ABSTRACT
Direct Fick method is considered a standard reference method for estimation of cardiac output. It relies on indirect calorimetry to measure oxygen consumption. This is important as only a minor measurement error in oxygen consumption can result in false estimation of cardiac output. A number of studies have shown that indirect calorimetry overestimates oxygen consumption in adults. The aim of this prospective single center observational method comparison study was to compare the determination of oxygen consumption by indirect calorimetry and reverse Fick method in pediatric patients. Forty-two children mean age 352 days (range 30 to 1303 days) and mean weight 7.1 kg (range 2.7-13.6 kg) undergoing corrective cardiac surgery were included in the study. The mean (standard deviation) oxygen consumption by reverse Fick method was 43.5 (16.2) ml/min and by indirect calorimetry 49.9 (18.8) ml/min (p < 0.001). Indirect calorimetry overestimated the reverse Fick oxygen consumption by 14.7%. Bias between methods was 6.5 (11.3) ml/min, limits of agreement (LOA) - 15.7 and 28.7 ml/min and percentage error of 47.7%. A significant bias and large percentage error indicates that the methods are not interchangeable. Indirect calorimetry and the direct Fick method should be used with caution as a reference method in cardiac output comparison studies in young children.
Subject(s)
Calorimetry, Indirect/adverse effects , Cardiac Output/physiology , Monitoring, Physiologic/adverse effects , Oxygen Consumption/physiology , Bias , Calorimetry, Indirect/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Prospective Studies , Reference Standards , Respiratory Function TestsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate predictors of resting energy expenditure (REE) in older people which are more comfortable for them than indirect calorimetry and which are suitable for field studies. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Department of Human Biology, Kiel University. PARTICIPANTS: 100 (51 males, 49 females) healthy independently-living normal-weight (BMI, males 26.0±2.67 kg/m², females 25.0±3.29 kg/m²) Germans, aged 60-83 years. MEASUREMENTS: REE, body composition, anthropometry, peak expiratory flow rate (PEF), and physical activity level were determined using indirect calorimetry, bioimpedance analysis, anthropometrics, peak-flow-meter, and standardized questionnaire, respectively. Stepwise linear multiple regression analysis was performed with REE or weight adjusted REE as dependent variables. Independent variables were body height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, abdomen circumference, hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), lean body mass (LBM), PEF, and physical activity level. RESULTS: The only significant predictor of REE was LBM in males and BMI in females. Trunk circumferences emerged as strong predictors of weight adjusted REE. Abdomen circumference and hip circumference explained in males and females 69% and 70% of variation in adjusted REE, respectively. Weaker predictors were LBM in males (R² increased from 0.69 to 0.80) as well as body height and BMI in females (R² increased from 0.70 to 0.91). Waist circumference, WHR, physical activity level, and PEF were no significant determinants of adjusted REE. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that trunk circumferences, but not WHR, are very strong predictors of weight adjusted REE in non-geriatric older people. This implies that the sex-specific use of abdomen or hip circumference in combination with LBM or body height and BMI seems to be well sufficient to predict weight adjusted REE in the aged. These measures might also be of clinical relevance, because they are more comfortable for older sick people than indirect calorimetry. Further studies are needed to test the applicability of the prediction equations to frail older populations.
Subject(s)
Abdomen/anatomy & histology , Basal Metabolism , Body Fluid Compartments , Body Height , Body Mass Index , Body Weight , Hip/anatomy & histology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anthropometry , Body Composition , Calorimetry, Indirect/adverse effects , Calorimetry, Indirect/methods , Energy Metabolism , Exercise/physiology , Female , Geriatric Assessment , Germany , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity, Abdominal , Pain , Reference Values , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results , Rest/physiology , Sex Factors , Waist Circumference , Waist-Hip RatioABSTRACT
Resting energy expenditure (REE) is lower than predicted in persons taking atypical antipsychotic medication, and weight management is a significant clinical challenge for some of them. However, to date there have been no published guidelines to assist clinicians in choosing appropriate prediction equations to estimate energy expenditure in persons taking atypical antipsychotic medications. The objectives of this study were to measure REE in a group of men taking the atypical antipsychotic clozapine and to determine whether REE can be accurately predicted for this population using previously published regression equations. REE was measured using indirect calorimetry via a ventilated hood on eight men who had completed at least 6 months of treatment with clozapine. Comparisons between measured REE and predicted REE using five different equations were undertaken. The commonly-used Harris-Benedict and Schofield equations systematically overestimated REE. Predictions of REE from other equations were too variable for clinical use. When estimating energy requirements as part of a weight-management program in men who have been taking clozapine for 6 months, predictions of REE from the equations of Harris-Benedict and Schofield should be reduced by 280 kcal/day.
