Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 78
Filter
6.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(43): e17580, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31651863

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a useful tool to differentiate small intestinal bleeding, inflammatory bowel disease, and other small bowel disease. The most common adverse effect of VCE is capsule retention; the incidence varies greatly depending on the underlying disease, which is known to increase from 1.5% in healthy individuals to 21% in patients with small bowel Crohn disease. We report this case on a patient who had asymptomatic capsule retention for 12 months and experienced natural elimination with medication. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 21-year-old woman presented to the hospital with chronic abdominal pain and persistent diarrhea for 2 years. DIAGNOSES: The patient was diagnosed with small bowel Crohn disease using VCE, and radiography revealed capsule retention. INTERVENTION: Symptoms of obstruction were not distinctive, it was decided to increase the dosages of azathioprine and infliximab to 50 and 500 mg (10 mg/kg), at 5 months after VCE. And at month 11 of capsule retention, she was admitted and started on a regimen of hydrocortisol 300 mg for 4 days and hydrocortisol injection 200 mg for 10 days. OUTCOMES: At month 12, abdominal radiography in the clinic confirmed that the capsule had been naturally retrieved. LESSONS: Capsule retention could be initially treated conservatively with medication and if the treatment fails, it is recommended to remove the capsule surgically. But in the case of the clinical condition of the patient is favorable without symptoms of bowel obstruction, the medication should be continued and the patient followed up.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopes/adverse effects , Capsule Endoscopy/adverse effects , Crohn Disease/diagnostic imaging , Foreign Bodies/physiopathology , Intestinal Obstruction/physiopathology , Crohn Disease/pathology , Defecation , Female , Foreign Bodies/etiology , Humans , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestine, Small/pathology , Young Adult
10.
Gastroenterol. latinoam ; 30(3): 129-134, 2019. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1104133

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is a useful test for the evaluation of the small bowel mucosa. The main complication of VCE is retention, so in patients with risk factors it is recommended to evaluate the permeability of the digestive tract with Patency Capsule (PC). We describe patients evaluated with PC before the study with VCE. Methods: Descriptive observational study of 96 patients referred for VCE. A clinical survey and images identified that 7 of these patients (7.3%) had retention risk factors, so they were previously requested PC. Results: 2 of the 7 patients evaluated with PC did not excrete the device, so the use of VCE was contraindicated; the subsequent study concluded Crohn's disease (CD) and jejunal stenosis due to retractable mesenteritis in these cases. Of the remaining 89 patients, not evaluated with PC, 1 (1.1%) developed retention of the VCE at an ulcerated stenosis, and was subsequently diagnosed as CD. Conclusion: In our study, we confirmed the usefulness of PC as a method to assess the risk of retention of VCE in patients with risk factors for ID stenosis.


Introducción: La video-cápsula endoscópica (VCE) es un examen útil para el estudio de patologías del intestino delgado (ID). La principal complicación de la VCE es la retención, por lo que en pacientes con factores de riesgo se recomienda evaluar la permeabilidad del tubo digestivo con Cápsula Patency (CP). Se presenta una serie de casos evaluados con CP previo al estudio con VCE. Métodos: Estudio observacional descriptivo de 96 pacientes derivados para realización de VCE. Mediante encuesta clínica e imágenes se identificó que 7 de estos pacientes (7,3%) tenían factores de riesgo de retención, por lo que se les solicitó previamente CP. Resultados: 2 de los 7 pacientes evaluados con CP no expulsaron el dispositivo por lo que se contraindicó el uso de VCE; el estudio posterior concluyó Enfermedad de Crohn (EC) y estenosis yeyunal por mesenteritis retráctil en estos dos casos. De los 89 pacientes restantes, no evaluados con CP, 1 (1,1%) presentó retención de la VCE a nivel de una estenosis ulcerada diagnosticada posteriormente como EC. Conclusión: En nuestra casuística se confirma la utilidad de la CP como un método para evaluar el riesgo de retención de VCE en pacientes con factores de riesgo de estenosis de ID.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Capsule Endoscopes/adverse effects , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestinal Obstruction/prevention & control , Intestine, Small/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Foreign Bodies
13.
Gastroenterol. latinoam ; 29(2): 75-78, 2018. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1117022

ABSTRACT

Capsule endoscopy is a technique that allows the study of the small intestine, through a device that is swallowed by the patient, capturing images as it travels through the digestive tract. Capsule retention is the most serious complication. We report the case of a 69 year-old male presenting with iron deficiency anemia, with normal upper endoscopy and colonoscopy; but obscure gastrointestinal bleeding was diagnosed and therefore a study with capsule endoscopy was requested. The patient evolves with retained capsule in the small intestine with ulcerated stenosis as shown by imaging. This finding was confirmed by enteroscopy with biopsy, without being able to extract the capsule. Medical management with corticosteroids was indicated for intestinal obstruction secondary to inflammatory stenosis in the context of Crohn's disease: The capsule was expelled after 21 days of ingestion, with a positive outcome


La cápsula endoscópica es una técnica que permite el estudio del intestino delgado, mediante un dispositivo que es deglutido por el paciente y captura imágenes en su recorrido por el tubo digestivo. La complicación más grave es la retención de la cápsula. Se reporta el caso de un paciente de sexo masculino, de 69 años con anemia ferropénica, con endoscopia alta y colonoscopia normal; planteándose sangrado gastrointestinal de origen oscuro por lo que se solicita estudio con cápsula endoscópica. El paciente evoluciona con retención de la cápsula en intestino delgado, visualizándose en las imágenes la presencia de estenosis ulcerada, hallazgo que se confirma mediante enteroscopia con toma de biopsias, sin lograr extraer la cápsula. Se indica manejo médico con corticoides por obstrucción intestinal secundario a estenosis inflamatoria en contexto de enfermedad de Crohn, expulsando espontáneamente la cápsula al día 21 de su ingestión, sin complicaciones.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Aged , Crohn Disease/diagnosis , Capsule Endoscopes/adverse effects , Foreign Bodies/etiology , Foreign Bodies/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Abdominal , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Capsule Endoscopy/adverse effects
14.
Digestion ; 96(1): 46-51, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28637030

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A patency capsule (PC) can help predict capsule endoscope (CE) retention; however, PC tolerability is unknown in children. We retrospectively evaluated PC tolerability in school-aged children. METHODS: Sixty-one patients (median age, 12.9 years; range 7.4-17.3 years) who underwent PC examination were analyzed for occurrence and determinants of ingestion difficulty and relationships between ingestion of the 2 capsules. We defined ingestion difficulty as taking 30 min or more, or failure, to ingest the PC. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (64%) successfully ingested the PC without ingestion difficulty. The other 22 had ingestion difficulty and were significantly younger (11.7 ± 2.2 vs. 13.0 ± 1.8 years; p = 0.04) and shorter (143.3 ± 14.0 vs. 154.6 ± 12.5 cm; p = 0.003) than those without ingestion difficulty. Multivariate analysis showed that the most significant factor for predicting PC ingestion difficulty was height (cutoff value, 152 cm). Time to ingest the CE was significantly shorter than that for PC ingestion (8 ± 32 vs. 20 ± 58 min; p = 0.01). All patients indicated that ingestion of the CE was easier because of its smooth surface compared with the PC. CONCLUSIONS: PC ingestion is not guaranteed in school-aged children. PC ingestion ability should be evaluated by considering the child's height and lack of experience ingesting capsules prior to PC examination.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopes/adverse effects , Capsule Endoscopy/adverse effects , Equipment Design , Intestinal Obstruction/diagnosis , Intestine, Small/physiopathology , Adolescent , Age Factors , Body Height , Capsule Endoscopy/instrumentation , Capsule Endoscopy/methods , Capsules/administration & dosage , Child , Deglutition , Female , Humans , Intestine, Small/diagnostic imaging , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
16.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 29(4): 428-434, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28253209

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Capsule endoscopy (CE) has an excellent safety profile. Although retention is the most cited complication, capsule aspiration is less frequent and is often reported only as isolated cases. This study represents a systematic effort to compile and scrutinize the available data on capsule aspiration to provide comprehensive and conclusive information on this CE complication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure. The search terms used were 'capsule endoscopy' AND 'aspiration' (both terms searched as keyword and MeSH). We included case reports and/or series on capsule aspiration, as well as observational cohort studies that reported capsule aspiration among their complications/outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-four case reports with 37 cases of capsule aspiration were identified. A further four observational studies reported aspiration as part of a cohort of patients undergoing CE. 94.6% of aspirations occurred in elderly men. 87.1% had significant comorbidities. 59.5% had symptoms on aspiration, with cough reported most frequently. The most common location of aspiration was the right main bronchus. Half of the patients required intervention for capsule retrieval; bronchoscopy was the most common management, with good effect. There was a single fatality following capsule aspiration, not directly related to the procedure, and one case of aspiration pneumonia. Outcomes were good for all other patients. The estimated overall aspiration rate is 0.1%. CONCLUSION: Although very rare and generally safely managed, capsule aspiration should be anticipated in certain patient groups and capsule administration should be approached with necessary precautions.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopes/adverse effects , Capsule Endoscopy/adverse effects , Foreign Bodies/etiology , Lung , Respiratory Aspiration/etiology , Bronchoscopy/methods , Cough/etiology , Foreign Bodies/therapy , Humans , Respiratory Aspiration/therapy
17.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 109(6): 480, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28247769

ABSTRACT

The Agile® capsule has shown to be useful when evaluating the patency of the small bowel in patients prior to capsule endoscopy studies. It is a safe tool and a low rate of complications have been reported, highlighting symptomatic retention, although references in literature are scarce and it is only observed in 1.2% of the procedures. We present the case of a symptomatic retention of this device in a patient with previously known colonic Crohn's disease in who a small bowel study was indicated and was sent for prior patency test.


Subject(s)
Capsule Endoscopes/adverse effects , Adult , Capsule Endoscopy , Crohn Disease/complications , Crohn Disease/diagnostic imaging , Fecal Impaction/complications , Fecal Impaction/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Intestinal Obstruction/diagnostic imaging , Intestinal Obstruction/etiology , Intestinal Obstruction/surgery , Short Bowel Syndrome/complications , Short Bowel Syndrome/diagnostic imaging
18.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 109(2): 106-113, feb. 2017.
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-159853

ABSTRACT

Background and aims: Small bowel submucosal lesions (SBSL) and innocent bulges may have an identical appearance and be difficult to distinguish on small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE). Recently, Girelli et al. proposed a score, smooth, protruding lesion index on capsule endoscopy (SPICE), in order to differentiate between the two. We aimed to evaluate and validate SPICE as a differentiation method between innocent bulges and SBSLs. Methods: We evaluated all SBCEs performed in our department between January 2005 and September 2015, and selected the ones with a smooth, round, protruding lesion in the small bowel. Lesions with suspicious characteristics were excluded. A video clip of the region of interest was created and SPICE was assigned blindly and independently by two endoscopists. We determined the discriminative ability of SPICE using the definitive diagnosis of each patient as the standard criteria. Results: We included 30 SBCEs corresponding to 12 SBSLs (four gastrointestinal stromal tumors, two neuroendocrine tumors, four lipomas and two polypoid lymphangiectasias) and 18 innocent bulges. SPICE scores ranged from 0 to 4, allowing the distinction between SBSLs and innocent bulges (p < 0.001). SPICE > 2 had a 66.7% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, 100.0% positive predictive value and 78.3% negative predictive value, and the area under the curve was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.73-1.00; p < 0.001) for the diagnosis of SBSL. Conclusions: Our data support SPICE, namely a score > 2, as a predictive method of SBSLs. Taking into account its simplicity, it may be very useful in the distinction between SBSLs and innocent bulges on SBCE (AU)


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Capsule Endoscopes/trends , Capsule Endoscopes , Intestinal Neoplasms , Decision Support Techniques , Intestine, Small/injuries , Capsule Endoscopes/adverse effects , 28599 , Lipoma , Intestine, Small/pathology , Intestine, Small , Retrospective Studies
20.
Gastroenterol. latinoam ; 28(4): 238-241, 2017. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1120064

ABSTRACT

The endoscopic capsule is classically used in the study of occult bleeding, but has recently been shown to be useful in the diagnosis and follow-up of Crohn's disease. The retention of the capsule is the most frequent complication related to its use. We report the case of a 30-year-old male patient with recurrent abdominal pain and suspected Crohn's disease. A procedure with a video endoscopic capsule was performed; twelve hours after its ingestion, the patient goes to the emergency department due to worsening of the pain. Abdominal and pelvic CT demonstrates multiple areas of segmental parietal thickening of the ileum and a metallic foreign body in an area of stenosis corresponding to the retained endoscopic capsule. It evolves with persistent pain despite pharmacological therapy. Subsequently it is extracted by enteroscopy. The indications and risks of the use of the endoscopic video capsule, and the clinical and imaging factors predictive of retention are discussed.


La video cápsula endoscópica se utiliza clásicamente en el estudio de sangrado oculto, pero últimamente se ha demostrado su utilidad en el diagnóstico y seguimiento de la enfermedad de Crohn. La retención de la cápsula es la complicación más frecuente relacionada a su uso. Se presenta el caso de un paciente de sexo masculino de 30 años con dolor abdominal recurrente y sospecha de enfermedad de Crohn. Dentro del estudio se le realiza una video cápsula endoscópica; doce horas posteriores a su ingesta consulta en el servicio de urgencia por empeoramiento del dolor. La tomografía computada de abdomen y pelvis demuestra múltiples áreas de engrosamiento parietal segmentarias del íleon y un cuerpo extraño metálico en un área de estenosis, correspondiente a la cápsula endoscópica retenida. Evoluciona con persistencia del dolor pese a la terapia farmacológica. Posteriormente se procede a su extracción mediante enteroscopia. Se discuten las indicaciones y riesgos del uso de la video cápsula endoscópica, y los factores clínicos e imagenológicos predictores de retención.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Crohn Disease/diagnostic imaging , Capsule Endoscopy/adverse effects , Capsule Endoscopes/adverse effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Capsule Endoscopy/instrumentation , Double-Balloon Enteroscopy/methods , Foreign Bodies/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...