Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 573
Filter
1.
Malar J ; 23(1): 147, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38750488

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Uganda, village health workers (VHWs) manage childhood illness under the integrated community case management (iCCM) strategy. Care is provided for malaria, pneumonia, and diarrhoea in a community setting. Currently, there is limited evidence on the cost-effectiveness of iCCM in comparison to health facility-based management for childhood illnesses. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of the management of childhood illness using the VHW-led iCCM against health facility-based services in rural south-western Uganda. METHODS: Data on the costs and effectiveness of VHW-led iCCM versus health facility-based services for the management of childhood illness was collected in one sub-county in rural southwestern Uganda. Costing was performed using the ingredients approach. Effectiveness was measured as the number of under-five children appropriately treated. The Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) was calculated from the provider perspective. RESULTS: Based on the decision model for this study, the cost for 100 children treated was US$628.27 under the VHW led iCCM and US$87.19 for the health facility based services, while the effectiveness was 77 and 71 children treated for VHW led iCCM and health facility-based services, respectively. An ICER of US$6.67 per under five-year child treated appropriately for malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea was derived for the provider perspective. CONCLUSION: The health facility based services are less costly when compared to the VHW led iCCM per child treated appropriately. The VHW led iCCM was however more effective with regard to the number of children treated appropriately for malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea. Considering the public health expenditure per capita for Uganda as the willingness to pay threshold, VHW led iCCM is a cost-effective strategy. VHW led iCCM should, therefore, be enhanced and sustained as an option to complement the health facility-based services for treatment of childhood illness in rural contexts.


Subject(s)
Case Management , Community Health Workers , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Rural Population , Uganda , Humans , Community Health Workers/economics , Case Management/economics , Child, Preschool , Infant , Malaria/economics , Malaria/drug therapy , Diarrhea/therapy , Diarrhea/economics , Pneumonia/economics , Pneumonia/therapy , Health Facilities/economics , Health Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Newborn , Male , Female , Community Health Services/economics
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 705, 2023 Jun 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37386431

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2017, Liberia became one of the first countries in the African region to develop and implement a national strategy for integrated case management of Neglected Tropical Diseases (CM-NTDs), specifically Buruli ulcer, leprosy, lymphatic filariasis morbidities, and yaws. Implementing this plan moves the NTD program from many countries' fragmented (vertical) disease management. This study explores to what extent an integrated approach offers a cost-effective investment for national health systems. METHODS: This study is a mixed-method economic evaluation that explores the cost-effectiveness of the integrated CM-NTDs approach compared to the fragmented (vertical) disease management. Primary data were collected from two integrated intervention counties and two non-intervention counties to determine the relative cost-effectiveness of the integrated program model vs. fragmented (vertical) care. Data was sourced from the NTDs program annual budgets and financial reports for integrated CM-NTDs and Mass Drug Administration (MDA) to determine cost drivers and effectiveness. RESULTS: The total cost incurred by the integrated CM-NTD approach from 2017 to 2019 was US$ 789,856.30, with the highest percentage of costs for program staffing and motivation (41.8%), followed by operating costs (24.8%). In the two counties implementing fragmented (vertical) disease management, approximately US$ 325,000 was spent on the diagnosis of 84 persons and the treatment of twenty-four persons suffering from NTDs. While 2.5 times as much was spent in integrated counties, 9-10 times more patients were diagnosed and treated. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of a patient being diagnosed under the fragmented (vertical) implementation is five times higher than integrated CM-NTDs, and providing treatment is ten times as costly. Findings indicate that the integrated CM-NTDs strategy has achieved its primary objective of improved access to NTD services. The success of implementing an integrated CM-NTDs approach in Liberia, presented in this paper, demonstrates that NTD integration is a cost-minimizing solution.


Subject(s)
Case Management , Delivery of Health Care , Infections , Neglected Diseases , West African People , Humans , Black People/statistics & numerical data , Budgets , Case Management/economics , Case Management/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Liberia/epidemiology , Neglected Diseases/economics , Neglected Diseases/therapy , Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , Infections/economics , Infections/therapy , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/statistics & numerical data , Tropical Medicine/economics , Tropical Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , West African People/statistics & numerical data
3.
Malar J ; 20(1): 192, 2021 Apr 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33879159

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Private sector malaria programmes contribute to government-led malaria elimination strategies in Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Myanmar by increasing access to quality malaria services and surveillance data. However, reporting from private sector providers remains suboptimal in many settings. To support surveillance strengthening for elimination, a key programme strategy is to introduce electronic surveillance tools and systems to integrate private sector data with national systems, and enhance the use of data for decision-making. During 2013-2017, an electronic surveillance system based on open source software, District Health Information System 2 (DHIS2), was implemented as part of a private sector malaria case management and surveillance programme. The electronic surveillance system covered 16,000 private providers in Myanmar (electronic reporting conducted by 200 field officers with tablets), 710 in Cambodia (585 providers reporting through mobile app), and 432 in Laos (250 providers reporting through mobile app). METHODS: The purpose of the study was to document the costs of introducing electronic surveillance systems and mobile reporting solutions in Cambodia, Lao PDR, and Myanmar, comparing the cost in different operational settings, the cost of introduction and maintenance over time, and assessing the affordability and financial sustainability of electronic surveillance. The data collection methods included extracting data from PSI's financial and operational records, collecting data on prices and quantities of resources used, and interviewing key informants in each setting. The costing study used an ingredients-based approach and estimated both financial and economic costs. RESULTS: Annual economic costs of electronic surveillance systems were $152,805 in Laos, $263,224 in Cambodia, and $1,310,912 in Myanmar. The annual economic cost per private provider surveilled was $82 in Myanmar, $371 in Cambodia, and $354 in Laos. Cost drivers varied depending on operational settings and number of private sector outlets covered in each country; whether purchased or personal mobile devices were used; and whether electronic (mobile) reporting was introduced at provider level or among field officers who support multiple providers for case reporting. CONCLUSION: The study found that electronic surveillance comprises about 0.5-1.5% of national malaria strategic plan cost and 7-21% of surveillance budgets and deemed to be affordable and financially sustainable.


Subject(s)
Case Management/economics , Electronics, Medical/economics , Epidemiological Monitoring , Population Surveillance/methods , Private Sector/statistics & numerical data , Cambodia , Humans , Laos , Malaria/epidemiology , Myanmar , Private Sector/economics
4.
Malar J ; 19(1): 161, 2020 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32316981

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Case management is one of the principal strategies for malaria control. This study aimed to estimate the economic costs of uncomplicated malaria case management and explore the influence of health-seeking behaviours on those costs. METHODS: A knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) survey was applied to 680 households of fifteen communities in Mazan-Loreto in March 2017, then a socio-economic survey was conducted in September 2017 among 161 individuals with confirmed uncomplicated malaria in the past 3 months. Total costs per episode were estimated from both provider (Ministry of Health, MoH) and patient perspectives. Direct costs were estimated using a standard costing estimation procedure, while the indirect costs considered the loss of incomes among patients, substitute labourers and companions due to illness in terms of the monthly minimum wage. Sensitivity analysis evaluated the uncertainty of the average cost per episode. RESULTS: The KAP survey showed that most individuals (79.3%) that had malaria went to a health facility for a diagnosis and treatment, 2.7% received those services from community health workers, and 8% went to a drugstore or were self-treated at home. The average total cost per episode in the Mazan district was US$ 161. The cost from the provider's perspective was US$ 30.85 per episode while from the patient's perspective the estimated cost was US$ 131 per episode. The average costs per Plasmodium falciparum episode (US$ 180) were higher than those per Plasmodium vivax episode (US$ 156) due to longer time lost from work by patients with P. falciparum infections (22.2 days) than by patients with P. vivax infections (17.0 days). The delayed malaria diagnosis (after 48 h of the onset of symptoms) was associated with the time lost from work due to illness (adjusted mean ratio 1.8; 95% CI 1.3, 2.6). The average cost per malaria episode was most sensitive to the uncertainty around the lost productivity cost due to malaria. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the provision of free malaria case management by MoH, there is delay in seeking care and the costs of uncomplicated malaria are mainly borne by the families. These costs are not well perceived by the society and the substantial financial impact of the disease can be frequently undervalued in public policy planning.


Subject(s)
Case Management/economics , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Malaria, Falciparum/prevention & control , Malaria, Vivax/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Peru , Young Adult
6.
Clin Rehabil ; 34(4): 460-470, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31964164

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the cost-effectiveness of case manager-assisted rehabilitation as an add-on to usual physical rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion, given the lack of any clinical benefits found on analysing the clinical data. DESIGN: Economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial with two-year follow-up. SETTING: Patients from the outpatient clinics of a university hospital and a general hospital. SUBJECTS: A total of 82 lumbar spinal fusion patients. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized one-to-one to case manager-assisted rehabilitation programme as an add-on to usual physical rehabilitation or to usual physical rehabilitation. MAIN MEASURES: Oswestry Disability Index and EuroQol 5-dimension. Danish preference weights were used to estimate quality-adjusted life years. Costs were estimated from micro costing and national registries. Multiple imputation was used to handle missing data. Costs and effects were presented with means (95% confidence interval (CI)). The incremental net benefit was estimated for a range of hypothetical values of willingness to pay per gain in effects. RESULTS: No impact of case manager-assisted rehabilitation on the Oswestry Disability Index or estimate quality-adjusted life years was observed. Intervention cost was Euros 3984 (3468; 4499), which was outweighed by average reductions in inpatient resource use and sickness leave. A cost reduction of Euros 1716 (-16,651; 20,084) was found in the case manager group. Overall, the probability for the case manager-assisted rehabilitation programme being cost-effective did not exceed a probability of 56%, regardless of willingness to pay. Sensitivity analysis did not change the conclusion. CONCLUSION: This case manager-assisted rehabilitation programme was unlikely to be cost-effective.


Subject(s)
Case Management/economics , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/rehabilitation , Lumbar Vertebrae , Spinal Fusion/economics , Spinal Fusion/rehabilitation , Spondylolisthesis/rehabilitation , Adult , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Denmark , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Spondylolisthesis/surgery
7.
PLoS One ; 14(10): e0224286, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31671116

ABSTRACT

The methodological challenges to effectiveness evaluation of complex interventions has been widely discussed. Bottom-up case management for frail older person was implemented in Belgium, and indeed, it was evaluated as a complex intervention. This paper presents the methodological approach we developed to respond to four main methodological challenges regarding the evaluation of case management: (1) the standardization of the interventions, (2) stratification of the frail older population that was used to test various modalities of case management with different risks groups, (3) the building of a control group, and (4) the use of multiple outcomes in evaluating case management. To address these challenges, we developed a mixed-methods approach that (1) used multiple embedded case studies to classify case management types according to their characteristics and implementation conditions; and (2) compared subgroups of beneficiaries with specific needs (defined by Principal Component Analysis prior to cluster analysis) and a control group receiving 'usual care', to evaluate the effectiveness of case management. The beneficiaries' subgroups were matched using propensity scores and compared using generalized pairwise comparison and the hurdle model with the control group. Our results suggest that the impact of case management on patient health and the services used varies according to specific needs and categories of case management. However, these equivocal results question our methodological approach. We suggest to reconsider the evaluation approach by moving away from a viewing case management as an intervention. Rather, it should be considered as a process of interconnected actions taking place within a complex system.


Subject(s)
Case Management/economics , Case Management/standards , Case Management/trends , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Belgium , Case-Control Studies , Female , Frail Elderly , Humans , Male , Primary Health Care
8.
Trials ; 20(1): 536, 2019 Aug 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31462284

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis is one of the greatest global health concerns and disease management is challenging particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Despite improvements in addressing this epidemic in Georgia, tuberculosis remains a significant public health concern due to sub-optimal patient management. Low remuneration for specialists, limited private-sector interest in provision of infectious disease care and incomplete integration in primary care are at the core of this problem. METHODS: This protocol sets out the methods of a two-arm cluster randomized control trial which aims to generate evidence on the effectiveness of a performance-based financing and integrated care intervention on tuberculosis loss to follow-up and treatment adherence. The trial will be implemented in health facilities (clusters) under-performing in tuberculosis management. Eligible and consenting facilities will be randomly assigned to either intervention or control (standard care). Health providers within intervention sites will form a case management team and be trained in the delivery of integrated tuberculosis care; performance-related payments based on monthly records of patients adhering to treatment and quality of care assessments will be disbursed to health providers in these facilities. The primary outcomes include loss to follow-up among adult pulmonary drug-sensitive and drug-resistant tuberculosis patients. Secondary outcomes are adherence to treatment among drug-sensitive and drug-resistant tuberculosis patients and treatment success among drug-sensitive tuberculosis patients. Data on socio-demographic characteristics, tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment regimen will also be collected. The required sample size to detect a 6% reduction in loss to follow-up among drug-sensitive tuberculosis patients and a 20% reduction in loss to follow-up among drug-resistant tuberculosis patients is 948 and 136 patients, respectively. DISCUSSION: The trial contributes to a limited body of rigorous evidence and literature on the effectiveness of supply-side performance-based financing interventions on tuberculosis patient outcomes. Realist and health economic evaluations will be conducted in parallel with the trial, and associated composite findings will serve as a resource for the Georgian and wider regional Ministries of Health in relation to future tuberculosis and wider health policies. The trial and complementing evaluations are part of Results4TB, a multidisciplinary collaboration engaging researchers and Georgian policy and practice stakeholders in the design and evaluation of a context-sensitive tuberculosis management intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN14667607 . Registered on 14 January 2019.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Case Management/economics , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/economics , Employee Performance Appraisal/economics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics , Reimbursement, Incentive/economics , Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Tuberculosis/economics , Georgia (Republic) , Guideline Adherence/economics , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Tuberculosis/microbiology
9.
JAMA Netw Open ; 2(8): e199782, 2019 08 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31433483

ABSTRACT

Importance: In the At Home/Chez Soi trial for homeless individuals with mental illness, the scattered-site Housing First (HF) with Intensive Case Management (ICM) intervention proved more effective than treatment as usual (TAU). Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the HF plus ICM intervention compared with TAU. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is an economic evaluation study of data from the At Home/Chez Soi randomized clinical trial. From October 2009 through July 2011, 1198 individuals were randomized to the intervention (n = 689) or TAU (n = 509) and followed up for as long as 24 months. Participants were recruited in the Canadian cities of Vancouver, Winnipeg, Toronto, and Montreal. Participants with a current mental disorder who were homeless and had a moderate level of need were included. Data were analyzed from 2013 through 2019, per protocol. Interventions: Scattered-site HF (using rent supplements) with off-site ICM services was compared with usual housing and support services in each city. Main Outcomes and Measures: The analysis was performed from the perspective of society, with days of stable housing as the outcome. Service use was ascertained using questionnaires. Unit costs were estimated in 2016 Canadian dollars. Results: Of 1198 randomized individuals, 795 (66.4%) were men and 696 (58.1%) were aged 30 to 49 years. Almost all (1160 participants, including 677 in the HF group and 483 in the TAU group) contributed data to the economic analysis. Days of stable housing were higher by 140.34 days (95% CI, 128.14-153.31 days) in the HF group. The intervention cost $14 496 per person per year; reductions in costs of other services brought the net cost down by 46% to $7868 (95% CI, $4409-$11 405). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $56.08 (95% CI, $29.55-$84.78) per additional day of stable housing. In sensitivity analyses, adjusting for baseline differences using a regression-based method, without altering the discount rate, caused the largest change in the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio with an increase to $60.18 (95% CI, $35.27-$86.95). At $67 per day of stable housing, there was an 80% chance that HF was cost-effective compared with TAU. The cost-effectiveness of HF appeared to be similar for all participants, although possibly less for those with a higher number of previous psychiatric hospitalizations. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the cost per additional day of stable housing was similar to that of many interventions for homeless individuals. Based on these results, expanding access to HF with ICM appears to be warranted from an economic standpoint. Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN42520374.


Subject(s)
Case Management/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Housing/economics , Ill-Housed Persons/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Adult , Canada , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/economics , Middle Aged
10.
J Diabetes Complications ; 33(6): 445-450, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30975464

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether an all-condition case management program can improve health care utilization and clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: 1342 patients with diabetes were enrolled in the Johns Hopkins Community Health Partnership (J-CHiP) Case Management program for high-risk patients with any chronic disease. We categorized participants into two intervention exposure categories based on the number of contacts with case manager (CM) and community health worker (CHW) per month: low contact (≤1 contact/month), and high contact (>1 contacts/month). The primary outcomes were rates of emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and 30-day hospital readmissions. RESULTS: In analyses adjusted for age, sex, race, risk score, and baseline health utilization rate, Medicaid participants in the high contact group had 42% (rate ratio (RR): 1.42; 95% CI: 1.08-1.86) and 64% (RR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.08-2.48) higher risks for hospital admission and readmission, respectively, than the low contact group. Similar increases were seen in the Medicare participants with 20% (RR: 1.20; 95% 1.02-1.42) and 42% (RR:1.42; 95% 1.09-1.84) higher risks for admission and readmission, respectively. The associations were not statistically significant for ED visits. Subsidiary analysis of a subset with HbA1c available (n = 545) revealed a statistically significant decrease in HbA1c among Medicare participants (mean (SD): -0.17% (1.50%)), with a larger decrease in the high contact group (mean (SD): -0.23% (1.59%)). CONCLUSION: In an all-condition case management program for high-risk patients, the higher intensity of contacts with CHW and CM was not associated with a reduced health care utilization in adults with diabetes.


Subject(s)
Case Management/organization & administration , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case Management/economics , Case Management/standards , Community Participation/economics , Community Participation/methods , Community Participation/statistics & numerical data , Diabetes Mellitus/economics , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Medicaid/economics , Medical Staff/standards , Medicare/economics , Middle Aged , Public Health/methods , Public Health/standards , Public Health/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Risk Reduction Behavior , United States/epidemiology
11.
Psychiatr Serv ; 70(5): 436-439, 2019 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30755130

ABSTRACT

Improving outcomes and reducing costs for individuals with frequent acute episodes of care is a high priority for community behavioral health systems and managed care organizations. This column illustrates the application of interdisciplinary, interagency teamwork-with clinical leadership by the system psychiatric medical director-to a county-level quality improvement team process, a change that resulted in significant improvements in outcomes and costs over a 7-year period.


Subject(s)
Case Management/organization & administration , Cost Control/methods , Interdisciplinary Communication , Patient Care Team , Quality Improvement , Anorexia Nervosa/therapy , Case Management/economics , Child , Child Behavior Disorders/therapy , Cost Control/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/therapy , Needs Assessment/economics , Needs Assessment/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/economics , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
12.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 100(4): 861-867, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30793689

ABSTRACT

Between 2012 and 2017, the U.S. President's Malaria Initiative-funded MalariaCare project supported national malaria control programs in sub-Saharan Africa to implement a case management quality assurance (QA) system for malaria and other febrile illnesses. A major component of the system was outreach training and supportive supervision (OTSS), whereby trained government health personnel visited health facilities to observe health-care practices using a standard checklist, to provide individualized feedback to staff, and to develop health facility-wide action plans based on observation and review of facility registers. Based on MalariaCare's experience, facilitating visits to more than 5,600 health facilities in nine countries, we found that programs seeking to implement similar supportive supervision schemes should consider ensuring the following: 1) develop a practical checklist that balances information gathering and mentorship; 2) establish basic competency criteria for supervisors and periodically assess supervisor performance in the field; 3) conduct both technical skills training and supervision skills training; 4) establish criteria for selecting facilities to conduct OTSS and determine the appropriate frequency of visits; and 5) use electronic data collection systems where possible. Cost will also be a significant consideration: the average cost per OTSS visit ranged from $44 to $333. Significant variation in costs was due to factors such as travel time, allowances for government personnel, length of the visit, and involvement of central level officials. Because the cost of conducting supportive supervision prohibits regularly visiting all health facilities, internal QA measures could also be considered as alternative or complementary activities to supportive supervision.


Subject(s)
Case Management/economics , Health Personnel/economics , Health Plan Implementation/economics , Malaria/economics , Africa South of the Sahara , Case Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Costs and Cost Analysis , Health Personnel/education , Health Plan Implementation/methods , Humans , Organization and Administration/economics , Primary Health Care/economics , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care
13.
Harm Reduct J ; 16(1): 8, 2019 01 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30691491

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To improve healthcare entry and antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation for HIV-positive people who inject drugs (PWID) in Ukraine, an intervention built upon a successful community-based harm reduction project and the existing best practices was developed. In this article, we present the results of the study conducted in collaboration with one of the recipient organizations of the intervention in Kyiv. The research question was formulated as follows: how does the interaction between different actors work to lead it to a positive outcome (initiation PWIDs into ART) within the limited period of the intervention implementation? METHODS: The central focus of the study was on the work activities of case managers. Their daily routines as well as their interactions with their clients and medical workers were observed and analyzed. Using the institutional ethnography approach, we explore the institutional orders, power imbalances, and social factors that play different roles in coordinating the process of PWIDs entry into healthcare and HIV treatment. RESULTS: The most intriguing result of the study is that the performance indicator that must be completed in order to receive a full salary-as a way to manage the activities of case managers-produces conditions for them to develop their cooperation with medical workers but leaves the clients and their needs out of this "boat" because interaction with them, in fact, does not help to meet case managers' goals. CONCLUSIONS: Accountability of case managers' work assumes the primacy of the result over the process, which makes the process itself less important and the need to achieve the goal becomes the main and the only goal. This can be identified as an unintended consequence of the intervention implementation on the ground, or wider-an unintended consequence of the payment by results practice as a part of the general number-based policy.


Subject(s)
Case Management/organization & administration , Drug Users/statistics & numerical data , HIV Infections/therapy , Algorithms , Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/statistics & numerical data , Case Management/economics , Community Health Centers , Goals , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Harm Reduction , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Physician-Patient Relations , Social Environment , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/complications , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/therapy , Ukraine
14.
BMC Emerg Med ; 19(1): 83, 2019 12 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31888508

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous systematic reviews have examined the effectiveness of interventions for frequent presenters to the Emergency Department (ED) but not the costs and cost-effectiveness of such interventions. METHOD: A systematic literature review was conducted which screened the following databases: Pubmed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Econlit. An inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed following PRISMA guidelines. A narrative review methodology was adopted due to the heterogeneity of the reporting of the costs across the studies. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred eighty-nine papers were found and 16 were included in the review. All of the interventions were variations of a case management approach. Apart from one study which had mixed results, all of the papers reported a decrease in ED use and costs. There were no cost effectiveness studies. CONCLUSION: The majority of interventions for frequent presenters to the ED were found to decrease ED use and cost. Future research should be undertaken to examine the cost effectiveness of these interventions.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Case Management/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Public Assistance/economics , Referral and Consultation/economics
15.
Dementia (London) ; 18(3): 951-969, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29149792

ABSTRACT

Case management is generally seen as a way to provide efficient, cost-saving person-centred care for people with dementia by connecting together fragmented services, but the available evidence in favour of its merits is often considered inconclusive, unclear and sketchy. This discussion paper investigates the evidence of the benefit of case management for people with dementia and explores the complexity of the concept and the experiences of its implementation. It offers a comprehensive framework for conceptualising various types of case management and asks the question: who can be a case manager? Building on examples from three European countries it addresses the problem of the expansion and adoption of the case management method. It compares the conventional model of diffusion of innovation with the ideas of interessement and co-constitution and envisions a successful model of case management as a fluid technology that is both friendly and flexible, allowing it to adapt to different settings and systems.


Subject(s)
Dementia , Patient-Centered Care , Primary Health Care/methods , Case Management/economics , Dementia/nursing , Diffusion of Innovation , Efficiency, Organizational , Europe , Humans
16.
Eur J Health Econ ; 20(2): 281-301, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30051153

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Identification of cost-driving factors in patients undergoing liver transplantation is essential to target reallocation of resources and potential savings. AIM: The aim of this study is to identify main cost-driving factors in liver transplantation from the perspective of the Statutory Health Insurance. METHODS: Variables were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression to determine their influence on high cost cases (fourth quartile) in the outpatient, inpatient and rehabilitative healthcare sectors as well as for medications. RESULTS: Significant cost-driving factors for the inpatient sector of care were a high labMELD-score (OR 1.042), subsequent re-transplantations (OR 7.159) and patient mortality (OR 3.555). Expenditures for rehabilitative care were significantly higher in patients with a lower adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (OR 0.601). The indication of viral cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma resulted in significantly higher costs for medications (OR 21.618 and 7.429). For all sectors of care and medications each waiting day had a significant impact on high treatment costs (OR 1.001). Overall, cost-driving factors resulted in higher median treatment costs of 211,435 €. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment costs in liver transplantation were significantly influenced by identified factors. Long pre-transplant waiting times that increase overall treatment costs need to be alleviated by a substantial increase in donor organs to enable transplantation with lower labMELD-scores. Disease management programs, the implementation of a case management for vulnerable patients, medication plans and patient tracking in a transplant registry may enable cost savings, e.g., by the avoidance of otherwise necessary re-transplants or incorrect medication.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , Hospitalization/economics , Liver Transplantation/economics , Adult , Case Management/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Drug Costs , Female , Germany , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/economics , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Insurance, Health , Liver Diseases/drug therapy , Liver Diseases/economics , Liver Diseases/surgery , Liver Transplantation/rehabilitation , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
17.
Glob Public Health ; 14(2): 227-240, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30068257

ABSTRACT

The epidemiological and economic burden of diabetes poses one of the main challenges for health systems worldwide. This is particularly relevant in middle-income countries because of the constant growing trends that have been observed in recent years. In order to identify trends and challenges on epidemiological and economic burden from diabetes in a middle-income country we developed a longitudinal analysis on costs and trends in the number of cases of diabetes in Mexico. The study population included total annual cases of diabetes at national level. Regarding the annual cumulative incidence for 2016 versus 2018, depending on the institution there is an increase of 9-13% (p < 0.001). Comparing the economic burden from incidence in 2016 versus 2018 (p < 0.05), there is a 26% increase. The total amount for diabetes in 2017 (US dollars) was $9,684,780,574. It includes $ 4,292,085,964 in direct costs and $ 5,392,694,610 in indirect costs. The total direct costs are: $ 510,986,406 for uninsured population; $ 1,416,132,058 for insured population; $ 2,235,969,330 for users' pockets. This is an example of what is happening in the management of diabetes care in middle-income countries and we suggest review and rethinking strategies of prevention, planning, organisation and resource allocation.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Diabetes Mellitus , Case Management/economics , Delivery of Health Care , Diabetes Mellitus/economics , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/prevention & control , Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Humans , Mexico/epidemiology , Resource Allocation
19.
Soc Work Health Care ; 58(1): 32-59, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30321132

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of integration of pediatric integrated behavioral health service delivery models (IBHSDM) since it has not been well established. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of journal databases (e.g., PubMed) and Google searches was used to identify publications. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they examined children who were treated in an IBHSDM. DATA EXTRACTION: The authors extracted data from studies and assessed them for level of integration using a federal conceptual framework. DATA SYNTHESIS: Guided by PRISMA standards, the authors identified 40 journal articles that described 32 integrated delivery models. Five models (15.6%) were rated at integration level 1 or 2 (coordinated care), eight models (25%) were rated level 3 and five models (15.6%) were rated level 4 (co-located care), and fourteen models (43.8%) were rated level 5 or 6 (integrated care). CONCLUSIONS: In general, it is assumed that more completely integrated care will result in higher quality care and reduced costs. Thirteen of the models described (40.6%) had levels of integration of 3 or lower that may be too low to produce desired effects on quality and cost. Future research should address potential barriers that impede the development of models with higher degrees of integration.


Subject(s)
Case Management/organization & administration , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Pediatrics/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Systems Integration , Case Management/economics , Case Management/standards , Humans , Mental Health Services/economics , Mental Health Services/standards , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Pediatrics/economics , Pediatrics/standards , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation , United States
20.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 21(2): 159-168, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30570200

ABSTRACT

Home blood pressure (BP) telemonitoring and pharmacist case management reduce BP, but cost-effectiveness assessments are mixed. We examined the incremental cost-effectiveness of this intervention vs usual care in Canadians with cerebrovascular disease. A Markov decision model cost-utility analysis examining community-residing, high-risk patients with a recent nondisabling cerebrovascular event was created. A lifetime time horizon and health care payer perspective were used. Achieved BP, future cardiovascular risks, and attendant consequences on quality-adjusted life years and Canadian dollar costs were modeled. BP telemonitoring was assumed to occur for 3 months, then quarterly. Life tables were used to determine overall mortality, adjusted by cardiovascular disease mortality. Relative efficacies of intervention-associated BP lowering, resource use, and costs were obtained from Canadian published literature. Reduction in systolic BP of 9.7 mmHg was used in the base case; subsequently, robust sensitivity analyses were conducted. The results showed that, over the lifetime horizon, telemonitoring with case management led to net health care savings of $1929 Canadian and increased per-patient QALYs by 0.83. These findings were robust to sensitivity analysis, with the intervention remaining dominant or highly cost-effective. Increasing telemonitoring costs by 50% still resulted in the intervention being dominant; if the costs of telemonitoring plus case management were 2-3 times base case cost, incremental cost-effectiveness was $1200-$4700 per quality-adjusted life year gained. In conclusion, home BP telemonitoring and pharmacist case management poststroke lowered costs and improved QALYs. Strategies and funding for broad implementation of this dominant strategy should be implemented.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination/economics , Case Management/economics , Cerebrovascular Disorders/prevention & control , Hypertension/diagnosis , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Canada , Cerebrovascular Disorders/mortality , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Male , Markov Chains , Middle Aged , Mortality , Pharmacists , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Secondary Prevention/economics , Telemedicine/economics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...