ABSTRACT
Resumen Las náuseas y vómitos postoperatorios (NVPO) son un problema frecuente en los pacientes quirúrgicos. Cuando no son prevenidos adecuadamente pueden provocar mayor morbilidad, estadía prolongada en la unidad de recuperación postoperatoria y hospitalización no planificada. El objetivo del equipo quirúrgico debe ser la profilaxis de las NVPO más que su tratamiento, con el fin de disminuir significativamente su incidencia y complicaciones asociadas. Los principales factores de riesgo para NVPO son: sexo femenino, historia de NVPO en cirugías previas y/o cinetosis, no fumar, uso de opioides sistémicos en el postoperatorio, someterse a ciertos tipos de cirugía (como colecistectomía, cirugía laparoscópica y cirugía ginecológica), utilizar anestésicos volátiles y/u óxido nitroso intraoperatorios, y duración de la cirugía. Sugerimos objetivar el riesgo de NVPO utilizando las escalas de riesgo de NVPO de Apfel o Koivuranta. Los principales fármacos antieméticos usados como profilaxis y tratamiento en el período perioperatorio son dexametasona, ondansetrón y droperidol. Existen estrategias generales que se pueden utilizar para reducir el riesgo quirúrgico basal de NVPO como evitar la anestesia general, privilegiando la anestesia regional, utilizar propofol para la inducción y mantención de la anestesia, evitar el uso de óxido nitroso y/o anestésicos inhalatorios, minimizar el uso postoperatorio de opioides sistémicos y recibir una hidratación intravenosa abundante durante la cirugía. La etiología de las NVPO es multifactorial, por lo que la prevención y tratamiento deben incluir diferentes clases de antieméticos, que actúen sobre los diferentes receptores de náuseas y/o vómitos hasta el momento conocidos, junto con las estrategias generales antes mencionadas.
Abstract Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are a common problem in surgical patients. When not properly prevented, they can lead to increased morbidity, prolonged stay in the postoperative recovery unit and unplanned hospitalization. The objective of the surgical team should be the prophylaxis of PONV rather than its treatment, in order to significantly reduce its incidence and associated complications. The main risk factors for PONV are: female sex, history of PONV in prior surgeries and/or motion sickness, non-smoking, use of systemic opioids postoperatively, undergo certain types of surgery (such as cholecystectomy, laparoscopic surgery and gynecological surgery), use volatile anesthetics and/or intraoperative nitrous oxide, and duration of surgery. We suggest to objectify the risk of PONV using the Apfel or Koivuranta PONV risk scales. The main anti-emetic drugs used as prophylaxis and treatment in the perioperative period are dexamethasone, ondansetron and droperidol. There are general strategies that can be used to reduce the baseline surgical risk of PONV such as avoiding general anesthesia, favoring regional anesthesia, using propofol for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia, avoiding the use of nitrous oxide and/or inhalational anesthetics, minimizing the postoperative use of systemic opioids and to receive an abundant intravenous hydration during surgery. The etiology of PONV is multifactorial, so prevention and treatment should include different classes of antiemetics, acting on the different receptors of nausea and/or vomiting so far known, together with the general strategies mentioned above.
Subject(s)
Humans , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/prevention & control , Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Midazolam/therapeutic use , Butyrophenones/therapeutic use , Propofol/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Risk Assessment , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/therapy , Dihydroxytryptamines/antagonists & inhibitors , Antiemetics/administration & dosageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis is an inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa, with common symptoms, which is essentially characterized by nasal itching, nasal congestion, sneezing, hyaline rhinorrhea and repetitive sneezing. The disease is very common, 15% of the population worldwide suffers it. Among many treatments that have been used to relieve the symptoms of this disease there is a selective inhibitor of H1 receptors, ebastine. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient satisfaction using the scale of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multicentric, retrospective, observational study performed in 250 Mexican patients with the diagnosis of intermittent allergic rhinitis (IAR) or persistent allergic rhinitis (PER), confirmed by prick test, specific IgE, or both, treated with lyophilised ebastine in fast-dissolving (FDT) 20 mg at any time in the last two months, prescribed for at least two weeks by their doctor to relieve the symptoms of intermittent allergic rhinitis or persistent allergic rhinitis. We used a validated questionnaire assessment scales, TSQM. RESULTS: The presentation of ebastine fast-dissolving (FDT) is effective and has good tolerability, over 80% of patients reported comfort and satisfaction using it. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of overall satisfaction, efficacy, tolerability and comfort showed that ebastine in fast-dissolving is an antihistamine with clear benefits to encourage compliance.
Subject(s)
Butyrophenones/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists/administration & dosage , Piperidines/administration & dosage , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/drug therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Butyrophenones/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Mexico , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Solubility , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
This is a case report of a woman of 38 years old, studied and analyzed at the service of allergy and immunology with clinical manifestations of allergic rhinitis; studies of laboratory, cabinet and intradermal test were made to corroborate this diagnosis and the treatment with specific hyposensitization, oral antihistaminines and inhaled steroids was started. Two years later the patient referred urinary retention without important antecedents, so, a peripheral anticholinergic syndrome (PAS) was suspected, a urodynamic test study was carried out consisting in a uroflujometry, static and dynamic urethral profile, cystometry, flow pressure study and electromyography, which diagnosed low urinary obstruction (functional) and vesical sphincter pseudodysfunction, demonstrating the PAS associated with oral antihistamines.
Subject(s)
Affective Symptoms/chemically induced , Anti-Allergic Agents/adverse effects , Butyrophenones/adverse effects , Cachexia/chemically induced , Cholinergic Antagonists/adverse effects , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/adverse effects , Histamine H1 Antagonists/adverse effects , Ketotifen/adverse effects , Loratadine/adverse effects , Piperidines/adverse effects , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/drug therapy , Urinary Retention/chemically induced , Adult , Affective Symptoms/diagnosis , Affective Symptoms/physiopathology , Anti-Allergic Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Butyrophenones/administration & dosage , Butyrophenones/therapeutic use , Cachexia/diagnosis , Cachexia/physiopathology , Cholinergic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Cholinergic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Diagnostic Errors , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Histamine H1 Antagonists/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists/pharmacology , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating/therapeutic use , Humans , Ketotifen/administration & dosage , Ketotifen/therapeutic use , Loratadine/administration & dosage , Loratadine/therapeutic use , Mometasone Furoate , Mood Disorders/diagnosis , Piperidines/administration & dosage , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Pregnadienediols/administration & dosage , Pregnadienediols/therapeutic use , Receptors, Muscarinic/drug effects , Receptors, Muscarinic/physiology , Urinary Retention/diagnosis , Urinary Retention/physiopathologySubject(s)
Humans , Anesthesia/adverse effects , Atropine/administration & dosage , Atropine/therapeutic use , Nausea/drug therapy , Nausea/physiopathology , Scopolamine/administration & dosage , Scopolamine/therapeutic use , Vomiting/drug therapy , Vomiting/physiopathology , Cholinergic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Cholinergic Antagonists/therapeutic use , Butyrophenones/therapeutic use , Cannabinoids/therapeutic use , Glycopyrrolate/administration & dosage , Glycopyrrolate/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Phenothiazines/therapeutic use , Receptors, Serotonin , Serotonin Antagonists/therapeutic useABSTRACT
A prospective, comparative, random study was conducted with 40 patients treated with ebastine vs. terfenadine. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of both as second generation antihistamines used in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Ten milligrams of ebastine was administered once a day before breakfast (fasting), in 5 and 10 year old children and 20 mg in 11 to 15 year olds. Ebastine was more efficient in the control of symptoms (rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, sneezing, eye and nose itching) than terfenadine from the seventh day on, (p 0.05). Tolerance to ebastine was good, although a small number of patients (1.5%) suffered collateral symptoms: sleepiness, headaches and nausea. The two doses of ebastine (10 or 20 mg depending on the patients age) had overall efficacy rates better than terfenadine (p 0.05%).
Subject(s)
Butyrophenones/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/drug therapy , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/drug therapy , Terfenadine/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Eosinophilia/etiology , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Leukocyte Count , Male , Prospective Studies , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/complications , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/complications , Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal/immunologyABSTRACT
Ebastine is a new piperidine-containing, relatively nonsedating second-generation H1-receptor antagonist. In a double-blind, parallel-group study of a single 5 mg or 10 mg dose of ebastine syrup used to treat allergic rhinitis in 20 children aged 6 to 12 years, we tested the hypothesis that the medication would have a duration of action of at least 24 hours. We measured plasma concentrations of carebastine, the pharmacologically active metabolite of ebastine, and the wheals and flares produced by epicutaneous tests with histamine phosphate, 1.0 mg/ml. Ebastine was absorbed well; peak carebastine concentrations occurred approximately 3 hours after dosing. Mean plasma elimination half-life values of carebastine ranged from 10 to 14 hours. The pharmacokinetics of carebastine were linear and dose independent in the dosage range studied. After the 5 or 10 mg dose, there were no significant differences between mean plasma elimination half-life values, mean oral clearance values, or mean apparent volumes of distribution. Mean peak plasma carebastine concentrations and mean areas under the plasma carebastine concentration-time curve after the 10 mg dose were 1.93 and 1.76 times, respectively, the values obtained after the 5 mg dose. Both doses significantly reduced the histamine-induced wheal-and-flare areas for up to 28 hours compared with predose values. The differences in effect between the doses generally were not statistically or clinically significant. No adverse effects were noted. We conclude that ebastine, an effective H1-receptor antagonist with a prompt onset of action and a long duration of action, is suitable for once-daily administration to children.
Subject(s)
Butyrophenones/pharmacokinetics , Butyrophenones/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists/pharmacokinetics , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Piperidines/pharmacokinetics , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/drug therapy , Butyrophenones/administration & dosage , Child , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Histamine H1 Antagonists/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Piperidines/administration & dosage , Skin TestsABSTRACT
Se da por sentado que en la esquizofrenia, los efectos terapéuticos de los neurolépticos se basan en el bloqueo de los receptores de dopamina situados en el cerebro. Sin embargo, también se admite que los neurolépticos "clásicos" presentan algunos incovenientes importantes: su relativa falta de efectos sobre los síntomas negativos y su capacidad de inducción de síntomas extrapoiramidales (SEP). Experiencias clínicas llevadas a cabo con pipamperona mostraron que un antagonista combinado de serotinina 5-HT2 y dopamina D2 presentaba ventajas en el tratamiento de la esquizofrenia. Esto se hizo patente a través de los efectos antiautísticos observados, de la regulación de los ritmos de sueño y de vigilia perturbados y de la baja tendencia a la inducción de SEP. Los estudios realizados con setoperona, compuesto de perfil farmacológico comparable, confirmaron estas observaciones. No se pudo explorar la exacta implicación del antagnista 5-HT2 en los tratamientos psicofarmacológicos de la esquizofrenia hasta no haberse realizado la síntesis del receptor antagonista selectivo y específico: la ritanserina. En efecto las pruebas de doble ciego efectuadas demostraron una majoría sensible de los síntomas negativos y extrapiramidales. Puesto que las ventajas de la monoterapia en el tratamiento de la esquizofrenia son innegables, lo lógico era pasar a la selección de un compuesto con un antagonismo central comparable al de...
Subject(s)
Humans , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Serotonin Antagonists/therapeutic use , Sleep/drug effects , Butyrophenones/chemistry , Butyrophenones/pharmacology , Butyrophenones/therapeutic use , Pyrimidinones/chemistry , Pyrimidinones/pharmacology , Pyrimidinones/therapeutic use , Ritanserin/chemistry , Ritanserin/pharmacology , Ritanserin/therapeutic use , Serotonin Antagonists/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Se da por sentado que en la esquizofrenia, los efectos terapéuticos de los neurolépticos se basan en el bloqueo de los receptores de dopamina situados en el cerebro. Sin embargo, también se admite que los neurolépticos "clásicos" presentan algunos incovenientes importantes: su relativa falta de efectos sobre los síntomas negativos y su capacidad de inducción de síntomas extrapoiramidales (SEP). Experiencias clínicas llevadas a cabo con pipamperona mostraron que un antagonista combinado de serotinina 5-HT2 y dopamina D2 presentaba ventajas en el tratamiento de la esquizofrenia. Esto se hizo patente a través de los efectos antiautísticos observados, de la regulación de los ritmos de sueño y de vigilia perturbados y de la baja tendencia a la inducción de SEP. Los estudios realizados con setoperona, compuesto de perfil farmacológico comparable, confirmaron estas observaciones. No se pudo explorar la exacta implicación del antagnista 5-HT2 en los tratamientos psicofarmacológicos de la esquizofrenia hasta no haberse realizado la síntesis del receptor antagonista selectivo y específico: la ritanserina. En efecto las pruebas de doble ciego efectuadas demostraron una majoría sensible de los síntomas negativos y extrapiramidales. Puesto que las ventajas de la monoterapia en el tratamiento de la esquizofrenia son innegables, lo lógico era pasar a la selección de un compuesto con un antagonismo central comparable al de... (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Serotonin Antagonists/therapeutic use , Sleep/drug effects , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Butyrophenones/therapeutic use , Pyrimidinones/therapeutic use , Serotonin Antagonists/pharmacology , Butyrophenones/pharmacology , Pyrimidinones/pharmacology , Butyrophenones/chemistry , Pyrimidinones/chemistry , Ritanserin/therapeutic use , Ritanserin/pharmacology , Ritanserin/therapeutic use , Ritanserin/chemistryABSTRACT
As far as schizophrenia is concerned, therapeutical effects of neuroleptics based on brain-located dopamine receptor blockers are taken for granted. It is also admitted, however, that classical neuroleptics have inconveniences, namely: Their relative lack of effect on negative symptoms, and their liability to induce extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Pipamperone-based clinical studies evidenced that an antagonist combining serotonin 5-HT2, and dopamine D2 was successful in the treatment of schizophrenia--which could be clearly observed in (a) anti-autistic effects, (b) regulating disrupted sleep-wake rhythms, and (c) a lesser tendency to EPS. Setoperone-based studies--a compound with a comparable pharmacological profile--confirmed the above observations. Until, however, the synthesis of ritanserin--a specific, and selective antagonistic receptor--was not achieved, no exact implication of 5-HT2 antagonist in psychopharmacological treatments of schizophrenia could be explored further. Indeed, double-blind trials evidenced a remarkable improvement in negative as well as extrapyramidal symptoms. Since a monotherapy appeared as undeniably called for in the treatment of schizophrenia, the next logical step to be taken was selecting a compound with a central antagonism comparable to ritanserin's, and a central D2 antagonism comparable to haloperidol's. Among a chemical range of benzisoxazole derivatives, risperidone was thus selected. The first double-blind trials on chronic schizophrenic patients seem indeed to confirm that this substance is likely to get over the above mentioned inconveniences, so typical of classical neuroleptics.
Subject(s)
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Serotonin Antagonists/therapeutic use , Sleep/drug effects , Butyrophenones/chemistry , Butyrophenones/pharmacology , Butyrophenones/therapeutic use , Humans , Piperidines/chemistry , Piperidines/pharmacology , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Pyrimidinones/chemistry , Pyrimidinones/pharmacology , Pyrimidinones/therapeutic use , Ritanserin , Serotonin Antagonists/pharmacologyABSTRACT
É descrito um caso de hemicoreo-atetose aguda de etiologia vascular (hematomas da gânglia basal esquerda), seguido tardiamente por distonia de torçäo do tipo deformante e fixo durante o tratamento com butirofenoma, em uma paciente de 75 anos. A paciente era portadora de hipertensäo arterial e Diabetis mellitus, compensados clinicamente. O diagnóstico foi baseado na história clínica, exame neurológico e exames complementares (Radiografias do crânio, eletroencefalografia, líquido céfalo-raqueano e tomografia cerebral computadorizada)