ABSTRACT
SHORT syndrome is a rare developmental disorder frequently associated with growth failure and insulin resistant diabetes mellitus (IRDM). Since GH has a diabetogenic effect, GH therapy has been regarded as a contraindication. We observed a Brazilian girl with SHORT syndrome who received GH therapy from 4 6/12 years of age for SGA short stature. GH dosage was increased from 0.23 to 0.36 mg/kg/week, but statural response to GH therapy remained poor. Her blood HbA1c level, though it remained 5.5-6.0% in childhood, began to elevate with puberty and increased to 9.2% at 10 6/12 years of age, despite the discontinuation of GH therapy at 9 11/12 years of age. Laboratory studies indicated antibody-negative IRDM. She was treated with metformin and canagliflozin (a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor), which ameliorated overt diurnal hyperglycemia and mild nocturnal hypoglycemia and reduced her blood HbA1c around 7%. Whole exome sequencing revealed a de novo heterozygous pathogenic variant (c.1945C>T:p.(Arg649Trp)) in PIK3R1 known as the sole causative gene for SHORT syndrome. Subsequent literature review for patients with molecularly confirmed SHORT syndrome revealed the development of IRDM in 10 of 15 GH-untreated patients aged ≥12 years but in none of three GH-treated and six GH-untreated patients aged ≤10 years. These findings imply a critical role of pubertal development and/or advanced age rather than GH therapy in the development of IRDM, and a usefulness of SGLT2 inhibitor in the treatment of IRDM.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Growth Disorders/complications , Hypercalcemia/complications , Insulin Resistance/physiology , Metabolic Diseases/complications , Nephrocalcinosis/complications , Brazil , Canagliflozin/administration & dosage , Child , Diabetes Complications/diagnosis , Diabetes Complications/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus/metabolism , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Growth Disorders/diagnosis , Growth Disorders/drug therapy , Growth Disorders/metabolism , Human Growth Hormone/administration & dosage , Humans , Hypercalcemia/diagnosis , Hypercalcemia/drug therapy , Hypercalcemia/metabolism , Metabolic Diseases/diagnosis , Metabolic Diseases/drug therapy , Metabolic Diseases/metabolism , Metformin/administration & dosage , Nephrocalcinosis/diagnosis , Nephrocalcinosis/drug therapy , Nephrocalcinosis/metabolism , Puberty/drug effects , Puberty/metabolism , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/administration & dosageABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Canagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), increases urinary glucose excretion (UGE) and lowers plasma glucose (PG) levels by reducing the renal threshold for glucose (RTG ). This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of canagliflozin in pediatric T2D patients. METHODS: Patients, aged 10 to 17 years with mean weight 107.2 kg and body mass index 38.2 kg/m2 , underwent PK and PD assessments after receiving a single daily dose of canagliflozin 100 mg (n = 8) or 300 mg (n = 9) for 14 days. Data are presented as mean (SD). RESULTS: There were dose-dependent increases in the PK of canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg, with maximum plasma concentrations and areas under plasma concentration curves that were similar to the corresponding values in adults. Mean 24-hour RTG fell to 84.6 (13.8) mg/dL with canagliflozin 100 mg and to 69.1 (9.6) mg/dL with canagliflozin 300 mg; also consistent with reductions in RTG in adults. Mean 24-hour UGE increased from 5.3 (10.5) g at baseline to 74.1 (37.4) g with canagliflozin 100 mg and from 0.1 (0.04) g to 68.6 (26.5) g with canagliflozin 300 mg. Both doses were well tolerated and the tablets had acceptable taste, smell, and swallowability. CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric T2D patients, canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg had PK and PD characteristics similar to those in adults with T2D, which is likely due to the relative maturity and increased body weight of youth affected with this disorder.
Subject(s)
Canagliflozin/administration & dosage , Canagliflozin/pharmacokinetics , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Adolescent , Age of Onset , Brazil , Canagliflozin/adverse effects , Child , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Male , Pharmacokinetics , United StatesABSTRACT
The efficacy of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and empagliflozin in reducing hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes is well documented. In addition, positive effects have been observed with these agents on nonglycemic variables, such as reductions in body weight and blood pressure, which may confer additional health benefits. SGLT2 inhibitors are also associated with evidence of renal-protecting benefits. Furthermore, during the landmark Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes (EMPA-REG OUTCOME) trial, a substantial reduction in major adverse cardiovascular outcomes was demonstrated with empagliflozin therapy. In view of the complex pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes, a pharmacologic intervention for type 2 diabetes that produces a multifaceted reduction in cardiovascular disease risk, separate from glycemic control alone, would be advantageous. Although SGLT2 inhibitors are generally well tolerated, they are associated with an increased risk of genital mycotic infections, as well as the potential risk for serious adverse events such as dehydration, development of diabetic ketoacidosis, serious urinary tract infections, and bone fractures. The findings of ongoing research will help to determine the magnitude and clinical importance of these adverse events and whether the findings of EMPA-REG OUTCOME represent a class effect for SGLT2 inhibition or are specific to empagliflozin and will further elucidate the future role of SGLT2 inhibitors in the individualized management of patients with type 2 diabetes. In this article, we discuss the nonglycemic outcomes associated with SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes as well as the clinical implications of these agents.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors , Benzhydryl Compounds/administration & dosage , Benzhydryl Compounds/adverse effects , Benzhydryl Compounds/pharmacology , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Canagliflozin/administration & dosage , Canagliflozin/adverse effects , Canagliflozin/pharmacology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology , Glucosides/administration & dosage , Glucosides/adverse effects , Glucosides/pharmacology , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Hypoglycemic Agents/pharmacologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from Latin America. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Analyses were performed in subgroups of patients from Latin America based on data from three individual, 26-week, placebo-controlled studies of canagliflozin (monotherapy [n = 116/584], add-on to metformin [n = 199/918], and add-on to metformin plus sulfonylurea [n = 76/469]) and three individual, 52-week, active-controlled studies of canagliflozin (add-on to metformin versus sitagliptin [n = 240/1101], add-on to metformin versus glimepiride [n = 155/1450], and add-on to metformin plus sulfonylurea versus sitagliptin [n = 156/755]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes from baseline in HbA1c, body weight, and systolic blood pressure (BP) with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg versus placebo or active comparator (i.e., sitagliptin or glimepiride) were evaluated in the overall study populations and Latin American subgroups. Safety was assessed based on adverse event (AE) reports. RESULTS: Canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg provided reductions in HbA1c, body weight, and systolic BP across studies in patients from Latin America that were generally similar to those seen in the overall populations of patients with T2DM. The AE profile in patients from Latin America was equivalent to that in the overall populations; higher rates of genital mycotic infections and osmotic diuresis-related AEs were seen with canagliflozin versus comparators. Limitations of this study include the post hoc analysis of data and the small sample size of patients from Latin America. CONCLUSION: Canagliflozin improved glycemic control, reduced body weight and systolic BP, and was generally well tolerated in patients with T2DM from Latin America. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01081834; NCT01106677; NCT01106625; NCT00968812; NCT01137812.
Subject(s)
Canagliflozin/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Blood Pressure , Body Weight , Canagliflozin/administration & dosage , Canagliflozin/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Latin America , Male , Metformin/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Sitagliptin Phosphate/administration & dosage , Sulfonylurea Compounds/administration & dosage , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the early effects of canagliflozin on blood pressure (BP) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension. Patients were randomized to canagliflozin 300 mg, canagliflozin 100 mg, or placebo for 6 weeks and underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring before randomization, on day 1 of treatment, and after 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in mean 24-hour systolic BP (SBP) from baseline to week 6. Overall, 169 patients were included (mean age, 58.6 years; glycated hemoglobin, 8.1%; seated BP 138.5/82.7 mm Hg). At week 6, canagliflozin 300 mg provided greater reductions in mean 24-hour SBP than placebo (least squares mean -6.2 vs -1.2 mm Hg, respectively; P=.006). Numerical reductions in SBP were observed with canagliflozin 100 mg. Canagliflozin was generally well tolerated, with side effects similar to those reported in previous studies. These results suggest that canagliflozin rapidly reduces BP in patients with T2DM and hypertension.
Subject(s)
Canagliflozin/administration & dosage , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Canagliflozin/adverse effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Hypertension/blood , Hypertension/physiopathology , Hypoglycemic Agents/adverse effects , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Drug-drug interactions between canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, and glyburide, metformin, and simvastatin were evaluated in three phase-1 studies in healthy participants. In these open-label, fixed sequence studies, participants received: Study 1-glyburide 1.25 mg/day (Day 1), canagliflozin 200 mg/day (Days 4-8), canagliflozin with glyburide (Day 9); Study 2-metformin 2,000 mg/day (Day 1), canagliflozin 300 mg/day (Days 4-7), metformin with canagliflozin (Day 8); Study 3-simvastatin 40 mg/day (Day 1), canagliflozin 300 mg/day (Days 2-6), simvastatin with canagliflozin (Day 7). Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed at prespecified intervals. Co-administration of canagliflozin and glyburide did not affect the overall exposure (maximum plasma concentration [Cmax ] and area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) of glyburide and its metabolites (4-trans-hydroxy-glyburide and 3-cis-hydroxy-glyburide). Canagliflozin did not affect the peak concentration of metformin; however, AUC increased by 20%. Though Cmax and AUC were slightly increased for simvastatin (9% and 12%) and simvastatin acid (26% and 18%) following coadministration with canagliflozin, compared with simvastatin administration alone; however, no effect on active 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitory activity was observed. There were no serious adverse events or hypoglycemic episodes. No drug-drug interactions were observed between canagliflozin and glyburide, metformin, or simvastatin. All treatments were well-tolerated in healthy participants.