Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 111
Filter
1.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 121: 104875, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33556416

ABSTRACT

N-Nitrosamines have recently been the subject of intense regulatory scrutiny, including the setting of low exposure limits (18 ng/day) (European Medicines Agency (EMA), 2020). This paper evaluates different methodologies to determine statistically robust bounds on the carcinogenic potency of chemical classes, using historic TD50 data (Peto et al., 1984; Thresher et al., 2019) and exemplified for N-nitrosamines. Initially, the distribution of TD50 values (TD50s) for N-nitrosamines of known potency was characterised. From this, it is possible to compare parametric and non-parametric methods to obtain percentiles of interest from the distribution of TD50s, which are shown to be robust to uncertainty in the initial TD50 estimates. These methods may then be applied to different chemical subclasses. The values obtained may be of use in refining acceptable intakes for N-nitrosamines and their subclasses.


Subject(s)
Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Carcinogens/toxicity , Nitrosamines/toxicity , Animals , Databases, Factual , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data
2.
Burns ; 47(4): 906-913, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33143991

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Several mechanisms play a role in the development of pneumonia after inhalation injury. Our aim was to analyze whether higher concentrations of inflammatory markers or of biomarkers of epithelial injury are associated with a higher incidence of pneumonia in patients with inhalation injury. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Secondary analysis of a single-center prospective observational cohort pilot study, performed over a two-year period (2015-2017) at the Burns Unit of the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Vall d'Hebron University Hospital. All patients aged 18 with suspected inhalation injury undergoing admission to the Burns Unit were included. Plasma biomarkers of the lung epithelium (RAGE and SP-D), inflammation markers (IL6, IL8), and IL33, as well as soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) levels, were measured within the first 24 h of admission. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with inhalation injury were included. Eight (33.3%) developed pneumonia after a median of 7 (4-8) days of hospital stay. Patients with pneumonia presented higher plasma concentrations of sST2 (2853 [2356-3351] ng/mL vs 1352 [865-1839] ng/mL; p < 0.001), IL33 (1.95 [1.31-2.59] pg/mL vs 1.26 [1.07-1.45] pg/mL; p = 0.002) and IL8 (325.7 [221.6-430.0] pg/mL vs 174.1 [95.2-253.0] pg/mL; p = 0.017) on day 1 of inclusion. Plasma sST2 concentration in the first 24 h demonstrated excellent diagnostic accuracy for predicting the occurrence of pneumonia in patients with smoke inhalation (AUROC 0.929 [95%CI 0.818-1.000]). A cutoff point of ≥2825 ng/mL for sST2 had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 100%. The risk ratio of pneumonia in patients with sST2 ≥ 2825 ng/mL was 7.14 ([95% CI 1.56-32.61]; p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma sST2 in the first 24 h of admission predicts the occurrence of pneumonia in patients with inhalation injury.


Subject(s)
Interleukin-1 Receptor-Like 1 Protein/antagonists & inhibitors , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Smoke Inhalation Injury/complications , Biomarkers/analysis , Biomarkers/blood , Carcinogenicity Tests/methods , Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Pilot Projects , Pneumonia/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Smoke Inhalation Injury/epidemiology , Smoke Inhalation Injury/mortality , Spain/epidemiology , Statistics, Nonparametric
3.
Toxicol Sci ; 175(2): 156-167, 2020 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32191327

ABSTRACT

Glyphosate is a widely used herbicide worldwide. In 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) reviewed glyphosate cancer bioassays and human studies and declared that the evidence for carcinogenicity of glyphosate is sufficient in experimental animals. We analyzed 10 glyphosate rodent bioassays, including those in which IARC found evidence of carcinogenicity, using a multiresponse permutation procedure that adjusts for the large number of tumors eligible for statistical testing and provides valid false-positive probabilities. The test statistics for these permutation tests are functions of p values from a standard test for dose-response trend applied to each specific type of tumor. We evaluated 3 permutation tests, using as test statistics the smallest p value from a standard statistical test for dose-response trend and the number of such tests for which the p value is less than or equal to .05 or .01. The false-positive probabilities obtained from 2 implementations of these 3 permutation tests are: smallest p value: .26, .17; p values ≤ .05: .08, .12; and p values ≤ .01: .06, .08. In addition, we found more evidence for negative dose-response trends than positive. Thus, we found no strong evidence that glyphosate is an animal carcinogen. The main cause for the discrepancy between IARC's finding and ours appears to be that IARC did not account for the large number of tumor responses analyzed and the increased likelihood that several of these would show statistical significance simply by chance. This work provides a more comprehensive analysis of the animal carcinogenicity data for this important herbicide than previously available.


Subject(s)
Biological Assay/statistics & numerical data , Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Glycine/analogs & derivatives , Glycine/toxicity , Herbicides/toxicity , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Animals , Animals, Laboratory , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Neoplasms/physiopathology , United States
4.
Environ Health ; 19(1): 18, 2020 02 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32050978

ABSTRACT

Since the introduction of glyphosate-tolerant genetically-modified plants, the global use of glyphosate has increased dramatically making it the most widely used pesticide on the planet. There is considerable controversy concerning the carcinogenicity of glyphosate with scientists and regulatory authorities involved in the review of glyphosate having markedly different opinions. One key aspect of these opinions is the degree to which glyphosate causes cancer in laboratory animals after lifetime exposure. In this review, twenty-one chronic exposure animal carcinogenicity studies of glyphosate are identified from regulatory documents and reviews; 13 studies are of sufficient quality and detail to be reanalyzed in this review using trend tests, historical control tests and pooled analyses. The analyses identify 37 significant tumor findings in these studies and demonstrate consistency across studies in the same sex/species/strain for many of these tumors. Considering analyses of the individual studies, the consistency of the data across studies, the pooled analyses, the historical control data, non-neoplastic lesions, mechanistic evidence and the associated scientific literature, the tumor increases seen in this review are categorized as to the strength of the evidence that glyphosate causes these cancers. The strongest evidence shows that glyphosate causes hemangiosarcomas, kidney tumors and malignant lymphomas in male CD-1 mice, hemangiomas and malignant lymphomas in female CD-1 mice, hemangiomas in female Swiss albino mice, kidney adenomas, liver adenomas, skin keratoacanthomas and skin basal cell tumors in male Sprague-Dawley rats, adrenal cortical carcinomas in female Sprague-Dawley rats and hepatocellular adenomas and skin keratocanthomas in male Wistar rats.


Subject(s)
Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Glycine/analogs & derivatives , Herbicides/toxicity , Toxicity Tests, Chronic/statistics & numerical data , Animals , Glycine/toxicity , Mice , Rats , Glyphosate
5.
SAR QSAR Environ Res ; 31(1): 33-48, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31766891

ABSTRACT

Over the past years, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) released to the public domain several databases, with the main objectives of collecting and storing hazard data on the substances considered in EFSA's risk assessment and secondly to serve as a basis for further development of in silico tools such as quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models. In this work, we evaluated the ability of freely available QSAR models to estimate genotoxicity and carcinogenicity properties and their possible use for screening purposes on three different EFSA's databases. With an accuracy close to 90%, the results showed good capabilities of QSAR models to predict genotoxicity in terms of bacterial reverse mutation test, while statistics for in vivo micronucleus test are not satisfactory (accuracy in the predictions close to 50%). Interestingly, results on the carcinogenicity assessment showed an accuracy in prediction close to 70% for the best models. In addition, an example of the potential application of in silico models is presented in order to provide a preliminary screening of genotoxicity properties of botanicals intended for use as food supplements.


Subject(s)
Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Mutagenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship , Bacteria/drug effects , Bacteria/genetics , Databases, Factual , Micronucleus Tests/statistics & numerical data , Models, Theoretical , Mutation/genetics , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment
6.
Pharm Stat ; 19(3): 326-334, 2020 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31830352

ABSTRACT

High rates of mortality on long term carcinogenicity studies can often result in challenges when it comes to the statistical analysis of tumor incidence. The current regulatory advice often results in treated groups being terminated earlier than the control group. However, this advice rarely considers the impact of this action on the statistical analyses. The nature of these analyses means that groups terminated at different times may not be directly comparable due to age differences of the animals. Here we discuss the issues related to this and investigate several approaches of how to incorporate these groups within the statistical analyses. Although no single method appears to resolve these issues consistently, inclusion of the early terminated group is still informative. Depending on the timing of the early termination, either pooling of the groups into a single terminal kill (TK) interval or reassignment of intervals based purely on time of death (ie, no separate TK interval) appear preferable. However, to draw meaningful conclusions the time of onset of a given tumor must also be considered alongside incident rates and any statistical findings.


Subject(s)
Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Models, Statistical , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Research Design/statistics & numerical data , Animals , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Male , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , Time Factors
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31547363

ABSTRACT

The proliferation of cellular antennas and other radiofrequency radiation (RFR) generating devices of the last decades has led to more and more concerns about the potential health effects from RFR exposure. Since the 2011 classification as a possible carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), more experimental studies have been published that support a causal association between RFR exposure and health hazards. As regard cancer risk, two long-term experimental studies have been recently published by the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) and the Italian Ramazzini Institute (RI). Despite important experimental differences, both studies found statistically significant increases in the development of the same type of very rare glial malignant tumors. In addition to carcinogenicity, reproductive organs might be particularly exposed, as well as sensitive to RFR. In this work, we reviewed the currently available evidence from in vivo studies on carcinogenicity and reproductive toxicity studies in order to summarize the contribution of experimental research to the prevention of the adverse effects of RFR on human health.


Subject(s)
Radiation Exposure/adverse effects , Radio Waves/adverse effects , Reproduction/radiation effects , Animals , Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Carcinogenicity Tests/veterinary , Humans , Toxicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Toxicity Tests/veterinary
8.
J Biopharm Stat ; 29(1): 128-142, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29781779

ABSTRACT

Interest has been expressed in using a joint test procedure that requires that the results of both a trend test and a pairwise comparison test between the control and the high groups be statistically significant simultaneously at the levels of significance recommended in the FDA 2001 draft guidance for industry document for the separate tests in order for the drug effect on the development of an individual tumor type to be considered as statistically significant. Results of our simulation studies show that there is a serious consequence of large inflations of the false negative rate through large decreases of false positive rate in the use of the above joint test procedure in the final interpretation of the carcinogenicity potential of a new drug if the levels of significance recommended for separate tests are used. The inflation can be as high as 204.5% of the false negative rate when the trend test alone is required to test if the effect is statistically significant. To correct the problem, new sets of levels of significance have also been developed for those who want to use the joint test in reviews of carcinogenicity studies.


Subject(s)
Biostatistics/methods , Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Drugs, Investigational/toxicity , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Animals , Computer Simulation , Data Interpretation, Statistical , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Humans , Models, Statistical , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment , Time Factors
9.
Stat Med ; 36(30): 4893-4907, 2017 Dec 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28872695

ABSTRACT

We provide a simple and practical, yet flexible, penalized estimation method for a Cox proportional hazards model with current status data. We approximate the baseline cumulative hazard function by monotone B-splines and use a hybrid approach based on the Fisher-scoring algorithm and the isotonic regression to compute the penalized estimates. We show that the penalized estimator of the nonparametric component achieves the optimal rate of convergence under some smooth conditions and that the estimators of the regression parameters are asymptotically normal and efficient. Moreover, a simple variance estimation method is considered for inference on the regression parameters. We perform 2 extensive Monte Carlo studies to evaluate the finite-sample performance of the penalized approach and compare it with the 3 competing R packages: C1.coxph, intcox, and ICsurv. A goodness-of-fit test and model diagnostics are also discussed. The methodology is illustrated with 2 real applications.


Subject(s)
Biostatistics/methods , Proportional Hazards Models , Algorithms , Animals , Calcinosis/diagnosis , Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans , Lenses, Intraocular/adverse effects , Likelihood Functions , Male , Mice , Monte Carlo Method , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Regression Analysis , Sample Size
10.
J Appl Toxicol ; 37(6): 709-720, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27917502

ABSTRACT

Cell Transformation Assays (CTAs) have long been proposed for the identification of chemical carcinogenicity potential. The endpoint of these in vitro assays is represented by the phenotypic alterations in cultured cells, which are characterized by the change from the non-transformed to the transformed phenotype. Despite the wide fields of application and the numerous advantages of CTAs, their use in regulatory toxicology has been limited in part due to concerns about the subjective nature of visual scoring, i.e. the step in which transformed colonies or foci are evaluated through morphological features. An objective evaluation of morphological features has been previously obtained through automated digital processing of foci images to extract the value of three statistical image descriptors. In this study a further potential of the CTA using BALB/c 3T3 cells is addressed by analysing the effect of increasing concentrations of two known carcinogens, benzo[a]pyrene and NiCl2 , with different modes of action on foci morphology. The main result of our quantitative evaluation shows that the concentration of the considered carcinogens has an effect on foci morphology that is statistically significant for the mean of two among the three selected descriptors. Statistical significance also corresponds to visual relevance. The statistical analysis of variations in foci morphology due to concentration allowed to quantify morphological changes that can be visually appreciated but not precisely determined. Therefore, it has the potential of providing new quantitative parameters in CTAs, and of exploiting all the information encoded in foci. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Subject(s)
Carcinogens/toxicity , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/pathology , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Animals , BALB 3T3 Cells , Benzo(a)pyrene/toxicity , Carcinogenicity Tests/methods , Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Mice , Microscopy/methods , Microscopy/statistics & numerical data , Nickel/toxicity
11.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 74 Suppl: S14-24, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26772617

ABSTRACT

Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) is a cyclic siloxane used in the production of industrial and consumer products. Four groups of 60 Fischer-344 female rats were analyzed for uterine endometrial adenocarcinoma (inhalation study with exposure levels in ppm/number of observed cases: 0/0, 10/1, 40/0, and 160/5) by exact regression (logistic, Poisson), the max poly-3 trend test, and a random effects probit model. When comparing the 160 ppm group to controls after 24 months, the incidence of adenocarcinomas was elevated (borderline significant); it was significant when all exposure levels were included. Four sets of (historical) control groups were formed, with varying heterogeneity. The effect of D5 was either significant or borderline significant when comparing all control sets to the 160 ppm group. When considering all exposure groups using any of the analysis methods, a significant effect was observed when the high dose group was included in the analysis; the effect was not significant when the high dose group was not included. The evidence tends to support the conclusion that D5 at the highest dose level (160 ppm) results in an increased incidence of adenocarcinomas. However, it is important to verify any potential effect through a biological investigation.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/chemically induced , Endometrial Neoplasms/chemically induced , Siloxanes/toxicity , Administration, Inhalation , Animals , Biological Assay/statistics & numerical data , Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Models, Statistical , Rats, Inbred F344 , Toxicity Tests, Chronic/statistics & numerical data
12.
Biometrics ; 71(4): 1168-75, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26102570

ABSTRACT

An important objective in biomedical and environmental risk assessment is estimation of minimum exposure levels that induce a pre-specified adverse response in a target population. The exposure points in such settings are typically referred to as benchmark doses (BMDs). Parametric Bayesian estimation for finding BMDs has grown in popularity, and a large variety of candidate dose-response models is available for applying these methods. Each model can possess potentially different parametric interpretation(s), however. We present reparameterized dose-response models that allow for explicit use of prior information on the target parameter of interest, the BMD. We also enhance our Bayesian estimation technique for BMD analysis by applying Bayesian model averaging to produce point estimates and (lower) credible bounds, overcoming associated questions of model adequacy when multimodel uncertainty is present. An example from carcinogenicity testing illustrates the calculations.


Subject(s)
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Models, Statistical , Animals , Bayes Theorem , Benzene Derivatives/toxicity , Biometry/methods , Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Maximum Allowable Concentration , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Uncertainty
13.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol ; 112(5): 302-13, 2013 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23374861

ABSTRACT

This survey is a compendium of genotoxicity and carcinogenicity information of bronchodilators and antiasthma drugs. Data from 46 marketed drugs were collected. Of these 46 drugs, 25 (54.3%) did not have retrievable genotoxicity or carcinogenicity data. The remaining 21 (45.7%) had at least one genotoxicity or carcinogenicity test result. Of these 21 drugs, 10 had at least one positive finding: three tested positive in at least one genotoxicity assay, eight in at least one carcinogenicity assay, and one of them gave positive results in both genotoxicity assay and carcinogenicity assay. Concerning the predictivity of genetic toxicology findings for the result(s) of long-term carcinogenesis assays, 15 drugs had both genotoxicity and carcinogenicity data: seven of them (46.6%) were neither genotoxic nor carcinogenic, 6 (40.0%) were carcinogenic in at least one sex of mice or rats but tested negative in genotoxicity assays, 1 (6.7%) tested positive in genotoxicity assay but was non-carcinogenic, and 1 (6.7%) gave positive responses in both genotoxicity and carcinogenicity assay. Only 11 (23.9%) of the 46 drugs considered had all data required by current guidelines for testing of pharmaceuticals, but a large fraction of them were developed and marketed prior to the present regulatory climate.


Subject(s)
Bronchodilator Agents/toxicity , Carcinogenicity Tests , Carcinogens/toxicity , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Mutagenicity Tests , Mutagens/toxicity , Animals , Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Carcinogens/classification , Data Collection , Guidelines as Topic , Mice , Mutagenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Mutagens/classification , Pharmaceutical Preparations/classification , Rats
14.
Exp Toxicol Pathol ; 65(3): 243-53, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21945048

ABSTRACT

Incidences of neoplastic lesions were evaluated in untreated Hannover Wistar Rats RjHan: WI (470 males and 470 females) used as control animals in eight carcinogenicity studies. All these studies were performed in a similar environment either for the in vivo and the postmortem evaluation. The major neoplastic lesions were found in the endocrine, integumentary and reproductive systems. Pituitary adenoma was the most frequent neoplasm and occurred in 33.9% of the males and 54.6% of the female rats. The other most frequent tumors in males were thyroid C-cell adenoma (8.6%), pancreatic islet cell adenoma (8.1%), subcutaneous fibrosarcoma (6.6%), subcutaneous fibroma (4.7%), benign pheochromocytoma (3.4%), and cutaneous keratoacanthoma (3.4%). In females, the other highest incidences were mammary fibroadenoma (29%), uterine endometrial stromal polyp (18.1%), mammary adenocarcinoma (14.2%), mammary fibroadenoma with atypia (13.7%), thyroid C-cell adenoma (7.5%), benign thymoma (3.7%), and subcutaneous fibrosarcoma (3.6%). All these data were compared to previously published historical control data. This retrospective analysis was undergone in order to illustrate the result of a stable organization which guarantees a robust historical data base for neoplastic and non neoplastic findings.


Subject(s)
Control Groups , Neoplasms/veterinary , Animals , Carcinogenicity Tests/methods , Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Carcinogenicity Tests/veterinary , Disease Susceptibility/epidemiology , Disease Susceptibility/pathology , Disease Susceptibility/veterinary , Female , History, 21st Century , Incidence , Laboratory Animal Science/history , Male , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/pathology , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Sex Factors , Survival Analysis , Time Factors
15.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 64(1): 26-34, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22749913

ABSTRACT

Several doses and a control group can be compared under order restriction using the Williams procedure for normally distributed endpoints assuming variance homogeneity. Comparison of the survival functions represents a secondary endpoint in long-term in vivo bioassays of carcinogenicity. Therefore, a Williams-type procedure for the comparison of survival functions is proposed for the assumption of the Cox proportional hazards model or the general frailty Cox model to allow a joint analysis over sex and strains. Interpretation according to both statistical significance and biological relevance is possible with simultaneous confidence intervals for hazard ratios. Related survival data can be analyzed using the R packages survival, coxme, and multcomp. Together with the R packages MCPAN and nparcomp, Dunnett- or Williams-type procedures are now available for the statistical analysis of the following endpoint types in toxicology: (i) normally distributed, (ii) non-normally distributed, (iii) score (ordered categorical) data, (iv) crude proportions, (v) survival functions, and (vi) time-to-tumor data with and without cause-of-death information.


Subject(s)
Biometry/methods , Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Carcinogens/toxicity , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Xenobiotics/toxicity , Animals , Carcinogens/classification , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Mice , Mortality , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasms/mortality , Pesticide Synergists/toxicity , Piperonyl Butoxide/toxicity , Proportional Hazards Models , Rats , Risk Assessment , Toxicology/statistics & numerical data , Xenobiotics/classification
17.
Pharm Stat ; 10(6): 477-84, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22140058

ABSTRACT

The Statisticians in the Pharmaceutical Industry Toxicology Special Interest Group has collated and compared statistical analysis methods for a number of toxicology study types including general toxicology, genetic toxicology, safety pharmacology and carcinogenicity. In this paper, we present the study design, experimental units and analysis methods.


Subject(s)
Research Design/statistics & numerical data , Toxicology/standards , Animals , Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Mutagenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Toxicity Tests/statistics & numerical data
18.
J Toxicol Sci ; 35(1): 79-85, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20118627

ABSTRACT

The purpose of a toxicity test is to determine the no-observed-effect level (NOEL) of test substance through biological and pharmacological techniques. If the low dose not does show statistically significant and biologically relevant changes in the data evaluated in a study, the usual practice is to consider this dose as the NOEL. To overcome this, 6 types of techniques that seemed to be appropriate are presented in this paper by investigating the results of several domestic and foreign theses on toxicology. The most appropriate techniques appear to be the trend test, comparison between treatment group and historical control by t-test, and confirmation that all individual values lie within the 95% confidence interval (2 SD) of the historical control value, if a significant difference is admitted in the low dose.


Subject(s)
Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Animals , Carcinogenicity Tests/methods , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level , Rats
19.
Toxicol Lett ; 190(3): 266-70, 2009 Nov 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19439165

ABSTRACT

Prior to having performed in depth toxicological, genotoxicological and DMPK studies on ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) providing solid evidence for a thresholded dose response relationship, we had prepared and shared with regulatory authorities a preliminary risk estimate based on standard linear dose-effect projections. We estimated that maximal lifetime cancer risk was in the order of 10(-3) (for lifetime ingestion of the maximally contaminated tablets) or 10(-4) for the exposure lasting for 3 months. This estimate was based on a lifetime cancer study with methyl methanesulfonate (MMS; as insufficient data were available for EMS) in rodents and default linear back extrapolation. Analogous estimates were made specifically for breast cancer based on short term tumorigenicity studies with EMS in rats, for the induction of heritable mutations based on specific locus and dominant lethal tests in mice and for the induction of birth defects based on teratogenicity studies in mice. We concluded that even under worst case assumptions of linear dose relations the chance of experiencing these adverse effects would be very small, comprising at most a minute additional burden among the background incidence of the patients.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/toxicity , Drug Contamination , Ethyl Methanesulfonate/toxicity , HIV Protease Inhibitors/chemistry , Nelfinavir/chemistry , Abnormalities, Drug-Induced , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/chemistry , Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Ethyl Methanesulfonate/analogs & derivatives , Ethyl Methanesulfonate/chemistry , Female , Genes, Dominant/drug effects , Genes, Lethal/drug effects , Germ-Line Mutation/drug effects , Humans , Linear Models , Mammary Neoplasms, Animal/chemically induced , Mammary Neoplasms, Animal/pathology , Methyl Methanesulfonate/chemistry , Methyl Methanesulfonate/toxicity , Mice , Mutagenicity Tests , No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level , Pregnancy , Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship , Rats , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data
20.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol ; 234(2): 209-21, 2009 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18977375

ABSTRACT

Determining the carcinogenicity and carcinogenic potency of new chemicals is both a labor-intensive and time-consuming process. In order to expedite the screening process, there is a need to identify alternative toxicity measures that may be used as surrogates for carcinogenic potency. Alternative toxicity measures for carcinogenic potency currently being used in the literature include lethal dose (dose that kills 50% of a study population [LD(50)]), lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between tumor dose (TD(50)) and three alternative toxicity measures as an estimator of carcinogenic potency. A second aim of this study was to develop a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) between TD(50) and estimated/experimental predictor variables to predict the carcinogenic potency of new chemicals. Rat TD(50)s of 590 structurally diverse chemicals were obtained from the Cancer Potency Database, and the three alternative toxicity measures considered in this study were estimated using TOPKAT, a toxicity estimation software. Though poor correlations were obtained between carcinogenic potency and the three alternative toxicity (both experimental and TOPKAT) measures for the CPDB chemicals, a CART developed using experimental data with no missing values as predictor variables provided reasonable estimates of TD(50) for nine chemicals that were part of an external validation set. However, if experimental values for the three alternative measures, mutagenicity and logP are not available in the literature, then either the CART developed using missing experimental values or estimated values may be used for making a prediction.


Subject(s)
Carcinogenicity Tests/statistics & numerical data , Carcinogens/chemistry , Carcinogens/toxicity , Algorithms , Animals , Chemistry, Physical , Female , Lethal Dose 50 , Male , Models, Statistical , Predictive Value of Tests , Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship , Rats , Regression Analysis , Solubility
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...