Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 168
Filter
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32411097

ABSTRACT

Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the effects of different kinds of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) on primary aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) mainly with KCNJ5 mutations. Primary cultured APA cells were treated with different calcium channel blockers (L/T type CCB benidipine, T-type CCB mibefradil and L-type CCB nifedipine), and aldosterone secretagogues with or without nifedipine. Aldosterone level, aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) mRNA expression and cell proliferation were detected. The results showed that all three CCBs significantly inhibit aldosterone secretion and CYP11B2 mRNA expression. Benidipine was relatively more effective than mibefradil or nifedipine. In addition, only mibefradil marginally inhibited cell proliferation. Adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) had a much stronger effect in stimulating aldosterone secretion and promoting cell proliferation from APA's than angiotensin II (ATII). Different from ACTH and ATII, potassium had no effect. Nifedipine inhibited the basal and ACTH-, ATII-elicited aldosterone secretion. Twenty three of 24 APAs had somatic KCNJ5 mutation. In conclusion, benidipine, mibefradil and nifedipine significantly inhibit aldosterone secretion in primary cultured APA cells.


Subject(s)
Adenoma/pathology , Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms/pathology , Adrenocortical Adenoma/pathology , Aldosterone/metabolism , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Calcium Channel Blockers/pharmacology , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Adenoma/drug therapy , Adenoma/genetics , Adenoma/metabolism , Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms/genetics , Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms/metabolism , Adrenocortical Adenoma/drug therapy , Adrenocortical Adenoma/genetics , Adrenocortical Adenoma/metabolism , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Calcium Channel Blockers/classification , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gene Expression Profiling , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis
4.
Circulation ; 138(17): 1879-1896, 2018 10 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30354657

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Among his major cardiac electrophysiological contributions, Miles Vaughan Williams (1918-2016) provided a classification of antiarrhythmic drugs that remains central to their clinical use. METHODS: We survey implications of subsequent discoveries concerning sarcolemmal, sarcoplasmic reticular, and cytosolic biomolecules, developing an expanded but pragmatic classification that encompasses approved and potential antiarrhythmic drugs on this centenary of his birth. RESULTS: We first consider the range of pharmacological targets, tracking these through to cellular electrophysiological effects. We retain the original Vaughan Williams Classes I through IV but subcategorize these divisions in light of more recent developments, including the existence of Na+ current components (for Class I), advances in autonomic (often G protein-mediated) signaling (for Class II), K+ channel subspecies (for Class III), and novel molecular targets related to Ca2+ homeostasis (for Class IV). We introduce new classes based on additional targets, including channels involved in automaticity, mechanically sensitive ion channels, connexins controlling electrotonic cell coupling, and molecules underlying longer-term signaling processes affecting structural remodeling. Inclusion of this widened range of targets and their physiological sequelae provides a framework for a modernized classification of established antiarrhythmic drugs based on their pharmacological targets. The revised classification allows for the existence of multiple drug targets/actions and for adverse, sometimes actually proarrhythmic, effects. The new scheme also aids classification of novel drugs under investigation. CONCLUSIONS: We emerge with a modernized classification preserving the simplicity of the original Vaughan Williams framework while aiding our understanding and clinical management of cardiac arrhythmic events and facilitating future developments in this area.


Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/classification , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/drug therapy , Heart Conduction System/drug effects , Heart Rate/drug effects , Membrane Transport Modulators/classification , Membrane Transport Modulators/therapeutic use , Terminology as Topic , Action Potentials/drug effects , Animals , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/adverse effects , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/diagnosis , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/metabolism , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/physiopathology , Calcium Channel Blockers/classification , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Heart Conduction System/metabolism , Heart Conduction System/physiopathology , Humans , Ion Channels/drug effects , Ion Channels/metabolism , Membrane Transport Modulators/adverse effects , Neurotransmitter Agents/classification , Neurotransmitter Agents/therapeutic use , Potassium Channel Blockers/classification , Potassium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers/classification , Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use
5.
Int J Cardiol ; 236: 71-75, 2017 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28268085

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: When drug-induced coronary spasm provocation tests are performed, a washout period of >48h for calcium channel blockers (CCBs) is uniformly recommended. However, each CCB has a distinct half-life, and little is known about the influence of prior oral administration of CCBs on acetylcholine provocation test to evaluate coronary vasomotor reaction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 245 consecutive patients with suspected vasospastic angina who had undergone acetylcholine provocation test. Of those patients, 29 patients had been on amlodipine, an ultra-long term acting CCB (group A), 34 on other CCBs (group O), and 182 patients on no CCB (group N). After CCBs had been withheld > 48h, we performed acetylcholine provocation, which resulted in 152 positive, 36 intermediate, and 57 negative reactions. We evaluated coronary artery tone calculated as follows: (luminal diameter after nitrate-baseline luminal diameter)÷(luminal diameter after nitrate)×100 (%). In group A patients, coronary artery tone was lower (A:9.1±6.9% vs. O:11.7±8.3% vs. N:12.1±8.5%, p=0.0011) and the positive rate of acetylcholine provocation test was lower than group O and group N (A:41% vs. O:68% vs. N:64%, p=0.047). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that taking amlodipine until 2days before acetylcholine provocation test was a significant inverse predictor for acetylcholine-provoked coronary spasm (odds ratio 0.327; 95% confidence interval 0.125-0.858, p=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Residual vasodilatory effects of ultra-long acting CCB may decrease coronary artery tone and the vasoconstrictive reaction to acetylcholine suggesting that a 2-day pre-test drug holiday may not be long enough.


Subject(s)
Acetylcholine/administration & dosage , Angina Pectoris, Variant/diagnosis , Calcium Channel Blockers , Coronary Vasospasm , Coronary Vessels , Withholding Treatment/standards , Aged , Angina Pectoris, Variant/drug therapy , Calcium Channel Blockers/administration & dosage , Calcium Channel Blockers/classification , Calcium Channel Blockers/pharmacokinetics , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Vasospasm/chemically induced , Coronary Vasospasm/physiopathology , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/drug effects , Coronary Vessels/physiopathology , Dimensional Measurement Accuracy , Female , Half-Life , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Vasodilator Agents/administration & dosage
6.
Hipertens Riesgo Vasc ; 34 Suppl 2: 5-8, 2017.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29908667

ABSTRACT

L-type voltage-gated calcium channels play a key role in the regulation of arterial vascular smooth muscle tone and blood pressure levels and L-type calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are widely used antihypertensive drugs. Additionally, T-type channels regulate vascular tone in small-resistance vessels and renin and aldosterone secretion, and N-type channels, expressed in sympathetic nerve terminals, regulate the release of neurotransmitters. As compared with L-type CCBs, L/N-and L/T-type CCBs decreased intraglomerular pressure, improved renal hemodynamics and provided a greater decrease in proteinuria even in patients already treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors. Thus, dual L/N-and L/T-type CCBs may exhibit therapeutic advantages over L-type blockers in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease. However, further large-scale, long-term comparative trials are needed to confirm that these differences translate into an improvement in clinical outcomes. © 2017 SEHLELHA. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Hypertension/drug therapy , Calcium Channel Blockers/classification , Calcium Channels, L-Type/drug effects , Calcium Channels, L-Type/physiology , Calcium Channels, N-Type/drug effects , Calcium Channels, N-Type/physiology , Calcium Channels, T-Type/drug effects , Calcium Channels, T-Type/physiology , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , Myocytes, Smooth Muscle/drug effects
7.
J Gen Physiol ; 147(5): 375-94, 2016 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27114612

ABSTRACT

Calcins are a novel family of scorpion peptides that bind with high affinity to ryanodine receptors (RyRs) and increase their activity by inducing subconductance states. Here, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the structure-function relationships of the eight calcins known to date, based on their primary sequence, three-dimensional modeling, and functional effects on skeletal RyRs (RyR1). Primary sequence alignment and evolutionary analysis show high similarity among all calcins (≥78.8% identity). Other common characteristics include an inhibitor cysteine knot (ICK) motif stabilized by three pairs of disulfide bridges and a dipole moment (DM) formed by positively charged residues clustering on one side of the molecule and neutral and negatively charged residues segregating on the opposite side. [(3)H]Ryanodine binding assays, used as an index of the open probability of RyRs, reveal that all eight calcins activate RyR1 dose-dependently with Kd values spanning approximately three orders of magnitude and in the following rank order: opicalcin1 > opicalcin2 > vejocalcin > hemicalcin > imperacalcin > hadrucalcin > maurocalcin >> urocalcin. All calcins significantly augment the bell-shaped [Ca(2+)]-[(3)H]ryanodine binding curve with variable effects on the affinity constants for Ca(2+) activation and inactivation. In single channel recordings, calcins induce the appearance of a subconductance state in RyR1 that has a unique fractional value (∼20% to ∼60% of the full conductance state) but bears no relationship to binding affinity, DM, or capacity to stimulate Ca(2+) release. Except for urocalcin, all calcins at 100 nM concentration stimulate Ca(2+) release and deplete Ca(2+) load from skeletal sarcoplasmic reticulum. The natural variation within the calcin family of peptides offers a diversified set of high-affinity ligands with the capacity to modulate RyRs with high dynamic range and potency.


Subject(s)
Calcium Channel Blockers/pharmacology , Molecular Docking Simulation , Ryanodine Receptor Calcium Release Channel/metabolism , Scorpion Venoms/pharmacology , Amino Acid Motifs , Animals , Binding Sites , Calcium Channel Blockers/chemistry , Calcium Channel Blockers/classification , Protein Binding , Rabbits , Scorpion Venoms/chemistry , Scorpion Venoms/classification , Substrate Specificity
8.
Curr Pharm Des ; 22(3): 383-9, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26561058

ABSTRACT

Recent studies have shown that visit-to-visit blood pressure (BP) variability was emerging as an independent risk factor for stroke. Although the mechanism is not fully understood, artery remodeling would be closely associated with the relationship between visit-to-visit BP variability and stroke. In addition, the class of antihypertensive agents is suggested to be an important determinant of visit-to-visit BP variability. This review article summarizes the recent literature on these topics. In the elderly hypertensives, strict BP control using calcium channel blockade would play a crucial role to prevent stroke via reducing the visit-to-visit BP variability.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Carotid Arteries/drug effects , Hypertension/drug therapy , Stroke/etiology , Vascular Remodeling/drug effects , Antihypertensive Agents/administration & dosage , Antihypertensive Agents/classification , Blood Pressure Determination , Calcium Channel Blockers/administration & dosage , Calcium Channel Blockers/classification , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Carotid Arteries/physiopathology , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Risk , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/prevention & control
9.
Curr Mol Pharmacol ; 8(2): 110-22, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25966690

ABSTRACT

Inhibition of voltage-gated L-type calcium channels by organic calcium channel blockers is a well-established pharmacodynamic concept for the treatment of hypertension and cardiac ischemia. Since decades these antihypertensives (such as the dihydropyridines amlodipine, felodipine or nifedipine) belong to the most widely prescribed drugs world-wide. Their tolerability is excellent because at therapeutic doses their pharmacological effects in humans are limited to the cardiovascular system. During the last years substantial progress has been made to reveal the physiological role of different L-type calcium channel isoforms in many other tissues, including the brain, endocrine and sensory cells. Moreover, there is accumulating evidence about their involvement in various human diseases, such as Parkinson's disease, neuropsychiatric disorders and hyperaldosteronism. In this review we discuss the pathogenetic role of L-type calcium channels, potential new indications for existing or isoform-selective compounds and strategies to minimize potential side effects.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/pharmacology , Brain/drug effects , Calcium Channel Blockers/pharmacology , Calcium Channels, L-Type/metabolism , Ion Channel Gating/drug effects , Antihypertensive Agents/classification , Brain/metabolism , Brain/physiopathology , Calcium Channel Blockers/classification , Calcium Channels, L-Type/genetics , Humans , Ion Channel Gating/genetics , Ion Channel Gating/physiology , Models, Biological , Mutation , Protein Isoforms/antagonists & inhibitors , Protein Isoforms/genetics , Protein Isoforms/metabolism , Protein Subunits/antagonists & inhibitors , Protein Subunits/genetics , Protein Subunits/metabolism
10.
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol ; 55: 333-52, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25251994

ABSTRACT

The four major classes of antihypertensive drugs­diuretics, ß-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers)­have significant qualitative and quantitative differences in the adverse effects they cause. Structural and chemical differences have been identified within these classes, especially among the calcium channel blockers and, to a lesser extent, among the thiazide/thiazide-like diuretics. However, it has been more difficult to demonstrate that these differences translate into differential effects with respect to either the surrogate endpoint of blood pressure reduction or, more importantly, hypertension-related cardiovascular complications. Based on a hierarchy-of-evidence approach, differences are apparent between hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone based on evidence of moderate quality. Low-quality evidence suggests atenolol is less effective than other ß-blockers. However, no significant intraclass differences have been established among the other classes of antihypertensive drugs.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/classification , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Hypertension/drug therapy , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/classification , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/classification , Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/classification , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Animals , Antihypertensive Agents/adverse effects , Antihypertensive Agents/chemistry , Calcium Channel Blockers/classification , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Diuretics/classification , Diuretics/therapeutic use , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/physiopathology , Molecular Structure , Structure-Activity Relationship , Treatment Outcome
11.
PLoS One ; 9(10): e109834, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25330103

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High blood pressure can cause kidney damage, which can increase blood pressure, leading to a vicious cycle. It is not clear whether the protective effects of T-type calcium channel blockers (T-type CCBs) on renal function are better than those of L-type CCBs or renin-angiotensin system (RAS) antagonists in patients with hypertension. METHODS AND FINDINGS: PUBMED, MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID, Web of Science, Cochrane, CNKI, MEDCH, VIP, and WANFANG databases were searched for clinical trials published in English or Chinese from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2013. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and reported. A total of 1494 reports were collected, of which 24 studies with 1,696 participants (including 809 reports comparing T-type CCBs versus L-type CCBs and 887 reports comparing T-type CCB versus RAS antagonists) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with L-type CCBs, T-type CCBs resulted in a significant decline in aldosterone (mean difference = -15.19, 95% CI -19.65 - -10.72, p<1×10(-5)), proteinuria (mean difference = -0.73, 95% CI -0.88 - -0.57, p<1×10(-5)), protein to creatinine ratio (mean difference = -0.22, 95% CI -0.41 - -0.03, p = 0.02), and urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (mean difference = -55.38, 95% CI -86.67 - -24.09, p = 0.0005); no significant difference was noted for systolic blood pressure (SBP) (p = 0.76) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (p = 0.16). The effects of T-type CCBs did not significantly differ from those of RAS antagonists for SBP (p = 0.98), DBP (p = 0.86), glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.93), albuminuria (p = 0.97), creatinine clearance rate (p = 0.24), and serum creatinine (p = 0.27) in patients with hypertension. CONCLUSION: In a pooled analysis of data from 24 studies measuring the effects of T-type CCBs on renal function and aldosterone, the protective effects of T-type CCBs on renal function were enhanced compared with L-type CCBs but did not differ from RAS antagonists. Their protective effects on renal function were independent of blood pressure.


Subject(s)
Aldosterone/blood , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Calcium Channels, T-Type/metabolism , Hypertension/drug therapy , Proteinuria/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Calcium Channel Blockers/classification , Calcium Channels, L-Type/metabolism , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Middle Aged , Proteinuria/etiology
13.
Kardiologiia ; 53(6): 85-90, 2013.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23953051

ABSTRACT

The review describes the classification, mechanisms of action, the effects of calcium channel blockers slow and the clinical benefits of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, the third generation. Presented modern aspects of clinical pharmacology and research results on the efficacy, safety and organoprotective lercanidipine.


Subject(s)
Calcium Channels, L-Type/metabolism , Dihydropyridines , Hypertension , Antihypertensive Agents/pharmacology , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Calcium Channel Blockers/classification , Calcium Channel Blockers/pharmacology , Dihydropyridines/pharmacology , Dihydropyridines/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/metabolism , Medication Therapy Management , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Protective Agents , Treatment Outcome
14.
PLoS One ; 8(1): e53407, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23320083

ABSTRACT

Dihydropyridines (DHP), which nifedipine is a member of, preferentially block Ca(2+) channels of different cell types. Moreover, influx of Ca(2+) through L-type Ca(2+) channels (LTCCs) activates Ca(2+) signaling pathways, which in turn contribute to numerous cellular processes. Although LTCCs are expressed in undifferentiated cells, very little is known about its contributions to the transcriptional regulation of mesodermal and cardiac genes. This study aimed to examine the contribution of LTCCs and the effect of nifedipine on the commitment of pluripotent stem cells toward the cardiac lineage in vitro. The murine embryonic stem (ES, cell line D3) and induced pluripotent stem (iPS, cell clone 09) cells were differentiated into enhanced green fluorescence protein (EGFP) expressing spontaneously beating cardiomyocytes (CMs). Early treatment of differentiating cells with 10 µM nifedipine led to a significant inhibition of the cardiac mesoderm formation and cardiac lineage commitment as revealed by gene regulation analysis. This was accompanied by the inhibition of spontaneously occurring Ca(2+) transient and reduction of LTCCs current density (I(CaL)) of differentiated CMs. In addition, nifedipine treatment instigated a pronounced delay of the spontaneous beating embryoid body (EB) and led to a poor surface localization of L-type Ca(2+) channel α(1C) (Ca(V)1.2) subunits. Contrary late incubation of pluripotent stem cells with nifedipine was without any impact on the differentiation process and did not affect the derived CMs function. Our data indicate that nifedipine blocks the determined path of pluripotent stem cells to cardiomyogenesis by inhibition of mesodermal commitment at early stages of differentiation, thus the proper upkeep Ca(2+) concentration and pathways are essentially required for cardiac gene expression, differentiation and function.


Subject(s)
Calcium Channel Blockers/classification , Calcium Channel Blockers/pharmacology , Calcium Channels, L-Type/metabolism , Down-Regulation/drug effects , Embryonic Stem Cells/cytology , Embryonic Stem Cells/drug effects , Nifedipine/pharmacology , Animals , Calcium Channels, L-Type/genetics , Calcium Signaling , Cell Differentiation/drug effects , Cell Line , Embryoid Bodies/cytology , Embryoid Bodies/drug effects , Embryoid Bodies/metabolism , Embryonic Stem Cells/metabolism , Gene Expression/drug effects , Green Fluorescent Proteins/metabolism , Heart/drug effects , Heart/embryology , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/cytology , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/drug effects , Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells/metabolism , Mesoderm/cytology , Mesoderm/drug effects , Mesoderm/metabolism , Mice , Myocytes, Cardiac/cytology , Myocytes, Cardiac/drug effects , Myocytes, Cardiac/metabolism , Recombinant Proteins/metabolism
16.
Clin Calcium ; 21(12): 34-42, 2011 Dec.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22133822

ABSTRACT

Voltage-dependent calcium channels are divided into L type, T type, and N type. L type calcium channel blockers are widely used for treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. However, recent experimental and clinical findings suggest that not only L type calcium channel but also T and N type calcium cannels are possibly involved in cardiovascular diseases, through activation of sympathetic nervous system or aldosterone release. Therefore, it is proposed that L type calcium channel blockade combined with T type or N type calcium channel blockade may have additive benefits in preventing cardiovascular and renal diseases. Further future study is needed to clarify class effect and drug effect of each calcium channel blocker.


Subject(s)
Calcium Channel Blockers/classification , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Hypertension/drug therapy , Aldosterone/metabolism , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Calcium Channel Blockers/pharmacology , Calcium Channels/classification , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Clinical Trials as Topic , Dihydropyridines , Drug Therapy, Combination , Humans , Kidney Diseases/etiology , Kidney Diseases/prevention & control , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Sympathetic Nervous System/drug effects
17.
Clin Exp Hypertens ; 33(7): 455-62, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21649534

ABSTRACT

Recently, it has been demonstrated that L-/N-type calcium channel blockers (CCBs), cilnidipine, but not L-type CCB, decreased urinary protein in renin-angiotensin system (RAS), inhibitor-treated hypertensive patients with macroproteinuria. However, the antiproteinuric effect of cilnidipine was weaker in diabetic patients than in nondiabetic patients with macroproteinuria. This may be due to the fact that diabetic neuropathy was also developed in patients with advanced diabetic nephropathy because L-/N-type CCB has been considered to exert its renoprotetive effects through sympatholytic action. If so, the antiproteinuric effect of cilnidipine may be potent in patients with early stages of diabetic nephropathy. To elucidate our hypothesis, we designed a multi-center, open-labeled, randomized trial to compare the antialbuminuric effect between cilnidipine and amlodipine in RAS inhibitor-treated hypertensive (blood pressure [BP]: 130-180/80-110 mmHg) patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria (urinary albumin/creatinine [Cr] ratio: 30-300 mg/g). The primary study endpoint is the change in the urinary albumin/Cr ratio after a 1-year treatment. Enrollment began in April 2008 and was completed in March 2010. A total of 367 patients were randomly allocated to receive cilnidipine or amlodipine. At baseline, study subjects had 63.3± 8.5 years of age, 145.9 ± 12.2/80.8 ± 10.0 mmHg of BP, 101.0 ± 111.6 mg/g of urinary albumin/Cr. The trial is expected to show whether cilnidipine can exert an antialbuminuric effect in RAS inhibitor-treated hypertensive patients with early stages of diabetic nephropathy.


Subject(s)
Albuminuria/complications , Albuminuria/drug therapy , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetic Nephropathies/complications , Diabetic Nephropathies/drug therapy , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/drug therapy , Kidney Function Tests/methods , Aged , Albuminuria/physiopathology , Amlodipine/therapeutic use , Calcium Channel Blockers/classification , Calcium Channels, L-Type/drug effects , Calcium Channels, N-Type/drug effects , Clinical Protocols , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology , Diabetic Nephropathies/physiopathology , Dihydropyridines/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Renin-Angiotensin System/drug effects
18.
Circulation ; 123(15): 1611-21, 2011 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21464050

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest that there are differences in adherence to antihypertensive medications in different classes. Our objective was to quantify the association between antihypertensive drug class and adherence in clinical settings. METHODS AND RESULTS: Studies were identified through a systematic search of English-language articles published from the inception of computerized databases until February 1, 2009. Studies were included if they measured adherence to antihypertensives using medication refill data and contained sufficient data to calculate a measure of relative risk of adherence and its variance. An inverse-variance-weighted random-effects model was used to pool results. Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios were pooled separately, and HRs were selected as the primary outcome. Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled mean adherence by drug class ranged from 28% for ß-blockers to 65% for angiotensin II receptor blockers. There was better adherence to angiotensin II receptor blockers compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (HR, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.57), calcium channel blockers (HR, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 1.79), diuretics (HR, 1.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.73 to 2.20), and ß-blockers (HR, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 3.85). Conversely, there was lower adherence to diuretics compared with the other drug classes. The same pattern was present when studies that used odds ratios were pooled. After publication bias was accounted for, there were no longer significant differences in adherence between angiotensin II receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or between diuretics and ß-blockers. CONCLUSION: In clinical settings, there are important differences in adherence to antihypertensives in separate classes, with lowest adherence to diuretics and ß-blockers and highest adherence to angiotensin II receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. However, adherence was suboptimal regardless of drug class.


Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents/classification , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Hypertension/drug therapy , Medication Adherence , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/classification , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/classification , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/classification , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Calcium Channel Blockers/classification , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Diuretics/classification , Diuretics/therapeutic use , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology
20.
Clin Calcium ; 20(1): 24-30, 2010 Jan.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20048430

ABSTRACT

Calcium channel blockers have been widely recognized as important medicines for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension and angina pectoris. In Japan, more than 15 calcium channel blockers are clinically available, and their pharmacological profiles are known to vary in terms of action on subtypes of voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels, tissue selectivity, and influence on the sympathetic nerve activity. Thus, the classification of calcium channel blockers is useful for understanding the similarity and differences of the drugs' action, leading to optimum prescription.


Subject(s)
Calcium Channel Blockers/classification , Calcium Channel Blockers/chemistry , Calcium Channel Blockers/pharmacology , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Calcium Channels , Cardiovascular Diseases/drug therapy , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...