChiCTR2100041859. URL of Trial Registry Record. http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=119731&htm=4. Date of Registration. 08/01/2021 0:00:00.

Butorphanol inhibits angiogenesis and migration of hepatocellular carcinoma and regulates MAPK pathway.

Butorphanol, a synthetic opioid, exerts analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects against pathogenic diseases. Butorphanol repressed malignant behaviors of tumor cells. In this study, the role of butorphanol in hepatocellular carcinoma was evaluated. Firstly, hepatocellular carcinoma cells were treated with butorphanol. The results showed that butorphanol decreased cell viability of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cell proliferation and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells were inhibited by butorphanol. Secondly, butorphanol suppressed angiogenesis, and reduced phosphorylation levels of p38 and JNK in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Thirdly, butorphanol reduced in vivo tumor growth of hepatocellular carcinoma in nude mice. Butorphanol reduced tumor micro-vascular density (MVD) and repressed lung metastasis. In conclusion, butorphanol exerted anti-angiogenic and anti-metastatic effects on hepatocellular carcinoma and induced inactivation of MAPKs signaling.

Study of ultrasound-guided ropivacaine combined with butorphanol continuous paravertebral block to prevent pain syndrome by evaluating ccl2 gene expression after radical mastectomy.

This study aimed to investigate the clinical effect of ultrasound-guided ropivacaine combined with butorphanol continuous paravertebral block in preventing postoperative pain syndrome of breast cancer. For this purpose, 100 women treated for breast cancer from April 2018 to July 2019 were enrolled as research objects. Surgical procedures included local sentinel lymph node biopsy, mastectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy for mastectomy, modified radical mastectomy, and implantation. The selected patients were randomly divided into two groups: control group (routine operation anesthesia; n = 50) and observation group (ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block before induction of ropivacaine+butorphanol anesthesia; n = 50). The Real-time PCR technique was performed to evaluate CCL2 gene expression. VAS scores were recorded during the postoperative period. Compared with the control group, the observation group had lower VAS scores at six h, 24h, and 48h (P<0.05). The pain effect of the observation group was less than that of the control group. The observation group had better analgesic effects after anesthesia. The observation group had a lower incidence of pain syndrome at the 6th, 8th, and 12th months (P<0.05), and the incidence of pain syndrome in the two groups decreased with the extension of time. The observation group had lower levels of related factors (P<0.05), and the observation group had lower traumatic stress responses. The protein expression of IL-6, IL-17, and CRP in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The results of CCL2 gene expression also showed that gene expression in the control group increased significantly (P=0.0047). Since the expression of this gene is one of the factors that stimulate pain signals in the body, the method used in the present study was able to reduce the amount of pain significantly. Therefore, the combination of ropivacaine combined with butorphanol ultrasound-assisted paravertebral block can reduce the intensity of postoperative pain in patients with breast cancer surgery, decrease the incidence of pain syndrome, and increase pain tolerance.

Sedation quality of alfaxalone associated with butorphanol, methadone or pethidine in cats injected into the supraspinatus or the quadriceps muscle.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the quality of sedation with three different anaesthetic protocols (alfaxalone combined with butorphanol, methadone or pethidine) administered intramuscularly in cats, and to evaluate the influence of the injection site (between supraspinatus and quadriceps muscles) on the onset and quality of sedation. METHODS: A total of 151 cats were selected for this study. Cats were sedated with alfaxalone (3 mg/kg) combined with either butorphanol (0.3 mg/kg; n = 50), methadone (0.3 mg/kg; n = 53) or pethidine (5 mg/kg; n = 48). The combination was injected intramuscularly into the supraspinatus (n = 79) or quadriceps muscle (n = 72). The data included a scoring system for the quality of sedation and physiological parameters, such as heart rate (HR), respiratory rate, body temperature and occurrence of mydriasis, monitored during the first 30 mins of anaesthesia. RESULTS: The opioid associated with alfaxalone influenced the overall sedation score, the degree of myorelaxation, the occurrence of mydriasis and HR. The overall sedation score was poorer with butorphanol than with methadone (P = 0.008), and butorphanol induced a lower degree of myorelaxation than methadone (P = 0.013). The injection into the supraspinatus showed better qualitative results for sedation and a faster onset time (in about 3 mins) than that into the quadriceps (P <0.001). HR decreased from baseline (P <0.001) and over time (P <0.001), mainly in cats of the butorphanol-supraspinatus and pethidine-quadriceps groups (P = 0.004). The occurrence of mydriasis was lower after butorphanol than after methadone and pethidine (P = 0.025), while the incidence of side effects did not differ among groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: All three protocols provided a good quality of sedation and allowed performing the scheduled procedure. Moreover, the injection into the supraspinatus muscle showed superior results in all the qualitative scores of sedation and quicker onset time than that into the quadriceps muscle.

Clinical effect of buprenorphine or butorphanol, in combination with detomidine and diazepam, on sedation and postoperative pain after cheek tooth extraction in horses.

The objective of this study was to compare effects of butorphanol (BUT) or buprenorphine (BUP), in combination with detomidine and diazepam, on the sedation quality, surgical conditions, and postoperative pain control after cheek tooth extraction in horses, randomly allocated to 2 treatment groups (BUT: n = 20; BUP: n = 20). A bolus of detomidine (15 µg/kg, IV) was followed by either BUP (7.5 µg/kg, IV) or BUT (0.05 mg/kg, IV). After 20 min, diazepam (0.01 mg/kg, IV) was administered and sedation was maintained with a detomidine IV infusion (20 µg/kg/h), with rate adjusted based on scores to 5 variables. All horses received a nerve block (maxillary or mandibular), and gingival infiltration with mepivacaine. Sedation quality was assessed by the surgeon from 1 (excellent) to 10 (surgery not feasible). A pain scoring system (EQUUS-FAP) was used to assess postoperative pain. Serum cortisol concentrations and locomotor activity (pedometers) were measured. Horses in BUP and BUT required a median detomidine infusion rate of 30.2 µg/kg/h (20 to 74.4 µg/kg/h) and 32.2 µg/kg/h (20 to 48.1 µg/kg/h), respectively (P = 0.22). Horses in the BUP group had better sedation quality (P < 0.05) during surgery and higher step counts (P < 0.001) postoperatively. Buprenorphine combined with detomidine provided a more reliable sedation than butorphanol. However, the EQUUS-FAP pain scale became unreliable because of BUP-induced excitement behavior.

Effet clinique de la buprénorphine ou du butorphanol, en association avec la détomidine et le diazépam, sur la sédation et la douleur postopératoire après extraction de dents jugales chez le cheval. L'objectif de cette étude était de comparer les effets du butorphanol (BUT) ou de la buprénorphine (BUP), en association avec la détomidine et le diazépam, sur la qualité de la sédation, les conditions chirurgicales et la gestion de la douleur postopératoire après extraction des dents jugales chez les chevaux, répartis au hasard dans deux groupes de traitement (BUT : n = 20; BUP : n = 20). Un bolus de détomidine (15 µg/kg, IV) a été suivi soit de BUP (7,5 µg/kg, IV) soit de BUT (0,05 mg/kg, IV). Après 20 min, du diazépam (0,01 mg/kg, IV) a été administré et la sédation a été maintenue avec une perfusion IV de détomidine (20 µg/kg/h), avec un taux ajusté en fonction des scores de cinq variables. Tous les chevaux ont reçu un bloc nerveux (maxillaire ou mandibulaire) et une infiltration gingivale avec de la mépivacaïne. La qualité de la sédation a été évaluée par le chirurgien de 1 (excellent) à 10 (chirurgie impossible). Un système de notation de la douleur (EQUUS-FAP) a été utilisé pour évaluer la douleur postopératoire. Les concentrations sériques de cortisol et l'activité locomotrice (podomètres) ont été mesurées.Les chevaux en BUP et BUT ont nécessité un débit médian de perfusion de détomidine de 30,2 µg/kg/h (20 à 74,4 µg/kg/h) et 32,2 µg/kg/h (20 à 48,1 µg/kg/h), respectivement (P = 0,22). Les chevaux du groupe BUP avaient une meilleure qualité de sédation (P < 0,05) pendant la chirurgie et un nombre de pas plus élevé (P < 0,001) après l'opération. La buprénorphine associée à la détomidine a fourni une sédation plus fiable que le butorphanol. Cependant, l'échelle de douleur EQUUS-FAP est devenue peu fiable en raison du comportement d'excitation induit par le BUP.(Traduit par Dr Serge Messier).

Combination of Dexmedetomidine and Butorphanol Optimized Sedation in Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) allows for the evaluation of dynamic airway collapse in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. However, a standardized sedation regimen for DISE is not yet available. This study aimed to investigate the safety profiles and efficacies of dexmedetomidine combined with butorphanol for DISE. METHODS: Sixty patients with obstructive sleep apnea scheduled to undergo DISE were randomly divided into Group D and Group DB. All recipients were initially given intravenous butorphanol (1 mg) (Group DB) or saline (Group D). Subsequently, both groups were sedated using a loading dose of 1.0 µg/kg/h of dexmedetomidine. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, the time to attain sufficient sedation, wakeup time, and adverse events during DISE were recorded. RESULTS: Compared with Group D, the time until sufficient sedation and wakeup time in Group DB were significantly reduced. A higher performer satisfaction level was achieved in Group DB. Patients in Group DB showed a higher incidence of bradycardia compared with Group D. However, the bradycardia resolved spontaneously in both groups without any treatment. There was no instance of cough, hypotension, arrhythmia, nausea or vomiting in either group. CONCLUSION: Compared to dexmedetomidine alone, a small dose of butorphanol infusion (1 mg) as an adjunct treatment to dexmedetomidine during DISE can reduce the dosage of dexmedetomidine, shorten the time until sufficient sedation and enhance the performer satisfaction level. This synergistic combination could be a promising sedation regimen for DISE in terms of procedural convenience and patient safety.

Butorphanol in combination with dexmedetomidine provides efficient pain management in adult burn patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the sedation and analgesic effects of butorphanol alone and butorphanol in combination with dexmedetomidine on dressing changes in adult burn patients. METHOD: From June 2016 to May 2019, 44 adult burn patients from our department were enrolled in this prospective, double-blinded study. Their total burn surface area (TBSA) varied from 10% to 30%; and the depth of burn injury ranged from second degree to third degree. The patients were randomized into two groups. In the control group, butorphanol combined with saline was injected into the body via venous route during dressing change. In the observation group, butorphanol in combination with dexmedetomidine was injected. The variation in mean blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and peripheral oxygen saturation were recorded at various time-points of the procedure. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of pain and Ramsay Sedation Scores (RSS) were also recorded at different time points. Consumption of butorphanol and adverse events in these two groups were compared. RESULTS: The mean blood pressure and heart rate were significantly decreased in the observation group before butorphanol injection (P < 0.05) and before the dressing change (P < 0.05). The respiratory rates and peripheral oxygen saturation of these two groups showed no significant differences at all time points (P > 0.05). Patients in the observation group had lower VAS scores during dressing change (P < 0.05). The RSS Scores in the observation group were higher than those in the control group during (P < 0.05) and after the dressing change (P < 0.05). The consumption of butorphanol was more in the control group (P < 0.05), and the adverse events recorded in the control group were higher (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Butorphanol combined with dexmedetomidine can reduce analgesic use of butorphanol during dressing change. This combination resulted in a higher sedation score and fewer adverse effects.

The Effectiveness and Safety of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine of Different Concentrations Combined with Butorphanol for Post-Caesarean Section Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of intravenous dexmedetomidine of different concentrations and to evaluate its maternal and neonatal safety when combined with butorphanol in parturients undergoing cesarean section. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 114 parturients between 24 and 43 years of age, with singleton pregnancy who underwent elective cesarean section under epidural anesthesia, were randomly allocated to four groups: group C received 0.9% sodium chloride after delivery, followed by butorphanol (3 µg·kg-1·h-1); patients in groups D1, D2, and D3 received 0.5 µg·kg-1·h-1 dexmedetomidine after delivery, followed by butorphanol (3 µg·kg-1·h-1) combined with dexmedetomidine 0.03, 0.05, and 0.08 µg·kg-1·h-1, respectively. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 6 h after delivery when patients were at rest. Secondary outcome measures included VAS after delivery when patients were on movement and uterine cramping, Ramsay sedation scale (RSS), relative infant dose (RID) of dexmedetomidine, satisfaction with analgesia after surgery and symptoms of CNS depression in neonates. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient characteristics among the groups (P > 0.05). The VAS at all timepoints after delivery in groups D2 and D3 were significantly lower than in groups C and D1 (P < 0.001). RSS scores were clearly higher in group D3 than in the other three groups at 6 h and 12 h (P < 0.0001). RID in groups D1, D2, and D3 was 0.171%, 0.197%, and 0.370%, respectively. Compared with group D1, RID was higher in group D3 (P = 0.0079). Degree of satisfaction with analgesia was higher in groups D2 and D3 (P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Continuous intravenous infusion of 0.05 µg·kg-1·h-1 dexmedetomidine combined with 3 µg·kg-1·h-1 butorphanol could be safely applied in healthy parturients with satisfactory analgesia after cesarean section without changes in sedation.

Use of Butorphanol as Treatment for Cholestatic Itch.

BACKGROUND: Pruritus is a debilitating symptom of cholestatic diseases such as primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis and often results in major reduction in quality of life for afflicted patients. Classic treatment options for the treatment of cholestatic pruritus include antihistamines, bile acid resins, serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and mu-opioid antagonists. Unfortunately, these drugs are not always successful in treating pruritus of cholestasis and may be associated with adverse effects. Recent advances in our understanding of itch pathophysiology have led to the use of butorphanol, a kappa-opioid agonist and mu-opioid antagonist, for the treatment of various forms of pruritus. Reports of butorphanol to treat cholestatic itch specifically are rare. AIMS: To better understand the role of butorphanol in the treatment of cholestatic pruritus, including characterization of its side effect profile. METHODS: We present a case series of eight adult patients with cholestatic disease who were treated with butorphanol in hopes of alleviating intractable pruritus. Patients were identified through a clinical data request form serviced by University of Miami Information Technology. RESULTS: Five out of eight patients (62.5%) reported successful reductions in itch severity after treatment with butorphanol, two patients reported no (or transient) change in itch severity, and one patient reported a paradoxical increase in itching. Side effects included somnolence, sedation, nausea, vomiting, and dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: Butorphanol was safe and leads to clinically significant symptomatic improvement. Clinicians should be aware of butorphanol as an off-label treatment option for pruritus of cholestasis. Further studies are needed to better characterize the effect of butorphanol on cholestatic itch.

Plasma histamine concentrations in horses administered sodium penicillin, guaifenesin-xylazine-ketamine and isoflurane with morphine or butorphanol.

OBJECTIVE: Various drugs administered to horses undergoing surgical procedures can release histamine. Histamine concentrations were evaluated in horses prepared for surgery and administered butorphanol or morphine intraoperative infusions. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective studies with one randomized. ANIMALS: A total of 44 client-owned horses. METHODS: In one study, anesthesia was induced with xylazine followed by ketamine-diazepam. Anesthesia was maintained with guaifenesin-xylazine-ketamine (GXK) during surgical preparation. For surgery, isoflurane was administered with intravenous (IV) morphine (group M: 0.15 mg kg-1 and 0.1 mg kg-1 hour-1; 15 horses) or butorphanol (group B: 0.05 mg kg-1 and 0.01 mg kg-1 hour-1; 15 horses). Histamine and morphine concentrations were measured using enzyme-linked immunoassay before opioid injection (time 0), and after 1, 2, 5, 30, 60 and 90 minutes. In a subsequent study, plasma histamine concentrations were measured in 14 horses before drug administration (baseline), 15 minutes after IV sodium penicillin and 15 minutes after starting GXK IV infusion. Statistical comparison was performed using anova for repeated measures. Pearson correlation compared morphine and histamine concentrations. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Significance was assumed when p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: With histamine, differences occurred between baseline (3.2 ± 2.4 ng mL-1) and GXK (5.2 ± 7.1 ng mL-1) and between baseline and time 0 in group B (11.9 ± 13.4 ng mL-1) and group M (11.1 ± 12.4 ng mL-1). No differences occurred between baseline and after penicillin or between groups M and B. Morphine concentrations were higher at 1 minute following injection (8.1 ± 5.1 ng mL-1) than at 30 minutes (4.9 ± 3.1 ng mL-1) and 60 minutes (4.0 ± 2.5 ng mL-1). Histamine correlated with morphine at 2, 30 and 60 minutes. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: GXK increased histamine concentration, but concentrations were similar with morphine and butorphanol.

Evaluation of nalbuphine, butorphanol and morphine in dogs during ovariohysterectomy and on early postoperative pain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of nalbuphine, butorphanol and morphine combined with acepromazine on intraoperative and early postoperative pain management in dogs anesthetized for ovariohysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized blinded clinical study. ANIMALS: A total of 48 healthy female dogs of different breeds, aged 1-6 years, weighing (mean ± standard deviation) 14.5 ± 4.8 kg. METHODS: Dogs were randomly assigned into four groups to be intravenously administered nalbuphine (0.5 mg kg-1; group N0.5), nalbuphine (1.0 mg kg-1; group N1.0), butorphanol (0.4 mg kg-1; group B0.4) or morphine (0.2 mg kg-1; group M0.2) combined with acepromazine (0.02 mg kg-1) prior to propofol and isoflurane for anesthesia. Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate, systolic arterial pressure and rectal temperature (RT) were recorded at time points during anesthesia. A dynamic interactive visual analog scale applied in three phases (DIVAS I, II and III) and the modified Glasgow composite measure pain scale were used to assess pain before premedication and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 hours after extubation. Administration of rescue analgesia was recorded. RESULTS: At the left ovarian pedicle ligation, HR was higher in N1.0 than in B0.4 (p = 0.020). RT decreased significantly by the end of surgery in N0.5 (p = 0.043) and B0.4 (p = 0.010). Rescue analgesia was administered postoperatively over 6 hours to eight, seven, nine and 10 dogs in N0.5, N1.0, B0.4 and M0.2, respectively (p = 0.57). DIVAS II was higher in B0.4 than in N1.0 at 2 and 3 hours (p = 0.038 and p = 0.002, respectively) and N0.5 at 3 hours (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: At the doses used, all premedication protocols provided insufficient intraoperative analgesia, with minimal clinical differences between groups. No premedication provided satisfactory analgesia in the first 6 hours postoperatively.